header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Weather, Climate, Environment, and Energy

 (Read 518132 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71185
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4970 on: June 25, 2021, 10:14:11 AM »
Nuclear would be fine, but there are no serious plans to build any more in the US today (two are UC).  Unless "we" change the rules on licensure etc., another nuke here would be decades off.  Not really much help.

If there is a practicable "solution" here, it has to include nuclear for base load.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37407
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4971 on: June 25, 2021, 10:28:23 AM »
decades off would be better than going all in on wind and solar

IMO
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17625
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4972 on: June 25, 2021, 10:32:00 AM »
decades off would be better than going all in on wind and solar

IMO
Hey, speaking of weather, could you please call off the storms in Nebraska and let's get some baseball games in?

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71185
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4973 on: June 25, 2021, 12:16:55 PM »
We could actually build nuclear plants fairly quickly, but we'd have to streamline licensing of course and probably focus on one design.  When we build say 737s, they are all the same (for a while, then they build 737-200s etc.).  If we had a standardized power reactor design, it's a matter of duplication.  Once you sort out siting and funding, the rest should be easy (relatively).

It already produces 20% of our electricity with about 100 power reactors, we "COULD" double that in a decade with some significant effort.  That would at least replace coal, our dirtiest fuel.  We'd still have NG emissions, but it's a lot better than coal.  I could get behind that plan, but it's obviously not practicable.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4974 on: June 25, 2021, 12:30:29 PM »
Yeah, what I said, you build a dam and divert the river into a lake.  Simple.
There are many other ways to divert water.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71185
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4975 on: June 25, 2021, 01:03:11 PM »
Yeah, but I like dams.  They are cool.


utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17625
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4976 on: June 25, 2021, 01:29:10 PM »
badgerfan hates beaver







dams

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4977 on: June 25, 2021, 01:55:59 PM »
And Beavers.



Mr. Ryan DeVries
2088 Dagget
Pierson, MI 49339


Dear Mr. DeVries:

SUBJECT: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023-1 T11N, R10W, Sec. 20, Montcalm Count-,),

It has come to the attention of the Department of Environmental Quality that there has been recent unauthorized activity on the above referenced parcel of property.  You have been certified as the legal landowner and/or contractor who did the following unauthorized activity: Construction and maintenance of two wood debris dams across the outlet stream of Spring Pond.

A permit must be issued prior to the start of this type of activity.  A review of the Department's files show that no permits have been issued.  Therefore, the Department has determined that this activity is in violation of Part 301,.  Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws annotated.

The Department has been informed that one or both of the dams partially, failed during a recent rain event, causing debris dams and flooding at downstream locations.  We find that dams of this nature are inherently hazardous and cannot be permitted.  The Department therefore orders you to cease and desist all unauthorized activities at this location, and to restore the stream to a free-flow condition by removing all wood and brush forming the dams from the strewn channel.  All restoration work shall be completed no later than January 31, 1998.  Please notify this office when the restoration has been completed so that a follow-up site inspection may be scheduled by our staff.

Failure to comply with this request, or any further unauthorized activity on the site, may result in this case being referred for elevated enforcement action.

We anticipate and would appreciate your full cooperation in this matter.  Please feel free to contact me at this office if you have any questions.
 

Sincerely,
David L. Price
District Representative
Land and Water Management Division
616-356-0269

U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4978 on: June 25, 2021, 01:58:22 PM »


Dear Mr. Price:

Re: DEQ File No. 97-59-0023; T11N, R10W, Sec 20; Montcalm County

Your certified letter dated 12/17/97 has been handed to me to respond to.  You sent out a great deal of carbon copies to a lot of people, but you neglected to include their addresses.  You will, therefore, have to send them a copy of my response.

First of all, Mr. Ryan DeVries is not the legal landowner and/or contractor at 2088 Dagget, Pierson, Michigan - I am the legal owner and a couple of beavers are in the (State unauthorized) process of constructing and maintaining two wood "debris" dams across the outlet stream of my Spring Pond.  While I did not pay for, nor authorize their dam project, I think they would be highly offended you call their skillful use of natural building materials "debris".  I would like to challenge you to attempt to emulate their dam project any dam time and/or any dam place you choose.  I believe I can safely state there is no dam way you could ever match their dam skills, their dam resourcefulness, their dam ingenuity, their dam persistence, their dam determination and/or their dam work ethic.

As to your dam request the beavers first must fill out a dam permit prior to the start of this type of dam activity, my first dam question to you is: are you trying to discriminate against my Spring Pond  Beavers or do you require all dam beavers throughout this State to conform to said dam request?  If you are not discriminating against these particular beavers, please send me completed copies of all those other applicable beaver dam permits.  Perhaps we will see if there really is a dam violation of Part 301, Inland Lakes and Streams, of the Natural Resource and Environmental Protection Act, Act 451 of the Public Acts of 1994, being sections 324.30101 to 324.30113 of the Michigan Compiled Laws annotated.  My first concern is - aren't the dam beavers entitled to dam legal representation?  The Spring Pond Beavers are financially destitute and are unable to pay for said dam representation - so the State will have to provide them with a dam lawyer.

The Department's dam concern that either one or both of the dams failed during a recent rain event causing dam flooding is proof we should leave the dam Spring Pond Beavers alone rather than harassing them and calling their dam names.  If you want the dam stream "restored" to a dam free-flow condition - contact the dam beavers - but if you are going to arrest them (they obviously did not pay any dam attention to your dam letter -- being unable to read English) - be sure you read them their dam Miranda first.  As for me, I am not going to cause more dam flooding or dam debris jams by interfering with these dam builders.  If you want to hurt these dam beavers - be aware I am sending a copy of your dam letter and this response to PETA.  If your dam Department seriously finds all dams of this nature inherently hazardous and truly will not permit their existence in this dam State - I seriously hope you are not selectively enforcing this dam policy - or once again both I and the Spring Pond Beavers will scream prejudice!

In my humble opinion, the Spring Pond Beavers have a right to build their dam unauthorized dams as long as the sky is blue, the grass is green and water flows downstream.  They have more dam right than I to live and enjoy Spring Pond.  So, as far as I and the beavers are concerned, this dam case can be referred for more dam elevated enforcement action now.  Why wait until 1/31/98?  The Spring Pond Beavers may be under the dam ice then, and there will be no dam way for you or your dam staff to contact/harass them then.

In conclusion, I would like to bring to your attention a real environmental quality (health) problem; bears are actually defecating in our woods.  I definitely believe you should be persecuting the defecating bears and leave the dam beavers alone.   If you are going to investigate the beaver dam, watch your step!  (The bears are not careful where they dump!)


Being unable to comply with your dam request, and being unable to contact you on your dam answering machine, I am sending this response to your dam office.


U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

CatsbyAZ

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2774
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4979 on: June 28, 2021, 07:22:52 PM »
110-115F across the Pacific Northwest all week, which is insane. The construction sites I work off and on throughout the year in Portland is shutting down until next week.


https://twitter.com/ColleenWeather/status/1409598532617707520

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13062
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4980 on: June 28, 2021, 07:42:00 PM »
High of 114 in Portland today. Woof.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11230
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4981 on: June 28, 2021, 08:05:57 PM »
But it's a wet heat... 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17106
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4982 on: June 30, 2021, 09:17:31 AM »
High of 114 in Portland today. Woof.
Briskett weather
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17106
  • Liked:
Re: Weather, Climate, and Environment
« Reply #4983 on: June 30, 2021, 09:17:54 AM »
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.