CFB51 College Football Fan Community

The Power Five => Big Ten => Topic started by: Kris61 on August 01, 2018, 10:55:55 AM

Title: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Kris61 on August 01, 2018, 10:55:55 AM
https://thespun.com/news/brett-mcmurphy-urban-meyer-zach-smith-allegations (https://thespun.com/news/brett-mcmurphy-urban-meyer-zach-smith-allegations)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 10:57:59 AM
Trouble?  Bad PR for sure.  A very awkward press conference.  I doubt anything beyond that.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Kris61 on August 01, 2018, 11:05:17 AM
Trouble?  Bad PR for sure.  A very awkward press conference.  I doubt anything beyond that.
Hmm. Maybe. But this is a really bad look.  Meyer said he knew nothing of allegations against Smith in 2015.  McMurphy has text messages between Smith’s wife and Meyer’s wife where Shelley Meyer is urging her to leave him because of the abuse.
We’ll see.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 01, 2018, 11:06:22 AM
it's a different world than it was in 2015
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 11:12:53 AM
Yeah I think we are finding that out across all mediums.  I'm not talking about the Harvey Weinstein stuff, but people having old Tweets dragged out.  I think the days of coaches being able to put blinders on while the police "handle" stuff is over.  Hell, I remember the drug officer in 1995 telling a room full of 5th graders that the standing orders for UM/Ann Arbor police officers, when he was on the beat in the 70s and 80s was that if he picked up a UM football player, you absolutely did not book him, or take him to jail.  You took him straight to Bo's house, and he handled it.  He didn't tell it in a "can you believe this?" but in a "this is funny" kind of way, and not to people at a private dinner party, but to a room full of public school children.

I think a lot of these coaches grew up in that mentality.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 01, 2018, 11:17:25 AM
Hmm. Maybe. But this is a really bad look.  Meyer said he knew nothing of allegations against Smith in 2015.  McMurphy has text messages between Smith’s wife and Meyer’s wife where Shelley Meyer is urging her to leave him because of the abuse.
We’ll see.
I agree.  It looks bad.   The coverage of domestic abuse is at an all time high (thankfully).   He won't be fired, but this will follow him for a while.  I'd suspect ESPN digs in now...   he's not in the SEC anymore.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 11:23:07 AM
I agree.  It looks bad.   The coverage of domestic abuse is at an all time high (thankfully).   He won't be fired, but this will follow him for a while.  I'd suspect ESPN digs in now...   he's not in the SEC anymore.
Particularly with the ongoing story of the athletic doctor sexually abusing athletes.
Feels familiar.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: mcwterps1 on August 01, 2018, 11:28:45 AM
Not near as bad as deals with handlers and recruiting murderers  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 12:00:31 PM
Story is on the front page of the MSN home page now.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 01, 2018, 12:05:03 PM
IMHO the question is whether everyone just clams up to protect Urban or not. Unless they can *prove* that Shelley told Urban, they can't prove he knew.

I realize there's TONS of circumstantial evidence, but circumstantial evidence vs. Urban Meyer's record and value to OSU? Unless the PR world comes down on OSU like nothing else, I see them circling the wagons and trying to let this blow over. 

But if it's proven that he knew, beyond a shadow of a doubt, I'm not sure they'll be able to protect him. Not in 2018. Especially if he got on a microphone and blatantly lied about it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on August 01, 2018, 12:07:03 PM
Not... not good. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 01, 2018, 12:20:04 PM
2 qualifiers then a rant.

1) Yes I think Meyer is trouble for this. if it's just this and blows over I think the coaching staff attends a "whistleblower" seminar, and Meyer donates a sum of money to abuse prevention charity type thing.
2) Abuse is horrible, and I'm glad we as a society are becoming more aware of it, and trying to prevent and report on it.

Rant: I get annoyed with the highest profile guy is set up as the scapegoat. Why isn't Shelly getting investigated? How about Mrs. Smith others friends? Reporters are targeting Meyer to get the clicks, and I don't think that's how it should be.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 01, 2018, 12:26:51 PM
Rant: I get annoyed with the highest profile guy is set up as the scapegoat. Why isn't Shelly getting investigated? How about Mrs. Smith others friends? Reporters are targeting Meyer to get the clicks, and I don't think that's how it should be.


Shelly would be investigated until she told investigators she passed this along to the head coach.  This may have taken about 10 minutes.  Shelly wouldn't be in the spotlight if she took this to Urban.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 12:27:43 PM
Rant: I get annoyed with the highest profile guy is set up as the scapegoat. Why isn't Shelly getting investigated? How about Mrs. Smith others friends? Reporters are targeting Meyer to get the clicks, and I don't think that's how it should be.


Did Shelly or Mrs. Smith's other friends get in front of the media and tell everyone they didn't know?
It's very possible Urb didn't know. Maybe his wife doesn't tell him everything (not healthy, in my opinion, but possible).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 01, 2018, 12:38:02 PM
He definitely has some questions to answer.  Brett McMurphy's report is a loosey goosey with legal details - Smith apparently wasn't arrested or charged in 2015 with anything, as far as I can tell, and reports originally said he was, so Urban would be right to say that's wrong. 

That being said, Smith sounds like a psycho, Urban's own wife is texting saying she is scared of him.  He had a history of domestic violence and Urban apparently heard that it was still a problem.  Why in the hell would you keep him on staff at that point?

In any event, here is a public service message on domestic violence.  It's easy to say just fire the guy, but this often harms the victim and puts people in a very awkward position.  If you remember, Ray Rice's wife was out doing work trying to get him rehired, because she's married to the guy and him losing a seven figure job isn't something she wants.  You see that in this report, too - him losing his job would hurt the victim (who was financially able to stay home with her children due to his employment).  This enabled the domestic violence, but also is something that isn't lost on the other people around the situation.

In any event, Urban is going to get called to the carpet and he needs to answer what was going on.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 01, 2018, 12:49:32 PM
Urban isn’t a scapegoat, he just finally got caught lying on something big. He’s been lying to people since he was at BG. For dishonest people, it becomes a way of life. Dude is an amazing football coach. One of the best ever. Not an amazing human being.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 01, 2018, 01:02:53 PM
Story is on the front page of the MSN home page now.
this still exists, and is viewed by adults, knowingly?


Serious note:  DV cases are often as complicated as it gets in the criminal law world.  The amount of haze, ambiguity, volatility, inconsistency, recanting, hypocrisy, reciprocity, etc. is something else.  

It is rarely as simple as Man smacks Woman,  law enforcement contacted, Man arrested,  Man pleads guilty, or Man is found guilty.   I didn't really appreciate this until my tour in the DAs office, and I wondered,  hmm, why are there 2 Full Time  DV victim witness coordinators on staff.     Their job (very important) is, among other things,  part BS detector, determine veracity, part investigator,  emotional support specialist, witness prep, other people skills. 

These points don't necessarily go to Urban Meyer's role in any of this, just to highlight that the fact pattern of a DV case can come in innumerable shapes/sizes.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: iahawk15 on August 01, 2018, 01:15:24 PM
this still exists, and is viewed by adults, knowingly?
It's my parents' home page, smh. I did, however, successfully covert them from IE to Chrome.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 01, 2018, 01:29:09 PM
Rant: I get annoyed with the highest profile guy is set up as the scapegoat. Why isn't Shelly getting investigated? How about Mrs. Smith others friends? Reporters are targeting Meyer to get the clicks, and I don't think that's how it should be.
Well, I think the McMurphy article does point out that as an OSU employee, she may have culpability for not reporting this about another OSU employee, due to Title IX. For example, at my work, any manager who learns of sexual harrassment is required to report it. It doesn't matter if someone tells you "don't tell anyone, I'm just confiding in you", you have to take it to HR anyway. There may be some culpability for her because she works for the organization as well. 
However, beyond that, I'm not entirely sure what you expect her to do... She doesn't have control over Z. Smith's employment. Urban does. If she didn't work for OSU, she may have a moral obligation to do something, but not a legal obligation. She's not the one with the power to protect Z. Smith. Urban is. 
If someone I know personally comes to me with tales of assault, and neither the victim nor the assailant works for my company, it's not my legal responsibility to report that to the assailant's employer. It just isn't. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 01, 2018, 01:49:06 PM
Columbus Radio is now dropping Mrs. Smith sound bites.
She sent pictures of the abuse to her parents, and his parents. The parents came back with "Don't go to the Police."
She was asked point blank if she confirmed Shelley took this to Urban. She could not confirm.

But went on to condemn the Meyer's for only offering support, and counselling but not taking to the authorities. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 01, 2018, 01:50:55 PM
Also from Radio, the Police report filed in Powell didn't contain Zach Smith's name.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 01:54:42 PM
this still exists, and is viewed by adults, knowingly?


My personal email is Hotmail (been so for 10+ years) and that page takes my directly to it. So, yes.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 01:55:40 PM
Trouble?  Bad PR for sure.  A very awkward press conference.  I doubt anything beyond that.
disagree.
the climate has changed in this country. big time. #MeToo movement is out for blood and the media sensationalizes everything. this could potentially roast his ass.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 01, 2018, 02:01:35 PM
Urban isn’t a scapegoat, he just finally got caught lying on something big. He’s been lying to people since he was at BG. For dishonest people, it becomes a way of life. Dude is an amazing football coach. One of the best ever. Not an amazing human being.

I don't know enough details to confirm or deny BG lying. I thought he was an arrogant SOB while at Florida, and didn't like his hire at OSU. 
Perhaps it's my scarlett tinted glasses, but I had thought he had mellowed since his arrival here. (Family first / health first contract with kids.)
I will concur with the opinion of "One of the Best coaches, not an amazing human being." (Though with that caveat, he has used his power and fiances to some good things.)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 02:01:50 PM
disagree.
the climate has changed in this country. big time. #MeToo movement is out for blood and the media sensationalizes everything. this could potentially roast his ass.
We'll see.  The "media" that covers sports also televises games, and has a vested interest in a good Ohio State.  As of 30 minutes ago ESPN had no mention of it on their site, not even on the college football page.  Their #1 story was the mishandling of a sex assault report at Idaho.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Kris61 on August 01, 2018, 02:05:58 PM
Legally, Meyer isn’t required to fire him or even contact the authorities (at least that I know of).

What is going to take him down is lying about it.  It’s a PR nightmare.  You can’t say you knew nothing about it when your wife had pictures of the abuse on her phone. And no, no one is going to believe his wife didn’t tell him.

There are other texts from other coaches’ wives that say things like, “Urban doesn’t know what to do.”

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Kris61 on August 01, 2018, 02:11:15 PM
We'll see.  The "media" that covers sports also televises games, and has a vested interest in a good Ohio State.  As of 30 minutes ago ESPN had no mention of it on their site, not even on the college football page.  Their #1 story was the mishandling of a sex assault report at Idaho.
ESPN is about the only outlet in the country not reporting it now. McMurphy was just on ESPNU radio poking fun at his former employer for not going with it.
I’ve been listening to radio all day. The hosts of all the shows say they don’t see how Meyer survives this.  At this point I think I agree with them.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 02:13:02 PM
We'll see.  The "media" that covers sports also televises games, and has a vested interest in a good Ohio State.  As of 30 minutes ago ESPN had no mention of it on their site, not even on the college football page.  Their #1 story was the mishandling of a sex assault report at Idaho.
the media that covers sports is insignificant compared to the media that regular everyday people consume. It really is.
if this firestorm hits CNN/FOX/MSNBC/ABC/CBS - he's going to have a tough time surviving that kind of heat.
Apparently he only put up with that clown Zach Smith for so long because Smith is Earl Bruce's grandson, and Urban and Bruce were extremely close. Urban has said many times Bruce was like his 2nd father. Kinda feel bad for Urban to be honest. He was only loyal to that clown Smith because of his love for the guys' grandfather. Smith is a total pos.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 01, 2018, 02:19:36 PM
Quote
Legally, Meyer isn’t required to fire him or even contact the authorities (at least that I know of).

That may not be true, dependent on Title IX. 

And as I said, even if there is no criminal justice requirement that he doesn't report it, there may be OSU internal rules that he's violated by not taking this to his superiors (assuming he, in fact, knew). 


Quote
What is going to take him down is lying about it.  It’s a PR nightmare.  You can’t say you knew nothing about it when your wife had pictures of the abuse on her phone. And no, no one is going to believe his wife didn’t tell him.

Correct. No one is going to believe him. But given his coaching talent, it's questionable whether he'll get fired if there's no actual proof. The public will likely be out for blood, but if he survives the next few weeks with the "I didn't know" mantra and there's no proof, eventually it will blow over. The public doesn't have enough stamina to keep these things up all that long.

Quote
There are other texts from other coaches’ wives that say things like, “Urban doesn’t know what to do.”
Objection, your honor: hearsay!

Objection sustained: the evidence is inadmissible. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 01, 2018, 02:20:58 PM
He was only loyal to that clown Smith because of his love for the guys' grandfather. 
poor reasoning
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 01, 2018, 02:22:18 PM
I saw the photos of what was done to Smith's wife. I concur Zach Smith is a POS. glad he was fired.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 01, 2018, 02:25:29 PM
I saw the photos of what was done to Smith's wife. I concur Zach Smith is a POS. glad he was fired.
yeah, it looked pretty bad.
there's finally a small link on espn about it. it took some looking though.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Kris61 on August 01, 2018, 02:30:20 PM
That may not be true, dependent on Title IX.

And as I said, even if there is no criminal justice requirement that he doesn't report it, there may be OSU internal rules that he's violated by not taking this to his superiors (assuming he, in fact, knew).


Correct. No one is going to believe him. But given his coaching talent, it's questionable whether he'll get fired if there's no actual proof. The public will likely be out for blood, but if he survives the next few weeks with the "I didn't know" mantra and there's no proof, eventually it will blow over. The public doesn't have enough stamina to keep these things up all that long.
Objection, your honor: hearsay!

Objection sustained: the evidence is inadmissible.
Objection your honor works in a courtroom. Not in the court of public opinion. And this is the arena that Ohio St is in with this decision.
Idk. I think this is looking bad for Urby right now.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 02:31:57 PM
poor reasoning
any other guy, I think Urban would've gotten rid of him a long time ago. Really think he kept that dipshit around out of loyalty/love for Bruce.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 01, 2018, 02:46:40 PM
Urban knew. It’s clear his wife, and a number of others in the coaching circle did, so I find it impossible he didn’t.

What I am flummoxed by though, is why work so hard to keep Zach Smith? Slightly above average recruiter and below average coach. Was the relationship with Coach Bruce that powerful to risk what has now come to light?

What is also clear to me is that it’s hard to hide much these days with our electronic footprints of texting, social media, etc. You will get bitten eventually.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 02:51:59 PM
What I am flummoxed by though, is why work so hard to keep Zach Smith? Slightly above average recruiter and below average coach. Was the relationship with Coach Bruce that powerful to risk what has now come to light?
it's the relationship with Bruce. Smith was a terrible WR coach and a complete ass clown. Everyone of his WR's went to the NFL not knowing how to run routes. They all had to be taught. ONLY reason he kept him around was bc he was Bruce's grandson.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 01, 2018, 02:53:27 PM
Idk. I think this is looking bad for Urby right now.
I agree. As I said, if he survives the next few weeks, though, he'll survive. I believe the American public will be distracted by the next shiny thing and if he makes it through that, he's in the clear. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 02:53:33 PM
Urban knew. It’s clear his wife, and a number of others in the coaching circle did, so I find it impossible he didn’t.

What I am flummoxed by though, is why work so hard to keep Zach Smith? Slightly above average recruiter and below average coach. Was the relationship with Coach Bruce that powerful to risk what has now come to light?

What is also clear to me is that it’s hard to hide much these days with our electronic footprints of texting, social media, etc. You will get bitten eventually.
It goes back to what I said about what the cop said about how things were handled in Ann Arbor under Bo.  I think this is simply always the way it's been, and guys didn't really think about it like they were taking a risk.  They were simply doing things the way they've always been done.  The most damning evidence so far against Izzo is that he kpe a former player/unpaid grad assistant on after being accused of punching a girl in a bar, and that was my first thought.  This isn't some star player or big time assistant.  It's not even A player or AN assistant.  Why risk it for a grad assistant?  The only logical answer is these guys have operated one way for decades and didn't know to operate any differently.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 01, 2018, 03:11:06 PM
yeah, it looked pretty bad.
there's finally a small link on espn about it. it took some looking though.
it's the top headline now

big trouble

The 2009 and 2015 accusations came to light last month, when Zach Smith was charged with criminal trespassing after dropping his children off at Courtney Smith's home, which led to his firing as wide receivers coach on July 24.

Hah, he wasn't fired for criminal trespassing.  He was fired for 2009-2015 and everything put together.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 03:35:36 PM
it's starting to pop on the on the top pages of the sites everywhere.....

https://www.thedailybeast.com/texts-reveal-ohio-states-urban-meyer-knew-his-aide-abused-wife-in-2015-report?source=articles&via=rss

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/report-urban-meyer-knew-about-2015-domestic-violence-incident-involving-ex-assistant/

https://sports.yahoo.com/urban-meyer-knew-osu-coachs-alleged-domestic-violence-nothing-deserves-fired-174323593.html

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/24255877/people-meyer-knew-15-case

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bigten/2018/08/01/urban-meyer-knew-abuse-claims-ohio-state-assistant-zach-smith/880995002/
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 01, 2018, 03:36:40 PM
it's the top headline now

big trouble

The 2009 and 2015 accusations came to light last month, when Zach Smith was charged with criminal trespassing after dropping his children off at Courtney Smith's home, which led to his firing as wide receivers coach on July 24.

Hah, he wasn't fired for criminal trespassing.  He was fired for 2009-2015 and everything put together.
The semantics nerd in my wants to argue “led to” grants the leeway for all that. He history doesn’t come up without the charge. 
I think ESPN probably held back becuase of pettiness with Brett. Too bad. It does remind me a lot of folks were convinced that network just hated OSU at one point.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 03:37:41 PM
So... Kevin Wilson, or Greg Schiano?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 03:40:16 PM
I think ESPN probably held back becuase of pettiness with Brett. Too bad. It does remind me a lot of folks were convinced that network just hated OSU at one point.
I'd bet it's 100% that considering ESPN fired McMurphy and he's went on to break more stories by himself than all of the sports "journalists" at ESPN have combined since his firing. They are just being petty with an ex-employee.
He's released the photos of what Smith did to his ex-wife and the screen shots of the texts messages between Smith's ex-wife and Shelly Meyer and other coaches wives on that staff. They are pretty damning.
Urban's seat is going to get white hot. We'll see if he can survive this. I have my doubts.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 03:42:14 PM
So... Kevin Wilson, or Greg Schiano?
Wilson has too much baggage.
Schiano would probably get the interim tag if it came to that and then be kept around or not depending on how he did in 2018.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 01, 2018, 03:42:46 PM
Lynch mob has been activated so Urban better watch out.

So sick of this BS.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hoss on August 01, 2018, 03:43:56 PM
So... Kevin Wilson, or Greg Schiano?
I think they need to make a political correction hire...somebody known for their ethics, good credibility on women's issues, and experience in the BIG is always a plus. 
(https://image.oregonlive.com/home/olive-media/width960/img/beavers_impact/photo/mike-rileyjpg-fdf162ad6d2b5166.jpg)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 01, 2018, 03:48:02 PM
When we get to something like this, I try to think on the structure of the thing.

There will always be a gap between what we know and what we don’t. People will often fill that gap with their feelings, whether positive, negative, attacking or defensive. We will never know much for certain. There will likely not be enough “proof” to satisfy those who are skeptical, as skepticism usually rises past most burdens of proof. The burden of “proof” is also not a standard in argument, unless it suits someone. 

In this case, Urban either knew or he should’ve known, or made a point of not knowing, which conflicts with the should’ve part. Head coaches are responsible for a lot, they talk to a lot of folks, have a lot of folks tracking other folks. They can find out who goes to what bar, which kid is going home with too many girls, et al. This was an employee, and a close family friend. Coaches by nature are usually not hands of within their fiefdoms. It reminds me of the Dana Altman mess, where he said things that were sort of preposterous. 

But Altman is still employed. My gut is Urban will weather it, games will start and it will go as it does, same as happened to Dana. On the other hand, if you told me in a month he wasn’t the coach, I wouldn’t be surprised. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 03:48:44 PM
it's starting to pop on the on the top pages of the sites everywhere.....

https://www.thedailybeast.com/texts-reveal-ohio-states-urban-meyer-knew-his-aide-abused-wife-in-2015-report?source=articles&via=rss

https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/report-urban-meyer-knew-about-2015-domestic-violence-incident-involving-ex-assistant/

https://sports.yahoo.com/urban-meyer-knew-osu-coachs-alleged-domestic-violence-nothing-deserves-fired-174323593.html

http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/24255877/people-meyer-knew-15-case

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/bigten/2018/08/01/urban-meyer-knew-abuse-claims-ohio-state-assistant-zach-smith/880995002/
Just judging off the taglines, every one says Urban knew, except ESPN says people close to Urban knew.  That actually might be right, but it's funny
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 01, 2018, 03:49:00 PM
So... Kevin Wilson, or Greg Schiano?
Gawd Badge, you know how to turn the knife.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 01, 2018, 03:49:23 PM
Lynch mob has been activated so Urban better watch out.

So sick of this BS.
What sort of BS?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 03:49:31 PM
Lynch mob has been activated so Urban better watch out.

So sick of this BS.
I don't think it's BS.
Jim Tressel was fired for less than what Urban is accused of. Tressel lied to the NCAA about free tats. BFD.
IF it is proven that Urban enabled and covered for a wife beating POS like Zach Smith and then lied about, he should be canned if Tressel was.
Covering for tattoos and a little cash vs. covering for beating women. You tell me which one is worse. I'll hang up and listen.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 03:51:50 PM
Just judging off the taglines, every one says Urban knew, except ESPN says people close to Urban knew.  That actually might be right, but it's funny
there are texts from other coaches wives saying Urban doens't know what to do. There are texts from Shelly Meyer saying she's going to talk to Urban.
He knew. HIGHLY DOUBT his wife of 30 years never told him.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 03:52:49 PM
Gawd Badge, you know how to turn the knife.

Wasn't meant that way. Just thinking that this one is over.
https://sports.yahoo.com/
It's everywhere now.
But, as MDot stated, Wilson has his own baggage. And Schiano has that Penn State stuff.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 01, 2018, 03:54:33 PM
What BS?

Head hunting for someone who broke no laws or rules.  

Did the police know?  I guess so since they were called multiple times.  Why wasn’t Smith prosecuted?  Go after the dickhead who let that slide.  Its not the head coaches job to enforce the law.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 03:56:21 PM
Head hunting for someone who broke no laws or rules.  Did the police know?  I guess so since they were called multiple times.  Why wasn’t Smith prosecuted?  Go after the dickhead who let that slide.  Its not the head coaches job to enforce the law.
No. But it is the head coaches job not to employ people that beat their wives.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 01, 2018, 04:04:07 PM
No. But it is the head coaches job not to employ people that beat their wives.
Well maybe if Smith had been convicted of abuse Urban would have fired him?  Firing  someone who your wife says is bad might not be too smart if that and other BS is all you have.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 04:08:57 PM
Times have changed. 10 years ago - hell, two years ago - this wouldn't get any press.


The key is the lying part. If he knew, and it sure looks like it, he's gotta go. Sorry.


Had he come out last week or whatever and said, "Yes, I knew about it, but I was trying to protect the family from going broke and yada yada", he'd have looked a lot better than the potential outcome now. He could recovered from that. Take a little heat then versus an inferno now. Seems simple.



DON'T LIE!! EVAR!!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 04:09:37 PM
Well maybe if Smith had been convicted of abuse Urban would have fired him?  Firing  someone who your wife says is bad might not be too smart if that and other BS is all you have.
the ex-wife sent pics and screen shots of text messages of some of the beatings and threats that POS Smith sent to her. Meyer's wife said to the ex-wife that Zach Smith scares her, and asked her if she had a restraining order. Give me a break with this BS. Just because he wasn't convicted means nothing. That POS douchebag was beating a 115 pound woman and he got away with it. He lost his job only when Urban couldn't cover for him anymore. He should consider himself lucky he's only lost his job. That POS should be lined up and shot by a firing squad.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 01, 2018, 04:15:51 PM
Not defending Smith rather disparaging the rush to lynch Urban.  There’s a difference.

Did Urban lie in Chicago to the assembled media?  Sure sounds like it.  Should he be fired for it?  Don’t think so at this point.  Maybe he had reasons. The OSU should ask him.

On a personal note, I would hate to see Urban go with a perfect record over Michigan.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 01, 2018, 04:16:12 PM
 
Covering for tattoos and a little cash vs. covering for beating women. You tell me which one is worse. I'll hang up and listen.
they are both the same
covering for ANYTHING that can damage a program's chance of winning games is the issue.
minor or major isn't the issue - it's the lying to protect the program
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 01, 2018, 04:20:14 PM
What BS?

Head hunting for someone who broke no laws or rules.  

Did the police know?  I guess so since they were called multiple times.  Why wasn’t Smith prosecuted?  Go after the dickhead who let that slide.  Its not the head coaches job to enforce the law.
The legal world of domestic violence is difficult. Is the threshold really prosecution? Does a woman really want to move forward in court in Columbus with the Earle Bruce’s grandson. Based on what fans have said on social media today about her I would guess not. Especially when his $400k a year salary is supporting her and her children’s life.
Moral and legal boundaries are a bit different. I hope most universities moral threshold is more rigid than the legal end, but we have been burned before.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 01, 2018, 04:32:02 PM
Times have changed. 10 years ago - hell, two years ago - this wouldn't get any press.


The key is the lying part. 
This is exactly true. Very interesting times we live in.
What's odd, is why lie? Or why cover for this caliber of coach? Odd situation. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 01, 2018, 04:35:17 PM
What BS?

Head hunting for someone who broke no laws or rules.  

Did the police know?  I guess so since they were called multiple times.  Why wasn’t Smith prosecuted?  Go after the dickhead who let that slide.  Its not the head coaches job to enforce the law.
An interesting question. What does it mean to break rules? The legal system is one way, but it errs on the side of not acting in a great many cases. That’s fine. But if you feel strongly someone did something bad, should you act? Should you have to wait for the legal system to act?
It comes down to judgement. 
(Also, since assistants are basically at-will employees, firing them is really easy)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 04:42:04 PM
https://bleacherreport.com/articles/2789023-ohio-state-must-get-ahead-of-scandal-fire-urban-meyer-immediately
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 01, 2018, 04:59:15 PM
A reason charges aren't filed is when a victim chooses not to cooperate as a witness w police or DA.  This happens quite a bit.  That is reported as the reason he wasn't charged while at Fla.  It doesn't matter who she told or who she texted.   If you don't have a cooperating witness you only have hearsay not proof BARD.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: CatsbyAZ on August 01, 2018, 05:52:31 PM
Been waiting all day to get home from work and read the lengthy thread I expected to come of this. 3 pages already. My two cents: Hit the Fickell button.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 05:56:15 PM
https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/college/columnist/dan-wolken/2018/08/01/ohio-state-must-fire-urban-meyer-if-he-protecting-serial-abuser/883518002/
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 05:58:44 PM
the former ESPN reporter who broke this story, Brett McMurphy was on Doug Gottlieb's radio show just a few hours ago.

LINK: https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/2018-08-01-brett-mcmurphy-updates-his-breaking-story-on-urban-meyer/
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 06:03:05 PM
Front page of the Chicago Tribune now. It's also the lead story on SI.


This thing took off fast today.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 06:06:43 PM
Front page of the Chicago Tribune now. It's also the lead story on SI.


This thing took off fast today.
listen to that interview I posted with McMurphy.
McMurphy says he's sitting on worse stuff that he can't report. Wow.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 06:12:04 PM
I'd say he's in some trouble now.....

Dan Hope‏Verified account @Dan_Hope (https://twitter.com/Dan_Hope) 4m4 minutes ago (https://twitter.com/Dan_Hope/status/1024778569954865153)


Ohio State announces in a statement that Urban Meyer will be on paid administrative leave. Ryan Day will serve as acting head football coach during the investigation.
 4 replies 75 retweets 36 likes



Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: CatsbyAZ on August 01, 2018, 06:13:03 PM
Front page of the Chicago Tribune now. It's also the lead story on SI.


This thing took off fast today.
Plus, with this being a slower time of year in sports news, expect every single host on the sports talk dial to lead every hour with Urban Meyer tomorrow, if they didn’t already start today (like Cowherd).
Meanwhile First Take and any other ESPN editorial program will continue yammering about LeBron Vs MJ for the Seventh Hundred straight day.

edit: Urban Meyer & #OhioState have trended atop Twitter for 5 hours now, and nothing gets notice of Big Media more than holding pole position on Twitter.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 01, 2018, 06:13:23 PM
 School put him on administrative leave. Ryan Day steps in. 

 I’m kind of shocked they acted this fast. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Big Beef Tacosupreme on August 01, 2018, 06:15:58 PM
I suppose it is Ohio State's turn to be in the negative spotlight.  Again.

Probably wouldn't look bad if the head coach just came clean.  But for some reason it looks like he's being untruthful.  Again.

Fortunately, no NCAA violations this time.  I'm thinking things get rocky for a bit and then they settle down again.  It would shock me if Urban gets anything more than a slap on the wrist.

On the other hand, a lot of rumors regarding the reason Zach Smith wasn't fired. 
https://www.facebook.com/TheBrettMcMurphy/posts/2042037522486968 (https://www.facebook.com/TheBrettMcMurphy/posts/2042037522486968)
Quote
“Zach once told me,” said Courtney, “if he ever got fired and this all comes out: ‘I’ll take everyone at Ohio State down with me.’ ”
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 06:16:14 PM
this is what a reporter from 11Warriors- a Buckeye site- that covered OSU for years wrote...


Ramzy Nasrallah‏ @ramzy (https://twitter.com/ramzy)




Of course he knew. He knew he was an alcoholic, he knew his marriage was in shambles and he knew that his mentor's grandson was a terrible football coach and that he was protected because of bloodline. Literally everybody knew. I knew. I wrote around it for six years
7:37 AM - 1 Aug 2018
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Big Beef Tacosupreme on August 01, 2018, 06:21:33 PM
Just to be clear, I am not hating on OSU, I'm just making comparisons between the last witch hunt and this one.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 06:43:01 PM
I suppose it is Ohio State's turn to be in the negative spotlight.  Again.

Probably wouldn't look bad if the head coach just came clean.  But for some reason it looks like he's being untruthful.  Again.

Fortunately, no NCAA violations this time.  I'm thinking things get rocky for a bit and then they settle down again.  It would shock me if Urban gets anything more than a slap on the wrist.

On the other hand, a lot of rumors regarding the reason Zach Smith wasn't fired.  
https://www.facebook.com/TheBrettMcMurphy/posts/2042037522486968 (https://www.facebook.com/TheBrettMcMurphy/posts/2042037522486968)
You sure about that, with Title IX and all?
Nothing like a scandal thread to bring posters out of the woodwork.
Welcome back, all. Can't wait to see what tomorrow brings.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 06:43:37 PM
Just to be clear, I am not hating on OSU, I'm just making comparisons between the last witch hunt and this one.
Leave politics out of this please.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 01, 2018, 07:34:15 PM
WooHoo!!! Maybe we'll get Mike Leach like I originally wanted.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 01, 2018, 07:37:32 PM
this is what a reporter from 11Warriors- a Buckeye site- that covered OSU for years wrote...


Ramzy Nasrallah‏ @ramzy (https://twitter.com/ramzy)




Of course he knew. He knew he was an alcoholic, he knew his marriage was in shambles and he knew that his mentor's grandson was a terrible football coach and that he was protected because of bloodline. Literally everybody knew. I knew. I wrote around it for six years
7:37 AM - 1 Aug 2018
Well Ramzy runs 11 warriors - if that is actually his quote, see ya URBZ we hardly knew ye
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 01, 2018, 07:52:30 PM
School put him on administrative leave. Ryan Day steps in.

 I’m kind of shocked they acted this fast.
This is a better reaction than that of the last round. "I hope Tressel doesn't fire me."
I'm Projecting here: Meyer tried to back (his) POS guy, wife offered to help/assist/encouraged battered spouse. Neither took it to the authorities. Meyer lied about knowing how bad it was, and (his) POS guy just cost him one of the most lucrative jobs anywhere.
Columbus radio has been bashing Meyer all day. I liked the W's he brought the program, but not sure how "anyone" right now can be in his corner.
And at the same time: I'm also having a hard time reconciling the vitriol Courtney Smith is showing towards the Meyers, while I stay compassionate towards her in a devastating situation. Shelley has correspondence, saying "I'm afraid for you." & "How can I help?" but SMith is like you should have forced the situation for me...
It kinda feels (notice I'm using a feel statement here not a factual statement, and as my wife reminds in arguments all the time, a feeling may be wrong but you still have to feel it in order to move on) She is saying I'm not responsible for being it an abusive relationship, you are responsible for not reporting my problems to the authorities. It's just hitting me wrong right now.
I don't know how to reconcile "the lie" that Meyer didn't know. All the evidence I've seen is circumstantial, but come on, the court of public opinion (and common sense) says he had to know. And should have not lied.
But on the other hand, I'm a huge proponent of due process. I truly hope everything can come to light to the right parties, and Due Process can happen before they sac Meyer.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Big Beef Tacosupreme on August 01, 2018, 07:53:28 PM
Leave politics out of this please.
Politics? cause I said witch hunt...OOOOOOHHHHH :smiley_confused1:
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Big Beef Tacosupreme on August 01, 2018, 07:55:43 PM
You sure about that, with Title IX and all?
Nothing like a scandal thread to bring posters out of the woodwork.
Welcome back, all. Can't wait to see what tomorrow brings.
Hah!  That and my slow period every year is from August to October.  Hard to keep up before and after that.  :(
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 01, 2018, 08:06:17 PM
This is a better reaction than that of the last round. "I hope Tressel doesn't fire me."
Exactly,like you I wasn't that enamored with UFM.But when Tressell tried to assuage the rancor with "I'm suspending myself 2 weeks - then 4 weeks then 7 weeks.Like the population is a gaggle of ebola chimps believing that steaming pile.Specially for covering up something so trivial
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 09:39:10 PM
https://twitter.com/FauxPelini/status/1024825153564430336?s=19
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: utee94 on August 01, 2018, 09:40:54 PM
BBTZ is back, with his S instead of Z?  Now that is some major news, on an otherwise slow news day! :)

Like others I just hate hearing stories like this.  First and foremost I hate that a woman was abused for years.  No matter what else happens, that is the story that needs to be understood, remembered, and acted upon.

I have no idea what else went on, I suppose time will tell, but man, I just hope and pray for a time when we can get past where beating up on less powerful people is commonplace.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 09:47:02 PM
BBTZ is back, with his S instead of Z?  Now that is some major news, on an otherwise slow news day! :)

Like others I just hate hearing stories like this.  First and foremost I hate that a woman was abused for years.  No matter what else happens, that is the story that needs to be understood, remembered, and acted upon.

I have no idea what else went on, I suppose time will tell, but man, I just hope and pray for a time when we can get past where beating up on less powerful people is commonplace.

Few can put that above the sports impact.  Way of life
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 10:34:48 PM
TMZ digging into this saga:

http://www.tmz.com/2018/08/01/urban-meyer-placed-on-administrative-leave-amid-domestic-violence-scandal/

Cleveland Plain Dealer reporting that 9 police reports were filed by the ex-wife over the last 6 years. Highly doubt Urban knew about zero of those.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 01, 2018, 10:40:10 PM
Politics? cause I said witch hunt...OOOOOOHHHHH :smiley_confused1:
Hah!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 01, 2018, 10:51:04 PM
Well Ramzy runs 11 warriors - if that is actually his quote, see ya URBZ we hardly knew ye
it's from his twitter. check it out.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 01, 2018, 10:54:18 PM
Reese Davis is reporting the Administrative Leave isn't to investigate Myer's knowledge of the abuse or not, but to finalize his termination.

I just want Due Process! Not a court of public opinion conviction.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 11:00:04 PM
Reese Davis is reporting the Administrative Leave isn't to investigate Myer's knowledge of the abuse or not, but to finalize his termination.

I just want Due Process! Not a court of public opinion conviction.
Well no, he said he has no info to that effect, but that is his suspicion.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 01, 2018, 11:02:03 PM
I don't think the #metoo movement's desire is for the guy who knew about the guy beating up his wife to lose his job, but for the abuser to be imprisoned for what he did.



I listened to the ESPN college football podcast today, and came away feeling gross.  Not by anything that Meyer did, but by what whores ESPN (and all 'news' outlets) and what whores we are to the daily, ongoing news cycle.  Smith should be the one held over a fire right now.  He committed the crimes.  He's the garbage human being.  But how things are, we find the bad apple and scan the entire tree, ravenously searching for the most important apple on it, then attacking it instead of the bad apple.




Meyer should lose his job because he knew something EVERYONE involved knew?  Why?  Because he lied?  Who here hasn't lied twice today?  This is stupid and lets the garbage human being abuser piece of shit become the backseat story...which is wrong.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 01, 2018, 11:02:53 PM
Well no, he said he has no info to that effect, but that is his suspicion.
This blurred line between journalistic reporting and talking-head, tie-wearing "what if" garbage is a societal problem.



People aren't smart enough to tell when they're listening to a journalist or a commentator, period.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Kris61 on August 01, 2018, 11:16:07 PM
I don't think the #metoo movement's desire is for the guy who knew about the guy beating up his wife to lose his job, but for the abuser to be imprisoned for what he did.



I listened to the ESPN college football podcast today, and came away feeling gross.  Not by anything that Meyer did, but by what whores ESPN (and all 'news' outlets) and what whores we are to the daily, ongoing news cycle.  Smith should be the one held over a fire right now.  He committed the crimes.  He's the garbage human being.  But how things are, we find the bad apple and scan the entire tree, ravenously searching for the most important apple on it, then attacking it instead of the bad apple.




Meyer should lose his job because he knew something EVERYONE involved knew?  Why?  Because he lied?  Who here hasn't lied twice today?  This is stupid and lets the garbage human being abuser piece of shit become the backseat story...which is wrong.
Honestly, I’m pretty much with you on this.  This is the downside of being rich and famous.  If a manager at Denny’s handles the exact same situation the exact same way with one of his cashiers and his boss finds out it’s not even an issue.  It’s “Eh, it’s really none of our business anyway.”
But Meyer isn’t the manager at a Denny’s.  He’s the very public face of the multi-million dollar corporation that is Ohio St football and now the world knows he lied about it.  And when we find out a public figure lied we are supposed to act shocked and dismayed.
If I were Ohio St I’d roll Meyer out and just let him get barbecued at a press conference for about an hour.  Admit he lied.  He wasn’t sure what to do.  It was a difficult situation.  Suspend him a game or two and then reinstate him.
Like someone else said, eventually the news cycle would shift, Ohio St would resume winning games, and people would just sort of move on.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 01, 2018, 11:16:48 PM
From another poster "Somewhere Jim Harbaugh is out there furiously jerking it "
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 01, 2018, 11:30:53 PM
This blurred line between journalistic reporting and talking-head, tie-wearing "what if" garbage is a societal problem.



People aren't smart enough to tell when they're listening to a journalist or a commentator, period.  
Most "news" is talking head opinions.  I'm not defending him, I was just scaling back any discussion that his words were an actual report
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 02, 2018, 12:01:06 AM
It's worse with news networks though.  They pretend to be journalists until they're called out on it, then claim "I'm just a commentator".....it's ugly BS.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 12:08:43 AM
Few can put that above the sports impact.  Way of life

No doubt. And then even of those who do act like they put it above sports impact, a decent fraction is just lip service. Saying the right things to make it seem like one's priorities are straight. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 12:22:49 AM
This blurred line between journalistic reporting and talking-head, tie-wearing "what if" garbage is a societal problem.



People aren't smart enough to tell when they're listening to a journalist or a commentator, period.  
When it comes to this topic, I toss two opposite ideas in my head. 

Either:
(1) the media is us - that if one were able to add up and average every NPR, Nat. Enquirer rag, Fox/CNN editorial, Vogue mag, Tumblr post, podcast, radio station, house flipping reality TV and all the others that it would be precisely equal to the average of modern humanity in terms of good/bad, decency/foulness, simplicity/nuance, oafishness/sophistication (...) and that if you agree that the media complex is amidst a long nosedive of "lowering the bar," that it isn't the media heads but civilization itself that is primarily to blame. And if we become healthier, so will our media.
OR
(2) Civilization is qualitatively no better/worse than it has ever been (since, e.g., the advent of television), yet the founding forces of big media like television began with high ideals that were mismatched with modern society and the long nosedive of "lowering the bar" is just an inevitable outcome of the sum-of-all-media changing to best reflect its representatives.
In either case, I believe that "we common people" are more primarily to blame than the "media execs." Both options are consistent with that. They just differ on the mechanism to-date and future outlook. I find option #2 much more pessimistic (as it implies our crappiness is innate and - with some qualifiers about 100years being a relatively short experiment on the scale of civilization - maybe we can't as a cumulative unit become any better, so our nosediving media is *necessarily* here to stay).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 12:25:37 AM
Some memes are good:
Ad(https://abs-0.twimg.com/emoji/v2/svg/274c.svg)inistrative leave
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 02, 2018, 12:42:23 AM
When it comes to this topic, I toss two opposite ideas in my head.

Either:
(1) the media is us - that if one were able to add up and average every NPR, Nat. Enquirer rag, Fox/CNN editorial, Vogue mag, Tumblr post, podcast, radio station, house flipping reality TV and all the others that it would be precisely equal to the average of modern humanity in terms of good/bad, decency/foulness, simplicity/nuance, oafishness/sophistication (...) and that if you agree that the media complex is amidst a long nosedive of "lowering the bar," that it isn't the media heads but civilization itself that is primarily to blame. And if we become healthier, so will our media.
OR
(2) Civilization is qualitatively no better/worse than it has ever been (since, e.g., the advent of television), yet the founding forces of big media like television began with high ideals that were mismatched with modern society and the long nosedive of "lowering the bar" is just an inevitable outcome of the sum-of-all-media changing to best reflect its representatives.
In either case, I believe that "we common people" are more primarily to blame than the "media execs." Both options are consistent with that. They just differ on the mechanism to-date and future outlook. I find option #2 much more pessimistic (as it implies our crappiness is innate and - with some qualifiers about 100years being a relatively short experiment on the scale of civilization - maybe we can't as a cumulative unit become any better, so our nosediving media is *necessarily* here to stay).
Well said.....
I don't think it's an either/or though....what I mean to say is there is no one unified "we" - there are the heads of the media/advertisers/etc and there's the rest of us (consumers, whatever).  You identified these two groups, but I don't think they can be lumped together in any way.  In no alternate universe are they-us or we-them.  
Of your opposites, if it were just us, "the rest of us" populating it all, it'd be #1.  But the fact that there are those titans of industry, who attained their position by preying on the rest of us - who must prey on us, will always do what they do to extract another penny from the lowest common denominator of our faults.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 02, 2018, 12:44:53 AM
Just consider the sheer volume of life-time we surrender to advertisers - commercials, youtube ads, looking at billboards, etc.....the sum of all of that - we're colossal whores to them.  Added  up, weeks or months of our lives just handed over to them.  Why?  How did we get here?!?




**this is going off-topic, sorry
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: DevilFroggy on August 02, 2018, 01:25:16 AM
So how long until Urban finds himself on Nick Saban's staff?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 02, 2018, 05:33:09 AM
Any of OSU’s 15 solid 2019 commits softening?  

Logic dictates Urban’s entire staff be swept at the end of the season since they were in on the dirty secret.   Everyone should be highly motivated in camp.

The timing of this mess could not be worse from the Buckeyes point of view.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 02, 2018, 07:01:46 AM
Any of OSU’s 15 solid 2019 commits softening?  

Logic dictates Urban’s entire staff be swept at the end of the season since they were in on the dirty secret.   Everyone should be highly motivated in camp.

The timing of this mess could not be worse from the Buckeyes point of view.
Any of them? Hopefully the one he flipped from UW flips back.
As for his staff, I think it's wiped clean of anyone who was there besides Meyer, from 2015. Buckeye fans can correct that, but I'm pretty sure I'm right.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 07:34:34 AM
So how long until Urban finds himself on Nick Saban's staff?
HA!Nice, no doubt St.Nick will offer him just to be smug,pretty sure UFM doesn't need the coin
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 07:41:17 AM
As for his staff, I think it's wiped clean of anyone who was there besides Meyer, from 2015. Buckeye fans can correct that, but I'm pretty sure I'm right.
IMO not until 2019,anyone taking the reigns right now will need all the help they can get.And it'll be only a temporary apptmnt.Can't just overhaul everything with no connection to the present players.There could be a mass exodus otherwise.Which is fine if you want to wreck the program for a few years
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 02, 2018, 08:12:44 AM
Day being named interim head coach over the more experienced Schiano and Wilson is interesting.  I wonder if they’ve started packing their baggage.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 08:13:13 AM
 One of the more interesting aspects of this is how population in general reacts. It appears as if the 2015 incident was completely denied by Zack Smith and the police investigation agreed with him. 
 In other words it’s a he said she said and whether anything even happened at all, yet everyone is so quick to assume that he did these things he’s being accused of. 

 I have actually been the witness in court to a similar situation where she abused him but tried to have him prosecuted for abusing her. 

The  Faux out rage of Urban’ detractors is humorous and predictable
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 02, 2018, 08:28:37 AM
IMO not until 2019,anyone taking the reigns right now will need all the help they can get.And it'll be only a temporary apptmnt.Can't just overhaul everything with no connection to the present players.There could be a mass exodus otherwise.Which is fine if you want to wreck the program for a few years
No, what I meant is that I don't think there is anyone left on the staff now that was there in 2015. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 08:33:51 AM
Larry Johnson
No, what I meant is that I don't think there is anyone left on the staff now that was there in 2015.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 08:41:25 AM
One of the more interesting aspects of this is how population in general reacts. It appears as if the 2015 incident was completely denied by Zack Smith and the police investigation agreed with him.
 In other words it’s a he said she said and whether anything even happened at all, yet everyone is so quick to assume that he did these things he’s being accused of.

 I have actually been the witness in court to a similar situation where she abused him but tried to have him prosecuted for abusing her.

The  Faux out rage of Urban’ detractors is humorous and predictable
How do you respond to the detail that everything in McMurphy's article(s) has been documented? (Arrests, charges, photos, texts with Shelley Meyer, etc.) That it doesn't include any anonymous sources? That, unless the documents are questioned, the story can stand alone without hand waving about "whatever else is out there?"
That's the aspect that makes it most credible.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 08:46:08 AM
When did Smith's wife actually file charges?I mean for real,because unless Urban witnessed the abuse,what legally was he obligated to do?We know morally what the obligation is.But was Smith ex also reluctant to get him fired.Just asking because I'm not spending any time investigating.IMO Meyer and Gene Smith will both be shown the door 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 02, 2018, 08:48:53 AM
Any of OSU’s 15 solid 2019 commits softening?  

Logic dictates Urban’s entire staff be swept at the end of the season since they were in on the dirty secret.   Everyone should be highly motivated in camp.

The timing of this mess could not be worse from the Buckeyes point of view.
Word that Dwan Mathis reached out to MSU about flipping back, and was told no.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 02, 2018, 08:49:15 AM
https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/status/1024886218197278720?s=19
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 02, 2018, 08:53:43 AM
One of the more interesting aspects of this is how population in general reacts. It appears as if the 2015 incident was completely denied by Zack Smith and the police investigation agreed with him.
 In other words it’s a he said she said and whether anything even happened at all, yet everyone is so quick to assume that he did these things he’s being accused of.

I have actually been the witness in court to a similar situation where she abused him but tried to have him prosecuted for abusing her.

The  Faux out rage of Urban’ detractors is humorous and predictable
Am I to read into this that you are a person working in the legal profession? (sorry if that's a tad personal, but I wanted to shape a response and that context would matter)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 02, 2018, 08:53:50 AM
I hope Urban gets a fair shake.  Don’t know what the facts are.  Do know universities are densly populated with PC cliff divers.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 02, 2018, 08:57:33 AM
When did Smith's wife actually file charges?I mean for real,because unless Urban witnessed the abuse,what legally was he obligated to do?We know morally what the obligation is.But was Smith ex also reluctant to get him fired.Just asking because I'm not spending any time investigating.IMO Meyer and Gene Smith will both be shown the door
The DV situations can be tricky. A friend works in an ER and will talk to girls who say "Yes he busted up my face, but I can't leave him."
I saw a case where the victim was publicly saying "It's not how it looks." And the cops had a house that had been broken into by a drunk ex-lover and pressed some kinds of charges. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 09:03:35 AM
I hope Urban gets a fair shake.  Don’t know what the facts are.  Do know universities are densly populated with PC cliff divers.
Ya me too 430 but if he knew about this for quite some time then sayonara.At one time or another he had to report up to Gene Smith if he knew.Specially after what happened at other schools,so either ignorant or negligent neither is a virtue
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 09:03:45 AM
How do you respond to the detail that everything in McMurphy's article(s) has been documented? (Arrests, charges, photos, texts with Shelley Meyer, etc.) That it doesn't include any anonymous sources? That, unless the documents are questioned, the story can stand alone without hand waving about "whatever else is out there?"
That's the aspect that makes it most credible.
 There is no dispute about the arrest in 2009.  
The question at hand is 2015.  There was no arrest.  Shelley Meyer encouraged her to press charges and she wouldn’t.  
The police investigated and also did not press 
You have heard only one side- the side of someone who is going public only after her income source has dried up. 
I would think you would like to hear what Zach Smith has to say and what Meyer had to say. 
If you watch Urbans comments specifically he says “when we looked into 2015 there was nothing there”. 
He also mentions “ what was reported is not what happened “. 
I get the feeling there is a he said- she said aspect to this- so in that case what do you do?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 02, 2018, 09:04:34 AM
I hope Urban gets a fair shake.  Don’t know what the facts are.  Do know universities are densly populated with PC cliff divers.
Chances are very high, we will never fully know this. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 09:08:02 AM
Am I to read into this that you are a person working in the legal profession? (sorry if that's a tad personal, but I wanted to shape a response and that context would matter)
No.  As a personal witness.   The female pressed charges for him hitting her.  
I had witnessed the exact opposite 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 02, 2018, 09:13:48 AM
Day being named interim head coach over the more experienced Schiano and Wilson is interesting.  I wonder if they’ve started packing their baggage.
I also thought that was interesting.  I think it indicates that they are at least thinking about the possibility that this "Acting Head Coach" thing will become "Interim Head Coach" and they wanted to avoid the baggage of Schiano and Wilson.  If they were confident that it was just a few weeks then it would be logical to appoint one of those two who have run programs in the past.  
That looks bad for Urban.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 02, 2018, 09:14:16 AM
My most memorable client I ever defended. He called the cops.  Why? His wife was whacking him with a rake and her mother was throwing cans of soup at him.  My guy has a witness who tells me quote "he took it like a champ ". What do the police do when they show up? Arrest my client.  MKE PD policy. He didn't complete some household tasks he was supposed to do. She was none too pleased about it.

This case dragged out until we finally got the wife to show up and tell the Court she was doing the beating.  They hugged each other in the courtroom .  My guy had priors but never for DV.

As said before, DV cases can be really difficult to handle for anybody. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 02, 2018, 09:14:57 AM
I hope Urban gets a fair shake.  Don’t know what the facts are.  Do know universities are densly populated with PC cliff divers.
This could be a major issue in this situation.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 02, 2018, 09:19:06 AM
I've been thinking about this for a while and I'm more than a little perplexed.  

First, as someone who has hire/fire responsibility I never encountered or considered a situation like this but what is my responsibility if one of my employees is allegedly beating his wife?  

Second, lying about knowledge is different.  That seems pretty clear but I don't see it as a coverup.  The police were involved in at least one instance and Urban's wife (among others) encouraged the victim to press charges.  I would view this a lot differently if Urban's wife had texted the victim and said something to the effect of "Oh please don't report this, we have a NC to win".  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 09:27:13 AM
There is no dispute about the arrest in 2009.  
The question at hand is 2015.  There was no arrest.  Shelley Meyer encouraged her to press charges and she wouldn’t.  
The police investigated and also did not press
You have heard only one side- the side of someone who is going public only after her income source has dried up.
I would think you would like to hear what Zach Smith has to say and what Meyer had to say.
If you watch Urbans comments specifically he says “when we looked into 2015 there was nothing there”.
He also mentions “ what was reported is not what happened “.
I get the feeling there is a he said- she said aspect to this- so in that case what do you do?
I think that's the careful way to approach this and can support it since we may never know every detail for sure. But it does come with some booby traps.
-That 2009 happened (even without all the house calls in the 2010s) does forever link Smith to a certain kind of behavior. With Urban admitting he knew about that "first" example.
-That Shelley texted what she did (with the serious tone she seems to have) further ramps the credibility and brings (alleged) repeat offenses (that people other than just Courtney believed) into the OSU community and Meyer household.
Which comes awfully close to an airtight pattern of behavior (Smith) argument. With credible support for the idea that the pattern was willfully ignored (i.e., he wasn't fired before this went public).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 02, 2018, 09:45:39 AM
smells like Urban is gone

right or wrong
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 09:54:45 AM
I think that's the careful way to approach this and can support it since we may never know every detail for sure. But it does come with some booby traps.
-That 2009 happened (even without all the house calls in the 2010s) does forever link Smith to a certain kind of behavior. With Urban admitting he knew about that "first" example.
-That Shelley texted what she did (with the serious tone she seems to have) further ramps the credibility and brings (alleged) repeat offenses (that people other than just Courtney believed) into the OSU community and Meyer household.
Which comes awfully close to an airtight pattern of behavior (Smith) argument. With credible support for the idea that the pattern was willfully ignored.
 So what if Meyer approached Zack Smith about the alleged 2015 incident and Zach Smith not only disputed it but had counterclaims. Then Meyer who says they checked with the authorities and the authorities position was there’s no evidence to back Smith‘s wife’s claims. Then what do you do? And lastly when all this came to light Smith was simply dropping off the child at the ex-wife‘s house which granted he was not supposed to do but where is the big crime in that 
 We are talking about destroying the career of one of college football’s greatest coaches based on hearsay of something that may not even have happened and he had nothing directly to do with it even if it did happen. 
You have to admit our current culture in this country is at least 75% of the momentum behind this whole story
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 10:01:53 AM
Even if Smith disputed it, the OSU admin clearly thinks that 2009+2015 was enough to fire Smith.
You can argue that Shelley Meyer was just wrong. And that all those ugly photos of Courtney were photoshopped or staged. But - although technically possible - those things seem unlikely.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 10:05:03 AM
A very separate thought: even before any of this, who thought Zach Smith was a well adjusted, good guy who had a talent for coaching and definitely deserved to keep his job?
Although the DV was his ultimate undoing, he probably deserved to be canned long before -- for his online persona and, as Ramzy argues, inability to coach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 02, 2018, 11:07:02 AM
I've been thinking about this for a while and I'm more than a little perplexed.  

First, as someone who has hire/fire responsibility I never encountered or considered a situation like this but what is my responsibility if one of my employees is allegedly beating his wife?  
I've thought about this a lot in the last 24 hours as well. I suppose if it came up, I would go directly to legal counsel and ensure it was well documented in writing. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 02, 2018, 11:07:29 AM
 And lastly when all this came to light Smith was simply dropping off the child at the ex-wife‘s house which granted he was not supposed to do but where is the big crime in that
that's the admission.  This is not a big crime on it's own.  So, obviously there have been much larger things leading up to this minor incident.
Meyer firing Smith for this minor incident shows that NOW Meyer is aware (came ti light) of the past transgressions or at least her side of the story
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 11:09:24 AM
A very separate thought: even before any of this, who thought Zach Smith was a well adjusted, good guy who had a talent for coaching and definitely deserved to keep his job?
Although the DV was his ultimate undoing, he probably deserved to be canned long before -- for his online persona and, as Ramzy argues, inability to coach.
Zach Smith is a POS human garbage and spectacularly he's an even more garbage football coach than he is human being.
Kinda blows my mind that Urban is probably going to lose his job by being and staying loyal to that worthless idiot. Should've never been hired in the first place. Should've fired him long ago. Stayed loyal to him out of the love he had for the kids grandfather and it's going to cost him his job.
Should be a big lesson to everyone on nepotism. Only hire people that are upstanding and qualified to do the job. Don't hire them just because they are family or like family.
Zach Smith had zero business ever being a WR coach at a school like Ohio State. It's not a coincidence that every WR OSU produces needs major work once they hit the NFL. Devin Smith should've been a 1st round pick with that talent, he came to the Jets not knowing how to run routes and was never able to see the field because of it and his NFL career is already over. Sean Payton had to personally work with Michael Thomas as a rookie and teach him route concepts. How many TD passes did OSU's WR's drop last year that hit them point blank right in the hands? Zach Smith was straight GARBAGE. And I've been saying that about him for years. Absolutely blows my mind that clown is about to bring down one of the greats in Urban.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 11:11:16 AM
I've thought about this a lot in the last 24 hours as well. I suppose if it came up, I would go directly to legal counsel and ensure it was well documented in writing. 
Yes. Probably that as a minimum. I probably would not be held accountable if I didn't though. I'd just be upset with myself.
Not everyone has a contractual obligation (and, presumably, training) to report, however.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 11:13:32 AM
Even if Smith disputed it, the OSU admin clearly thinks that 2009+2015 was enough to fire Smith.
You can argue that Shelley Meyer was just wrong. And that all those ugly photos of Courtney were photoshopped or staged. But - although technically possible - those things seem unlikely.
Agreed and that’s why he was fired. Why are we assuming that Meyer did not inform his superiors? Who has ever said that? And where exactly is this “lie”? If you listen carefully to what he said at the big 10 media days he basically clears the air on 2009 and says that in 2015 the police report or whatever information he sought to find the truth indicated that there was nothing there. 
Let me be clear about this: if he was truly aware of physical abuse that was ongoing ( in other words validated or at least highly likely given that her refusal to press charges makes many of her claims questionable ) and did nothing as far as informing his superiors and just try to hope it was swept under the rug, he needs to be terminated for that. But right now all I hear are a lot of assumptions about that based on one person‘s side of the story as reported by one media person  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 02, 2018, 11:20:13 AM
We're all "in it" when it comes to our own lives.  Meyer (and all coaches) should've learned from Paterno, but how many actually did.  It's common sense to only hire the best guy for the job, but how often does that actualy occur???  

He's always been nice to me....
He's related to someone I respect....
He's my best friend.....


None of that should matter 1%, but so many of everyone holds personal, anectotal 'evidence' over prudent, plain truths.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 11:22:28 AM
HB: That's fair. Maybe Meyer did report it. I'm still surprised by the timing of the firing, then, though. Since the recent report probably didn't teach Meyer (or OSU, if he reported) anything he/they didn't already know.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 02, 2018, 11:24:51 AM

Let me be clear about this: if he was truly aware of physical abuse that was ongoing ( in other words validated or at least highly likely given that her refusal to press charges makes many of her claims questionable ) and did nothing as far as informing his superiors and just try to hope it was swept under the rug, he needs to be terminated for that. 
I disagree.  It's awful, but I disagree.
Meyer's job is to look out for his players and his family.  His coaching assistant's wives aren't really his business.  There's a reason they specify "domestic" violence - that's in soemoone else's home.  
It's not a comfortable idea, but I feel it's accurate.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 02, 2018, 11:29:58 AM
Agreed and that’s why he was fired. Why are we assuming that Meyer did not inform his superiors? Who has ever said that? And where exactly is this “lie”? If you listen carefully to what he said at the big 10 media days he basically clears the air on 2009 and says that in 2015 the police report or whatever information he sought to find the truth indicated that there was nothing there.  
That's where this gets mushy.
If you assume he did in fact report this to superiors, he contradicted that last week at media days.
I have no doubt Smith did what he did to his wife. His text message to her confirms this.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 02, 2018, 11:35:24 AM
Yeah I think we are finding that out across all mediums.  I'm not talking about the Harvey Weinstein stuff, but people having old Tweets dragged out.  I think the days of coaches being able to put blinders on while the police "handle" stuff is over.  Hell, I remember the drug officer in 1995 telling a room full of 5th graders that the standing orders for UM/Ann Arbor police officers, when he was on the beat in the 70s and 80s was that if he picked up a UM football player, you absolutely did not book him, or take him to jail.  You took him straight to Bo's house, and he handled it.  He didn't tell it in a "can you believe this?" but in a "this is funny" kind of way, and not to people at a private dinner party, but to a room full of public school children.

I think a lot of these coaches grew up in that mentality.
http://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/24259780/urban-meyer-ohio-state-buckeyes-coaching-scandal
This article might be a tad harsh, but this is what I was getting at.  This is why Izzo seems perplexed about why he's getting questioned about his hadnling of situations where, either a.) the police deemed there wasn't enough to pursue; or b.) the coaching staff was never notified.  This is simply how it's been for decades.  The major sports programs were untouchable.  As long as the i's were dotted and the t's were crossed it was fine.  That's not the case anymore, and it's for the better, and these coaches are way too slow to adjust.  Maybe they are too ingrained in the way it's always been.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 12:20:54 PM
That's where this gets mushy.
If you assume he did in fact report this to superiors, he contradicted that last week at media days.
I have no doubt Smith did what he did to his wife. His text message to her confirms this.
Well you raised a good point earlier about - if this is all true, then all of the coaches knew. 
What’s good for the goose—. The other coaches that were there need to be accountable.   Vrabel- Coombs- Warriner and so on.   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 12:24:40 PM
Let me be clear about this: if he was truly aware of physical abuse that was ongoing ( in other words validated or at least highly likely given that her refusal to press charges makes many of her claims questionable ) and did nothing as far as informing his superiors and just try to hope it was swept under the rug, he needs to be terminated for that. But right now all I hear are a lot of assumptions about that based on one person‘s side of the story as reported by one media person  
Agreed,thanx for saving me time/effort.Find it hard to believe he did not report up,if guilty let him swing like Tress.Really starting to think Gene Smith doesn't survive this or he shouldn't
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 12:27:15 PM
I disagree.  It's awful, but I disagree.
Meyer's job is to look out for his players and his family.  His coaching assistant's wives aren't really his business.  There's a reason they specify "domestic" violence - that's in soemoone else's home.  
It's not a comfortable idea, but I feel it's accurate.
Moral contractual obligations as a State Emolyee
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 02, 2018, 12:33:03 PM
quick note before i post this, the guy reporting this (o'keefe/project veritas) is as shady as they come, so take it with a health dash of salt, but it is being reported along with the meyer stuff, so figured i'd just get it all out there now.

they are reporting/posting videos of florida players (under the meyer staff) discussing 'abuse' to those players. supposedly with more to come that are more condemning.

imo, the videos so far that i've seen are pretty weak, but they are there. also, as noted above, o'keefe has been found to edit videos creatively to get what he wants, so again, take with grain of salt.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 02, 2018, 12:38:27 PM
 The other coaches that were there need to be accountable.   Vrabel- Coombs- Warriner and so on.  
perhaps why the particular coach was named interim ?  He was someone that did not know?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 12:56:14 PM
quick note before i post this, the guy reporting this (o'keefe/project veritas) is as shady as they come, so take it with a health dash of salt, but it is being reported along with the meyer stuff, so figured i'd just get it all out there now.

they are reporting/posting videos of florida players (under the meyer staff) discussing 'abuse' to those players. supposedly with more to come that are more condemning.

imo, the videos so far that i've seen are pretty weak, but they are there. also, as noted above, o'keefe has been found to edit videos creatively to get what he wants, so again, take with grain of salt.
Yeah those sources have a pretty stupid journalistic history. Deserves zero trust.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 01:00:05 PM
perhaps why the particular coach was named interim ?  He was someone that did not know?
Right away, appointing Day seemed pretty thoughtful and proactive. Made it seem another increment more likely that an interim succession plan was at least on the table.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 02, 2018, 01:06:05 PM
I have actually been the witness in court to a similar situation where she abused him but tried to have him prosecuted for abusing her.
When did Smith's wife actually file charges?I mean for real,because unless Urban witnessed the abuse,what legally was he obligated to do?We know morally what the obligation is.But was Smith ex also reluctant to get him fired.Just asking because I'm not spending any time investigating.IMO Meyer and Gene Smith will both be shown the door
Honestbuckeye: Likewise I have a personal friend with a crazy ex-wife that injured herself, called the cops, got him arrested. Luckily for him it got laughed out of court by the judge who realized she was a nutcase. That said, there is a long-standing pattern here, not a one-time incident. Pretty sure that if she had been calling the cops on him over and over with no reason, he'd have walked away instead of her divorcing him. The optics don't look like a he-said / she-said.
MrNubbz: Again, with them working for the same company and Title IX involved, Urban may have had a duty to do more. He might have had a duty not necessarily to fire Smith, but to alert HR of the issue and turn the matter over to them to handle. And it appears that as an OSU employee, Shelley may have had the same duty. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hoss on August 02, 2018, 01:07:51 PM
It was pointed out to me that Day hasn't been around long enough to be involved in any of the backsplash from the allegations either. He can be a clean break for the AD. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 01:09:06 PM
Moral contractual obligations as a State Emolyee
this.
He's the highest paid state employee in Ohio. He's also responsible for shaping 18-22 year old men. These aren't professionals where he could fall back on the excuse that they are just there to be paid and do a job, that he doesn't need to be a role model and example for them. He's a college coach. That is part of his job like or not. Urban has a moral obligation not to hire and keep around wife beaters. The buck stops with him. He is the CEO. He is responsible for that program and he is responsible for the people that he HIRES to WORK FOR HIM. I keep hearing about people talking about other coaches. Other coaches didn't hire and keep Zach Smith around for almost a decade. Urban did. Other coaches can say whatever they want to Urban, hey maybe this guy should be out of here- but it's not up to them to fire anyone. Only Urban or someone above him like the AD/President can make that call.
He absolutely knew. There is no way in hell Shelley Meyer didn't tell him. They've been married for 30 years. Zach Smith wasn't just a coach either. He was also the grandson of his mentor/2nd father. He's known Zach Smith for most of Zach Smith's life. Urban says he and his wife tried to help out in the 2009 incident involving Smith and his ex-wife. Urban wasn't just his employer. He was a close family friend and he knew there was a history of domestic violence with this guy dating back to 2009.
There really was no excuse for him keeping that despicable excuse of a human being Zach Smith around. Why did Urban only fire him only a week ago? Oh maybe bc the piece of shit finally got popped and it slipped out in the media? I'd bet my life he'd still be the WR coach had it not gone public. The Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the police were called by that woman NINE times in the last 6 years. Nine times. You think Columbus PD doesn't have Urban's #? You really think he doesn't have connections there? The ex-wife has records of texts and pics she sent Shelley Meyer. Shelley asked her if she had a restraining order and to get one because Zach scares her. You have to suspend all belief to think for one second Shelley never shared pics or told Urban about any of it.
And don't give me this horseshit that oh charges were never filed, charges were never filed he was never convicted. Bullshit. Unfortunately women who suffer abuse for years and never file charges or even call the police after their husbands beat them. They take the abuse hoping things will get better. It's fucked up and it's sad. The only way things will ever change is if people like Zach Smith are ostracized, ridiculed, and cast aside and have their entire worlds destroyed and the people who ENABLE THEM like Urban Meyer did are held accountable.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 01:23:00 PM
this.
He's the highest paid state employee in Ohio. He's also responsible for shaping 18-22 year old men. These aren't professionals where he could fall back on the excuse that they are just there to be paid and do a job, that he doesn't need to be a role model and example for them. He's a college coach. That is part of his job like or not. Urban has a moral obligation not to hire and keep around wife beaters. The buck stops with him. He is the CEO. He is responsible for that program and he is responsible for the people that he HIRES to WORK FOR HIM. I keep hearing about people talking about other coaches. Other coaches didn't hire and keep Zach Smith around for almost a decade. Urban did. Other coaches can say whatever they want to Urban, hey maybe this guy should be out of here- but it's not up to them to fire anyone. Only Urban or someone above him like the AD/President can make that call.
He absolutely knew. There is no way in hell Shelley Meyer didn't tell him. They've been married for 30 years. Zach Smith wasn't just a coach either. He was also the grandson of his mentor/2nd father. He's known Zach Smith for most of Zach Smith's life. Urban says he and his wife tried to help out in the 2009 incident involving Smith and his ex-wife. Urban wasn't just his employer. He was a close family friend and he knew there was a history of domestic violence with this guy dating back to 2009.
There really was no excuse for him keeping that despicable excuse of a human being Zach Smith around. Why did Urban only fire him only a week ago? Oh maybe bc the piece of shit finally got popped and it slipped out in the media? I'd bet my life he'd still be the WR coach had it not gone public. The Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that the police were called by that woman NINE times in the last 6 years. Nine times. You think Columbus PD doesn't have Urban's #? You really think he doesn't have connections there? The ex-wife has records of texts and pics she sent Shelley Meyer. Shelley asked her if she had a restraining order and to get one because Zach scares her. You have to suspend all belief to think for one second Shelley never shared pics or told Urban about any of it.
And don't give me this horseshit that oh charges were never filed, charges were never filed he was never convicted. Bullshit. Unfortunately women who suffer abuse for years and never file charges or even call the police after their husbands beat them. They take the abuse hoping things will get better. It's fucked up and it's sad. The only way things will ever change is if people like Zach Smith are ostracized, ridiculed, and cast aside and have their entire worlds destroyed and the people who ENABLE THEM like Urban Meyer did are held accountable.
Spoken like a true fan of a team that can’t beat the guy.   Judge, jury and hangman. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 02, 2018, 01:23:54 PM
First, as someone who has hire/fire responsibility I never encountered or considered a situation like this but what is my responsibility if one of my employees is allegedly beating his wife?  
I've thought about this a lot in the last 24 hours as well. I suppose if it came up, I would go directly to legal counsel and ensure it was well documented in writing.
Yes. Probably that as a minimum. I probably would not be held accountable if I didn't though. I'd just be upset with myself.
Not everyone has a contractual obligation (and, presumably, training) to report, however.
I've had training on this from my employer, as I used to have some management responsibility. 
If you have an employee that is being abused, even if by a non-employee, you go to HR. The reason for this is that abuse off-site can turn into abuse on-premises. The thing about workplaces is that it's a place where an abuser knows someone is going to be for certain hours of every day, knows when they generally arrive/leave, etc. So even if someone who is being abused or fears abuse is trying to keep the abuser out of their life or hide, the workplace is the place they're least capable of hiding.
Going the opposite way, if the employee was the abuser, I'd say there's still a duty to report to HR. The above rationale is one thing--abuse off-site can provoke issues or retaliation on-site. But also because having the knowledge and doing nothing about it can be a PR nightmare. What happens, for example, if the abuser kills the victim, and then it comes out in the media that I as his manager knew about domestic violence issues and didn't report them to HR? Yeah, I'd be sent packing to protect the company. 
Nobody wants to be the bad guy in this situation. It's thorny and basically every decision you make can be wrong if events go against you. Which is why the best idea is to just move it up the chain to HR and let them deal with it. It's their job. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 01:25:19 PM
Spoken like a true fan of a team that can’t beat the guy.   Judge, jury and hangman.
No. Spoken like a true person who has ZERO tolerance for women beating pieces of shit like Zach Smith.
What you just wrote is spoken like a true fan who puts winning above morality.
There is ZERO chance that Urban didn't know this piece of human shit was beating on his wife. And he continued to give him cover and employ him.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 01:28:03 PM
"If you lie, you can never coach again."

