https://www.si.com/college-football/every-2026-power-4-quarterback-ranked-from-68-to-1-digital-cover?utm_source=facebook&utm_campaign=traffic-SI-college-football-2026-quarterback-rankings-annat-120826-v1-c15&utm_medium=120251122187940503&pl=Facebook_Desktop_Feed&ssn=fb&ad_id=120251122187870503&adset_id=120251122187870503&campaign_id=120251122187870503&_pmt=1&utm_id=120251122187890503&utm_content=120251122187940503&utm_term=120251122187870503&fbclid=IwY2xjawTq_sJwZG9mAWV4dG4DYWVtATAAYWRpZAGrN8Iz4wonc3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHtkYwVvURZ4LhbfqUPvGwYvnadIQDBELK-klvxFZ-qXOzqBAmP1Lu9n9BX3o_aem_ell55aG3LFRk4DHsqyDvZw
67. Jeremy Hecklinski/Hank Brown, Iowa
2025 Stats (combined): 13 for 23, 115 yards, one touchdown, one interception
Quarterback play under Kirk Ferentz has become a slog in recent years, and even highly touted South Dakota State transfer Mark Gronowski couldn’t throw for more than 1,741 yards, making it seven straight years without a Hawkeye reaching the 2,000-yard mark—the only Big Ten program to do so in that span. He did rush for 16 touchdowns, leading the conference, but what Hecklinski or Brown can provide in that realm remains mostly unknown. Either quarterback will have the benefit of having leading rusher Kamari Moulton back, so expect more three yards and a cloud of dust (long live the Big Ten West) in Iowa City.
66. Ryan Browne, Purdue
2025 Stats: 58.9% completion rate, 2,153 yards, nine touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 115.3 efficiency rating
Browne’s first season as the starter in West Lafayette left a whole lot to be desired and it’s worth wondering whether Barry Odom should have looked elsewhere for his second season at the helm. The redshirt junior will be one of just two returning quarterbacks in the Power 4 who threw more interceptions (10) than touchdowns (nine) against FBS competition last season. And it’s not just turnovers—Browne was 56th out of 60 eligible Power 4 QBs in completion percentage last season. Purdue’s offense was at its best in 2025 when Browne was able to use his legs, so that’s sure to remain the focus for the Boilermakers.
65. Dylan Lonergan, Rutgers
2025 Stats (Boston College): 66.9% completion rate, 2,025 yards, 12 touchdowns, five interceptions, 137.2 efficiency rating
This may be one of the closest and most difficult competitions to project in the Power 4 this season between Lonergan and AJ Surace, but that doesn’t mean the outcome will drastically change the outlook for Rutgers behind center this season. Lonergan has some juice, showing off real upside in games against Michigan State, Stanford and Georgia Tech last season. The issue was everything else: In his six other games against FBS opponents, Lonergan was benched twice, left one game with an injury and completed 61.1% of his passes with just one passing touchdown and six turnovers.
62. Alessio Milivojevic, Michigan State
2025 Stats: 64.2% completion rate, 1,267 yards, 10 touchdowns, three interceptions, 141.3 rating
Milivojevic was given the reins down the stretch as Jonathan Smith tried to salvage his tenure at Michigan State and kept the Spartans in a number of closer games. He also struggled under constant pressure in the pocket, taking 14 sacks in four starts, though he shouldn’t take all the blame for that. Both he and Aidan Chiles were running for their lives all season long as the Spartans had one of the worst offensive lines in the Power 4—an obvious area for improvement for new head coach Pat Fitzgerald.
51. Aidan Chiles, Northwestern
2025 Stats (Michigan State): 63.1% completion rate, 1,392 yards, 10 touchdowns, three interceptions, 134.0 efficiency rating
There may be no quarterback on this list who stands to gain the most from his new offensive coordinator, as Chiles looks to highlight the best parts of his game in Chip Kelly’s system. Northwestern’s offense for the past decade has been the butt of a bad joke, but the Wildcats also haven’t quite had a player like Chiles—high reward and even higher risk. He has a big arm and is plenty mobile. He also took 51 sacks in two years at Michigan State and turned the ball over 21 times. For the first time in a long time, fans in Evanston will at least get to say this: The offense is worth watching.
49. Colton Joseph, Wisconsin
2025 Stats (Old Dominion): 59.7% completion rate, 2,624 yards, 21 touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 152.7 efficiency rating
The Badgers’ offense has labored for three years under Luke Fickell, plummeting to 133rd out of 134 FBS teams in points per game last season (12.8), ahead of only 0–12 UMass. To land a dual threat like Joseph is a huge win, if not an indication that Fickell is down to his last strike in Madison. The production is difficult to argue with: Joseph was eighth last season in total yards per game (302.6) and second in yards per completion (15.2), complementing an efficient throwing year with 1,007 rushing yards and 13 touchdowns on the ground. But he was also bolstered by a strong defense, which allowed for more freedom in the Sun Belt—wiggle room that he may not have when playing in the Big Ten.
