Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

Player A
Year 1:  259-395 (65.6%) for 3,896 yds and 34 TD with 12 INT ~ 170.8 rating.......rush N/A
Year 2:  287-503 (57.1%) for 3,402 yds and 22 TD with 17 INT ~ 121.5 rating.......rush N/A
.
Player B
Year 1:  90-152 (59.2%) for 1,840 yds and 12 TD with 5 INT ~ 180.4 rating.....108 car for 585 yds rushing (5.4 ypc) with 8 TD
Year 2:  87-161 (54.0%) for 1,234 yds and 8 TD with 6 INT ~ 127.4 rating.....104 car for 617 yds rushing (5.9 ypc) with 8 TD
.
Player C
Year 1:  107-161 (66.5%) for 1,474 yds and 7 TD with 6 INT ~ 150.3 rating.....156 car for 418 rushing yds (2.7 ypc) with 8 TD
Year 2:  119-204 (58.3%) for 1,131 yds and 4 TD with 10 INT ~ 101.6 rating.....104 car for -1 rushing yard (0.0 ypc) with 2 TD
.
Who fell off the biggest cliff?  Player IDs after voting concludes.

A

Player C went from useful dual-threat production to basically losing the entire rushing side:

418 rushing yards and 8 rushing TDs down to -1 rushing yard and 2 rushing TDs. Add the passing drop and the higher INTs, and that’s the biggest all-around collapse.
So my ranking would be:

1. Player C - worst overall regression
2. Player A - worst pure passing/volume regression
3. Player B - ugly passing drop, but rushing softened the fall

C is the worst regression (and I think I might remember who it was and be laughing about his pro prospects?)

B feels like an option QB who dipped slightly with some noise. EDIT: I now have a guess for B and it’s not a pure option guy, but more of a modern one.

A feels like a gunslinger who got overconfident and sloppy (I also think I know who that was)

And wrong on all guesses!

Could you share your guesses? (not the actual players)
I'm curious who you were thinking.