Hmmm. Wonder what self-righteous sanctimonious weasel said that? I wonder.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 01:28:36 PM
IF IT TURNS OUT THAT MEYER DID NOT REPORT:

This scenario, while serious, is MANY categories less serious than what went on under LAKS or Paterno. But what it seems to share in common - that I think ELA put into words nicely - is the philosophy of "hear no evil/see no evil" deniability...and how it just doesn't work these days.
First, yes, in all these situations it's probable that the head honcho knew what was happening. My point in this post is that maybe it doesn't even matter if they knew. Because not knowing would just be a different sign of a broken ship.
And captains who build broken ships (leaders who won't end up learning about serial abuse even when "everyone knows" because they didn't correctly build their culture), well, those captains should be stopped from sailing.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 01:31:02 PM
This scenario, while serious, is MANY categories less serious than what went on under LAKS or Paterno. But what it seems to share in common - that I think ELA put into words nicely - is the philosophy of "hear no evil/see no evil" deniability...and how it just doesn't work these days.
First, yes, in all these situations it's probable that the head honcho knew what was happening. My point in this post is that maybe it doesn't even matter if they knew. Because not knowing would just be a different sign of a broken ship.
And captains who build broken ships (leaders who won't end up learning about serial abuse even when "everyone knows" because they didn't correctly build their culture), well, those leaders should be stopped from sailing.
I give zero shits about free tats or paying players. I thought Tressell got a bit of a raw deal.
I have ZERO tolerance for things like child molestation or women beaters like Zach Smith. They are the scum of the earth. They should be executed. Forget jail. And people that enable them and look the other way like Paterno/Urban DID deserve to lose their jobs. Period.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 02, 2018, 01:41:48 PM
There is no dispute about the arrest in 2009.  
The question at hand is 2015.  There was no arrest.  Shelley Meyer encouraged her to press charges and she wouldn’t.  
The police investigated and also did not press
You have heard only one side- the side of someone who is going public only after her income source has dried up.
I would think you would like to hear what Zach Smith has to say and what Meyer had to say.
If you watch Urbans comments specifically he says “when we looked into 2015 there was nothing there”.
He also mentions “ what was reported is not what happened “.
I get the feeling there is a he said- she said aspect to this- so in that case what do you do?
Yah, after a night of reflection. I'm thinking after the media strom Meyer gets off on a technicality. 
Have I constructed the follow properly?
"2015 Incident": Zach beats Courtney, she calls the cops. Before the cops show up her parents talk her out of filing charges. Police show up, no charges are filed and that's why there is report with no names mentioned. Shelly sends texts encouraging Courtney to file charges. 3 years later Urban Meyer is asked about the 2015 incident, and replies he is unaware of a 2015 incident because there wasn't one.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: mcwterps1 on August 02, 2018, 01:44:15 PM
Bravo MDot. 

The days of being complicit, or turning a blind eye, should be over.

The only way to end corruption in society is to report it and to stamp it out.

It's hard to stomach some of the comments in here.

Almost sounds to me like if you see a guy showering with a bunch of teenage boys, you should just mind your own business.

If you know there's a guy on your staff that's beating the hell out of his wife, it's none of your business.

It's a pathetic sentiment and weak integrity. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 02, 2018, 01:45:06 PM
"If you lie, you can never coach again."

Hmmm. Wonder what self-righteous sanctimonious weasel said that? I wonder.
Former Baylor coach Art Briles, who was fired in the wake of the university's sexual assault scandal in 2016, has been hired to coach an American football team in Italy.
"It's a chance to get back on the field," he told ESPN by phone. "I'm excited. I really am. I'm grateful for the opportunity."
Briles will coach the Guelfi Firenze American football team in Florence, Italy. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 01:53:31 PM
Bravo MDot.

The days of being complicit, or turning a blind eye, should be over.

The only way to end corruption in society is to report it and to stamp it out.

It's hard to stomach some of the comments in here.

Almost sounds to me like if you see a guy showering with a bunch of teenage boys, you should just mind your own business.

If you know there's a guy on your staff that's beating the hell out of his wife, it's none of your business.

It's a pathetic sentiment and weak integrity.
yeah, I don't get it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 01:55:06 PM
No. Spoken like a true person who has ZERO tolerance for women beating pieces of shit like Zach Smith.
What you just wrote is spoken like a true fan who puts winning above morality.
There is ZERO chance that Urban didn't know this piece of human shit was beating on his wife. And he continued to give him cover and employ him.
Good lord get over yourself.  Read the whole thread 
Putting winning above morality?
What gives you the right to play god?  You have at best- one side of the story and half the facts 
If it turns out that ther is only one side- you won’t get any arguments from me. 
But everyone is entitled to a fair discovery. Even the coach that has been beating your teams ass like a rented mule.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 02:05:53 PM
3 years later Urban Meyer is asked about the 2015 incident, and replies he is unaware of a 2015 incident because there wasn't one.
It gets even mushier here. Not illegal and maybe not necessarily fireable, but probably still a lie. Because not knowing about an event report isn't the same as not knowing about an event.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 02:15:32 PM
Good lord get over yourself.  Read the whole thread
Putting winning above morality?
What gives you the right to play god?  You have at best- one side of the story and half the facts
If it turns out that ther is only one side- you won’t get any arguments from me.
But everyone is entitled to a fair discovery. Even the coach that has been beating your teams ass like a rented mule.  
I think you are the one who needs to read up on the situation at hand.
There are text messages from Shelley Meyer, text messages from other coaches wives on that staff, text messages that piece of shit Zach Smith sent her threatening her, and photos of the abuse. All documented
The guy was just arrested for violating a restraining order she had put out against him. You can't get a restraining order in Ohio unless you can prove that the person is a serious threat against you.
This psycho installed hidden cameras in her house to spy on her. The Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that police were called 9 times on him by her in the 6 years.
Get over YOURSELF.
This PIECE OF SHIT was beating her ass for 9 years and Urban Meyer knew about it and he still kept him employed all because he was a close friend of the family. Fuck Zach Smith. Fuck Urban Meyer for keeping him employed, and fuck ANYONE who defends either of these despicable excuses of human being.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 02:23:36 PM
fear not, that sad sack of shit Jay Paterno is on your side Buckeye nation!

https://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2018/08/02/jay-paterno-implores-ohio-state-to-stand-up-to-mob-mentality-in-making-decision-on-urban-meyer/
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 02:24:23 PM
I think you are the one who needs to read up on the situation at hand.
There are text messages from Shelley Meyer, text messages from other coaches wives on that staff, text messages that piece of shit Zach Smith sent her threatening her, and photos of the abuse. All documented
The guy was just arrested for violating a restraining order she had put out against him. You can't get a restraining order in Ohio unless you can prove that the person is a serious threat against you.
This psycho installed hidden cameras in her house to spy on her. The Cleveland Plain Dealer reported that police were called 9 times on him by her in the 6 years.
Get over YOURSELF.
This PIECE OF SHIT was beating her ass for 9 years and Urban Meyer knew about it and he still kept him employed all because he was a close friend of the family. Fuck Zach Smith. Fuck Urban Meyer for keeping him employed, and fuck ANYONE who defends either of these despicable excuses of human being.
I am not going to argue with you    
Let’s just agree on the fact that a person who hits women and anyone who covers for them are POS/ as well as anyone who defends it. 
The only thing we disagree on is whether a person accused of any of the above has a right to present their side and be heard. 
Some day if you or someone you care about is falsely accused- you will feel different and understand how important a person’ right to defend themselves is. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 02:28:10 PM
It gets even mushier here. Not illegal and maybe not necessarily fireable, but probably still a lie. Because not knowing about an event report isn't the same as not knowing about an event.
What he said was that when they looked into it now- there was nothing there.  It has already been reported that there was no arrest and smiths name was redacted from the police report- so in other words the authorities do not have enough to even press charges. Now why do you think that is?
Meyers wife employed her to press charges.  Why?
Lastly/ was their a risk of false termination at that point?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 02, 2018, 02:29:42 PM
Let's play nice fellas. It's what we do here.



This is a very touchy subject and can bring out anger and many other emotions. My wife was date raped in college, and to this day if I could ever find the guy, I'd... How's that for anger? It happened 15 years before I even met her. Fucking prick. I'll...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 02, 2018, 02:31:34 PM
What he said was that when they looked into it now- there was nothing there.  It has already been reported that there was no arrest and smiths name was redacted from the police report- so in other words the authorities do not have enough to even press charges. Now why do you think that is?
Meyers wife employed her to press charges.  Why?
Lastly/ was their a risk of false termination at that point?
They need a cooperative witness to press charges, and the wife's mother told her daughter to not press charges as it would hurt the family financially.
So, the wife's mother needs to be outed here too. The stupid bitch.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 02, 2018, 02:32:50 PM
I'm all for waiting for all the facts, but based on what has been made public, it's really difficult to believe Urban Meyer had zero knowledge of this situation. It's very interesting that some are more prone to rush to the defense of a football coach, asking for him to be protected and less worried about a woman who was clearly beat for a long period of time.

Urban has a history of being a liar. If that can't be acknowledged, there's a lot of heads in the sand. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 02:32:58 PM
What he said was that when they looked into it now- there was nothing there.  It has already been reported that there was no arrest and smiths name was redacted from the police report- so in other words the authorities do not have enough to even press charges. Now why do you think that is?
Meyers wife employed her to press charges.  Why?
Lastly/ was their a risk of false termination at that point?
I guess all those photos she has where he beat her are just photoshopped?
I guess in 2009 when he was arrested and she didn't press charges, she was only joking.
I guess when Shelley Meyer asked her about a restraining order and told her that "Zach scares me" - she was just blowing smoke.
There is one side to this story. He's a piece of fucking shit. He was beating her and the only reason he never saw jail time is because she kept refusing to press charges on her husband and the father of her children.
If Shelley Meyer knew, Urban Meyer knew. Period. They've been married for 30 years. She's known Zach most of his life through Urban's close connection to Bruce. Urban knew about the 2009 incident and he got his mentor/Smith's grandfather Earle Bruce on a plane and down to FL to talk to the couple and convince her not to press charges.
What's the other side of the story? She's photo shopping the pictures? All the text messages are fake? Give me a break.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 02, 2018, 02:41:00 PM
(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0091/7782/5338/products/sdfsdfdfdf_158bb13f-0ac3-4ca1-8bac-ea3ed1e28147_480x.JPG?v=1533216831)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 02, 2018, 02:52:35 PM
(https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0091/7782/5338/products/sdfsdfdfdf_158bb13f-0ac3-4ca1-8bac-ea3ed1e28147_480x.JPG?v=1533216831)
I saw that elsewhere. Probably need to take that one off the racks at the bookstore.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 02:52:50 PM
I'm all for waiting for all the facts, but based on what has been made public, it's really difficult to believe Urban Meyer had zero knowledge of this situation. It's very interesting that some are more prone to rush to the defense of a football coach, asking for him to be protected and less worried about a woman who was clearly beat for a long period of time.

Urban has a history of being a liar. If that can't be acknowledged, there's a lot of heads in the sand.
I think it is more interesting that fans of a certain school are the ones who seem to be rushing to judgement- and the same ones who characterize my call for at least getting the other side of the story as defending something so atrocious. Not a coincidence. 
It follows that that same fan base- when faced with media charges against their school- not only went into denial mode- but many still boycott that media outlet. 
Lastly-where does it say thatUrban claimed to know nothing about this?  He already clarified the 2009- and how it was reported to his superiors, and how and why he and his wife got involved. 
He also said he did look into the 2015 claims and without giving out personal details about smith or his wife- concluded ther was nothing there- which does jive with the police report. 
I think the odds are extremely high here- that Meyer learned enough to take more action than just play marriage counselor. But he at least deserves the investigation and opportunity to present his side 
Anyone who doesn’t understand this has their head buried in the sand- and gives the appearance of being more concerned with winning than the human beings involved.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 02, 2018, 02:57:36 PM
I saw that elsewhere. Probably need to take that one off the racks at the bookstore.
apparently, consumers took them ALL off the racks
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 02, 2018, 02:58:43 PM
   
Let’s just agree on the fact that a person who hits women and anyone who covers for them are POS/ as well as anyone who defends it.
The only thing we disagree on is whether a person accused of any of the above has a right to present their side and be heard.
Some day if you or someone you care about is falsely accused- you will feel different and understand how important a person’ right to defend themselves is.
I agree with this 100%.
I would hope how I have presented myself in previous discussions concerning illegal/decrepit behavior is one of let's gather as much information as we can before pass judgment. (and not that I'm just another OSU Homer who likes the W's.)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 03:13:26 PM
Bob Evans sausages/restaurants just announced they're dropping Urban Meyer, who has a deal with them to do commercials/spokesman.

https://www.bizjournals.com/columbus/news/2018/08/02/bob-evans-removes-urban-meyer-from-its-website.html?ana=twt

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MikeDeTiger on August 02, 2018, 03:22:27 PM
A few thoughts:

1)  I don't think there's any disagreement here that DV perps have done evil and need to be dealt with, and that society as a whole needs to improve every circumstance leading up to and surrounding problems like that.    

2)  But DAYUM, there is some unhealthy Guilty Until Proven Innocent present in our society, and it shows up in this thread too.  Jail Zack Smith, fire Urban Meyer, if that's what's warranted, but give them their due process, let them have their day in court with a jury that hasn't already mentally convicted them and a defense that does its job to the best of its ability.  Our justice system was founded partly on the principle of making the prosecution earn it, and I whole-heartedly agree with that.  Reacting emotionally, not allowing a defense or waiting for the conclusion of a full investigation, and comments like "FUCK EVERYBODY WHO DEFENDS THESE POS's!!!!" have never been the basis for justice.  It's the basis for a lynch mob.  

3)  Part of me fights off an inner smirk because I've always had a good time with Buckeye fans until Meyer was hired and I told them he was a scumbag POS at Florida and he'd likely be a scumbag POS there too.  Upon which some of them (a couple here) turned on me and told me what a hater I was.  That part of me wants this to end in tears, because among other things, I am a petty sumbitch.  

4)  FFS, do not engage in a straw man fallacy and think that anything in #3 should be interpreted as me being somehow happy that a woman was a victim of DV or overlooking that her horrific experiences are the actual story here.  Well, not here, or anywhere else, but her story SHOULD BE the story.  Urban Meyer, his shitbagness, and my childish sense of justification every time he proves it, should really be a footnote in the headlines and on the networks.  

5)  Hey guys.  Anybody found Stingray yet?  I miss that dude.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 02, 2018, 03:27:08 PM
Let's play nice fellas. It's what we do here.



This is a very touchy subject and can bring out anger and many other emotions. My wife was date raped in college, and to this day if I could ever find the guy, I'd... How's that for anger? It happened 15 years before I even met her. Fucking prick. I'll...
Condolences to your wife for what occurred to her. 
My spouse was also raped in college. A few years back the POS made a friend request to her on BookFace. She asked me what to do, and I advised to her to destroy an information she had concerning him, because if her current husband (me) can track him down, I'll be spending time in Jail. You're right it's an emotional subject.
On the flip side, my wife's current co-worker complained almost daily about her husband, making assertions of (non-physical) emotional and psychological abuse (I remember having this quoted to me; "He threaten to take their daughter and leave if she told her mom about another argument they had.") I went to college with the guy and considered him a friend, I took him out for wings several times to try and get his side of the story (without betraying that his spouse is complaining about him) but all he would tell me was how great their marriage was. (Even if I shared a hard thing my wife and I were doing, he would offer to pray for us, not share anything bad in his own marriage.) I kept saying we have to report it. After a year and a half of listening to her-coworker complain about her abusive husband I finally got my wife to agree to talking to our church pastor (they also attended our church.) We sat down in a mediated group and they as a couple agreed to counseling. They are still married, but now the co-worker considers my wife an enemy for betraying her, and spreads gossip about my wife at work. I've lost my college friend. I think in co-worker case she just wants to be miserable. It took a year and a half of almost daily complaints to get my wife to be willing to talk about it, cost her a friend, and made for tougher workplace. Hopefully the Abuse stops, we are no longer in a place to receive any updates.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 02, 2018, 03:28:02 PM
I think it is more interesting that fans of a certain school are the ones who seem to be rushing to judgement- and the same ones who characterize my call for at least getting the other side of the story as defending something so atrocious. Not a coincidence.
It follows that that same fan base- when faced with media charges against their school- not only went into denial mode- but many still boycott that media outlet.
Lastly-where does it say thatUrban claimed to know nothing about this?  He already clarified the 2009- and how it was reported to his superiors, and how and why he and his wife got involved.
He also said he did look into the 2015 claims and without giving out personal details about smith or his wife- concluded ther was nothing there- which does jive with the police report.
I think the odds are extremely high here- that Meyer learned enough to take more action than just play marriage counselor. But he at least deserves the investigation and opportunity to present his side
Anyone who doesn’t understand this has their head buried in the sand- and gives the appearance of being more concerned with winning than the human beings involved.  
So you're blaming my opinion on being a Michigan fan? Pretty weak response honestly. I've read a couple articles and listened to local, pro-buckeye radio stations on my way home from work yesterday and every radio presence said it looked bad for Urban.
When did he claim not to know about it? Well, at the Big Ten media day when he said last night was the first he heard of the 2015 incident. The played the audio on the radio. Texts from his wife to the victim clearly state that Urban doesn't know how he wants to handle it.
I'm not burn him at the stake guy as I'd like to hear more facts, but the facts that have been released and his public statements are pretty damning at minimum, that he blatantly lied when originally asked. For clarity, I'm not saying he should be fired for that alone.
I don't think it was his job to play marriage counselor, but the fact he continued to keep him on his staff along with his history says a lot. The people you choose to surround yourself over long periods of time say a lot about the person. Again, not a reason to fire someone, but a reason I can have an opinion on character.
And let's be clear since you want to say my personal opinion is solely because I'm a Michigan fan. I have disliked Urban Meyer since 2002. If we go to the WayBackMachine and dig up the collegefootballnews, I'm sure we can find some posts of me ranting about UM. I watched him lie to personal friends that played for him, only to watch him do the same to Utah players a couple years later, then have a team full of inmates running the asylum at Florida. The dude should call Tim Tebow every day for creating a distraction and making him look like a decent human being. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 03:41:12 PM
I remember you said you had a run in with him at BG,I believe that.He is definitely a self absorbed primma donna
maybe narcissistic.The only thing was in 2015 Smith's wife denied/didn't press charges and Smith himself denied any wrong doing.Now anything before/after Urban better have reported it up or he's toast IMO,Ka sura-sura
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 02, 2018, 03:44:38 PM
So you're blaming my opinion on being a Michigan fan? Pretty weak response honestly. I've read a couple articles and listened to local, pro-buckeye radio stations on my way home from work yesterday and every radio presence said it looked bad for Urban.
When did he claim not to know about it? Well, at the Big Ten media day when he said last night was the first he heard of the 2015 incident. The played the audio on the radio. Texts from his wife to the victim clearly state that Urban doesn't know how he wants to handle it.
I'm not burn him at the stake guy as I'd like to hear more facts, but the facts that have been released and his public statements are pretty damning at minimum, that he blatantly lied when originally asked. For clarity, I'm not saying he should be fired for that alone.
I don't think it was his job to play marriage counselor, but the fact he continued to keep him on his staff along with his history says a lot. The people you choose to surround yourself over long periods of time say a lot about the person. Again, not a reason to fire someone, but a reason I can have an opinion on character.
And let's be clear since you want to say my personal opinion is solely because I'm a Michigan fan. I have disliked Urban Meyer since 2002. If we go to the WayBackMachine and dig up the collegefootballnews, I'm sure we can find some posts of me ranting about UM. I watched him lie to personal friends that played for him, only to watch him do the same to Utah players a couple years later, then have a team full of inmates running the asylum at Florida. The dude should call Tim Tebow every day for creating a distraction and making him look like a decent human being.

What I am saying is- there only seems to be a couple posters here rushing to judgement. 
And there are only a couple that define my desire for a fair discovery- as defending a coach because wins mean more 
After I have said repeatedly that if what is being assumed is all true and ther is no other side to this- fire his ass-  - -that is not a reasonable position to take 
If the shoe fits ....
I have been clear on your position from the beginning.   You have been consistent.
Why would you take the MDOT hothead approach instead of agreeing with the basic principle of a fair trial?  You called me out for defending Meyer.  I have yet to approach Doing that.   
Meyer deserves his day in court- not today’s PC over the top lunch mob mentality.   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 03:57:17 PM
https://watchstadium.com/videos/141385?utm_source&utm_campaign=default&utm_term=default
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 02, 2018, 04:11:55 PM
I've been told by many that mental abuse is even worse than physical abuse. The latter heals. In some cases, the former never does.




Damn. I wish it was something more than this thread that brought back so many old posters.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 04:27:49 PM
847 it's creeping closer to the season so it's slow process migration
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 02, 2018, 04:30:42 PM
  Hey guys.  Anybody found Stingray yet?  I miss that dude.  
Not sure if he made it over here or not.Bama Buckeye & Buckeye Crazy have been scarce also
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 02, 2018, 05:10:55 PM
They need a cooperative witness to press charges, and the wife's mother told her daughter to not press charges as it would hurt the family financially.
So, the wife's mother needs to be outed here too. The stupid bitch.
I don't think that they do need a cooperative witness to press charges.  An attorney from Ohio would be better at speaking to this but in Ohio there is a law that the Police are supposed to press charges in any DV situation if they feel that it occurred (or something to that effect).  In practice, if the Police showed up and Smith's wife was visibly beat up, then under Ohio law the Police should have arrested Smith whether or not the wife wanted an arrest.  
That is an important piece of information regarding the 2015 incident.  A lot of people on here are assuming the police didn't press charges because Smith's wife didn't want them to.  I don't think that legally can be the case under Ohio law.  I think the only reason they can decline to charge is if they don't believe it happened.  If that is the case then I have a hard time blaming Urban.  The police were aware, what more could he have done?  Granted, he could have fired Smith but in that case he would have been firing him for something the police didn't think he did.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 02, 2018, 05:19:35 PM
I probably mis-spoke. I'm not a lawyer - I hate those. All of them. Every one of them.



Anyway, Isn't it highly unlikely they could get a conviction without a cooperative witness in a DV case?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 02, 2018, 05:20:48 PM
Meyer deserves his day in court- not today’s PC over the top lunch mob mentality.  
unfortunately, Meyer is gonna get both.  Regardless of what he deserves.
today's PC over the top mob is very strong at Universities across the nation and they are allowed to have power and presence
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 02, 2018, 06:23:24 PM
I probably mis-spoke. I'm not a lawyer - I hate those. All of them. Every one of them.



Anyway, Isn't it highly unlikely they could get a conviction without a cooperative witness in a DV case?
As hopefully a tolerable lawyer (to you at least), I would say, yes, it is highly unlikely.  The scenario would almost certainly require direct eye witness testimony.     Statutory construction can help illustrate why this is so.
Most 'Battery' statutes, and that's how many state's charge these cases (some call it 'Assault'), include the following language:
Actually and intentionally touches or strikes another person against the will of the other; or (maybe it includes this)

2. Intentionally causes bodily harm to another person.

You can see the problem when you don't have a cooperative witness/victim.
The Prosecutor must introduce testimony that the battery was 'against the will' of the victim.
(something like this) DA: Ms. Victim, how did you sustain your injuries?   Ms. Victim, did you give the defendant permission to strike you?
 
If you don't have this,  and of course then afford the Defendant their constitutional right to cross-examine the accuser, you don't have a case.  It would be quite difficult to win a case like this, w/o getting too deep in the weeds, the introduction of hearsay is challenging, without hitting certain exceptions (mainly availability of a witness).  Unless I could establish that the victim had vanished, and was legitimately unavailable, I'm gonna get crushed by the defense counsel.
I just checked, I had four battery cases in the fall of 2003,  2 of my victims refused to testify, or even contact the office after we filed the case.  So I had a police report, pictures, physical evidence, but at a trial, I have got very little.  why?  All I could do is call to the stand the police officer who took the complaint, interviewed the Vic, took the pictures.  It's her version of events (not under oath) presented to a law enforcement officer in a police report, without a witness to the actual battery, since she won't testify.  The cop swears in an affidavit, and that's good enough for arresting and charging the case.  For all we know her sister or jealous ex boyfriend roughed her up.  I can't place the defendant at the home when she sustained the injuries.   I could roll in twenty five friends of hers with text messages, still not good enough.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MikeDeTiger on August 02, 2018, 06:33:30 PM
Not sure if he made it over here or not.Bama Buckeye & Buckeye Crazy have been scarce also
Bummer about Stingray.  I wish I had an email address or something.  That guy was cool.  I know Buckeye Crazy IRL, so I get to talk to her every now and again, when we have time.  I used to like talking to Bama Buckeye on here...he was one of the Bucks who took a sharp turn on me when I voiced my opinion on Meyer-to-Buckeyes back in 2012 or whenever....but he's still okay in my book.    
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MikeDeTiger on August 02, 2018, 06:35:07 PM

Damn. I wish it was something more than this thread that brought back so many old posters.
You caught me.  I have been on the B12 board a bit lately.  I didn't know anything about this until about noon today, saw somebody mention something on an LSU site and I didn't know what they were referring to, so I knew where to come to get the info from people who would know and be talking about it.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MikeDeTiger on August 02, 2018, 06:43:40 PM
So how long until Urban finds himself on Nick Saban's staff?
Say, a week after they back into the playoff after missing the SEC Championship game again?  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 07:51:42 PM
We can do this conversation better - myself included.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 02, 2018, 07:52:37 PM
Word that Dwan Mathis reached out to MSU about flipping back, and was told no.
And sounds like he may have flipped to Oregon.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 02, 2018, 08:14:41 PM
I do agree w Medina.  All places im familiar with the policy is to arrest the offender if at the scene.  That's not the same thing as charging a defendant w battery.  Of course that's more complicated if the cops find out about the battery after a point at which there s no defendant to arrest.   Then there s either an arrest warrant or summons issued to the defendant.   At some point though the witness needs to made available.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 02, 2018, 08:20:11 PM
It’s a bit disingenuous to say we have one side of the story with the text messages and pictures, unless you believe they are made up. Urban’s wife, the Director of Football Ops wife all allude to the disgusting behavior of an absuive spouse, on top of those text messages stating it’s a known thing amongst the coaches. Heck, Zach smith’s own text even acknowledged it by saying he had sought treatment for it, followed by saying he would destroy her.

Urban knew. Just last week at media days he said he and his wife discuss everything. He brought her to help counsel Smith and his wife while in Florida for the 09 issues. Should we also ignore the Cleveland paper noting the multiple times police came to the home.

That is one persistent scheme by a spouse with no real end game, until now. Courtney dragged the family through a 9!! year conspiratorial plot to bring her husband through the mud just now. All in the name of losing the income source for her and her family. I have trouble reconciling that.

And to push the no charges thing after all we have elarn d about domestic violence is sad. I wonder why the wife of coaching legends grandson, in a football crazed town wouldn’t pursue a very public court process? Note, he is the sole income earner for the family at $400+k a year. Take a look at the comments about her photos on brett mcmurpjy’s Facebook page and tell me why she wouldn’t have reported sooner.

https://twitter.com/slmandel/status/1024703004849532928?s=12 (https://twitter.com/slmandel/status/1024703004849532928?s=12)

Let’s not lose site of who the abuser was (Zach Smith) but a lot of individuals are to blame for where this has landed in the last week.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 02, 2018, 08:20:17 PM
And sounds like he may have flipped to Oregon.
first domino falls in recruiting. probably won't be the last.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: mcwterps1 on August 02, 2018, 08:47:39 PM
LOL

PC=Respect

I don't know anyone who doesn't demand respect,  but keep whining about "PC".

"No, dammit! If I want to be an asshole to someone, disrespect them, and berate them, I should be allowed without the PC police! Wait...what did you say about 'guns and religion' you disrespecting a-hole?".

I love those who whine about "PC". Easy targets, because they're just as sensitive, if not more, than anyone else. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 02, 2018, 09:58:40 PM
On page one of this thread (the last time I posted on this), I stated Urb would not be fired over this.  I had not realized at the time there was a new clause in his contract or the rules he had to follow as a state employee (the requirement to report).   Perhaps I'll be wrong, but I'm not sure how Urban can avoid being fired without the state having issues of enforcement or double standards.

That's assuming of course, I understand all the posts/tweets/articles correctly.   I have been traveling..
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 02, 2018, 10:07:32 PM
What he said was that when they looked into it now- there was nothing there.  It has already been reported that there was no arrest and smiths name was redacted from the police report- so in other words the authorities do not have enough to even press charges. Now why do you think that is?
Meyers wife employed her to press charges.  Why?
Lastly/ was their a risk of false termination at that point?
You press charges for generally two reasons most of the time (a lawyer can correct me on this)
1. There is a sense a conviction can be achieved
2. They can be used to leverage a plea
Now just because I can’t convict someone (an especially big challenge in DV cases), doesn’t mean the thing didn’t happen. Before 1970, one could not rape their spouse in a legal sense. But you bet it could happen. And courts don’t aim to take on really long shot cases just because.
Innocent until proven guilty ends up being a rather narrow guiding principle. It just is. Innocent people can be put in pretrial jail for months on end until it’s easier to say they’re guilty to something lesser just to ease the financial burdan. Likewise, by its nature, it means many guilty people will not be found that way by any system.
A million dollar job and small fiefdom is a privilege, not a right. As Ramzy said, there was a longterm stink on Smith. Urban chose to keep that around. And that can always cost. 
(Also, someone did a close listen to his big ten media day comment. An interesting detail was him kind of waiving off the 2009 thing as “they were a young couple.” This in reference to someone possibly being drunk and bouncing his pregnant wife off the wall. As a high-profile human, that in itself seems an issue)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 02, 2018, 10:13:52 PM
There’s also a consistent argument to wait for “the facts to come out.”

Most of the time they don’t or won’t. It’s not how this is handled. And what often happens is standards of skepticism rise and fall based on other factors. It’s hard not to be guilty of it. 

In the end, I think there’s a certain level of cynicism, maybe even less than we should have. I don’t assume most people are that moral, and I assume most coaches are far more amoral than average. Watch a coach carpet bomb a kid with f-bombs, then say that’s a sign of love. They operate with different social rules, which often leads to that disconnect. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 02, 2018, 10:32:54 PM
I wonder, does McMurphy investigate this story if Urb merely said 'no comment' or some such 'I'm not going to discuss that matter here.'  (during media day)?   His answer, while not necessarily intentional, volunteered information.  I admit to not having read all of McMurphy's report carefully to construct his time line. (which is why I haven't commented on fate of Urban, only to point out the real life challenges from handling DV cases from a police/prosecutors standpoint, which of course are wholly unrelated to whether or not Urban Meyer should be fired, punished, etc.)

Yes, it is a horrible tragedy that victims are intimidated, pressured, coerced into not coming forward.  All day, I agree.  It is so GD frustrating when you work these cases.  I mean it, next to crimes against children, toughest cases to work mentally for me were DV.   In part, this is why large counties devote FT staff to being Victim Witness Coordinators.  Unfortunately, it is often not enough.    At the same time,  we can't go convicting people of crimes (DV, rape, etc.) based on hearsay.  The Sixth Amendment is a very real right for all of us, not some right made-up by men and women in robes.   The defendant has a right to confront the witness, and that means in court, not a sworn affidavit, not appearing by video conference, not on a transcript of text messages to the most honest and reliable of witnesses.

This isn't a defense of Smith, Meyer or tOSU, or anybody else.   These people and parties can and should face their own consequences based on their actions or inactions.  Whether the remedies are civil, criminal (for Smith), or merely administrative, they ought not be conducted by a social media/old fashioned media mob.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 11:08:25 PM
LOL

PC=Respect

I don't know anyone who doesn't demand respect,  but keep whining about "PC".

"No, dammit! If I want to be an asshole to someone, disrespect them, and berate them, I should be allowed without the PC police! Wait...what did you say about 'guns and religion' you disrespecting a-hole?".

I love those who whine about "PC". Easy targets, because they're just as sensitive, if not more, than anyone else.
Though it’s objectively good to be nice to people – or at the very least to not be actively offensive – political correctness will never be a practical way to fix this about the world because its spirit of scolding is egotistical and off-putting, making it right for the wrong reason, which naturally causes the objects of its scolding to double down.
We deserve a more humble formula than “HOW DARE YOU, and now that I’ve stolen your attention, guess who also knows the best way for you to live?” Because even if the person saying HOW DARE YOU is correct about something that really matters, their style comprehensively fails. (...) Turns out that "It's not what you say but how you say it" wasn't just a lesson for toddlers.
Unfortunately, the schism between these two sides has become one of the most entrenched aspects of modern western identity and has fueled a sizable chunk of our current volatilty. And tragically, these fights that seem so meaty and essential are usually empty. I.E.: there are good people on the non-PC side who aren't being offensive for offensiveness's sake but rather to spite the PCers for thinking they had the right to be so sanctimonious about anything in the first place.
As for me, I'll admit I lean progressive on most matters, but I see PCness as a sickness and believe that finding a more patient and non-judgy way to express that "being a dick is fine if you're into that but actually, man, just try not to" is one of the most important upcoming social revolutions.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 02, 2018, 11:12:15 PM
You press charges for generally two reasons most of the time (a lawyer can correct me on this)
1. There is a sense a conviction can be achieved
2. They can be used to leverage a plea
Now just because I can’t convict someone (an especially big challenge in DV cases), doesn’t mean the thing didn’t happen. Before 1970, one could not rape their spouse in a legal sense. But you bet it could happen. And courts don’t aim to take on really long shot cases just because.
Innocent until proven guilty ends up being a rather narrow guiding principle. It just is. Innocent people can be put in pretrial jail for months on end until it’s easier to say they’re guilty to something lesser just to ease the financial burdan. Likewise, by its nature, it means many guilty people will not be found that way by any system.
I've never seen a case charged based on a sense of conviction. (no offense to the remark) Going to trial? Now that requires the DA to look at the case again and evaluate the stakes.  It is quite embarrassing, unethical  and damaging to a DA's office to charge people with crimes which can't get past go.  Go=probable cause.  You only charge when you have PC.  You don't have it (even with a sense of guilt by the defendant) you gotta go get it.
Once a person is arrested (and in custody), that person must be brought before a judge or magistrate within 48 hours.  At that point the State must produce a criminal complaint demonstrating there is a probable cause that the charging crime was committed (must identify the criminal statute) AND probable cause that it was committed by the defendant.  This is typically presented on a few pages, describes the who what when and where, and it must be signed by some sworn official (usually a law enforcement officer, or prosecutor (sometimes a game warden).  If they can't do this, the person is released from custody immediately.   If State can get to this stage later, they can summon the person, or issue an arrest warrant. (This is common in DV, when a victim comes forward a day or few days later).
It is at this time the person is read the charges, right to atty, etc.  Then bail is determined.  A case like this, probably not cash bail, but certainly all kinds of no contact conditions.   Defendant signs signature bond, leaves, comes back for next appearance (arraignment), where they formally plead NG (usually).  In between Bail Hearing and Arraignment, this is the likeliest time the Defendant and DA discuss any plea bargain, if any is offered.   This is also when the DA typically learns whether or not the Victim is A. reliable, and B. going to testify.   You can count on the Defendant telling his/her lawyer,  'she ain't going to talk'.   Again, defense counsel stressed on this point too.  Who's for real?
Plea bargains in DV and OWI cases are extremely closely examined by DAs office, every women's group in the public,  MAAD, etc.   In any other non-violent crime,  yes, plea bargains are valuable tools of efficiency, supported by both sides of the bar, and the courts.   What are you really pleading 'down' to, when you have a unreliable witness in a misdemeanor battery case.  Criminal Disorderly Conduct is a 'fav' of the State.   
#For sake of discussion, let's assume the charges are misdemeanor, and not felonies (which would require either an indictment by a grand jury (filing of an 'Information')  or a preliminary hearing (a mini probable cause hearing).  That's where a defendant could very well be 'in custody' because there's cash bail which they can't post, for an extended period of time, but of course, they could exercise their right to a speedy trial.  That means the Preliminary Hearing has to take place in 10 days, with trail to follow 20 days later.  Majority of DV cases are charged as simple battery.   Substantial battery (felony assault) would bring all of this into play.  A plea bargain at this level, is incredibly scrutinized, only signed off on by Deputy or above, and usually not w/o full support of the Victim Witness Coordinator.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 11:14:58 PM
You press charges for generally two reasons most of the time (a lawyer can correct me on this)
1. There is a sense a conviction can be achieved
2. They can be used to leverage a plea
Now just because I can’t convict someone (an especially big challenge in DV cases), doesn’t mean the thing didn’t happen. Before 1970, one could not rape their spouse in a legal sense. But you bet it could happen. And courts don’t aim to take on really long shot cases just because.
Innocent until proven guilty ends up being a rather narrow guiding principle. It just is. Innocent people can be put in pretrial jail for months on end until it’s easier to say they’re guilty to something lesser just to ease the financial burdan. Likewise, by its nature, it means many guilty people will not be found that way by any system.
A million dollar job and small fiefdom is a privilege, not a right. As Ramzy said, there was a longterm stink on Smith. Urban chose to keep that around. And that can always cost. 
(Also, someone did a close listen to his big ten media day comment. An interesting detail was him kind of waiving off the 2009 thing as “they were a young couple.” This in reference to someone possibly being drunk and bouncing his pregnant wife off the wall. As a high-profile human, that in itself seems an issue)
That really resonates with my outlook. Guilt by judge and jury is a useful and sacred convention, but it isn't objective guilt. I fear how we'd recoil if we could learn the percentage of unconvicted, guilty people.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 02, 2018, 11:18:46 PM
Time and again leaders that almost always have sound judgement and are wildly successful get trapped because of those they keep around. 

Loyalty can be a major blindspot. It has ruined CEO’s, politicians, religious leaders and coaches. Bringing up names will probably garner debates we don’t want to get into. But you tend to fall one of two ways. Through your own undoing ( see Bobby Petrino ) or through a tangled web of what you have kept around you for too long.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 02, 2018, 11:22:12 PM
Getting back to the bare bones: In this specific case, I think it can't be understated the significance that OSU's president is Michael Drake, not Gordon Gee. I'm not saying that this alone portends a future firing. But I think that and the wrestling scandal go most of the way to explaining why Meyer was immediately placed on administrative leave.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 02, 2018, 11:28:11 PM
unfortunately, Meyer is gonna get both.  Regardless of what he deserves.
today's PC over the top mob is very strong at Universities across the nation and they are allowed to have power and presence
The left eating itself.  If you're not left enough, then you're on the right, somehow.  It's all so broken, from politics to college football coaching.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ALA2262 on August 03, 2018, 12:28:31 AM
So how long until Urban finds himself on Nick Saban's staff?
Urban just became 'Next HC at ND'. Or LSU.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 03, 2018, 06:30:54 AM
I've never seen a case charged based on a sense of conviction. (no offense to the remark) Going to trial? Now that requires the DA to look at the case again and evaluate the stakes.  It is quite embarrassing, unethical  and damaging to a DA's office to charge people with crimes which can't get past go.  Go=probable cause.  You only charge when you have PC.  You don't have it (even with a sense of guilt by the defendant) you gotta go get it.
Once a person is arrested (and in custody), that person must be brought before a judge or magistrate within 48 hours.  At that point the State must produce a criminal complaint demonstrating there is a probable cause that the charging crime was committed (must identify the criminal statute) AND probable cause that it was committed by the defendant.  This is typically presented on a few pages, describes the who what when and where, and it must be signed by some sworn official (usually a law enforcement officer, or prosecutor (sometimes a game warden).  If they can't do this, the person is released from custody immediately.   If State can get to this stage later, they can summon the person, or issue an arrest warrant. (This is common in DV, when a victim comes forward a day or few days later).
It is at this time the person is read the charges, right to atty, etc.  Then bail is determined.  A case like this, probably not cash bail, but certainly all kinds of no contact conditions.   Defendant signs signature bond, leaves, comes back for next appearance (arraignment), where they formally plead NG (usually).  In between Bail Hearing and Arraignment, this is the likeliest time the Defendant and DA discuss any plea bargain, if any is offered.   This is also when the DA typically learns whether or not the Victim is A. reliable, and B. going to testify.   You can count on the Defendant telling his/her lawyer,  'she ain't going to talk'.   Again, defense counsel stressed on this point too.  Who's for real?
Plea bargains in DV and OWI cases are extremely closely examined by DAs office, every women's group in the public,  MAAD, etc.   In any other non-violent crime,  yes, plea bargains are valuable tools of efficiency, supported by both sides of the bar, and the courts.   What are you really pleading 'down' to, when you have a unreliable witness in a misdemeanor battery case.  Criminal Disorderly Conduct is a 'fav' of the State.  
#For sake of discussion, let's assume the charges are misdemeanor, and not felonies (which would require either an indictment by a grand jury (filing of an 'Information')  or a preliminary hearing (a mini probable cause hearing).  That's where a defendant could very well be 'in custody' because there's cash bail which they can't post, for an extended period of time, but of course, they could exercise their right to a speedy trial.  That means the Preliminary Hearing has to take place in 10 days, with trail to follow 20 days later.  Majority of DV cases are charged as simple battery.   Substantial battery (felony assault) would bring all of this into play.  A plea bargain at this level, is incredibly scrutinized, only signed off on by Deputy or above, and usually not w/o full support of the Victim Witness Coordinator.  
Tips cap and defers to the expert. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 03, 2018, 07:12:13 AM
Some information or disinformation about the victim is getting out there that makes her sound bat sh!t crazy.   Not sure how The OSU is going to handle it but it's going to take a while.  Like weeks if not months.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 07:16:25 AM
Some information or disinformation about the victim is getting out there that makes her sound bat sh!t crazy.   Not sure how The OSU is going to handle it but it's going to take a while.  Like weeks if not months.  
I'm highly, highly, skeptical of these claims.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 03, 2018, 07:22:51 AM
Though it’s objectively good to be nice to people – or at the very least to not be actively offensive – political correctness will never be a practical way to fix this about the world because its spirit of scolding is egotistical and off-putting, making it right for the wrong reason, which naturally causes the objects of its scolding to double down.
We deserve a more humble formula than “HOW DARE YOU, and now that I’ve stolen your attention, guess who also knows the best way for you to live?” Because even if the person saying HOW DARE YOU is correct about something that really matters, their style comprehensively fails. (...) Turns out that "It's not what you say but how you say it" wasn't just a lesson for toddlers.
Unfortunately, the schism between these two sides has become one of the most entrenched aspects of modern western identity and has fueled a sizable chunk of our current volatilty. And tragically, these fights that seem so meaty and essential are usually empty. I.E.: there are good people on the non-PC side who aren't being offensive for offensiveness's sake but rather to spite the PCers for thinking they had the right to be so sanctimonious about anything in the first place.
As for me, I'll admit I lean progressive on most matters, but I see PCness as a sickness and believe that finding a more patient and non-judgy way to express that "being a dick is fine if you're into that but actually, man, just try not to" is one of the most important upcoming social revolutions.
I think we’re at a point where it’s sometimes hard to get a handle on exactly what PC means anymore. At best, it’s sort of a frenzied call to action/shaming oft attributed vaguely to one part of the political spectrum (trying to avoid full-on politics, should delete if I stray)
At it’s historical root, it seems like a brand of seeing the world, usually trying to see it for the better and not trying to hurt others (maybe certain others?), but delivered in a holier than thou way. The opposite not-PC was something to be indulged in, mirthfullness about the world that was somehow self-satisfying. 
But the thing is, everyone has feelings and gets offended about different things. There’s certainly some stuff that is objectively “politically correct” that some “un-PC” folks will get very offended by. Hopefully we find a way to turn down the vitriol. (Lord knows, sports fans are among the most finely sensitive humans imaginable. We’re all not that different)
Now let’s turn to this case: what’s PC here is ... at its root what? Is it the idea that hitting a women and supporting is so explosive it should cost people dearly?(probably not based on that wall at OSU) Is it the believing the woman at all at face value? Or is it the speed and the way it turns to 11 so fast? I suppose the root would be that believing someone who says they got hit is “PC” and the un-PC thing would be to ask, are there a lot of women who fabricate these things? 
Or is it that PC has become a catchall for a kind of frenzy that links to a sort of vague sense of impropriety?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 03, 2018, 07:26:11 AM
PCness has become a political crowbar.  Maybe it always was.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 03, 2018, 07:32:47 AM
PCness has become a political crowbar.  Maybe it always was.
The weird part is un-PCness has evolved into a far more effective one. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 07:54:37 AM
I'm convinced of 3 things after flipping back/forth between ESPN & BTN.Shelly Meyer will be fired/step down from her position at tOSU - if indeed it was her that had theses pictures(unless she reported up).And for 9 years on/off MRS Smith didn't come forward until her ex loses their income - then she talks to a blog.Going to the police straight up 5 years ago prolly helps her case & credibility.Is she a victim - yes,was she forthcoming - no.Wonder if she went to the hospital after that bloody hand incident.If Urbz reported none of this up they should be wrapping up the details of his departure right now
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 03, 2018, 07:59:11 AM
It’s a bit disingenuous to say we have one side of the story with the text messages and pictures, unless you believe they are made up. Urban’s wife, the Director of Football Ops wife all allude to the disgusting behavior of an absuive spouse, on top of those text messages stating it’s a known thing amongst the coaches. Heck, Zach smith’s own text even acknowledged it by saying he had sought treatment for it, followed by saying he would destroy her.

Urban knew. Just last week at media days he said he and his wife discuss everything. He brought her to help counsel Smith and his wife while in Florida for the 09 issues. Should we also ignore the Cleveland paper noting the multiple times police came to the home.

That is one persistent scheme by a spouse with no real end game, until now. Courtney dragged the family through a 9!! year conspiratorial plot to bring her husband through the mud just now. All in the name of losing the income source for her and her family. I have trouble reconciling that.

And to push the no charges thing after all we have elarn d about domestic violence is sad. I wonder why the wife of coaching legends grandson, in a football crazed town wouldn’t pursue a very public court process? Note, he is the sole income earner for the family at $400+k a year. Take a look at the comments about her photos on brett mcmurpjy’s Facebook page and tell me why she wouldn’t have reported sooner.

https://twitter.com/slmandel/status/1024703004849532928?s=12 (https://twitter.com/slmandel/status/1024703004849532928?s=12)

Let’s not lose site of who the abuser was (Zach Smith) but a lot of individuals are to blame for where this has landed in the last week.
Disingenuous?    I find that point of view more than a little bit troubling  
I don’t know of anybody who is questioning whether Zack Smith physically abused his wife.  
But to say that his boss should be fired for without knowing whether he reported it to his superiors, what he knew and when he knew it, well that’s just ridiculous  
If you watch the tape of her interview around 11 minute mark you’ll notice that she admitted that for a very long time she did not share the physical part of the booths with anybody because she was embarrassed and I understand that sentiment. But wouldn’t you like to know at what point did she exactly review the physical abuse part of it? And would you like to know what the police told Ohio State authorities when they investigated that incident? Wouldn’t you like to know if they’re feeling was No presumption of guilt based on the evidence and they were not willing to press charges even if she was? And wouldn’t you like to know at what point did Meyers wife reveal things to him? And then wouldn’t you like to know what he did or did not do about it? Are those not fair and reasonable questions to ask on behalf of a person who did not directly do anything wrong but whose life and career could go down in flames?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 08:21:13 AM
That's right. Everything hinges on whether Meyer reported up. I might add one more caveat, though, and that is if he didn't report up because he says he never knew**, then that wouldn't clear his responsibility either, because it was his job to know things like this.

**(this is probably just a silly 0.01% scenario, since none of us seem to be able to fathom how he wouldn't know)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 03, 2018, 08:30:42 AM
That's right. Everything hinges on whether Meyer reported up. I might add one more caveat, though, and that is if he didn't report up because he says he never knew**, then that wouldn't clear his responsibility either, because it was his job to know things like this.

**(this is probably just a silly 0.01% scenario, since none of us seem to be able to fathom how he wouldn't know)
Well said. I would further add the question of “what” he knew- so in other words, how much things were filtered to him.  
If things were kept from him or watered down, I would feel like not only is he accountable for creating or allowing that culture- but potentially some other coaches or administration should be held accountable as well.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 08:35:55 AM
 
If you watch the tape of her interview around 11 minute mark you’ll notice that she admitted that for a very long time she did not share the physical part of the booths with anybody because she was embarrassed and I understand that sentiment.
At the 11 minute mark she also contradicts herself as she sure as shit shared it with Shelley Meyer(pictures,texts).She put financial stability in front of the best interests of her children both emotionally/physically.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 08:42:19 AM
I think we’re at a point where it’s sometimes hard to get a handle on exactly what PC means anymore. At best, it’s sort of a frenzied call to action/shaming oft attributed vaguely to one part of the political spectrum (trying to avoid full-on politics, should delete if I stray)
At it’s historical root, it seems like a brand of seeing the world, usually trying to see it for the better and not trying to hurt others (maybe certain others?), but delivered in a holier than thou way. The opposite not-PC was something to be indulged in, mirthfullness about the world that was somehow self-satisfying.
But the thing is, everyone has feelings and gets offended about different things. There’s certainly some stuff that is objectively “politically correct” that some “un-PC” folks will get very offended by. Hopefully we find a way to turn down the vitriol. (Lord knows, sports fans are among the most finely sensitive humans imaginable. We’re all not that different)
Now let’s turn to this case: what’s PC here is ... at its root what? Is it the idea that hitting a women and supporting is so explosive it should cost people dearly?(probably not based on that wall at OSU) Is it the believing the woman at all at face value? Or is it the speed and the way it turns to 11 so fast? I suppose the root would be that believing someone who says they got hit is “PC” and the un-PC thing would be to ask, are there a lot of women who fabricate these things?
Or is it that PC has become a catchall for a kind of frenzy that links to a sort of vague sense of impropriety?
It's a fair and standing question. 
Trying to distill it into something that is broadly consistent here: To me, PCness is any reaction that notices some disappointing or hurtful social habit and can't help but respond as holier-than-thou. It's probably seen as almost exclusively belonging to the left. But I like the definition to be broader to emphasize that the entire problem is the sanctimony ... and arrogance isnt restricted to either pole of the political spectrum.
As for this specific case, I suppose my definition would say that what is PC about it is:
(a) even when we don't have enough facts to *know* the woman is being honest, to acknowledge when the claim of DV is credible and recognize that because this is a pressure point, women in these situations often have their credibility targeted without merit
(b) and then the holier-than-thouness ramps the noise on this to 11 reeeeally fast.
But option A is probably interchangeable. It's probably also in the PC category to say that:
(a) harboring or ignoring a serial abuser damages communities and in either case is the leader's fault
(b) and then the holier-than-thouness demands a scalp
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 03, 2018, 09:29:59 AM
Some information or disinformation about the victim is getting out there that makes her sound bat sh!t crazy.   Not sure how The OSU is going to handle it but it's going to take a while.  Like weeks if not months.  
I suspected someone would bring this up eventually. I touched on it far upthread, as far as the mother (bitch) talking her into staying for money and all that crap. So yes, she stayed and she seems a little "off" on camera, but that doesn't make her "bat shit crazy" or anything close to it.
If she was truly crazy, she would not have gained custody of the children - as in any. So yeah, disinformation for sure.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 03, 2018, 10:10:18 AM
The investigation will take a while. The investigative body Ohio state has in place looks like a good group of individuals. 

The internet rumors on the victim lose weight when they state police stopped responding to 911 calls. That isn’t something that would happen. It’s not a good look for those that spread them.

Honest Buckeye - you raise a number of very fair questions that will need to be answered by the investigative body in the weeks ahead.

The only thing I would question is does it matter if Urban Meyer escalated the issue? A head coach has full hiring / firing authority for his staff. We see those decisions made quickly all the time by coaches. I suppose it may matter as to where Gene Smith and others fit into the accusations as well.

The kids really got screwed in all of this. Kids are resilient, and lucky enough they are young not to understand the public aspect of this, but they have been in the middle of a messy world for their entire life.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 03, 2018, 10:10:50 AM
HB - I'm not sure why you thought I was taking shots or my post was directed at you, but it certainly wasn't. I was more commenting on the segment of fans that are saying this has nothing to do with football so there should be no accountability. I simply don't agree with that. Head coaches, paid millions of dollars, should be the example as they are leaders of men at a time that is often life shaping.

My second point was that Urban has a history of being untruthful. He was untruthful at BG, untruthful at Utah and seems it has been a trend. Ignoring that was where my head in the sand comment originated, but again, not directed at you, moreso at the fans I'm surrounded by that think he walks on water on Sundays, after he wins on Saturdays.

Good to see some familiar faces here. We had our second child in May, which has kept us really busy and eliminated any free time, but we're less than a month away and maybe I'm sneaking in a couple extra bathroom breaks to talk some football. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 03, 2018, 10:15:45 AM
HB - I'm not sure why you thought I was taking shots or my post was directed at you, but it certainly wasn't. I was more commenting on the segment of fans that are saying this has nothing to do with football so there should be no accountability. I simply don't agree with that. Head coaches, paid millions of dollars, should be the example as they are leaders of men at a time that is often life shaping.

My second point was that Urban has a history of being untruthful. He was untruthful at BG, untruthful at Utah and seems it has been a trend. Ignoring that was where my head in the sand comment originated, but again, not directed at you, moreso at the fans I'm surrounded by that think he walks on water on Sundays, after he wins on Saturdays.

Good to see some familiar faces here. We had our second child in May, which has kept us really busy and eliminated any free time, but we're less than a month away and maybe I'm sneaking in a couple extra bathroom breaks to talk some football.
On this we agree.    It has everything to do with football and all coaches at that level bate certsin responsibilities.  If he did not live up to them- and at this point that is how it appears- he needs to be fired.
Great news on your second child!!
It’s great to see you popping in here!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 03, 2018, 10:25:55 AM
This is bizarre.


Pretend you're the victim.  You've been abused by your husband, it's finally out, everyone knows, and the #1 takeaway from it is....his boss' job is at stake!  What the what?!?!?


Umm, hello, how did we get here?!?  This is sensationalist.  A situation occurs that is "newsworthy" - only because in the wide-scope of everyone involved (not UM) and everyone connected to those involved (UM), one of them is famous.



The other 4 or 17 or 92 domestic abuse victims in Columbus or Gainesville or wherever aren't being discussed by anyone.  Hell, THE ACTUAL ABUSER IN THIS INSTANCE ISN'T BEING DISCUSSED.  This is bizarro-world, imo.



Meyer isn't the one to blame, he just happens to be the most famous person connected to the actual people of the case.  This isn't about being PC or not, it's about celebrity worship and sensationalism and tearing down people we, ourselves, have built up.  It's a sickness.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 03, 2018, 10:36:48 AM
I suspected someone would bring this up eventually. I touched on it far upthread, as far as the mother (bitch) talking her into staying for money and all that crap. So yes, she stayed and she seems a little "off" on camera, but that doesn't make her "bat shit crazy" or anything close to it.
If she was truly crazy, she would not have gained custody of the children - as in any. So yeah, disinformation for sure.
I have a huge issue with people calling her out for staying for the money or calling her crazy. When you are a parent, you make decisions in attempts to provide for your children as well as possible. Often the abused stay with an abuser for the betterment of their children, thinking they can handle the abuse so the kids have a better life. 
And yes, maybe she is mentally off. Have you ever known anyone that has gone through abuse? They've been through a ton mentally and sometimes there memory, stories and reasoning don't add up. Remember, they are a victim, not someone deserving of abuse. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 03, 2018, 10:39:08 AM
'Fro,

The abuser isn't being talked about because he's been fired and is not working - probably never will again - unless he grabs a shovel.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 03, 2018, 10:42:48 AM
I have a huge issue with people calling her out for staying for the money or calling her crazy. When you are a parent, you make decisions in attempts to provide for your children as well as possible. Often the abused stay with an abuser for the betterment of their children, thinking they can handle the abuse so the kids have a better life.
And yes, maybe she is mentally off. Have you ever known anyone that has gone through abuse? They've been through a ton mentally and sometimes there memory, stories and reasoning don't add up. Remember, they are a victim, not someone deserving of abuse.
Are you talking to me? I think you are not quite understanding my post, because I 100 percent agree with you. 
What I don't agree with is her mother pressuring her to stay. The woman wanted out, regardless of money, and her mother wouldn't accept that. Shame on her mother for not backing her child's position and desires. Money isn't everything, and had she left the asshole, he'd probably still be working and paying child support anyway.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 03, 2018, 10:44:01 AM
And yes, I've seen people go through abuse (3 women). Never once did I encourage them to stay. It's not worth it and it only gets worse.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 03, 2018, 10:49:18 AM
At the 11 minute mark she also contradicts herself as she sure as shit shared it with Shelley Meyer(pictures,texts).She put financial stability in front of the best interests of her children both emotionally/physically.
I endured years of a horrible marriage because I was scared of the financial implications of divorce. I'm sure my ex endured years of a horrible marriage because she was concerned her free ride would end. In fact, one of the things that precipitated the divorce was when I discovered she was on dating sites, I found messages to her best friend where she was saying she wanted a divorce but she was scared that she couldn't support herself and was terrified about getting a job.
Now, there was no abuse, or anything like that. It was just two people that didn't belong together. But clearly we were both putting financial stability in front of our own emotional health.
Can you imagine Courtney Smith's position? Her husband was making a LOT of money. She was making none. She absolutely didn't want him fired. She was scared of what would happen to her, to her kids, if their income source dried up. People will put themselves through all sorts of horrible things due to fear. For her, things finally boiled up to 2015 when she actually divorced him, and that was probably best for both of them. Not sure how it works in Ohio for child support, but she was probably still getting financial support and didn't have to expose herself to the continued abuse. That should have been the end of it, but he couldn't just walk away. Despite being divorced he allegedly threatened her again while dropping off their kids, which precipitated the protection order and all of this coming out. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 03, 2018, 10:53:40 AM
I endured years of a horrible marriage because I was scared of the financial implications of divorce. I'm sure my ex endured years of a horrible marriage because she was concerned her free ride would end. In fact, one of the things that precipitated the divorce was when I discovered she was on dating sites, I found messages to her best friend where she was saying she wanted a divorce but she was scared that she couldn't support herself and was terrified about getting a job.
Now, there was no abuse, or anything like that. It was just two people that didn't belong together. But clearly we were both putting financial stability in front of our own emotional health.
Can you imagine Courtney Smith's position? Her husband was making a LOT of money. She was making none. She absolutely didn't want him fired. She was scared of what would happen to her, to her kids, if their income source dried up. People will put themselves through all sorts of horrible things due to fear. For her, things finally boiled up to 2015 when she actually divorced him, and that was probably best for both of them. Not sure how it works in Ohio for child support, but she was probably still getting financial support and didn't have to expose herself to the continued abuse. That should have been the end of it, but he couldn't just walk away. Despite being divorced he allegedly threatened her again while dropping off their kids, which precipitated the protection order and all of this coming out.
Again, she wanted out and was talked into staying in.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 11:00:59 AM
Good to see some familiar faces here. We had our second child in May, which has kept us really busy and eliminated any free time, but we're less than a month away and maybe I'm sneaking in a couple extra bathroom breaks to talk some football.
Congrats Mario
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 11:07:46 AM
Again, she wanted out and was talked into staying in.
I'm not sure of anything right now.She also claimed that Earle Bruce supposedly drove down to Fla in 2009 to convince her not to divorce him.I mean really,your grown up sort it out.Conveniently she says all this after Smith is fired and Earle is dead.Is this motivated by her alimony/child support being affected - when she had years to air all this out but comes out now?Beginning to think the only victims here are the children.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 03, 2018, 11:11:02 AM
Are you talking to me? I think you are not quite understanding my post, because I 100 percent agree with you.
What I don't agree with is her mother pressuring her to stay. The woman wanted out, regardless of money, and her mother wouldn't accept that. Shame on her mother for not backing her child's position and desires. Money isn't everything, and had she left the asshole, he'd probably still be working and paying child support anyway.
Poor use of the word "you." I wasn't directing at you, but saying general population using the  word "you." Clearly my forum writing skills need to be polished.  I need to stop by more often.
I agree with the mother situation. Mother's say things that often don't make sense. My mother is one of the nicest ladies in the world, I truly mean that. A week before my first marriage, I went to talk to her and let her know I didn't think I should be getting married and it didn't feel right. Her response was that I couldn't call it off now because it was a destination wedding and our family had vacation time booked. That lady loved me well my entire life, but sometimes parents give absolutely god awful advice. Marriage lasted 14 months, which thankfully led me to finding the amazing woman I get to call my wife. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 11:36:52 AM
Can you imagine Courtney Smith's position? Her husband was making a LOT of money. She was making none. She absolutely didn't want him fired. She was scared of what would happen to her, to her kids, if their income source dried up.
Yes but she quotes Earle Bruce after he's dead.And then she goes guns blazing to McMurphy after the fact.If she kept all those photos and the Police Dept has her calls/reports on record then she has recourse.She needs to sue her ex,seems she's might be dragging tOSU and Urbz maybe for a payday in court.I'm no lover of UFM or Shelly seems like a lot of flip-flopping.If they're guilty let them swing
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 03, 2018, 11:50:46 AM
I'm not sure of anything right now.She also claimed that Earle Bruce supposedly drove down to Fla in 2009 to convince her not to divorce him.I mean really,your grown up sort it out.Conveniently she says all this after Smith is fired and Earle is dead.Is this motivated by her alimony/child support being affected - when she had years to air all this out but comes out now?Beginning to think the only victims here are the children.
A lot....I mean A LOT of adults are not grown-up emotionally.  And that's just the baseline....once they're victims of abuse, then they're REALLY not.  
It's the difference between what should be and what is.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 03, 2018, 11:51:35 AM
'Fro,

The abuser isn't being talked about because he's been fired and is not working - probably never will again - unless he grabs a shovel.
Great, then we can move on.  Oh wait, no we can't - there's a celebrity involved!!!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 03, 2018, 11:56:34 AM
If she was truly crazy, she would not have gained custody of the children - as in any. So yeah, disinformation for sure.
Unfortunately that isn't true.  It's almost impossible for fathers to get anything better than 50/50, and that's a tough feat to pull off, no matter how crazy she is, absent being an actual physical threat to the children.  And considering his history, no matter how crazy she is, she's probably better than he is.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on August 03, 2018, 12:04:17 PM
I'm all for waiting for all the facts, but based on what has been made public, it's really difficult to believe Urban Meyer had zero knowledge of this situation. It's very interesting that some are more prone to rush to the defense of a football coach, asking for him to be protected and less worried about a woman who was clearly beat for a long period of time.

