header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 1033678 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91443
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6020 on: August 22, 2026, 06:19:08 PM »
We did find a restaurant in Athens, the one in Greece, that was really good, diners were all locals nearly as I could tell, not tres cher.

We had street food there that was good also.  I'd like to go back to Greece some day and spend a couple weeks.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91443
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6021 on: August 22, 2026, 07:29:38 PM »



FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 56185
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6022 on: August 22, 2026, 09:26:04 PM »
I'd pay $50
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91443
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6023 on: August 23, 2026, 07:28:09 AM »
I'd pay $100, I have paid more in the past for special events.  I presume these are the cheapest seats available, which could be "OK".


FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 56185
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6024 on: August 23, 2026, 10:09:18 AM »
18. Hank Brown or Jeremy Hecklinski, Iowa
17. Ryan Browne, Purdue
16. Dylan Lonergan, Rutgers
15. Alessio Milivojevic, Michigan State
14. Aidan Chiles, Northwestern
13. Katin Houser, Illinois
12. Colton Joseph, Wisconsin
11. Malik Washington, Maryland

10. Drake Lindsey, Minnesota
Drake Lindsey put together an encouraging freshman season at Minnesota and enters 2026 looking to take another step forward. Lindsey threw 18 touchdown passes while adding four scores on the ground and tossing only six interceptions across 389 attempts.

9. Anthony Colandrea, Nebraska
Anthony Colandrea arrives at Nebraska after taking his game to another level during his lone season at UNLV. The former Virginia quarterback won Mountain West Player of the Year after throwing for 3,459 yards and 23 touchdowns while rushing for another 649 yards and 10 scores.

His ability to improvise and create outside the pocket gives Matt Rhule a much different option than former starter Dylan Raiola. If Colandrea’s success translates to the Big Ten, he could provide the spark Nebraska has been searching for offensively.

8. Bryce Underwood, Michigan
Bryce Underwood entered Michigan with enormous expectations and showed flashes of his five-star potential while starting as a true freshman. He finished 2025 with 2,428 passing yards, 11 touchdowns and nine interceptions while adding 392 yards and six scores on the ground.

Myerberg believes Michigan’s new coaching staff could help unlock another level from the talented sophomore. With offensive coordinator Jason Beck now working with him, Underwood has an opportunity to make a significant jump during his second season in Ann Arbor.

7. Rocco Becht, Penn State
Penn State is beginning a new era under Matt Campbell, and Rocco Becht gives the Nittany Lions an experienced quarterback who already understands what his new coach wants offensively. Becht followed Campbell from Iowa State after throwing for 9,274 yards and 64 touchdowns during his career with the Cyclones.

He also earned Big 12 Offensive Freshman of the Year honors in 2023 before continuing to develop into a proven starter. That familiarity should help Penn State’s transition as Campbell attempts to immediately compete in the Big Ten.


6. Nico Iamaleava, UCLA
Nico Iamaleava’s first season at UCLA produced mixed results, but another opportunity awaits under new Bruins coach Bob Chesney. Iamaleava completed 64.4% of his passes for 1,928 yards, 13 touchdowns and seven interceptions in 11 appearances last season.

He also showed his dual-threat ability by leading UCLA with 505 rushing yards while scoring four touchdowns on the ground. Chesney produced one of the nation’s highest-scoring offenses at James Madison last season, giving Iamaleava a chance to showcase more of his talent in 2026.

5. Jayden Maiava, USC
Jayden Maiava might not receive the same national attention as some of the other quarterbacks in the Big Ten, but his production speaks for itself. The USC standout threw for 3,711 yards and 24 touchdowns last season while completing 65.8% of his passes and earning third-team All-Big Ten honors.

He also led the nation with a 91.2 QBR as the Trojans leaned heavily on his arm. With Lincoln Riley adding more talent around him, Maiava has an opportunity to climb even higher if USC returns to College Football Playoff contention.

4. Josh Hoover, Indiana
Josh Hoover faces one of the toughest assignments in college football after transferring to Indiana to replace Heisman Trophy winner Fernando Mendoza. However, the former TCU quarterback brings plenty of experience after throwing for 9,629 yards and 71 touchdowns during his career with the Horned Frogs.

