header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 292116 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82502
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2632 on: July 07, 2024, 11:58:21 AM »


I have no clue ...

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2633 on: July 07, 2024, 03:35:19 PM »

If someone was tasked with defending this list, they'd sit silently.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2634 on: July 07, 2024, 03:38:12 PM »

So 5 transfers, 2 of which transferred twice, and a guy that's never started a regular season game.
Looks about right.  
Welcome to 2024.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31046
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2635 on: July 07, 2024, 04:42:54 PM »
If someone was tasked with defending this list, they'd sit silently.
I have a quibble. For RB's in the Alvarez to present, at Wisconsin.

Yes, Ron Dayne was great.

Gordon and Taylor were better.

Taylor was the best of the lot.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2636 on: July 07, 2024, 04:49:20 PM »
Right.
Taylor is the first RB to have a better 3-year resume than Walker.  Yet Walker is #1 and Taylor is.....nowhere.
Sanders is at #5, suggesting peak is important, but Gordon is....nowhere.

Staubach on any of these lists is lazy.
.
It's just a grab-bag of consensus guys in whatever order.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82502
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2637 on: July 07, 2024, 05:05:12 PM »
It’s some opinion from.   Bleacher report. 

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2638 on: July 07, 2024, 05:26:34 PM »
Someone should tell them I could replace their whole college football staff and save them a lot of money w/ better content.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82502
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2639 on: July 07, 2024, 05:27:45 PM »
Their objective is to get noticed.  To do that, you put out rankings with which folks disagree.  Then you are "relevant", somehow.

This is true for many such rankings.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82502
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2640 on: July 07, 2024, 06:16:50 PM »

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45434
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2641 on: July 07, 2024, 06:45:52 PM »
or Iowa or nebraska, but probably South Dakota
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2642 on: July 07, 2024, 08:25:56 PM »
Their objective is to get noticed.  To do that, you put out rankings with which folks disagree.  Then you are "relevant", somehow.

This is true for many such rankings.
Then I'd drive down their clicks/eyeballs with pride.  At least it would be genuine.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9341
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2643 on: July 07, 2024, 09:12:48 PM »
So 5 transfers, 2 of which transferred twice, and a guy that's never started a regular season game.
Looks about right. 
Welcome to 2024.
Hmmm. That's actually kinda interesting. 

So below is the list of first-year starters as full-time guys since the turn of the century. I'm not sure how to place a guy like Burrow, who was kinda fine as a first-year starter and then blew up. Lamar was somewhere between that and a first-year starter.

2003 - First-year starter

2007 - First-year starter
2010 - JuCo guy, first year as a starter at a 4-year school
2012 - First-year starter
2013 - First-year starter
2018 - First-year starter
2021 - First-year starter
2022 - First-year starter

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2644 on: July 07, 2024, 10:16:47 PM »
Hmmm. That's actually kinda interesting.

So below is the list of first-year starters as full-time guys since the turn of the century. I'm not sure how to place a guy like Burrow, who was kinda fine as a first-year starter and then blew up. Lamar was somewhere between that and a first-year starter.

2003 - First-year starter

2007 - First-year starter
2010 - JuCo guy, first year as a starter at a 4-year school
2012 - First-year starter
2013 - First-year starter
2018 - First-year starter
2021 - First-year starter
2022 - First-year starter

It's 'just' QB, but this is why rankings or ratings obsessed with returning starters is silly.  Yes, known is preferable to unknown, but it doesn't make it better.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45434
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2645 on: July 07, 2024, 10:47:38 PM »
The midwest state that has become a factory for developing NFL players ranks ahead of Texas, Florida, California and Ohio.

DOUG SAMUELS JUL 3, 2024

At a rate of 12.5 NFL players per million residents, Iowa ranks just below states like Georgia (12.6), Alabama (12.7), and a bit further behind the national leaders of churning out NFL talent like Mississippi (14.5) and Louisiana (15).

https://footballscoop.com/news/theres-a-very-surprising-midwest-state-churning-out-nfl-talent

According to the data, the national average per state is 5.2 NFL players per million residents. States right around that national average include Michigan (5.4), North Carolina (5.7), and Texas (5.7).

Other relative surprises from the data:

Nebraska ranking higher than Texas (6.1)
Hawaii and Florida with the same (7.5)
Vermont is the only state with zero current NFL players
New Hampshire, Maine, Rhode Island all under 1 NFL player per million residents
Alaska (2.7) with a better figure than Arkansas (2.3), Washington (2.2), and North Dakota (2.6)
Georgia has FOUR times the number of NFL players as New York despite half the population.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.