Urban has a history of being a liar. If that can't be acknowledged, there's a lot of heads in the sand.
I am curious why is defending the football coach mean they are not worried about the woman. These things are not mutually exclusive and is used by people all the time to shut down their "opponents". You don't want a tax hike for schools, you must not care about the children, etc. Come on, at least be fair when you criticize. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 03, 2018, 12:15:52 PM
Unfortunately that isn't true.  It's almost impossible for fathers to get anything better than 50/50, and that's a tough feat to pull off, no matter how crazy she is, absent being an actual physical threat to the children.  And considering his history, no matter how crazy she is, she's probably better than he is.
Well, one of my closest friends got sole custody because his wife was nuts. Maybe things are different in Illinois from where you practice.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 03, 2018, 01:07:45 PM
What I don't agree with is her mother pressuring her to stay. The woman wanted out, regardless of money, and her mother wouldn't accept that. Shame on her mother for not backing her child's position and desires. Money isn't everything, and had she left the asshole, he'd probably still be working and paying child support anyway.
She did leave him. Filed for divorce in late 2015 (after this incident), finalized in 2016.
https://247sports.com/Article/Ohio-State-Buckeyes-Urban-Meyer-Timeline-of-alleged-abuse-leading-to-Zach-Smiths-firing-120302532/
2 years later, he threatens her again, comes onto her property against her will [charged with criminal trespass], and this causes there to be a protective order.
Maybe her mom gave bad advice. But a few months later, Courtney made the right decision and left him regardless. 
This would all have gone away, likely forever, if Smith hadn't provoked the situation in May and gotten a protective order placed against him. As you say, he'd still be working and paying child support anyway.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 03, 2018, 01:26:16 PM
Unfortunately that isn't true.  It's almost impossible for fathers to get anything better than 50/50, and that's a tough feat to pull off, no matter how crazy she is, absent being an actual physical threat to the children.  And considering his history, no matter how crazy she is, she's probably better than he is.
Lawyer Friend can confirm this.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 03, 2018, 01:32:45 PM
Is Gene Smith gonna be in trouble? Local Radio reports coming out that Urban reported other incidents concerning Zach and Courtney to Gene & Title 9 Office.

Also several Layers coming out saying since Courtney Smith isn't a student or employee of the University she isn't protected by Title 9. OSU has a seperate Sexual Abuse code of Conduct (Handled by the Title 9 Office) that should be considered.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 03, 2018, 02:06:40 PM
Gene Smith hired Dan McCarney as the head coach at Iowa State with his own domestic abuse arrest when Smith was there, so it wouldn't be out of character for Smith to ignore that red flag.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 02:18:52 PM
As I said up thread Gene could be in deep kimchi
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hoss on August 03, 2018, 02:19:40 PM
I don't know how you make the case that the upper levels of university and athletic department officials at Ohio State weren't aware of this, and haven't been for some time. It was ignored until it couldn't be. 

In that vein, I don't see how they can throw Meyer under the bus for that cause without implicating themselves of the same offense. So we gin-up a whitewash committee for insulation, and to buy time for Trump or a Kardashian to wash this off the front page. 

There will be protests outside the stadium when the season starts, but it appears that support for Meyer in Ohio is very strong. That will outlast the outrage.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 03, 2018, 02:30:50 PM
btw, if every coach on college staffs who have engaged in domestic abuse were to be fired, there'd be hundreds of very thin staffs.....



...bu they're not sexy.  I guarantee you multiple coaches have been dismissed from college fooball jobs in the past calendar year that were underreported or not reported at all.  



The LB coach for Montana Tech isn't sensational enough I guess.   
                              *random example pulled from my butt
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hoss on August 03, 2018, 02:40:23 PM
***PSA***

JMO, but I'd keep the ole prison wallet closed in these threads, given the goings-on at various BIG schools these days. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 03:05:29 PM
She did leave him. Filed for divorce in late 2015 (after this incident), finalized in 2016.
https://247sports.com/Article/Ohio-State-Buckeyes-Urban-Meyer-Timeline-of-alleged-abuse-leading-to-Zach-Smiths-firing-120302532/
2 years later, he threatens her again, comes onto her property against her will [charged with criminal trespass], and this causes there to be a protective order.
Maybe her mom gave bad advice. But a few months later, Courtney made the right decision and left him regardless.
This would all have gone away, likely forever, if Smith hadn't provoked the situation in May and gotten a protective order placed against him. As you say, he'd still be working and paying child support anyway.
Informative post. I didn't know that sequence.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 03, 2018, 03:18:58 PM
As I said up thread Gene could be in deep kimchi
Right. Gene is not making this decision. (Oh) Gee is no longer in Columbus.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 03, 2018, 03:20:40 PM
Informative post. I didn't know that sequence.
There's more to it than just that. It goes back to 2009, when her mother and Urbie's life coach convinced her to stay with the POS.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 03:32:01 PM
Gene Smith hired Dan McCarney as the head coach at Iowa State with his own domestic abuse arrest when Smith was there, so it wouldn't be out of character for Smith to ignore that red flag.
Gene's new boss is rumoredly much more serious than his old one.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 03:37:12 PM
Is Gene Smith gonna be in trouble? Local Radio reports coming out that Urban reported other incidents concerning Zach and Courtney to Gene & Title 9 Office.

Also several Layers coming out saying since Courtney Smith isn't a student or employee of the University she isn't protected by Title 9. OSU has a seperate Sexual Abuse code of Conduct (Handled by the Title 9 Office) that should be considered.
My understanding: 
Courtney isn't protected by Title IX and can't realistically sue OSU even if standard ops weren't followed. But at the same time, Urban was contractually obligated to report DV against her to the Title IX office.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 03, 2018, 03:40:21 PM
I am curious why is defending the football coach mean they are not worried about the woman. These things are not mutually exclusive and is used by people all the time to shut down their "opponents". You don't want a tax hike for schools, you must not care about the children, etc. Come on, at least be fair when you criticize.
So a large segment of the people who are defending UM are also talking about protecting the well being of the woman (aka the victim?)  C'mon man, be realistic.  You're right, they are mutually exclusive, but you're telling me you don't see the segment of people defending meyer and trying to dig up dirt on this woman to smear her name and character? 
I get your analogy with taxes and schools but this is not that. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 03, 2018, 03:45:44 PM
Is Gene Smith gonna be in trouble? Local Radio reports coming out that Urban reported other incidents concerning Zach and Courtney to Gene & Title 9 Office.
I have no idea of the veracity of this information so I do not vouch for it.  I didn't even hear it myself, I'm just quoting @TyphonInc (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=8) .  
That said, if it is true that Urban reported this to Gene and Title 9 office, Urban should be reinstated within a week.  In the long run that might be worse for Ohio State, but it should put Urban in the clear, no?  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 03, 2018, 03:49:44 PM
So a large segment of the people who are defending UM are also talking about protecting the well being of the woman (aka the victim?)  C'mon man, be realistic.  You're right, they are mutually exclusive, but you're telling me you don't see the segment of people defending meyer and trying to dig up dirt on this woman to smear her name and character?
I get your analogy with taxes and schools but this is not that.
First:
Welcome back Mario and congratulations on the new baby!  
Second:
I think the potential "other facts" that HB and others are waiting to see are something along the lines of what @TyphonInc (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=8) stated and I commented on upthread.  Ie, if it turns out the Urban reported this to Gene and/or Title 9 office then it would seem to me that Urban is in the clear and Gene and/or Title 9 office are in trouble.  We'll see.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 03, 2018, 03:49:56 PM
So a large segment of the people who are defending UM are also talking about protecting the well being of the woman (aka the victim?)  C'mon man, be realistic.  You're right, they are mutually exclusive, but you're telling me you don't see the segment of people defending meyer and trying to dig up dirt on this woman to smear her name and character?

well, there's no need to bring the victim's character into the argument regarding Meyer.  The woman was assaulted more than once.  There's enough proof of that.
The defense of Meyer is about what Urban knew and didn't know and what he did or didn't do with that information.
The poor battered woman is no part of that what so ever.
If you're defending the WR coach Smith, then go after his ex-wife.
If you're defending Meyer, then go after Shelly or someone in the administration, such as the AD.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Reyd on August 03, 2018, 03:58:08 PM
Did Urban lie to his bosses and do they want to fire him for that? It's a title IX thing and the feds have to be considered. The rest of the stories are all window dressing.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 03, 2018, 04:01:35 PM
With Urban Meyer having been placed on administrative leave, the Ohio State head coach's future is murky. Now, BetDSI has adjusted its odds regarding who will be permanently in charge of the Buckeyes.

Will Urban Meyer be the head coach of the Ohio State Buckeyes on Sept. 1, 2018?

YES: +180 (wager $100 to win $180)

NO: -220 (wager $220 to win $100)

Considering the severity of Meyer's situation in the aftermath of former Michigan State doctor Larry Nassar and decades-old abuse allegations involving former Ohio State doctor Richard Strauss, it appears unlikely Meyer emerges from this scandal unscathed. Amid the No More and Me Too movements, a majority of students, faculty, boosters and alumni presumably will be calling for Meyer's ouster.

Who will be Ohio State Buckeyes head coach on Sept. 1, 2018?

GREG SCHIANO: -150

URBAN MEYER: +180

KEVIN WILSON: +220

RYAN DAY: +500

ALEX GRINCH: +1500

LES MILES: +5000

JIM GROBE: +10000

RICH RODRIGUEZ: +10000
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 04:35:39 PM
JOHN HARBAUGH :character0029: 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 03, 2018, 04:38:28 PM
That said, if it is true that Urban reported this to Gene and Title 9 office, Urban should be reinstated within a week.  In the long run that might be worse for Ohio State, but it should put Urban in the clear, no?  
If that's the case, why did they put him on administrative leave? 
Money-wise, Urban is INCREDIBLY valuable to the university. Don't you think it would make sense to come out and say "Urban did what he was required to do, and we had failures in our Title IX office that we need to learn how to fix."
That kills the PR cycle. Nobody cares of someone who heads up the Title IX office is scalped over this. Or even OSU's president. They care if the head coach is scalped. 
I realize none of those people above him want to fall on their sword, but if Urban reported this up, don't you think he'd be saying so to protect himself from being thrown under the bus?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 04:42:01 PM
The poor battered woman is no part of that what so ever.

ff this story has lots of tenacles,she didn't press charges for what 7 years.Then didn't want him to get fired either as she had Zack on the line for alimony/child support.Urban finally cans him and he's at fault.I'm sure more will come out.The kids could have used better parenting that is for sure
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 03, 2018, 04:44:12 PM
If that's the case, why did they put him on administrative leave?

Money-wise, Urban is INCREDIBLY valuable to the university. Don't you think it would make sense to come out and say "Urban did what he was required to do, and we had failures in our Title IX office that we need to learn how to fix."

That kills the PR cycle. Nobody cares of someone who heads up the Title IX office is scalped over this. Or even OSU's president. They care if the head coach is scalped.

I realize none of those people above him want to fall on their sword, but if Urban reported this up, don't you think he'd be saying so to protect himself from being thrown under the bus?
If I were Urban Meyer, no I wouldn't be saying anything in public.  I'd be talking to my attorney.  
You make good points.  It makes little sense to put him on administrative leave if he did report but on the other hand putting him on administrative leave bought them time.  
You are right that the Title 9 administrator getting sacked is a MUCH lower profile event than the Head Coach but again, they may have just needed time.  
The other thing is that we (and tOSU) can't be certain that we know everything.  Maybe they are buying time to see if anything else comes out.  
Bottom line, assuming that the report is true, I think they are buying time with the administrative leave and the investigation.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 04:44:39 PM
 if Urban reported this up, don't you think he'd be saying so to protect himself from being thrown under the bus?
Just a hunch but I'm thinking that's what has happened
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 03, 2018, 04:47:30 PM
did Ohio State start fall camp today like the Huskers and some others?

Of do they start later?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 03, 2018, 04:51:21 PM
(https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/38440205_10156612358572020_1734007524371202048_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=2328e8f840e1ea28cd2449d8224b94ff&oe=5C08656B)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 03, 2018, 04:55:39 PM
well, that letter is a positive sign Urban may keep his position
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 03, 2018, 04:57:53 PM
well, that letter is a positive sign Urban may keep his position
Agreed.  I'm not saying I trust it, I don't.  Urban obviously has a self-serving motivation to claim he reported but claiming it in a VERY public way would be beyond stupid if it were not true.  
My new guess is that Urban will be able to substantiate that he reported this to someone and that someone will get sacked and Urban will remain the Head Coach.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 03, 2018, 05:07:01 PM
Did Urban lie to his bosses and do they want to fire him for that? It's a title IX thing and the feds have to be considered. The rest of the stories are all window dressing.
The radio stuff I heard said he reported "other" incidents the Smith's had. But he did not report the 2015 redacted police report one (the one he claims he didn't know about.)
So I can see 2 plausible scenarios coming from that info. 1) He really didn't know about the battering or see the the pics. (Those pics were sent to her parents where they also sent to Shelly?)
Or 2) He defended the POS because reporting a divorce and a restraining order (I'm not sure what exactly was reported) are not fireable offenses but reporting a battering would be. 

The venom coming from C-Bus radio is a lot less than it was yesterday. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 03, 2018, 05:07:20 PM
pretty easy decision to me

Sack someone in the athletic department - pay them off to take the fall

return to business as usual in the football offices
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 05:11:11 PM
Listening to Zach Smith right now
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 05:13:02 PM
Says he never physically abused her.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 05:15:46 PM
Says October 2015 allegations were well known in athletic department.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 05:16:35 PM
Says he was informed of them by Gene Smith (!!!!)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 03, 2018, 05:16:48 PM
Might as well be bragging that he only terrorized her with his words and the threat of violence.  He's a saint!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 05:32:44 PM
So my thoughts are:

- Urbs was entirely too flippant about what he said to the media
- There doesn't appear to be any sort of cover up - Urban wasn't hiding allegations of domestic violence
- Whether he should have been fired earlier is dicey - on one hand obviously yes!  OTOH if everything is reported to the school and to the police, and everyone signs off that everything is ok, why not keep him?

Remaining questions
- What did Urbs and Shelley talk about?
- What did athletic department do about this?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: mcwterps1 on August 03, 2018, 05:43:38 PM
Though it’s objectively good to be nice to people – or at the very least to not be actively offensive – political correctness will never be a practical... 
Man, this thing is moving fast. 
Just wanted to agree with you a bit here, and I believe that being "PC" can be taken too far.
I think I left of center, but the right is so far right I look liberal, but that's another area.
Sorry for the side track, but really, the only thing affecting me about this debate, is what recruiting will be like after.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 03, 2018, 05:44:28 PM
Says he never physically abused her.
never?  Not even in 2009?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 05:48:44 PM
never?  Not even in 2009?
He characterized everything as "restraining" her 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 05:53:52 PM
It is a complicated statement. If true, then he reported it. But also if true, he lied in his presser ... and kept employing Smith beyond 2015 anyway, ostensibly because it wasn't public yet, so no big deal.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 05:57:47 PM
Man, this thing is moving fast.
Just wanted to agree with you a bit here, and I believe that being "PC" can be taken too far.
I think I left of center, but the right is so far right I look liberal, but that's another area.
Sorry for the side track, but really, the only thing affecting me about this debate, is what recruiting will be like after.
I'm with you there. Also: a little agreeable sidetrack here is probably healthy. Keeps us calm and thoughtful.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 06:00:09 PM
So my thoughts are:

- Urbs was entirely too flippant about what he said to the media
- There doesn't appear to be any sort of cover up - Urban wasn't hiding allegations of domestic violence
- Whether he should have been fired earlier is dicey - on one hand obviously yes!  OTOH if everything is reported to the school and to the police, and everyone signs off that everything is ok, why not keep him?

Remaining questions
- What did Urbs and Shelley talk about?
- What did athletic department do about this?
If not fireable then, why fireable now? The only aspect that changed was publicity.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 03, 2018, 06:01:42 PM
It is a complicated statement. If true, then he reported it. But also if true, he lied in his presser ... and kept employing Smith beyond 2015 anyway, ostensibly because it wasn't public yet, so no big deal.
Well summed up. The part that rubs me the wrong way is he blatantly lied in the presser and kind of shrugging it off by talking his principles and his parents.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 06:03:32 PM
If not fireable then, why fireable now? The only aspect that changed was publicity.
Urbs already said publicity was a reason he was fired.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 03, 2018, 06:03:38 PM
It is a complicated statement. If true, then he reported it. But also if true, he lied in his presser ... and kept employing Smith beyond 2015 anyway, ostensibly because it wasn't public yet, so no big deal.
If he reported it, IMHO he's in the clear. 
Even for continuing to employ Smith, because I'm sure if he reported it, the HR and Title IX folks would probably have had to spend some time reviewing it. And once Courtney filed for divorce [a month after the Oct 2015 incident] and they were truly separated, maybe they said "well the problem will be moot because they are no longer together." So bygones are bygones, there were no charges filed, and they're not together so the risk is now mitigated. Until he blew the whole thing up this May. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 03, 2018, 06:05:01 PM
If not fireable then, why fireable now? The only aspect that changed was publicity.
Not true. May 2018, after the divorce was final for almost 2 years, he gets charged for criminal trespass and she takes out the restraining order. That was new information this summer, and suggested that he couldn't even be divorced without abusing her. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 03, 2018, 06:05:58 PM
Per Zach Smith, Urbs said "If I find out you hit her, I swear to God you're done. You're fired."
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 03, 2018, 06:09:14 PM
I could see new President just saying screw it all, and saying you’re fired to a number of individuals. Especially with the wrestling scandal also on his lap.

Urban reported it up. But he still lied to the media and kept an abuser on staff. In the work of big time college football Head Coaches fire assistant coaches for looking the wrong way. He didn’t need a reason. He could have fired Zach for his idiocy on twitter and calling out other coaches like the Huskers assistant. But he kept him. Fireable for Urban?? Maybe not; but it still looks AWFUL. He is now stating he knew it all, but kept him.

Gene is a goner. 

This thing was really well managed by Ohio State for 48 hours with the paid leave and clear and decisive statements, as well as the well constructed investigative body.

Now it’s the Wild West with individuals running to their PR corners and going into full blown personal CYA mode. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 03, 2018, 06:19:34 PM
On top of all this McMurpjy is now dropping new text strands between Zach smith and the ex, where he admits strangling her. 

He said he was sitting on a bunch more info and now he might play his next hand. 

This is moving VERY fast
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: CatsbyAZ on August 03, 2018, 06:21:12 PM
did Ohio State start fall camp today like the Huskers and some others?

Of do they start later?
Yes, today, as planned. What wasn’t originally planned was the practice being closed to the media & fans. What could’ve prompted that sudden change?
In other news, sports radio came around to speculating a Meyer replacement. Two names came up: Hiring Matt Campbell from Iowa State & convincing Bob Stoops to come out of short lived retirement.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 06:22:59 PM
Urbs already said publicity was a reason he was fired.
I know. My goal with that comment was to express something incongruous. 
Either one behaves so purely out of principle that he can brag about it as a mainstay ... or one can sometimes maintain the employment of a subordinate because he's good enough to 100% deserve it except until incorrect bad publicity arises and that subordinate gets dumped to the wolves even though he did deserve the job and didn't deserve the character defaming at all.
It's too incongruent to believe. It's more straightforward to believe that Smith was a dick but kept his job because the public hadn't yet fathomed his the true extent of his dickishness.
I have to admit it's too soon to conclude my suspicion for sure. But it's waaaaay-upon-WAY to soon to conclude Meyer's word choice about why Smith stayed on staff. That one aspect of his statement was a have cake/eat it too moment.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 06:24:52 PM
Not true. May 2018, after the divorce was final for almost 2 years, he gets charged for criminal trespass and she takes out the restraining order. That was new information this summer, and suggested that he couldn't even be divorced without abusing her.
A very good point. But unless I missed it, that isn't the point Meyer made.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 03, 2018, 06:25:06 PM
I could see new President just saying screw it all, and saying you’re fired to a number of individuals. Especially with the wrestling scandal also on his lap.

Urban reported it up. But he still lied to the media and kept an abuser on staff. In the work of big time college football Head Coaches fire assistant coaches for looking the wrong way. He didn’t need a reason. He could have fired Zach for his idiocy on twitter and calling out other coaches like the Huskers assistant. But he kept him. Fireable for Urban?? Maybe not; but it still looks AWFUL. He is now stating he knew it all, but kept him.

Gene is a goner.

This thing was really well managed by Ohio State for 48 hours with the paid leave and clear and decisive statements, as well as the well constructed investigative body.

Now it’s the Wild West with individuals running to their PR corners and going into full blown personal CYA mode.
He is saying that he told Zack that if I find out you did hitter you’re gone. I’m not sure what the final resolution is or should be but on a personal level I am happy to know that he did not hide it from the University or try to cover it up. Not being honest with the media I’m almost willing to give him bonus points for that since that is not necessarily a bad thing in my eyes
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 03, 2018, 06:27:35 PM
In any event, I think Meyer is in keepable shape now. OTOH, I feel like Gene is ... kind of effed.

Also: is there any way to change a setting so a post can go through automatically even if others have posted in the interim. That's very rarely of concern to me
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 06:46:29 PM
Per Zach Smith, Urbs said "If I find out you hit her, I swear to God you're done. You're fired."
Yup that's exactly what Smith said,pretty straight forward.Went on to say it was a domestic dispute and URBZ is a football coach not a police investigator - something along those lines
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 06:48:23 PM
In any event, I think Meyer is in keepable shape now. OTOH, I feel like Gene is ... kind of effed.
That wouldn't surprise me at all
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 03, 2018, 09:08:46 PM
Yup that's exactly what Smith said,pretty straight forward.Went on to say it was a domestic dispute and URBZ is a football coach not a police investigator - something along those lines
yeah except Brett McMurphy released text chains right after Zach Smith's interview with ESPN and a radio interview he did with a Columbus radio station aired that pretty much contradicts everything Smith claims where he apologizes for abusing her.

Brett McMurphy‏Verified account @Brett_McMurphy (https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy) 3h3 hours ago (https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/status/1025500090578939904)


Zach Smith told @1057TheZone (https://twitter.com/1057TheZone) he never abused Courtney. Here is text message b/w Zach & Courtney when he admits & apologizes for strangling his wife on Punta Cana trip in March 2015 & again in April

(https://image.ibb.co/c5deae/Djt_Ni_Sl_Xs_AEp9_WN_jpg_large.jpg)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 03, 2018, 09:10:47 PM
The “just stay away” is something UM should text Zach as well. I don’t think his support for Urban helps right now.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 03, 2018, 09:14:24 PM
The “just stay away” is something UM should text Zach as well. I don’t think his support for Urban helps right now.
there is just too much damning evidence in these text chains for me to believe a word Smith or Urban says. Unless they are completely faked or photoshopped- which I doubt- considering McMurphy is a solid reporter and would get his ass handed to him in lawsuits if they were faked.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 03, 2018, 09:28:48 PM
The rest of the country should probably wait for your unrivaled intelligence to comment on the toxic relationship before our less evolved collective cognitive ability  once more leads us to jump to unreasonable conclusions & make stupendously absurd comments.

What was tOSU supposed to do?  Seriously?  Sealed records and a spouse who wouldn't press charges.  Come on man. They fired Smith as soon as they should have.
Meyer should've fired him the second Shelley Meyer told him what was going on. In all honesty he never should've hired him in the first place because he is a terrible WR's coach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Kris61 on August 03, 2018, 09:42:19 PM
Per Zach Smith, Urbs said "If I find out you hit her, I swear to God you're done. You're fired."
I don’t believe that.  Meyer’s wife had pictures of the injuries. Urby knew he was hitting her.  Smith is trying to fall on the sword for a guy who gave him the biggest break of his life.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 03, 2018, 09:52:25 PM
I don’t believe that.  Meyer’s wife had pictures of the injuries. Urby knew he was hitting her.  Smith is trying to fall on the sword for a guy who gave him the biggest break of his life.
Agreed. Aren’t there also texts that Shelley sends that say urban doesn’t know what to do? Not really a response of someone passionate about defending a beaten woman.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 09:54:55 PM
She clearly didn't want him fired was it a bad marriage - sure it was.She obviously didn't feel threatened enough to move on from the financial situation.You can't read these rags written by rubes and accept them as gospel fact.But Smith was right about one thing Meyer is not an investigator and was warned by him.Why did she wait if it was so traumatic?She was willing to take the coin and deal with the BS.And one thing Smith could do was recruit - that's why he was kept around.Hell every day the media slanders people and ruins reps but somehow thinks they are entitled to unfettered facts while intruding on peoples personal lives.Meyer obviously should have prepared himself for some slippery insights during media days and tripped over his own tongue.I'm far from his staunchest supporter but way too many malletheads were grabbing pitchforks,shovels and torches before ink had even dried on the story

If it's such a cut and dried case she should have lawyered up 3 years ago and cleaned up in a court of law instead of popular opinion.He could be a vacant brute with out a moral compass or she could be angling for an out of court settlement.I really hope this whole thing goes to court - football be damned.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 03, 2018, 10:06:14 PM
When the alternative is being attacked the way she has the last few days, with an unemployed (no family income) ex husband raising her kids by herself in grandpa coaching legends football rabid town you can’t see how she might try to ride it out??? Especially with all the research and what we know about other domestic abuse victims.

The first 20 something comments on the photos posted on McMurphy’s Facebook page couldn’t have been more vile in how they attacked her.   She “used ketchup, nail polish, hit herself.” On top of the despicable names they called her.

It’s hard not to see why she would have tried to ride this out for a decade or so. If this was some grand conspiracy, it would be the most patient and lengthy maneuver ever.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 10:15:05 PM
again why wait so long unless there are other motives that she may not wish to share or air out.Should have came out guns blazing at the time of trauma.Why did she have police/court records sealed?That's bullshit if you make room for one sides excuse then you better make room on the couch for the others.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 03, 2018, 10:21:22 PM
Meyer should've fired him the second Shelley Meyer told him what was going on. In all honesty he never should've hired him in the first place because he is a terrible WR's coach.
Amen to the never hiring part!
Here is where I am confused and have questions:
The way urban worded his presser at big 10 media days, if you listen carefully was very strange.
Specifically he said I got a text the other night about the 2015 incident and we looked at that and there was nothing there
He didn’t say I’m not aware of it or never did he say I am not aware of other things
So I was wondering since Courtney Smith openly acknowledged that she did not reveal that the abuse was physical, because were she was embarrassed, what was Myers wife telling him if anything. Combine that with the fact that it seems like the incident in 15 was relayed from the Powell police to Gene Smith and that is actually how Meyer found out about it. He did make some phone calls and according to the Powell police there was No arrest-  and even Smith‘s name was redacted from the report so therefore, in addition to Zack Smith convincing him that there was nothing to it he probably didn’t think all that much of it    The text he got recently probably said there was an arrest and that’s probably what he meant by there was nothing there.
Either way, I don’t buy that Smith did not hit her. And at the very least Meyer is guilty of giving him way too many chances    
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Kris61 on August 03, 2018, 10:23:47 PM
She clearly didn't want him fired was it a bad marriage - sure it was.She obviously didn't feel threatened enough to move on from the financial situation.You can't read these rags written by rubes and accept them as gospel fact.But Smith was right about one thing Meyer is not an investigator and was warned by him.Why did she wait if it was so traumatic?She was willing to take the coin and deal with the BS.And one thing Smith could do was recruit - that's why he was kept around.Hell every day the media slanders people and ruins reps but somehow thinks they are entitled to unfettered facts while intruding on peoples personal lives.Meyer obviously should have prepared himself for some slippery insights during media days and tripped over his own tongue.I'm far from his staunchest supporter but way too many malletheads were grabbing pitchforks,shovels and torches before ink had even dried on the story
Look, I kinda feel bad for Meyer here.  And before anyone jumps on me, yes, I feel worse for Courtney Smith so save your shock and horror.
I really doubt he was trying to do anything but mind his own business and let two adults work out their own problems. He may have even thought that whatever problems they were having would be exacerbated by Smith losing a lucrative job. But I’m coming at it from a “regular guy” angle and Meyer isn’t a regular guy on a regular job. We’ll see if he can wordsmith his way out of this.  I think he got caught telling a lie about a very touchy subject and to some it appears he was enabling a wife beater.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 03, 2018, 10:24:10 PM
again why wait so long unless there are other motives that she may not wish to share or air out.Should have came out guns blazing at the time of trauma.Why did she have police/court records sealed?That's bullshit if you make room for one sides excuse then you better make room on the couch for the others.
she was still married at the time and he was the sole income earner for the family. An income that was north of $400,000 a year. That's a lot of money living in Ohio. Won't get ya far in South Florida or LA or NYC, but you can live really comfy in a nice ole big house with an affordable mortgage in Ohio. Could get a fricken mansion for $850,000 there- $850k will buy you a shoebox in SoFLa, LA, or NYC.
Not that hard to see why she'd stay around and protect his job. She finally had enough and left him. And NONE of this would have come out and he'd probably still be the WR's coach had the idiot just stop harassing her and violating the protective order she had put out against him.
It's literally all that f'in morons fault. He just stays away he's never arrested few weeks back, he never gets fired, and none of this ever comes out.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 10:32:57 PM
If the weight of evidence is so overwhelming she should have went for the jugular right there.Financially every divorce I've seen has favored the women/children and rightfully so in most cases.Unless the guy can prove otherwise.Courtney doesn't walk away with empty pockets far from it
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 03, 2018, 10:36:10 PM
Look, I kinda feel bad for Meyer here.  And before anyone jumps on me, yes, I feel worse for Courtney Smith so save your shock and horror.
I'll save the shock and horror - you can save the your Jesus and I'm jack the Ripper take.Your right about one thing Meyer wanted them to settle their own problems.Hope it goes to court
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 03, 2018, 10:39:12 PM
pretty crazy article explaining how ESPN is still paying Brett McMurphy- a guy they laid off. Long story short he had 18 months left on his contract when ESPN fired him. He offered to keep doing work at ESPN as long as they paid him as a sort of freelancer but ESPN declined. ESPN figured he'd just take another job and then the remainder of his salary would be off their books. He says he talked to a lawyer, and as long as he didn't take a job at Fox Sports or CBS Sports or do 3rd party work- then ESPN would have to pay him for those 18 months he was under contract. So the guy turned down job offers and went to his Facebook account and started breaking the biggest CFB stories of the last year since being fired. From Scott Frost being hired, to Joe Moorehead at Miss State, to this Ohio State saga with Zach Smith. On his Facebook page. And ESPN is still paying him the rest of his contract.

Pretty incredible story if you ask me.

https://deadspin.com/how-espn-ended-up-paying-brett-mcmurphy-to-post-the-yea-1828089258
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 03, 2018, 11:04:41 PM
Yeah, I'm not really sure what they are doing over there.  They fired most of their actual reporters and kept the blowhards and the cheap newbies.  Which is fine, but don't keep trying to report without reporters.

Then they threw a bunch of money at that Get Up show which anyone could have told you was going to fail miserably.

They just need to show live sports and cut corners everywhere else, people who like sports might have it on by chance if nothing is on, but nothing they put on save MAYBE Gameday is appointment viewing anymore.  We don't need you for our highlights and we've had enough hot takes.

The studio coverage that the league networks provide are SO much better, and granted they know their audience. ESPN keeps trying to cast a wide net and it's not going to work.  I think the NFL Network morning show accidentally does a better job doing what I think Get Up is trying to do.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 04, 2018, 09:24:08 AM
I’m still hping the facts vindicate Meyer.  I want Michigan to beat his rear over and over to trash his perfect record.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 04, 2018, 01:22:59 PM
pretty easy decision to me

Sack someone in the athletic department - pay them off to take the fall

return to business as usual in the football offices”

Man, sports are gross sometimes
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 04, 2018, 02:12:53 PM
I dunno man - it all seems pretty random what catches fire and what doesn't.  I was thinking of Mike Tirico, who faced various accounts of stalking and groping people.  What's he up to?  Oh, calling NBC's football games and the Olympics, because he is a "changed man."

Greg Oden was a student manager for the basketball team, despite being convicted of punching his ex-girlfriend in the face.  No one seemed to care then, or now.  

Tom Cable has been bouncing around the NFL forever despite all sorts of accusations of punching women (and dudes).  

¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 04, 2018, 09:51:13 PM
If the weight of evidence is so overwhelming she should have went for the jugular right there.Financially every divorce I've seen has favored the women/children and rightfully so in most cases.Unless the guy can prove otherwise.Courtney doesn't walk away with empty pockets far from it
Victims of abuse rarely act this way because of what they’ve gone through mentally and emotionally. I’m not saying this is definitely the case, but I’ve heard way too many arguments lately about how victims of abuse should have done more.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 04, 2018, 10:27:54 PM
Nubbz, you're talking about what you or I would consider common sense, but we're not domestic abuse victims, man.  Everything you've said about what she should've done or could've done has been prudent, but not for someone in her shoes.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 04, 2018, 11:39:49 PM
Powell police refusing to release the 2015 police report involving Zach Smith.

http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180803/powell-police-refuse-to-release-report-involving-zach-smith

Quote
Powell police are refusing to release records of a 2015 incident in which Zach Smith’s then-wife (http://www.dispatch.com/sports/20180724/ohio-state-football--powell-police-called-to-home-of-wife-of-fired-assistant-coach-twice-in-2015) accused him of assaulting her. Public-records experts say those files should be open to the public under Ohio law.
Quote
However,the cover pages of the report taken Oct. 26, (http://www.dispatch.com/sports/20180724/ohio-state-football--powell-police-called-to-home-of-wife-of-fired-assistant-coach-twice-in-2015) which were released, note injuries to Smith’s wife, and that a kitchen knife, broken iPhone and two small USB drives were taken as evidence from Courtney Smith’s home.
Quote
Open-records experts argue that unless a case is being “actively investigated” it is considered closed, and that Mr. Smith already has been identified by city officials through other public records and in media reports.
“If they (police) haven’t done anything in a couple of years, then they should release the case file,” said Dennis Hetzel, executive director of the Ohio News Media Association. “It’s obvious who the uncharged suspect is. I think it’s kind of disingenuous on their part to withhold it.”
Quote
The city maintains the suspect “was investigated and believed to have committed an offense, but was not charged/arrested,” according to Megan Canavan, city spokeswoman.
Delaware County Prosecutor Carol O’Brien said she didn’t know why misdemeanor assault or other charges weren’t filed. She said she was disturbed by recent news accounts that Mrs. Smith might have been urged to drop charges at the time or to back off the allegations.
“It bothers me whenever a victim can be manipulated by anyone,” said O’Brien. “Any time you have a power imbalance — and yes, it’s often a woman — it bothers me tremendously.”


Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 04, 2018, 11:49:28 PM
Ramzy Narsallah who runs Buckeye site 11Warriors saying on twitter that Zach Smith was an alcoholic who was late to his own WR group meetings and Urban knew these things yet still kept him around. Honestly blows my mind this shithead had a job with Meyer for almost a decade.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 05, 2018, 09:15:48 AM
Ramzy is taking bath for his twitter comment "Literally everybody knew. I knew. I wrote around it for six years."

I find it awkward that fired, POS Zach Smith is defending Urban.

I also poor that Shelley seemed to be the biggest "big player supporter" of Courtney getting help/leaving (we don't get to see the minutia, maybe others supported her better.) But Courtney speaks out agsint her for not helping her more.

I haven't been a Gene Smith fan since the Tressel debacle. If as reports are coming out that he got the police report, informed Meyer, called Zach off a recruiting trip to talk to him, but no action came out of it....
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 05, 2018, 10:36:09 AM
MDoT - a lot of this is being said thru social media - I couldn't access the Dispatch article.No charges filed. the police did NOT arrest Smith.What is Meyer/School supposed to fire him for? No Doubt Zach Smith Probably did most of this,the problem arises when Courtney - if she had all the evidence you're caterwauling about - wanted it both ways.She laid the onus of their toxic relationship ay Urbans feet as she still wanted Zach's alimony.She had the police reports sealed for what reason?She didn't come forward until Zach got sacked.We are not talking poor people here they've had an income for quite some time that would allow for a comfortable separation.Also McMurphy admitted Courtney wanted money for the interview but says he didn't pony up.We've ascertained what Courtney is now they're just haggling at her price.As I said 1st off the children are the only victims here.I really,really hope this goes to court,there are cards not being shown.

https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/94915/breaking-down-urban-meyers-statement-zach-smiths-radio-appearance
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 05, 2018, 10:50:18 AM
It’s not incredibly surprising the victim didn’t want the only income provider for the family and children to lose his job, yet wanted to find safety away from the abuse. I don’t think that automatically makes her a money chaser.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 05, 2018, 10:56:06 AM
Honest question then if the circumstances were that dire why subject the children to it for how many years.Again I'm not cheering for Zach,Urban or tOSU but she had recourse and apparently didn't choose appropriately.If anybody in C-Bus is that tainted then drain the swamp.The big fly in the ointment for Buckeye fans is Urban fudging the facts at Media Days.Even if he is 100% forthcoming after that.Not certain but IMO I think Gene Smith has a lot of stink attached to himself here
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 05, 2018, 11:20:44 AM
To very public, powerful people, appearances can be important. When your husband works for one of the best football coaches in history and even your parents are telling you to keep quiet and stay, it’s probably not easy to leave. Add on that the emotional state of being abused and a lot of it can be understood.

Now don’t get me wrong, I don’t think this woman is Mother Theresa. She clearly has issues as well, but it’s tough to determine if that’s due to abuse or she’s a nut job. Maybe both?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 05, 2018, 11:30:54 AM
Good Post .Again if Gene Smith & UFM have to be taken out with the rubbish this week - so be it.Because of what happened to Tressel I gotta think Urbz reported this up and washed his hands of it - not wanting to make a bad situation worse for former friends - The Smiths

I stole this from another poster but sort of agree

I understand that people want to vilify Meyer for not telling the truth to the media last week, but he’s not under any obligation to tell the media anything. What he told the school is what mattered. Media isn’t owed anything.

Meyer didn't cover this up but he also wasn't going to put the Smith's personal life on full display for the media it raises the question, why did she have the records sealed then? She sealed them so he wouldn't lose his job by them going public but now says he should have been fired.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 05, 2018, 11:41:02 AM
This situation mostly increases my disdain for the "sports media" these days, not that it had much lower to go in my view.

Before many key facts were available, many were already calling for his scalp.  It was obvious we didn't, and still don't, have all the facts.  Why not outline what is known and steer clear of the editorializing I've seen so many places?

Yes, it's August, and a slow period for sports news, but many of these calls for his head I find very "premature" and immature.

I'll have an opinion when the facts, most of them at least, are in the public domain.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 05, 2018, 12:04:12 PM
It's the only time that I can recall myself feeling even slightly sympathetic for UFM
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 05, 2018, 12:09:19 PM
Whenever I see people besiege "the media," I'm reminded we are a people that always want things to be easy. "The media" is not a thing, other than a vague idea we can feel distain for. Was the whole of sports media, in unison calling for the man's head? I don't think so. There was some, to be sure. There was a lot of wondering if it would topple him. We often see the wondering as something far more because it is our nature to react with wild swings. There's 11 fraught pages here. Even folks waiting for the facts to come out are hardly sanguine. They're often aggressive in their own ways.'

There's something that feels right about pointing out that Meyer doesn't owe "the media" and explanation. Who are these people, other than those who inform the public at large? And who is he, other than the one of the highest paid public employees in the country, who gave a $400,000 job to a man who was apparently having issues with sobriety, doing his job well and occasionally getting the cops called on him by a woman with bruises. In some ways, Urban owes his vast fortune and powerful position to "the media." Without such an arm, college football lacks the conduit to become a national money-making machine. 

As for the facts coming out, it is fair to wait, as long as one also acknowledges there's a high chance most of this won't get public (and almost no chance without that dreaded "media"). Chances are, we'll know something but far from everything. We'll see what the school does, and put faith or doubt in institutions from there. It's odd, the biggest "fact" that will happen rests in the hands of Gene Smith and his bosses. And then some people will go back to trusting the man, others will lob this at him out of spite, and in truth, we should probably be a hint more skeptical after this than before, which is to say we should be plenty skeptical already. 

(Someone above mentioned Ramzy taking a bath over not reporting Smith was a "S@!$@Lord, despite the sense he was. The thing is, most fans don't want rocks thrown at heroes. Most coaches are by nature not nice people. They are usually ultra-competitive absentee fathers and husbands who are masters are turning on charms to get what they want. The often unwind in massive ways, befitting a high-stress job. There are plenty of players who are not on the up and up, many more than you'd think. And while those things might be true, they're not things that in our hearts we'd like to know)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 05, 2018, 12:15:01 PM
Some of the immediate calls for Meyer's head when almost nothing was verified I found very distasteful, and I'm not a Meyer or Ohio State fan.  Folks just rushed to pile on, without facts.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 05, 2018, 12:16:12 PM
I should also add, our reaction to media leans toward the edges because for whatever reason, we're drawn to things that confirm our opinions/excite us or to things that make us angry. Probably more to the latter than the former. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 05, 2018, 12:22:13 PM
I have no dog in this thing at all.  I am merely commenting on how many sites had folks calling for his head when almost nothing was known, and what was "known" was unverified.

And yes, we as consumers cause this, it's what we want, and they (the media) pander to it to garner clicks.

An unsensational "just the facts" site would not get much attention.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 05, 2018, 12:27:30 PM
It's usually the mass viewership not mass media that drives football salaries.If TV's are turned off funds dry up.Commentary on such is window dressing and a pittance in comparison.Just look how readership around forums drops in the off season
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 05, 2018, 12:34:50 PM
Exactly - which makes nearly all criticisms of the media or news or online comments, etc should simply be criticisms into a mirror.  

We the people are the unhinged, quick-to-attack problem.  We are the absurd comments section.  We're taken advantage of by advertisers, pollsters, and such because we allow ourselves to be.  Prudence isn't popular.  Validity is largely irrelevant - it's now a matter of who can persuade the most mouth-breathers in the shortest amount of time.  Who can sway the approval of the mindless masses.

God bless 'murica.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 05, 2018, 12:36:34 PM
For someone that has disdain for UM, I’ll admittedly say I was more on the side of take him down on the onset.

My position wasn’t solely formed from one incident, but years of seeing a dishonest man masquerade around as a moral example of integrity. I’m willing to guess many calling for his head weren’t do so from one incident, but from what they’ve witnessed over a career. Certainly there are capitalists pouring on for self interest, but also man the former cannot be ignored.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 05, 2018, 12:37:23 PM
Correct, and media is more than just the bombastic commentary. Much, much more. It’s an economic engine, a service industry, many companies that aim to provide for consumers. 

So we’re mad not at “the media,” but at the smaller things we’re mad at, which we then project onto some larger canvas. And then we must ask, why would I let a person I dislike, don’t know, don’t have to read affect my mood and outlook at all?

(Mass media does have plenty of issues, just far more esoteric ones. Perhaps that’s not such a leap from universities and football teams to be honest)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 05, 2018, 02:15:03 PM
Well, I have disdain for much of sports media outside showing actual events.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 05, 2018, 02:19:50 PM
It's our own fault, they've responded to ratings.  Skip Bayless was an award winning journalost at one point, who saw what it took in the business to get paid.  He knows people hate him.  He's the king of awful hot takes.  But he's laughing all the way to the bank, while Sports Reporters isn't on anymore.  It's a business, and good sports journalism seems to be bad business, and that's our fault.  Our clicks and our eyeballs tell ESPN what to air, and we told them to scrap real sports journalism in favor of hot takes and sensationalism.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 05, 2018, 02:29:42 PM
I think the "feedback" loop is amplified versus "back in the day".  Media outlets now get almost immediate feedback on items in terms of how much attention it garners.  They learn to emphasize stories that generate clicks.  Back in the day, they had to wait for ratings to come out later and covering the whole week.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 05, 2018, 06:22:40 PM
To ELA who do you know who actually watches Skip Clueless or Stephen A,really I know of no one who would reference them.And I don't think Skip Clueless is an act,I'd see him pout and scream when some one was working him and he knew it.Sounded like some one was taking an air hammer to his backside.How this misguided skragg pulls in that kind of coin really gives pause to questioning the big picture,SMDH
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 05, 2018, 08:41:08 PM
Bad look in Columbus. Defenders are saying don’t jump to a conclusion because we don’t have all the facts yet... then go start an online petition and plan a rally to save Meyers job, essentially saying waiting for the facts doesn’t matter. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 05, 2018, 10:55:24 PM
So we're at a point where we can say this. We want to wait for the facts to come out. We can probably also agree it's not a great imposition that Mr. Meyer be on leave until the facts come out. He remains absurdly well compensated. His overstressed employees probably have a bit more stress. The Ohio State football machine is hurt, but in the grand scheme of the real world, no big deal. 

OSU came out today and said the investigation will go 14 days. Interestingly, the school said it will share the results. That might be very good or VERY bad, assuming the school is honest. It seems the school seems to feel it owes the public more than its coach did. I'll be interested to see how that falls.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Big Beef Tacosupreme on August 05, 2018, 11:44:30 PM
Just don't get Louis Freeh to do it....EEEESH.

Sorry, having a PTSD moment...

Also, my condolences to the OSU fans.  I don't think OSU is getting a fair shake in the media right now.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 05, 2018, 11:57:55 PM
Meyer survived the knee-jerk reaction of the planet....he'll keep his job.  It's stupid that the initial reaction is the danger moment...the eventual revealing of the evidence should be.  


We're so backwards as a society.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 06, 2018, 06:51:05 AM
Mary Jo White to lead the investigation. She Ezekiel Elliott cas for the NFL, Jerry Richardson case and the New Orleans Saints' "Bountygate" scandal. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 06, 2018, 08:06:23 AM
I wouldn't go to a Meyer rally either (even if I were a fan).  The facts COULD be rather bad here.

Putting him on paid leave is very appropriate.  Fourteen days sounds like it's long enough (to me).

My guess is they make him throw three Hail Marys in the first game and donate money to some cause.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 08:43:55 AM
Good to see Big Beef - you said tOSU fans aren't getting a fair shake.Ya know something tOSU isn't getting their money's worth from Urban Frank Meyer.I've always felt he was arrogant and condescending.More so than most HC's in his position.He preaches a whole slew of virtues that seem to escape his grasp.Be prepared he blathers on well what the +@!$#&% was he thinking two weeks back - and I'm not speaking in hindsight either.Is he that full of himself that he didn't think the yapping jackels in the rumor rags weren't going to ask him about a recently dismissed member of his staff because of domestic violence/tresspassing charges?Even if he followed protocol/procedure - which I think he did BTW he definitely sullied any good intentions/rep on the part of the Program/University - IDIOT
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 09:09:36 AM
This from 11 Warriors - pretty interesting

https://www.elevenwarriors.com/forum/site-stuff/2018/08/95003/how-we-handled-documents-related-to-zach-smiths-past
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 09:34:57 AM
please don't include me as this part of society or the consumer of the money grubbing media

I try hard not to and most here on this fan site are here because we''re not part of the masses and refuse to be sucked down to that level
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 06, 2018, 10:08:19 AM
I agree, I doubt anyone posting here has much regard for the opinions of Talking Heads in general.

We get far better analysis around here, I think, and have always thought.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 10:09:32 AM
My apologies if this was already posted (I haven't been able to fully keep up with this story and thread the last few days):
It's from Brett McMurphy's Facebook page (since he can't traditionally publish because of ESPN's noncompete clause). He interviewed several ADs. 
One might argue their perspective is a lot more relevant to the outcome than ours:
I contacted about two dozen current FBS athletic directors, asking for their opinion on the situation at Ohio State. Here are some of the responses. All of the ADs were told they would not be identified.
AD 1: “In today’s landscape, the (Ohio State) president is scared shitless. The presidents and ADs were fired at Penn State and Baylor. When the president decides this starts going downhill and lies can be proven, then everyone will run for the hills. They can’t let it get out of hand because then you don’t know where it goes. If Ohio State can fire Woody Hayes and Jim Tressel, it can fire Urban Meyer.”
AD 2: “I’m sure they’d love to keep him, but they have to first protect the university.”
AD 3: “It looks like a smart move in this case to provide a layer of objectivity and separation regardless of the outcome.”
AD 4: “No, there’s no way you can keep him. Believe me, they’re trying to see how far and wide people knew – who knew what and when did they know. If they keep him, the onslaught will never end.”
AD 5: “I think they will keep him if they can’t 100 percent fire with cause, because they don’t want to pay him.”
AD 6: “I think they are trying to get a clear understanding of all the facts before determining the next steps.”
AD 7: “There are many considerations/consequences and possible legal challenges to various aspects of the decision they could make. They will want to know all of that before conclusion. Ione would have to believe their goal is total integrity/credibility in final analysis, not popularity. They will want to stand strong behind whatever decision they reach.”
AD 8: “I think they want to cover for whatever decision they come up with. The three board members and three outsiders gives good balance and is a defensible position on the outcome.”
AD 9: “I believe they are trying to get to an objective truth and set of facts. It will take quite a bit of time and discovery (phone records, emails, documents from lots of people and sources etc.) to get to a point that he institution and board feels that they have a case for a solid and defensible decision (or grounds for defense from the counter suit if they fire him) either way.”
AD 10: “Ohio State can’t afford to bring him back and then a year later something comes out. You did the first story, by now there’s 100 reporters trying to find anything new. When you have that many people looking they’re going to dig and dig and when you did that much, you’re going to find dirt. Nobody’s perfect.”
AD 11: “I think they are handling exactly like they should with an independent group. Investigation has to be from outside athletics, trustees and board. Good job putting this group together.”
AD 12: “This decision (on Meyer’s future) will be a true measure on the morality of college football in today’s landscape. That’s the reality. If he remains their coach, we’ve all lost our minds.”
AD 13: “This is obviously big and three insiders and three respected outsiders will give the investigation credence. I think they are just looking to do it right.”
AD 14: “You have to uncover everything based on how they’ve handled it so far, so the assistant’s (jobs) also could be at risk if they knew about it.”
AD 15: “Separately, I imagine there is talk of settlement at some level – but I’d be surprised if Urban gives in anytime soon.”
AD 16: “This sets up as ‘CYA’ if they want to keep him. But they are smart to have someone else adjudicate this given how Baylor and Penn State initially handled their cases (which resulted in the presidents and athletic directors getting fired).”
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 10:12:24 AM
I still think the most important figure involved is the new, rumoredly serious president and the fact that it isn't Gordon Gee is a meaningful swing. Gordon Gee would probably blow off most of those quotes, even the meatier concerns like from AD #10, for example.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 06, 2018, 10:28:36 AM
This from 11 Warriors - pretty interesting

https://www.elevenwarriors.com/forum/site-stuff/2018/08/95003/how-we-handled-documents-related-to-zach-smiths-past
Good read and well handled by Eleven Warriors. What's most concerning is the trend of local police turning a blind eye to protect football programs. To be clear, this happens near every major program and is not remotely close to being an OSU only problem. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 06, 2018, 10:30:34 AM
It's easy to compare to Baylor and PSU, but the cases are wildly different legally.  Baylor faced Title IX scrutiny because it involved students, and PSU had tons of liability for failing to report child abuse.  This case doesn't involve students and doesn't open the university to any liability outside of some sort of claim from Courtney Smith.  Obviously, any investigation can turn up new information, but simply saying they need to fire Urban to protect the university is wrong (especially because if he did report things he could sue the university and open up all sorts of cans of worms).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 06, 2018, 10:35:15 AM
The outside AD perspective is actually fairly interesting, and pretty good journalism. It goes much deeper than what he did or didnt know. It gets into PR, the exposure and risk of others digging into your program, firing for cause or having to pay out. 

It’s a complicated matter that will fall in the lap of the President. The investigative body will be the semi independent source to guide him.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 10:39:30 AM
He either followed protocol or didn't,if he did then they'll have to find some other sacrificial lamb.Besides Zach of course
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 06, 2018, 11:39:21 AM
I think i saw this somewhere, but can’t dig it up now.

Zach Smith has hd his contract renewed / re-negotiated three different times in the last 5 years.

That’s what perplexes me. Assistant coaches get fired for calling one play wrong. For Smith, and knowing what they knew about his personal life, his social media antics, and his lack of player development; they didn’t even have to fire him. They could have non-renewed him three times, but didn’t.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 11:42:58 AM
was he the lowest paid assistant on the staff?

$400K at OSU isn't much
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 11:45:43 AM
If Urban Meyer stays and, as one specific example, Gene Smith becomes the sacrificial lamb, does anyone really expect him to just fall on that sword in a tidy fashion?
I'll admit I know very little about him as a man. But his public persona seems kind of antithetical to taking one for the team.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 06, 2018, 11:47:19 AM
Exactly, someone will need to be sacrificed in order to appease the media hordes who jumped both feet into this with out any sort of delay or investigation until after, all on the hopes of getting that main headline.

I agree with you Mario, Police activity around major programs does sometimes seem to be light.  The bigger the program, the more you would think it occurs, however, that was yesterdays law enforcement.  Departments had more flexibility to conceal things in the past, however in today internet world and with cell phones on everybody, that ability is less likely to occur.  Also the court of public opinion towards law enforcement the last 5 years has changed as well, and departments have seemed to swing towards more strigent enforcement and taking a lot of control out the officers hands and more control by the administration, who often time has their own political agendas and such in place.  I wont get into that area any deeper! 

One thing I will say, having investigated incidents related to DV, I find it odd that no charges have ever been brought forth by any of the prosecutors.  IF the 2009 Gainsville incident did involve physical activity and she was 8-10 weeks, in my 20 years of I have yet to meet a prosecutor who would not have filed anything, regardless if his wife did not want to be cooperative.  I have testified in cases, where one party decided to recant the story, and not want anything done legally, however, the prosecutor still pushed.  I know there are a few other legal beagles in here, maybe they can shed light as well, from the courtroom side, but my experience from the street side finds that odd.

As to Urban, as long as he did not use his position to influence any of the police departments from filing charges, and with the statement that he said he has always reported to his supervisors, I do not think they will/can him, and do not support it if they do fire him just to appease the media thought.  His arrogance got the better of him in B10 Media Day statement for sure, and he should look at having a better PR writer to prep him for those type of events.

My statement would have been simple:  Zach Smith is no longer with my staff, he has been released.  I am not going to take questions related to this matter, it is a private matter at this point, and I am here to discuss the upcoming football season, the players, and games.  

Would have saved a lot of trouble! 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 06, 2018, 11:49:19 AM
If Urban Meyer stays and, as one specific example, Gene Smith becomes the sacrificial lamb, does anyone really expect him to just fall on that sword in a tidy fashion?
I'll admit I know very little about him as a man. But his public persona seems kind of antithetical to taking one for the team.
IF Urban goes, Gene Smith better go along with him!  Two major head coaches out under his watch, no way would I keep him place!  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 11:54:24 AM
IF Urban goes, Gene Smith better go along with him!  Two major head coaches out under his watch, no way would I keep him place!  
What if Meyer stays because he reported up but Gene goes because he mismanaged his information and responsibilities? 
My post meant to doubt he'd go humbly.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 06, 2018, 11:54:37 AM
I think i saw this somewhere, but can’t dig it up now.

Zach Smith has hd his contract renewed / re-negotiated three different times in the last 5 years.

That’s what perplexes me. Assistant coaches get fired for calling one play wrong. For Smith, and knowing what they knew about his personal life, his social media antics, and his lack of player development; they didn’t even have to fire him. They could have non-renewed him three times, but didn’t.
I am sure the politics of his relationships kept him around, and somewhat shielded.  However, he was with Urban back in 09 and rehired to his staff at tOSU.  I don't fault Urban for not canning the guy, maybe the truth is more neutral than we know, or maybe he was given enough rope over the course to hang himself with this last incident. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 11:55:13 AM
I think i saw this somewhere, but can’t dig it up now.

Zach Smith has hd his contract renewed / re-negotiated three different times in the last 5 years.

That’s what perplexes me. Assistant coaches get fired for calling one play wrong. For Smith, and knowing what they knew about his personal life, his social media antics, and his lack of player development; they didn’t even have to fire him. They could have non-renewed him three times, but didn’t.
That's close to the center of my attention too. If he did something wrong (unlike his recent interview, Zach Smith does appear to completely fess up in published texts with Courtney) and we give the benefit of the doubt that it was properly reported by Meyer ... then why wasn't Zach fired (or at the very least not renewed) until it went public all these years later? 
There are no straightforward (or satisfactory) answers to that question yet.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 06, 2018, 11:56:13 AM
What if Meyer stays because he reported up but Gene goes because he mismanaged his information and responsibilities?
My post meant to doubt he'd go humbly.
With enough money, I am sure he would go humbly.  I always thought he should have been canned after the Tressel incident.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 12:08:17 PM
I think for Urban it will all come down to whether he actually reported up, as he's suggested in his public letter. 

Originally, his remarks to the press looked BAD. But if he has evidence that this was reported properly and he can fall on the excuse of "I was blindsided by the question at media days and handled it badly, not wanting to drag their private matters into the public eye more than they already were."
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 06, 2018, 12:23:57 PM
So, the best case scenario consistent with the facts is what here?

Meyer reported what he was supposed to report up the chain but lied to the media.  Anything else?

The worst case scenario is that he knew the situation, hired the guy, and didn't report and covered up the situation.

And I suppose there is something in between ...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 12:38:42 PM
I think for Urban it will all come down to whether he actually reported up, as he's suggested in his public letter.

Originally, his remarks to the press looked BAD. But if he has evidence that this was reported properly and he can fall on the excuse of "I was blindsided by the question at media days and handled it badly, not wanting to drag their private matters into the public eye more than they already were."

If he properly reported, I agree. 
I think the definition of that is broader than typically published, though: he will have had to have (1) promptly reported the 2015 incident *and* have (2) provided the context of the 2009 incident upon hiring Zach to OSU *and* have (3) reported any other credible events, even without criminal charges, that he is documented to have learned about.
If he did that, then he did enough to stay. I'd still be confused why he didn't fire the guy who admitted to his own DV allegations, though. So a bad PR scar will stick around for the foreseeable.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 01:23:20 PM
So, the best case scenario consistent with the facts is what here?

Meyer reported what he was supposed to report up the chain but lied to the media.  Anything else?

The worst case scenario is that he knew the situation, hired the guy, and didn't report and covered up the situation.

And I suppose there is something in between ...
I think you've pretty much stated it. Best case is he reported but lied to the media. 
As far as "in between", that he reported but tried to then influence the outcome of that investigation in 2015 to protect his friend. I.e. he took something that HR or the Title IX office would have recommended firing Smith and somehow made sure that wasn't the outcome.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 06, 2018, 01:46:27 PM
I think for Urban it will all come down to whether he actually reported up, as he's suggested in his public letter.
Do I have my info wrong? I thought we were past did Urban report or not.
I thought I read the Powell Police sent the redacted report to Gene Smith Directly. Gene notified Urban, and called Smith back from a recruiting trip to ask him about it.
Zach Smith claimed he only touched her in a defensive manner, she was the one attacking him.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 01:54:53 PM
That wasn't the only credible event to report. 2009 was another. It seems as if there were many other house calls that, even without criminal charges, may be classified as requiring report as well.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 01:57:29 PM
Do I have my info wrong? I thought we were past did Urban report or not.
I thought I read the Powell Police sent the redacted report to Gene Smith Directly. Gene notified Urban, and called Smith back from a recruiting trip to ask him about it.
Smith claimed he only touched her in a defensive manner, she was the one attacking him.
Did it ever get reported beyond Gene Smith and Urban Meyer? What are OSU's guidelines on where it needs to be reported?
Or did they just "handle it" internally?
Because if it's the latter, I think his goose is still cooked. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 01:58:41 PM
Also, if you believe McMurphy (and though his anecdotes are secondhand and he has a self-interest like anyone, still comes off as one of the most credible narrators of the story as everything is documented and none of the documents are anonymous):
Zach fessed up in published texts with Courtney to have strangled her among other abuses.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 02:08:01 PM
Did it ever get reported beyond Gene Smith and Urban Meyer? What are OSU's guidelines on where it needs to be reported?
Or did they just "handle it" internally?
Because if it's the latter, I think his goose is still cooked.
It is a key distinction. Though even if handled internally, Meyer can probably stay IF GSmith takes the fall instead.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 02:08:33 PM
Also, if you believe McMurphy (and though his anecdotes are secondhand and he has a self-interest like anyone, still comes off as one of the most credible narrators of the story as everything is documented and none of the documents are anonymous):
Zach fessed up in published texts with Courtney to have strangled her among other abuses.
Which is an important part of this overall story. Especially for the "victim-blaming" folks who seem to keep finding ways to suggest that Courtney is crazy/vindictive, or is making this up, etc etc. 
However, that part is not necessarily germane to what happens to Urban or others at OSU. Because while it is clear that they knew of some of the domestic violence allegations, they very likely did not know the full extent of it. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 02:18:36 PM
Completely agree. It's also relevant to whether Zach Smith was fired for cause and, if so, whether that firing was unreasonably delayed until 2018.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 02:23:17 PM
It is a key distinction. Though even if handled internally, Meyer can probably stay IF GSmith takes the fall instead.
Maybe. I'm not so sure though that he'd be able to avoid it, EVEN if Gene takes the fall. 
Because the issue, if that were the case, would be institutional. And while Gene is his boss, in many ways they're equally "powerful" in the decisions of what happens. I'm sure Urban has a lot of say in the matter.
So if it was Urban and Gene working together [without HR / Title IX], it would IMHO be seen as the sort of "old boys' club" sort of decision-making process and I'm not sure Urban can avoid the axe if that's how it played out.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 02:28:05 PM
That's the kind of judgment call that seems 100% tied to how strong they see Meyer's unlawful termination suit
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 02:46:48 PM
Which is an important part of this overall story. Especially for the "victim-blaming" folks who seem to keep finding ways to suggest that Courtney is crazy/vindictive, or is making this up, etc etc.
However, that part is not necessarily germane to what happens to Urban or others at OSU. Because while it is clear that they knew of some of the domestic violence allegations, they very likely did not know the full extent of it.
It's just that Courtney waited until Zach got the axe until she screamed "VICTIM" in the court of public opinion.IMO it just smacks of either vengenace/anger/payday.BTW according to McMurphy she tried to sell him the story.She could have gotten a comfortable settlement long ago.Their income was substantially more than the average American who get divorced everyday.So with this supposed weight of evidence why did she wait if the circumstances were already untenable,then silent after separation?Look it wouldn't bother me a bit if Meyer/G.Smith are sent packing.I'd just love to see this go to court
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 02:49:49 PM
So, the best case scenario consistent with the facts is what here?

Meyer reported what he was supposed to report up the chain but lied to the media.  Anything else?

The worst case scenario is that he knew the situation, hired the guy, and didn't report and covered up the situation.

And I suppose there is something in between ...
Winner,lock the thread
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 02:52:15 PM
It's just that Courtney waited until Zach got the axe until she screamed "VICTIM" in the court of public opinion.IMO it just smacks of either vengenace/anger/payday.BTW according to McMurphy she tried to sell him the story.She could have gotten a comfortable settlement long ago.Their income was substantially more than the average American who get divorced everyday.So with this supposed weight of evidence why did she wait if the circumstances were already untenable,then silent after separation?Look it wouldn't bother me a bit if Meyer/G.Smith are sent packing.I'd just love to see this go to court
But she left him in 2015, and the divorce was finalized in 2016. It's not like she stuck by his side. She had left--and yes, was probably already getting substantial child support. 
Oh, and he got the axe as a DIRECT RESULT OF HIS OWN ACTIONS in May 2018, when he decided to get himself arrested for criminal trespass, and apparently do enough to get a protective order slapped on him.
That's why this just bubbled up. Had he learned to color within the lines of his divorce, and not CONTINUE to be a problem, he'd still have a job.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 03:10:20 PM
IF Urban goes, Gene Smith better go along with him!  Two major head coaches out under his watch, no way would I keep him place!  
Ed Zacherey,they discussed this over on 11 Warriors.If two NC Winning HC's go down in flames during his watch,well then don't let the door hit ya Gene
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 06, 2018, 03:14:10 PM
But she left him in 2015, and the divorce was finalized in 2016. It's not like she stuck by his side. She had left--and yes, was probably already getting substantial child support.
Oh, and he got the axe as a DIRECT RESULT OF HIS OWN ACTIONS in May 2018, when he decided to get himself arrested for criminal trespass, and apparently do enough to get a protective order slapped on him.
That's why this just bubbled up. Had he learned to color within the lines of his divorce, and not CONTINUE to be a problem, he'd still have a job.
Exactly. Can't have it both ways. Can't say she wait for perfect timing to scream victim and she's crazy because she called 911 a ton in the same defense, which many are doing(not many in this forum, just many in general public).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 03:14:42 PM
Oh, and he got the axe as a DIRECT RESULT OF HIS OWN ACTIONS in May 2018, when he decided to get himself arrested for criminal trespass, and apparently do enough to get a protective order slapped on him.
That's why this just bubbled up. Had he learned to color within the lines of his divorce, and not CONTINUE to be a problem, he'd still have a job.
I have no problem with any of that but since you or I don't have access the financial settlement - that could be open & fluid depending on pay raises - color me skeptical
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 03:28:01 PM
I have no problem with any of that but since you or I don't have access the financial settlement - that could be open & fluid depending on pay raises - color me skeptical
That's true; we don't know the details of the financial settlement. But I don't know what you're skeptical of?
She may be angry and out for vengeance. After all, now that he's fired and the income is gone, it's not like she has anything to lose. I'll bet she's been angry for the last two years. Can you blame her for lashing out? 
But "payday"? In what way? Is getting Urbs fired going to get her a payday somehow? I don't think she has grounds for a civil suit against OSU or Urban for continuing to employ her ex-husband. 
I just don't see how she actually benefits from any of this. What do you see as her motive that makes you "skeptical"? 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 03:29:28 PM
IMO it just smacks of either vengeance/anger/payday.
and what is wrong with any or all of those if the victim has been treated poorly?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 06, 2018, 03:32:02 PM
I still have so many questions and I hope we get the answers.

 Some educated guesses are starting to form based on what we do know. 

 I think Zack Smith thinks he’s telling the truth when he says he did not hit her and has wrongly convinced himself that even if it was defensive it makes it OK.  The pictures support that    

 It sounds like he worked really hard with urban to convince him that the relationship was toxic that it was a two-way street, and there’s a decent chance that that is actually true, but again does not excuse 1 ounce of his behavior   Often when there is this level of hatred it’s usually because both people know how to press the others buttons and there are other aspects involved such as alcohol or drugs or whatever.   That might be why Shelley Meyer tried to convince Courtney Smith to press charges which we actually have proof of. Because they were getting two opposite sides of the story and OSU was unsure of what to do.  It sounds like for the long period of time Courtney admitted that she did not share the physical part of the abuse with urban’s wife. She also then expressed that others including her own family advising her to not press forward because it would cost her her major source of income    

 That’s why I actually believe Zach Smith when he says that urban Meyer said if you hit her you are gone      Because up to that point Zack was telling him he did not hit her and Courtney was telling Shellt that he did but she did not want to press charges.   

I also think that when Meyer answered that question at big 10 media days he was specifically referring to a text he got that said that Zack Smith had been arrested in 2015 per the reporters original Facebook post.    

 That’s why he said when they looked into it there was nothing there because at that point there was nothing there    

  Why he opened his big mouth and expanded that to give the impression that he knew nothing about 2015 is beyond me. He probably went off script and clearly that was a huge mistake   

 I am going to assume that it was all properly reported because I’m fairly confident he would not release a statement and say that it was when they could be so easily disproven    

I really want to hear what his wife says about this series of event.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 03:33:21 PM
so, possibly she is just pissed at Urban for something in the past that has absolutely nothing to do with any of this

found some leverage and is going to try to ruin the man's life

quite a stretch, but it's possible
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 03:43:24 PM
quite a stretch, but it's possible
Possible, yes.
The Occam's Razor explanation might be something more along the lines of "I've held all this inside for so long and I just have to let it out", too. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 03:59:38 PM
I just don't see how she actually benefits from any of this. What do you see as her motive that makes you "skeptical"?
Plenty,why not come out with this when the divorce is final?Why ask McMurphy to pay her for an interview if she's simply trying to give her side at seemingly a strange time?Perhaps greasing the skids for a payday against The University or it's arrogant coach?There's a big assumption that Zach Smith is 100% of the marital problem,even if he's 70% of the problem that other 30% coming from a "victim" can be preemptive and provocative.I'm not certain on the Earle Bruce story from her driving all the way down to Florida to ask Courtney not to divorce or press charges - Really?Because unless Zach Smith confirms this Earle is presently unavailable for comment
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 06, 2018, 04:09:10 PM
At this moment my personal opinion is:

Zach Smith is a POS. An Alcoholic. And what may have been intended as self defense/restraining measures went too far and became a pattern of abuse.