45. Malik Washington, Maryland
2025 Stats: 57.7% completion rate, 2,963 yards, 17 touchdowns, nine interceptions, 118.4 efficiency rating
Few freshman quarterbacks are given the keys quite like Washington was in his first collegiate season. And unsurprisingly, it was a mixed bag. After a 4–0 start against FAU, Northern Illinois, Towson and Wisconsin, Maryland didn’t win again and Washington looked like a teenager—which he was! He completed fewer than 57% of his passes and threw eight interceptions in eight games, and the Terps looked lost. There were still enough moments of brilliance, like 459 yards and three touchdowns against Michigan State, 164 rushing yards against Rutgers and taking just eight sacks all year long. Now it’s time for Mike Locksley to give his young quarterback some help.
39. Drake Lindsey, Minnesota
2025 Stats: 63.2% completion rate, 2,382 yards, 18 touchdowns, six interceptions, 126.9 efficiency rating
Lindsey went 7–5 as a starter as a redshirt freshman, and put up a season stat line that looks impressive on paper with 22 total touchdowns compared to just six turnovers. Still, he’s a major work in progress. He threw for more than 200 yards in just five of those games, with Minnesota seeming determined to not overuse him. He also threw for 94 yards against Ohio State, 109 yards and three interceptions against Iowa and 138 yards against Oregon, showing there’s still a ton of growth to be done to compete against the league’s top defenses.
37. Katin Houser, Illinois
2025 Stats (East Carolina): 65.9% completion rate, 3,300 yards, 19 touchdowns, six interceptions, 146.3 efficiency rating
Houser is back in the Big Ten and has grown plenty since he started the bulk of Michigan State’s games in the latter half of the 2023 season. His tenure at East Carolina got off to a shaky beginning as he didn’t start in Week 1 and when he did finally get the call he threw 11 interceptions in eight games. But he cut down on the picks in ’25 (six in 12 starts) and was a more effective scrambler (193 rushing yards and nine touchdowns). Bret Bielema rode the growth of Luke Altmyer the past three seasons; in ’26 he’ll bank on Houser already being the full version of himself.
27. Anthony Colandrea, Nebraska - TOO LOW2025 Stats (UNLV): 65.9% completion rate, 3,469 yards, 23 touchdowns, nine interceptions, 149.5 efficiency rating
We’ve seen this movie plenty before: Ex–Power 4 quarterback drops down to Group of 6 standout, balls out and then gets another opportunity. And we haven’t forgotten Colandrea’s roller coaster two years at Virginia, which is why he doesn’t land closer to Byrum Brown or Drew Mestemaker as guys who are making the P4 leap. But what he accomplished last season deserves recognition. He looked explosive, cut down on the mistakes and risk-taking from his final year with the Hoos and, most importantly, he won. In the only regular-season games UNLV lost, the offense scored 31 and 35 points. The last time a Nebraska quarterback won nine games in a single season? Tommy Armstrong in 2014.
26. Nico Iamaleava, UCLA
2025 Stats: 64.4% completion rate, 1,928 yards, 13 touchdowns, seven interceptions, 123.5 efficiency rating
It’s not surprising that Iamaleava’s counting stats dipped significantly at UCLA given the talent around him and general turmoil within the program. And for the third straight season, the former five-star recruit will be working with a new head coach and play-caller. Bob Chesney would be wise to lean into Iamaleava’s rushing ability, seeing as he ran for 505 yards on 4.5 yards per carry in 2025, and Chesney is fresh off of maximizing a mobile quarterback in Barnett. The sort of performance that Iamaleava had in the Penn State upset last season (70.8% completions on 24 attempts for 166 yards and two touchdowns; 16 carries for 128 yards) is the goal to replicate.
25. Rocco Becht, Penn State
2025 Stats (Iowa State): 60.5% completion rate, 2,584 yards, 16 touchdowns, nine interceptions, 134.8 efficiency rating
Becht is the epitome of consistency at the collegiate level and enters the 2026 season, boasting the second-most career passing yards among active players behind only Hoover. That’s basically to say, the fifth-year man is what he is at this point. He has 26 career wins, the most among active FBS quarterbacks, and has done so by managing games well, not taking too many risks (27 interceptions, but never more than nine in a season) and using his legs when necessary (19 career rushing touchdowns). Becht will ride out his career in Happy Valley with Campbell—a winning combination thus far.
