I haven't seen it, but man, this seems really odd. I guess we'll see how things go down in the long haul (hopefully well!) but in the short view this seems like more of a cowtow to public pressure as opposed to being based in any sound principles or decisions.
For example, the report indicates both Smith and Meyer thought in good faith they didn't need to report because there was no arrest. However, Urban did report to his supervisor. It goes out of its way to say that if Urban thought there was domestic abuse he would have fired Smith.
I dunno, I'm strongly against weird half measures just to appease the public. That is definitely a result of working in criminal defense and seeing how people are treated as a result of that attitude. Right now, this seems like a weird half-measure to appease the public, as opposed to being based in any kind of principle or morality.