Courtney Smith is a victim of abuse. She feels cornered, has children and herself to think of and the almoniey is now gone. 

Shelley Meyer had good intentions in an extremely complicated potential abuse situation.

Urban Meyer followed the "letter of the law" but had blinders on when it came Zach. I don't think it should cost him his job, but I do hope the Meyers go on a crusade to bring awareness and prevention to abuse.

Gene Smith I have questions. Who does he report to? The Office of Compliance? The University President? Did he follow protocol?

Powell Police Department I have questions? Why aren't they releasing the reports(s) filed while at the Smith residence?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 04:32:27 PM
Plenty,why not come out with this when the divorce is final?Why ask McMurphy to pay her for an interview if she's simply trying to give her side at seemingly a strange time?
It's really not a strange time.  Ex-husband fired in very high profile position.  Reporters (McMurphy) start digging, find out about the reason for the firing and then continue digging, by going to Courtney for the "dirt"
This was probably not her idea in any way shape or form.  This was triggered by the WR coach's firing.  Not by an ex-wife with her hand out for $$$ or motivated by revenge.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 06, 2018, 04:41:37 PM
It's really not a strange time.  Ex-husband fired in very high profile position.  Reporters (McMurphy) start digging, find out about the reason for the firing and then continue digging, by going to Courtney for the "dirt"
This was probably not her idea in any way shape or form.  This was triggered by the WR coach's firing.  Not by an ex-wife with her hand out for $$$ or motivated by revenge.
sound possible, maybe even likely.
i also read that she attempted to sell the story to mcmurphy. but that was on here, i think, so no verification of that at all.
i've basically had my head in sand since friday with regards to this story. from what i've gathered the last few pages, the story has shifted a decent amount. correct me if i'm wrong:
urban is now thought to have passed the info along to superiors, though not 100% certain yet, yes? even still, some consider this not enough (not necessarily disagreeing with that thought). sounds like, if above is true, most think urban is safe, but still has some retributions to pay (likely in form of charity of some kind).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 04:57:17 PM
1. Plenty,why not come out with this when the divorce is final?

2. Why ask McMurphy to pay her for an interview if she's simply trying to give her side at seemingly a strange time?

3. Perhaps greasing the skids for a payday against The University or it's arrogant coach?

4. There's a big assumption that Zach Smith is 100% of the marital problem,even if he's 70% of the problem that other 30% coming from a "victim" can be preemptive and provocative.
1. If she's dependent on his child support, coming out with this when the divorce is finalized not only punishes him [loses his job] but that lost job punishes her and her kids. 
1a. There's also a well-known psychological issue that happens in a lot of abuse cases, where the victim has internalized that it's their own fault, or is ashamed of it, etc. Maybe she was just so relieved that the marriage was over that she wanted to put it behind her--until he continued abusing her.
2. Maybe she's scared of where her income is going to come from now that he's been fired? 
3. On what grounds? Because she's neither an employee or student it sounds like she can't sue them for anything related to Title IX. She's going to sue them for protecting him and keeping him employed, but only decides to sue after they fired him? I realize you're not a lawyer; neither am I. But if you can't articulate any legal grounds for a lawsuit, I find this hard to entertain. It sounds like wild speculation on your part. 
4. Nobody has assumed that, that I'm aware of. I believe based on what we've seen, most people in this thread believe that he was physically abusive to her. That doesn't mean that she's a saint. In fact, she might be more than 50% of the problem. She might be terribly emotionally abusive, "pressing his buttons" until he gets physical in rage. I'm not going to make an assumption either way on any of that. My gut tells me that if she eventually filed for divorce, she might not be the "make him mad until he hits me and then he'll treat me nice because he's sorry" type, but that's not really material to this situation right now, is it? Not sure why that makes a difference here or leads to your "skepticism"? 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 06, 2018, 05:04:36 PM
Plenty,why not come out with this when the divorce is final?Why ask McMurphy to pay her for an interview if she's simply trying to give her side at seemingly a strange time?Perhaps greasing the skids for a payday against The University or it's arrogant coach?There's a big assumption that Zach Smith is 100% of the marital problem,even if he's 70% of the problem that other 30% coming from a "victim" can be preemptive and provocative.I'm not certain on the Earle Bruce story from her driving all the way down to Florida to ask Courtney not to divorce or press charges - Really?Because unless Zach Smith confirms this Earle is presently unavailable for comment
Per a McMurphy interview, timing came because he got tipped off and reached out to her. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 06, 2018, 05:05:37 PM
My statement would have been simple:  Zach Smith is no longer with my staff, he has been released.  I am not going to take questions related to this matter, it is a private matter at this point, and I am here to discuss the upcoming football season, the players, and games.  

Would have saved a lot of trouble!
It sure would have.  PR is just not natural to most people.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 06, 2018, 05:07:00 PM
Did it ever get reported beyond Gene Smith and Urban Meyer? What are OSU's guidelines on where it needs to be reported?
Or did they just "handle it" internally?
Because if it's the latter, I think his goose is still cooked.
I'm not so sure of that.  In a practical sense, I think you are right because in a practical sense Gene Smith isn't really Urban's "Boss" in the normal sense.  In the legal world of Urban's potential wrongful termination suit though, Gene is Urban's boss and that is all there is to it.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 06, 2018, 05:07:25 PM
That's the kind of judgment call that seems 100% tied to how strong they see Meyer's unlawful termination suit
I was thinking the exact same thing.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 05:09:14 PM
I said up thread that the victim has nothing to do with Urban's fate

from the texts and pics and Zach's own words it's difficult to think she is not a victim of abuse

doesn't matter what type of person she is or what her intentions or motives are regarding Urban

what does matter to Urban is what Urban's intentions and motives were regarding the victim and her Ex-husband, Urban's employee

She could be crazy or a terrible person, that's not the question here.

The question is:  Is Head Coach Urban Meyer a selfish and terrible person who's motivation was to protect his assistant coach and therefore protect his football program
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 05:31:24 PM


Again - the boatload of evidence between texts,pictures,sealed police reports.Why wait until 2016 to bring the hammer down.A friend of mine got cleaned out and he and his wife had 5 children.He never laid a finger on her,yet she got everything.Maybe she and Courtney should exchange numbers.If things were that bad and they very well could have been,why not remove your children 1st and foremost?Appears she had a comfortable case along time ago,that's the case your presenting,not the remote chance what so ever she could be sticking around angling for more money?Prudence demands she get the kids out of there and file charges which she didn't do for a very long time.If Smith did even half of that I honestly hope he meets frontier justice.And they can send Urban back to the booth for all I care either.Anyway maybe we should toss back some of your homebrews and hope for divine intervention
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 05:50:56 PM
Dude,

Wasn't even her idea to talk to the media

was McMurphy who went to her
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 06, 2018, 05:51:35 PM
Anyway maybe we should toss back some of your homebrews and hope for divine intervention
:singing:
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 08:41:00 PM
Dude,

Wasn't even her idea to talk to the media

was McMurphy who went to her
Sorry FF just repeating what some peeps at the World Wide Leader said Saturday.Anyway if tOSU is going to get a black eye I'd prefer a Pirate with a patch(Leach) to a Pope(Urban) - with a Pirate at least you know what ya have
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 08:46:14 PM
Meanwhile: For all the shade Gene and Urban are getting, I couldn't be more impressed with how the university *seems* to be handling this. They sensed a serious and uncertain situation, began immediately with administrative leave, quickly formed a credible group of investigators, half of which are true outsiders, and have promised the public its report. 

We can only throw our hands up wondering why PSU and MSU couldn't responded so sanely. These are never times for circling the wagons.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 06, 2018, 08:47:58 PM
Sorry FF just repeating what some peeps at the World Wide Leader said Saturday.Anyway if tOSU is going to get a black eye I'd prefer a Pirate with a patch(Leach) to a Pope(Urban) - with a Pirate at least you know what ya have
This isn't to rag on Urban but to brag on Leach: that's so true man.
And I've been wanting Leach to come to the Big Ten for a looong time. His candor and style is so good for the game.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 09:11:31 PM
Seriously that's exactly who I wanted in 2011.Even went over to the Big 12 Board and discussed it.Got a lot of flack for being a loose cannon - but what you see is what you get,I like that.Besides I believe he has a law degree so there's that.Get a good DC and Leach could open a can of whoop ass with top 10 talent
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 09:19:26 PM
Sorry FF just repeating what some peeps at the World Wide Leader said Saturday.Anyway if tOSU is going to get a black eye I'd prefer a Pirate with a patch(Leach) to a Pope(Urban) - with a Pirate at least you know what ya have
sorry, I should be on the world wide leader
I like the Pirate
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 06, 2018, 09:30:33 PM
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95015/powell-police-chief-explains-changes-in-offense-reports-says-zach-smith-was-never-arrested-in-2015 (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95015/powell-police-chief-explains-changes-in-offense-reports-says-zach-smith-was-never-arrested-in-2015)

Powell Police clarify police reports.

Allegedly- the only person who has seen one with the “arrest” box checked is McMurphy, but he has yet to produce it.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 09:42:42 PM
So let me get this straight,McMurphy,Anonymous Redditt poster,Urban,Z.Smith maybe C.Smith and Shelley Meyer and maybe even the cops are all lying?well if football doesn't pan out they can always go to work in the House or Senate.Why lie like that?Unless of course it's to the IRS
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 06, 2018, 09:48:28 PM
McMurphy,Anonymous Redditt poster,Urban,Z.Smith, C.Smith,  the cops, and maybe Shelley Meyer are all in agreement that there was an incident of DV in 2015.

Urban said there was nothing there, but reported it to the proper folks in the Athletic department.  there's where the questions start
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 06, 2018, 09:56:23 PM
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95015/powell-police-chief-explains-changes-in-offense-reports-says-zach-smith-was-never-arrested-in-2015 (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95015/powell-police-chief-explains-changes-in-offense-reports-says-zach-smith-was-never-arrested-in-2015)

Powell Police clarify police reports.

Allegedly- the only person who has seen one with the “arrest” box checked is McMurphy, but he has yet to produce it.  
That story was interesting and informative. I have a hard time locking in on what it proved, but it did provide a more interesting picture.
I also scrolled to the comments and man do I regret it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 06, 2018, 10:10:56 PM
McMurphy,Anonymous Redditt poster,Urban,Z.Smith, C.Smith,  the cops, and maybe Shelley Meyer are all in agreement that there was an incident of DV in 2015.

Urban said there was nothing there, but reported it to the proper folks in the Athletic department.  there's where the questions start
"Eleven Warriors obtained two offense reports from Powell Police regarding the incident – one from 2015 and the one that was also sent to McMurphy on July 24 – neither of which indicated that Zach was arrested. "

The cops didn't arrest Z.Smith for domestic violence,if they agreed then supposedly by state law they have to go ahead and make an arrest even if the victim protests or recants.That's at least what I have read.He was arrested in May however
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 07, 2018, 07:14:20 AM
That story was interesting and informative. I have a hard time locking in on what it proved, but it did provide a more interesting picture.
I also scrolled to the comments and man do I regret it.
Well, it was originally reported that Smith was arrested on felony domestic violence charges, and obviously that is false.  Seems relevant to allegations that Urbs lied to everyone by denying it happened.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 07, 2018, 07:27:59 AM
It will be interesting to see who all gets sacrificed to the mob.  Lots of people have skin on the line.  If Urban reported up what he knew as he said on Friday they may have a hard time firing him for cause.  So, it would cost The OSU around $40 million to fire him.  That's a lot of cash for a sacrificial cow.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 07, 2018, 07:51:09 AM
Well, it was originally reported that Smith was arrested on felony domestic violence charges, and obviously that is false.  Seems relevant to allegations that Urbs lied to everyone by denying it happened.
That might be the first obvious thing in all of this. It's weird. The cops say no arrest, then kind of acknowledge saying there was an arrest in the paperwork. Then there's the part clarifying that an arrest either happens if the cops see the abuser actively laying hands on someone or when a prosecutor feels it can push a case fully through (a tall order to say the least). 
We know he said, 'there was nothing,' even after he got the phone call. So because there was no arrest, based on the standards above, there's nothing? Maybe, but again, it seems fuzzy, thus I'm not locking onto anything, preferring to wait it out.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 07, 2018, 07:54:27 AM
Going back to the media theme for a second, it was interesting to see the signs at that OSU rally.

So many mad at ESPN. ESPN didn't report this story. ESPN in fact held off reporting it for hours. I'm sure some talking heads said some bombastic things, but with the volume of talk and heads they have, that's almost assured for any issue. Yet the ESPN fake news was a point of contention from some folks (and the SEC?)

It points to this essential truth. People want to see something larger and vague to be mad at. ESPN has long been a crystallizing force for that. We see something we dislike, and that's what sticks with us. What made us mad becomes the whole thing, and we seem to like to get mad. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 07, 2018, 08:20:13 AM
It will be interesting to see who all gets sacrificed to the mob.  Lots of people have skin on the line.  If Urban reported up what he knew as he said on Friday they may have a hard time firing him for cause.  So, it would cost The OSU around $40 million to fire him.  That's a lot of cash for a sacrificial cow.
I think for obvious reasons, OSU is trying hard to make a case where Meyer is not that cow. If they come to the conclusion that he should be that cow, it will be interesting to see if the 2009 incident was or was not disclosed to oSU and Meyer’s part in that.
My gut tells he he’s still coaching at the end of 2018z
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 07, 2018, 08:31:48 AM
The police can detain you for a period, which is a kind of arrest at that point, and then release you with no charges especially if the other party declines to press.

So, you were sort of arrested, and then not.

The best case scenario for UM is that he properly reported all this through channels when appropriate.

The worst case is he didn't.

Maybe there is a third alternative, something in between.  Maybe it wasn't clear that a non-arrest should be reported.

Maybe it wasn't required to report rumors of marital problems. 

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 09:47:09 AM
McMurphy reported yesterday that Courtney's lawyer has not (yet) been contacted by the university or its recently assembled investigators. Hopefully only that's a matter of timing and will be corrected very soon.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 07, 2018, 10:21:57 AM
McMurphy reported yesterday that Courtney's lawyer has not (yet) been contacted by the university or its recently assembled investigators. Hopefully only that's a matter of timing and will be corrected very soon.
Also interesting he said she had made concerted efforts to press charges and never been arrested for an OVI. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 07, 2018, 10:37:26 AM
You either press charges or you don't,that statement would Imply that a Police Dept and maybe a Prosecuting Attorney are complicit.The hits just keep on coming - pun not intended,hell the way this case is going - ya it is
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 07, 2018, 10:47:20 AM
I suspect a distraught spouse could initially say she was pressing charges and a couple hours later say she wasn't.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 07, 2018, 10:56:36 AM
Maybe it wasn't required to report rumors of marital problems.
As a practical matter I can't imagine anyone being required to report "rumors of marital problems".  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 11:18:04 AM
As a practical matter I can't imagine anyone being required to report "rumors of marital problems".  
When taking "marital problems" generally, I think that's true. Though I still expect that manadatory reporters are trained/expected to even report *rumors* of domestic violence, even without arrest or criminal charge, just in case.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 07, 2018, 12:17:07 PM
Also interesting he said she had made concerted efforts to press charges and never been arrested for an OVI.
True.  She was pulled over 3 Times for driving very erratically- and each time blamed it on being upset about Zach, or being chased by him.  
It will be interesting to see if the standards of presumption of innocence will be equally applied to Zach and Courtney- as it relates to “was not charged”.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 12:33:44 PM
Given the 2009 public record and Zach's published texts with Courtney admitting to strangling her and assorted abuses, the proceedings really don't even require diving into whether Courtney is unreliable or has bad motives. Which is good for us, because that crutch is overused and ugly.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 07, 2018, 12:37:08 PM
True.  She was pulled over 3 Times for driving very erratically- and each time blamed it on being upset about Zach, or being chased by him.  
It will be interesting to see if the standards of presumption of innocence will be equally applied to Zach and Courtney- as it relates to “was not charged”.
Has that actually been reported? Or is anonymous BuckNuts site poster now being cited as someone legitimate? He provided no documentation with any of his claims that I saw. Just that a good buddy text him some info.
He threw a bunch of random stuff at a wall related to the victims five days ago, and then he disappeared from the earth. I suppose his time might have been occupied making signs for the rally yesterday.:57:
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 07, 2018, 12:39:26 PM
Given the 2009 public record and Zach's published texts with Courtney admitting to strangling her and assorted abuses, the proceedings really don't even require diving into whether Courtney is unreliable or has bad motives. Which is good for us, because that crutch is overused and ugly.
Translation:  not being charged does not mean innocence.   And I agree. 
Also 2009 is not really at issue.  It happened. It was acknowledged and reported. 
At issue is the 2015 incident.   What actually happened, was it reported, and how did false descriptions of it by a reporter and public? What if anything was done by the University to further investigate it, and so on   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 07, 2018, 12:41:18 PM
I think for obvious reasons, OSU is trying hard to make a case where Meyer is not that cow. If they come to the conclusion that he should be that cow, it will be interesting to see if the 2009 incident was or was not disclosed to oSU and Meyer’s part in that.
My gut tells he he’s still coaching at the end of 2018z
Why would the 09 incident matter to tOSU, he was in Florida at the time and I would guess that a background was preformed on Smith when he was hired, if they did not short cut things because of Bruce, but still, nothing to with tOSU in 2018.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 07, 2018, 12:47:15 PM
True.  She was pulled over 3 Times for driving very erratically- and each time blamed it on being upset about Zach, or being chased by him.  
It will be interesting to see if the standards of presumption of innocence will be equally applied to Zach and Courtney- as it relates to “was not charged”.
Was this validated by anyone? I don't think it was.
And I'm much more prone to change the standard due to one of the individuals being an abuser and another the abused. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 07, 2018, 12:47:45 PM
Translation:  not being charged does not mean innocence.   And I agree.
Also 2009 is not really at issue.  It happened. It was acknowledged and reported.
At issue is the 2015 incident.   What actually happened, was it reported, and how did false descriptions of it by a reporter and public? What if anything was done by the University to further investigate it, and so on  
Exactly, and that whole issue is still perplexing to me!  I am not sure how Ohio operates, but I know here in Indiana, DV was not treated with kid gloves.  I responded to many calls for service, and in some cases BOTH parties where arrested and went to jail.  The prosecutor I worked for filed charges regardless if both parties cooperated or not, especially if there were children in the household.  That did not mean jail time, often it was a court ordered counseling requirements and DFC visits. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 12:48:39 PM
At issue is the 2015 incident.   What actually happened, was it reported, and how did false descriptions of it by a reporter and public? What if anything was done by the University to further investigate it, and so on   
Those are no doubt at issue. 
This next part is different than my last reason for bringing up 2009 (or scattered other rumors of DV between then and now), but also at issue is (1) whether Meyer also reported 2009 and all other rumored events he heard and (2) if all events, rumored and documented, were reported, how did Urban and Gene interact about them and did it go any further than a discussion between them. And what is the University's standard for how far it should have gone.
If all of that checks out as per guidelines and contract, Meyer is safe.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 12:52:27 PM
Why would the 09 incident matter to tOSU, he was in Florida at the time and I would guess that a background was preformed on Smith when he was hired, if they did not short cut things because of Bruce, but still, nothing to with tOSU in 2018.
Bringing a "guy with this kind of history" into OSU and Urban knowing about that history probably required full reporting of it before Zach's hire (likely while the university vetted him - in case their vet and background checks came up incomplete with information Urban did have).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 07, 2018, 12:58:38 PM
Bringing a "guy with this kind of history" into OSU and Urban knowing about that history probably required full reporting of it before Zach's hire (likely while the university vetted him - in case their vet and background checks came up incomplete with information Urban did have).
This. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 07, 2018, 01:02:19 PM
Exactly, and that whole issue is still perplexing to me!  I am not sure how Ohio operates, but I know here in Indiana, DV was not treated with kid gloves.  I responded to many calls for service, and in some cases BOTH parties where arrested and went to jail.  The prosecutor I worked for filed charges regardless if both parties cooperated or not, especially if there were children in the household.  That did not mean jail time, often it was a court ordered counseling requirements and DFC visits.
You do have real life experiences, more so than anyone on this board I would imagine. I have also read some in the legal community sharing similar experiences. What's difference and what was different in the PSu case is that you're dealing with a powerhouse football program and the reporting and handling of events involving a member of the coaching staff would be handled different.
Again, don't read that as an OSU problem. I'm quite confident that if problems came up with someone on Bo's staff, the police went straight to Bo to handle it quietly. It's simply that times have changed so much in the last few years that now so much of this becomes public so quickly. 
This is honestly a fascinating situation. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 07, 2018, 01:04:18 PM
Bringing a "guy with this kind of history" into OSU and Urban knowing about that history probably required full reporting of it before Zach's hire (likely while the university vetted him - in case their vet and background checks came up incomplete with information Urban did have).
If they came up incomplete, with or without Meyer's input, then they need a new compliance/background investing procedure.  No different than hiring Kevin Wilson! 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 07, 2018, 01:12:11 PM
You do have real life experiences, more so than anyone on this board I would imagine. I have also read some in the legal community sharing similar experiences. What's difference and what was different in the PSu case is that you're dealing with a powerhouse football program and the reporting and handling of events involving a member of the coaching staff would be handled different.
Again, don't read that as an OSU problem. I'm quite confident that if problems came up with someone on Bo's staff, the police went straight to Bo to handle it quietly. It's simply that times have changed so much in the last few years that now so much of this becomes public so quickly.
This is honestly a fascinating situation.
I agree Mario, someone else posted something to the same accord, but you are correct, in this day and age, things  can not be swept under the rug, regardless the program, like they used to be, and the PSU case shows us how it used to be done.  That situation would not have unfolded like it did in today's world, regardless the Coach, or program might.  Take a look at the happenings at many of these schools and all the big name coaches that have went away.  Information is way to easy to get, verify and send out! And I won't even bring up the civil pay outs involved.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 07, 2018, 01:16:48 PM
You do have real life experiences, more so than anyone on this board I would imagine. I have also read some in the legal community sharing similar experiences. What's difference and what was different in the PSu case is that you're dealing with a powerhouse football program and the reporting and handling of events involving a member of the coaching staff would be handled different.
Again, don't read that as an OSU problem. I'm quite confident that if problems came up with someone on Bo's staff, the police went straight to Bo to handle it quietly. It's simply that times have changed so much in the last few years that now so much of this becomes public so quickly.
This is honestly a fascinating situation.
Absolutely, and I think a lot of these guys are relics of that mentality, that I truly believe they are just doing things they way they've always been done.  They either give that answer and are so insulated by the big time college athletics world that they don't know why it doesn't fly, or they know it won't fly, but don't really have any other answer, because that's the truth.  As I've said, that's where I suspect Izzo falls too.  The police investigated, declined to press charges, I've done all I had to do.  That rubber stamp from the police was good enough for a long time to give the coaches their green light to proceed.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 01:22:17 PM
If they came up incomplete, with or without Meyer's input, then they need a new compliance/background investing procedure.  No different than hiring Kevin Wilson!  
Not necessarily. This point is essentially about the Venn Diagram of "What Urban knows" and "What is in the background check." It's possible that Urban didn't know anything that wasn't already in the background check. In that case, he might still be required to report his tidbits (as a formality), but you're right that it wouldn't actually matter in the larger scheme. 

On the other hand, if Meyer did know something beyond what's in the background check, perhaps because his and Zach's personal relationship gave him extra insight, then Urban would probably be required to report that and it in the larger scheme it would matter more (could plausibly be the difference between hire/no-hire). 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 07, 2018, 01:52:09 PM
Not necessarily. This point is essentially about the Venn Diagram of "What Urban knows" and "What is in the background check." It's possible that Urban didn't know anything that wasn't already in the background check. In that case, he might still be required to report his tidbits (as a formality), but you're right that it wouldn't actually matter in the larger scheme.

On the other hand, if Meyer did know something beyond what's in the background check, perhaps because his and Zach's personal relationship gave him extra insight, then Urban would probably be required to report that and it in the larger scheme it would matter more (could plausibly be the difference between hire/no-hire).
You would think that, however, and I don't know how deep of a background they conduct, or if you have ever had to go through an in depth background check, but from personal experiences, they are very detailed and its hard to disguise information from a good background investigation.  Be an interesting investigative report to see just how deep they go on hiring a coach.  If its anything like the NFL does on future players, its pretty deep and very thorough.  A friend of mine conducted background investigations for the Colts, and having been personally been thorough backgrounds on the local, State and Federal level (I was shocked that the Federal investigator tracked down my HS Football coaches, I did not even provide information relating to that, and asked questions), its hard to see any information relating to this incident going unnoticed.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 07, 2018, 04:52:57 PM
It will be interesting to see who all gets sacrificed to the mob.  Lots of people have skin on the line.  If Urban reported up what he knew as he said on Friday they may have a hard time firing him for cause.  So, it would cost The OSU around $40 million to fire him.  That's a lot of cash for a sacrificial cow.
I feel this is the 3rd time in this thread I've corrected this. The Powell police report went straight to Gene Smith, he reported it down to Urban and called Zach Smith back from a recruiting trip. There is no Urban didn't report it, his bossed called him in.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 07, 2018, 04:56:52 PM
well technically, Urban didn't report it

perhaps Urban knew about it before the police did or at least before the police took it to Gene Smith
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 07, 2018, 04:59:56 PM
Given the 2009 public record and Zach's published texts with Courtney admitting to strangling her and assorted abuses, the proceedings really don't even require diving into whether Courtney is unreliable or has bad motives. Which is good for us, because that crutch is overused and ugly.
Just a technicality here (I'm still in the camp that Zach Smith is POS): Saying your sorry legally is not considered an admission of guilt.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 05:22:54 PM
Just a technicality here (I still in the camp Zach Smith is POS): Saying your sorry legally is not considered an admission of guilt.  
That's fair. And I'm only somewhat serious when I ask this distinction, what if the person you are alleged to have abused says:
"Think about the past...think back to the cheating the lies and picking me up by my neck strangling me in Punta Cana and at our place in April. The abuse got worse bc u couldn't stand me catching u in ur lies."
and your first response is:
"I know!!!!!" (hopefully I transcribed the correct number of exclamation points there)
https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/status/1025500090578939904/photo/1
(https://twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/status/1025500090578939904/photo/1)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 07, 2018, 05:33:27 PM
admitting to strangling someone isn't saying you're sorry.  It's an admission of guilt
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 07:00:08 PM
Of course it is technically possible to fabricate an iPhone screen of text messages. Though I'd call that possibility meaningfully less credible than McMurphy at this point.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 07, 2018, 08:00:18 PM
I admit that I'm wrong to my wife all the time, doesn't mean I actually did anything wrong.

Of course the subject matter isn't DV.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 07, 2018, 08:21:08 PM
I acknowledge those two parts, too.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 07, 2018, 10:37:33 PM
Interesting interview I listened to with Tim May from the Columbus Dispattch. Pretty fair and balanced guy I have respect for ( who FWIW-has no idea how all of this turns out).

He confirmed what I suspected all along- that when Meyer answered that fateful question about the 2015 incident- at Big Ten Media days, he was specifically referring to the just released info that Smith was arrested for a felony DV.  

May said they ( he and at least one other media member) caught Meyer getting off an elevator earlier that day before he spoke to general media.  May asked Meyer about he report from McMurphy.  He said Meyer openly acknowledged awareness of the incident, and further said he had his people reach out to the Powell police to get more details. Meyer said they gave them nothing.  Police basically indicated there was nothing to see here.   Meyer wondered why would someone now say otherwise.

So clearly, later during the Big Ten Media gathering-having already acknowledged awareness to several reporters in the room, when he was asked that question he clearly was specifically referring to the new report ( which coincidentally got changed to reflect more accurately the no charges, not felony). He even used the same language. “There was nothing there.”

That’s why, contrary to what is being discussed across the media, his statement on Friday does not say he is sorry for lying..it simply says he did not intend to deceive.  In fact, and hate me all you want, I am not sure I could say he did lie.

Furthermore, when he says he was not prepared for those questions, again- he was not prepared for a story that just came out, likely well after he and OSU DID prepare him for what they thought the questions would be.

The more I learn the less I think he did anything wrong.  If he has the discretion to hire/ fire to some degree, I can certainly be critical of his judgement.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 07, 2018, 10:47:28 PM
his words at the Big Ten median days at the podium aren't going to cause him grief

those can be explained away by his statement later
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 08, 2018, 09:05:17 AM
Interesting interview I listened to with Tim May from the Columbus Dispattch. Pretty fair and balanced guy I have respect for ( who FWIW-has no idea how all of this turns out).

He confirmed what I suspected all along- that when Meyer answered that fateful question about the 2015 incident- at Big Ten Media days, he was specifically referring to the just released info that Smith was arrested for a felony DV.  
I listened to this interview, and then tried to read more about this part. I think if I was his boss, I'd go insane on him. 
The guy literally has a key anecdote, one that would endear him to Buckeyes fans no less, and he drops it on a random postcast. The Dispatch literally has a story of what you need to know about the situation, and THAT PART ISN'T IN IT. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 08, 2018, 10:14:01 AM
B.A.B. - BELIEVE ME,not all Buckeye Fans are endeared to or enamored with him.After reading as much as I care to on this saga I believe Urban stays.With the University,program and fans taking a drubbing nationally - which I don't like.And it won't be long before Meyer will be standing in front of a microphone lecturing the rest of us with his life lessons spiel like we're a bunch of contemptible little jerks who don't even deserve the privilege of his soulful,sparkling sermon

But for just for not having a prepared statement on a fired coach.When a player gets into trouble there is a prepared statement on the trouble.Yet this was much bigger than a weekly presser.And much bigger than a kid getting in trouble.With a coach who's arrogance & salary is much bigger than most NCAA coaches.My wish is that the Meyer's just go away with their chests of baubles already procured
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 08, 2018, 10:43:10 AM
B.A.B. - BELIEVE ME,not all Buckeye Fans are endeared to or enamored with him.After reading as much as I care to on this saga I believe Urban stays.With the University,program and fans taking a drubbing nationally - which I don't like.And it won't be long before Meyer will be standing in front of a microphone lecturing the rest of us with his life lessons spiel like we're a bunch of contemptible little jerks who don't even deserve the privilege of his soulful,sparkling sermon

But for just for not having a prepared statement on a fired coach.When a player gets into trouble there is a prepared statement on the trouble.Yet this was much bigger than a weekly presser.And much bigger than a kid getting in trouble.With a coach who's arrogance & salary is much bigger than most NCAA coaches.My wish is that the Meyer's just go away with their chests of baubles already procured
I meant the writer could build some credit with the lunatic fringe. 
But I see we're kinda close on most of this. I'd make a slight caveat. Salary much bigger than most coaches. Ego, I don't know he's too far from the pack. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 08, 2018, 10:48:46 AM
I was referring to Urbz not Zach - who wasn't hurting BTW either
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 08, 2018, 12:49:04 PM
When taking "marital problems" generally, I think that's true. Though I still expect that manadatory reporters are trained/expected to even report *rumors* of domestic violence, even without arrest or criminal charge, just in case.
FWIW:
My wife is a counselor in Ohio and thus is a mandated reporter.  She told me that DV is NOT one of the things she is mandated to report.  In fact, in her case, she is specifically prohibited from reporting it because of the confidentiality for her clients.  
Things that she IS required to report include:
That might not be a complete list (I'm not the mandated reporter, she is) but let me repeat the DV is NOT on the list.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 08, 2018, 12:54:58 PM
DV is not on her list. Meyer's contract has language including "Intimate violence." And I've read lawyer opinions that DV likely qualifies, if not fully stands in, for that terminology. Of course what those words mean can still be a fair conversation for this message board to rehash.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 08, 2018, 01:18:32 PM
DV is not on her list. Meyer's contract has language including "Intimate violence." And I've read lawyer opinions that DV likely qualifies, if not fully stands in, for that terminology. Of course what those words mean can still be a fair conversation for this message board to rehash.
I agree on that.  I was specifically replying to the "mandated reporters" in the prior post because that has a particular legal meaning, at least in Ohio.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 08, 2018, 01:20:45 PM
Just to add it to the record -- This is the new paragraph 4.1 (e) of Meyer's extension:
Coach shall promptly report to Ohio State's Title IX Athletics any known violations of Ohio State's Sexual Misconduct Policy (including, but not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual exploitation, intimate violence and stalking) that involve any student, faculty or staff or that is in connection with a university sponsored activity or event. ... For purposes of this Section 4.1 (e), a "known violation" shall mean a violation or allegation of a violation of Title IX that Coach is aware of or has reasonable cause is taking place or may have taken place.
Another new paragraph expresses that failure to follow this rule could void the contract.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on August 08, 2018, 01:43:10 PM
Just to add it to the record -- This is the new paragraph 4.1 (e) of Meyer's extension:
Coach shall promptly report to Ohio State's Title IX Athletics any known violations of Ohio State's Sexual Misconduct Policy (including, but not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual exploitation, intimate violence and stalking) that involve any student, faculty or staff or that is in connection with a university sponsored activity or event. ... For purposes of this Section 4.1 (e), a "known violation" shall mean a violation or allegation of a violation of Title IX that Coach is aware of or has reasonable cause is taking place or may have taken place.
Another new paragraph expresses that failure to follow this rule could void the contract.
Not trying to justify not reporting (if he didn't), but all of those terms are in the context of Sexual Misconduct. Maybe I am not informed as to where domestic violence falls under, but I won't think it falls under Sexual misconduct.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 08, 2018, 02:18:41 PM
We are getting caught in the minutia of mandated reporter language. I think he is ok on the legal side. I also dont think he is going down for lying to the media. That opens Pandora's box with many coaches. Urban might want to paint over the wall of program values however. The top two on that wall are Honesty and Treat Women with Respect. It's tough to explain the coaching staff failing on the program's #1 and #2 core values.

(https://thespun.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Ohio-State-Benner-775x465.png)

This has been said before but the investigative group and the University President have to determine what details he knew about Zach Smith, how much was shared with the University, and what his management was of Zach Smith along the way. This includes going back to 2009. Did he tell the University his history when he chose to hire him? Why did he have his contract renewed multiple times? Zach Smith wasn't convicted, that much we know; but why was the program and University exposed to so much risk, especially when assistant coaches are fired everyday for things as simple as calling the wrong play. UM has probably sent a few coaches packing in his career.

I may be wrong, but I don't see a suspension coming. For non NCAA violations, it is hard to find a Power Five head coach getting an in season game suspension. Just my opinion, but I suspect he is either reinstated or gone for good in the next couple weeks. A suspension would be a cop-out. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 08, 2018, 02:26:46 PM
Not trying to justify not reporting (if he didn't), but all of those terms are in the context of Sexual Misconduct. Maybe I am not informed as to where domestic violence falls under, but I won't think it falls under Sexual misconduct.
I think the unifying tie is that they are examples of abuse between genders. And DV clearly fits there. If I'm mistaken, then what would "Intimate Violence" mean instead that also isn't already covered under the other items listed (harassment, assault, eploitation, stalking)?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 08, 2018, 03:10:27 PM

He confirmed what I suspected all along- that when Meyer answered that fateful question about the 2015 incident- at Big Ten Media days, he was specifically referring to the just released info that Smith was arrested for a felony DV.  


Did you listen/watch the media day and question that's debated? I don't know how anyone can come to that conclusion after watching it. He absolutely is referencing the 2015 incident. He has 3 sections of his response. Section 1) the 2009 incident. Section 2) the 2015 incident and section 3) the most recent incident. It's clear there is a difference because he transitions by saying  " and then this recent one.."
The question: 
Urban, you said earlier that you were aware of the incident with Zach in 2009. Your inquiry into 2015 was unfounded. You couldn’t find anything. Why fire Zack now if you kept him on staff after 2009?


He talks about the 2009 incident and his relationship with the family and young marriage and then talks about 2015 and says this:

Answer:
“…2015, I got a text late last night that something happened in 2015 and uh there was nothing and unless, once again there’s nothing. Once again, I don’t know who creates a story like that. And then this recent one…..

Youtube Video of Presser (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ev0uN0cuYg&t=197s)


I'm not saying this is an offense he should be fired for, but can we please stop trying to cover up for the guy for blatantly lying at this presser? The guy lied and got caught. I'm sure we've all been there, but what the guy said was dishonest.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 08, 2018, 05:34:29 PM
Did you listen/watch the media day and question that's debated? I don't know how anyone can come to that conclusion after watching it. He absolutely is referencing the 2015 incident. He has 3 sections of his response. Section 1) the 2009 incident. Section 2) the 2015 incident and section 3) the most recent incident. It's clear there is a difference because he transitions by saying  " and then this recent one.."
The question:
Urban, you said earlier that you were aware of the incident with Zach in 2009. Your inquiry into 2015 was unfounded. You couldn’t find anything. Why fire Zack now if you kept him on staff after 2009?


He talks about the 2009 incident and his relationship with the family and young marriage and then talks about 2015 and says this:

Answer:
“…2015, I got a text late last night that something happened in 2015 and uh there was nothing and unless, once again there’s nothing. Once again, I don’t know who creates a story like that. And then this recent one…..

Youtube Video of Presser (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Ev0uN0cuYg&t=197s)

I have seen it 1000 times. So let me get this straight: you believe that he was asked by several reporters on his way to that conference about 2015 and he openly acknowledged it and further declared that when he investigated it there was nothing there. But then he turned around and went ask the same question he was saying that he was not aware of it? So you think he thought the reporters he gave a different answer to just before that we’re going to keep it quiet? Give me a break  I have seen it 1000 times. So let me get this straight: you believe that he was asked by several reporters on his way to that conference about 2015 and he openly acknowledged it in further declared that when he investigated it there was nothing there. But then he turned around and went asked the same question he was saying that he was not aware of it? So you think he thought the reporters he gave a different answer to just before that we’re going to keep it quiet? Give me a break.   
I clearly disagree with you and feel he was obviously answering the question from the wrong angle and gave him miss leading answer but thought he was telling the truth by seeing the same answer he gave the other reporters which was that what informed that the 2015 incident was now being reported as a arrest for a felony he basically said there was nothing there. That’s why if you read his Friday press release he does not say I lied, he says it’s my job to give accurate and sensitive information that’s not deceiving and I failed on all counts.  
 I clearly disagree with you and feel he was obviously answering the question from the wrong angle and gave a miss leading answer but thought he was telling the truth by saying the same answer he gave the other reporters which was that when informed that the 2015 incident was now being reported as a arrest for a felony he basically said there was nothing there. That’s why if you read his Friday press release he does not say I lied, he says it’s my job to give accurate and sensitive information that’s not deceiving and I feel on all counts 



I'm not saying this is an offense he should be fired for, but can we please stop trying to cover up for the guy for blatantly lying at this presser? The guy lied and got caught. I'm sure we've all been there, but what the guy said was dishonest.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ohio1317 on August 08, 2018, 09:05:21 PM
I think odds are increasing Urban is coming back.  Odds on an OSU championship dropped somewhat with all this news, but has now risen back up.  Not sure if this exactly where started but can't be too far off.  Not that a bad season would be expected with Day, but think going back closer to old levels suggest the Vegas money think Urban Meyer is coming back.

I also kind of agree a suspension in someway actually most risky option.  If they conclude Urban did nothing wrong but lie at media day, story will die down (not disappear, but die down).  Suspending him admits something wrong and leaves issue alive longer and subjects more scrutiny for not firing.  It is actually easier to argue followed things correctly or fire and say no choice than taking middle approach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 09, 2018, 12:37:00 AM
I think the unifying tie is that they are examples of abuse between genders. And DV clearly fits there. If I'm mistaken, then what would "Intimate Violence" mean instead that also isn't already covered under the other items listed (harassment, assault, eploitation, stalking)?
I'll admit that this is a tedious thing to argue on a message board(civilly of course) but this is a legitimate contract law(breach) issue that would absolutely be challenged by a coach who has their contract voided under this provision for failure to report, what presently, (since none of us have seen the police reports (have we? I'm not following day to day) to evaluate the real time environment of the abuse) does not appear to be misconduct of a sexual nature.   My own ten second analysis of this excerpt suggests the provision is borne out of a specific Title IX (a law) policy that appears to be specifically related to sexual misconduct.  Not all violence against a person could possibly be considered intimate violence. Unless a court has found that any violence against a spouse or partner qualifies as intimate violence. I don't know the answer to that.
hypothetical:  If the abuse occurred at a public place, say a bar.  Sexual misconduct? Intimate violence?  
If the abuse occurred in the home, but say in the living room, kitchen. Sexual misconduct? Intimate violence?
In the bedroom, but not during moments of intimacy consensual or otherwise?
Put another way,  what else is Meyer required to report?  Knowledge of fraud? Theft? assaults of a non-sexual nature? Duty to report or disclose X are in every contract I ever draft/read or execute.  They aren't always read broadly.
The short version:  In a pure contract law sense, I don't think this provision demonstrates an iron clad duty to report all types of violent misconduct, just those defined above.  Perhaps there's dispositive case law on the matter. I don't know.  Again this only addresses whether or not Ohio State can void his contract, not whether Meyer should have done X, or didn't do X.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 09, 2018, 07:57:47 AM
I also kind of agree a suspension in someway actually most risky option.  If they conclude Urban did nothing wrong but lie at media day, story will die down (not disappear, but die down).  Suspending him admits something wrong and leaves issue alive longer and subjects more scrutiny for not firing.  It is actually easier to argue followed things correctly or fire and say no choice than taking middle approach.
I hadn't really thought of this, but now that you point it out, I agree.  The most clear-cut and least risky positions for the school to take are either:
I frankly think that the Ohio State University has done a very good job of handling the fallout from this (not speaking to how they got here, just what they have done since the story broke) and that they will continue that trend by doing one of the two things you suggested.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: medinabuckeye1 on August 09, 2018, 08:01:30 AM
I'm not saying this is an offense he should be fired for, but can we please stop trying to cover up for the guy for blatantly lying at this presser? The guy lied and got caught. I'm sure we've all been there, but what the guy said was dishonest.
In the presser at B1G Media days Urban's answer was, at the least, definitely misleading.  That said, if we start firing coaches for lying to the media we'll run out of coaches pretty quickly.  Ie, what I am saying is that I really don't care if my coach or anybody else's coach is less than 100% forthcoming with the media.  
From a PR perspective it is rather surprising that Urban didn't have a prepared answer for this along the lines of what @Roaddawg (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=68) suggested upthread (something like "I am here to talk about the upcoming football season and am unable to comment on those issues at this time.")
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 09, 2018, 09:21:50 AM
Saw something about betting odds on this that he was favored not to be fired but to be suspended X number of games.

Suspended but not fired is a bit weird to me, kind of "Well you messed up but not too bad" I suppose.

That would leave OSU open to a lot of criticism, warranted or not, the usual claims of course.

If in fact he did mess up but only a little bit, whatever that means, I'd fine him and send the money to some charity I think.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 09, 2018, 11:16:58 AM
In the presser at B1G Media days Urban's answer was, at the least, definitely misleading.  That said, if we start firing coaches for lying to the media we'll run out of coaches pretty quickly.  Ie, what I am saying is that I really don't care if my coach or anybody else's coach is less than 100% forthcoming with the media.  

That’s a slippery slope. It really depends what the topic is. If we’re talking about coaches giving lip service because they’re required to answer media questions, then I completely agree. If we talking about a somewhat serious topic like abuse, it’s tough pill to swallow that it’s ok to mislead the media.
Again, this is not a fireable offense. That decision should solely be made on how reporting was handled, whixh I don’t believe any of us know. I think OSU has handled the post-fallout very well. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 09, 2018, 12:38:45 PM
That’s a slippery slope. It really depends what the topic is. If we’re talking about coaches giving lip service because they’re required to answer media questions, then I completely agree. If we talking about a somewhat serious topic like abuse, it’s tough pill to swallow that it’s ok to mislead the media.
Again, this is not a fireable offense. That decision should solely be made on how reporting was handled, whixh I don’t believe any of us know. I think OSU has handled the post-fallout very well.
I don't think it matters the topic, in fact, I would say the deeper the topic the less you give, keeping it boring is a great way to avoid a lot of issues and media fall out.  Most coaches can not do that because of ego or whatever, but those who have mastered that art, seem to be around for a long long time and often are not the focus of the media's venom or hype.  I present Bill Bellichick as a prime example, compared to a guy like Rex Ryan.  Or in college, a guy like Mike Leach compared to a Bill Snyder.  Mike Leach and Rex Ryan where both great to watch in interviews because you never knew what was going to come out their mouth.  Billichick, much like Tressel, are as much fun to listen to in an interview as it is to watch paint dry.
 Me personally, I never mastered the art of dealing with the media or others in that skilled manner, I am to much of a black and white, say like it is and move on, with a little gray area type of person, hence why I was never asked to do public information speaking during my career!  ;)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 09, 2018, 08:54:35 PM
https://www.cleveland.com/osu/2018/08/courtney_smiths_mother_zach_sm.html

Appears Courtney's mother and mother in law aren't as smitten with her story as McMurphy
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hawkinole on August 10, 2018, 01:18:35 AM
I have not read all 16 pages of this thread, in fact, I am late to the dance, and underprepared.

I suspect the thread should have been retitled about 8-pages ago, and the discussion should center on, "Is Gene Smith in trouble, here?"

And even then, the assistant coach and his wife seem to have had an at times explosive relationship. He makes good money. She probably doesn't want him charged because that hurts her as much as him. What is an institution to do? Blow the whistle on both when neither wants a formal complaint? I haven't read it thoroughly, but I am a lawyer who does some criminal defense. Domestic abuse often involves two parties going at it, unfortunately; it is difficult to prove. In a more populace neighboring county court administration told me that for domestic abuse trials the acquittal rate was around 90%. I attribute that to defense counsel knowing which cases to try. I am, as all of us are, acquainted with human nature, and economic interest. There is a reason this was not in the spotlight before, and inquiry into that subject should be just as keen as it is into Urban Meyer's somewhat tangential involvement.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 10, 2018, 02:15:38 AM
https://www.cleveland.com/osu/2018/08/courtney_smiths_mother_zach_sm.html

Appears Courtney's mother and mother in law aren't as smitten with her story as McMurphy
Who is Jeff Snook and why is he also doing all of his reporting on Facebook? 
McMurphy has no choice. Social media is the only option available under the noncompete clause of his ESPN contract.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 10, 2018, 07:03:31 AM
Who is Jeff Snook and why is he also doing all of his reporting on Facebook?
McMurphy has no choice. Social media is the only option available under the noncompete clause of his ESPN contract.
I think he mostly writes college football books.  I wonder if this thing kicks off a new wave of independent journalism.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 10, 2018, 07:09:07 AM
I suppose it is fair to question the source and his experience and motives.  Maybe less credible if he is pro-OSU.

I would remind those few who truly want the truth that the McMurphy report was also directly anti Meyer with respect to the motives, and that his “ investigation” involved interviewing one person.

That one of these people is Zach’s mom deserves the obligatory grain of salt.  But that Courtney’s own mother validates is very powerful.

It does make you at least wonder on a few things.  There has not been many. Folks to step forward and claim knowledge of the situation, but those few who have have consistently painted the same picture.

The relationship was toxic, the couple BOTH consumed way too much alcohol, she often was verbally abusive and belligerent and showed up that way at team events, and that the police were callled anytime she got super mad- and got very familiar with that routine. They never found a preponderance of evidence to take further action.

So it is a murky situation to assess for the University.   A boatload of he said she said and no police action to back her story.

I have wondered throughout this situation, beyond proper reporting and protocol, and phone calls to get the police version, what is realistic to expect of an insanely busy and successful head coach at one of the premier football programs in the land.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: NorthernOhioBuckeye on August 10, 2018, 07:12:38 AM
Who is Jeff Snook and why is he also doing all of his reporting on Facebook?
McMurphy has no choice. Social media is the only option available under the noncompete clause of his ESPN contract.
Jeff Snook is a sportswriter who has written several books Ohio State football, according to 11 Warriors. 

From some of the articles on 11 Warriors and the O-Zone, it sounds like Zach Smith's mother and even Courtney Smith's mother, are standing by Zach's stories claiming that the red marks on her arms were due to her starting fights with Zach and then standing in the door not allowing him to leave. Their claim is that he would grab her by her arms, pick her up and set her aside so that he could leave. 

Now I know that Zach's mother would not be credible on her own, but to have Courtney's mother in agreement, doesn't bode well for Courtney's credibility. Zach's lawyer also has said that they want their day in court to bring some of this out. 

As of this time, I think there is much more to this story than we have been told. I am not so sure now that Zach is the only guilty party in this fiasco. I will withhold my judgement on this issue until more is know. But at this point, it appears that blaming Meyer for any of this is a stretch at best.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 10, 2018, 08:42:58 AM
Who is Jeff Snook and why is he also doing all of his reporting on Facebook?
McMurphy has no choice. Social media is the only option available under the noncompete clause of his ESPN contract.
Quite frankly before all this blew up we could've asked the same of McMurphy.Not like because he was a 2nd string writer for the world wide leader it automatically qualifies him for a Pulitzer Prize.His gem was as one sided as as a Joseph Goebbels presser.I suspected there was much more to this story and as I said when the story broke I really hope this all goes to court.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 10, 2018, 09:57:48 AM
Quite frankly before all this blew up we could've asked the same of McMurphy.Not like because he was a 2nd string writer for the world wide leader it automatically qualifies him for a Pulitzer Prize.His gem was as one sided as as a Joseph Goebbels presser.I suspected there was much more to this story and as I said when the story broke I really hope this all goes to court.
Disagree, there were a good number of people pissed off when he was on the list let go.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 10, 2018, 10:20:22 AM
Maybe because they've(ESPN) been collectively swirling the drain as a credible source for a while I wasn't familiar with him.Right or wrong maybe the younger generations version of responsible journalism is different than mine.But I wouldn't think this one sided piece recently released is the barometer moving forward
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 10, 2018, 10:31:44 AM
I wouldn't say McMurphy's investigation consisted of interviewing one person. He also reported many documents that no one else had yet noticed (or that reporters had noticed and willfully neglected to report). 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 10, 2018, 10:51:08 AM
Like what?Because Courtney didn't start sounding off until her meal ticket dried up.Looking more and more like she is hardly a victim.If what's being reported in the last two days regarding Courtney's Mother/Mother in Law is remotely accurate well then Zach might just have a case.Haven't heard any chirping from McMurphy either,kind of strange considering 6-7 days ago this was looking like something 60 Minutes could be proud of
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 10, 2018, 11:27:14 AM
Honestly, seems like everything is dropping into place, which means the investigation will probably turn up some huge revelation.   But still, we seem to have answers to nearly every question about the matter.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 10, 2018, 11:39:14 AM
Disagree, there were a good number of people pissed off when he was on the list let go.
McMurphy has been a fairly well respected and recognized journalist for some time. He has had a number of news items and stories he has broken across college football, including 3-4 just in this offseason. 
We have people here citing an anonymous and random bucknuts poster attacking Courtney Smith, the least we can do is give a tiny bit of respect to one of the few decent journalists covering this sport.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 10, 2018, 11:45:41 AM
Total bullshit Hail,the information being gathered doesn't sit well with  the narrative that you have accepted as fact.Jeff Snook isn't an "anonymous and random bucknuts poster" .Try looking at all evidence in equal light and leave rooting interests at the door
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 10, 2018, 12:05:00 PM
so... in conclusion, if you're anti-OSU... Urby is the devil and OSU needs to fire him.   If you're pro-OSU, then the reports were misleading at best and Urbs is being unfairly portrayed/attacked.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 10, 2018, 12:13:42 PM
I really don't care if tOSU parts ways with Urban.I do care that many had their suspicions regarding nothing more than a bad relationship that's being used to tar & feather the University.Specially when it appears the accuser may have  either initiated/fabricated/embellished some of problems
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 10, 2018, 12:15:25 PM
Total bullshit Hail,the information being gathered doesn't sit well with  the narrative that you have accepted as fact.Jeff Snook isn't an "anonymous and random bucknuts poster" .Try looking at all evidence in equal light and leave rooting interests at the door
I wasn’t referencing Jeff Snook. Seems like a good journalist. Reminds me a bit of John Bacon.
I was referencing a poster or two on here citing her drinking problems and a number of other things only referenced by the bucknuts message board rube. It’s hard to scream #FakeNews about McMurphy, but then take a basement dweller hit and run message board guy as fact.
My point is McMurphy went with what he had at the time. When Urban said “I don’t know who would even create a story like this” at B1G media days, he more or less threw chum in shark infested waters. McMurphy had a bird in hand with Ms Smith. He leveraged that, asked for comment from Urban and Zach, then went forward. With each day that has passed since that more layers are uncovered by subsequent journalists. If you boil the ocean as a writer, you would never report on anything. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 10, 2018, 12:38:45 PM
Reading about the issue of Administrative Leave, and the media is seeming to make a huge deal out of the fact that Urban is not allowed to contact any coaches, have access to his email nor even be on campus-DUH! he is suspended with pay.  If he could have access to all that, why place him on any sort of leave at all.  Do not know of any employer who places an employee on leave, paid or unpaid, and allows them to continue on in their role.  Must be slow in the sports world.

The other hot topic is starting to focus on Gene Smith and what his future may entail at tOSU.  IF Meyer does go, I can not see him lasting the investigation.  I don't think Urban will take a hit for tOSU like Tressel did, and Smith would be unlikely to survive losing two huge named coaches.

Also, the NCAA now seems to getting involved, which I am not sure why they think they have anything to do with this issue and hopefully it is just a formality in conducting a full investigation.  I did not agree with what the NCAA did to PSU, and hope they do not jump in this and mess it even further.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 10, 2018, 12:55:55 PM
Maybe because they've(ESPN) been collectively swirling the drain as a credible source for a while I wasn't familiar with him.Right or wrong maybe the younger generations version of responsible journalism is different than mine.But I wouldn't think this one sided piece recently released is the barometer moving forward
That was part of the issue, they fired him to retain a bunch of shouting heads who don't do a lick of real journalism.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 10, 2018, 01:14:01 PM
Ya well McMurphy forgot to "Lick" the other side in this story....just sayin
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 10, 2018, 01:46:58 PM
I wasn’t referencing Jeff Snook. Seems like a good journalist. Reminds me a bit of John Bacon.
I like JB,pretty straight forward,fair,balanced and pretty engaging......for a UM Guy.You'll get just as much accuracy at Bucknuts as MGOBOARD FWIW
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 10, 2018, 01:59:42 PM
Ya well McMurphy forgot to "Lick" the other side in this story....just sayin
I agree with that.  Although I feel like people are attributing too much to his story, like he claimed to do some exhaustive hit piece on Meyer.  I honestly mostly stopped paying attention, but my initial take was that all his story did was question what Meyer told the media in Chicago, and based on Meyer's own apology for that, he doesn't disagree.  That all McMurphy's Facebook post does is show that he did in fact know.  He wasn't saying he didn't properly report, or that he was or wasn't covering it up, simply that he knew.  Anything beyond that, I don't think you can attribute to McMurphy.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 10, 2018, 02:08:55 PM
Good Point,thought I read awhile back publications/websites want to scoop the competition.Backpedal & explain later if need be
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 10, 2018, 03:57:10 PM
Quite frankly before all this blew up we could've asked the same of McMurphy.Not like because he was a 2nd string writer for the world wide leader it automatically qualifies him for a Pulitzer Prize.His gem was as one sided as as a Joseph Goebbels presser.I suspected there was much more to this story and as I said when the story broke I really hope this all goes to court.
:smiley_confused1:
Sports tribalism makes us weird. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 10, 2018, 04:56:03 PM
I agree with that.  Although I feel like people are attributing too much to his story, like he claimed to do some exhaustive hit piece on Meyer.  I honestly mostly stopped paying attention, but my initial take was that all his story did was question what Meyer told the media in Chicago, and based on Meyer's own apology for that, he doesn't disagree.  That all McMurphy's Facebook post does is show that he did in fact know.  He wasn't saying he didn't properly report, or that he was or wasn't covering it up, simply that he knew.  Anything beyond that, I don't think you can attribute to McMurphy.
Very good take. I couldn’t agree more.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 10, 2018, 05:50:50 PM


That one of these people is Zach’s mom deserves the obligatory grain of salt.  But that Courtney’s own mother validates is very powerful.


I thought the same initially until I heard that she and her mom are estranged.
Both sides are slinging some serious mud. The truth is probably somewhere in between.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 11, 2018, 11:56:20 AM
Gene Smith would be a tough loss, strictly from a talent evaluation and hiring standpoint. Hockey, Womens Basketball, Mens Basketball and Football were all fantastic hires. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 11, 2018, 12:37:03 PM
I thought the same initially until I heard that she and her mom are estranged.
Both sides are slinging some serious mud. The truth is probably somewhere in between.
So 3 related adults are estranged from Courtney all pointing at the same thing.You ever here the story of the boy who cried wolf.Courtney flat out lied about Earle Bruce driving down to FLA to talk her out of divorce.That was Zach's mom but Earle supposedly took the trip but stopped and saw Meyer.People made their minds up after the supposed avalanche of initial evidence.Now that the worm's turned seems the same folks aren't interested in pursuing the facts any longer.I'm really not concerned about this whole cast of characters,save the Program & University
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 11, 2018, 01:15:44 PM
Jeff Snook reporting that Tom Herman tipped off Brett McMurphy on this whole thing.  That might make for some icy conversations.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 11, 2018, 01:51:44 PM
Gene Smith would be a tough loss, strictly from a talent evaluation and hiring standpoint. Hockey, Womens Basketball, Mens Basketball and Football were all fantastic hires.
My grandmother could have made that football hire.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 11, 2018, 01:55:00 PM
Jeff Snook reporting that Tom Herman tipped off Brett McMurphy on this whole thing.  That might make for some icy conversations.
how could he possibly know that unless McMurphy or Herman told him? Why would Herman out himself if it was in fact him, and I highly doubt McMurphy would give up a source and name him in public or to someone else. That's not what good journalists do, and McMurphy is a good journalist.
This Jeff Snook character seems like a clown.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 11, 2018, 02:03:57 PM
I thought the same initially until I heard that she and her mom are estranged.
Both sides are slinging some serious mud. The truth is probably somewhere in between.
They are estranged? That detail is central to taking Snook's post at face value. How can we know if it is true? My expectation of good journalism is that those kinds of matters of source credibility be asked and reported.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 11, 2018, 02:24:33 PM
how could he possibly know that unless McMurphy or Herman told him? Why would Herman out himself if it was in fact him, and I highly doubt McMurphy would give up a source and name him in public or to someone else. That's not what good journalists do, and McMurphy is a good journalist.
This Jeff Snook character seems like a clown.
Oh really and your posts are rock solid and accurate because it fits your narrative.Courtney's less credible than you at this juncture.She never opened her yap until her payday disappeared.We've ascertained  what she is and now were figuring her price.You just jumped the gun and are now eating some crow - just leave some left for "good journalist McMurphy".So good ESPN left him go and kept Stephen A.And you would know a good journalist how?Because he runs with a hatchet job you find riveting.Again I'd love to see all this go to court.Urban being an ignorant,arrogant ass isn't a crime against humanity.If he had handled his answers better the University/Program wouldn't have a black eye
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 11, 2018, 02:29:35 PM
Jeff Snook reporting that Tom Herman tipped off Brett McMurphy on this whole thing.  That might make for some icy conversations.
Ya well Urban took a cheap shot at Herman last year,forget the situation but he piled on for seemingly no reason.Prolly trying to keep a foot in the door on Texas recruiting
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 11, 2018, 02:31:58 PM
They are estranged? That detail is central to taking Snook's post at face value. How can we know if it is true? My expectation of good journalism is that those kinds of matters of source credibility be asked and reported.
Well let’s be consistent.   Are we saying that people who are estranged sling mud or potentially lie?
So  Courtney and Zack are estranged.   Which one, or both, are telling the truth.
So far the only people close to the situation, the two moms, are totally rejecting her story, and furthermore, saying she openly stated she bring Zack down and take down Urban too.   The only factual evidence is police reports which fall in Zacks favor.  At no time while he was at OSU did they feel a preponderance of evidence called for an arrest.
All she has is her version and some texts- with no clear context, and some pics which don’t prove anything, and may in fact support Zacks and his mom’s claim that he had to remove her so he could exit.
Look, I am not saying I don’t believe her, but it seems pretty obvious there really is two or even three sides to this, as there almost always is.  This was a volatile relationship it seems, and both were pressing the others buttons.
Haven’t you wondered why she saved texts from 2015? Why was she waiting on the porch with a camera when he dropped his kid off, after (according to him, and verifiable) he could not reach her when she was not at the designated drop off spot for their kid?
I am still waiting for facts about reporting and protocol before I develop any final opinions.  But saying McMurphys journalism is good is kind of stretch, and questioning Snook is too.  
Where it sits now, I don’t even think of this as a Meyer issue unless someone produces facts that show otherwise.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 11, 2018, 02:35:56 PM
The wife’s mom I think just shared texts with McMurphy that contradict her last interview. 70s people might be insane. Perio The wife‘s mom I think just shared texts with McMurphy that contradict her last interview. Some of these people might be insane. 

 I have not had time to dig through as I’m driving somewhere. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 11, 2018, 02:54:55 PM
For sure, HB! People who are estranged may not lie but have motive to lie that others don't. Yes this applies to everyone. 

We all knew that potential of Courtney when the story hit. But then there were these text messages to corroborate, which increased her credibility. 

When the "counter evidence" interview with Courtney's mom came out, Snook never told us they are estranged. If true, he either withheld it or, more innocently, failed to ask.

I'm now asking whether it is true. If it is true, then her mom's take has less credibility than we initially wondered and since it is the bedrock detail from Snook's first Facebook post, Courtney's credibility would remain unchanged from what we first expected when we ALL thought "Hmm but wouldn't she want to lie? But ew, how to explain those text messages with Shelley and from Zach?"

So that's a key crossroad. And we shouldn't cross it until we actually know if she and her mom are estranged. I have no idea. I have only read a rumor that Super heard from someone else.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 11, 2018, 02:58:12 PM
The wife’s mom I think just shared texts with McMurphy that contradict her last interview. 70s people might be insane. Perio The wife‘s mom I think just shared texts with McMurphy that contradict her last interview. Some of these people might be insane.

 I have not had time to dig through as I’m driving somewhere.
For the board:
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=2059446414079412&id=823615204329212
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 11, 2018, 03:40:08 PM
Trying to make heads or tails of all this?  Good f'n luck.  

BTW, as someone with rather a lot of experience with defending and prosecuting domestic violence, this is the status quo for these things.  While the national media had the fixation of the doting fawn being manhandled by the evil abuser, it's hardly surprising that as new details emerge and new facts arise that the national types shrivel up, the preferred narrative having evaporated away.

One can simultaneously say that Courtney Smith probably got pretty crazy on Zach Smith, and that Zach Smith has no business putting his hands around his wife's neck for any reason (outside of the fun reasons).  Zach Smith is no innocent victim, but I'm also not going to crucify the coach or athletic department for not knowing how to deal with this kind of stuff.  It's hard to deal with this kind of stuff - that's why it's a problem.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 11, 2018, 03:41:12 PM
McMurphy denies that Tom Herman is his source...

...At least we are getting a good soap opera there between the Facebook journalists.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 11, 2018, 03:41:30 PM
Very fair.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 11, 2018, 04:00:26 PM
McMurphy denies that Tom Herman is his source...

...At least we are getting a good soap opera there between the Facebook journalists.
It was silly on its face to think Snook would know the source anyway. Maybe Snook did (McMurphy saying otherwise isn't strictly proof), but it'd be a super oddball coincidence. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 11, 2018, 04:54:05 PM
Well let’s be consistent.   Are we saying that people who are estranged sling mud or potentially lie?

That wasn’t the point at all. If I’m on good terms with my mom and we’re to go through a divorce and my mom took her side, that would be completely different than the same scenario but my mom and I hate each other and haven’t spoken in two years.  Many folks were making the argument that even her mom was defending Zach. That’s a less powerful fact knowing they aren’t on good terms.
This entire thing is a giant mess and honestly, there may be a lot of batshit crazy people involved. This feels like day time televisions not a powerhouse football program. I’m interested to hear more facts about what was reported, not a bunch of crazies trying to throw each other under the bus.
My stance is that domestic abuse is a terrible thing and often when the law gets involved it’s very messy. My only issue from known facts was UM being dishonest in his statement which I know you and I disagree on, but it seems like the vast majority think at best he mislead with his answers.
If Meyer goes, think of how absurd the end of the last two osU coaches is. Tattoos and bad relationship ending the careers of possibly the two best coaches in OSU history? It’s just bizarre. Thank god football starts in 3 weeks.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 11, 2018, 08:56:38 PM
It was silly on its face to think Snook would know the source anyway. Maybe Snook did (McMurphy saying otherwise isn't strictly proof), but it'd be a super oddball coincidence.
it was a stupid dumbfounded allegation that this Snook guy- whom I'm sure no one has ever heard of before- posted on his facebook with zero evidence to back it up.
And to me it damages this Snook guys' character/credibility a lot.
Like I said, there is ZERO chance he'd know who McMurphy's source is. McMurphy ain't giving up his sources, no one would ever talk to him again if he did. That's not what reporters do. And why on earth would Tom Herman out himself to this Snook fella? He wouldn't.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 11, 2018, 10:28:18 PM
Maybe not Herman, but possibly someone in his coaching circle that he mentioned Smith’s history to previously. That to me is a semi realistic possibility. 

It’s semantics, but the individual is more a tipster than a source. All they appeared to do is point McMuprhy towards police reports. 

Herman did say he has supported Courtney Smith financially, which is an interesting nugget.

At this point I wouldn’t be surprised to hear tomorrow that this is a master plot by Putin, Saban or the ghost of Aaron Hernandez. Crazy soap opera!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 11, 2018, 10:31:03 PM
At this rate, I’m feeling like Meyer is gaining momentum. 

But I don’t believe that momentum is a real thing, so OSU will therefore find a whole bunch of dirt.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 12, 2018, 01:48:54 AM
Side tangent, not to continue any ongoing debate, just to get to the bottom of a single detail: 
Did McMurphy even need a source? All of this began because he found publicly available documents (of the 2009 events in Florida and of the recent protection order granted to Courtney against Zach) that no one had ever reported before. Which he reported the Monday of Big Ten Media Days. Within an hour of that report Monday morning, OSU said that it was a staff issue and they were investigating. Later that day, McMurphy also reported the 2015 DV incident, and within minutes, Zach Smith was fired. The next day, Urban took the stand in Chicago and unintentionally gave the situation fuel, leading to the interviews and publishing of text messages that followed.
So the question is where among these steps would McMurphy need help? Most of it seems like pretty standard journalism -- just following one's nose; using documents to find more documents. If he needed a source, it would probably only have been regarding the 2009 events in Florida (the first documents he was able to get his hands on). But even those documents were publicly available (yet strangely never noticed...or deliberately neglected) and could have been stumbled into.
My guess is that he either had no initial source, or that he did have a source and that guy was either at UF, part of the UF beat, or in the Gainesville criminal justice system. In any event, I'd be quite surprised if Snook actually had insight about the source that either didn't exist or did but was presumably far from his network.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 12, 2018, 07:17:20 AM
I don't see any problem with his reporting, other than the weird thing of him changing his story but not putting in a disclaimer about it.  I find that very weird.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 12, 2018, 10:02:31 AM
At this rate, I’m feeling like Meyer is gaining momentum.

