header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: OT: Obituaries Thread

 (Read 453304 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87020
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1358 on: Today at 11:02:20 AM »
The shooting to me didn't sound at all like a pro in any sense.  A 200 yard shot with a scoped 30.06 isn't a hard shot.   He left behind a ton of evidence.  Matter of time, I think his Dad convinced him he had to come in.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87020
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1359 on: Today at 11:03:05 AM »
Had you asked me 3 days ago who Charlie Kirk was, I'd have said no idea.  Name sounds vaguely familiar.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 24510
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1360 on: Today at 11:11:27 AM »
The shooting to me didn't sound at all like a pro in any sense.  A 200 yard shot with a scoped 30.06 isn't a hard shot.  He left behind a ton of evidence.  Matter of time, I think his Dad convinced him he had to come in. 
Yeah that was my thought as well.  I can make that shot. Not targeting a human, of course.

In fact I think it's likely that he was actually aiming for the head or heart and missed. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 33304
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1361 on: Today at 11:20:34 AM »
Yeah that was my thought as well.  I can make that shot. Not targeting a human, of course.

In fact I think it's likely that he was actually aiming for the head or heart and missed.
Aiming for the heart and missing high makes sense with that setup, actually.

Perhaps @Drew4UTk can weigh in as he has a lot of experience with rifles.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MaximumSam

  • Walk On
  • *
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 42
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1362 on: Today at 11:59:01 AM »
This is the first murder that made me feel really old

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2159
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1363 on: Today at 12:38:21 PM »
In fact I think it's likely that he was actually aiming for the head or heart and missed.
A virtual certainty. No "pro" would aim for the neck. They would aim for the head or the chest. He either missed low or high. Either way, I get really annoyed about all the chatter about "pro" or "sniper"...BS.

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11175
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1364 on: Today at 12:51:28 PM »
A virtual certainty. No "pro" would aim for the neck. They would aim for the head or the chest. He either missed low or high. Either way, I get really annoyed about all the chatter about "pro" or "sniper"...BS.
Agreed.  I saw someone claiming it was a pro/sniper who aimed for the neck in case Kirk was wearing body armor.  Ah, if that was the concern you'd aim for the head, no?  Just because the shot hit the neck doesn't mean it was aimed for the neck.  

I also saw a discussion of this "pro" adjusting for wind drift.  Seriously?  Was there a freaking hurricane in Utah that day?  

The same thing has always annoyed me with the Kennedy conspiracy theories.  Shooting a bolt action rifle at a barely moving target that is moving almost directly away from you isn't tough at that range.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87020
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1365 on: Today at 01:44:49 PM »
Normal body armor would be ineffective against high power rifle rounds.  You need ceramic plates to stop those rounds.  

Drew4UTk

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11549
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1366 on: Today at 01:49:45 PM »
Aiming for the heart and missing high makes sense with that setup, actually.

Perhaps @Drew4UTk can weigh in as he has a lot of experience with rifles.
Secrets of marksman and snipers (ask your son, badge) :

Any time you fire from an elevation the round strikes high.  You can't adjust dope to compensate- you have to use a hold (aiming lower or higher, left or right for that matter, defines a hold).

If the target is 200 real yards away and the angle is 20* below the shooter, the round will travel roughly 166yds gravity impacted yards and not 200 AND if firing downward, the round doesn't lose energy fighting gravity near as much.  This could easily account for a six inch deviation from intended impact and actual impact. 

Further muddy the waters:  a 20% increase in temperature allows for a full minute of angle rise.  Air is less dense. Opposite is true too.  A 20% increase in relative humidity drops it one MoA, taking away that added inch.  Again, opposite is true.  Crowds generate heat as do sun soaked surfaces.  Crowds also dispell humidity and strange turbulence.  Its is entirely conceivable the round encountered that environmental variable in flight to the target and skipped on its surface much like a rock can be skipped across water.  That would account for further elevation on impact vs intended impact. 

MaximumSam

  • Walk On
  • *
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 42
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1367 on: Today at 01:50:33 PM »
So the messages on the bullets are apparently references to Internet memes and the videogame Helldivers 2. Do with that what you will.

Drew4UTk

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11549
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1368 on: Today at 01:51:34 PM »
A virtual certainty. No "pro" would aim for the neck. They would aim for the head or the chest. He either missed low or high. Either way, I get really annoyed about all the chatter about "pro" or "sniper"...BS.
Bull shit.  That was my calling card.  A throat is damn hard to armor.  A miss high results in a head shot; a shot low results in a sucking chest wound.  

Get annoyed all you want... I lived that life several lifes ago. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87020
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1369 on: Today at 02:17:16 PM »
Humid air is less dense than dry air.  

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2159
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1370 on: Today at 02:26:36 PM »
Bull shit.  That was my calling card.  A throat is damn hard to armor.  A miss high results in a head shot; a shot low results in a sucking chest wound. 

Get annoyed all you want... I lived that life several lifes ago.
I learn something new every day. I very much doubt that 22-year old college dropout was aiming for the throat.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 48870
  • Liked:
Re: OT: Obituaries Thread
« Reply #1371 on: Today at 03:18:35 PM »
really don't think it matters a bit, what he was aiming at
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.