header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 987185 times)

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7035
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5824 on: Today at 09:46:54 AM »
Pharmacy??
must be considering community college degrees that get you counting pills and filling bottle


Unless you're a compounder, that's pretty much what pharmacists are.  I know a guy who was a compounder and got shut out by new federal regulations for clean-rooms a few years ago.  He and people like him couldn't afford those, so he had to just be a pill-counting monkey, as he called it.  Said he went to school and became a pharmacist to make compounds, that's what the real trade was, in his opinion.  Said any idiot can count pills and fill bottles, but that's all smaller, independent pharmacists can do now.   

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7035
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5825 on: Today at 09:48:09 AM »

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90478
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5826 on: Today at 10:15:35 AM »
Well, of course, I actually saw Texas at 11 and figured this was an attempt to rile up Texicans.  For me, rankings either are based on something objective, or are just opinions.  And the objective part can be subjective, like how variables are weighted.

Anyway, ...

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 7035
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5827 on: Today at 10:23:46 AM »
Most empirical lists, such as the ones @medinabuckeye1 posted about all-time various rankings, or all-time wins, or things like that, I've noticed LSU is routinely just outside the top 10.  In that 11-15 range.  They seem like decent ways to conceptualize a magical bullshit "Best Program In History" list.  If somebody wants to weight MNC's, fine, but I don't have any advice on how to do it.  

I forget, but I think Texas is usually in the top 10 of empirical lists.  

So I immediately saw LSU in the top 10, Texas outside of it, and didn't look any further.  Somebody threw a bunch of logos together and generated some clicks.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 27627
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5828 on: Today at 10:27:27 AM »
I can't see the list graphic that CD posted, sometimes on my work computer our firewall blocks various images and other external sources.  

But I'll assume from the responses that it's a slight to Texas.  And therefore I am suitably enraged and declare it to be "total bulljive."


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90478
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5829 on: Today at 10:27:38 AM »
Most empirical lists, such as the ones @medinabuckeye1 posted about all-time various rankings, or all-time wins, or things like that, I've noticed LSU is routinely just outside the top 10.  In that 11-15 range. 
Yeah, his stuff is very good, bearing in mind the AP rankings are ... what they are, but still, they are based on something tangible, and the rankings LOOK reasonable, to me.

Obviously the list of Blue Bloods is subjective, mostly, but I have most SEC elite programs just outside my own list.  LSU, UGA, Tenn, maybe Auburn, all quite good programs, but not historically elite.  I consider Texas and OU to be BBs.  OSU, USC, Nebbie, ND, UM, Bama ... PSU is just outside IMHO.  

But of course my list is also opinion.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90478
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5830 on: Today at 10:29:28 AM »
I can't see the list graphic that CD posted, sometimes on my work computer our firewall blocks various images and other external sources. 

But I'll assume from the responses that it's a slight to Texas.  And therefore I am suitably enraged and declare it to be "total bulljive."
They have Texas at 11 behind Florida, UGA, LSU ... the rest of the list is semi OK, I think, I didn't look hard.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 27627
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5831 on: Today at 10:32:12 AM »
They have Texas at 11 behind Florida, UGA, LSU ... the rest of the list is semi OK, I think, I didn't look hard.
For what?  All time "best program?"  All time "arrogant fans?"  I don't know the context of the list.  But if we're outside the Top 10 in "all time arrogant fans" then I'm even more angry.  We should at least be in the Top 5 for that one.

I believe Texas is in the top 7 or 8 in both all time wins and all time win percentage.  Those are typically the "objective" criteria one could use in order to rank all time best programs.


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 36843
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5832 on: Today at 10:36:39 AM »
Yeah, his stuff is very good, bearing in mind the AP rankings are ... what they are, but still, they are based on something tangible, and the rankings LOOK reasonable, to me.

Obviously the list of Blue Bloods is subjective, mostly, but I have most SEC elite programs just outside my own list.  LSU, UGA, Tenn, maybe Auburn, all quite good programs, but not historically elite.  I consider Texas and OU to be BBs.  OSU, USC, Nebbie, ND, UM, Bama ... PSU is just outside IMHO. 

But of course my list is also opinion.
I'd switch PSU and UNL. The latter has played its way out of the Bluebloods since 2001.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90478
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5833 on: Today at 10:45:33 AM »
For what?  All time "best program?" 
Claims to be that.  The one below might be accurate.



Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90478
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5834 on: Today at 11:42:00 AM »


Pretty good list, some others like The Professor are good also.  The Bird, Spaceman, All Rise ...

(Nick)name dropping: 25 best in MLB history

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 90478
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5835 on: Today at 11:44:33 AM »

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 36843
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5836 on: Today at 12:02:57 PM »
Not a single Badger on the list.

U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 24510
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5837 on: Today at 12:13:10 PM »
Claims to be that.  The one below might be accurate.



Most things like this, esp on FB, have purposeful mistakes to garner engagement.
The one thing people like to do even more than get mad and react is point out errors.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.