But I don’t believe that momentum is a real thing, 
You must not watch much football...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 12, 2018, 03:31:56 PM
I don't see any problem with his reporting, other than the weird thing of him changing his story but not putting in a disclaimer about it.  I find that very weird.
Maybe unusual. But the change was correct (in good faith). And Facebook leaves an official record of all edits. So it's not obfuscation. Plus, I'm guessing that journalists typical make edits and the editor adds that bracketed addendum to make note that edits have been made. In any event, it's not a sticking point.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 12, 2018, 03:34:03 PM
You must not watch much football...
Actually, I am with BAB. I tend to think "momentum" is just an illusion that fits a convenient narrative in a sport that would be back and forth even if "momentum" *certainly* didn't exist.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MikeDeTiger on August 12, 2018, 04:26:05 PM
Actually, I am with BAB. I tend to think "momentum" is just an illusion that fits a convenient narrative in a sport that would be back and forth even if "momentum" *certainly* didn't exist.
On an LSU board a few years ago, a bunch of us had a HUGE row about this.  I didn't participate much, only read the thread.  I started out more like "Of course, momentum is a real thing, how could you watch sports and not get that?" but after reading the pages of back and forth, well-reasoned opinions, I wound up more like "Eh....it's not real after all, more of a nebulous term that covers a wide range of other tangible factors that are too nuanced and complex to describe quickly or often, but the term itself is mainly vague and meaningless."  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 12, 2018, 05:47:43 PM
You must not watch much football...
Momentum would be what? That good things just sort of compound on each other? Does that happen a lot in college football? It usually seems like things swing wildly, which could be momentum, but then that means momentum is broken and lost relatively often. At which point, I don’t know what it is. 
I think some teams ride emotional highs, but that’s often not a good thing. I never understand why coaches preach it so much, becuase bad momentum would compound just like good momentum. 
More often than not, it’s just a feeling. We can feel like Urby has momentum or not, but the only “momentum” that matters is behind closed doors. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 12, 2018, 06:40:33 PM
Okay, let me try this....momentum is like....a random number generator.  Or the shuffle function on your ipod.  We often notice that against all odds, consecutive numbers come up or the only 2 songs out of a thousand play back-to-back, something like that, right?  Well that's how randomness works.


So with momentum, I believe when a few consecutive good or bad things happen to a team, they're affected by the perceived boost/slight in the corresponding way.  Whether you chalk it up to "the gods" or "it's just not our day" or "it's our lucky day" - yes, the reaction to the seemingly unlikely series of events influences the reactionary behavior going forward.  


ie - fumble recoveries are about a 50/50 thing.  But when your team loses 3 fumbles in a game...a-it's rare to fumble that many times in the first place, and b-to lose 3 in a row is even more unlikely....your team may overcompensate or simply lose their edge, motivationally speaking.  On the other hand, your team recovers 3 fumbles, you treat it like a gift from god and now have confidence, energy, and likely, a lead.


Believe me, I'm as big a stats guy as you'll find, but especially when it comes to these 20 year olds, momentum is a thing.  It's in the same boat as letdown games.  Whether it, in of itself, is a thing - the reaction to it makes it an actual thing.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 12, 2018, 06:42:38 PM
side note - i recently learned that Apple changed their music shuffle function algorithm to make it less random, because of the complaints of the perceived problem of too many consecutive songs playing.  


People don't seem to understand what random actually is.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 12, 2018, 07:27:30 PM
I didn't expect this angle but I can foresee our conversation of "momentum" oddly boil into a discussion of numerology. (Truly I mean no belief system disrespect) But whereas I didn't see it coming, this comparison is beginning to make sense. I think the two sides on momentum are similar to the two side on numerology, though momentum isn't as charged of an idea.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 12, 2018, 08:00:16 PM
I can think momentum is legit and still not cater to it....think back to one of those years USC or Georgia "was the best team at the end of the year", but with 2 early losses.  Sorry, friend, you lost twice, tough shit.  They may very well be the best team on Dec. 1, but because of their losses, they won't be in a position to find out.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 12, 2018, 09:47:31 PM
Herman and McMurphy denied it, but it appears a bunch of random Texas people started talking about Zach Smith in the days leading up to the report.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 13, 2018, 12:52:47 AM
Herman and McMurphy denied it, but it appears a bunch of random Texas people started talking about Zach Smith in the days leading up to the report.
I wouldn't be surprised if McMurphy's reporting was catalyzed by increasingly diffuse hearsay. But I still have serious doubts that the rumors originated disconnected from Gainesville (in Texas let alone from Herman pointedly). With our limited info, I'd sooner believe that the rumors were getting sufficiently diffuse that they were showing up in many places with a Meyer protégé. That would make this alleged scuttlebutt in Austin a correlate of the reporting and not a cause.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 13, 2018, 01:08:18 AM
Herman and McMurphy denied it, but it appears a bunch of random Texas people started talking about Zach Smith in the days leading up to the report.
what people? What are you referring to specifically?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 13, 2018, 07:22:57 AM
what people? What are you referring to specifically?
https://twitter.com/11W/status/1028712496323063809
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 13, 2018, 08:00:16 AM
Herman and McMurphy denied it, but it appears a bunch of random Texas people started talking about Zach Smith in the days leading up to the report.
Could that just be a reaction to the one guy posting the police report?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 13, 2018, 08:05:56 AM
"People are saying..."



Very 'presidential' reporting......~???
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 13, 2018, 10:16:32 AM
It's not a thing I'd like to spend a second googling. I take it that "Rom Tinaldi," Justin Wells and "VulgarATX" are connected to Texas?
If so, I admit that is interesting.
Still, I'd be careful concluding from it that the Texas community caused this. There's not enough info to reject the possibility that they we're also zooming into this story at a time when McMurphy was zooming in because diffuse hearsay was peaking ("correlation is not causation").
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 13, 2018, 12:09:45 PM
If Urban Meyer has a university issued cell phone, let's hope he learned from Hugh Freeze, and wasn't as careless with what was documented on it. I would assume that would be a big part of the investigation, especially since much of the evidence and conversation around who knew what has been based on text message chains so far. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 13, 2018, 12:39:27 PM
It appears to me that "RomTinaldi" was the original source.  There is currently a deep rabbit hole Bucknuts is going down trying to find who that is, which I am embarrassed to admit I find fascinating. 

https://247sports.com/college/ohio-state/Board/121/Contents/Was-the-source-of-the-tip-this-deleted-account-120604282/
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 13, 2018, 02:34:24 PM
Sounds like Zach was also arrested for OVI in 2013. To me, one of the most consistently surprising things about all of this is how insular and uninterested the OSU beat was to print bad PR when it came to Zach Smith. 
That's substantiated by the facts that (1) the DV events never came to light until now, that (2) the OVI arrest also remained on record but unreported, and then by (3) Ramzy's explicit acknowledgement that "everyone knew" about Smith's alcoholism and rumors of abuse but sat on these stories anyway, including himself.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 13, 2018, 03:53:10 PM
In the media's defense they are probably very used to dealing with Franklin County and the City of Columbus, but the surrounding suburbs all have their own ways of dealing with things.  This case went through Dublin's mayor court, and while it is on their website, I highly doubt reporters would check the suburban courts to check up on the WR coach.  Frankly, I'm a little surprised it took weeks to find that out since became national news.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 13, 2018, 04:00:37 PM
How many more days are left in the 15 day investigation?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 13, 2018, 04:21:22 PM
Latest thing...Courtney Smith's mom says she saw Courtney try to run over Zach with her car.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 13, 2018, 04:22:46 PM
Sounds like Zach was also arrested for OVI in 2013. To me, one of the most consistently surprising things about all of this is how insular and uninterested the OSU beat was to print bad PR when it came to Zach Smith.
That's substantiated by the facts that (1) the DV events never came to light until now, that (2) the OVI arrest also remained on record but unreported, and then by (3) Ramzy's explicit acknowledgement that "everyone knew" about Smith's alcoholism and rumors of abuse but sat on these stories anyway, including himself.
The saddest part of this one is that Zach Smith publicly ripped the Nebraska coach (Williams) on twitter when he was arrested for the same offense AFTER Zach Smith's offense. I guess Zach's fortune was a media contingent that was either complicit or ignorant to any activity in the Columbus area. At this point Zach deserves everything that comes his way. 
https://thespun.com/big-ten/nebraska/zach-smith-subtweets-keith-williams-ohio-state-nebraska
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 13, 2018, 08:21:41 PM
the husker press corp has no equal in college football
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MarqHusker on August 13, 2018, 09:00:40 PM
How many more days are left in the 15 day investigation?
Other than Urban's careless response at media day, this is the most dubious utterance by anybody involved in this from the osu side in this.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 13, 2018, 09:55:26 PM
Other than Urban's careless response at media day, this is the most dubious utterance by anybody involved in this from the osu side in this.
Thank you.
So, how many? Or, when will the extension be filed?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 13, 2018, 10:57:04 PM
so, this could go on another 15 days?  Until kickoff?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 14, 2018, 03:20:10 PM
Thank you.
So, how many? Or, when will the extension be filed?
The answer to that question is directly proportionate to how much of the $500,000 budget is left that needs to go into folks bank account!  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 14, 2018, 03:33:36 PM
I could see places like tOSU having a half million set aside in the budget for scandalous investigations 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 14, 2018, 03:41:26 PM
I could see places like tOSU having a half million set aside in the budget for scandalous investigations
The Ohio AG set the cap, it was not in a budget.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 14, 2018, 03:42:47 PM
Heh
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 14, 2018, 03:44:03 PM
I could see places like tOSU having a half million set aside in the budget for scandalous investigations
Money isn't an issue for any of our schools.   They can find it if they need it. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 17, 2018, 11:18:24 AM
Other than Urban's careless response at media day, this is the most dubious utterance by anybody involved in this from the osu side in this.
Yeah, so...
Ohio State (https://www.thescore.com/ncaaf/teams/507)'s investigation into how head coach Urban Meyer handled domestic violence complaints against an assistant in 2015 could extend beyond the school's initial two-week timetable, university president Michael Drake said Thursday.

"That's the projected goal," Drake said to WOSU (http://radio.wosu.org/post/president-drake-0#stream/0) of the probe, which was expected to be complete by Sunday. "The investigation is underway as we speak. It will be finished when it is finished. The most important thing is to get good information so we can make the right decisions going forward."
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 17, 2018, 12:23:20 PM
My thought has been that if this turns against Meyer, Drake is reasons one through five.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 17, 2018, 12:29:37 PM
Yeah, as I and others stated far, far upthread, this dude is not Gordon (OH) Gee.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 17, 2018, 03:05:32 PM
Yeah, as I and others stated far, far upthread, this dude is not Gordon (OH) Gee.
HE is not Gordon Gee, but I am sure he wants to keep his million dollar a year job in Columbus, and certain folks (big money) have expressed a displeasure in how this starting to drag out. They do not want to see a set back in the machine like happened when Tressel left.  Like it or not, money talks and football brings in the money in Columbus.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 17, 2018, 04:18:53 PM
HE is not Gordon Gee, but I am sure he wants to keep his million dollar a year job in Columbus, and certain folks (big money) have expressed a displeasure in how this starting to drag out. They do not want to see a set back in the machine like happened when Tressel left.  Like it or not, money talks and football brings in the money in Columbus.

Maybe. I'm not sure Drake cares, though (which is a good thing, I think). And I think he'd be more likely to stay high on the candidates list for the next job he wants if he ultimately comes off as tougher here, on the tough-weak spectrum.

If - in terms of aftermath PR - he comes off as weak on the football program, it will follow him like a shadow forever. (And that's even if he doesn't deserve the bad PR.)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 17, 2018, 04:36:05 PM
Maybe. I'm not sure Drake cares, though (which is a good thing, I think). And I think he'd be more likely to stay high on the candidates list for the next job he wants if he ultimately comes off as tougher here, on the tough-weak spectrum.

If - in terms of aftermath PR - he comes off as weak on the football program, it will follow him like a shadow forever.
I think he does care, on both fronts.  He is one of the Top 10 highest paid University Presidents, and depending where he wants to ultimately end up, a tough stance on this incident may not look as good for the next football power school considering him, but a university that does not have a power house football/athletic program may not care and scoop him up.  Hard to say for sure where he is coming from, he took a lot of heat over the Marching Band Director firing, but seemed to stand by his decision,and spent a lot of money in the process, so who knows, he may not care and may think he is above being replaced as well. 
Needs to wrap up quickly, the longer they drag it out the more of a circus it becomes. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 17, 2018, 06:04:18 PM
I doubt any of us can really say whether this kind of talk is overboard or not, but apparently OSU is losing a recruiting coordinator or recruiting staff member of some kind, who cited "uncertainty" and "moral values and family influence" for his decision.


“In light of the recent activity at The Ohio State University and the uncertainty of the ongoing investigation, I’ve made the tough decision to leave the football staff,” Knox wrote in a since-deleted tweet. “I have been offered a scouting position with the NFL Combine staff and National Football Scouting (NFS). I couldn’t be more blessed and the timing just seems right to take advantage of this opportunity to jump ranks back to the NFL. I want to thank The Ohio State University for the opportunity and experience gained during my time with the program. It was a very tough decision, but my moral values and family influence helped lean me toward this move. God Bless and Go Bucks!”
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 17, 2018, 06:07:21 PM
It sounds like the investigation will finish Sunday and a public report will come out sometime next week. I'm guessing Urban will learn his fate after the report goes public. Maybe there'll be a press conference.

https://twitter.com/brucefeldmancfb/status/1030564606450651136?s=21
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 17, 2018, 06:23:28 PM
And now there are these allegations. Cool guy.
https://watchstadium.com/news/zach-smith-sex-toys-ohio-state-offices-staffer-nude-photos-white-house-08-17-2018/
/ick
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: CatsbyAZ on August 17, 2018, 07:30:52 PM
/ick
Reading through the brief list of “toys” Smith ordered to his office and wondering if any mocking fan commemoration could be made of it, similarly to when Gators fans taunted Peter Warrick with Dillard’s bags. But no, just too trashy. Ohio State employed a lowlife.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 17, 2018, 08:15:08 PM
And now there are these allegations. Cool guy.
https://watchstadium.com/news/zach-smith-sex-toys-ohio-state-offices-staffer-nude-photos-white-house-08-17-2018/
/ick
This whole story has hurdled the shark. Then came back and backflipped over it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 17, 2018, 09:15:47 PM
And now there are these allegations. Cool guy.
https://watchstadium.com/news/zach-smith-sex-toys-ohio-state-offices-staffer-nude-photos-white-house-08-17-2018/
/ick
Hopefully anyone who thought McMurphy was a decent journalist now see him for what he really is, a hack who is desperate for attention.
Reporting something like this crosses all boundaries of balanced journalism, and any claim he had to doing the right thing just went out the window.
Not sure this does much for Smith- but I would imagine it helps Meyer since it clearly illustrate the desperation and agenda.   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 17, 2018, 09:32:33 PM
Can it be both?

Zach Smith is a POS, and McMurphy will do anything to try and get the clicks.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on August 17, 2018, 09:52:19 PM
Somewhere Earle Bruce is getting an earful from a guy named Woody. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 17, 2018, 10:17:25 PM
Hopefully anyone who thought McMurphy was a decent journalist now see him for what he really is, a hack who is desperate for attention.
Reporting something like this crosses all boundaries of balanced journalism, and any claim he had to doing the right thing just went out the window.
Not sure this does much for Smith- but I would imagine it helps Meyer since it clearly illustrate the desperation and agenda.  
A reporter receives a video of an Ohio State football coach having sex with a staffer in the University football offices in the midst of a serious investigation and he is not supposed to report on it? That’s the takeaway?? Was everyone who reported on Bobby Petrino “desperate for attention?” 
 Zach Smith has some serious issues, and probably needs to be institutionalized somewhere, before he harms himself, his kids, or anyone else, that’s my takeaway. No wonder Tom Herman is supporting Courtney Smith.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 17, 2018, 10:51:52 PM
A reporter receives a video of an Ohio State football coach having sex with a staffer in the University football offices in the midst of a serious investigation and he is not supposed to report on it? That’s the takeaway?? Was everyone who reported on Bobby Petrino “desperate for attention?”
 Zach Smith has some serious issues, and probably needs to be institutionalized somewhere, before he harms himself, his kids, or anyone else, that’s my takeaway. No wonder Tom Herman is supporting Courtney Smith.

Zach Smith is the former WR coach.  If him getting a blowjob is newsworthy, I guess it's newsworthy.  Hard to shake the feeling that McMurphy went from being a good reporter on an issue of importance to a tabloid reporter just throwing shit against the wall.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 17, 2018, 11:07:58 PM
A reporter receives a video of an Ohio State football coach having sex with a staffer in the University football offices in the midst of a serious investigation and he is not supposed to report on it? That’s the takeaway?? Was everyone who reported on Bobby Petrino “desperate for attention?”
 Zach Smith has some serious issues, and probably needs to be institutionalized somewhere, before he harms himself, his kids, or anyone else, that’s my takeaway. No wonder Tom Herman is supporting Courtney Smith.

Yeah, he was just sitting there and he “received a video” lmao.    And it is relevant to the investigation of the head coach how?   Please.   Don’t even try.   The guy is as much a POS as the guy he is trying to ruin.  What is to gain by this?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 17, 2018, 11:08:18 PM
Hopefully anyone who thought McMurphy was a decent journalist now see him for what he really is, a hack who is desperate for attention.
Reporting something like this crosses all boundaries of balanced journalism, and any claim he had to doing the right thing just went out the window.
Not sure this does much for Smith- but I would imagine it helps Meyer since it clearly illustrate the desperation and agenda.  
yeah, or not.
McMurphy broke this entire story. If someone keeps feeding him more info like he's really not going to report it? Yeah, Ok.
Zach Smith is a ratfuck disgrace of a human being. Says A LOT about Urban Meyer's character to employ a loser like that.
Urban wouldn't be taking so much backlash if he wasn't such a sniveling holier than thou douchebag who clams to be some sort of arbiter of morality and just an awe shucks good guy. When all he is in reality is a hypocrite.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 17, 2018, 11:33:09 PM
Just so I understand this....

-Zach Smith knocks around and strangulates pregnant wife.

-Zach smith continues to knock around wife

-Zach smith drives drunk PRIOR to publicly shaming and criticizing Nebraska coach for same issue

-Zach smith has sex with University staffer in football offices.

= Brett McMurphy is a bad guy

Makes sense
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 17, 2018, 11:35:49 PM
Just so I understand this....

-Zach Smith knocks around and strangulates pregnant wife.

-Zach smith continues to knock around wife

-Zach smith drives drunk PRIOR to publicly shaming and criticizing Nebraska coach for same issue

-Zach smith has sex with University staffer in football offices.

= Brett McMurphy is a bad guy

Makes sense
yeah, it's insane. I really don't get it.
You also forgot...
-Zach Smith ordered sex toys and had them delivered to work.
Who does this?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ohio1317 on August 17, 2018, 11:48:22 PM
While I think more has been made of Meyer response than should be, I don't have a problem with McMurphy.  I remember he was basically the go to guy during the last round of realignment (when things got serious, he seemed to be the first on it and I don't remember him ever being wrong).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 17, 2018, 11:57:20 PM
I haven't really noticed anyone attack McMurphy yet.
He's the only journalist involved to only report entirely on documents, many never-before reported, and none of them anonymously.
Plus, the trashiness of this latest news isn't on the reporter but on Zach Smith. And the details are sadly relevant because they go to character.
Also: The conversation can't become any trashier than Zach's behavior. He and only he defined that limit.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 18, 2018, 12:05:35 AM
I haven't really noticed anyone attack McMurphy yet.

You must not have friends or family that are Buckeye fans. I will honestly say that the reaction from some of the guys I consider my best friends is embarrassing. All they are doing is trashing McMurphy.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 18, 2018, 12:23:34 AM
You must not have friends or family that are Buckeye fans. I will honestly say that the reaction from some of the guys I consider my best friends is embarrassing. All they are doing is trashing McMurphy.
they are shooting the messenger for real.
doesn't make sense. Ohio State fans should be irate at Zach Smith and also at Urban for employing a literal scumbag.
But no. They are mad at Tom Herman- even though there isn't a shred of evidence that he is a "source" for McMurphy and they are ripping McMurphy for reporting on Zach Smith. Unreal.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 18, 2018, 12:27:39 AM
perfect tweet from long-time sports writer Matt Hayes...

Matt Hayes‏ @MattHayesCFB (https://twitter.com/MattHayesCFB) 6h6 hours ago (https://twitter.com/MattHayesCFB/status/1030582605035577344)


Sit back and let this marinate: Without McMurphy’s reporting, Zach Smith would still be the wide receiver coach at Ohio State. And it was “hard” for Urban Meyer to finally fire him — after McMurphy’s first story.
13 replies 46 retweets 152 likes



Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hawkinole on August 18, 2018, 01:10:05 AM
I will advance things forward with really no reasoning since I think if there is no public charge there is no accountability. Now there is, but there is very little for U-Meyer to account for. I would guess 1-3 game suspension. Move-on. Sooner the better.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 18, 2018, 06:51:55 AM
I haven't really noticed anyone attack McMurphy yet.
He's the only journalist involved to only report entirely on documents, many never-before reported, and none of them anonymously.
Plus, the trashiness of this latest news isn't on the reporter but on Zach Smith. And the details are sadly relevant because they go to character.
Also: The conversation can't become any trashier than Zach's behavior. He and only he defined that limit.
I don't see how it's relevant at all, at least in regards to domestic violence.  Relevant to domestic violence might be a report about his past and present partners and whether he was violent towards them.  Details on their lovemaking, not so much.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 18, 2018, 07:20:15 AM
I don't see how it's relevant at all, at least in regards to domestic violence.  Relevant to domestic violence might be a report about his past and present partners and whether he was violent towards them.  Details on their lovemaking, not so much.  
mmm... If it was "just a partner" yah no big deal. But it was an employee, while at work. Shows continue lack of character on Zach Smith's part. 
Taking pictures of your schlong while at the white house, again shows poor character. I think Zack wants to be in charge, and has shown he is willing to cross the line to be in charge (meaning it's very plausible he beat his wife, in more than just self defense.)
The buying sexy mens underwear as a gag gift seems a bit out there to report on.
Zach Smith is a POS.
McMurphy falls into the sensational trap our current society does, and that is to try and take down the shiniest apple on the tree. If it wasn't him it would have been a different reporter. His line of reporting seems at times to attack OSU, and as a fan of OSU that is hard to hear, but that doesn't make him the bad guy.
Zach Smith is the bad guy. Courtney Smith is the victim. The question still; Should Urban/OSU have done more, and done it sooner? 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 18, 2018, 07:35:57 AM
yeah, or not.
McMurphy broke this entire story. If someone keeps feeding him more info like he's really not going to report it? Yeah, Ok.
Zach Smith is a ratfuck disgrace of a human being. Says A LOT about Urban Meyer's character to employ a loser like that.
Urban wouldn't be taking so much backlash if he wasn't such a sniveling holier than thou douchebag who clams to be some sort of arbiter of morality and just an awe shucks good guy. When all he is in reality is a hypocrite.
Someone keeps feeding him more, lol.  You mean the ONE person he talked to in his “ investigation” lol?
Look, I get why you don’t like him- but there seems to be 5 versions of this situation.
The alleged victim, and the 4 others, which all seem to dispute her side. ( the police, the mom, the other mom and the accused).  And how you keep making this about the head coach is not credible.  At least not to a person who truly care about the truth.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 18, 2018, 07:58:01 AM
I haven't really noticed anyone attack McMurphy yet.
He's the only journalist involved to only report entirely on documents, many never-before reported, and none of them anonymously.
Plus, the trashiness of this latest news isn't on the reporter but on Zach Smith. And the details are sadly relevant because they go to character.
Also: The conversation can't become any trashier than Zach's behavior. He and only he defined that limit.
Documents, you mean the police report that claims an arrest in 2015 that nobody has seen or can find and that he has not produced? His report was based on texts, and one interview.  
His original claimed purpose was to prove their was domestic violence, and Meyer knew about it.   How you can now claim that Smith’s character is relevant to that central issue when the reporting has turned to his sex life...baffles me coming from you. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 18, 2018, 08:33:41 AM
Just so I understand this....

-Zach Smith knocks around and strangulates pregnant wife.

-Zach smith continues to knock around wife

-Zach smith drives drunk PRIOR to publicly shaming and criticizing Nebraska coach for same issue

-Zach smith has sex with University staffer in football offices.

= Brett McMurphy is a bad guy

Makes sense

Spoken like someone who has a predetermined narrative.
Let’s say you were at least partially interested in the truth, in other words, you opened up to the possibility that not everyone is a liar that isn’t calling for Urbana scalp.
Let’s say you gave CS 100% credibility, and all others close to the situation that have spoken publicly only 25% credibility. Your above post would like more like:
-Zach smith and his wife have some kind of fight in 2009, Zach is arrested. The Meyers, attempt to help them by getting them into counseling, believing that since they are young and newlywed, it can be corrected. Meyer reports it properly to his employer, and makes the bad jusdgement of keeping him on staff.
-Zach gets hired by 2 more schools after Florida. Nobody has published anything to see how well the vetting process worked or if it was done.
- Zach and his wife are now at OSU and have a very volatile relationship. They are both seen to be drinking and losing their shit in public. She is seen at Football events drunk and belligerent.  In some form or fashion, he is counseled about his performance at work and the impact of his personal life, as proven by published performance docs.
- she calls the police on him over the next few years, 8 or 9 times, with at least 2 or three of those being while she was driving erratically and he was not even around.
- the police never find a preponderance of evidence to arrest him.
- he gets an OVI, but hides it from OSU.  
- this all gets blown up by McMurphy, because he didn’t like Meyer deceiving people at Big Ten Media days.
- Courtney video comes out, public outrage
- Meyer says he followed proper protocol
- the only other witnesses and relevant parties to speak indicate Courtney was the aggressor, has a drinking problem, and that Zach never hit her, only restrained her.  Those three parties are her estranged mom, Zachs mom, and police reports which only indicate a complaint with no probable cause to take further action. Still, you have four sources versus one.
-now claims that Tom Hermann and his wife somehow made this go public, which is vehemently denied. However, it is not denied that the Herman’s are very close to Courtney and even loaned her $10,000, and it is reported and not disputed that Hermann and Zach, who were once pretty tight, had a falling out before Hermann left OSU, and that they had a bitter recruiting war over a Texas stud WR, which OSU won, just before this all blew up.
- lastly, information comes out, some not even substantiate, about trashy things thatSmith did relating to his sex life and doing things on campus that would clearly break all the rules.
Based on all of this, it seems more than plausible that everyone at OSU saw this relationship as extremely volatile, and anything they became aware of was reported, but they clearly talked with police and looked at whatever they could get as far as a reporting, and were in a tough spot as far as terminating him and risk of wrongful termination, until he actually WAS arrested.
The conclusion that is fair to draw now- Zach is an idiot . That was known and not disputed long ago on this board.  The degree of his idiocy may be much more pronounced now.
The central question I have now, and it is really the original central issue: was it clear to Meyer that Zach hit his wife after coming on staff at OSU, and if yes did he repot it properly.  If the answers are yes/ no, he should be fired.  If the answer is yes/ yes, could you make the argument that he should be fired for poor judgement, and should he be fired not for cause but for poor judgement, the answer is yes, but that becomes a matter of opinion.
So it has not changed, it still comes down to what Meyer actually knew to be FACT, and what he did about it.
Is it fair to think he knew that Zach was kinky? Reasonableness says no...how could he possibly know?  And in my opinion that’s what makes this latest round of McMurphy stuff trashy.  It is not relevant to the Meyer investigation.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 18, 2018, 08:41:24 AM
mmm... If it was "just a partner" yah no big deal. But it was an employee, while at work. Shows continue lack of character on Zach Smith's part.
Taking pictures of your schlong while at the white house, again shows poor character. I think Zack wants to be in charge, and has shown he is willing to cross the line to be in charge (meaning it's very plausible he beat his wife, in more than just self defense.)
The buying sexy mens underwear as a gag gift seems a bit out there to report on.
Zach Smith is a POS.
McMurphy falls into the sensational trap our current society does, and that is to try and take down the shiniest apple on the tree. If it wasn't him it would have been a different reporter. His line of reporting seems at times to attack OSU, and as a fan of OSU that is hard to hear, but that doesn't make him the bad guy.
Zach Smith is the bad guy. Courtney Smith is the victim. The question still; Should Urban/OSU have done more, and done it sooner?
Your take is a breath of fresh air and exactly how I feel.
Your closing statement is really the only question that remains for me. What should Urban/OSU have done, but the answer lies in details none of us really know, which is how much did they know?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 18, 2018, 09:47:13 AM
The people eager for Meyer to get punitive damages are part of the lynch mob-style, drag the most famous person with any connection to the actual problem down crowd.  



Whether he should or should not have told someone, considering the situation, is a personal opinion thing.  He's literally only guilty of lying to the cameras, which is something every coach on the planet has done.


The guy who is at immediate fault has lost his job and will likely never coach again, due to this hubbub.  The fact that there is so much peripheral 'stuff' regarding Meyer is yet another bit of evidence of the larger issue of our society.  Period.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 18, 2018, 10:20:03 AM
A coach lying isn’t part of the problem of society because every coach lies? Odd take.

Meyer is involved because he made himself involved. He poured gas on the fire when he stood in a press conference and arrogantly tried to embarrass a reporter in the room by saying “who makes up a story like that?”

He has no one to blame but himself and his ego. He could have given a PC answer, but his pride bested him and consequences are not always pretty.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on August 18, 2018, 10:25:14 AM
This would be a good thread to earmark for the next time Super Mario whines about posters picking on poor Michigan. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 18, 2018, 10:27:51 AM
This would be a good thread to earmark for the next time Super Mario whines about posters picking on poor Michigan.
When someone isn’t capable debating the facts, they attack the opposition. Pathetic and childish response on your part. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 18, 2018, 10:41:54 AM
The people eager for Meyer to get punitive damages are part of the lynch mob-style, drag the most famous person with any connection to the actual problem down crowd.  



Whether he should or should not have told someone, considering the situation, is a personal opinion thing.  He's literally only guilty of lying to the cameras, which is something every coach on the planet has done.


The guy who is at immediate fault has lost his job and will likely never coach again, due to this hubbub.  The fact that there is so much peripheral 'stuff' regarding Meyer is yet another bit of evidence of the larger issue of our society.  Period.
I agree OAM, with one asterisk.   If Meyer did not share info he had on this by following process/ protocol, in effect covering it up, I feel like he should be fired.  Right now the evidence of whether he did or didn’t is not public.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 18, 2018, 10:48:04 AM
A coach lying isn’t part of the problem of society because every coach lies? Odd take.

Meyer is involved because he made himself involved. He poured gas on the fire when he stood in a press conference and arrogantly tried to embarrass a reporter in the room by saying “who makes up a story like that?”

He has no one to blame but himself and his ego. He could have given a PC answer, but his pride bested him and consequences are not always pretty.


I actually agree for the most part.   When he said that, I firmly believe that he had heard about it being an “arrest” for the first time, the day before, and since he had it thoroughly checked out back in 15 that’s what he was referring to.he had no way of knowing that McMurphy had altered his story by that time.
The reason I am so sure of that is he proved it by answering that question just a short while before, in public and in front reporters,  and it was recorded by May of the dispatch. He openly acknowledged the incident and focused on the fact that when they checked into it there truly was nothing there per the police.
But to your point, he took an arrogant approach when answering in front of the big crowd just a short time later.   All he had to say was what he said earlier.  “ we looked into it in 2015. There was nothing to it for us to follow up on....no arrest.  I don’t understand why it’s being reported otherwise now”
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 18, 2018, 11:18:52 AM
A coach lying isn’t part of the problem of society because every coach lies? Odd take.

Meyer is involved because he made himself involved. He poured gas on the fire when he stood in a press conference and arrogantly tried to embarrass a reporter in the room by saying “who makes up a story like that?”

He has no one to blame but himself and his ego. He could have given a PC answer, but his pride bested him and consequences are not always pretty.


His error was not giving a throwaway answer to a question.  LOCK HIM UP!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 18, 2018, 11:35:28 AM
I don't see how it's relevant at all, at least in regards to domestic violence.  Relevant to domestic violence might be a report about his past and present partners and whether he was violent towards them.  Details on their lovemaking, not so much.  
It speaks to his character.
I agree that this report doesn't fit in the bin of directly contradicting Zach's DV denial (to which the text messages with Courtney and her mom and the police reports fit).
Instead this fits in the "How deeply entrenched are Zach's habits of doing creepy or trashy things?" bin, which, in case the other evidence wasn't enough goes to diminish his trustworthiness when it comes to allegations of doing creepy or trashy things, stalking or assaulting Courtney, for example. 
Another way to think about it, the idea that he doesn't deserve to be a coach becomes continually less surprising. So I guess this also goes to justice over his firing.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 18, 2018, 11:44:31 AM
I'm disliking this thread. The sooner the better, OSU. Get it done so we can talk football and shit.

I'm gonna make chili for the Badger game in 13 days.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 18, 2018, 12:40:44 PM
- he gets an OVI, but hides it from OSU.  
- this all gets blown up by McMurphy, because he didn’t like Meyer deceiving people at Big Ten Media days.
These two things are very strange points. 
It seems supremely unlikely one could hide an OVI from a program like that. He has to drive for that job. That means the school will need his driving record on an annual basis for the insurance they extend. There's not much chance no one notices that. 
There's a certain victim mentality with the second one. The mean, mean reporter saw the coach deceiving people, set out to torch him. It got blown up because it was a small story that got big for any number of reasons, which are all sort of independent of an under-employed writer.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 18, 2018, 12:50:20 PM
Someone keeps feeding him more, lol.  You mean the ONE person he talked to in his “ investigation” lol?
Look, I get why you don’t like him- but there seems to be 5 versions of this situation.
The alleged victim, and the 4 others, which all seem to dispute her side. ( the police, the mom, the other mom and the accused).  And how you keep making this about the head coach is not credible.  At least not to a person who truly care about the truth.
This is a fascinating part of this because I'd argue, in our hearts, we really usually don't want to know the truth.
In a post farther back, you lashed out at an "unbalanced" report, the balance of which can be discussed within the confines of journalistic balance and what balance means when someone's not talking at a later point. But we know the truth isn't balanced. If a pregnant woman got bounced off a wall, that it was charged or not has only a slight bearing on if it happened. Truth is something that did or didn't happen. They're both crazy and tie goes to this is overblown isn't a question of truth. 
In the end, there are many truths we don't and won't know. So we fill in, often with our own biases or what we'd like it to be. 
And in a larger sense, we really don't want truth. The truth is, large portions of the coaches and players we root for are truly unpleasant people. They are powerful, ultracompetitive and often came up in situations of being emotionally coddled and allow to get away with things. I doubt Zach Smith's boorish and fireable behavior is deeply rare (maybe rare to that complete degree). But we whitewash it because we like liking this sport, and thinking too hard about it can make that hard. The man who built my team to prominence was an enormous egomaniacal jerk, and his replacement was petulant, sometimes immature and always rumored to be making s drunken mess of himself. They made the team do the things I wanted and it was never so egregious, so I made peace with it. To a degree, lord knows we did with Urbs, we all do. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on August 18, 2018, 01:12:00 PM
When someone isn’t capable debating the facts, they attack the opposition. Pathetic and childish response on your part.
This was only my second post in this thread. I knew what it would be, and stayed out of it. I'm just laughing at how you were whining and crying about not being able to post here anymore because of all the subtle jabs that the big mean OSU posters were taking at Michigan during the Hoke and Rich Rod years, and how you would never conduct your behavior in such a manner. 
Enjoy your annual third place finish in the B1G East, assuming you can even pull that off (fourth place last year). 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 18, 2018, 01:27:35 PM
Drain the swamp,unless Meyer can prove otherwise.Players getting in trouble repeatedly is one thing.I kind of hate Coaches doing the same.And this has way more to do than just Courtney,btw I've read enough to feel she's not as far removed from a Jezebel as some of grandstanders sucking off McMurphy think.Urbans narcissism  and boorish arrogance is really giving the University a bad look.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 18, 2018, 01:40:07 PM
perfect tweet from long-time sports writer Matt Hayes...

Matt Hayes‏ @MattHayesCFB (https://twitter.com/MattHayesCFB) 6h6 hours ago (https://twitter.com/MattHayesCFB/status/1030582605035577344)


Sit back and let this marinate: Without McMurphy’s reporting, Zach Smith would still be the wide receiver coach at Ohio State. And it was “hard” for Urban Meyer to finally fire him — after McMurphy’s first story.
13 replies 46 retweets 152 likes




Evidently you and Matt Hayes both have your heads up your ass.Smith was fired because of tresspassing and violation of a restraining order.That happened before he broke any story.Does some homework before you repeat what some other schmuck says.Hayes should know better as supposedly he is being paid to do so
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 18, 2018, 01:42:40 PM
There must be something about this we all agree on. Let's cut Urban out of it for a second. 

So: Zach Smith: does ANYONE think "justice" means he should have kept his job?
I'm thinking we at least agree the answer there is no. That - even excluding the "we have to fire you because of the bad press" angle - he should/could have been fired for cause a whole bunch of times with the information we now have. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 18, 2018, 01:45:55 PM
Evidently you and Matt Hayes both have your heads up your ass.Smith was fired because of tresspassing and violation of a restraining order.That happened before he broke any story.Does some homework before you repeat what some other schmuck says.He should know better as supposedly he is being paid to do so
That's not an accurate timetable. You could argue that this was just a coincidence, that McMurphy wasn't the cause^^, but within an hour of each of McMurphy's two Monday July 23 reports (the Monday of Big Ten Media Days, 24h or less before Urban speaks), OSU (a) said they were monitoring the allegations into Smith** and then after the second report that day, they (b) fired Smith within minutes.

In both cases, McMurphy's report came first and OSU's response came immediately after.

^^(I don't think it's a good argument though)
**("We are not going to comment at this time on the situation regarding Zach Smith. This is a personnel matter and we don’t typically discuss such matters publicly. We are continuing to monitor.")
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 18, 2018, 02:01:11 PM
So you saying that's why he got canned?Because Courtney has previously sealed police reports when did McMurphy know as opposed to the OSU,because I heard about that incident before Big Media day

This from 11 Warriors
2018

MAY 12 – ZACH SMITH CHARGED WITH CRIMINAL TRESPASSING

Zach Smith charged with criminal trespassing (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/07/94446/zach-smith-arrested-for-criminal-trespassing-set-to-appear-in-court-wednesday) at the home of Courtney Smith.

JULY 11 – STALKING AND HARASSMENT REPORT

Courtney Smith files a report that Zach Smith has been “relentlessly stalking” and “harassing” her, a report obtained by The Lantern  (https://www.thelantern.com/2018/08/football-police-reports-depict-pattern-of-domestic-cases-against-zach-smith/)reveals.

JULY 18 – ZACH SMITH APPEARS IN COURT

Zach Smith appears in court (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/07/94446/zach-smith-arrested-for-criminal-trespassing-set-to-appear-in-court-wednesday) for a criminal trespassing charge.

According to an arrest record obtained by Eleven Warriors, police were dispatched to the home of Courtney Carano Smith, Zach Smith's ex-wife, around 8 p.m. on May 12. The report indicates that there was no forced entry and no suspected use of alcohol or drugs. Smith was charged with criminal trespassing, and has since pleaded not guilty.

JULY 20 – CIVIL PROTECTION ORDER FILED

Courtney Smith files  (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/07/94553/zach-smith-served-civil-protection-order-against-him-according-to-brett-mcmurphy)a civil protection order against Zach Smith. (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/07/94553/zach-smith-served-civil-protection-order-against-him-according-to-brett-mcmurphy) In the document, Courtney states that Zach “would corner me in my laundry while groping me and pulling his pants down and begging for sex,” and describes hidden cameras she found in her home, which she said were used by Zach to surveil her, their children and her boyfriend, according to The Columbus Dispatch. (https://www.cleveland.com/osu/2018/08/urban_meyer_on_administrative.html)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 18, 2018, 03:12:59 PM
The event that OSU first responded to that morning (Monday, July 23) was about the "aggravated assault on a pregnant female" arrest from Florida in 2009.
That was before Urban went to the podium.
It was an old story but never before publicly reported. Within an hour, OSU said they were monitoring the decision but wouldn't discuss it publicly. Later that day.
By the end of the day, 2015 became more widely circulated news. And OSU quickly fired Smith within 60 minutes of McMurphy's second report that day (still before Urban ever took the podium).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 18, 2018, 03:39:06 PM
This is a fascinating part of this because I'd argue, in our hearts, we really usually don't want to know the truth.
In a post farther back, you lashed out at an "unbalanced" report, the balance of which can be discussed within the confines of journalistic balance and what balance means when someone's not talking at a later point. But we know the truth isn't balanced. If a pregnant woman got bounced off a wall, that it was charged or not has only a slight bearing on if it happened. Truth is something that did or didn't happen. They're both crazy and tie goes to this is overblown isn't a question of truth.
In the end, there are many truths we don't and won't know. So we fill in, often with our own biases or what we'd like it to be.
And in a larger sense, we really don't want truth. The truth is, large portions of the coaches and players we root for are truly unpleasant people. They are powerful, ultracompetitive and often came up in situations of being emotionally coddled and allow to get away with things. I doubt Zach Smith's boorish and fireable behavior is deeply rare (maybe rare to that complete degree). But we whitewash it because we like liking this sport, and thinking too hard about it can make that hard. The man who built my team to prominence was an enormous egomaniacal jerk, and his replacement was petulant, sometimes immature and always rumored to be making s drunken mess of himself. They made the team do the things I wanted and it was never so egregious, so I made peace with it. To a degree, lord knows we did with Urbs, we all do.
I can only speak for myself, not the “we” you frequently throw out there.
I DO want to know what Meyer’s role in this was, very specifically.  I KNOW what I would do in certain situations, but not all. If he had certain, irrefutable information and did not do the right things about it, I would feel strongly he should be held accountable.
As others have said, if he is hypocritical on this topic of hitting women- again assuming there was certainty about that.....bye bye.
As for balanced reporting - I copied this from another article:
I'll refer to Society of Professional Journalism's Code of Ethics: 1) Balance the public’s need for information against potential harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance or undue intrusiveness. 2) Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity, even if others do.

If you think the crap McMurphy is spewing is even remotely relevant to this investigation of Meyer and OSU, than we just flat out are in opposite worlds. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 18, 2018, 03:49:08 PM
(1) It's not reasonable to believe that Urban's responsibilities here shouldn't activate unless the info he received was exactly "irrefutable." That burden of proof is far higher than "beyond a reasonable doubt." Zeroing in on that word, saying he's off if the evidence wasn't purely irrefutable, insulates you, no matter what we realistically learn this week, from ever having to change your mind.

(2) Some people are defending Smith and some don't think he should have been fired. Reporting about his sleeping with staff, photoing his genitalia, etc. is directly relevant to each of those items. 

(2a) It continues to go to character (he is alleged to have very *frequently* engaged creepy and trashy behaviors). 
(2b) It also strengthens the case that he stopped deserving his job years ago.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 18, 2018, 04:22:38 PM
By the end of the day, 2015 became more widely circulated news. And OSU quickly fired Smith within 60 minutes of McMurphy's second report that day (still before Urban ever took the podium).
It was my understanding from everything read,what % is accurate is yet to be determined,that Admn(Gene Smith?) knew about 2015 & '18.Zach's firing skids could have already been greased and happen to coincide with Media Days,press releases.I don't know how Urban couldn't know about it unless because charges previously hadn't been filed & police reports sealed they felt no need to tell him.I'm thinking Gene and Urban get shown the door.I pisses me off that URBZ could walk away with a healthy payday.Again though this is about Urbz/Ath.Dept's inaction more than Courtney playing victim.She has been proven a liar(abou Earle Bruce) and did indeed play the system for more coin.Screaming wolf only when the well run dry
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 18, 2018, 04:31:41 PM
It's true. The timing with the McMurphy piece could have been a coincidence. Or, even if the OSU brass already knew, the McMurphy report could merely have been the thing that brought enough negative PR to force them to act (fire Zach).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 18, 2018, 04:52:07 PM
I could have done without the $2,000 in adult toys being delivered to the football offices. He’s a creepy dude, that needs to be removed from society, but we knew that before this.

However, if evidence or a video comes available of an assistant football coach, already embroiled in a major scandal btw, sleeping with a subordinate admin assistant in the football offices, that’s a reportable story 100x out of 100.

It also sounds like this was another individual that shared this info, not Courtney Smith. Zach Smith ripped through Columbus like an F5 tornado for a decade. Now that the doors have blown open, people are lining up to share what they have.

Who knew what when is for the investigative body to figure out, but for the time being Zach Smith is public enemy #1, not McMurphy. 

Screaming fake news, calling McMurphy a “POS”, and mocking Michigan for whatever they finished last year in the West is the wrong place to direct your anger on here

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 18, 2018, 05:18:39 PM
this from Jeff Snook's facebook

But back to Herman.

He realized Sunday that he had to admit giving Courtney Smith money, which turned out to be $10,000 (even after staring into the cameras two weeks ago and stating he knew nothing of anything going on at Ohio State ‘because we weren’t there in 2015”) and yet, many actually still believed his denial.

And for the record, in the many subsequent messages to and from Michelle Herman since, I have demanded that her husband retract his denial and do the right thing and admit the truth.

I know he won’t, because he has too much at stake to admit the truth now. But he isn’t realizing one more thing: When the investigative committee releases every ounce of its findings, and his name is mentioned, he made a mistake by not admitting the truth and getting out in front of it ahead of time...

The Hermans had an ax to grind only with Zach Smith, as far as I can tell, and had to be shocked beyond belief when Meyer’s role became questioned and he was placed on leave. Smith and Herman, once very close from 2012-14, had a bad falling out since Herman left Ohio State. The wives, however, were very close and remain close.

Still, Michelle Herman told me this Tuesday about Courtney Smith via Messenger:

“She never told me she was being abused. She never told anyone she was being abused. Nobody saw any abuse.”

That, in essence, covered her husband’s responsibility toward his Title IX responsibilities while at Ohio State.

She went on to describe her relationship with Courtney Smith:

“We were close. I am not saying we weren’t close. We just weren’t that close while we were there. I wouldn’t call her my best friend, either.”

So why give her a substantial amount of money in 2017 (three years after the Hermans left Columbus)?

“When she needed to borrow money, she was drowning in debt and going to drop out of school. I said ‘that’s a bad idea. Then what will you do?’ I said, ‘Why don’t you let me loan you the money? I mean, it’s not going to hurt us.’ We loan people money all the time. Sometimes, we just give it to them.”

This also
I have reported that both Courtney Smith’s own mother and her ex-mother-in-law (Zach Smith’s mother) each have labeled her a habitual liar who was executing a pre-planned scheme to take down her ex-husband, and Meyer, himself. She spoke of it often, they said. They also claimed she was the one who committed domestic violence, with first-hand accounts.
*Consistent with their claims, the Powell police department never arrested Zach Smith despite Courtney Smith’s numerous 911 calls. No district attorney in Delaware County ever filed charges.*
Tina Carano, Courtney’s mother, described an incident in which her daughter purposely tried to run over her ex-husband with her car in the summer of 2015 in front of their two children. Zach Smith confirmed this as well. She also said her daughter has a drinking problem and “needs professional help.”
What say you, ESPN?
Crickets.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 18, 2018, 07:34:39 PM
(1) It's not reasonable to believe that Urban's responsibilities here shouldn't activate unless the info he received was exactly "irrefutable." That burden of proof is far higher than "beyond a reasonable doubt." Zeroing in on that word, saying he's off if the evidence wasn't purely irrefutable, insulates you, no matter what we realistically learn this week, from ever having to change your mind.

(2) Some people are defending Smith and some don't think he should have been fired. Reporting about his sleeping with staff, photoing his genitalia, etc. is directly relevant to each of those items.

(2a) It continues to go to character (he is alleged to have very *frequently* engaged creepy and trashy behaviors).
(2b) It also strengthens the case that he stopped deserving his job years ago.
So, see Nubzz post above about the very different versions.  You have multiple people saying Courtney spoke often of brining Meyer down, and being very violent herself. It appears, and I acknowledge this is not fact, the police were not inclined to press charges.
Now I agree with you about the “black and white” of irrefutable being a high standard.
But if OSU investigated the 15 incident and got wildly varying versions of what if anything happened, and the police would only tell them the evidence does not support her claims, I am not sure you could ask OSU to do much, and certainly not Meyer.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 18, 2018, 07:36:58 PM
I could have done without the $2,000 in adult toys being delivered to the football offices. He’s a creepy dude, that needs to be removed from society, but we knew that before this.

However, if evidence or a video comes available of an assistant football coach, already embroiled in a major scandal btw, sleeping with a subordinate admin assistant in the football offices, that’s a reportable story 100x out of 100.

It also sounds like this was another individual that shared this info, not Courtney Smith. Zach Smith ripped through Columbus like an F5 tornado for a decade. Now that the doors have blown open, people are lining up to share what they have.

Who knew what when is for the investigative body to figure out, but for the time being Zach Smith is public enemy #1, not McMurphy.

Screaming fake news, calling McMurphy a “POS”, and mocking Michigan for whatever they finished last year in the West is the wrong place to direct your anger on here


Agreed.   I would add that there is a lot of stretch based on what we know, to make Meyer public enemy number 1.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 18, 2018, 08:51:01 PM
This was only my second post in this thread. I knew what it would be, and stayed out of it. I'm just laughing at how you were whining and crying about not being able to post here anymore because of all the subtle jabs that the big mean OSU posters were taking at Michigan during the Hoke and Rich Rod years, and how you would never conduct your behavior in such a manner.
Enjoy your annual third place finish in the B1G East, assuming you can even pull that off (fourth place last year).
Actually, i have posted considerably less because I had two beautiful children and started a business. I found my time spent with my family and my career much more precious. When I began posting on CFN nearly 18 years ago, the forum was filled with class acts that loved the game. Gator, Badge, BbTZ and others had differing opinions but great respect. When I see someone like you posting like you are, it’s a quick reminder why my time is well spent on family and business.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 18, 2018, 09:52:56 PM
We love you Super Mario!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 18, 2018, 10:39:57 PM
I can only speak for myself, not the “we” you frequently throw out there.
I DO want to know what Meyer’s role in this was, very specifically.  I KNOW what I would do in certain situations, but not all. If he had certain, irrefutable information and did not do the right things about it, I would feel strongly he should be held accountable.
As others have said, if he is hypocritical on this topic of hitting women- again assuming there was certainty about that.....bye bye.
As for balanced reporting - I copied this from another article:
I'll refer to Society of Professional Journalism's Code of Ethics: 1) Balance the public’s need for information against potential harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance or undue intrusiveness. 2) Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity, even if others do.

If you think the crap McMurphy is spewing is even remotely relevant to this investigation of Meyer and OSU, than we just flat out are in opposite worlds.

I say we because by and large most people prefer to see their coaches and players as good people. If you'd always thought Urban was to a degree a bad dude, I happily retract the "we"
Your use of "balanced" was not what I was expecting. Usually in this context, it's about feeling a story was less down the middle. I didn't expect it to go toward the balance of privacy vs. right to know. 
I could probably make an argument both ways. It doesn't go toward the narrow story of did Urbs send spousal abuse allegations up the chain. It speaks to a superior deciding to employ someone who seems like a mess at a job that pays $400,000 of semi-public monies. The amazon thing is lurid. The White House thing shows unreal poor judgement. The sex acts in the office with a subordinate is the kind of thing that can get a lot of folks fired. 
I can agree the sex toy thing is undue intrusiveness, and about 78 percent agree the White House thing sort of is. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 18, 2018, 10:43:17 PM
this from Jeff Snook's facebook

But back to Herman.


He realized Sunday that he had to admit giving Courtney Smith money, which turned out to be $10,000 (even after staring into the cameras two weeks ago and stating he knew nothing of anything going on at Ohio State ‘because we weren’t there in 2015”) and yet, many actually still believed his denial.


And for the record, in the many subsequent messages to and from Michelle Herman since, I have demanded that her husband retract his denial and do the right thing and admit the truth.


I know he won’t, because he has too much at stake to admit the truth now. But he isn’t realizing one more thing: When the investigative committee releases every ounce of its findings, and his name is mentioned, he made a mistake by not admitting the truth and getting out in front of it ahead of time...


The Hermans had an ax to grind only with Zach Smith, as far as I can tell, and had to be shocked beyond belief when Meyer’s role became questioned and he was placed on leave. Smith and Herman, once very close from 2012-14, had a bad falling out since Herman left Ohio State. The wives, however, were very close and remain close.


Still, Michelle Herman told me this Tuesday about Courtney Smith via Messenger:


“She never told me she was being abused. She never told anyone she was being abused. Nobody saw any abuse.”


That, in essence, covered her husband’s responsibility toward his Title IX responsibilities while at Ohio State.


She went on to describe her relationship with Courtney Smith:


“We were close. I am not saying we weren’t close. We just weren’t that close while we were there. I wouldn’t call her my best friend, either.”


So why give her a substantial amount of money in 2017 (three years after the Hermans left Columbus)?


“When she needed to borrow money, she was drowning in debt and going to drop out of school. I said ‘that’s a bad idea. Then what will you do?’ I said, ‘Why don’t you let me loan you the money? I mean, it’s not going to hurt us.’ We loan people money all the time. Sometimes, we just give it to them.”


This also

I have reported that both Courtney Smith’s own mother and her ex-mother-in-law (Zach Smith’s mother) each have labeled her a habitual liar who was executing a pre-planned scheme to take down her ex-husband, and Meyer, himself. She spoke of it often, they said. They also claimed she was the one who committed domestic violence, with first-hand accounts.
*Consistent with their claims, the Powell police department never arrested Zach Smith despite Courtney Smith’s numerous 911 calls. No district attorney in Delaware County ever filed charges.*
Tina Carano, Courtney’s mother, described an incident in which her daughter purposely tried to run over her ex-husband with her car in the summer of 2015 in front of their two children. Zach Smith confirmed this as well. She also said her daughter has a drinking problem and “needs professional help.”
What say you, ESPN?
Crickets.


This column, it does not inspire the confidence in Snook. 

First of all, demanding the retraction via DM and then publicizing it is super weird. Then there is a LOT of ranting about ESPN and Finebaum and "the narrative." Not sure what to make of that. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 19, 2018, 02:20:27 AM
It's true. The timing with the McMurphy piece could have been a coincidence. Or, even if the OSU brass already knew, the McMurphy report could merely have been the thing that brought enough negative PR to force them to act (fire Zach).
No such thing as coincidences like this.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 19, 2018, 12:52:37 PM
Your take is a breath of fresh air and exactly how I feel.
Thanks, sometimes I as an irrational Buckeye fan don't stink the joint up that bad. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 19, 2018, 01:03:34 PM
It's true. The timing with the McMurphy piece could have been a coincidence. Or, even if the OSU brass already knew, the McMurphy report could merely have been the thing that brought enough negative PR to force them to act (fire Zach).
Wouldn't it be more the timing of the McMurphy Piece and the Firing by OSU coincided with the release of the Police report?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 19, 2018, 01:14:30 PM
Urban isn't the bad guy. McMurphy isn't the bad guy. Zach Smith and Zach Smith alone is the bad guy. Just a complete garbage human being. And if it wasn't for McMurphy's reporting, Smith would probably still be employed. The biggest issue people have with Urban is one- how in the hell could he employ such a mediocre coach and monumental scumbag for so long- and two- his lying and his hypocrisy.

Oh and this Jeff Snook character is grasping at straws. First he was saying it was Tom Herman who tipped of McMurphy because of an axe to grind because of recruiting. Then he was saying "Oh I overstated that recruiting angle." He still has yet to provide a single shred of evidence that it was Tom Herman who tipped off McMurphy. And by the way even if it was Tom Herman, who cares? He's not the bad guy in this whole mess either. Zach Smith is.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 19, 2018, 04:51:56 PM
Urban isn't the bad guy. McMurphy isn't the bad guy. Zach Smith and Zach Smith alone is the bad guy. Just a complete garbage human being. And if it wasn't for McMurphy's reporting, Smith would probably still be employed. The biggest issue people have with Urban is one- how in the hell could he employ such a mediocre coach and monumental scumbag for so long- and two- his lying and his hypocrisy.
so, in my book, this makes Urban a bad guy
not as bad as Zach obviously, but bad
bad enuff to be fired??  I don't think so, but I'm not in charge.  But Urban is BAD
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 19, 2018, 06:42:24 PM
This column, it does not inspire the confidence in Snook.

First of all, demanding the retraction via DM and then publicizing it is super weird. Then there is a LOT of ranting about ESPN and Finebaum and "the narrative." Not sure what to make of that.
So BM(couldn't come up with better initials) Finebaum & ESPN get a free pass on speculation but public record from a Police Dept is questionable.Say that out loud and see how it sounds.My apologies if I'm reading that wrong.I'm not on anybody's side but cleaning the slate.Courtney's own mother ratted her out as getting loose with the facts after tossing back a few - and that's being generous.I'm kinda hoping the whole thing goes to court,as I've previously stated.Like to see a changing of the guard at this point and watch courtney fold like a deck chair on the Titanic under scrutiny.BTW they can take Zack out back and disembowel him with a wooden spoon
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 19, 2018, 08:16:15 PM
So BM(couldn't come up with better initials) Finebaum & ESPN get a free pass on speculation but public record from a Police Dept is questionable.Say that out loud and see how it sounds.My apologies if I'm reading that wrong.I'm not on anybody's side but cleaning the slate.Courtney's own mother ratted her out as getting loose with the facts after tossing back a few - and that's being generous.I'm kinda hoping the whole thing goes to court,as I've previously stated.Like to see a changing of the guard at this point and watch courtney fold like a deck chair on the Titanic under scrutiny.BTW they can take Zack out back and disembowel him with a wooden spoon
A. The retraction I was referring to was Snook DMing Herman's wife and demanding he retract his denial of Snook's report on his involvement.
 
B. This thing has gone through a dozen levels of the sports talk industrial complex. Many people have said many things. ESPN is the one people focus on because it's the one that is considered most important and the one everyone is convinced hates their team. Playing to those feelings wins points inside the tribe, but can make those outside it skeptical. In short, calling out "the narrative" doesn't hold Finebaum to account. It just makes it harder to take someone seriously. (Fun story, you know who thinks ESPN hates them, every SEC team's fans)
C. I'm not sure where the police department thing came in. I'm sure Courtney is a mess. I dunno that I'd gain any level of glee if she imploded in a public setting. Whatever floats someone's boat I guess. If it went to court, we might learn more about the inner workings of OSU football, which I somehow don't think comes out the better for that process. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 20, 2018, 08:41:48 AM
You don't know where the Police Dept thing comes in?When the smoke clears they just might have as much to say as who did what - when.If this debacle heads in that direction
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Benthere2 on August 20, 2018, 10:10:07 AM
honest question

If Meyer gets the boot will it really affect tOSU?  I view that program as a top program no mater who is leading it.  At least in the short term.  Obviously recruiting comes into it but PSU weathered the storm of Joe Pa and I imagine tOSU will be fine with or without Meyer
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 20, 2018, 10:22:33 AM
honest question

If Meyer gets the boot will it really affect tOSU?  I view that program as a top program no mater who is leading it.  At least in the short term.  Obviously recruiting comes into it but PSU weathered the storm of Joe Pa and I imagine tOSU will be fine with or without Meyer
We always said that about Michigan too.  Lloyd Carr was viewed as a guy who just didn't mess things up.  I think post-retirement (at least purely as a coach) he's viewed more favorably.
Every helmet schools except Ohio State has gone through a rough patch in the last 30 years.
Notre Dame has finished in the top 10 once in the past 25 years, they've finished below .500 five teams in that span.
Michigan hasn't won or even played for a Big Ten title in 14 years, and has finished unranked in 7 of the past 10 years
From 2000-08 Alabama only finished higher than 3rd in the own division once, and finished unranked in 7 of 9 seasons.
Texas hasn't won or played for a Big XII title in 9 years, finishing ranked just once during that time.
Oklahoma went 13 years without a Big 8/12 title from 1988 until 2000, and and had a 5 years stretch of finishing .500 or worse before hiring Stoops
USC lost at least 5 games every year but 2 from 1990-2001, going to only one Rose Bowl during that stretch, and going 6 straight years finishing unranked.
So is Ohio State better positioned than most to survive losing a great head coach?  Obviously.  But to believe that Ohio State is the lone school immune to bad coaching hires, or that they are the lone school that any coach could win at, seems naive.  If all of those other schools can go through rough patches, OSU can too.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 20, 2018, 10:33:59 AM
honest question

If Meyer gets the boot will it really affect tOSU?  I view that program as a top program no mater who is leading it.  At least in the short term.  Obviously recruiting comes into it but PSU weathered the storm of Joe Pa and I imagine tOSU will be fine with or without Meyer
IMO for at least a season or two as many recruits may back off because of Meyer being gone or the cloud over the program.And like it or not  other programs will negatively recruit it's the nature of that aspect 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 20, 2018, 10:38:33 AM
Every helmet schools except Ohio State has gone through a rough patch in the last 30 years.But to believe that Ohio State is the lone school immune to bad coaching hires, or that they are the lone school that any coach could win at, seems naive.  If all of those other schools can go through rough patches, OSU can too.
SHUSH,trying to put the whammie on us,there was nothing wrong with the last 30 yrs.We even lost a couple of NCG's
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 20, 2018, 11:17:48 AM
You don't know where the Police Dept thing comes in?When the smoke clears they just might have as much to say as who did what - when.If this debacle heads in that direction
Comes in on my Snook comment? No. 
I await the police department spilling everything. I remain skeptical it will happen.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 20, 2018, 03:02:19 PM
Trustees meet 9AM wednesday. Who knows if that is to validate a decision or to come to an agreement on one.

Also, this provided some insight as to why McMurphy released the info he did last Friday. The subordinate admin assistant being moved into a different job is a bit of a new wrinkle. 

https://247sports.com/Article/Ohio-State-Buckeyes-Brett-McMurphy-details-Zach-Smith-sex-findings-Urban-Meyers-outlook-120843516/

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 20, 2018, 04:44:46 PM
Just curious how does anyone know or prove what was sent/mailed to someone's place of employment?Does McMurphy have copies of the invoice.Did the supposed other employee forward info to him?The Night Cleaners?The Trainers?How does that work?

 I mean really does someone have copies/pics?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 20, 2018, 05:30:04 PM
Comes in on my Snook comment? No.
I await the police department spilling everything. I remain skeptical it will happen.
The police department won't spill anything in a media sense, they will spill whatever is relevant to their involvement in any court proceedings, and only with any criminal aspects. If the sex with a co-worker, the sex toy mail package, the photos of whatever, or other use of his cell phone violated any criminal laws, then they could be involved in those matters as well.  Again, if that all happened, and Meyer was not aware, then not an issue to his situation.  IF he addressed, and kept Smith on staff, lowers Meyers character in my opinion, but still not a thing I would fire him over.  As AD, I would set a clear line of expectations for future situations.  IF Meyer knew, and ignored all of it (which I do not think occurred) then out the door he goes as well.  To bring up every little incident, to me is, is meaning less, unless you are trying to really fire the guy, or as a media person, embarrass the program.  I know McMurphy probabaly does not care at this point, because his access to Ohio State Athletics is most likely blacked out. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 20, 2018, 05:31:36 PM
Just curious how does anyone know or prove what was sent/mailed to someone's place of employment?Does McMurphy have copies of the invoice.Did the supposed other employee forward info to him?The Night Cleaners?The Trainers?How does that work?

  "Um excuse me pal would you sign for Coach Smith's package here for a retractable Dildo,two vibrating butt plugs and a 9 oz tube of Eurasion Joy Jelly.Thanks Mack,please consider us for all your future courrier needs"

  I mean really does someone have copies/pics?
Asked the same question to a few other people who where jumping up and down that that alone should be grounds for canning Urban. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 20, 2018, 05:37:42 PM
Just curious how does anyone know or prove what was sent/mailed to someone's place of employment?Does McMurphy have copies of the invoice.Did the supposed other employee forward info to him?The Night Cleaners?The Trainers?How does that work?

 I mean really does someone have copies/pics?
Good question. Two possible answers to me.
1. A scorned admin that signed for the packages, may have gotten an invoice or packaging slip with the packages. Possibly maybe the same scorned AA he is in the pictures or videos with.
2. He and the ex wife shared an Amazon account that she could see orders from.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 20, 2018, 05:46:46 PM
Asked the same question to a few other people who where jumping up and down that that alone should be grounds for canning Urban.  
could be grounds for canning Coach Smith, but even that is a stretch
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 20, 2018, 05:58:16 PM
2. He and the ex wife shared an Amazon account that she could see orders from.

If he's really that fookin' bent he can't land a gig as a Walmart Greeter.What an A-Hole
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 20, 2018, 08:04:12 PM
I was surprised to read it but according to the Columbus Dispatch, anonymous insiders at OSU are predicting this will end in a suspension.
I expected them to lock pretty hard into either (1) there's nothing bad, so Urban's off, no further consequence or (2) ew, that's bad, which would necessarily violate that new clause, so he's fired for cause.
[Dispatch: "Two sources connected to the investigation said the likely recommendation to university President Michael V. Drake is a suspension for Meyer."]
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 20, 2018, 08:58:48 PM
Just curious how does anyone know or prove what was sent/mailed to someone's place of employment?Does McMurphy have copies of the invoice.Did the supposed other employee forward info to him?The Night Cleaners?The Trainers?How does that work?

 I mean really does someone have copies/pics?
Someone shared screenshots of the amazon order confirmations. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 20, 2018, 09:06:49 PM
or it was common knowledge in the football office

multiple witnesses, 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 20, 2018, 10:45:26 PM
Someone shared screenshots of the amazon order confirmations.
Someone?    Order confirmation sheet would be in his name, and the package info would be blank on the outside.  If he was dumb enough to share an account that his wife could access, for toys to be used with other people, then he is a dumbass.  IF they were for he and his wife, and if she shared the invoice, for items they used together,  then she is truly being a vindictive bitch.
 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 20, 2018, 11:33:13 PM
The police department won't spill anything in a media sense, they will spill whatever is relevant to their involvement in any court proceedings, and only with any criminal aspects. If the sex with a co-worker, the sex toy mail package, the photos of whatever, or other use of his cell phone violated any criminal laws, then they could be involved in those matters as well.  Again, if that all happened, and Meyer was not aware, then not an issue to his situation.  IF he addressed, and kept Smith on staff, lowers Meyers character in my opinion, but still not a thing I would fire him over.  As AD, I would set a clear line of expectations for future situations.  IF Meyer knew, and ignored all of it (which I do not think occurred) then out the door he goes as well.  To bring up every little incident, to me is, is meaning less, unless you are trying to really fire the guy, or as a media person, embarrass the program.  I know McMurphy probabaly does not care at this point, because his access to Ohio State Athletics is most likely blacked out.  
Do we think any of those three things would be out there in criminal proceedings? 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 20, 2018, 11:34:12 PM
or it was common knowledge in the football office

multiple witnesses,
Someone shared the screenshots with McMurphy last Friday. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 20, 2018, 11:36:48 PM
Someone?    Order confirmation sheet would be in his name, and the package info would be blank on the outside.  If he was dumb enough to share an account that his wife could access, for toys to be used with other people, then he is a dumbass.  IF they were for he and his wife, and if she shared the invoice, for items they used together,  then she is truly being a vindictive bitch.
  