Hoover produced 3,472 passing yards and 29 touchdowns in 2025 before entering the portal. Turnovers remain something to monitor after he threw 24 interceptions over the past two seasons, but Curt Cignetti has enjoyed tremendous success with transfer quarterbacks in Bloomington.

3. Demond Williams, Washington
Demond Williams Jr. could be one of the Big Ten’s biggest breakout stars during the 2026 season. The Washington quarterback completed 69.5% of his passes for 3,065 yards and 28 touchdowns last year while establishing himself as one of the conference’s most productive young signal-callers.

He also provides another dimension with his legs after rushing for 611 yards and six touchdowns. Myerberg believes the next challenge is producing against elite competition after Washington struggled offensively in losses to Ohio State, Michigan and Oregon last season.

2. Dante Moore, Oregon
Dante Moore could have entered the 2026 NFL Draft as one of its top quarterback prospects, but instead elected to return to Oregon for another season. Moore threw for 3,565 yards and 30 touchdowns while completing 71.8% of his passes last year, helping lead the Ducks all the way to the College Football Playoff semifinals.

Now, he enters 2026 as one of the top quarterback prospects for the 2027 NFL Draft. One major hurdle remains, as Myerberg pointed toward Moore throwing three interceptions across Oregon’s two losses to Indiana last season.

1. Julian Sayin, Ohio State
Julian Sayin sits atop Myerberg’s Big Ten quarterback rankings after putting together a remarkable first full season as Ohio State’s starter. Sayin completed 77% of his passes for 3,610 yards and 32 touchdowns, eventually finishing as a Heisman Trophy finalist and earning third-team AP All-America honors.

He now gets another season throwing to superstar receiver Jeremiah Smith, giving Ohio State one of the most dangerous combinations in college football. With Arthur Smith taking over as offensive coordinator, Sayin has a chance to improve on those numbers and make another run at the Heisman Trophy.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91443
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6025 on: August 24, 2026, 08:24:25 AM »



Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91443
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6026 on: August 24, 2026, 08:51:26 AM »

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37432
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6027 on: August 24, 2026, 08:58:03 AM »
No respect for IU and Cignetti.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

GopherRock

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3120
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6028 on: August 24, 2026, 09:02:07 AM »



Interesting ranking. Usually Minnesota gets slagged off in such rankings.

Also, whoever put this chart together is using the #2 ranked state seal for Minnesota. #1:



Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91443
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6029 on: August 24, 2026, 09:17:05 AM »
One of my points is how difficult it would be to assess such things.  Take road quality, how many drivers would it take to assess it by state?  Thousands?  Maybe they just do some poll on Facebook.  One would need to drive hundreds of miles in a state to "have a clue", back roads, interstates, etc.

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7328
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6030 on: August 24, 2026, 10:31:15 AM »




Louisiana has Colorado's state flag next to it.  Also, Colorado appears to be missing from the list.  West Virginia is listed twice.  

At any rate, any such list that doesn't have Louisiana at the very bottom is objectively wrong.  Anyone who has ever driven there knows this is fact.  

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7328
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6031 on: August 24, 2026, 10:42:48 AM »
Also, it used the number 33 twice and completely left out 39 and 42.  Using 33 twice makes up for one gap, but leaving out another number and thinking you counted to 50 is superbly dumb because the way the graphic is set up.  Should be two columns of 25, and clearly the right column is short.

Click generation......this wasn't an serious attempt at a list that fell short.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 91443
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6032 on: August 24, 2026, 10:51:08 AM »
I didn't pay that much attention, I figure most of this stuff is AI crap that means nothing.

Ugh.

GopherRock

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3120
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #6033 on: August 24, 2026, 11:30:56 AM »
One of my points is how difficult it would be to assess such things.  Take road quality, how many drivers would it take to assess it by state?  Thousands?  Maybe they just do some poll on Facebook.  One would need to drive hundreds of miles in a state to "have a clue", back roads, interstates, etc.
MnDOT has a LIDAR-equipped van that measures how pockmarked the surface is (and by extension, how damaged the subgrade is). We use it to schedule pavement maintenance and types of reconstruction (mill-and-overlay vs. full-depth reclaim vs. regrade).

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.