23. Bryce Underwood, Michigan - TOO HIGH
2025 Stats: 60.3% completion rate, 2,428 yards, 11 touchdowns, nine interceptions, 126.6 efficiency rating
Few players will benefit from an in-house regime change as much as Underwood, who wasn’t given a chance to spread his wings in his freshman season. Michigan continued to emphasize the run-first methodology that Jim Harbaugh rode to a national championship, as the true freshman threw more than 30 passes just three times in 13 games. He was also dreadful as a passer against top competition, completing just 50.9% of his passes for four touchdowns and four interceptions against Oklahoma, USC, Ohio State and Texas. Underwood could certainly be more accurate on open throws, though it stands to reason that he may lean even further into his athleticism and ability to run under new OC Jason Beck.
10. Josh Hoover, Indiana
2025 Stats (TCU): 65.9% completion rate, 3,472 yards, 29 touchdowns, 13 interceptions, 153.4 efficiency rating
The heir to Mendoza also arrives as a transfer, as Cignetti tries to plug in the best guy for the job. And Hoover is capable of being that as a quarterback who’s started 31 games and is the active Power 4 leader in career passing yards. That said, it’s really difficult to overlook how careless he is with the football. He’s turned the ball over 42 times in three seasons and is one of just five QBs in the CFP era to have back-to-back years of 15-plus turnovers. Indiana was the best team in the country at protecting the football last season, so Hoover’s tendencies won’t fly with Cignetti in Bloomington. This is as much a bet, or maybe even more so, on Indiana’s coach unlocking the best version of this quarterback as it is on Hoover himself.
8. Jayden Maiava, USC
2025 Stats: 65.8% completion rate, 3,711 yards, 24 touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 157.8 efficiency rating
Maiava is electric and one of the most exciting players to watch in the country. He’s also damn good, ranking behind only Mendoza in QBR and throwing for the fifth-most yards in the nation last season. That marked a major step up from preseason expectations as he cut down on the mistakes he made in his four starts in 2025. He also can’t exactly be blamed for his defense allowing 34 points or more in each of the Trojans’ regular-season losses. Maiava did benefit greatly from having two NFL wideouts (Makai Lemon and Ja’Kobi Lane) as his top targets, though Lincoln Riley’s teams never seem to be hurting for pass-catchers. The real question will be if Maiava can step up against the Big Ten’s best consistently and not just beat up on the bad teams.
7. Demond Williams Jr., Washington
2025 Stats: 69.5% completion rate, 3,065 yards, 25 touchdowns, eight interceptions, 161.0 efficiency rating
How Jedd Fisch is able to keep the locker room after Williams tried to escape his contract at Washington could determine if the third-year quarterback is actually capable of landing this high on the list. He’s a special dual-threat player, and his production rivaled that of Dante Moore, who outdueled him during rivalry week in 2025. Like many of the young quarterbacks in this range, there were some duds against top competition. Washington averaged just 9.3 points per game against Ohio State, Michigan, Wisconsin and Oregon (all losses) compared to a whopping 41.5 points against its other nine opponents. Williams took a few too many sacks (31) last season, so would be wise to cozy back up to his offensive linemen above all else before Week 1.
4. Dante Moore, Oregon
2025 Stats: 71.8% completion percentage, 3,565 yards, 30 touchdowns, 10 interceptions, 163.7 efficiency rating
Moore could have left for the NFL and been a first-round pick, but may have felt that there were some goals still on the table in Eugene. And few endings could have been as sour as the 56–22 rout at the hands of Indiana, a game in which Moore turned the ball over three times in the first half. He also put together a poor outing against Indiana the first go-around and struggled mightily on a rainy night in Iowa City (though he delivered when it mattered most in the fourth quarter). And though he similarly beat up on bad opponents, Moore torched Penn State on the road and carved up USC in a consequential late November game. Important to note: 2025 was his first true year as a starter. The arm ability is there, the decision-making should improve and a slightly better season against top defenses should make Moore and the Ducks national title contenders.
2. Julian Sayin, Ohio State
2025 Stats: 77.0% completion rate, 3,610 yards, 32 touchdowns, eight interceptions, 177.5 efficiency rating
Statistically, Sayin leaps off the page for his efficiency. He led FBS in completion percentage by 4.6 percentage points, trailed only Mendoza in passer rating and did so while still averaging 9.2 yards per attempt (sixth nationally). Is that all just because he had Jeremiah Smith and Carnell Tate catching passes? That’s surely part of the equation but belittles Sayin’s legitimate ability to pick apart defenses and make the right throws. The next step up would be doing so against Top 10 opponents. In the Buckeyes’ last two games against Indiana and Miami, Sayin took 10 sacks, threw three interceptions and couldn’t deliver when Ohio State needed him most. He might have gotten some grace in 2025 in his first year as a starter, but critics this season will be far less forgiving.