Here are the pictures. 
https://watchstadium.com/news/zach-smith-sex-toys-ohio-state-offices-staffer-nude-photos-white-house-08-17-2018/
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 21, 2018, 12:13:26 AM
I found that text transcript with Koffel fascinating.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 21, 2018, 01:05:32 AM
Do we think any of those three things would be out there in criminal proceedings?
Yes, it would be, unless the courts sealed the hearings for some reason.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 21, 2018, 01:10:26 AM
Interesting as well, I going to assume (yes, I know the blah blah, and by no means suggest the items were any where close to this) that you have ordered from Amazon.  I have, and allow my 10 year old to order items as well with supervision, and I have never received an open invoice from the USPS/FED EX/UPS guy with that kind of information exposed.  Those screen shots are what you see when you actually order, and email notifications, hence someone provided him with that information; it was not someone from the office, unless they opened the packages, hacked his email account, or shared any account. 

Seems Smith's attorney is not gonna mess around with McMurphy either, and he may want to back off a bit before his skeletons start to fall out of the closet via sources or he finds himself in court. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 21, 2018, 06:45:04 AM
Someone shared the screenshots with McMurphy last Friday.
I don't get it,as I said before if he's that ignorant that he was still sharing an account with his ex then he deserves everything he gets.I'm thinking that Zach  probably did this but in the 1% chance he didn't.....

Edit thanx RD wondering how someone got the invoice which is packed away.Or as you say maybe someone from Amazon or their affiliates.Another thing I was wondering how the hell do you take those type of pictures from inside the White House?I'm sure they have high end cyber-security so the Secret Service definitely had to see something this creepy and I'm sure they would have notified/forwarded tOSU.Even though Willie Nelson got away with puffing on hippy lettuce up on the roof back in the day
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 21, 2018, 06:52:29 AM
Seems Smith's attorney is not gonna mess around with McMurphy either, and he may want to back off a bit before his skeletons start to fall out of the closet via sources or he finds himself in court.  
Sounds like saber ratting.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 21, 2018, 06:53:44 AM
Yes, it would be, unless the courts sealed the hearings for some reason.

And do we think this will actually get to a criminal court? Especially those three things?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 21, 2018, 06:56:53 AM
And do we think this will actually get to a criminal court? Especially those three things?
He is charged criminally with the criminal trespass, but the more explosive hearing will be about the protection order.  I forget the exact standard, but it's more or less he has to have displayed a pattern of activity that make her fear for her safety.  This is a pretty broad standard and opens up a lots of cans of worms for questioning.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 21, 2018, 09:27:14 AM
pattern of activity that make her fear for her safety.  
seems there's evidence of such a pattern
criminal court is the leverage she uses to get the big payday.  Settling out of court for $$$
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 21, 2018, 10:09:06 AM
seems there's evidence of such a pattern
criminal court is the leverage she uses to get the big payday.  Settling out of court for $$$
Maybe...he's charged with criminal trespass, which is a 4th degree misdemeanor and carries a maximum 30 days in jail.  The circumstances are odd, and I'm not sure a judge would be inclined to impose a jail sentence.  In any event, my point is the criminal case is much narrower in scope than the protection order case.  Nearly all of the stuff could come in under the protection order case.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 21, 2018, 10:23:46 AM
yup, besides no one really cares about the Smith's and their crazy relationship

We only care how it will affect Urby's employment

the question remains, was the relationship crazy enough to be potentially dangerous, did Urby know it was this crazy, and what did Urby do with this information if he did know it was out of hand?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hoss on August 21, 2018, 11:10:02 AM
The only question that matters is whether Ohio State is more concerned with the opinion of people outside of Ohio, or those from Ohio...who actually support the program. 

I think we know what the answer to that question is, and it will be confirmed on Thursday when Urban is reinstated. tOSU and Urbs will be pariahs...and will continue to win, and give no shits in the process. 

My suggestion to everybody else is to deal, and move on. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 21, 2018, 11:55:19 AM
I won't have trouble dealing with that.

I didn't think Urban was a great guy before he came to Columbus, this just confirms it a bit.

I won't have trouble dealing with tOSU's decision either.  Urban is who he is.  He was hired to win, not hired to be like Mike Riley.  I don't think he did anything horrible.  Not anymore horrible than he's done all along in his career.

modified to include..........

as long as Urban reported what he knew to the proper people in the athletic department
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 21, 2018, 12:29:57 PM
I won't have trouble dealing with that.

I didn't think Urban was a great guy before he came to Columbus, this just confirms it a bit.

I won't have trouble dealing with tOSU's decision either.  Urban is who he is.  He was hired to win, not hired to be like Mike Riley.  I don't think he did anything horrible.  Not anymore horrible than he's done all along in his career.

modified to include..........

as long as Urban reported what he knew to the proper people in the athletic department
Fearless kinda nails it. He’ll take a different brand of crap than he used to, but that’s about it. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 21, 2018, 12:48:32 PM
I won't have trouble dealing with tOSU's decision either.  Urban is who he is.  He was hired to win, not hired to be like Mike Riley.  I don't think he did anything horrible.  Not anymore horrible than he's done all along in his career.
Agreed. However, I think it will begin to backfire on Urban whenever he steps back into that solemn voice, trying to let us know the better way to live, emphasizing he's the leader who knows the way. And he will do that. Because that's part of his recruiting spiel and way of reflecting on past seasons.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 21, 2018, 01:59:42 PM
I found that text transcript with Koffel fascinating.
yeah after reading that my advice to Zach Smith would be get a new lawyer asap. His lawyer is a clown.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 21, 2018, 02:03:37 PM
Agreed. However, I think it will begin to backfire on Urban whenever he steps back into that solemn voice, trying to let us know the better way to live, emphasizing he's the leader who knows the way. And he will do that. Because that's part of his recruiting spiel and way of reflecting on past seasons.
Urban would take a lot less flak if he would just be honest about who/what he is. Nobody likes a hypocrite. They like people who are real.
Take Mike Leach for instance. Love that dude. He doesn't pretend to be something he's not. He's just himself. Urby is like the Hillary Clinton of football coaches. Authentically inauthentic.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 21, 2018, 02:36:23 PM
yeah after reading that my advice to Zach Smith would be get a new lawyer asap. His lawyer is a clown.
Eh, I think his client is in a corner and Koffel's playing the only cards he has left: (a) be evasive always, (b) keep repeating the same message in case it can get your opponent to back down. It's not effective, but I don't see any spots where another lawyer could easily do better. 
Zach made his bed. All Koffel can do is pray that McMurphy doesn't get another look at it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 21, 2018, 03:27:57 PM
Agreed. However, I think it will begin to backfire on Urban whenever he steps back into that solemn voice, trying to let us know the better way to live, emphasizing he's the leader who knows the way. And he will do that. Because that's part of his recruiting spiel and way of reflecting on past seasons.
and he obviously should catch some flak for his hypocrisy.  Should have all along.... 5 years from now it will have diminished, but hopefully a couple Michigan reporters will keep the memory refreshed
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 21, 2018, 03:31:12 PM
Maybe...he's charged with criminal trespass, which is a 4th degree misdemeanor and carries a maximum 30 days in jail.  The circumstances are odd, and I'm not sure a judge would be inclined to impose a jail sentence.  In any event, my point is the criminal case is much narrower in scope than the protection order case.  Nearly all of the stuff could come in under the protection order case.
And that they are already legally divorced, there is not $$$$$ option from him.  Only chance at that is sell the movie rights, write a book, or go after Ohio State University, Urban Meyer, and whoever else she would like to try and include.  She would probably get something, because that seems to be the way of settlements these days, but not near what people would think. 
The whole legal aspect of those two is perplexing to me.  I have witnessed some strange stuff, and from an outside view, this would be a nightmare for any Police Department. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 21, 2018, 03:34:12 PM
and he obviously should catch some flak for his hypocrisy.  Should have all along.... 5 years from now it will have diminished, but hopefully a couple Michigan reporters will keep the memory refreshed
Hopefully Jimmy Football will get jealous and try to one up Urban!  Problem solved:)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 21, 2018, 04:23:19 PM
and he obviously should catch some flak for his hypocrisy.  Should have all along.... 5 years from now it will have diminished, but hopefully a couple Michigan reporters will keep the memory refreshed
https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/2018-08-20-youre-blind-if-you-dont-question-brett-mcmurphys-motivation/ (https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/2018-08-20-youre-blind-if-you-dont-question-brett-mcmurphys-motivation/)
I don’t know, I think that’s an oversimplification. All these opinions but nobody knows what the investigation found.
I think many people who either live in Ohio or are Buckeye fans feel the same as I do which is- if he did not report what he should have reported or if he enabled somebody he really thought was having the  domestic violence issues then he should be fired.  On the other hand if they find that not only he reported everything but went further and tried to investigate police reports and get both parties versions of what happened, then I don’t think he did anything wrong and should be allowed to go on unpunished.
I think if you look at the type of people he is at least tried to recruit since he came from Florida and the severity with which he has punished people who did cross the line and most importantly if you talk to the families of the players who have come through Ohio State under him and the parents of those people that are there now, I think you’ll find over whelming support after this if he is vindicated.
The radio interview I attached is not an uncommon take as I have been hearing a lot of this     If you’re trying to bury Zack Smith you’re beating a dead horse so why and all this personal stuff that clearly has nothing to do with Myer and whether or not he had or covered for domestic violence    
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 21, 2018, 06:48:45 PM
https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/2018-08-20-youre-blind-if-you-dont-question-brett-mcmurphys-motivation/ (https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/2018-08-20-youre-blind-if-you-dont-question-brett-mcmurphys-motivation/)
I don’t know, I think that’s an oversimplification. All these opinions but nobody knows what the investigation found.
I think many people who either live in Ohio or are Buckeye fans feel the same as I do which is- if he did not report what he should have reported or if he enabled somebody he really thought was having the  domestic violence issues then he should be fired.  
That's close to how I feel. In order to have deserved his job, I think Urban will have had to have reported every instance of rumored abuse and will have had to run a tight ship that doesn't allow an abuser to keep his job and hide.
On the other hand if they find that not only he reported everything but went further and tried to investigate police reports and get both parties versions of what happened, then I don’t think he did anything wrong and should be allowed to go on unpunished. 

One of the hardest questions to answer will always be "So,...why on earth did this guy not only get a job at OSU (he shouldn't have) but keep his job all the while?"
Eventually he was fired for cause, but why on Earth so late?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 21, 2018, 08:45:26 PM
That's close to how I feel. In order to have deserved his job, I think Urban will have had to have reported every instance of rumored abuse and will have had to run a tight ship that doesn't allow an abuser to keep his job and hide.One of the hardest questions to answer will always be "So,...why on earth did this guy not only get a job at OSU (he shouldn't have) but keep his job all the while?"
Eventually he was fired for cause, but why on Earth so late?
Well you heard Meyer say that he found out that 2009, what happened was not what was reported. Must be something to that since Smith got hired at two more schools in between.
I would guess that the marriage turned into a big he said/ she said, with witnesses and police leaning more towards Zach’s version, fair or not.  When he finally was arrested, he was fired.  All that other garbage is clearly stuff Meyer or any coach would never tolerate, so there’s that.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 21, 2018, 08:54:58 PM
Well you heard Meyer say that he found out that 2009, what happened was not what was reported. Must be something to that since Smith got hired at two more schools in between.  
Well, McMurphy was the first to report 2009. So that wasn't common knowledge. Clearly almost all of us missed it. And one sidelight that has become abundantly clear through this process is how skeptical we should be of the quality of some institutions' background checks.
I would guess that the marriage turned into a big he said/ she said, with witnesses and police leaning more towards Zach’s version, fair or not.  When he finally was arrested, he was fired.  All that other garbage is clearly stuff Meyer or any coach would never tolerate, so there’s that.  
The texts from Courtney and her mom corroborate their stories. And the stories about his relationship with staffers, and behavior at OSU and the White House are consistent with the allegations of poor character. It's pretty futile to think anything leans towards Zach's version (if that version is that he was a good guy who never abused her).
Also, if he had been fired as soon as he was arrested, he'd have been released from his position at UF in 2009 and never hired at OSU. Instead, he wasn't fired until his presence looked bad. That his behavior was equally trashy before everyone knew clearly didn't matter. Because he was still there.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 21, 2018, 10:27:20 PM

I don’t know, I think that’s an oversimplification. All these opinions but nobody knows what the investigation found.
I think many people who either live in Ohio or are Buckeye fans feel the same as I do 
the vast majority are not buckeye fans
and even the vast majority of buckeye fans like their simplified opinions
I understand that no matter what comes of this, there will be those that support Urban.
I was referencing the vast majority that have already formed their simple opinion and will haunt Urban the remainder of his career
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 07:32:55 AM
Well, McMurphy was the first to report 2009. So that wasn't common knowledge. Clearly almost all of us missed it. And one sidelight that has become abundantly clear through this process is how skeptical we should be of the quality of some institutions' background checks.The texts from Courtney and her mom corroborate their stories. And the stories about his relationship with staffers, and behavior at OSU and the White House are consistent with the allegations of poor character. It's pretty futile to think anything leans towards Zach's version (if that version is that he was a good guy who never abused her).
Also, if he had been fired as soon as he was arrested, he'd have been released from his position at UF in 2009 and never hired at OSU. Instead, he wasn't fired until his presence looked bad. That his behavior was equally trashy before everyone knew clearly didn't matter. Because he was still there.
Who cares if 2009 was common knowledge. If, as Urban says, proper reporting and protocol were followed, and, as he says, what was reported is different from what happened.  2009 has nothing to do with it, if you think it was a one time/ first time incident- as he indicated everyone believed.
Courtney’s mom,s current and up to date take do NOT corroborate Courtney’s take.   The texts from back then do, but how do we know those were not just spur of the moment emotional reactions- changed now that her mom has witnessed real situations ( as she says) were Zach was more trying to escape when she was drunk, and was the aggressor.
Lastly- nobody is claiming Zack is not a bad character.  Tim May went on Finebaum yesterday and clearly stated OSU was in the process of terminating Zach before McMurphy’s report came out, and also that the investigation already knew about the sex toys and affair with an OSU employee before McMurphy put that out.
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95485/columbus-dispatchs-tim-may-tells-paul-finebaum-he-wouldnt-be-surprised-if-urban-meyer-was-back-with-the-team-by (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95485/columbus-dispatchs-tim-may-tells-paul-finebaum-he-wouldnt-be-surprised-if-urban-meyer-was-back-with-the-team-by)   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 07:36:56 AM
Well, McMurphy was the first to report 2009. So that wasn't common knowledge. Clearly almost all of us missed it. And one sidelight that has become abundantly clear through this process is how skeptical we should be of the quality of some institutions' background checks.The texts from Courtney and her mom corroborate their stories. And the stories about his relationship with staffers, and behavior at OSU and the White House are consistent with the allegations of poor character. It's pretty futile to think anything leans towards Zach's version (if that version is that he was a good guy who never abused her).
Also, if he had been fired as soon as he was arrested, he'd have been released from his position at UF in 2009 and never hired at OSU. Instead, he wasn't fired until his presence looked bad. That his behavior was equally trashy before everyone knew clearly didn't matter. Because he was still there.
If people who get arrested never get to be coaches, Michigan would have a different coach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 07:40:44 AM
the vast majority are not buckeye fans
and even the vast majority of buckeye fans like their simplified opinions
I understand that no matter what comes of this, there will be those that support Urban.
I was referencing the vast majority that have already formed their simple opinion and will haunt Urban the remainder of his career
I will not support him if he covered up, or lied, or failed to follow up as required. Period.
But if he did all of those things, I also will not hold any of this against him, as I think the Outrage is misplaced, and only directed at him for either bigger public issues or those who hate him because he wins.
The facts will be public- so let’s see what they are.  Then we can all weigh in from an informed point of view instead of all of this questionable drama.  
It is just like Tressel- 90% of what was reported was blatantly false. People piled on, stories of free cars and players involved that never were.  Just fake outrage.we were talking about teenagers trading in items they OWNED for DISCOUNTS on tattoos.
I defended
Tressel until it was revealed he lied to the NCAA.   I immmediately wanted him fired.
Let’s see what this investigation team has to say. It is an  impressive  array of highly accomplished people.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 22, 2018, 07:59:26 AM
If they fire Urban they'll need to fire everyone on his staff who's wives knew, no?  And maybe euthanize their pets too for good measure.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 22, 2018, 08:14:57 AM
So here’s a question. Let’s assume this goes the way we think. Within a few days, Urban is back coaching OSU. Will we feel the system worked?

Urban will have lost time with the team, but the actual punishment will be minimal. The university will have taken its time, made its judgement. Maybe there’s a great dunping of positive OSU evidence, though it’ll probably take some good questions to media to bring that out. Maybe not.

I guess at the end, will those inside the OSU camp see it as a virulent question coming up and being dealt with, or as an injustice of sorts that it happened at all? And those more prone to be skeptical of OSU, will there be a sense of closure in the right process having been completed?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 09:18:35 AM
It is just like Tressel- 90% of what was reported was blatantly false. People piled on, stories of free cars and players involved that never were.  Just fake outrage.we were talking about teenagers trading in items they OWNED for DISCOUNTS on tattoos.
I defended Tressel until it was revealed he lied to the NCAA.   I immmediately wanted him fired.
Exactly I remember Bama Buckeye and myself seething at Tress for lying about something so trivial - but then he starts talking to the fans/general public like we were clueless rubes.Any sympathy for him then/there swirled the drain with the faithful.JMO - in many aspects that's why i don't like UFM sure he's successful but he'll look into the camera and say things for affect not accuracy
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 09:32:09 AM
If people who get arrested never get to be coaches, Michigan would have a different coach.
And a different Asst.Athletic Director :dink:
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 09:39:21 AM
How old are Courtney & Zach Smith's children.I can't imagine if they are school age they won't get this skeleton dragged out in front of them.I really.really hope/pray not - no kid should put up with that
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 22, 2018, 09:44:06 AM
How old are Courtney & Zach Smith's children.I can't imagine if they are school age they won't get this skeleton dragged out in front of them.I really.really hope/pray not - no kid should put up with that
They are 8 and 6. It is too easy to find that. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 09:54:29 AM
Absolutely smashing BAB - you get a cookie

here is an Attorney's take on this shitstorm

ttps://www.reddit.com/r/OhioStateFootball/comments/99asso/a_lawyers_deep_dive_part_iii_how_brett_mcmurphys/

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 22, 2018, 10:30:41 AM
Nice read Nubbzzzzzzz
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 22, 2018, 11:11:30 AM
Regardless of the opinions on McMurphy I think it is clear that either Urban was blind or felt he needed to be loyal to Smith because of his grandfather.... OR....  Urbs is a hypocrite when it comes to behavior (meaning he has different rules for different people).   This, imo, should be the debate.

Anyone thinking Smith should still be coaching or McMurphy targeted OSU is wrong.   Smith is scum.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 22, 2018, 11:13:53 AM
So here’s a question. Let’s assume this goes the way we think. Within a few days, Urban is back coaching OSU. Will we feel the system worked?

Urban will have lost time with the team, but the actual punishment will be minimal. The university will have taken its time, made its judgement. Maybe there’s a great dunping of positive OSU evidence, though it’ll probably take some good questions to media to bring that out. Maybe not.

I guess at the end, will those inside the OSU camp see it as a virulent question coming up and being dealt with, or as an injustice of sorts that it happened at all? And those more prone to be skeptical of OSU, will there be a sense of closure in the right process having been completed?
I'm expecting some type of fine that becomes a donation.  I think there will be some promises going forward and new "policies".   I'm not sure what would be justice here as I don't see a clear answer. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 11:17:39 AM
I bet most of the discussion is about how to save face for OSU here.

I don't think that can be done, so perhaps they should just do whatever is right.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 11:39:57 AM
If people who get arrested never get to be coaches, Michigan would have a different coach.
Sure, if, then that. But that wasn't my if. Tolerating a serial abuser was my if.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 11:43:08 AM
Who cares if 2009 was common knowledge. If, as Urban says, proper reporting and protocol were followed, and, as he says, what was reported is different from what happened.  2009 has nothing to do with it, if you think it was a one time/ first time incident- as he indicated everyone believed.
 
Even in that case, it stops being a one-time/first-time incident as soon as more rumors pop up. And even if those new rumors are not substantiated, the 2009 event was serious enough that any good "zero tolerance for serial abuse" policy would fire him after the first post-2009 rumor. Instead, it required umpteen post-2009 rumors. Oh, **and** for it to go public and look really/super bad.
At this point, we should have very little faith that Zach Smith would have been fired even if the negative PR stain hadn't become intolerable for OSU.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 11:50:06 AM
Courtney’s mom,s current and up to date take do NOT corroborate Courtney’s take.   The texts from back then do, but how do we know those were not just spur of the moment emotional reactions- changed now that her mom has witnessed real situations ( as she says) were Zach was more trying to escape when she was drunk, and was the aggressor.
Lastly- nobody is claiming Zack is not a bad character.  Tim May went on Finebaum yesterday and clearly stated OSU was in the process of terminating Zach before McMurphy’s report came out, and also that the investigation already knew about the sex toys and affair with an OSU employee before McMurphy put that out.
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95485/columbus-dispatchs-tim-may-tells-paul-finebaum-he-wouldnt-be-surprised-if-urban-meyer-was-back-with-the-team-by (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95485/columbus-dispatchs-tim-may-tells-paul-finebaum-he-wouldnt-be-surprised-if-urban-meyer-was-back-with-the-team-by)  
All I said was that the texts corroborate the events. The ones from Courtney's mom establish that the mom believed Zach was a serial abuser. Full stop. The ones from Courtney are consistent with both she believing Zach is a serial abuser and he is essentially agreeing (certainly not denying). Full stop. Of course, none of these parties knew their texts would later become evidence. But I didn't call them proof. I called them corroborative. 
They are a piece of documentation consistent with all the most negative narratives about Zach.
You are trying surprisingly hard to make it seem Zach Smith was not a good guy and not an awful guy but a juuuuust good enough guy to definitely deserve his job. When talking with people outside of Ohio (and, for obvious reasons, let's exclude Michigan), that's going to be lonely for you.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 11:51:42 AM
I will not support him if he covered up, or lied, or failed to follow up as required. Period..
You forgot "Or if Urban Meyer's leadership permitted an environment in which a serial abuser could hide, be tolerated, or thrive." That one activates even if Meyer (unbelievably) never knew a thing. Because it's the boss's job to build a better environment than that.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 11:53:53 AM
So here’s a question. Let’s assume this goes the way we think. Within a few days, Urban is back coaching OSU. Will we feel the system worked?

Urban will have lost time with the team, but the actual punishment will be minimal. The university will have taken its time, made its judgement. Maybe there’s a great dunping of positive OSU evidence, though it’ll probably take some good questions to media to bring that out. Maybe not.

I guess at the end, will those inside the OSU camp see it as a virulent question coming up and being dealt with, or as an injustice of sorts that it happened at all? And those more prone to be skeptical of OSU, will there be a sense of closure in the right process having been completed?
It's, capital T, The question. I have to imagine it all depends on the report we see. Was the investigation exhaustive and logical? And what did it turn up that we don't already know?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 11:55:33 AM
Even it that case, it stops being a one-time/first-time incident as soon as more rumors pop up. And even if those new rumors are not substantiated, the 2009 event was serious enough that any good "zero tolerance for serial abuse" policy would fire him after the first post-2009 rumor. Instead, it require umpteen post-2009 rumors. Oh, **and** for it to go public.
At this point, we should have very little faith that Zach Smith would have been fired even if the negative PR stain hadn't become intolerable for OSU.
I think that's pretty speculative.  While I have never been a fan of Zach Smith, it isn't rare for organizations to take a closer look at things (1) when legal events occur (like arrests or charges) or (2) when the media is digging around.  Things became legal this year, and the media dug around this year, and voila he's fired.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 11:57:54 AM
At this point IMO it may be well for UFM to weather the storm.However Zach's appalling stench will hang over the program and that is directly traceable to Meyer like it or not.I'd like for Meyer to exercise a buyout or simply step down.Because of his own arrogant oversight media days turned into a PR nightmare.He never had a prepared statement or was he prepared - at 6 million per he's paid to do so. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 12:00:29 PM
C'est la vie on whatever decision they make about Urban today.

What seems most important though is that the B.O.T and President get funding for a quick paint job in the football offices. A couple buckets of white paint should do. 

:57:

(https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DjhYmqmXoAEqTy0.jpg:large)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 12:02:35 PM
I am doubting that mural gets painted over or changed.
I'm more confident that, during Michigan week, the center letter of women gets a giant red X placed across it.
Which is nice.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 12:04:50 PM
All I said was that the texts corroborate the events. The ones from Courtney's mom establish that the mom believed Zach was a serial abuser. Full stop. The ones from Courtney are consistent with both she believing Zach is a serial abuser and he is essentially agreeing (certainly not denying). Full stop. Of course, none of these parties knew their texts would later become evidence. But I didn't call them proof. I called them corroborative.
They are a piece of documentation consistent with all the most negative narratives about Zach.
You are trying surprisingly hard to make it seem Zach Smith was not a good guy and not an awful guy but a juuuuust good enough guy to definitely deserve his job. When talking with people outside of Ohio (and, for obvious reasons, let's exclude Michigan), that's going to be lonely for you.
Courtney’s mom’s most recent  take, given her now full knowledge of the entire situation is not corroborating her daughters story. Stop 
 Your take on my position is exactly the opposite of correct. I have acknowledged that Zach is a scumbag. The real question is related to his boss, how much he knew, what he did about what he knew, and what is realistic to expect for him to control as far as the environment. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 12:06:35 PM
I think that's pretty speculative.  While I have never been a fan of Zach Smith, it isn't rare for organizations to take a closer look at things (1) when legal events occur (like arrests or charges) or (2) when the media is digging around.  Things became legal this year, and the media dug around this year, and voila he's fired.
It's true, my sentence ("At this point, we should have very little faith that Zach Smith would have been fired even if the negative PR stain hadn't become intolerable for OSU.") was speculative. I never meant to hide that. 
The crux of that post, however, was that if Urban (1) knew about 2009 and (2,3,4,5,...?) knew about successive rumors, even if unsubstantiated, he had plenty of grounds to terminate Zach. And we've learned that he did know about 2009 and those rumors. But Zach stayed safe. That part isn't speculative.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 12:11:40 PM
Courtney’s mom’s most recent  take, given her now full knowledge of the entire situation is not corroborating her daughters story. Stop
 Your take on my position is exactly the opposite of correct. I have acknowledged that Zach is a scumbag. The real question is related to his boss, how much he knew, what he did about what he knew, and what is realistic to expect for him to control as far as the environment.
Her mom and her daughter are now estranged. We should doubt her recent (since the estrangement) ad libbed takes more than her pre-estrangement) and documented ones. And that's beside the fact that it's a documented conversation with Zach ... that reads in the particularly damning way it does.
You say Zach is a scumbag. But you also say he tooootally deserved his job from 2012 until precisely the end of July 2018. That is equivalent to saying "He's not a good guy, he's not total garbage, he had been juuuuust good enough to deserve his job." 
You think he definitely deserved the job in 2012 (despite allegations that he not only was a documented serial abuser, but also a very bad football coach). You think he definitely deserved the job in 2015, despite those whirlwind allegations. You also seem to think he deserved his job despite flopping his penis about in the White House and having an inappropriate relationship with an OSU staffer who was ultimately relocated. You think he deserved to get this job and then keep it for a very long time.
Also, the real questions for Meyer aren't just about what he knew. He also has to answer for the environment he built, where - even if he didn't know - Zach was able to thrive out in the open and everyone else (ask Ramzy) knew.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 12:16:16 PM
Her mom and her daughter are now estranged. We should doubt her recent (since the estrangement) ad libbed takes more than her pre-estrangement) and documented ones. 
I don't know about that.  My read is that they are estranged because of her takes on the supposed abuse.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 12:18:49 PM
I don't know about that.  My read is that they are estranged because of her takes on the supposed abuse.
I don't know their family. I doubt most people do. But I find that inconsistent with normal human goings-on. You're saying that a mother who is documented expressing the belief that her daughter's husband is assaulting her daughter ... stopped talking to her daughter because her daughter believed her husband was assaulting her.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 12:20:40 PM
I don't know their family. I doubt most people do. But I find it inconsistent with normal human goings-on for a mother who is documented to believed her daughter's husband is assaulting her daughter to stop talking to her daughter because her daughter believes her husband is assaulting her.
I think it's wacky too.  Which is why I'm not going to hang Urban on the rack because he can't figure out a situation that no one else can figure out.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 12:22:09 PM
I am not betting it's wacky. I am betting it's untrue. This could be a bad bet. But it doesn't feel like a bad bet.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 12:24:00 PM
Urban is on the rack primarily for the environment he built, one where everyone else knew about these rumors of serial assault, the alcoholism, the lewdness, and - whether Urban was aware of those rumors or not - Zach was safe to hide and thrive.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 12:30:14 PM
I don't know about that.  My read is that they are estranged because of her takes on the supposed abuse.
Supposedly they are estranged because of her daughters alcohol problems and emotional outbursts.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 12:30:31 PM
Earle Bruce should be glad he wasn't around to witness this circus within his family. Albeit, his passing may have spurred the current events. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 12:33:04 PM
Urban is on the rack primarily for the environment he built, one where everyone else knew about these rumors of serial assault, the alcoholism, the lewdness, and - whether Urban was aware of those rumors or not - Zach was safe to hide and thrive.
Yeah, but some of these problems are not like the others.  It's not illegal or even immoral to be an alcoholic or take selfies.  The only issue that, to me, is of any importance is about the abuse.  I have not been a fan of how all of these issues get rolled into one, as if they are all of equal importance.  They are not.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 12:34:42 PM
Urban is on the rack primarily for the environment he built, one where everyone else knew about these rumors of serial assault, the alcoholism, the lewdness, and - whether Urban was aware of those rumors or not - Zach was safe to hide and thrive.
As usual-you are making a lot of assumptions.  How do you know what everyone knew?  
It has already been reported that OSU had learned of these things and was in the process of terminating Smith.   Something easy to validate.  
Or, your assumptions could prove accurate- in which case I woul agree- and would agree with holding Meyer accountable.  
But if you believe Saban or Harbaugh know everything about the personal lives of everyone on their staff- I would suggest you are quite naive.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 12:37:51 PM
Supposedly they are estranged because of her daughters alcohol problems and emotional outbursts.  
Objection: Bucknuts message board conjecture, your honor.
If we are hitting a number of journalist's credibility on this one, I believe we can do the same for the anonymous basement-dwelling rube's rumors about the ex-wife.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 12:39:53 PM
I don't know their family. I doubt most people do. But I find that inconsistent with normal human goings-on. 
There's a lot of things said in the last few pages, but I find this humorously accurate. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 12:48:41 PM
Objection: Bucknuts message board conjecture, your honor.
If we are hitting a number of journalist's credibility on this one, I believe we can do the same for the anonymous basement-dwelling rube's rumors about the ex-wife.
She said that in her radio interview.   Point blank asked. This is what she said. I have never been on Bucknuts.  The interview was with 97.1 in Cleveland.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 01:05:59 PM
Supposedly they are estranged because of her daughters alcohol problems and emotional outbursts.  
You need a better place for your crowbar. It's not a good look to keep piling on Courtney. Not just because it's unbecoming to pile on a victim but especially because she can be the most batshit crazy woman in Ohio and Zach would still have deserved to have been fired years ago. So you look bad piling on her AND doing so is not germane.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 01:08:06 PM
She said that in her radio interview.   Point blank asked. This is what she said. I have never been on Bucknuts.  The interview was with 97.1 in Cleveland.  
Wait. Why are you in Cleveland?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 01:11:24 PM
Yeah, but some of these problems are not like the others.  It's not illegal or even immoral to be an alcoholic or take selfies.  The only issue that, to me, is of any importance is about the abuse.  I have not been a fan of how all of these issues get rolled into one, as if they are all of equal importance.  They are not.
They are separate but deserve to be stacked when the topic of deserving a job arises.
Serial assault of a woman is grounds for firing.
Inappropriate relationships with subordinates is grounds for firing.
Genitalia selfies are grounds for firing.
Chronic alcoholics may not break the law but often deserve to be fired. Of course, Zach's alcoholism did break the law (DUI). He was also bad at coaching football, which may or may not be connected to his alcoholism but would deserve firing either way.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 01:14:08 PM
As usual-you are making a lot of assumptions.  How do you know what everyone knew?  
It has already been reported that OSU had learned of these things and was in the process of terminating Smith.   Something easy to validate.  
Or, your assumptions could prove accurate- in which case I woul agree- and would agree with holding Meyer accountable.  
But if you believe Saban or Harbaugh know everything about the personal lives of everyone on their staff- I would suggest you are quite naive.
Well among other reasons, because the owner and author of the most popular buckeye site on the web (Ramzy) said it explicitly.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 01:14:12 PM
You need a better place for your crowbar. It's not a good look to keep piling on Courtney. Not just because it's unbecoming to pile on a victim but especially because she can be the most batshit crazy woman in Ohio and Zach would still have deserved to have been fired years ago. So you look bad piling on her AND doing so is not germane.
The mom said she saw Courtney try to run him over with a car.  Which would make him a victim, too.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 01:21:45 PM
The mom said she saw Courtney try to run him over with a car.  Which would make him a victim, too.
That's not relevant to his job status. Even if she attacked him one or plural times, he didn't have license to serially assault her. Even if she acted criminally, Zach did enough to long ago lose his job. Which is all that is germane to Urban. Why did he get his job in 2012 or keep it, at the very latest, after the assault allegations of 2015?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 01:31:04 PM
That's not relevant to his job status. Even if she attacked him one or plural times, he didn't have license to serially assault her. Even if she acted criminally, Zach did enough to long ago lose his job. Which is all that is germane to Urban. Why did he get his job in 2012 or keep it, at the very latest, after the assault allegations of 2015?
We'll find out soon, but if I had to guess it was because both the police and domestic court looked at the situation but did nothing, leaving OSU with little info to come to any sort of conclusion.  Plus they had split up, which was a very good and important thing.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 01:34:53 PM
We'll find out soon, but if I had to guess it was because both the police and domestic court looked at the situation but did nothing, leaving OSU with little info to come to any sort of conclusion.  Plus they had split up, which was a very good and important thing.
That's the criminal burden of proof. Unlike the justice system, Urban was beholden to also be gravely concerned of new rumors. Further, even if he never heard other rumors, he is solely responsible for the environment he created. And if he never knew anything, but many other did, and a serial assaulter was permitted to hide and thrive as one of Urban's subordinates ... that's on Meyer, too.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 01:35:08 PM
You need a better place for your crowbar. It's not a good look to keep piling on Courtney. Not just because it's unbecoming to pile on a victim but especially because she can be the most batshit crazy woman in Ohio and Zach would still have deserved to have been fired years ago. So you look bad piling on her AND doing so is not germane.
Your lack of objectivity is ver unbecoming and not like you.    
Fact: Courtney claims she was abused 
fact:  her own mother says she was not, and she made it clear she would bring Urban down
Fact: Zach mom gives eyewitness accounts of Courtney getting drunk and starting physical altercations, and even trying to run him over
Fact: police never found a reason to arrest him, until the trespassing. 
Fact: Urban claims to have followed procedures- and that will be validated or disputed when the results of the investigation are revealed.  
It is only you in this debate who has the arrogance to say what you just said.  You heard the side of the story that is most appealing for the world you desire. 
Just because a person claims to be a victim does not mean they are, or that they are being honest.  
But you choose to take it as gospel, and completely rationalize away any other versions of what happened.  
I doubt anyone here is buying your fake outrage at me, nor does any person who has read my opinion think I am piling on the victim.   

All I have been trying to point out is: let’s see what the investigation uncovers.  

I am not assuming anything. I am simply saying there are several real possibilities besides the ONE you insist on— the one that says he beat her routinely, anyone who says otherwise is lying, Urban knew it and covered it up, and he created the environment that allowed Smith to act like a POS.  
So please- don’t give your self righteous and flippant comments.   It might work in politics but I am not buying it.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 01:39:35 PM
That's the criminal burden of proof. Unlike the justice system, Urban was beholden to also be gravely concerned of new rumors. Further, even if he never heard other rumors, he is solely responsible for the environment he created. And if he never knew anything, but many other did, and a serial assaulter was permitted to hide and thrive as one of Urban's subordinates ... that's on Meyer, too.
Domestic court does not have the responsibility of criminal burden of proof.  Further, they have to conclude he was a serial abuser.  Have there been such claims?  To my knowledge no one has talked to any of his other intimate partners about the issue, and no reports have been made about him by anyone else.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 02:11:18 PM
Fact: Courtney claims she was abused
No one doubts.
fact:  her own mother says she was not, and she made it clear she would bring Urban down
You conveniently ignore that she earlier DOCUMENTED in text messages that he did abuse Courtney and was happy to reveal those to a journalist *after* she made contrary claims to Snook (the least credible journalist involved).
Fact: Zach mom gives eyewitness accounts of Courtney getting drunk and starting physical altercations, and even trying to run him over
Let's have me accept that as true. Even then, it's in zero way germane to Urban and whether Zach deserved his job. As mentioned, Courtney could in theory be the most batshit crazy lady in Ohio and also be a victim of serial abuse and Zach, for that alone, will have not deserved his job. Whether she's crazy and even did illegal things of her own, therefore, is not an important data point.
It's a pure distraction tactic.

Fact: police never found a reason to arrest him, until the trespassing.
Excluding 2009 and his DUI, that's true. But it's again irrelevant. After 2009, Urban's responsibilities had a lower burden of proof. He had to care about all rumors. He also had responsibility to build an environment in which, especially when "everybody knew" (Ramzy), to not hide a serial abuser and permit such a subordinate to thrive.
It is only you in this debate who has the arrogance to say what you just said.  You heard the side of the story that is most appealing for the world you desire.
Come on, irony.
Just because a person claims to be a victim does not mean they are, or that they are being honest.  
But you choose to take it as gospel, and completely rationalize away any other versions of what happened.  
Again, you conveniently continue to sidestep what the owner/creator and lead author of the most popular buckeye website has said:

"Literally everybody knew. I knew. I wrote around it for six years."


I doubt anyone here is buying your fake outrage at me, nor does any person who has read my opinion think I am piling on the victim.  
Fake? Huh?
Outrage? Huh?
Self-righteous? On this topic? I figured I'd been pretty calm. Even spent overmany posts railing on the ills of PC culture in this discussion's offing.
Flippant? Ah, well, yeah that one could deffffinitely be me.
Anyway: If that's how you feel, there's not much I can do for you pal. Whether you want to engage is your call.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 02:13:02 PM
It sounds like we may not get an answer today. A delay is more intriguing than an insta-answer. Seems like a debate is in progress.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 02:29:26 PM
Meanwhile, it had somewhatr surprised me why Zach was so supportive of Meyer through the deliberations. What I hadn't considered is how he might hope to sue for unlawful termination if and only if Urban is reinstated without punishment. What a world if that lawsuit occurs and succeeds.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 02:51:58 PM
Where would Zach Smith go to find a jury that would give him favorable/impartial reference?Michigan?Not that Urbz would find anything impartial one way or another.Smith would have to be the farther out of it than Capt.Kirk to even think about it
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 02:59:39 PM
Where would Zach Smith go to find a jury that would give him favorable/impartial reference?Michigan?Not that Urbz would find anything impartial one way or another.Smith would have to be the farther out of it than Capt.Kirk to even think about it
You think Michigan is the place where Zach would get the *best* shot? I'd predict he'd get the best shot in Ohio. Though this wouldn't be a criminal thing with a jury, so that's not relevant. His argument would be that this is a he-said/she-said and his boss forced him out under duress of a phony investigation and that because this boss was never punished, the duress was undue, and the firing unjust. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on August 22, 2018, 03:01:49 PM
Her mom and her daughter are now estranged. We should doubt her recent (since the estrangement) ad libbed takes more than her pre-estrangement) and documented ones. And that's beside the fact that it's a documented conversation with Zach ... that reads in the particularly damning way it does.
You say Zach is a scumbag. But you also say he tooootally deserved his job from 2012 until precisely the end of July 2018. That is equivalent to saying "He's not a good guy, he's not total garbage, he had been juuuuust good enough to deserve his job."
You think he definitely deserved the job in 2012 (despite allegations that he not only was a documented serial abuser, but also a very bad football coach). You think he definitely deserved the job in 2015, despite those whirlwind allegations. You also seem to think he deserved his job despite flopping his penis about in the White House and having an inappropriate relationship with an OSU staffer who was ultimately relocated. You think he deserved to get this job and then keep it for a very long time.
Also, the real questions for Meyer aren't just about what he knew. He also has to answer for the environment he built, where - even if he didn't know - Zach was able to thrive out in the open and everyone else (ask Ramzy) knew.
Let me get this clear. so one incident in 2009 and nothing else as far as we know to 2012. Now qualifies as a "SERIAL" abuser. So he shouldn't have been hired in 2012. At least if you are going to speculate on the truth, get the speculation to line up with known facts. 
We can talk about 2015, maybe he should have been fired. Should he have been fired it the truth is what his and her mothers said, that all he did was move her out of the way to get out of the house. That the police didn't have a probably cause to arrest either one of them. 
They are separate but deserve to be stacked when the topic of deserving a job arises.
Serial assault of a woman is grounds for firing.
Inappropriate relationships with subordinates is grounds for firing.
Genitalia selfies are grounds for firing.
Chronic alcoholics may not break the law but often deserve to be fired. Of course, Zach's alcoholism did break the law (DUI). He was also bad at coaching football, which may or may not be connected to his alcoholism but would deserve firing either way.
Serial assault of a woman - Yes, but we have a he said, she said with the police deciding no charges with her mother siding with him.
Inappropriate relationship - Yes, but do we know that Urban knews about it. We have had affairs at my work where the hire ups know nothing about it. It has nothing to do with the "environment" created by them, it is a matter of you cannot know everything that is going on.
Genitalia pictures on the ground - Yes, but again do we know that Urban knew about it.
You want to give Urban omnipotence as to what happens at all time within the walls of Ohio State. That is beyond ridiculous. Humans are humans they will do what they want and hide it the best they can. I am not sure where you work, but I can tell you in my 40 years in the workforce, things happen that are unacceptable all the time, but the higher ups are unaware and it is nothing to do that they intentionally have a blind eye.    
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 03:03:01 PM
OYou are simply ignoring the possibility that Meyer looked further into it every time accusations were made, reported them, discussed them and it was a continual struggle for anyone at OSU to know what was real.   If eyewitness accounts, or lack of them, or police saying it’s the boy who cried Wolf- then maybe you think the solution is easy, but it may not be so simple.  

Having, at one time, 790 people in 14 states reporting to me( thru 45 managers an 4 division managers) I can tell you, the act of terminating anyone without clear and specific cause is often not only extremely difficult- it can lead to serious liability. 

You are convinced cause was clear here and state it line fact.    Sorry/ you aren’t god.  Some of the conversation- which is the evidence- gives the appearance that there was anything but clarity here AND OSU Tried to gain more clarity. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 03:06:10 PM
If I keep typing that Urban should get off scot-free **if** he reported even every *rumor* and didn't build an environment to hide and thrive serial abusers, then I'm explicitly not ignoring that possibility. I never concluded anything. I just think, given the text messages where two people tell Zach he is an abuser and Zach agrees, that the odds that Urban reported every rumor and did not (accidentally) build a toxic environment are unlikely.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 03:14:20 PM
I also think that (whether it was continually rumored assault, genitalia selfies, DUI, sexual relationship with a subordinate, being bad at coaching football, etc.), that Zach should have been discovered and fired long before July 2018.
Those are close to my only takes. Well, those, plus acknowledgement that even the internets most famous buckeye author, Ramzy, says yeah... "Everybody knew. I knew. I wrote around it for six years."
This conversation between us hasn't developed beyond those few points. I get it. You disagree with the probabilities attached to my interpretation of the evidence and you disagree with my take of Urban's responsibilities. So we keep going around in a tight circle.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 03:16:28 PM
You think Michigan is the place where Zach would get the *best* shot? I'd predict he'd get the best shot in Ohio. Though this wouldn't be a criminal thing with a jury, so that's not relevant. His argument would be that this is a he-said/she-said and his boss forced him out under duress of a phony investigation and that because this boss was never punished, the duress was undue, and the firing unjust.
So now you're making Urban's case for him?That's the problem he really couldn't have fired him when Law enforcement made no arrests.Not w/o a law suit anyway,what happened in 2009 is a mess. Courtney absolutely lied about Earle Bruce,he never drove down there to talk her out of charges/divorce.Earle's daughter(Zach's mother) did,Earle supposedly did go but visited with Urban.If Urban knew all that then send him packing
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 03:18:22 PM
So now you're making Urban's case for him?That's the problem he really couldn't have fired him when Law enforcement made no arrests.Not w/o a law suit anyway,what happened in 2009 is a mess. Courtney absolutely lied about Earle Bruce,he never drove down there to talk her out of charges/divorce.Earle's daughter(Zach's mother) did,Earle supposedly did go but visited with Urban
I think it's clear that I don't think that case is trustworthy. But it's easy to assemble the arguments on either side of this. People, for all their complexities, are usually predictable. Especially when it comes to spin.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 03:21:13 PM
Let me get this clear. so one incident in 2009 and nothing else as far as we know to 2012. Now qualifies as a "SERIAL" abuser.    
Yes. Plural instances of domestic violence qualifies as serial assault. Therefore, after 2009, every new rumor added into a picture against Zach of alleged serial assault.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 03:44:38 PM
Yes. Plural instances of domestic violence qualifies as serial assault. Therefore, after 2009, every new rumor added into a picture against Zach of alleged serial assault.

It so easy to not take you seriously right now.  
Now if you mean to say- the evidence will show that etc etc etc
But that’s not what your Saying. Your stretching to make very large leaps and assumptions and being inflammatory about it.  
I find you not credible.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 03:50:13 PM
Go back and notice the word "alleged." If you did notice it but didn't care, then ... neat for you.
To be accused of multiple instances (rumors) of domestic violence is to allegedly be a serial abuser. There's plenty in this conversation that is up for debate. But if someone debates this one, that person is disagreeing with dictionaries.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 03:55:45 PM
al·leged
əˈlejd/
adjective

as·sault
əˈsôlt/
verb


se·ri·al
ˈsirēəl/
adjective


se·ries
ˈsirēz/
noun

num·ber
ˈnəmbər/
noun

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 04:04:19 PM
Go back and notice the word "alleged." If you did notice it but didn't care, then ... neat for you.
To be accused of multiple instances (rumors) of domestic violence is to allegedly be a serial abuser. There's plenty in this conversation that is up for debate. But if someone debates this one, that person is disagreeing with dictionaries.
You did edit it a minute after posting - just saying
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 04:07:56 PM
That's fair. I usually edit for grammar, but may have added that word for better honesty. If HB read a version without that word and now thinks that "alleged" being in that sentence makes it true, then I guess we're all good.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 04:11:31 PM


Having, at one time, 790 people in 14 states reporting to me( thru 45 managers an 4 division managers) I can tell you, the act of terminating anyone without clear and specific cause is often not only extremely difficult- it can lead to serious liability.

You are certainly not wrong. Even in Ohio, being an at-will state, it has been incredibly difficult to terminate employees at times. It's not as cut and dry as many would like to think. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 22, 2018, 04:25:59 PM
Yes. Plural instances of domestic violence qualifies as serial assault. Therefore, after 2009, every new rumor added into a picture against Zach of alleged serial assault.

You have mentioned alleged, and even provided a definition of the word, but it seems in your view he is guilty of everything.  I am going guess that Meyer does not share your view point, hence one of the many reasons why he did not get rid of the guy prior.  In my background, I have worked with many people who should not have been where they were position wise, yet remained until something finally happened to remove them-be it retirement, or transfer or termination.  That is what I read into this employment situation, not that Meyer turned a blind eye or built an environment that allowed this to occur. 
The media and people in general are lumping this whole situation into one simple issue and it is not one simple issue.  Smith, like it or not, in the legal arena is innocent until proven guilty.  In the court of public opinion he has already been convicted.  Good thing we have both in this country, because I am sure a lot of us here would have been tar and feathered for some of the stuff we have done in our pasts, and not allowed to even breath if we followed your guidelines of righteousness. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 04:35:18 PM
I just want them to get this right- if there is such a thing.  

If Meyer’s action or inaction led to anyone being harmed in any way- he has to accept a penalty.  

If he couldn’t have been reasonably expected to know or do more- why ruin the career of one of the Icons of the sport?  Does he really deserve it in that case- given that that process already started in the media?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 04:42:53 PM
My GUESS is the Board/President want something like a two game suspension and Meyer is saying no, you showed I did nothing wrong.

They are now stuck.

They cave into Meyer and do nothing with bad optics or they come up with a way to fire him.

The board is concerned with optics.  Meyer may not want to accept a penalty IF the investigation put him in the clear.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 04:46:47 PM
You have mentioned alleged, and even provided a definition of the word, but it seems in your view he is guilty of everything.  I am going guess that Meyer does not share your view point, hence one of the many reasons why he did not get rid of the guy prior.  In my background, I have worked with many people who should not have been where they were position wise, yet remained until something finally happened to remove them-be it retirement, or transfer or termination.  That is what I read into this employment situation, not that Meyer turned a blind eye or built an environment that allowed this to occur.  
The media and people in general are lumping this whole situation into one simple issue and it is not one simple issue.  Smith, like it or not, in the legal arena is innocent until proven guilty.  In the court of public opinion he has already been convicted.  Good thing we have both in this country, because I am sure a lot of us here would have been tar and feathered for some of the stuff we have done in our pasts, and not allowed to even breath if we followed your guidelines of righteousness.  
If I was forced to bet on Zach's guilt, yeah, you've read me enough to know I'd have to decide that gambling against Zach is the best bet. But no one is forcing me to bet, obviously. So I'm sitting back and weighing just like you guys.
I'm also noticing that there's not really anything documented in his favor. The best thing to come out in favor of Zach is a contradicted report (the mom contradicted by herself, with documented texts) by the most partisan journalist involved (Snook). On the other hand, those texts, particularly the one where Zach responds in the affirmative ("I know") to Courtney's declaration of past abuse, is not proof but consistent with the narrative of DV guilt.
Many separate facts are consistent with his deserving to be fired (genitalia selfies, sexual relationship with a subordinate, being bad at football coaching, "Everybody knew" [Ramzy], etc.).
Recap: Is Zach guilty? Did he deserve to be fired long ago? It's not a conclusion. It can't be certain. But if forced to bet, it's the best bet.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 22, 2018, 04:51:40 PM
My GUESS is the Board/President want something like a two game suspension and Meyer is saying no, you showed I did nothing wrong.

They are now stuck.

They cave into Meyer and do nothing with bad optics or they come up with a way to fire him.

The board is concerned with optics.  Meyer may not want to accept a penalty IF the investigation put him in the clear.
why should he? if he followed protocol and is in the clear, there should be no punishment. hell, he's already missed 2+ weeks of coaching his team. that's got to have a detrimental effect on osu this season, at least early on.
if he failed to do something, no issue with some form of punishment equal to the crime, including dismissal. but IF he is cleared, then nothing should be done to him. and if i was meyer, i wouldn't stand for it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 04:54:27 PM
I think OSU is worried about image if they let Meyer off scott free no matter what the facts are, so they wanted a "2 game suspension", and Meyer said No Way, not going to accept that.

Now they are stuck.  If they suspend him, he can come out in public and trash them.  Then what?

Meyer may be talking to his lawyers about his contract options right now.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 04:56:02 PM
My GUESS is the Board/President want something like a two game suspension and Meyer is saying no, you showed I did nothing wrong.

They are now stuck.

They cave into Meyer and do nothing with bad optics or they come up with a way to fire him.

The board is concerned with optics.  Meyer may not want to accept a penalty IF the investigation put him in the clear.
Just saw a Twitter post which says the board wants to completely reinstate him but the president is balking at that because Meyerdoes not want to serve any suspension and feels very strongly that he did nothing wrong
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 04:56:52 PM
My GUESS is the Board/President want something like a two game suspension and Meyer is saying no, you showed I did nothing wrong.

They are now stuck.

They cave into Meyer and do nothing with bad optics or they come up with a way to fire him.

The board is concerned with optics.  Meyer may not want to accept a penalty IF the investigation put him in the clear.
They fire a coach a day before under less than sterling circumstances.And the best UFM comes up with "who makes up a story like that".He neither prepared himself or made himself aware.A major fail for what he makes.I'd call his bluff - time off w/o pay or walk.Hopefully the right decision is made
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 22, 2018, 04:57:24 PM
My GUESS is the Board/President want something like a two game suspension and Meyer is saying no, you showed I did nothing wrong.

They are now stuck.
so, no press conference or word from the meeting at this time?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 22, 2018, 04:58:46 PM
Just saw a Twitter post which says the board wants to completely reinstate him but the president is balking at that because Meyer does not want to serve any suspension and feels very strongly that he did nothing wrong
Urban being Urban
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 05:02:36 PM
We're into optics now, I suspect.  Meyer may be on the phone with his contract lawyers.  The OSU folks may be on the phone with theirs.  The longer this goes the uglier the outcome may be for OSU either way.

If they come out now with an all clear, they will be excoriated also.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 05:03:05 PM
Urban being Urban
Maybe he feels strongly that he did everything right?   Obviously- if the BOT feels that way too, it isn’t just Urban.   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:03:33 PM
Urban being Urban
Careful ;)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 05:05:34 PM
Scenario:

Investigation clears Urban of any contractural issues.
The Board and/or President want a something, 2 game suspension, whatever.
Meyer says NO!

What then?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:05:51 PM
Maybe he feels strongly that he did everything right?   Obviously- if the BOT feels that way too, it isn’t just Urban.  
Maybe. Though from the start, we've consistently expected that the most serious actors involved were Drake and the investigators. So perhaps the most important unknown question is "Who do the investigators most agree with?" Drake or the BoT?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:07:28 PM
Scenario:

Investigation clears Urban of any contractural issues.
The Board and/or President want a something, 2 game suspension, whatever.
Meyer says NO!

What then?
If he's truly cleared (full reporting, even of rumors, and no toxic environment where a serial abuser could hide and remain employed), the reinstate him and apologize.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:10:33 PM
Scenario:

Investigation clears Urban of any contractural issues.
The Board and/or President want a something, 2 game suspension, whatever.
Meyer says NO!

What then?
Scenario:
Investigation does not fully clear Urban, but the results are not such an affront as to terribly jolt the BoT so they pick Urban to stay and feel like a suspension is a nonsensical option (to me, this always seemed bimodal: either he violated his contract or he didn't).
Urban nods.
Drake says NO!
What then?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 05:13:17 PM
I don't see a good out for Ohio State at this point.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 05:15:23 PM
Fire 'em all - I'll take the gig
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 05:17:56 PM
Just saw a Twitter post which says the board wants to completely reinstate him but the president is balking at that because Meyerdoes not want to serve any suspension and feels very strongly that he did nothing wrong
A good friend of mine just sent me this:
My buddy is the VP of sales at 97.1 in Columbus and gave me this update:
Was told that this long deliberation was that the President wants to suspend Urban a few games due to the mess, not that he didn't follow protocol. Urban said no you either 1. Reinstate me 2. fire me and pay me or 3. I walk and you pay me.
Seems like this is the common rumor going around. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 05:19:33 PM
Fire 'em all - I'll take the gig
I volunteer to be on your staff for $250K a year.
I bet we could put together a good group out of here.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:20:51 PM
I am a bit surprised that Urban was invited to stick around for the entirety of the day's deliberations. His interview-style information matters (in case the president or BoT asks for clarification), but it's unusual for his opinion of the committee's conclusion to carry any weight. Although, I guess that is a lot of money...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 05:21:14 PM
OSU and black eye are going to collide I fear.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:22:35 PM
OSU and black eye are going to collide I fear.
That's a pretty dark pun, cincy.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 05:22:45 PM
A good friend of mine just sent me this:
My buddy is the VP of sales at 97.1 in Columbus and gave me this update:
Was told that this long deliberation was that the President wants to suspend Urban a few games due to the mess, not that he didn't follow protocol. Urban said no you either 1. Reinstate me 2. fire me and pay me or 3. I walk and you pay me.
Seems like this is the common rumor going around.
Wow.  I so want to know what the investigation found.   Sounds like nothing. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 05:23:42 PM
I volunteer to be on your staff for $250K a year.
I bet we could put together a good group out of here.
Hey Zach was making over 300k so you'll get at least that......provided you can behave yourself
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:25:41 PM
Will we see the report's full text (with key redactions, of course) or only a set of bullet points/cursory summary?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 22, 2018, 05:26:36 PM
OSU and black eye are going to collide I fear.
if that's their worry, then they need to get over it. they're already bloody and bruised, not much more could come out to make it worse.
just do what is right based on the investigation.
IF meyer is cleared, followed protocol, etc. then reinstate, apologize, institute new procedures, and move on.
IF meyer is guilty of minor protocol mishaps, suspend and/or fine him, and move on.
IF meyer is guilty major protocol breaches, fire him, announce it, work out details later.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 22, 2018, 05:28:39 PM
Will we see the report's full text (with key redactions, of course) or only a set of bullet points/cursory summary?
i think i read that they'll be releasing the full report along with the information gathered to make their judgements. though i could be confusing their statements and the maryland ones.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 05:29:35 PM
1. Reinstate me 2. fire me and pay me or 3. I walk and you pay me.
Seems like this is the common rumor going around.
Show Urbz a picture of Courtney's text to Shelley - see ya in two weeks
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:33:18 PM
i think i read that they'll be releasing the full report along with the information gathered to make their judgements. though i could be confusing their statements and the maryland ones.
I know Maryland is doing that for certain. I'm not sure about it here. Drake did promise transparency, so I'm sure we'll at least get bullet points. The full report would obviously be more transparent but perhaps not what he meant.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:34:54 PM
Fire 'em all - I'll take the gig
Ha, I'm OK with this. I sincerely hope they make you the highest paid coach in the solar system. To prove their long term loyalty. :- )
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:40:05 PM
If the ultimatum is true, I imagine the *actual* worst case scenario for OSU would be for the president to respond to the ultimatum by stepping down, because that's just not the kind of place where he belongs.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 05:45:00 PM
If the ultimatum is true, I imagine the *actual* worst case scenario for OSU would be for the president to respond to the ultimatum by stepping down, because that's just not the kind of place where he belongs.
 You would feel differently if this was Harbaugh.    He would say he standing up on principal knowing that he did everything he could’ve done and did all the proper reporting procedures. I have no doubt in my mind that’s the position you would take    
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 05:45:09 PM
If the ultimatum is true, I imagine the *actual* worst case scenario for OSU would be for the president to respond to the ultimatum by stepping down, because that's just not the kind of place where he belongs.
I don't know anything about Drake if he's decent I'd hope the BoT wouldn't let that happen
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 22, 2018, 05:48:26 PM
But if you believe Saban or Harbaugh know everything about the personal lives of everyone on their staff- I would suggest you are quite naive.
With all the staff "analysts" Saban has, he probably knows everything about MY personal life lol...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 05:49:30 PM
Just keep an eye on the Beer Bwarb
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 05:49:40 PM
You would feel differently if this was Harbaugh.    He would say he standing up on principal knowing that he did everything he could’ve done and did all the proper reporting procedures. I have no doubt in my mind that’s the position you would take    
Ha, I guess I don't need to post anymore. I just need to wait until you telepathically contribute my thoughts.
Anyway, I think I've been pretty consistent that the most important aspect of a university is the academic sector, not the athletic one. I probably lean even moreso on that for Michigan than other schools. And were a President of a university to step down because he feels his authority had been subverted by the power of sports ... 
Well, that'd be such an unprecedented and dark stain that the academic reputation of a university might never recover.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 22, 2018, 05:59:22 PM
Just keep an eye on the Beer Bwarb
Nah, Sark ain't on staff any more...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 05:59:38 PM
Ha, I guess I don't need to post anymore. I just need to wait until you telepathically contribute my thoughts.
Anyway, I think I've been pretty consistent that the most important aspect of a university is the academic sector, not the athletic one. I probably lean even moreso on that for Michigan than other schools. And were a President of a university to step down because he feels his authority had been subverted by the power of sports ...
Well, that'd be such an unprecedented and dark stain that the academic reputation of a university might never recover.
Or- if the evidence Supports the fact that the head football coach did nothing wrong and could not have done more but the president wants to punish him anyway for the sake of optics and the strange environment our country is in right now, then I don’t need to have telepathy to understand your take. You’re taking has been consistent, it’s been anti-urban Meyer from the very beginning and remain so now
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 06:01:54 PM
Nah, Sark ain't on staff any more...
St Nick likes the finer things - just a heads up
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 06:07:48 PM
Or- if the evidence Supports the fact that the head football coach did nothing wrong and could not have done more but the president wants to punish him anyway for the sake of optics and the strange environment our country is in right now, then I don’t need to have telepathy to understand your take. You’re taking has been consistent, it’s been anti-urban Meyer from the very beginning and remain so now
If those were the precise facts (if the president is balking at Meyer without evidence, wishing to punish him for truly zero reason), then yeah, it'd would be "the best possible outcome" for OSU to just let that president step down.
But let's spell out that scenario: That would mean that OSU hired a poor and unreasonable president. And the outside world would either look upon that detail with negativity or miss that nuance and STILL look upon it (as if sports subverted absolute university authority) with disdain. And the university's reputation would suffer, again, perhaps, irrevocably.
P.S. I'm not predicting this will happen. I'm just specifying that if Drake walks away, that is waaaaaay worse than Meyer walking away for Ohio State, the University.
P.P.S. Drake has a really positive reputation. The odds of your "Or if" scenario aren't good -- that he's standing up to Meyer for truly zero reason.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 22, 2018, 06:08:03 PM
Here's my take. I've largely dropped off this thread since Urban's public statement that he reported everything he needed to report.

My guess is that Courtney and Zach had major problems... And that neither of them were exactly clean. And that every time that something happened, the police couldn't basically make heads or tails of it, so Zach was never arrested and when Urban looked at it, he couldn't necessarily say that it was Zach's fault--and I'm sure Zach was telling him all the bad things she did.

This probably came to a head with the incidents in late 2015... Which didn't end up with arrests or charges filed. But it did end up with divorce proceedings.

I still think the way it shook out is that the 2015 allegations probably would have been enough to get rid of him, but the divorce largely "kicked the can" in the sense that if Urban believed Courtney was a big part of the problem, that the divorce would at least put that problem to rest. The risk drops significantly if they're not continuing to be married, right?

But the May 2018 criminal trespass and the protective order forced their hand. Obviously that meant that they couldn't have an amicable divorce, so the problems that should have gone away due to divorce were still raging.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 06:11:40 PM
Here's my take. I've largely dropped off this thread since Urban's public statement that he reported everything he needed to report.

My guess is that Courtney and Zach had major problems... And that neither of them were exactly clean. And that every time that something happened, the police couldn't basically make heads or tails of it, so Zach was never arrested and when Urban looked at it, he couldn't necessarily say that it was Zach's fault--and I'm sure Zach was telling him all the bad things she did.

This probably came to a head with the incidents in late 2015... Which didn't end up with arrests or charges filed. But it did end up with divorce proceedings.

I still think the way it shook out is that the 2015 allegations probably would have been enough to get rid of him, but the divorce largely "kicked the can" in the sense that if Urban believed Courtney was a big part of the problem, that the divorce would at least put that problem to rest. The risk drops significantly if they're not continuing to be married, right?

But the May 2018 criminal trespass and the protective order forced their hand. Obviously that meant that they couldn't have an amicable divorce, so the problems that should have gone away due to divorce were still raging.
That's very similar to my sense, too.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 06:21:57 PM
Good take Bwarb - IMO,the saving grace was that Meyer kept his former friends in money as long as he could.And contractually did the right thing,But I think Meyer never had to report up because Zach had already told Gene Smith.But I agree that the University should not show favor to a coach over it's president.If Meyer can't take a couple games then he doesn't give a shit about the university.Just because he totally faffed the media days presser he should pay them back for that
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 06:27:57 PM
Interesting update:

Apparently some believe that drake is pushing for the suspension because he fears other shoes may drop after the decision. Again, I have nothing factual to back this outside of a friend that has a friend that's a VP at a radio stations with connections. FWIW.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 06:33:55 PM
If those were the precise facts (if the president is balking at Meyer without evidence, wishing to punish him for truly zero reason), then yeah, it'd would be "the best possible outcome" for OSU to just let that president step down.
But let's spell out that scenario: That would mean that OSU hired a poor and unreasonable president. And the outside world would either look upon that detail with negativity or miss that nuance and STILL look upon it (as if sports subverted absolute university authority) with disdain. And the university's reputation would suffer, again, perhaps, irrevocably.
P.S. I'm not predicting this will happen. I'm just specifying that if Drake walks away, that is waaaaaay worse than Meyer walking away for Ohio State, the University.
P.P.S. Drake has a really positive reputation. The odds of your "Or if" scenario aren't good -- that he's standing up to Meyer for truly zero reason.
On this, we can agree.  Drake has a great reputation and I agree, losing him would be worse both optically, and in real terms.
I also tend to sense BWARBs post above as well as Nubbz.
If this is all true, then Meyer should just swallow his pride. He did a horrible job at Big Ten Media days.  My guess is, he feels like he told the truth, but in a deceptive way, which he apologized for.  He was answering that question specifically to address that the incident was not an arrest.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 06:45:40 PM
Where I'm at now:

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 22, 2018, 06:57:18 PM
Good take Bwarb - IMO,the saving grace was that Meyer kept his former friends in money as long as he could.And contractually did the right thing,But I think Meyer never had to report up because Zach had already told Gene Smith.But I agree that the University should not show favor to a coach over it's president.If Meyer can't take a couple games then he doesn't give a shit about the university.Just because he totally faffed the media days presser he should pay them back for that
I should be clear that my assumptions are NOT that Urban made any of these decisions in a vacuum. I'm essentially taking him at his word that he reported up anything he should have.
My guess is that with the HR/Title IX people they kicked the can because of the divorce. But that this wasn't Urban's decision, it was a group decision. Otherwise, if he just made these decisions on his own, that likely violates his reporting requirements.
That said, why should he take a suspension if he hasn't done anything which violates his contract requirements? After all, he's already in some ways "served time" by being barred from doing his job for several weeks of fall practice. Why should he take an additional suspension, tarnishing his own reputation further because accepting the suspension is an implicit assumption of guilt.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on August 22, 2018, 06:58:10 PM
Go back and notice the word "alleged." If you did notice it but didn't care, then ... neat for you.
To be accused of multiple instances (rumors) of domestic violence is to allegedly be a serial abuser. There's plenty in this conversation that is up for debate. But if someone debates this one, that person is disagreeing with dictionaries.
So being an alleged serial abuser is enough to fire him? So if I can get someone to allege something against you and I can present rumors that allege something about you. You should be fired.
Again, one instance in 2009. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 07:41:20 PM
So being an alleged serial abuser is enough to fire him? So if I can get someone to allege something against you and I can present rumors that allege something about you. You should be fired.
Again, one instance in 2009.
Yes, 2009 was an anchor that changed Zach's life forever. In terms of lawful termination, that went a long way to losing him the benefit of the doubt.
From that event/arrest forward, any rumor of domestic violence, even the unsubstantiated, has to be treated maximally seriously, investigated each time. Now let's speculate that all such rumors are always deeply investigated and always remain unsubstantiated. Even then, if recurring rumors are frequent enough that they become a distraction, that could be enough to fire him. If the follow-up rumors are frequent or dark enough to become a PR liability, then again that's enough to fire him.
Places of work aren't courts of law. And administrator inconvenience, colleague discomfort and an institution's risk of lost reputation in the face of "alleged serial abuse" legitimize any termination.
Meanwhile: You know what would also absolve OSU of that risk? The fact that Zach wasn't a good football coach. What else? His DUI. His belligerent twitter persona. That he photographed his genitalia during team activities and had a sexual relationship with an OSU football subordinate.
So yeah, even if the entire nation flips and sides with Meyer's handling (and we all may), there's insufficient reason to conclude Zach Smith got a raw deal. That, looking back, boy did he obviously deserve to keep that job.
Job wise, Zach Smith made approximately one squillion fatal errors.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 08:04:56 PM
The longer this lasts, the worse any outcome will be for OSU.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 08:12:44 PM
The longer this lasts, the worse any outcome will be for OSU.


