header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 291292 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2492 on: July 01, 2024, 12:15:50 PM »
I tend not to follow recruiting very much, I figure the coaches will deal with it.  Something will pop out on FB when they get a commit, OK fine, maybe he'll sign, maybe he'll be good, maybe whatever.  As some here opined, recruiting today is "almost meaningless".

I wouldn't go that far of course.  It means something pretty substantial I think, it obviously is not quite a singular as once it was.

I  gather De Bore is holding up this end pretty well.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31042
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2493 on: July 01, 2024, 12:21:19 PM »
Rutgers and Wisconsin are high because of volume. Both classes are nearly full.

247 rankings are based on a combination of volume and quality. As of today, UW has only four 4* players on 247 (five on Rivals). UW has 21 commitments.

OSU also has 21 commits. Three 5* and 14 4*.

Big difference.

Here are the ratings (247) by average player rankings.

2025 Recruit Football Team Rankings (247sports.com)
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45432
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2494 on: July 01, 2024, 12:27:38 PM »
Rutgers with (6) 4-stars
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31042
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2495 on: July 01, 2024, 01:13:00 PM »
Rutgers with (6) 4-stars
Schiano is doing a good job of keeping those 4* NJ kids home.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2496 on: July 01, 2024, 04:57:45 PM »
The world's most liveable cities for 2024 listed in new report (fox5atlanta.com)
The world's most liveable cities for 2024 listed in new report (fox5atlanta.com)

I guess affordability wasn't much of a factor in this.

Rankings of the best cities to live in the U.S.
  • Honolulu, Hawaii (overall ranking: 23)
  • Atlanta, Georgia (overall ranking: 29)
  • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (overall ranking: 30)
  • Seattle, Washington (overall ranking: 34)
  • Washington D.C. (overall ranking: 38)
  • Chicago, Illinois (overall ranking: 39)
  • Boston, Massachusetts (overall ranking: 45)
  • Miami, Florida (overall ranking: 47)
  • San Francisco, California (overall ranking: 49)
  • Minneapolis, Minnesota (overall ranking: 50)


utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2497 on: July 01, 2024, 05:06:01 PM »
Yes, yes. Everyone should move to Honolulu and Atlanta!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2498 on: July 01, 2024, 05:11:20 PM »
I really really don't understand the US cities ranking, but whatever.  

If I were talking about larger cities, I'd include San Diego at least, and probably Salt Lake City, and Columbus, Ohio.  I'd put in Boston and Atlanta, OK there.  What about Tampa?  I haven't spent much time there.

Nashville?

Ft. Worth?

Albequerque?  


bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9341
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2499 on: July 01, 2024, 10:07:51 PM »
I really really don't understand the US cities ranking, but whatever. 

If I were talking about larger cities, I'd include San Diego at least, and probably Salt Lake City, and Columbus, Ohio.  I'd put in Boston and Atlanta, OK there.  What about Tampa?  I haven't spent much time there.

Nashville?

Ft. Worth?

Albequerque? 


From the one week I’ve been there, the Tampa area seemed better than Tampa itself. Not bad, but I’d take St Pete’s over it.

Nashville it’s a little too congested for its own good. And it’s best known area is kind of bad. Elsewhere are some pretty good spots.

Isn’t Fort Worth just more Dallas?

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45432
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2500 on: July 01, 2024, 10:43:51 PM »
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 6034
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2501 on: July 01, 2024, 11:14:09 PM »
I'm no water carrier for TX but Fort Worth should never be described as more Dallas, or anything like Dallas.

Personally, I like Ft Worth and the people there will tell you straight up, that they ain't Dallas.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2502 on: July 02, 2024, 12:01:47 AM »
Fort Worth ain't no Dallas that's for sure.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2503 on: July 02, 2024, 04:04:34 AM »
Yeah, Tampa isn't great, but Tampa adjacent is.


Would anyone honestly rather live in Chicago than Miami?  Huh??
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2504 on: July 02, 2024, 07:42:30 AM »
We traveled around the US looking for places to retire and considered a few fairly seriously, including Las Vegas.  My wife wanted hot weather, so that narrowed things down a lot.  I wanted low taxes.  But a place to retire is of course different from a place to raise a family, or be a young couple, etc.

Minneaspolic seemed decent the two times I was there.

Houston seemed like one enormous strip mall outside downtown.


bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9341
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #2505 on: July 02, 2024, 08:32:21 AM »
Fort Worth ain't no Dallas that's for sure.
May I request an education in the differences? (I fully cop that my only Fort Worth experience was leaving DFW and driving right to a barbecue restaurant, eating there and then driving out of town)

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.