header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Weather, Climate, Environment, and Energy

 (Read 517520 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37403
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3262 on: August 16, 2020, 10:33:35 AM »
no input needed from knuckle dragging mouth breathers

just fork over the money
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3263 on: August 16, 2020, 02:03:26 PM »
I didn't say that most folks think that, I said that most folk who deploy the term "science denier" think that. And while it was obviously couched in a little bit of hyperbole, the point is that they often think that there is more than two genders, and in many instances they believe that there are more than three genders, and sizable portion of the ones that believe that there are more than three genders believe that there are a LOT more than three genders, and their opinion on the matter is obviously not rooted in science. Unless of course you include junk science.
I read that some on-line entity (Google? Facebook? Snapchat? IDK) was ready to recognize differentiated pronouns for 51 genders.
That would put your measly 3 dozen genders in the shade.
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71170
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3264 on: August 16, 2020, 04:25:52 PM »
I saw somewhere what the impact would be if the US and the EU met all their obligations under Paris.  The impact was well under measurable.  I read also what the impact would be if both entities went to zero carbon by 2030, and again the impact was not measurable.

I understand why China and India want their share of the total CO2 production over time, but it's not leading to any solution (not that there is a real solution).

The main issue I've noted many times, we have not practicable plan or means to do much of anything at all besides a tenth or so, maybe.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17621
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3265 on: August 16, 2020, 05:04:47 PM »
I saw somewhere what the impact would be if the US and the EU met all their obligations under Paris.  The impact was well under measurable.  I read also what the impact would be if both entities went to zero carbon by 2030, and again the impact was not measurable.

I understand why China and India want their share of the total CO2 production over time, but it's not leading to any solution (not that there is a real solution).

The main issue I've noted many times, we have not practicable plan or means to do much of anything at all besides a tenth or so, maybe.
Any chance those studies also included economic impact to EU and USA?  Because that's where the rubber meets the road.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71170
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3266 on: August 16, 2020, 05:15:47 PM »
Any chance those studies also included economic impact to EU and USA?  Because that's where the rubber meets the road.
They don't, because there is no plan, so we couldn't estimate the impact on spending and higher costs for energy of course.  But, it would be bad obviously, unless you just did some lip service (which is what happens).

Cost:benefit ratios.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17621
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3267 on: August 16, 2020, 05:37:30 PM »


Cost:benefit ratios.

How do they work???
:)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71170
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3268 on: August 17, 2020, 05:59:06 AM »
This is an ideal "cause" for government to throw money out there, probably to reward certain groups, in the expectation (not really) of doing something real.  Down the road, no one will notice of course reality, or the folks throwing money will be long out of office (or not).

Asking the hard pointed questions is not appreciated in part because no one has answers to them, it's just hand waving and "wind and solar" out the yin yang coupled with "you are a science denier" and "she is paid by Exxon".

I'm tired, Boss.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25050
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3269 on: August 17, 2020, 08:39:23 AM »
I've been called a denier, because I ask questions.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13062
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3270 on: August 17, 2020, 08:43:23 AM »
I feel the opposite - it's all well don't pay attention, it's no big deal, what can you do, don't even try.  There's no plan from the climate changing folks - it's all just stay the course and if we are screwed we are screwed light up another cigar.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25050
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3271 on: August 17, 2020, 08:48:14 AM »
Well, there is no plan.

Climate change is a problem. We all know this. How to change it is the question, and nobody seems to be able to come up with an answer.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71170
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3272 on: August 17, 2020, 08:53:50 AM »
This cost:benefit question is something we ALL ask ourselves, daily.  It's a core part of how we function.

So, I think it prudent to inquire when folks are talking about spending hundreds of billions of borrowed dollars.  (And yes, I ask it about our military spending as well.)

Otherwise, we're expected to just blindly sheep along saying "Well, we have to do something."


MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13062
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3273 on: August 17, 2020, 08:54:53 AM »
Well, there is no plan.

Climate change is a problem. We all know this. How to change it is the question, and nobody seems to be able to come up with an answer.
This isn't true.  Koch Industries (and similar) has spent a tremendous amount of time and money to question whether it is a problem and prevent any action on it. Which makes sense - Koch industries makes a tremendous amount of money from fossil fuels and it would be dumb of them to support a plan which limits their own profit. 

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13062
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3274 on: August 17, 2020, 08:56:25 AM »
This cost:benefit question is something we ALL ask ourselves, daily.  It's a core part of how we function.

So, I think it prudent to inquire when folks are talking about spending hundreds of billions of borrowed dollars.  (And yes, I ask it about our military spending as well.)

Otherwise, we're expected to just blindly sheep along saying "Well, we have to do something."
We are doing something one way or another.  Status quo is often phrased as "not doing something" but it is still doing something.  What is the cost/benefit analysis of our current plan?

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71170
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #3275 on: August 17, 2020, 08:58:21 AM »
This isn't true.  Koch Industries (and similar) has spent a tremendous amount of time and money to question whether it is a problem and prevent any action on it. Which makes sense - Koch industries makes a tremendous amount of money from fossil fuels and it would be dumb of them to support a plan which limits their own profit.
We're past this point, in this discussion.  To claim there is some plan is simply false.  If there is one, then cite it.

There is no "current plan" either.  And what little is being done is going to produce a result we cannot measure.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.