It seems like there's a really nasty impasse. I'm not sure this is primarily about Meyer anymore. It *feels* (I'm clearly guessing) like it's more about Drake v. BoT, with each side staking out how they do things and obstinately realizing how incompatible their perspectives are. 

Ya know, there was always a possibility that today's meeting would be uncomfortable. But if it were, I think we expected it would be for things revealed by the investigation. But I don't think it ended up that way. Maybe these 10 hours have been more uncomfortable than any of us predicted, but it seems like it's moreso for reasons of alpha leadership jockeying (again, still just guessing). 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 22, 2018, 08:58:50 PM
With all the staff "analysts" Saban has, he probably knows everything about MY personal life lol...
Kinda hoping they fire meyer so we can get him for a year as an analyst. :)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 09:03:17 PM
And there it is. Sounds like Urban and Gene Smith are both suspended for a significant chunk of September (3 games for Urban, including through TCU -- no pay).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 09:08:53 PM
I'm very interested in what the report has to say.  To me, this has always been more of an either/or situation.  Either he shouldn't be the coach or he should be.  A suspension certainly feels like a weird half measure that isn't commensurate with the crime - either he protected someone from consequences of domestic violence and should be fired or he didn't and why are we here.    However, I'm guessing there is a lot of information in the report that may modify that view.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 09:09:26 PM
At the presser, it was mentioned that in the case of the 2015 events, Gene Smith and Urban Meyer consulted together and ultimately chose not to pass it onto Compliance, as (apparently?) would be standard. I guess that's the crux of what's being punished. 
Improper/incomplete reporting.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 09:18:22 PM
At the presser, it was mentioned that in the case of the 2015 events, Gene Smith and Urban Meyer consulted together and ultimately chose not to pass it onto Compliance, as (apparently?) would be standard. I guess that's the crux of what's being punished.
If that’s true, this is a bad look for OSU.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 09:22:41 PM
Maybe I am biased, but did Urban not come off as a 1st grader forced to write something on a chalk board? It was a series of run on sentences with his head down and a gun held up to him. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 09:25:18 PM
I would respect Meyer more if he simply resigned.

This is crap.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 09:26:29 PM
Maybe I am biased, but did Urban not come off as a 1st grader forced to write something on a chalk board? It was a series of run on sentences with his head down and a gun held up to him.

I thought that in this situation he did his best to show grace. As the conference opened, he found it difficult to not shake his head left/right (as if feeling a reflexive "groan" or "no") when Drake was speaking, but when given the chance to speak, whereas it seemed (I'm guessing) he is feeling defiant, he suppressed that and spoke subserviently and with respect for Drake. That choked me up a bit, just normal empathy stuff, because it seemed obvious to me how difficult that moment was for him. And he handled it, probably, the best he possibly could.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 09:27:15 PM
Ohio State mangled this badly in my view.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 22, 2018, 09:28:28 PM
I haven't seen it, but man, this seems really odd.  I guess we'll see how things go down in the long haul (hopefully well!) but in the short view this seems like more of a cowtow to public pressure as opposed to being based in any sound principles or decisions.  

For example, the report indicates both Smith and Meyer thought in good faith they didn't need to report because there was no arrest.  However, Urban did report to his supervisor.  It goes out of its way to say that if Urban thought there was domestic abuse he would have fired Smith.  

I dunno, I'm strongly against weird half measures just to appease the public.  That is definitely a result of working in criminal defense and seeing how people are treated as a result of that attitude.  Right now, this seems like a weird half-measure to appease the public, as opposed to being based in any kind of principle or morality.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on August 22, 2018, 09:29:14 PM
If that’s true, this is a bad look for OSU.
Bye Felicia. 
C U Next Time. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 09:29:32 PM
I would respect Meyer more if he simply resigned.

This is crap.
I am surprised that this began as an investigation into failed reporting, passed through a stage of administrative leave while figuring it out ... and then ended up as a verified story of failed reporting ... and the consequence is a stage of suspension, which is basically just administrative leave. 
That is weird. But I'm not sure how to judge it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 09:33:51 PM
Bye Felicia.
C U Next Time.
Really? First off, that four-letter acronym is maybe not the one you wanted to pick for this particular thread. Second, yes, it doesn't look good. OSU is trying and Drake seems like a damn good steward for you guys, so it'll eventually be fine, but don't blame Super for calling it like it is, especially when he words it so carefully ("if...then that's a bad look").
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 22, 2018, 09:36:54 PM
I haven't seen it, but man, this seems really odd.  I guess we'll see how things go down in the long haul (hopefully well!) but in the short view this seems like more of a cowtow to public pressure as opposed to being based in any sound principles or decisions.  

For example, the report indicates both Smith and Meyer thought in good faith they didn't need to report because there was no arrest.  However, Urban did report to his supervisor.  It goes out of its way to say that if Urban thought there was domestic abuse he would have fired Smith.  

I dunno, I'm strongly against weird half measures just to appease the public.  That is definitely a result of working in criminal defense and seeing how people are treated as a result of that attitude.  Right now, this seems like a weird half-measure to appease the public, as opposed to being based in any kind of principle or morality.
Well said I agree. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 22, 2018, 09:39:16 PM
Maybe I am biased, but did Urban not come off as a 1st grader forced to write something on a chalk board? It was a series of run on sentences with his head down and a gun held up to him.

You’re not the only one. Definitely wanted to get through that as quickly as possible. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 09:42:13 PM
I would have dug in had I been the coach, period.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 09:43:16 PM
Very interesting. Gene Smith stated he brought 2015 to Urban? Not the other way around? Also, Urban did not disclose the 2009 incident to Gene when 2015 came up. 

I guess I’m confused what they were investigating then if this is the outcome.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 09:43:47 PM
Bye Felicia.
C U Next Time.
This is an AWFUL representation!! The CAPS aren’t so subliminal.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 09:47:55 PM
Very interesting. Gene Smith stated he brought 2015 to Urban? Not the other way around? Also, Urban did not disclose the 2009 incident to Gene when 2015 came up.

I guess I’m confused what they were investigating then if this is the outcome.
That is where my head was spinning.
Meyer didn’t bring up 2009 to leaders when he brought Smith in to Ohio State. History then repeated itself. In any other organization they would say “what the hell were you thinking. See ya.”
And Smith didn’t report up in 2015. Once again, anywhere else, “What the hell were you thinking. Pack your bags.”
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 09:49:34 PM
This was very badly handled in my view.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 09:52:56 PM
Not sure how I feel about this.   

No doubt it is a bad look.  I am not to worried about how it looks though.

Am I interpreting this right?  Meyer and Gene Smith knew, and discussed the 2015 incident and decided not to report it to compliance?

The investigative committee did NOT conclude Meyer lied at Big Ten Media days?

So are we to think that the conclusion is both of their responsibilities?

So confused.   If they feel it was his responsibility, why did he not get fired?

Seems like at least one of them, if not both, got off lightly.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 10:04:59 PM
From the presser portion delivered by Mary Jo White (Investigator), these items were emphasized:


Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 10:07:06 PM
So confused.   If they feel it was his responsibility, why did he not get fired?

Seems like at least one of them, if not both, got off lightly.  
A lot of people feel that way. I'm just not sure, but maybe the shared blame got them both off easier than if the blame had been unshared.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 10:09:44 PM
#6 above seems to be about the lewd stuff (White House pics, amazon orders, and sexual relationship with a football subordinate) that McMurphy reported this week. 
It's not clear the extent to which that played into the punishment. But of everything listed (in the bulleted oral report), it seems Urban and Gene are only being punished for items #2 and #6.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 22, 2018, 10:10:17 PM
BS
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 22, 2018, 10:14:20 PM
Very interesting. Gene Smith stated he brought 2015 to Urban? Not the other way around? Also, Urban did not disclose the 2009 incident to Gene when 2015 came up.

I guess I’m confused what they were investigating then if this is the outcome.
Shows me they did a piss poor background investigation, and for that I blame Gene Smith, considering it his job to make sure compliance is followed. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 22, 2018, 10:29:13 PM
always figured it would come out this way or even less of a slap on the wrist

was hoping Urban would be been less guilty of not reporting, but he's not

Urban is Urban

Ohio State is protecting him because he wins games

BS, but we all knew this was coming
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 22, 2018, 10:31:01 PM
equally disgusting is the Big Ten Conference statement supporting this investigation and the punishment
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 10:35:37 PM
Shows me they did a piss poor background investigation, and for that I blame Gene Smith, considering it his job to make sure compliance is followed.
Wouldn’t a very basic background investigation when hiring Smith, start and stop with the guy that is hiring him, that also had him on his staff at Florida, and knew about his 2009 arrest (strangulation of pregnant wife)? Gene Smith said Meyer did not tell him about that. 
At a minimum Gene Smith seemed contrite tonight. He apologized and stated he was responsible for 2015. 
Urban meyer breezed through a speed reading competition during his statement. The press conference abruptly ended with the Courtney Smith question, from which the answer is now the headline every news agency covering it is running with. I don’t understand how the PR team didn’t  prep him for the Courtney question. No matter how he might feel about her, there were 100 ways he could have answered that better. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 10:38:22 PM
Urban Meyer: "Most of what I know about Zach Smith is work-related... my biggest regret is I wish I would have known more. Had I known more, I would have taken action must quicker."

Last week Urban and his wife were talking about how they counseled a young couple. This week, he only knows him from work. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 22, 2018, 10:39:46 PM
My thoughts after watching the presser:

I would like to read the BoT meeting notes more than the report the committee will release.  The leaks that the BoT recommended reinstate, and President Drake was holding on a suspension are telling.  I am guessing he was pushing for more than three games.  If true, and leaks reveal that, will he remain at Ohio State and for how long?  Yes, football pays the bills folks, like it or not, it is the way of the college athletic realm right now,and until sports die, they will still have a huge impact on other aspects of the University.  Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame, Texas, Penn State do not get the millions of dollars they do because of academic side of the program.

After watching Urban during the presser, his body language to me told a whole different story than the words coming out of his mouth.  I have years of trained experience in reading body language, and his non verbal ques said a lot to me as the camera was focused on him, most telling was his head shake while President Drake read his statement.  Urban's scripted response also said a lot to me, not just the wording but the manner in which he delivered the statement.  Gene Smith also showed a lot body language that did not represent what was coming out of his mouth.  He jumped in real quick on the first question to shield Urban, who asked for a third repeat and answered the question anyway, instead of letting it die.

My thoughts after, are that this may well be Urban Meyers last season in Columbus, as the Buckeyes Head Coach.  I could easily see him retire after this season, not because of health issues, but because he needs a break.  He will sit out a year, then finish off his career in South Bend.  He stated he was a life long Buckeye, and that may be true, but will justify his move by saying something to the effect his faith brought to him to South Bend.  He will win a National Championship at Notre Dame, and retire having won two titles at Florida, a title at Ohio State and a title at Notre Dame.  Three very impressive football programs, at different times, which will make him more amazing that Saban just staying at Alabama and collecting titles in one program, something many coaches have done over the ages.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 22, 2018, 10:42:59 PM
Wouldn’t a very basic background investigation when hiring Smith, start and stop with the guy that is hiring him, that also had him on his staff at Florida, and knew about his 2009 arrest (strangulation of pregnant wife)? Gene Smith said Meyer did not tell him about that.
At a minimum Gene Smith seemed contrite tonight. He apologized and stated he was responsible for 2015.
Urban meyer breezed through a speed reading competition during his statement. The press conference abruptly ended with the Courtney Smith question, from which the answer is now the headline every news agency covering it is running with. I don’t understand how the PR team didn’t  prep him for the Courtney question. No matter how he might feel about her, there were 100 ways he could have answered that better.
That is ultimately Gene Smith, he is the AD and responsible for the coaches.  If he allowed a free range hire, without proper vetting, then he is responsible. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 10:44:57 PM
 He stated he was a life long Buckeye, and that may be true, but will justify his move by saying something to the effect his faith brought to him to South Bend.  
Haha. RD, you’re a good dude. I’m not sure if you’re joking or serious, but that’s some funny foresight.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 10:48:33 PM
Ohio State, Michigan, Notre Dame, Texas, Penn State do not get the millions of dollars they do because of academic side of the program.
That's right. They get millions for their revenue sports ... and BILLIONS from the academic side. The modern research complex at Big Ten institutions is at least one order of magnitude larger than the most lucrative athletic department.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 22, 2018, 10:48:57 PM
Urban's statement is true BS.  More or less agrees that he completely screws the pooch and drops the ball, but then says OK I accept my suspension

so he's just saying, I screwed up, sorry. I'll keep coaching young men to victories. Go away.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 10:50:31 PM
his non verbal ques said a lot to me as the camera was focused on him, most telling was his head shake while President Drake read his statement.
Yeah, I made the same observation (about the silent head shake when Drake spoke) as the presser unfolded. He was clearly defiant in spirit. But his words were scripted and he stuck with it. I chose to call that graceful. Politely deferring to an authority on a topic you don't believe in is HAARRRDDDD to pull off.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 10:56:21 PM
McMurphy's one mistake/stain in this process remains that he reported that Zach experienced a felony arrest in 2015, and yet at the end of July 2018, that was not true. He should probably let it go at this point, but I will admit the explanation is fascinating:

"On July 24, the Powell, Ohio, Police Department released a “revised report” about the 2015 incident – nearly three years after the incident – and the Powell Police Department changed its original report and now had the arrest box unchecked in its “revised report.”
I asked Powell Police Chief Gary Vest and director of communications Megan Canavan why Powell Police changed the original report. They said because “the terminology was different.”
That didn’t make sense to me last month and it still doesn’t today: either you are arrested or you’re not. You’re pregnant or you’re not pregnant."
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 22, 2018, 10:56:58 PM
I was hoping for better from Urban and Ohio State and the investigation

failure from Urban and the University protecting him is expected

was the investigation really independent?

Ohio State University admits there was a problem that wasn't handled properly.  And the solution is a 3 game suspension????
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 22, 2018, 10:57:21 PM
After watching Urban during the presser, his body language to me told a whole different story than the words coming out of his mouth.  I have years of trained experience in reading body language, and his non verbal ques said a lot to me as the camera was focused on him, most telling was his head shake while President Drake read his statement.  Urban's scripted response also said a lot to me, not just the wording but the manner in which he delivered the statement. 
That's all good and fine but I called him a bullshitter quite some time ago.Can I moonlight training one of those courses.UFM has an inflated view of himself,hell he was named after a Pope
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 11:02:01 PM
That's right. They get millions for their revenue sports ... and BILLIONS from the academic side. The modern research complex at Big Ten institutions is at least one order of magnitude larger than the most lucrative athletic department.
This much is true. Without looking I would hazard a guess that a handful of med device and pharma spin-offs our of Ohio State dwarf the the total athletic revenue over a 5-10 year period. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 22, 2018, 11:09:57 PM
McMurphy's one mistake/stain in this process remains that he reported that Zach experienced a felony arrest in 2015, and yet at the end of July 2018, that was not true. He should probably let it go at this point, but I will admit the explanation is fascinating:

"On July 24, the Powell, Ohio, Police Department released a “revised report” about the 2015 incident – nearly three years after the incident – and the Powell Police Department changed its original report and now had the arrest box unchecked in its “revised report.”
I asked Powell Police Chief Gary Vest and director of communications Megan Canavan why Powell Police changed the original report. They said because “the terminology was different.”
That didn’t make sense to me last month and it still doesn’t today: either you are arrested or you’re not. You’re pregnant or you’re not pregnant."
And that it took til today to POST THE ARREST REPORT HE HAD!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 22, 2018, 11:11:11 PM
So from twitter at the moment, reporters are reading the report and tweeting out the eye-catching parts.

I was wrong. I thought OSU wouldn't dump a lot of truth. Some of the truth out there is embarrassing to say the least.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hawkinole on August 22, 2018, 11:12:01 PM
Maybe I am biased, but did Urban not come off as a 1st grader forced to write something on a chalk board? It was a series of run on sentences with his head down and a gun held up to him.
It looked like Urban Meyer was the hostage in a hostage video. No matter what he thought of the proceedings, he should have avoided the appearance of playing the part of the hostage forced to read a statement. 

Had they known how bad this press conference would go, I think Ohio State would only have brought out the university president, and left it at that. I thought Gene Smith comported himself as well as he could under the circumstances, but it would have been best to leave both him and Meyer out. The optics were horrible.
Ohio State could win a national championship and all could yet be forgotten, but with the suspension this press conference will stick in the collective memory for the next month of every Ohio State, (and Michigan) fan.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 22, 2018, 11:17:42 PM
may as well have not done an investigation or a press conference

just left it at Urban's comment at the Big Ten Media conference 

Zack Smith is a POS and he's been fired - end of story

tuff titty
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 11:19:39 PM
And that it took til today to POST THE ARREST REPORT HE HAD!
McMurphy is definitely playing his cards when it best suits HIM. I will say it’s interesting he actually had the report. A lot of folks were calling him a liar saying he made it up and no report existed.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 11:24:52 PM
An interesting nuance that came out in the investigation might explain why Urban is in trouble at all. 
Mary Jo White explained that (1) Gene told Urban about 2015 and (2) neither of themtold compliance. Ok, well we could ask, why was that Urban's responsibility at all, given that his superior was the one who told him in the first place. The lynchpin seems to be the wording that bridges (1) and (2): that they monitored the criminal investigation and discussed it for a series of months.
If it hadn't been for that, if instead they had only had one interaction about this with Gene relaying the info and then "get out of here, Urban, I'm taking over," I think Gene would have been fired for cause and Urban reinstated. But instead, the two of them went on to a phase of shared stewardship of the allegations. And both knew (and perhaps waffled over the fact that) Compliance was never called.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 22, 2018, 11:27:45 PM
<br />(https://thumb.ibb.co/kYZa5z/907_F9491_6_AD3_4915_9_D90_53_A87_B9_DD7_A6.jpg) (https://ibb.co/kYZa5z)<br />
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 11:29:40 PM
He’s savvier covering his tracks with his public cell phone than Hugh Freeze, so he has that going for him.

https://twitter.com/danwolken/status/1032463262934282240?s=21 (https://twitter.com/danwolken/status/1032463262934282240?s=21)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 22, 2018, 11:30:03 PM
These revelations are many and seems sorta insane. 

Man Urbs was cool with letting Zach Smith slide. Also if I understand someone else's reading of it, Urbs talked about 2015 in the days leading up to Big Ten media days. Then did what he did. Then managed to flub the "what would you say to Courtney Smith" question someone had to know would come. Lordy. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 11:33:46 PM
Ick. That's an inflammatory thing that was certainly not part of the presser.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 11:35:52 PM
An interesting nuance that came out in the investigation might explain why Urban is in trouble at all.
Mary Jo White explained that (1) Gene told Urban about 2015 and (2) neither of themtold compliance. Ok, well we could ask, why was that Urban's responsibility at all, given that his superior was the one who told him in the first place. The lynchpin seems to be the wording that bridges (1) and (2): that they monitored the criminal investigation and discussed it for a series of months.
If it hadn't been for that, if instead they had only had one interaction about this with Gene relaying the info and then "get out of here, Urban, I'm taking over," I think Gene would have been fired for cause and Urban reinstated. But instead, the two of them went on to a phase of shared stewardship of the allegations. And both knew (and perhaps waffled over the fact that) Compliance was never called.
This.  I know everyone wants Urbans’s blood, but how does an AD at one of the nation’s most prominent sports colleges, not report this to compliance and still have a job?   
What am I missing. How does Drake/BOT not fire him immediately?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 22, 2018, 11:37:26 PM
It seems that the allegations of Zach's inappropriate relationship with a suborrdinate -- who was then transferred to a different department -- hasn't been addressed yet. 
I must admit I'm genuinely surprised (impressed with OSU's transparency!) we have this much inside detail. But now that we do, journalists (for whatever your opinions of them) are likely to find that staffer/subordinate.
And when that interview happens,.. it could be another (perhaps equally) big deal.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 11:41:18 PM
These revelations are many and seems sorta insane.

Man Urbs was cool with letting Zach Smith slide. Also if I understand someone else's reading of it, Urbs talked about 2015 in the days leading up to Big Ten media days. Then did what he did. Then managed to flub the "what would you say to Courtney Smith" question someone had to know would come. Lordy.
Personal guess: he didn’t flub that question. He feels no remorse for her, as he probably feels that she did as much or more physical abuse than Zack did, and she waited until the right time to go after the entire program due to her anger at Zack.  
In other words, he has probably heard and seen more evidence to suggest that she has some serious alcohol and emotional issues.  He is probably thinking, how did these two twisted idiots get me into this.  
Not saying I agree, or that is true, but it wouldn’t surprise me.  Clearly, he didn’t take the charges too seriously in terms of believing them, and that’s based on his conversations with the police, Zack, and others who knew them.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 22, 2018, 11:43:49 PM
The investigative committee’s exact words. How did the B.O.T end up here?

https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/1032469726558072832?s=21 (https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/1032469726558072832?s=21)

I’m trying to decipher if I am reading The Onion?

https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/1032466694265028608?s=21 (https://twitter.com/brett_mcmurphy/status/1032466694265028608?s=21)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 22, 2018, 11:57:40 PM
dude wiped his cell phone. consider me suspicious af.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 22, 2018, 11:59:33 PM
dude wiped his cell phone. consider me suspicious af.
Agreed reminds me of Brady.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 23, 2018, 12:05:09 AM
Agreed reminds me of Brady.  
yeah. slightly deflated footballs and hiring degenerate scumbags and harboring domestic violence are totally =
Lulz.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 23, 2018, 12:10:19 AM
as we all already knew, the investigation was a sham.

Investigation report: It was "concerning (Meyer’s) first reaction to a negative media piece exposing his knowledge of the 2015-2016 law enforcement investigation was to worry about the media getting access to information & discussing how to delete messages older than a year"

On July 26, OSU’s general counsel asked Amy Nicol & Brian Voltolini to check Urban Meyer’s phone for texts & they said they had no documents on their end – but no one actually checked Meyer’s phone or even approached him about it.

OSU findings: Zach Smith "promiscuous & embarrassing sexual behavior, drug abuse, truancy, dishonesty, financial irresponsibility, possible NCAA violation & lengthy police investigation into allegations of criminal domestic violence & cybercrimes" yet Meyer never disciplined him.

Investigation report: "We learned Coach Meyer has sometimes had significant memory issues in other situations where he had prior extensive knowledge of events. He has also periodically taken medicine that can negatively impair his memory, concentration & focus"

In June 2016, based on medical advice & direction from Urban Meyer, Zach Smith was admitted to a drug treatment facility for addiction. Source told me this was Sibcy House in Mason, Ohio, & Zach Smith left after 4-days & didn’t complete his 10-day treatment

Investigative report: In 2016, AD Gene Smith, who was generally aware of Zach Smith’s performance issues during this time period, suggested that Coach Meyer consider replacing him. Meyer decided not to do so

Investigation report reveals in May 2014 on recruiting trip to Florida, Zach Smith ran up $600 bill at a strip club along with another OSU football coach. Urban Meyer warned Smith if it happened again, he would be fired

What kind of moron runs up a $600 strip club bill and uses the company card?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 12:18:55 AM
I don't think it was a sham. They collected far more than I expected; those details about the phone and Voltolini's interest in deleting messages older than a year is NOT something that a sham investigation would uncover.
I just think the investigators couldn't possibly collect all evidence. And whenever the evidence was incomplete, they allowed themselves to make cautious conclusions (no conclusions), which would naturally be generous to Meyer.
That's normal and good practice, I think.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 12:39:26 AM
I learn something about myself when scandals like this make the full transition, and I can watch my written record evolve. The most apparent thing is how I dislike it when too many people go all-in in a specific direction. Of course everyone wants to be correct and consistent. But apparently I also like to go against the grain to try to even out discussions.

Before tonight's presser/revelations, I was (unoriginally) counter-balancing the boilerplate OSU talking points (focused on the tall hurdle it'd take to clear Urban, the futility of defending Zach, standing up for McMurphy). Now, I feel like I'm in full counter-balance mode against people who are piling on OSU. As the day wore on, I became very impressed with the investigation, the good stewardship of the president, and even felt empathy for Urban at the press conference.

In the last few hours, there've already been times when a specific detail of this report was so fascinating to me that I couldn't help but share it. And I guess that's a kind of piling on. But I feel no thirst for this to snowball. Good work was done. The investigation topped my most optimistic expectations (in terms of detail/transparency). And Drake stood his ground. I know Cincy and Fearless and others think the punishment is insufficient. But after ruminating, I don't agree. This makes sense. There's closure. And OSU's response deserves respect.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 01:49:37 AM
yeah. slightly deflated footballs and hiring degenerate scumbags and harboring domestic violence are totally =
Lulz.
I was being serious.  Despite the severity of the alleged infractions, it looks shady to me. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 02:42:11 AM
Yeah those are very different contexts, and I like rooting for Brady and thought deflategate was dumb, but deleting messages ahead of an investigation is always shady. There may be times when it was innocent, but it always looks bad.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Temp430 on August 23, 2018, 06:45:36 AM
Is it over?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 23, 2018, 07:01:05 AM
Is it over?
LOL we shall see.  I was very worried the report would uncover all sorts of things unrelated to the issues at hand.  Doesn't appear to!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: CatsbyAZ on August 23, 2018, 07:08:02 AM
Is it over?
Unless McM has more sordid detail to air out, it’s over. Ohio State blames Meyer’s medication, and if you’re an Ohio State fan you’re OK with this because you’re a tool.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 07:34:01 AM
Meyer was  very tense in that press conference.  I wonder if his wife convinced him to stay when he was on the verge of quitting because he feels unfairly treated here.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 07:41:17 AM
Meyer was  very tense in that press conference.  I wonder if his wife convinced him to stay when he was on the verge of quitting because he feels unfairly treated here.

My gut is, at the crux of this, Meyer does not give CS claims much credibility.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 23, 2018, 08:12:53 AM
Personal guess: he didn’t flub that question. He feels no remorse for her, as he probably feels that she did as much or more physical abuse than Zack did, and she waited until the right time to go after the entire program due to her anger at Zack.  
In other words, he has probably heard and seen more evidence to suggest that she has some serious alcohol and emotional issues.  He is probably thinking, how did these two twisted idiots get me into this.  
Not saying I agree, or that is true, but it wouldn’t surprise me.  Clearly, he didn’t take the charges too seriously in terms of believing them, and that’s based on his conversations with the police, Zack, and others who knew them.
He probably is. And he should know. That report tells us a good bit.
For all the talk of leading men, he's just not willing to take responsibility. It's fine. Most people don't. Perhaps I'm reading your tone wrong, but it sounds like he knows more, and can't help but let that bleed through. He did always have trouble not showing some true ugliness in public, but he's a professional. At his age, after all this, he can fake it for half a second.
Let's put it this way, he's told a third-choice running back who isn't as good as last year's recruit or next years the things he needs to hear. He can do that for that question. Unless we want to know the true Urban, but that Urban probably isn't worth defending. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 08:38:45 AM
He probably is. And he should know. That report tells us a good bit.
For all the talk of leading men, he's just not willing to take responsibility. It's fine. Most people don't. Perhaps I'm reading your tone wrong, but it sounds like he knows more, and can't help but let that bleed through. He did always have trouble not showing some true ugliness in public, but he's a professional. At his age, after all this, he can fake it for half a second.
Let's put it this way, he's told a third-choice running back who isn't as good as last year's recruit or next years the things he needs to hear. He can do that for that question. Unless we want to know the true Urban, but that Urban probably isn't worth defending.
I am not defending him, quite opposite really.
Not unlike many powerful coaches, there is a disconnect between what they think they are doing, which is all positive, and what someone they are responsible for does.
You could  see it in his eyes. He firmly believes in the principles he espouses, he believes he is helping young men be better, he personally tries to live it and breath it, and feels that he has done so much good for so many.
He is not making the connection that these incidents with Smith are polar opposite, and that he needed to take more control.   He separates his loyalty, which in his mind is a good thing, from the reality that it goes against his very own beliefs.
He feels he not only did nothing wrong, but actually went out of his way to do extra by getting them in counseling and getting ZS into a rehab.
Again, in modern college football, at the big schools, the coach needs to own things like a CEO would, and practically none of them truly have or understand that skill set.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Drew4UTk on August 23, 2018, 08:51:09 AM
I wish @CoachQ (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1661) would log in and jump in this conversation... He know's Urban Meyer, personally, and had some interesting insight on the guy.  It would be applicable here.  I don't know if he'd share it publicly, but.... it is certainly applicable in this conversation. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 08:52:01 AM
It is interesting to me that a HC who retains an employee who has "issues" (and is underperforming) gets sanctioned by the university.  The employee did not nearly as I can discern commit a crime of which he was convicted or charged.

I wonder how much residual effect this will have on Coach Meyer going forward.  He seemed VERY tense and unhappy.  I suppose that will wear off, but will anything linger?  I am guessing he was on the verge of quitting and maybe his wife calmed him down?

This whole thing is bizarre to me, especially the long delay in announcing the finding.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 09:06:24 AM
Meyer was  very tense in that press conference.  I wonder if his wife convinced him to stay when he was on the verge of quitting because he feels unfairly treated here.

I didn't see/here any of last nite as I was in that precious part of the nite that unless the house was on fire I was in unwind mode.But if he really felt like quitting I wish he had followed thru.In many aspects he made this bed but the program has to sleep in it.Faffing that press conference alone in so many ways was worth a crippling fine
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 23, 2018, 09:08:31 AM
It is interesting to me that a HC who retains an employee who has "issues" (and is underperforming) gets sanctioned by the university.  The employee did not nearly as I can discern commit a crime of which he was convicted or charged.

I wonder how much residual effect this will have on Coach Meyer going forward.  He seemed VERY tense and unhappy.  I suppose that will wear off, but will anything linger?  I am guessing he was on the verge of quitting and maybe his wife calmed him down?

This whole thing is bizarre to me, especially the long delay in announcing the finding.
It was super bizarre, and I'm not sure how Meyer will be coming out of it.  He's never responded especially well to negativity. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 09:09:22 AM
I wish @CoachQ (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?action=profile;u=1661) would log in and jump in this conversation... He know's Urban Meyer, personally, 
Who in the wide,wide world of sports is that?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 23, 2018, 09:10:27 AM
 if you’re an Ohio State fan you’re OK with this because you’re a tool.
I call dibs on being a Halligan Bar. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 09:14:00 AM
Something was going on in that room between 1 PM when they made the decision and when they came out of the room.

I'm pretty sure that something was convincing Meyer to take the punishment.  Meyer may well have been on the verge of quitting.  Perhaps his wife talked him out of it.

His demeanor at the presser was striking, very very tense.  He kept asking for questions to be repeated almost as if he was running clock wanting it to be over.  He also did not respond directly to the question asked in many cases.

How this may impact his attitude and coaching going forward will be interesting.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 09:19:13 AM
How much does it matter to a team if the HC is not on the field for the game?

My guess is not much in nearly every case.  Perhaps in a very tight game, a Spurrier would be the difference versus a mediocre coach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 09:23:27 AM
Unless McM has more sordid detail to air out, it’s over. Ohio State blames Meyer’s medication, and if you’re an Ohio State fan you’re OK with this because you’re a tool.
Put that thing out you'll burn your fingers.Pretty sure the previous 28 pages indicated that this wasn't the case.So outside of your post being pretty much full of shit - it was a great post
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 09:24:28 AM
I call dibs on being a Halligan Bar.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 23, 2018, 09:33:54 AM
It is interesting to me that a HC who retains an employee who has "issues" (and is underperforming) gets sanctioned by the university.  The employee did not nearly as I can discern commit a crime of which he was convicted or charged.

Can you expand a little on this? I think I have a response, but I might be missing the point. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 09:37:34 AM
I'm trying to think about being fired "for cause" versus being retained while having issues.  I probably draw on my work experience too much as that was a different thing obviously.  We would not be fired for a DUI for example, or even have to report it.  We WOULD get fired if we used the corporate AMEX at a strip club.  

We had no reporting requirements about DV incidents unrelated to work.  I don't even think we had to report arrests for whatever, I don't know that as it never came up that I knew about.

So, working at a public university is quite different.  My personal analogy is likely not relevant.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 23, 2018, 10:13:54 AM
Something was going on in that room between 1 PM when they made the decision and when they came out of the room.

I'm pretty sure that something was convincing Meyer to take the punishment.  Meyer may well have been on the verge of quitting.  Perhaps his wife talked him out of it.

His demeanor at the presser was striking, very very tense.  He kept asking for questions to be repeated almost as if he was running clock wanting it to be over.  He also did not respond directly to the question asked in many cases.

How this may impact his attitude and coaching going forward will be interesting.
The long term dynamics with both Urban Meyer and the President will be interesting to follow. Gene Smith will be the cushion in between. There was a pretty clear blow by from Urban at the end of the press conference with the President. I wouldn’t be surprised to see any of the three hit the road in the next 6 - 12 months.
Looking back on it I don’t think Meyer or Gene Smith needed to be at the conference last night. Have them both release well crafted PR statements and prop the President, a trustee, and the lead investigator up there. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 23, 2018, 10:15:56 AM
for some perspective.... Pryor received 5 games for tattoos.   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 10:28:43 AM
for some perspective.... Pryor received 5 games for tattoos.  
but, that was an NCAA infraction
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 10:29:16 AM
That is like saying Gurley received 4 games for autographs.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 10:31:25 AM
Well, I'm confused anyway.  I doubt this hurts the team's prospects at all, to the extent that is a consideration.

Meyer is going to face more questions and my guess is he says "I'm here to talk about OSU football, not other things."

That long delay indicates to me a lot of underlying issues partially resolved, at least to the point of doing the presser, but latent issues have a way of surfacing later.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 23, 2018, 10:31:33 AM
but, that was an NCAA infraction
lol...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 10:32:56 AM
You could  see it in his eyes. He firmly believes in the principles he espouses, he believes he is helping young men be better, he personally tries to live it and breath it, and feels that he has done so much good for so many.
BS
I could see something in his eyes, but it wasn't principles he espouses
his eyes told me he believes people should leave him alone to run his program and stay out of his way
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 23, 2018, 10:33:21 AM
for some perspective.... Pryor received 5 games for tattoos.  
A discount on tattoos, he was suspended 5 games for receiving a discount on tattoos. Trading a gold trinket for a lower price on a tattoo, was a privilege gained by being a football player that wasn't extended to non-student athletes. 
That's apples to oranges comparison though.
More apt would be comparing this to Tressel getting fired for signing a form stating he was unaware of any infractions being committed by his team. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 10:38:05 AM
BS
I could see something in his eyes, but it wasn't principles he espouses
his eyes told me he believes people should leave him alone to run his program and stay out of his way
So are you saying he thinks he wants to left alone (we agree on this part) because he feels like his ends justify his means and he shouldn’t be bothered —-or are you saying he feels he should be left alone because he did everything he was supposed to do?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 23, 2018, 10:38:55 AM
but, that was an NCAA infraction
and also not self-penalized.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 10:39:06 AM
Urban Meyer: "Most of what I know about Zach Smith is work-related... my biggest regret is I wish I would have known more. Had I known more, I would have taken action must quicker."

Last week Urban and his wife were talking about how they counseled a young couple. This week, he only knows him from work.
This,he should have said they're both poor trampled cabbage leaves and let him go.JMO Meyer probably felt if he made it public why Smith was let go it definitely would have affected their income or quality of life.Because whatever happens to Zach financially happens to his ex.Kind of a no win situation - but Meyer painted himself into that corner
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 23, 2018, 10:41:00 AM
The irony in the decision and punishment, if there is one, is that by trying to take the middle ground with a suspension Ohio State has appeased virtually no one. That is why I thought it was all or nothing from the get go.

On one side you have the die hard scarlet & gray now calling for the President’s job, feeling like Meyer is a scapegoat to align with the SJW crowd. See former player and well regarded alum Matt Finkes for an example.

On the other side you have the national media and everyone outside of Ohio marching with their pitchforks, including some former players for Ohio State.

The problem now is this story will persist. David Pollack noted as much. Media members will poke and prod at every angle. They will revisit Chris Rainey, Percy Harvin, and Aaron Hernandez. They will dig deeper on Carlos Hyde and if Zeke had any history while in Columbus. They will seek the admin assistant or her ex-spouse / spouse for an expose. This isn’t Baylor, but with the decision made, there is significant risk that this hangs like a cloud over the school for some time. Death by a thousand paper cuts.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 10:45:07 AM
Looking back on it I don’t think Meyer or Gene Smith needed to be at the conference last night. Have them both release well crafted PR statements and prop the President, a trustee, and the lead investigator up there.
Spot on!One would think they learned their lessons last month,Why risk adding insult to injury
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 23, 2018, 10:48:37 AM
BS
I could see something in his eyes, but it wasn't principles he espouses
his eyes told me he believes people should leave him alone to run his program and stay out of his way
This.

The s*** you have to deal with being a big time college football coach.  The travel, the limited family time, the win-at-all-costs, how you have to kiss the a** of some 17 year old who never did a damn thing in his life, and turn around and kiss the a** of a 70 year old who never played a down in his life.  I'm sure there's a spectrum, but I'm guessing to be a big time head football coach kind of necessitates being a not great guy because of the nature of the job description.  Probably why a couple of good guys I know within the profession have no desire to be head coaches.

That said, it's his program.  Whatever Zach Smith did or didn't do, he's not in jail.  He's free to be employed.  I don't think employing someone like that is a firable offense.  But it speaks to the type of program you want to run.  If Meyer is ok with that, that's his prerogative.  It's not how I'd run my program, but it's not my program.  I don't think it speaks to OSU fans for continuing to root for their school, nor should they feel obliged to if they don't want to.  I know MSU coaches have often done things that I would not do if it was my program, most recently reinstating Reschke.  But it's not my program, and absent any sort of cover up of a crime, I sort of think these guys can put whoever they want on their staff or their rosters, but then deal with whatever harm comes to their reputation for doing so.  I'm long past thinking these guys are motivating by molding young men or any BS like that.  They want to win football games.  They are all egotistical enough to probably do just enough that it doesn't harm their legacies, but not for any sort altruistic reasons.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 10:55:30 AM
No doubt the media will be all over this looking for more dirt, any dirt, even at times speculative made up dirt.

I don't know if Meyer will survive as HC past this season because of the barrage of questions and revelations that he will face.  I'm sure he will say "I am here to talk about OSU football, nothing else.", but the questions will be hammered at him anyway, even at half time when they usually use coachspeak.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 10:58:01 AM
No doubt the media will be all over this looking for more dirt, any dirt, even at times speculative made up dirt.

I don't know if Meyer will survive as HC past this season because of the barrage of questions and revelations that he will face.  I'm sure he will say "I am here to talk about OSU football, nothing else.", but the questions will be hammered at him anyway, even at half time when they usually use coachspeak.


this type of pressure caused Doctor Tom to retire after the 97 season
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 23, 2018, 10:58:01 AM
The irony in the decision and punishment, if there is one, is that by trying to take the middle ground with a suspension Ohio State has appeased virtually no one. That is why I thought it was all or nothing from the get go.

On one side you have the die hard scarlet & gray now calling for the President’s job, feeling like Meyer is a scapegoat to align with the SJW crowd. See former player and well regarded alum Matt Finkes for an example.

On the other side you have the national media and everyone outside of Ohio marching with their pitchforks, including some former players for Ohio State.

The problem now is this story will persist. David Pollack noted as much. Media members will poke and prod at every angle. They will revisit Chris Rainey, Percy Harvin, and Aaron Hernandez. They will dig deeper on Carlos Hyde and if Zeke had any history while in Columbus. They will seek the admin assistant or her ex-spouse / spouse for an expose. This isn’t Baylor, but with the decision made, there is significant risk that this hangs like a cloud over the school for some time. Death by a thousand paper cuts.
I'm back and forth on that.  The way the news cycle goes now things move pretty fast, and after the national media excretes their boilerplate editorials they will move on.  
I do think there is some precedent now on closely examining people around big time teams.  This kind of national coverage, 500K investigation, and suspension for a bigtime coach for more or less keeping a douchebag on staff is unprecedented.  You can bet your bottom dollar Zach Smith isn't the only douchebag to be employed by a football team.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 10:59:18 AM
  You can bet your bottom dollar Zach Smith isn't the only douchebag to be employed by a football team.
that's for DARNED sure
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 11:07:40 AM
This.

The s*** you have to deal with being a big time college football coach.  The travel, the limited family time, the win-at-all-costs, how you have to kiss the a** of some 17 year old who never did a damn thing in his life, and turn around and kiss the a** of a 70 year old who never played a down in his life.  I'm sure there's a spectrum, but I'm guessing to be a big time head football coach kind of necessitates being a not great guy because of the nature of the job description.  Probably why a couple of good guys I know within the profession have no desire to be head coaches.

That said, it's his program.  Whatever Zach Smith did or didn't do, he's not in jail.  He's free to be employed.  I don't think employing someone like that is a firable offense.  But it speaks to the type of program you want to run.  If Meyer is ok with that, that's his prerogative.  It's not how I'd run my program, but it's not my program.  I don't think it speaks to OSU fans for continuing to root for their school, nor should they feel obliged to if they don't want to.  I know MSU coaches have often done things that I would not do if it was my program, most recently reinstating Reschke.  But it's not my program, and absent any sort of cover up of a crime, I sort of think these guys can put whoever they want on their staff or their rosters, but then deal with whatever harm comes to their reputation for doing so.  I'm long past thinking these guys are motivating by molding young men or any BS like that.  They want to win football games.  They are all egotistical enough to probably do just enough that it doesn't harm their legacies, but not for any sort altruistic reasons.
to a point I agree.

"Because Urban Meyer believed Zach Smith never committed domestic violence against his ex-wife, and because investigators ultimately believed that Meyer was sincere in that belief, he’s still the head football coach at Ohio State. "

I took that quote from an article on Eleven Warriors.

https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95589/ohio-states-investigation-proves-urban-meyer-made-mistakes-in-employing-zach-smith (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95589/ohio-states-investigation-proves-urban-meyer-made-mistakes-in-employing-zach-smith)

I tend to agree with it. And it is ironic- it kind of points out that there was a reasonableness to not firing Zach over the DV accusations, and the evidence supports that. (Which is why the smugness on addressing the CS question).
It was the other stuff, the being late for practice, the running up bills in a strip club,etc- and the pattern it created, that Urban admits to not seeing clearly- and likely our of some dumb loyalty to Earle Bruce.
"
But that is not the narrative now.  I think Meyer will ultimately walk away, and mostly because he will feel he does not need this, does not agree with it and will not want to deal with the constant Media mouthpieces who just need clicks, and even today are quoting misstatements about what actually was uncovered.
I would not be surprised if it happens in the next week or so.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 23, 2018, 11:14:52 AM

That said, it's his program.  Whatever Zach Smith did or didn't do, he's not in jail.  He's free to be employed.  I don't think employing someone like that is a firable offense.  But it speaks to the type of program you want to run.  If Meyer is ok with that, that's his prerogative.  It's not how I'd run my program, but it's not my program.  I don't think it speaks to OSU fans for continuing to root for their school, nor should they feel obliged to if they don't want to.  I know MSU coaches have often done things that I would not do if it was my program, most recently reinstating Reschke.  But it's not my program, and absent any sort of cover up of a crime, I sort of think these guys can put whoever they want on their staff or their rosters, but then deal with whatever harm comes to their reputation for doing so.  I'm long past thinking these guys are motivating by molding young men or any BS like that.  They want to win football games.  They are all egotistical enough to probably do just enough that it doesn't harm their legacies, but not for any sort altruistic reasons.
Good post. I think where it ultimately rubs people the wrong way is when guys like Urban sit on a soap box and talk down to the general public, their players and anyone that will listen about the moral code they should live by, while not adhering to any of it themselves. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 11:16:38 AM
I lean to thinking Meyer was on the verge of telling them to shove it, maybe he did and got talked out of that step.

Someone, his wife?, may have said "Give it time, don't make a rash decision."

He quit at Florida as I recall and then "unquit" before he quit again.  Maybe he recalls that step and didn't want to do it rashly, but perhaps after a week of contemplation, he weighs his duty to his team and his legacy and decides it's not worth it.  I don't know about his physical health.

The story isn't over.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 11:18:21 AM
Question to ELA or Sam - both being attorney's.Would McMurphy be libel if he accepted information if Zach Smiths Amazon account was hacked,those invoice copies? - just curious
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 11:22:24 AM
 I think Meyer will ultimately walk away, and mostly because he will feel he does not need this, does not agree with it and will not want to deal with the constant Media mouthpieces who just need clicks, and even today are quoting misstatements about what actually was uncovered.
I would not be surprised if it happens in the next week or so.
as Cinci said he left FLA that way but I'm sure he might have walked had he not done it before.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 23, 2018, 11:31:35 AM
Question to ELA or Sam - both being attorney's.Would McMurphy be libel if he accepted information if Zach Smiths Amazon account was hacked,those invoice copies? - just curious
I'm surprised I haven't seen the Pentagon Papers thrown out there incorrectly yet.

Most publications have internal ethics rules that use a sliding scale when it comes to that, but it's generally not based on legal obligations.  Here, I would think the initial text messages (which are not at issue, but lets pretend) would be more likely to get through than the subsequent salacious but less relevant stuff.  The issue is McMurphy is self-publishing for lack of a better word, so that's not really an issue.

Legally?  Generally it's a three part test, but courts have gone very narrow and very wide on it.  1. Outlet played no role in the illegal gathering; 2. the means by which they obtained the info was legal; and 3. the level of public concern regarding the information.  I think #3 is the biggest issue to overcome any 1st amendment challenge made by McMurphy.  Again, had it been the initial texts, stronger case.  The case is what Meyer knew, not how much of a jag Smith was.  The other issue, is how much of the public concern are sports period?  As important as the Meyer angle is, in the grand scheme of things we are talking about the eomployment status of someone in the entertainment industry.  I think when that person is (I assume) also the highest paid state employee, that makes it part of the public concern.  I imagine any argument made by McMurphy across any of this is Meyer's status as the highest paid state employee, makes all of this a matter of high public concern.

A guy Ohioans know well, may be the best test case, John Boehner.  There a Democratic rival secretly and unlawfully taped Boehner speaking about ethics violations of Newt Gingrich, then leaked them to the press.  The media had no involvement in creating the tapes, nor was there acquisition of them from McDermott illegal, but they knew from the material presented that it not been obtained lawfully.  The ruling was that it was a crime committed by McDermott in making the tapes, but no liability on the media for releasing them, even though they knew they were unlawfully obtained.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 11:36:03 AM

https://www.cbssports.com/college-footba...ban-meyer/ (https://www.cbssports.com/college-football/news/ohio-state-prioritized-football-over-integrity-in-rendering-its-verdict-on-urban-meyer/)

I only cite that as one of a zillion examples of similar pillorying of Ohio State. If the objective of the BoT and President was to handle this openly and fairly so as to avoid damaging media attention, they failed badly on the last part.

This easily could get worse.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 23, 2018, 11:38:03 AM
Heh, when I saw this thread started I almost merged it with the OSU Offseason thread because I thought it would amount to so much nothing that it didn't even warrant it's own thread.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 23, 2018, 11:43:53 AM
A discount on tattoos, he was suspended 5 games for receiving a discount on tattoos. Trading a gold trinket for a lower price on a tattoo, was a privilege gained by being a football player that wasn't extended to non-student athletes.
That's apples to oranges comparison though.
More apt would be comparing this to Tressel getting fired for signing a form stating he was unaware of any infractions being committed by his team.
perhaps it is just my perspective on the world... but discounted tattoos seems better than ignoring what Smith did.   It was more of a statement of how messed up we are in our priorities.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 11:56:09 AM
It's not a matter of what's better or worse but what is encoded in the "law".

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 23, 2018, 12:06:55 PM
It's not a matter of what's better or worse but what is encoded in the "law".


But it should be..  if the "law" is that broken, perhaps it is time to fix.   Discounts = 5 games.   Hiding an abuser, lying and ignoring you're own philosophy on behaviors towards women = less
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hoss on August 23, 2018, 12:11:31 PM
But it should be..  if the "law" is that broken, perhaps it is time to fix.   Discounts = 5 games.   Hiding an abuser, lying and ignoring you're own philosophy on behaviors towards women = less
The alternative- having the NCAA govern this sort of issue- is far worse than accepting that there is a degree of ludicrousness to comparing it with bylaw infractions. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 23, 2018, 12:13:17 PM
The alternative- having the NCAA govern this sort of issue- is far worse than accepting that there is a degree of ludicrousness to comparing it with bylaw infractions.

I think I fall more on this side.  The NCAA struggles enough to enforce their own bylaws, I'd rather they stay out of this.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 12:21:03 PM
There is some controversy about whether Zach Smith committed domestic violence of late, from what I can discern.

The whole thing is rather confusing to me.  What is the official reason given by OSU for UM's punishment?

Is it about not reporting DV up the line?  Gene Smith knew about it apparently.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 12:22:43 PM
The universities wanted to lay out as much common ground as possible to maintain competitiveness, much as NASCAR did with cars.

The devil is in the details.

And the details get detailed.

What is it most here think Meyer did wrong and got punished for?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 23, 2018, 12:26:13 PM
The alternative- having the NCAA govern this sort of issue- is far worse than accepting that there is a degree of ludicrousness to comparing it with bylaw infractions.

one alternative is to start over....  another is not to have an NCAA and just admit schools really don't care..  there really is more than one. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 12:30:08 PM
The whole thing is rather confusing to me.  What is the official reason given by OSU for UM's punishment?

the press conference gave no answers to anything.  the University, the AD, and the head coach all admitted to making mistakes and not handling things properly.
but, they didn't give any details as to what they did wrong
so, really they admitted nothing.  It was a farce.
They tried to save face and failed miserably.  At least as miserably as they failed to handle employee Zach Smith.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 12:35:38 PM
What is it most here think Meyer did wrong and got punished for?
Urban allowed the program and therefore the university to be cast in a very negative light in the national media.
Urban's actions and inaction regarding assistant coach Smith caused the program an ugly black eye 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 01:00:52 PM
What is the official reason given by OSU for UM's punishment?

Is it about not reporting DV up the line?  Gene Smith knew about it apparently.
Mary Jo White mentioned six-points of findings at the podium. Most of them were generous to Gene/Urban, but the errors were:
Not mentioned on the podium but in the document, there were also these:
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 01:06:33 PM
I lean to thinking Meyer was on the verge of telling them to shove it, maybe he did and got talked out of that step.

Someone, his wife?, may have said "Give it time, don't make a rash decision."

He quit at Florida as I recall and then "unquit" before he quit again.  Maybe he recalls that step and didn't want to do it rashly, but perhaps after a week of contemplation, he weighs his duty to his team and his legacy and decides it's not worth it.  I don't know about his physical health.

The story isn't over.
Agreed. I think Urban probably mulled quitting. Frankly, the president may have as well. I think there's a fair chance that none of the three are there in August 2019. However, I think each of them are at least at 50/50 and that Drake is the most likely to stay.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 01:10:53 PM
I think I fall more on this side.  The NCAA struggles enough to enforce their own bylaws, I'd rather they stay out of this.
Mgoblog wrote something today that I thought was nuanced/smart.
The crux was that out of revenue self-interest the NCAA has pushed the notion of "amateurism" at all costs. And that one of these costs is an environment in which perhaps every good player is getting some impermissible benefits under the table. Furthermore, it's clear that each program, at worst, considers this a joke or, at best, cares but after sending the boilerplate "don't do it" ultimately has to look the other way, or at least not stare too hard.
In other words, the NCAA is the central culprit of a culture of "see no evil, hear no evil" silence. That on its own doesn't really matter right? Because in a capitalistic society players trying to earn closer to their market value is not an illegal act, and (rule-breaking aside) not an ethical issue, either.
But what happens when these little sports enclaves with their cultures of silence brush up against true legal and unethical issues, like sexual abuse or domestic violence? Recent evidence, shows how ugly that mixture can be.
The answer to fixing this is to eliminate our cultures of silence. I'm persuaded that, HIGHLY INDIRECTLY, of course the NCAA is the largest force at fault.
My questions: Now that amateurism has brought us these cultures of silence, are they engrained, or can they go away if amateurism goes away? How long until we start over, without amateurism, perhaps without the NCAA?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 01:29:29 PM
Mgoblog wrote something today that I thought was nuanced/smart.
The crux was that out of revenue self-interest the NCAA has pushed the notion of "amateurism" at all costs. And that one of these costs is an environment in which perhaps every good player is getting some impermissible benefits under the table. Furthermore, it's clear that each program, at worst, considers this a joke or, at best, cares but after sending the boilerplate "don't do it" ultimately has to look the other way, or at least not stare too hard.
In other words, the NCAA is the central culprit of a culture of "see no evil, hear no evil" silence. That on its own doesn't really matter right? Because in a capitalistic society players trying to earn closer to their market value is not an illegal act, and (rule-breaking aside) not an ethical issue, either.
But what happens when these little sports enclaves with their cultures of silence brush up against true legal and unethical issues, like sexual abuse or domestic violence? Recent evidence, shows how ugly that mixture can be.
The answer to fixing this is to eliminate our cultures of silence. I'm persuaded that, HIGHLY INDIRECTLY, of course the NCAA is the largest force at fault.
My questions: Now that amateurism has brought us these cultures of silence, are they engrained, or can they go away if amateurism goes away? How long until we start over, without amateurism, perhaps without the NCAA?
Well thought out.  I agree, especially the paragraph regarding what happens when these enclaves come up against societies bigger issues.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 23, 2018, 01:36:48 PM
I think I fall more on this side.  The NCAA struggles enough to enforce their own bylaws, I'd rather they stay out of this.
This. 
What it seems we’re talking about is three mostly separate worlds that sometimes interact:
-NCAA, which is aimed at enforcing amateurism, players’ rights, other piddling things.
-the legal world. Courts, lawyers, judges, actual laws
-The HR world, which would be an institutions’ own policies.
This whole mess is mostly about the third one, with a hint of the second. Zach Smith did a lot of stuff that would get most people fired, but could be explained away. Urban explaining it away could get someone fired in the right circumstance, but here it did not. A more solid legal footing of Smith's malfeasance or Urban’s inaction would’ve made things more clear, but there’s usually a lot of wiggle room.
(Obviously ELA knows this, but it’s a more general statement. I had a friend who got a drunk and disorderly when a friend was giving him a ride home, a car broke down and the cops were called to help. He kicked the cop as his drunk, wriggling self was being thrown into a squad car. Initial charge was assulting an officer. He could’ve been fired the next day, but was considered a strong employee, and wasn’t. Ended up pleading down, getting it off the record, don’t think it’s been an issue since. Life is weird)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 23, 2018, 01:47:01 PM
Mgoblog wrote something today that I thought was nuanced/smart.
The crux was that out of revenue self-interest the NCAA has pushed the notion of "amateurism" at all costs. And that one of these costs is an environment in which perhaps every good player is getting some impermissible benefits under the table. Furthermore, it's clear that each program, at worst, considers this a joke or, at best, cares but after sending the boilerplate "don't do it" ultimately has to look the other way, or at least not stare too hard.
In other words, the NCAA is the central culprit of a culture of "see no evil, hear no evil" silence. That on its own doesn't really matter right? Because in a capitalistic society players trying to earn closer to their market value is not an illegal act, and (rule-breaking aside) not an ethical issue, either.
But what happens when these little sports enclaves with their cultures of silence brush up against true legal and unethical issues, like sexual abuse or domestic violence? Recent evidence, shows how ugly that mixture can be.
The answer to fixing this is to eliminate our cultures of silence. I'm persuaded that, HIGHLY INDIRECTLY, of course the NCAA is the largest force at fault.
My questions: Now that amateurism has brought us these cultures of silence, are they engrained, or can they go away if amateurism goes away? How long until we start over, without amateurism, perhaps without the NCAA?
not that i disagree with anything said there, but this isn't isolated to cfb, fb, or even sports in general. multiple other sports, both amateur and professional, as well as the entertainment industry (movies, tv, music) have all had scandals of abuse (sexual and dv) pop up in the recent past.
so i'm not so sure it's just the ncaa culture of 'hush hush' paying players under table that's generated the "culture of silence". and i don't really have an answer for what IS generating it, but it's permeated more than just amateur athletics.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 01:55:43 PM
not that i disagree with anything said there, but this isn't isolated to cfb, fb, or even sports in general. multiple other sports, both amateur and professional, as well as the entertainment industry (movies, tv, music) have all had scandals of abuse (sexual and dv) pop up in the recent past.
so i'm not so sure it's just the ncaa culture of 'hush hush' paying players under table that's generated the "culture of silence". and i don't really have an answer for what IS generating it, but it's permeated more than just amateur athletics.
That's fair. I crafted a post that accidentally argued that the NCAA is necessary and sufficient for this kind of culture of silence. You're right. A better argument is that it's not necessary, only sufficient. In other words, the NCAA is a strong exacerbator of something that is otherwise already a societal problem.
Why is it a wide societal problem? Good question. It may have something to do with the serially guilty so vigilantly avoiding a comeuppance ... and the many good people who do seldom crappy things feeling they exclusively deserve to be treated like good people and, therefore, recoiling at the idea of airing dirty laundry.
That probably compounds when people get together in groups and teams. And even moreso when those groups and teams are part of a system (NCAA) that passes down the original sin of hiding things that aren't even unethical or illegal.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 23, 2018, 02:07:38 PM
Mgoblog wrote something today that I thought was nuanced/smart.
The crux was that out of revenue self-interest the NCAA has pushed the notion of "amateurism" at all costs. And that one of these costs is an environment in which perhaps every good player is getting some impermissible benefits under the table. Furthermore, it's clear that each program, at worst, considers this a joke or, at best, cares but after sending the boilerplate "don't do it" ultimately has to look the other way, or at least not stare too hard.
In other words, the NCAA is the central culprit of a culture of "see no evil, hear no evil" silence. That on its own doesn't really matter right? Because in a capitalistic society players trying to earn closer to their market value is not an illegal act, and (rule-breaking aside) not an ethical issue, either.
But what happens when these little sports enclaves with their cultures of silence brush up against true legal and unethical issues, like sexual abuse or domestic violence? Recent evidence, shows how ugly that mixture can be.
The answer to fixing this is to eliminate our cultures of silence. I'm persuaded that, HIGHLY INDIRECTLY, of course the NCAA is the largest force at fault.
My questions: Now that amateurism has brought us these cultures of silence, are they engrained, or can they go away if amateurism goes away? How long until we start over, without amateurism, perhaps without the NCAA?
Thanks for sharing.
The responses I've received to my posts on this are what I expected...  Nobody disagreed with my suggestion that Pryor was punished harsher.  Rather, it was two different orgs or "it is what it is".  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 23, 2018, 02:19:18 PM

What it seems we’re talking about is three mostly separate worlds that sometimes interact:
-NCAA, which is aimed at enforcing amateurism, players’ rights, other piddling things.
-the legal world. Courts, lawyers, judges, actual laws
-The HR world, which would be an institutions’ own policies.
Agree.   Sometimes it is very clear... like a player eating a ham sandwich at an event for free or a coach watching porn on his state issued device.   Other times, these start to bleed between all three.  Though I'd argue the NCAA's main goal image.  
The "systems" seems flawed to me when a kid is punished harsher for something most college kids try to do (get a better deal or save money on something you want) vs an adult who doesn't even abide by his own philosophy written on a wall... and adult who doesn't follow HR guidelines...

Regardless, I didn't expect Urban to be fired, nor do I think he should based upon what we know or think we know.   I just think 3 games is light when compared to what others have lost at OSU
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 02:44:24 PM
Hits just keep on coming.According to 11 Warriors Zack Smith is saying he spent the night at the Strip Club in 2014 with Tom Herman using the Company Card.I just wish Meyer had stepped down his protege Smith is leaving steaming piles everywhere
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 23, 2018, 02:47:57 PM
How much of this do people think was about Meyer feeling loyalty to Smith due to his grandfather?  Do you think he ignored the whispers because of that loyalty? 

I could see that happening.  We've all probably done it to an extent with close friends and/or family.   I mean, I often ignore Hoss' inability not to pee himself, but others might take note of it.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 02:55:03 PM
Hits just keep on coming.According to 11 Warriors Zack Smith is saying he spent the night at the Strip Club in 2014 with Tom Herman using the Company Card.I just wish Meyer had stepped down his protege Smith is leaving steaming piles everywhere
Pretty sure it was at his own expense.   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 03:01:14 PM
Pretty sure it was at his own expense.  
Yeah, the report mentioned him going to a Miami strip club that year and paying on his own. The investigators were, however, worried it might be an NCAA violation, because it looked like this was part of the spiel with the high school coaches he brought. I'm not sure which rule that would violate, though.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 03:38:27 PM
so, if you spend your own money that came from a university issued paycheck it makes everything OK????

heck, you can't even spend money the guy next to you earned from his paycheck if that guy is deemed a "booster"
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 03:42:51 PM
I think the issues with that strip club story are:

(a) Can a CFB coach give a HS coach inducements during recruiting?

if not

(b) does a free meal or strip club experience count as an inducement?

if so

(c) Was the $600 tab just for Zach, or was the full tab for the group?

I really doubt anything ever comes of that, though. It's too hard to see clearly.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 03:43:51 PM
5 games off for tatoos or 4 games for autographs is worse than 3 games for whatever Meyer did, except for the fact Meyer loses a chunk of cash.  

The NCAA looks at "impermissible benefits" rather sternly of course, it seems to be a main part of their enforcement ourside Oxford, MS.

Many here have commented that the game itself has a sickness that may over time alter it to an extent we won't recognize or kill it entirely.

These things don't help obviously.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 03:45:13 PM
I think the only hanging chad is that female subordinate of Zach's who (1) he had a sexual relationship with and who (2) was then switched to another department. Without more info, it doesn't make sense to speculate on specific outcomes, but there are several ways for that to become a bad story.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 23, 2018, 03:51:59 PM
None of this makes any sense to me...

Urban [in contravention to what he said] didn't report the 2015 incident to compliance. But clearly it was MORE than on his radar, as he and Gene monitored it for "a series of months". Did nothing.

Urban was aware of at least some of his lewd behavior and other transgressions outside of that incident. Did nothing.

Urban was aware of truancy, drug abuse [and non-completion of rehab], dishonesty, financial irresponsibility, and possible NCAA infractions. Did nothing.

Gene Smith, Urban's boss, recommended getting rid of him. Did nothing.

This makes no sense.

A 3 week suspension is what you give someone who did the bare minimum in his job but perhaps could have done more. It appears Urban was well aware of many of the transgressions, mostly kept them swept under the rug, was even recommended by his boss to cut the guy loose, and continued to protect him at EVERY turn. 

That shows he lacks the decision-making skills necessary to actually lead a complete college football program. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 23, 2018, 03:54:10 PM
And then he gets a pass because he's on medicine that apparently makes him forgetful of major issues with his subordinate. So he can't be disciplined for being a lenient and bad boss, because he suffers memory loss.

But he is still qualified to be paid millions of dollars to coach one of the premier college football teams in the nation. Not like you need functional memory for that!

I wonder if he'll get off when he funnels $100K from a booster to a recruit. "Sorry, NCAA, I'm on this medicine... Is that an infraction? I must have forgot!"

:smiley_confused1:
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 23, 2018, 03:57:35 PM
I think the only hanging chad is that female subordinate of Zach's who (1) he had a sexual relationship with and who (2) was then switched to another department. Without more info, it doesn't make sense to speculate on specific outcomes, but there are several ways for that to become a bad story.
Many, MANY ways for that to become a bad story.
I don't think there's any issue with the tawdry portion of having his sex toys shipped to his office, as long as he didn't use them in his office. I don't think there's necessarily any issue with going to a strip club, whether it was with Tom Herman or not, as long as it was on his own dime. [There could be NCAA issues if he took an HS coach, but I don't really know on that.]
But if he was screwing a staffer, possibly one with which he enjoyed some sort of power imbalance as a member of the coaching staff, and they transferred her while keeping him on staff? That could get ugly. Especially if they transferred her to protect her from his aggressive, jealous, or potentially violent behavior... But if that were the case, then this could become a nuclear story.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 03:58:55 PM
I think the issues with that strip club story are:

(a) Can a CFB coach give a HS coach inducements during recruiting?

Heck NO

(b) does a free meal or strip club experience count as an inducement?

Heck YES


(c) Was the $600 tab just for Zach, or was the full tab for the group?

Let me Guess
also, I enjoy Tom Herrman's name being brought up occasionally
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 23, 2018, 03:59:18 PM
And I don't get Gene Smith... Do you have control of your athletic department, or not?

After 2015, after truancy, after [failed] rehab, you tell Urban "Fire Zack Smith, or I will do it for you." 

You don't "recommend" he get rid of him, and when Urban continues to protect him, let it slide. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 04:00:03 PM
The investigators were no doubt generous to Urban when it came to those medications. I think they were too generous. However, if you scan the side effects and acknowledge memory effects and your interviewee is using that in his favor, what can you do but say "Yeah...geez...maybe he's right." 
The maybe aspect there is essential. From my reading they didn't go further than "maybe." And logically, it would have been unfair to go less far than that. They were stuck because these things can never bring up enough evidence for perfect conclusions.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 04:01:12 PM
(...)

But if he was screwing a staffer, possibly one with which he enjoyed some sort of power imbalance as a member of the coaching staff, and they transferred her while keeping him on staff? That could get ugly. Especially if they transferred her to protect her from his aggressive, jealous, or potentially violent behavior... But if that were the case, then this could become a nuclear story.
Yes
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 04:03:54 PM
And I don't get Gene Smith... Do you have control of your athletic department, or not?

After 2015, after truancy, after [failed] rehab, you tell Urban "Fire Zack Smith, or I will do it for you."

