Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

For full disclosure I am getting involved in the CleanEnergyForBiden.com group, which is doing some great work. He wasn't my first choice by any means, but I do think he'll put the right people in charge of the various departments, at least.

I've asked repeatedly for the outline of a general plan here.

I would like to know:

1.  How much will this cost (est.).
2.  How much would it reduce global warming and by when (using the models).
3.  What would it do specifically to replace coal, NG, automobiles, jet aircraft, ships, etc.
4.  Timing.

Just some general estimates would suffice.  I've looked in vain for answers to these points.  The KEY is point TWO.

Yup, it is, and I've searched for a "plan" as I've noted on many occasions.

https://cgcs.mit.edu/news-release-how-much-difference-will-paris-agreement-make

This site is interesting, this is IF every country meets its obligations under the Paris Climate Accord, which is a large if. 

"Because the climate system takes many years to respond to emissions reductions, in 2050 the SAT falls by only about 0.1° C in all three cases. Meanwhile, the rise in SAT since preindustrial times exceeds 2° C in 2053, and in 2100, reaches between 2.7 and 3.6° C—far exceeding the 2° C goal."

“The Paris agreement is certainly a step in the right direction, but it is only a step,” said Monier. “It puts us on the right path to keep warming under 3° C, but even under the same level of commitment of the Paris Agreement after 2030, our study indicates a 95 percent probability that the world will warm by more than 2° C by 2100.”

That looks like a PLAN to you?

OK then.  Some folks appear to be satisfied with vague notional nonexplicit aspirations and goals that will reduce temperature by an unmeasurable amount.

I suppose I am more quantitative, and like at least some general level of detail.

Hint, that in no way is a plan, in NO form or interpretation is that a plan.