You don't "recommend" he get rid of him, and when Urban continues to protect him, let it slide.
Urban came close to being fired/retiring/quitting. Gene must have come even closer to a firing than that.
Somewhat related and fascinating: Gene Smith was not allowed in the deliberations. That's ... telling.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 23, 2018, 04:14:48 PM
Gene is still haunted by allowing his football team to play in that Sugar Bowl.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 04:20:20 PM
https://thebiglead.com/2018/08/23/urban-meyer-ohio-state-suspension-report/ (https://thebiglead.com/2018/08/23/urban-meyer-ohio-state-suspension-report/)

The university’s report pulled back the cover on the 54-year-old head coach’s handling of the situation and — along with the subsequent press conference — revealed, with stark clarity, something many have known for years: Meyer is a deceitful coward.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Reyd on August 23, 2018, 04:22:07 PM
Urban did not do what he was suppose to do. He and Gene Smith were supposed to kick the info over to compliance. The BoT found that to be sins of omission, not commission hence the 3 game suspension.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: NorthernOhioBuckeye on August 23, 2018, 04:29:45 PM
I have not had a chance to read through the entire thread and today, have only read the first 2 or 3 posts on this page.

My take on this thing is that tOSU got it about right on this one. Meyer is not being held responsible for the DV allegations against ZS. He is suspended due the entire body of behavior that he let ZS get away with. One or two incidents on their own might have been overlooked, but when you take into account the entirety of the behavior of ZS both in Columbus and at Florida, Urban should have dealt with ZS sooner. 

However, one of the things that gets me is the media piling onto Meyer and OSU for not bringing up Courtney Smith in the press conference, implying that she was slighted in this whole ordeal. I think the media has it wrong when they expect Meyer to apologize to her. She should be thanking him for putting his career and reputation on the line to keep her husband employed hoping that they could work out the marriage, and then after the marriage ended, keeping the checks coming from his job. Had Urban not been loyal to Earle Bruce and then by extension, Zach Smith, he would have cut him loose years ago and Courtney would not have lived with the benefit of Zach's income all these years.

And I don't need to hear that it's someone else's fault that she stayed and was abused. If it was as bad as she made it out to be, she had the power to call the police and file charges. SHE chose not too. People can do what they want to lay the blame at Urban's feet saying that he somehow enabled it by risking HIS lively hood and reputation to keep Zach employed. But ultimately, if (and I mean a big if) she was physically abused, she could have ended it with a simple phone call and the willingness to see it through. But she didn't until the money dried up. Something tells me there is more to this story and we will hear about it soon.


Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 04:52:25 PM
I think that's partly correct NOB but one part is close to fully incorrect. The main finding Meyer is being punished for is failure to report the 2015 DV allegations to compliance. (For discussing them with Gene for months but not moving them up the chain)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 23, 2018, 04:59:42 PM
This is being twisted by some into a story line that Meyer condoned DV.

That is a hot button item obviously.  

Was Meyer supposed to make that report to Compliance in 2015 by contract or policy?  I was not clear on that point.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: NorthernOhioBuckeye on August 23, 2018, 05:03:48 PM
I think that's partly correct NOB but one part is close to fully incorrect. The main finding Meyer is being punished for is failure to report the 2015 DV allegations to compliance. (For discussing them with Gene for months but not moving them up the chain)
I get it. However, while listening to the Q&A at the presser, Tim May (Columbus Dispatch beat reporter) asked Gene Smith and Urban about who was responsible for kicking this to compliance. Before Urban could answer, Smith chimed in and stated that it was his job to go to compliance. Tim May then followed up with something to the effect that if it was the AD's job take the matter to compliance, why is Urban on the hot seat for that.  

That makes me believe that UM is really being punished, not for failure to report the specific 2015 incident to compliance, but more for ignoring the warning signs of ZS's poor judgement since 2009 and allowing him to remain on staff. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 23, 2018, 05:13:50 PM
Was Meyer supposed to make that report to Compliance in 2015 by contract or policy?  I was not clear on that point.
I believe his contract states he has report...
"Under his employment contract with OSU, Urban Meyer had at all relevant times an obligation to “immediately report to the [Athletic] Director and to the Department’s Office of Compliance Services in writing if any person or entity, including without limitation, representatives of Ohio State's athletic interests, has violated or is likely to violate or may potentially have violated any [applicable] laws,” including all federal, state and local laws. (Meyer Employment Contract §4.1.d)"
I get it. However, while listening to the Q&A at the presser, Tim May (Columbus Dispatch beat reporter) asked Gene Smith and Urban about who was responsible for kicking this to compliance. Before Urban could answer, Smith chimed in and stated that it was his job to go to compliance. Tim May then followed up with something to the effect that if it was the AD's job take the matter to compliance, why is Urban on the hot seat for that.  

That makes me believe that UM is really being punished, not for failure to report the specific 2015 incident to compliance, but more for ignoring the warning signs of ZS's poor judgement since 2009 and allowing him to remain on staff.

If you read the investigation report, that's not true either. You're not supposed to rely on your boss reporting it to compliance. 
"Reporting requirements are intended to be both broad and redundant – in the case of Coach Meyer, they require reporting (in writing) to two places (to the AD and to Athletic Compliance) and the obligation to report is placed on each individual, an obligation not relieved by the knowledge or reporting by another individual." 
Now, it appears that both Gene and Urban stated--as did a lot of other folks, apparently--that they believed that they didn't need to report in the absence of formal charges or arrest. From the report, it seems that the lesson learned was that OSU needs to train their people better... Which is a fancy way of avoiding holding Urban and Gene responsible for not knowing policy and continuing to protect a douchebag.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Reyd on August 23, 2018, 05:19:34 PM
By contract.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 05:22:20 PM
 I think the media has it wrong when they expect Meyer to apologize to her. She should be thanking him for putting his career and reputation on the line to keep her husband employed hoping that they could work out the marriage, and then after the marriage ended, keeping the checks coming from his job. .
That I agree with IMO Meyer new if their problems became public firing Zach would have been put them in a bad place.That's on Urbs though - he ended up putting the University there instead
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 23, 2018, 05:25:55 PM
The investigators were no doubt generous to Urban when it came to those medications. 
Medications my ass if he'd stick to the truth that's all he'd have to remember
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Brutus Buckeye on August 23, 2018, 05:41:46 PM
(https://beta-static.photobucket.com/images/b502/AkronBuck/s0/1cb75578-9eb2-4304-8fb0-07f61adb4d5d-original.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 23, 2018, 05:45:39 PM
We are laser focused on 2015.
Gene Smith screwed that one up, and said as much in the press conference. I actually don’t see much blame for UM there.

Urban Meyer didn’t mention the 09 Florida incident with Smith strangling his wife in Florida when he hired him at Ohio State. Nor did he mention it, when the 2015 allegation’s popped up. On that account he failed MISERABLY!

Zach Smith got 50 or so “last warnings.” The leash just kept getting longer with each screw up. That’s usually a novice move by a parent with a toddler, not something you deploy with a grown ass man responsible for 18-19 year olds, making $400k a year.

Urban’s first reaction to all of this, when it hit the fan, was how to wipe text messages off his phone. And it’s clear from the investigative report that his director of football ops disclosed that conversation. That will be one heck of a working relationship going forward. 

If there is another bomb to drop it will be the admin assistant for Zach Smith. The investigative media army will pursue that one fully, now that the door has been opened with yesterday’s decision. Her name is all over social media, and her husband / ex-husband was on a scornful Twitter tirade against Urban, before wiping his account in the last week. 

This could get uglier in two ways. First, the relationships amongst administrators and coaches could be very mistrustful, given the punishments and who said what in the report. And second, by not biting the head off the snake yesterday, media army is going to swarm and dig for more and more. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 05:48:40 PM
What a whirlwind.  I was disappointed by what the investigation found. To me, there was enough there to fire Urban, strictly based on the body of horrible behavior ZS exhibited, and was retained. Combined with Urban not telling Gene Smith about the 2009 incident when he hired him, and Meyer apparently deleting phone texts ( although they did look at something like 10,000 texts.

I will add, if it was just the allegations of DV, I could support a case that Meyer just gave ZS the benefit of the doubt based on the counter evidence and his loyalty to his mentor, Earle Bruce. A sincere apology and admission that he should have reported to compliance and told Gene Smith, and I could support a case for reinstatement. But with what we now know, I feel like he should have been terminated. Just too irresponsible to explain away.

I was expecting horrible backlash, but it is ten times worse than I anticipated. Virtually every tweet, talking head and call in radio voice is treating Meyer like the lowest form of human life.  Honestly, the treatment of Art Briles- who covered up years of substantial sex abuse, was not this bad.  Perhaps is because of OSU stature compared to Baylor??   It just surprises me in relation to whatever you could say Urban did/ or didn’t do wrong.  It just seems out of proportion. Perhaps it is because many have bought the now false narrative that he covered up DV?

One interesting aspect is the cry for such a minimal punishment. People are not understanding how people like Meyer work.  It isn’t about the suspension. It’s about the court of public opinion.  Many here think he is flippant and does not care about that, and in some ways in routine matters that may be true. But in matters dealing with judgement of the man, his legacy, what he thought he stands for...no punishment can be worse. I have heard things said about Meyer that made my jaw drop, by people with a public platform and freedom to say what they want.

He has been destroyed, permanently.  He will never be highly regarded again. That is going to sink in to him over the coming days, and I strongly suspect he will resign.  He has no reason to go on, as more wins and accomplishments on the field will not change the media and public perception of him.  He is viewed lower than Zack Smith, and that was clear throughout last night ant today.  I can’t say that is fair, but I guess that’s the risk of being high profile, acting arrogant, and taking the risk of keeping someone like ZS around, even if it is out of some misplaced sense of loyalty.  

This next statement is really for another thread that has not started yet, but I want to get it now, as it is the same as it was for me BEFORE this scandal.

Wisconsin and Michigan will play twice this year, and the winner of that second game will go to the CFP!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 23, 2018, 05:51:36 PM
Zach Smith got 50 or so “last warnings.” The leash just kept getting longer with each screw up. That’s usually a novice move by a parent with a toddler, not something you deploy with a grown ass man responsible for 18-19 year olds, making $400k a year.
Agreed 100%. As a parent, I know full well that if you never follow up with the punishment that you threaten, the behavior never improves. 
How many times do you have to say "if you do X again, you're fired" and not follow up before Smith learned his lesson: I can screw up ANYTHING BUT X, and I won't be fired. 

Quote
If there is another bomb to drop it will be the admin assistant for Zach Smith. The investigative media army will pursue that one fully, now that the door has been opened with yesterday’s decision. Her name is all over social media, and her husband / ex-husband was on a scornful Twitter tirade against Urban, before wiping his account in the last week.

FWIW, the OSU findings were that this employee did not report to him. So it wasn't his admin assistant, unless somehow they're dissembling and she was the assistant assigned to him but actually reported to someone else... 
But based on what I saw in the summary of findings, it seemed like they were determined to cast Meyer in the best possible light through all of this, so I wouldn't doubt that they'd dissemble on that point. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 23, 2018, 05:56:40 PM
(https://beta-static.photobucket.com/images/b502/AkronBuck/s0/1cb75578-9eb2-4304-8fb0-07f61adb4d5d-original.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds)
Your last two contributions to this topic have been consistent, if nothing else. First, a beyond vulgar acronym. Now, a meme mocking domestic violence. Not a great representation of “The Buckeye Nation” referenced at the press conference last night.

And fwiw, I feel the same way about the dot the eye and the blackeye memes floating around out there from opposing fans as well. I thought this corner of the earth was above that.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 23, 2018, 05:57:48 PM
I was expecting horrible backlash, but it is ten times worse than I anticipated. Virtually every tweet, talking head and call in radio voice is treating Meyer like the lowest form of human life.  Honestly, the treatment of Art Briles- who covered up years of substantial sex abuse, was not this bad.  Perhaps is because of OSU stature compared to Baylor??   It just surprises me in relation to whatever you could say Urban did/ or didn’t do wrong.  It just seems out of proportion. Perhaps it is because many have bought the now false narrative that he covered up DV?
Really? Is it possible that you just didn't see it as this bad because you're an OSU fan, not a Baylor fan? 
I seemed to think that the Baylor stuff was popping up in a lot more media than just college sports media. Not as much as Sandusky or Nassar, but a HECK of a lot more than Urban. 
And in some ways, he did cover up DV. He didn't mention the 2009 stuff to Gene. He [nor Gene] reported the 2015 incident to compliance. They said it was because there were no formal charges. But the other aspect of the report was that he just thought Courtney made it all up. He didn't believe there was DV, or didn't want to believe it, so he kept the 2009 matter out of everyone's knowledge and the 2015 matter out of the university's compliance team. He kept the experts from knowledge that would have allowed them to uncover a truth he didn't want to find.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Reyd on August 23, 2018, 06:19:37 PM
Urban and Gene appointed themselves judge, jury, and executioner.
They judge Zack innocent and held Courtney in contempt. As jury the found leniency for themselves and pass the light sentence base on their instructions to themselves.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 06:36:26 PM
Really? Is it possible that you just didn't see it as this bad because you're an OSU fan, not a Baylor fan?
I seemed to think that the Baylor stuff was popping up in a lot more media than just college sports media. Not as much as Sandusky or Nassar, but a HECK of a lot more than Urban.
And in some ways, he did cover up DV. He didn't mention the 2009 stuff to Gene. He [nor Gene] reported the 2015 incident to compliance. They said it was because there were no formal charges. But the other aspect of the report was that he just thought Courtney made it all up. He didn't believe there was DV, or didn't want to believe it, so he kept the 2009 matter out of everyone's knowledge and the 2015 matter out of the university's compliance team. He kept the experts from knowledge that would have allowed them to uncover a truth he didn't want to find.
No, it was clear today. And no I don’t think the issues at OSU even come close to what happened at Baylor.  Why- do you?
Also, I stated my reasons, as did the committee as to why I don’t think he covered up DV, but also I stated my reasons why I would have fired him. He didn’t. In fact, the DV at this juncture is an allegation. 
All I am saying is that the level of unanimous hatred was a bit of a surprise to me. People are talking like Meyer committed multiple rapes. 
Again, to summarize:
- I am disappointed in Meyer and would fire him
- the broad level, and depth of hatred for him, surprised me.  I get that some of it is just mob mentality/ political correctness, and some of it is the natural process in our society of brininging down high successful people, especially for fans if that person is your enemy.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 06:40:06 PM
Urban and Gene appointed themselves judge, jury, and executioner.
They judge Zack innocent and held Courtney in contempt. As jury the found leniency for themselves and pass the light sentence base on their instructions to themselves.
Even though I wouldn’t have fired him solely for the reason of the DV allegations, I would fire him for the overall trend of not reporting, erasing phone texts, and allowing ZS to do too much bad stuff.
On your post, I could easily defend him if that was the issue. In fact, given what he knew, what other versions of the truth were swirling around him, and what the police were doing or not doing, I can’t even call his actions unreasonable.  If that was lol there was here, I wouldn’t even suspend him.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 06:59:14 PM
(https://beta-static.photobucket.com/images/b502/AkronBuck/s0/1cb75578-9eb2-4304-8fb0-07f61adb4d5d-original.jpg?width=1920&height=1080&fit=bounds)
Hey! You're finally coming out of it. No four letter slurs this time.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 23, 2018, 07:01:08 PM
No, it was clear today. And no I don’t think the issues at OSU even come close to what happened at Baylor.  Why- do you?

All I am saying is that the level of unanimous hatred was a bit of a surprise to me. People are talking like Meyer committed multiple rapes.
No, I don't think the issues at OSU come even close to Baylor. What I'm saying is that my perception [as a Purdue fan, not tied to either school] was that the news coverage and outrage over Baylor was much larger than OSU. I'm saying I'm surprised that you seem to perceive the opposite; that it's worse for OSU.
I suggested that might be because you're closer to OSU and other sources--and I'm not sure where you live, bit if it's Ohio, this is obviously going to be bigger news there than elsewhere too. I was suggesting you MIGHT have a skewed version of how big and vitriolic the news is nationally due to that. 

I could be wrong. I got off most social media a while ago, so maybe this has blown up in a way I just haven't seen.

Quote
Also, I stated my reasons, as did the committee as to why I don’t think he covered up DV, but also I stated my reasons why I would have fired him. He didn’t. In fact, the DV at this juncture is an allegation.
Again, I'm saying he believes he didn't cover up DV because he didn't believe it existed. Apparently neither he nor Shelley found Courtney credible. And because there were no formal charges filed against Zach, he didn't believe he was required to report it. 

But I'm saying that this is exactly why we don't put football coaches in charge of adjudicating whether DV occurred. That's why he's supposed to report to compliance. It's why at my job if I hear of something like this, I'm required to report to HR, even if the person disclosing it begs me not to. Because my job trusts me to be an engineer, not to be an expert on DV.

I'm saying the net effect of Meyer's action is to cover up potential DV, because he kept it out of the eyes of people who know a lot more than him about DV. The Compliance office doesn't try to tell him how to attack a fire zone blitz on 3rd and 9. But the exchange for that is that they don't expect him to determine what things are or are not DV--he's required to report it to them.

He failed to do that, and the net effect was that this entire situation was covered up until this year.


Quote
- the broad level, and depth of hatred for him, surprised me.  I get that some of it is just mob mentality/ political correctness, and some of it is the natural process in our society of brininging down high successful people, especially for fans if that person is your enemy.

I think he screwed up. I feel like the OSU investigation was determined to find in his favor, and excused him from blame on some highly sketchy reasons. 

But again, I'm a Purdue fan. I don't hate him. I was the one who basically stepped out of this whole discussion once he publicly stated that he follows all reporting protocols, which turned out not to be true. I even created a plausible alternate hypothesis for why Smith wasn't fired--because the divorce "fixed" the issue as they were no longer married and thus any future DV risk was lessened.

It turns out, though, that he didn't follow reporting protocols. He didn't report a lot of Zach's bad behavior to anyone. He harbored a creepy douchebag who was violating OSU policies at best--and who was also a domestic abuser at worst--because he felt bad over Earl Bruce. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 07:02:27 PM
I get it. However, while listening to the Q&A at the presser, Tim May (Columbus Dispatch beat reporter) asked Gene Smith and Urban about who was responsible for kicking this to compliance. Before Urban could answer, Smith chimed in and stated that it was his job to go to compliance. Tim May then followed up with something to the effect that if it was the AD's job take the matter to compliance, why is Urban on the hot seat for that.  

That makes me believe that UM is really being punished, not for failure to report the specific 2015 incident to compliance, but more for ignoring the warning signs of ZS's poor judgement since 2009 and allowing him to remain on staff.
That's according to one of the suspects of the investigation and not an investigator. Fortunately, we don't have to guess. We have the document and investigator Mary Jo White also spoke last night...
From the presser portion delivered by Mary Jo White (Investigator), these items were emphasized:


  • Meyer was aware of the allegations from 2015. He was informed of them by Gene Smith.
  • Both Urban and Gene regularly monitored the situation for a series of months and noted that it did not result in a law enforcement charges. However, they never reported this knowledge to Compliance.
  • "In the Domestic Violence context especially, there are many cases in which abuse takes place but there is no arrest or criminal prosecution and so simply relying on law enforcement to take action in the face of such allegations is not an adequate response.”
  • Meyer did not deliberately lie at Media Days. Investigators found that Urban did not fully recall in 2018 what he knew in 2015, and had been focused on overturning an erroneous felony arrest report (unspecified: McMurphy’s mistake) and was otherwise unprepared. 
  • Meyer showed good respect for women and cooperation through the investigation
  • A number of instances of misconduct and other problematic conduct performed by Zach Smith while at OSU, some of which was known by Meyer and Smith and some of which was not.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 07:05:37 PM
This is being twisted by some into a story line that Meyer condoned DV.

That is a hot button item obviously.  

Was Meyer supposed to make that report to Compliance in 2015 by contract or policy?  I was not clear on that point.
This came up even before the investigation, actually:
New paragraph 4.1 (e) of Meyer's extension reads:
Coach shall promptly report to Ohio State's Title IX Athletics any known violations of Ohio State's Sexual Misconduct Policy (including, but not limited to, sexual harassment, sexual assault, sexual exploitation, intimate violence and stalking) that involve any student, faculty or staff or that is in connection with a university sponsored activity or event. ... For purposes of this Section 4.1 (e), a "known violation" shall mean a violation or allegation of a violation of Title IX that Coach is aware of or has reasonable cause is taking place or may have taken place.
Another new paragraph makes clear that failure to follow this rule could cost Meyer his job. 
https://www.cleveland.com/osu/2018/08/the_new_clause_in_urban_meyers.html
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 07:14:17 PM
Urban’s first reaction to all of this, when it hit the fan, was how to wipe text messages off his phone. And it’s clear from the investigative report that his director of football ops disclosed that conversation. That will be one heck of a working relationship going forward.
I think, perhaps worse than deleting those texts, was that the investigators learned that Brian Voltolini (Urban's Director of Football Operations) came up with the idea and told Meyer to do it. I said perhaps, because I don't actually know what's worse or all the missing details. But when crucial documents go missing at just the right time, certain evidence of a two-party conspiracy to destroy those documents is at least as damning as the fact that the documents are missing in the first place.
In other words, when the documents are still around, there's room for benefit of the doubt. When there's a known conspiracy to hurriedly delete them, that benefit has to be gone.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 07:19:05 PM
He has been destroyed, permanently.  He will never be highly regarded again. That is going to sink in to him over the coming days, and I strongly suspect he will resign.  He has no reason to go on, as more wins and accomplishments on the field will not change the media and public perception of him.  
It has become a real possibility. Unthinkable just a month ago.
Wisconsin and Michigan will play twice this year, and the winner of that second game will go to the CFP!
Whoa there buddy. It'll take a lot more than preseason drama for Michigan to get there. This East-sided quad battle (OSU, M, MSU, PSU) should be incredible.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 07:19:48 PM
No, I don't think the issues at OSU come even close to Baylor. What I'm saying is that my perception [as a Purdue fan, not tied to either school] was that the news coverage and outrage over Baylor was much larger than OSU. I'm saying I'm surprised that you seem to perceive the opposite; that it's worse for OSU.
I suggested that might be because you're closer to OSU and other sources--and I'm not sure where you live, bit if it's Ohio, this is obviously going to be bigger news there than elsewhere too. I was suggesting you MIGHT have a skewed version of how big and vitriolic the news is nationally due to that.

I could be wrong. I got off most social media a while ago, so maybe this has blown up in a way I just haven't seen.
Again, I'm saying he believes he didn't cover up DV because he didn't believe it existed. Apparently neither he nor Shelley found Courtney credible. And because there were no formal charges filed against Zach, he didn't believe he was required to report it.

But I'm saying that this is exactly why we don't put football coaches in charge of adjudicating whether DV occurred. That's why he's supposed to report to compliance. It's why at my job if I hear of something like this, I'm required to report to HR, even if the person disclosing it begs me not to. Because my job trusts me to be an engineer, not to be an expert on DV.

I'm saying the net effect of Meyer's action is to cover up potential DV, because he kept it out of the eyes of people who know a lot more than him about DV. The Compliance office doesn't try to tell him how to attack a fire zone blitz on 3rd and 9. But the exchange for that is that they don't expect him to determine what things are or are not DV--he's required to report it to them.

He failed to do that, and the net effect was that this entire situation was covered up until this year.


I think he screwed up. I feel like the OSU investigation was determined to find in his favor, and excused him from blame on some highly sketchy reasons.

But again, I'm a Purdue fan. I don't hate him. I was the one who basically stepped out of this whole discussion once he publicly stated that he follows all reporting protocols, which turned out not to be true. I even created a plausible alternate hypothesis for why Smith wasn't fired--because the divorce "fixed" the issue as they were no longer married and thus any future DV risk was lessened.

It turns out, though, that he didn't follow reporting protocols. He didn't report a lot of Zach's bad behavior to anyone. He harbored a creepy douchebag who was violating OSU policies at best--and who was also a domestic abuser at worst--because he felt bad over Earl Bruce.
Yes- I think we are on the same page. 
I live Florida but mostly read and follow national, more well known media.  
What do you think of my theory that UM resigns soon?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 07:21:48 PM
It has become a real possibility. Unthinkable just a month ago.Whoa there buddy. It'll take a lot more than preseason drama for Michigan to get there. This East-sided quad battle (OSU, M, MSU, PSU) should be incredible.
That’s just my prediction- and was before the OSU fiasco.   I just like those two teams to go the distance this season.  I didn’t say it w be easy.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 23, 2018, 07:23:46 PM
HB - you are right that this isn’t Baylor, not even close by my measure at least. 

What is comparable to Baylor though is that the first press conference and wave of punishment have left the public and media hot tempered. The B.O.T took a relatively light approach to punishment, opening the door to more heat. And, when the onion got peeled back further and the media setup camp in Waco, it went all downhill from there. And if it feels hot now, it can get much worse. Baylor, at its peak, was well beyond what we are seeing now. 

Ohio State needs a few things to happen next. 1. Zach Smith needs to find a cave and stay in there and not say anything. 2. They need a do-over with the press conference, where UM appears apologetic and emotional. It could even be unannounced before or after his first practice back 3. They need to hope and pray there are no other skeletons in the closet with the admin asst or anywhere else. The media will find them!

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 07:24:34 PM
No, it was clear today. And no I don’t think the issues at OSU even come close to what happened at Baylor.  Why- do you?
Also, I stated my reasons, as did the committee as to why I don’t think he covered up DV, but also I stated my reasons why I would have fired him. He didn’t. In fact, the DV at this juncture is an allegation.
All I am saying is that the level of unanimous hatred was a bit of a surprise to me. People are talking like Meyer committed multiple rapes.
Again, to summarize:
- I am disappointed in Meyer and would fire him
- the broad level, and depth of hatred for him, surprised me.  I get that some of it is just mob mentality/ political correctness, and some of it is the natural process in our society of brininging down high successful people, especially for fans if that person is your enemy.
I agree this backlash is really bad. But I think you are forgetting the Baylor backlash. It was worse, IMO. Proportionately so. And bled into many more media markets. Today, for example, this showed up as a news item in several non-sports news markets. But the thing with Briles seemed to receive more news along the way at those sites *and* scathing editorials. Today, Urban is facing scathing editorials, but they aren't coming from Fox/CBS/ABC/CNN as they seemed to for Briles. That happened on an even bigger scale if you can believe it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 23, 2018, 09:20:15 PM
However, one of the things that gets me is the media piling onto Meyer and OSU for not bringing up Courtney Smith in the press conference, implying that she was slighted in this whole ordeal. I think the media has it wrong when they expect Meyer to apologize to her. She should be thanking him for putting his career and reputation on the line to keep her husband employed hoping that they could work out the marriage, and then after the marriage ended, keeping the checks coming from his job. Had Urban not been loyal to Earle Bruce and then by extension, Zach Smith, he would have cut him loose years ago and Courtney would not have lived with the benefit of Zach's income all these years.
This honestly leaves me speechless and I think you should spend time with victims of abuse. You’re basically saying she should just be happy she had a money train and so what about the abuse. That’s a mind blowing position.
People tend to have an incredibly difficult time leaving abusive situations. Even more so when children are involved. Questioning her for not leaving is an oversimplification of how difficult that decision is in reality.
I personally believe that she’s half crazy,  saying she should be thsnking urban Meyer for saving the job of her abusive husband is just nuts. How about this... maybe if urban fires him because he’s a monster and a scumbag, it causes him to actually seek help, get it and turn his life around and save his wife from years of abuse and save their children from witness years of unhealthy marriage.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 23, 2018, 09:29:53 PM
I'm trying to think about being fired "for cause" versus being retained while having issues.  I probably draw on my work experience too much as that was a different thing obviously.  We would not be fired for a DUI for example, or even have to report it.  We WOULD get fired if we used the corporate AMEX at a strip club. 
this is what blows my mind honestly.
dude racked up a $600 bill on the company AMEX at a titty bar. Any other employer would fire his employee in a NY minute.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 23, 2018, 09:38:34 PM



Whoa there buddy. It'll take a lot more than preseason drama for Michigan to get there. This East-sided quad battle (OSU, M, MSU, PSU) should be incredible.
Iowa V OSU is how I see it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 10:33:17 PM
sandbagger
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 10:36:29 PM
so after 32 pages here, the answer to the thread's question is:  Urban is in very big trouble

but, not from the AD or the university, or the investigation.  Urban is in Very Big trouble from the press and the court of public opinion

directly the fault of the AD, the university, the investigation, and mostly Urban himself in the way this train wreck was handled
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 10:41:06 PM
This honestly leaves me speechless and I think you should spend time with victims of abuse. You’re basically saying she should just be happy she had a money train and so what about the abuse. That’s a mind blowing position.
People tend to have an incredibly difficult time leaving abusive situations. Even more so when children are involved. Questioning her for not leaving is an oversimplification of how difficult that decision is in reality.
I personally believe that she’s half crazy,  saying she should be thsnking urban Meyer for saving the job of her abusive husband is just nuts. How about this... maybe if urban fires him because he’s a monster and a scumbag, it causes him to actually seek help, get it and turn his life around and save his wife from years of abuse and save their children from witness years of unhealthy marriage.
That's right. We can all admit, in some stories, she sounds like a complete wreck. And then also admit that it's never OK for a lady to be serially abused ... volatile, fully bonkers, tazmanian devil, totally wrecked lady wrecks included.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 10:42:49 PM
this is what blows my mind honestly.
dude racked up a $600 bill on the company AMEX at a titty bar. Any other employer would fire his employee in a NY minute.
To be fair, my read of the document was that this was on Zach's card. The issue, if there was one, is that high school coaches were invited to show and may have been paid for (however, whose tab the $600 covered was never confirmed).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 10:45:45 PM
and just because it was on Zach's card doesn't mean it wasn't expensed to the athletic department

one way or another
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 23, 2018, 11:23:21 PM
and just because it was on Zach's card doesn't mean it wasn't expensed to the athletic department

one way or another
True. And you could be right. But for whatever reason I trust the investigation here. They found things that required a lot harder (and less likely to bear fruit) digging than this (that Voltolini nugget is c-r-a-z-y ... nobody expected that depth). My guess is the story just isn't there for him having charged it to OSU. If there's a story it's about inducing the HS coaches while recruiting. But we'll never know unless he or Herman admits it. So we'll never know.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 23, 2018, 11:32:24 PM
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/the-zach-smith-investigation/2018/08/95616/gene-smiths-attorney-two-great-men-fell-on-the-sword-for-a-university-they-dearly-loved (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/the-zach-smith-investigation/2018/08/95616/gene-smiths-attorney-two-great-men-fell-on-the-sword-for-a-university-they-dearly-loved)


Correct for those who said- this thing isn’t going away.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 23, 2018, 11:35:38 PM
always many things that cannot be proven

It can't be proven that the investigation was a sham, but then the folks responsible for the investigation can't prove it wasn't a sham

I'd guess the investigators didn't have sufficient time to dig deeply down every rat hole

but, that's OK, because the press has nothing but time

I'd be curious as to how many man/hours were actually spent on investigating.  Was it a 5 person team?  Did they work 8 hours a day for 14 days?

How much hard digging was actually done?

I'm guessing they found plenty to warrant a 3-game suspension in the time they spent and someone deemed that sufficient.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 24, 2018, 05:39:08 AM
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/the-zach-smith-investigation/2018/08/95616/gene-smiths-attorney-two-great-men-fell-on-the-sword-for-a-university-they-dearly-loved (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/the-zach-smith-investigation/2018/08/95616/gene-smiths-attorney-two-great-men-fell-on-the-sword-for-a-university-they-dearly-loved)


Correct for those who said- this thing isn’t going away.  
Maybe...give it a few days
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 05:41:31 AM
I think most of the effort expended by the BoT and President were in discussing media relations and damage control.

I also think  they botched that badly and did probably the worst thing possible, a kind of symbolic suspension to make it seem they did something, and that has not been accepted as sufficient.  They may have been better off saying Meyer is in the clear, he made some misjudgments, but nothing warranting further penalties.

Everyone makes misjudgments, every coach, every one of us at times.  But if they get public scrutiny, our "superiors" may need to make an example of us, whereas had it been a private thing they would have said "OK, do better next time.".

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 05:43:34 AM
and just because it was on Zach's card doesn't mean it wasn't expensed to the athletic department

one way or another


We had corporate AMEX cards for travel.  We were responsible for the bill.  We weren't supposed to use it for private tabs but could in a situation, we just couldn't expense it and paid it ourselves.

I got in a bind once because the rental car agency wouldn't take my personal card and I used the company AMEX, and I was on a job interview, which was a bit of a pickle, but nobody noticed.  I just paid the bill myself rather quickly.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 05:46:39 AM
And the reason this won't go away soon is the media types see blood in the water here.  If any of them can find (or fabricate) ANYTHING they get their 15 minutes.  It's huge for their careers.

They can interview folks out there in the athletic department for more dirt, more gossip, more whatever, and they will.  I bet there are at least 20 "reporters" in Columbus who would be elsewhere in normal times.  Urban won't be able to leave his house, nor will his wife.  Every secretary in the department will be facing questions from the media.

That press conference was brief, too brief, and too long at the same time, and raised a lot of questions.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 24, 2018, 06:04:23 AM
I'm not sure they botched it.  Again, give it a few days and see what comes.  Obviously, there will be more questions, but ripping off the band aid was going to hurt and there were no good ways to make it happen.  It's out, it's done.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 06:34:40 AM
Yes, we will wait and see, and I could well be wrong here and we'll see this doesn't have legs and basically goes away amidst the real news of the season starting.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 24, 2018, 08:41:53 AM
 They may have been better off saying Meyer is in the clear, he made some misjudgments, but nothing warranting further penalties.

Everyone makes misjudgments, every coach, every one of us at times.  But if they get public scrutiny, our "superiors" may need to make an example of us, whereas had it been a private thing they would have said "OK, do better next time.".
I dunno Gainesville.........C-Bus.Urban's own arrogance painted himself in the corner.Seriously IMO the guy is either a narcissist or has no common sense or both.Like Mario said - last week they(the Meyers) counseled the Smiths.This week he says he didn't know Zach outside of work - really the guy on your Fla staff.It's this smug condescending BS that makes people just want to shred him.But he sits at the podium like Christ come to clean the Temple.Again the coup de gras here was the assholes blatant disregard for taking a whole 2 minutes to prepare a statement for the Conference Media Days event.Then the University could have prepped a statement and much of this could have been avoided.Now in the eyes of the Public he is a Liar - and unfortunately the face of Ohio State Football.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 24, 2018, 08:48:29 AM
So now he’s REALLY DQed for BTCOY, right?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 24, 2018, 09:16:55 AM
So now he’s REALLY DQed for BTCOY, right?
What are the criteria for the award?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: NorthernOhioBuckeye on August 24, 2018, 09:22:37 AM
This honestly leaves me speechless and I think you should spend time with victims of abuse. You’re basically saying she should just be happy she had a money train and so what about the abuse. That’s a mind blowing position.
People tend to have an incredibly difficult time leaving abusive situations. Even more so when children are involved. Questioning her for not leaving is an oversimplification of how difficult that decision is in reality.
I personally believe that she’s half crazy,  saying she should be thsnking urban Meyer for saving the job of her abusive husband is just nuts. How about this... maybe if urban fires him because he’s a monster and a scumbag, it causes him to actually seek help, get it and turn his life around and save his wife from years of abuse and save their children from witness years of unhealthy marriage.
If Courtney was being physically abused by Zach, she had the means to end it with one phone call. To try to hang that on Meyer is a stretch. To want Urban to apologize for this abuse is laughable. Urban didn't touch her nor did he condone it. 

I find it telling that she didn't go to the media until Zach was fired. One could postulate that it was due to the money flow being shut off that caused her to break her silence. I also find it telling that she essentially set Zach up to get him on the trespassing charge by intentionally failing to meet at a predetermined drop off point to allow him to drop off her son, and then sitting on the porch with a camera to catch him in her driveway. 

I don't believe that Zach is innocent in this and is most likely a complete scum bag. But I also don't believe that Courtney has a halo over her head either. Based on the numerous reports on the matter, I think they are both bat crap crazy. I also believe that Meyer saw their marriage as the train wreck that is was and was doing what he could be ensure that money would not be an issue in their failed marriage. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 24, 2018, 09:36:13 AM

Everyone makes misjudgments, every coach, every one of us at times.  But if they get public scrutiny, our "superiors" may need to make an example of us, whereas had it been a private thing they would have said "OK, do better next time.".


I think privately telling Zach, over and over and over, to "do better next time", is what got Urban in this mess. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 24, 2018, 09:47:00 AM
What are the criteria for the award?
1. Not be the Head Coach of Ohio State Football.
2. Does not matter after #1. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 24, 2018, 09:54:42 AM
What are the criteria for the award?
Overachieve most in relation to preseason projections.  That does make it nearly impossible for the OSU coach to win it, although I think he should have in 2012 of BOB.  Probably would have in 2014 if the vote was after the CFP, not just after the regular season.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 24, 2018, 10:01:38 AM
I find it telling that she didn't go to the media until Zach was fired. One could postulate that it was due to the money flow being shut off that caused her to break her silence. 
I have tarred and feathered Urban over on 11 Warriors.This is one thing he didn't do wrong.Courtney is hardly a wallflower or a victim and has been caught embellishing.The kids on the other hand have my compassion.Again IMO I think Urban knew if he fired Zach he wouldn't be able to support his ex and kids in a reasonably comfortable fashion.But the two of them had 6 years to sort it out and should have nipped it in the bud then.
 Jim Tressell fell on his sword and the University looked better for it.Urban should have done the same because this debacle has his finger prints all over it
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 24, 2018, 10:17:03 AM
If Courtney was being physically abused by Zach, she had the means to end it with one phone call. To try to hang that on Meyer is a stretch. To want Urban to apologize for this abuse is laughable. Urban didn't touch her nor did he condone it.

I find it telling that she didn't go to the media until Zach was fired. One could postulate that it was due to the money flow being shut off that caused her to break her silence. I also find it telling that she essentially set Zach up to get him on the trespassing charge by intentionally failing to meet at a predetermined drop off point to allow him to drop off her son, and then sitting on the porch with a camera to catch him in her driveway.

I don't believe that Zach is innocent in this and is most likely a complete scum bag. But I also don't believe that Courtney has a halo over her head either. Based on the numerous reports on the matter, I think they are both bat crap crazy. I also believe that Meyer saw their marriage as the train wreck that is was and was doing what he could be ensure that money would not be an issue in their failed marriage.

The knots a man can twist himself into.
It's interesting, he at least theoretically would've given a woman the benefit of the doubt, given his "principles." (The ones up on a wall anyway) But in reality, we see he did not give such benefit. We can argue if he gave that benefit to the man in this case. He certainly gave it in every way beyond the DV stuff. 
I liked Spencer Hall's article on this, though it was both raw and savage and perhaps too spicy considering the present conditions. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Roaddawg on August 24, 2018, 10:20:35 AM
There are so many different angles and such to this mess, which is why I turned off all sports coverage during the day yesterday.  A lot different views, thoughts and woulda, shoulda, coulda's.  To me, the story is so twisted and out of scope that even sports media is not sure on how to cover this, so they just throw buckets of crap, from all angles, just to keep the story going and fill air time.  For example, every single talking head at ESPN has provided us with the opinion and holy way of how they would have handled this situation.  For the most part, they are all nailing Urban Meyer to the cross and walking away saying how dishonorable a coach, mentor, and person he is, yet, under the scathing headlines of blasting him for his lack of response to domestic violence issues, they run an updated ticker of Tiger Woods golf scores and have a nice happy birthday wish for the "mamba" Kobe Bryant.  Talk about two faced and several other words I could use!

Regarding Urban's cell phone, it is striking to me how dumb people really are in this age of tech gadgets.  We are all so attached that phone, and many of us use it for just about everything in our lives, which leaves a foot print well after the delete button is used. If they wanted to really know what he had on his phone, they would have been more than able to find out, maybe not in the two week time frame, but they could have found whatever they were looking for on his phone.

As I said before, I will be very surprised if Urban Meyer is on the sidelines in Columbus next season.  He is in control of how this situation finishes up, not the media.  Anything he says in public forum will be coach speak, or the PC way in which we expect his answer to be, not the way we would really like to hear the answer.  Just once, I would love to hear a coach say it like it really should be said.  In this case, Urban Meyer looks at the reporters sitting there and says:  Yes, I f$#ked up hiring Zach Smith again, and by not firing his ass sooner than I did.  No excuses as to why, or if I could have canned him earlier, I just did not do that.  In hind sight, I should have, moving forward, I will not make that same mistake again.  IF he were to say that (legal whatever aside), I think a lot more folks would have a lot less to say! 

So much more to say, rant, babble, etc, about this, but..........my tee time awaits, and thus the start of the weekend!  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 24, 2018, 10:21:26 AM
Overachieve most in relation to preseason projections.  That does make it nearly impossible for the OSU coach to win it, although I think he should have in 2012 of BOB.  Probably would have in 2014 if the vote was after the CFP, not just after the regular season.  
Yep. I think there's like 3-4 years an OSU coach has had a case. The question after that is it almost a given SOMEONE else will overachieve to a degree. The 2014 one was weird. It was a year without a great candidate. But OSU had also lost to Va. Tech and had a second-best win of either Cincinnati or Minnesota. 
Such is life when you have the best team most years. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on August 24, 2018, 10:36:27 AM


I'm saying the net effect of Meyer's action is to cover up potential DV, because he kept it out of the eyes of people who know a lot more than him about DV. The Compliance office doesn't try to tell him how to attack a fire zone blitz on 3rd and 9. But the exchange for that is that they don't expect him to determine what things are or are not DV--he's required to report it to them.

He failed to do that, and the net effect was that this entire situation was covered up until this year.



Actually it was in the hands of people who know more about DV than Meyer. It was in the hands of the police (and I could assume but not sure the hands of the DA) whose job it is to determine if DV has occur and should be charged. And DV was not charged. All compliance is going to to do is determined if University and NCAA rules have been violated and something needs to be done. And from the reading of the parts of the contract that someone above posted, I would question whether I would need to report if an arrest wasn't made. Which is what the board said, we made it clear to both Smith and Meyer that the need to report even if there is no arrest.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 10:38:38 AM
If the HC and AD discuss the issue and decide not to report to Compliance in good faith, I don't see that as much of a deal even if they are supposed to report it technically.  As noted, Compliance is not there to hire and hire or discipline, only to determine of NCAA rules were infracted, which could not be the case here.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 24, 2018, 10:44:20 AM
There continues to be a lack of understanding on the psyche of a DV victim.

Nicole Brown Simpson called 911 more frequently than Courtney, and without pushing or getting charges each time.

When the only compensation your family has is it at stake, as well as the connectivity of the family unit itself, you don’t think clearly. Courtney may have had her issues, at least through rumors we have heard that. BUT, for some on here to say the ball was in her court and she didn’t do anything about is callous. The ball was just as much in Nicole Simpson’s court too.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 24, 2018, 10:47:36 AM
Actually it was in the hands of people who know more about DV than Meyer. It was in the hands of the police (and I could assume but not sure the hands of the DA) whose job it is to determine if DV has occur and should be charged. And DV was not charged. Are compliance is going to to do is determined if University and NCAA rules have been violated and something needs to be done. And from the reading of the parts of the contract that someone above posted, I would question whether I would need to report if an arrest wasn't made. Which is what the board said, we made it clear to both Smith and Meyer that the need to report even if there is no arrest.
Riffraft:
(1) Urban and Gene were each and separately obligated by contract to go to compliance.
(2) the idea that the police investigating is enough to peace out and do no more is outdated and incorrect. And Mary Jo White emphasized that. That too often women are abused but charges can't come because jail time is such a tough punishment, the justice system must use the strictest standards for guilt. It would be inappropriate for employers to settle for that. Which is why the contracts are written as they are
Not being found guilty criminally is not the same as being innocent. So places like OSU are designed to try better
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 10:49:42 AM
That is a good point, but not really relevant to the Meyer situation, I think.

Comment directed a how abused spouses may not press charges, not the later post.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 24, 2018, 10:53:42 AM
I have no judgments on Courtney Smith.  However, I believe all of the 2015 911 calls were after they were split up and were getting a divorce (I know at least one was before the divorce was filed but it is not contested that they were split up).  Evaluating a history of abuse is inherently problematic during such a time, so I don't really fault Gene Smith and Urban for their tack of waiting for the police, who obviously were aware of the situation because they informed OSU.  It seems reasonable to me under the circumstances, if perhaps not what they were contractually obligated to do.

The less reasonable thing was Urban failing to disclose the 09 arrest to Gene Smith.

Also, Rmazy tweeted about Urban's brain surgery in 2014.  I had completely forgotten about that, but the memory meds may make more sense in that context.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on August 24, 2018, 10:59:37 AM
Riffraft:
(1) Urban and Gene were each and separately obligated by contract to go to compliance.
(2) the idea that the police investigating is enough to peace out and do no more is outdated and incorrect. And Mary Jo White emphasized that. That too often women are abused but charges can't come because jail time is such a tough punishment, the justice system must use the strictest standards for guilt. It would be inappropriate for employers to settle for that. Which is why the contracts are written as they are
Not being found guilty criminally is not the same as being innocent. So places like OSU are designed to try better
(1) Did you not read my post? I said by my reading of the contract, I am not sure I would have reported it to compliance, Which is what the report said about Smith and Meyer. They believed that the didn't have to report it because there was no arrest, but they monitored it to see where it went. The board made it clear that even if no arrest it has to be reported.
(2) So you, like bwarbiary, whose comment I was responding to, believe that the compliance department that is designed to determine if University and NCAA policy, is better able to determine whether DV happened than the police and/or the DA. The police and the DA do not use the strictest standard of guilt to bring charges, that is for the final arbiter, the courts. The police and the DA only determine if there is enough evidence to bring charges.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 24, 2018, 11:45:09 AM
Also, Rmazy tweeted about Urban's brain surgery in 2014.  I had completely forgotten about that, but the memory meds may make more sense in that context.
Brain Surgery?i don't recall hearing about that
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on August 24, 2018, 11:45:30 AM
Yes, we will wait and see, and I could well be wrong here and we'll see this doesn't have legs and basically goes away amidst the real news of the season starting.


I agree.  If this was two weeks from now, it is discussed less than today.   Once the season starts, there will be comments or remarks, but not the constant coverage.
btw.. as a husker fan, I felt the Baylor coverage > OSU coverage.   It probably feels, as a fan of OSU, like a constant bombardment (and we know how that feels), but Baylor was covered outside of sports and for a lot longer.   3 months from now, perhaps I'll be incorrect, but up to this point, I think the story has mostly run it's course. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 24, 2018, 11:55:22 AM
I agree.  If this was two weeks from now, it is discussed less than today.   Once the season starts, there will be comments or remarks, but not the constant coverage.
btw.. as a husker fan, I felt the Baylor coverage > OSU coverage.   It probably feels, as a fan of OSU, like a constant bombardment (and we know how that feels), but Baylor was covered outside of sports and for a lot longer.   3 months from now, perhaps I'll be incorrect, but up to this point, I think the story has mostly run it's course.  
I'd like to think that, but I doubt it.  ESPN has fired most of their talent that knows anything about the game, and they put very little effort and resources into doing so outside of actual game presentation.
All sports, not just college football, ahs turned into off the field/court hot take central over there.  Again, I'd say that must get better ratings than Xs and Os stuff, otherwise they wouldn't do it, but they way they handle their studio stuff over there now, like continuing to shove that Greenburg-Beedle-Rose train wreck down our throats makes me realize that I don't think they do.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 24, 2018, 12:05:06 PM
Ohio St needs to circle the wagons and keep things VERY quiet

if the hacks in the media don't find anything noteworthy for a couple weeks things will subside

if something juicy pops up - it's off to the races again
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 24, 2018, 12:11:01 PM
Brain Surgery?i don't recall hearing about that
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2014/03/34023/meyer-health-fine-buckeyes-adequate-day-1
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 12:40:20 PM
I think the media types will be around Ohio State for months, not weeks, even if they find little.  We could see episodic stories about stuff, and find the stuff seems very trivial or due to unnamed sources etc.

Starting the season will help of course.  If somehow TCU upsets the Bucks, holy cow.

I bet every secretary in the department is fending off requests for comment.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 24, 2018, 12:53:21 PM
I bet Urban isn't taking the wife out in public for dinner.

Might get a glass of water tossed at his table from a woman that does not approve of his handling of the situation.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 12:59:13 PM
Had he fired ZS in 2015, or never hired him, or reported him to compliance, it would not have helped the wife's situation at all.

Meyer's actions helped her in effect.  Perhaps someone can explain why Meyer's actions harmed her.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 24, 2018, 01:10:42 PM
he'll serve his suspension and eventually it will all just blow over in the news cycle and the sports media will move onto the next scandal.

Meyer will go on winning games but his reputation is shot to hell and this will follow him around forever and put a stain on his legacy imo.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 24, 2018, 01:12:02 PM
https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football/2014/03/34023/meyer-health-fine-buckeyes-adequate-day-1
I had one of those. Took about a half hour and I was home in about 2 hours.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 24, 2018, 01:16:51 PM
If Courtney was being physically abused by Zach, she had the means to end it with one phone call. To try to hang that on Meyer is a stretch. To want Urban to apologize for this abuse is laughable. Urban didn't touch her nor did he condone it.

I find it telling that she didn't go to the media until Zach was fired. One could postulate that it was due to the money flow being shut off that caused her to break her silence. I also find it telling that she essentially set Zach up to get him on the trespassing charge by intentionally failing to meet at a predetermined drop off point to allow him to drop off her son, and then sitting on the porch with a camera to catch him in her driveway.

I don't believe that Zach is innocent in this and is most likely a complete scum bag. But I also don't believe that Courtney has a halo over her head either. Based on the numerous reports on the matter, I think they are both bat crap crazy. I also believe that Meyer saw their marriage as the train wreck that is was and was doing what he could be ensure that money would not be an issue in their failed marriage.
I think our views are similar for the most part, except for a few small nuances. I don't think most reasonable people are blaming Urban for the abuse or specifically saying he's condoning it. He did have the opportunity to say something positive to Courtney & the children & he whiffed. He could have easily said something like, "this has been a learning opportunity for all of us to take accusations of domestic violence more serious to ensure we are protecting families." How do your PR people not prep you for something like that? I thing pride and ego got in the way.
Lastly, I fully believe Courtney is a mess as well as Zack. The only part I'm undecided is how much of her actions are a reaction to years of abuse? It's a question that cannot really be answered. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 24, 2018, 01:23:44 PM
forget Courtney Smith for a second.

Zach Smith is a flat out scumbag. Just pure filth. How in the hell Urban could not only hire him but keep him for almost a decade is crazy. The guy was a bad WR's coach. He could've been fired just for performance. Add to that all of his off-field BS- Urban gave him second chance after second chance. Urban let him get away with waaaaaaaay too much. Just makes zero sense. College football coaches spend one on one time with 18-21 year olds every day, not only coaching them up in football but also shaping them as men. To have total filth like Zach Smith around those young men is not only irresponsible it's just wrong. I could MAYBE see an argument if the guy was this amazing WR's coach but he wasn't. He was honestly a piss poor WR's coach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 24, 2018, 01:44:51 PM
Had he fired ZS in 2015, or never hired him, or reported him to compliance, it would not have helped the wife's situation at all.

Meyer's actions helped her in effect.  Perhaps someone can explain why Meyer's actions harmed her.
I'm not sure how anyone can say that with conviction.  Would not have helped at all? How do you know? Sometimes it takes someone's life hitting bottom, before they realize they need to change or get help. It's seen with addicts all the time.
Hell, I look at my own life. My obsession with my work and my career probably blew up my first marriage. It took an ugly divorce and life hitting bottom to evaluate how I lived life and made changes. 
Now, that guarantees nothing in this situation. It does not mean that ZS getting fired or never hired changes a single thing in that dynamic or family. We cannot say that with 100% conviction or confidence, but it's possible. It could have easily gone the opposite direction and created a more abusive and volatile situation as well. We just don't know. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 24, 2018, 02:07:26 PM
(1) Did you not read my post? I said by my reading of the contract, I am not sure I would have reported it to compliance, Which is what the report said about Smith and Meyer. They believed that the didn't have to report it because there was no arrest, but they monitored it to see where it went. The board made it clear that even if no arrest it has to be reported.
I think that was a cop-out by the board. You have a coach and an AD, both making boatloads of money, and you don't train them on what their actual requirements are? Heck, at my job, mid-level managers have to take classes every two years on this. We were taught, in no uncertain terms, "if you see anything, report it--even if you don't think it's serious, even if you don't want to get anyone in trouble... report it."
I think Urban and Gene didn't want to get Zach in trouble, so they tried as hard as they could to avoid reporting it. When this blew up, the resorted to an excuse of "well we didn't think it was required because no charges were filed". You think they'd get away with that if it was about a player? 
I find it really hard to believe that at no time were they trained on what their reporting requirements were. Especially after Penn State, where Paterno reported it up to his AD and then wiped his hands of it. 
You may believe this was a failure of training by OSU on what Gene and Urban's requirements were. I think it was the school claiming they didn't adequately train as a way to excuse their lack of reporting, but I don't buy that Gene and Urban were honestly able to say they didn't think the report was required.

Quote
(2) So you, like bwarbiany, whose comment I was responding to, believe that the compliance department that is designed to determine if University and NCAA policy, is better able to determine whether DV happened than the police and/or the DA. The police and the DA do not use the strictest standard of guilt to bring charges, that is for the final arbiter, the courts. The police and the DA only determine if there is enough evidence to bring charges.
I think there's a difference between the police's response to allegations and the university's response. The university might evaluate the evidence, note that there might not be enough evidence to clear the legal bar, but believe that university policies have not been followed and recommend action. Or they could have simply evaluated the situation, and in the absence of formal charges realized that Zach's behavior was a risk to the university and recommended action. 
And I'd say they're in better position to do that than the coach and AD, regardless of whether the evidence supports a formal legal charge of DV. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 24, 2018, 03:09:47 PM
Had he fired ZS in 2015, or never hired him, or reported him to compliance, it would not have helped the wife's situation at all.

Meyer's actions helped her in effect.  Perhaps someone can explain why Meyer's actions harmed her.
there's absolutely no way to know how anything would have helped or hurt Courtney's situation
I'm sure Urban and his wife made some guesses along the way, but there's no way to know.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 24, 2018, 03:57:44 PM
That's the  only redeeming factor Meyer has in this whole thing.As big as a bullshitter as I always felt he was I believe he thought they'd straighten things out.He knew if Zach got fired things would be bad for them financially - at least in the future.However that is not an excuse for his sherking his duties at Media days or not issuing an ultimatum years back
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 24, 2018, 04:02:45 PM
To have total filth like Zach Smith around those young men is not only irresponsible it's just wrong. I could MAYBE see an argument if the guy was this amazing WR's coach but he wasn't. He was honestly a piss poor WR's coach.
I don't recall players singling him out.I wasn't found of the tweeting crap.IMO it boils down to two things - he either had Urbans Party Pictures or he recruited rather well.But ya Urban brought this on himself - and unfortunately the University
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: ELA on August 24, 2018, 04:08:49 PM
forget Courtney Smith for a second.

Zach Smith is a flat out scumbag. Just pure filth. How in the hell Urban could not only hire him but keep him for almost a decade is crazy. The guy was a bad WR's coach. He could've been fired just for performance. Add to that all of his off-field BS- Urban gave him second chance after second chance. Urban let him get away with waaaaaaaay too much. Just makes zero sense. College football coaches spend one on one time with 18-21 year olds every day, not only coaching them up in football but also shaping them as men. To have total filth like Zach Smith around those young men is not only irresponsible it's just wrong. I could MAYBE see an argument if the guy was this amazing WR's coach but he wasn't. He was honestly a piss poor WR's coach.
Not that it should matter, but I thought he was an amazing recruiter, and they just kind of "hid" him as a WR coach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 04:12:19 PM
Financially, having an ex-husband lose his job is generally not a good thing.  Emotionally etc. it's hard to see how that would be good for the Smith's.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 24, 2018, 05:02:17 PM

(2) So you, like bwarbiary, whose comment I was responding to, believe that the compliance department that is designed to determine if University and NCAA policy, is better able to determine whether DV happened than the police and/or the DA. The police and the DA do not use the strictest standard of guilt to bring charges, that is for the final arbiter, the courts. The police and the DA only determine if there is enough evidence to bring charges.

I never said that Compliance is better equipped than the criminal justice system. I did imply they are *differently* equipped though and am happy to explain why having that is crucial.
Again, the criminal justice system fails to convict (or even charge) an unacceptably high fraction of true abusers. That is: Not Guilty and Innocent are not the same idea. This is a necessary evil of needing to overcome the "reasonable doubt" burden of proof. Our system uses that burden because criminal guilt and jail time are so costly that the justice system must be deeply invested in avoiding wrongful convictions. Even if using that standard means that many true victims will be failed in the process. Put another way: DAs rarely gamble by bringing cases they don't fully expect to win - even if they presume guilt.
For this reason, it's essential that the modern world have other mechanisms to (1) punish the accused (2) in manners less extreme than jail time (3) under lesser burdens of proof than "reasonable doubt" when (4) guilt is likely but (5) not so well documented as to make a prosecutor's case easy. And facilitating this is precisely the place for departments like Compliance.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 05:16:53 PM
Presuming this had been reported to Compliance, what steps could they/would they have taken?

Do they have the power to fire Smith?  Otherwise penalize him?  Make recommendations?

Or are they limited solely to saying "No violations of NCAA rules here."?

I don't know.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 05:19:30 PM
https://compliance.osu.edu/

The Athletic Compliance Office is committed to a comprehensive compliance program that educates its constituents about the importance of adhering to NCAA, Big Ten Conference, and institutional rules. Our goal is to create a “compliance conscience” within the University and throughout the community. Maintaining a commitment to compliance ensures institutional control over the Department of Athletics and furthers the mission of The Ohio State University.
To ensure institutional control and to uphold the integrity of the Department, the Athletic Compliance Office is charged with the following tasks:


The enforcement item suggests they have power to do stuff more than recommend.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 24, 2018, 06:10:18 PM
Urb tweets a pretty classy apology to Courtney Smith

https://twitter.com/OSUCoachMeyer
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Cincydawg on August 24, 2018, 06:20:26 PM
Obviously, a contract clause added this past April should not govern decisions made in 2015.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 24, 2018, 06:37:54 PM
Urb tweets a pretty classy apology to Courtney Smith

https://twitter.com/OSUCoachMeyer
 "I was taught at a very young age that if I ever hit a woman, I would be kicked out of the house and never welcomed back. I have the same rule in my house and in the Football Program at Ohio State. “

Are you kidding me? How can he possibly make that statement? He employed and covered for a guy that broke that exact rule for 9 year. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 06:52:37 PM
"I was taught at a very young age that if I ever hit a woman, I would be kicked out of the house and never welcomed back. I have the same rule in my house and in the Football Program at Ohio State. “

Are you kidding me? How can he possibly make that statement? He employed and covered for a guy that broke that exact rule for 9 year.
Easily.   That is what he believed. Haven’t you figured this part out yet SM?
He does not believe he hit her.  I am certain that he has reasons and evidence to feel that way. Doesn’t  mean he is right and I agree. The Gene Smith attorney statement was pretty clear. Also, the commitee- who believed him that he does not believe it.  
There is a lot more here- you can just tell.  
Besides the obvious  legal reasons he cannot apologize for her suffering from violence, why do you think this statement says nothing about that specifically but rather refers to “what she went through”
Am I saying I agree- no.   I wouldn’t say anything if I were him because he is now in a no-win situation. True or false the narrative was created by the accusations themselves as far as the domestic violence girls and that’s how it will stay forever and yes that is because of our rush to judgment and lynch mob natality in society
And don’t take that to mean I think he didn’t do anything wrong, I’ve already said I would have fired him just for you Racing text on his phone.    
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 24, 2018, 07:06:09 PM
Meyer is possibly a pathological liar and convinced himself into believing things that fit his current agenda. 

Again, how can he believe it? As a reminder, he and his wife were counseling the couple as they told everyone a few weeks ago after the abuse in 2009.

I think Meyer could convince himself he once walked on water. He and Kim jung Un should hang out and compare accomplishments as long as Meyer doesn’t have any more heart problems or possibly forgets his accomplishments from temporary amnesia.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 07:39:17 PM
Meyer is possibly a pathological liar and convinced himself into believing things that fit his current agenda.

Again, how can he believe it? As a reminder, he and his wife were counseling the couple as they told everyone a few weeks ago after the abuse in 2009.

I think Meyer could convince himself he once walked on water. He and Kim jung Un should hang out and compare accomplishments as long as Meyer doesn’t have any more heart problems or possibly forgets his accomplishments from temporary amnesia.
Well,  you now sounds like you’ve lost your mind. 
I am not saying he did or did not get her. But to stop and think for a minute with an on biased mind. One person says he hit her. Virtually every other entity that can wait in on it says he did not. And that includes the police and apparently may have been a well-known thing around campus if you read closely Jean Smith’s attorney’s statement about multiple false reporting.   I am not saying he did or did not get her. But to stop and think for a minute with an on biased mind. One person says he hit her. Virtually every other entity that can wait in on it says he did not. And that includes the police and apparently may have been a well known thing around campus if you read closely Jean Smith’s attorney’s statement about multiple false reporting  
If your own coaches tell you they see it different and the police tell you they don’t see it that way and now others we don’t need to know now probably weigh in and said he didn’t have no if you’re on coaches tell you they see it different and the police tell you they don’t see it that way and now others we don’t need to know now probably wait in and said it didn’t happen That way – it’s not unreasonable to believe it.  
I think it is fairly obvious that there are a lot of people close to the situation that don’t believe it besides just him and I’m sure there are many that do. Are they all crazy idiots or are you saying just urban Meyer?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 07:40:34 PM
Well,  you now sounds like you’ve lost your mind.
I am not saying he did or did not get her. But to stop and think for a minute with an on biased mind. One person says he hit her. Virtually every other entity that can wait in on it says he did not. And that includes the police and apparently may have been a well-known thing around campus if you read closely Jean Smith’s attorney’s statement about multiple false reporting.   I am not saying he did or did not get her. But to stop and think for a minute with an on biased mind. One person says he hit her. Virtually every other entity that can wait in on it says he did not. And that includes the police and apparently may have been a well known thing around campus if you read closely Jean Smith’s attorney’s statement about multiple false reporting  
If your own coaches tell you they see it different and the police tell you they don’t see it that way and now others we don’t need to know now probably weigh in and said he didn’t have no if you’re on coaches tell you they see it different and the police tell you they don’t see it that way and now others we don’t need to know now probably wait in and said it didn’t happen That way – it’s not unreasonable to believe it.  
I think it is fairly obvious that there are a lot of people close to the situation that don’t believe it besides just him and I’m sure there are many that do. Are they all crazy idiots or are you saying just urban Meyer?
 Also I will add, and this is an important distinction, that the investigative committee, people who are prosecutors for living in several cases, could not find an instance, not one, where they think she lied. 10,000 documents 60,000 texts 40 witnesses and they could not catch him in one lie?  But he’s a pathological liar? You’re the one who sounds a little crazy super Mario
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 07:43:56 PM
Meyer is possibly a pathological liar and convinced himself into believing things that fit his current agenda.

Again, how can he believe it? As a reminder, he and his wife were counseling the couple as they told everyone a few weeks ago after the abuse in 2009.

I think Meyer could convince himself he once walked on water. He and Kim jung Un should hang out and compare accomplishments as long as Meyer doesn’t have any more heart problems or possibly forgets his accomplishments from temporary amnesia.
Are you aware of where and when the 2009 incident happened?  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 24, 2018, 07:58:37 PM
10,000 documents 60,000 texts 40 witnesses and they could not catch him in one lie?  
You’re not serious. How many times has he been caught publicly lying in the last month? Oh wait, you believe it was an accidental mistruth or this weird memory loss thing.
C’mon. You’re a highly intelligent guy. You can’t be this blinded.
Do you also believe what he released today is the real urban Meyer? The real urban Meyer is the guy at the podium saying “who makes up a story like that?” The real one acts like a hostage reading a statement. The real one refuses to say to address the smith family or the abuse and apologizes to Buckeye nation. The person posting on twitter is his PR manager. The beginning and end of Meyer’s career will be very similar. Absolutely one of the best recruiters and most creative coaches in the game, but willing to use people and tell them what they want to hear to win them over and get his way. It’s nice to see most of the population outside of Ohio are finally seeing the man Myself and a bunch of BG Falcons learned about many years ago.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 24, 2018, 08:10:37 PM
 It’s nice to see most of the population outside of Ohio are finally seeing the man Myself and a bunch of BG Falcons learned about many years ago.
Back at you - you're a highly intelligent guy do you think everyone in the state is a Meyer Nutthugger?My friends that said Tressell has to go are saying the same thing about Meyer.Many Michigan fans defended Gibbons & Lewan but not the whole lot of them
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 08:17:34 PM
You’re not serious. How many times has he been caught publicly lying in the last month? Oh wait, you believe it was an accidental mistruth or this weird memory loss thing.
C’mon. You’re a highly intelligent guy. You can’t be this blinded.
Do you also believe what he released today is the real urban Meyer? The real urban Meyer is the guy at the podium saying “who makes up a story like that?” The real one acts like a hostage reading a statement. The real one refuses to say to address the smith family or the abuse and apologizes to Buckeye nation. The person posting on twitter is his PR manager. The beginning and end of Meyer’s career will be very similar. Absolutely one of the best recruiters and most creative coaches in the game, but willing to use people and tell them what they want to hear to win them over and get his way. It’s nice to see most of the population outside of Ohio are finally seeing the man Myself and a bunch of BG Falcons learned about many years ago.
Yes.  The mob.  Climbing over each other to prove their leve of outrage is higher than the ass clown in the next station or website he competes with. Yeah, I am familiar with what society “thinks”
Kind of like what Jason Whitlock said.  Trying to kill masculinity, and football is the most highly visible thing- and this and Urban are just the latest vehicle. 
And that’s why they are willing to take one alleged victim’s story as gospel, but ignore the other evidence-including EVERY other person or department close to the situation 
No- I am not familiar with all these lies you speak of, and apparent neither was the commitee- who felt he lied about it covered up NOTHING.   Nothing.   He used bad judgement- no doubt.  But the same people who say he put winning first as the reason admit ZS was a shitty coach in their next sentence.  Was it loyalty or winning?
No-Clearly Meyer doesn’t really feel he owes her an apology- and clearly he has reasons.  Doesn’t make him right   He knows more than he can say I am sure.  
I was originally saying he should be fired for not telling compliance and deleting more than 1 yr old texts.  
Now that I know that both he and Smith openly discussed it, The title IX officer knew because that’s who the police called and HR was brought in- and knowing Compliance is for NCAA matters, I can forgive that.  But not for Smith.  
The fact that Smith is not the target of this vitriol is all the proof you need of the mob outrage.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 24, 2018, 08:18:30 PM
Back at you - you're a highly intelligent guy do you think everyone in the state is a Meyer Nutthugger?
Definitely not. Most of my close friends and family are diehard Buckeye fans. The ones that have closely followed the story are embarrassed by what’s going on. I feel bad for them and the Buckeye fans here as almost all are genuinely good guys.
Some of them, the more causal fans, are screaming that Meyer didn’t abuse her so it’s BS he’s suspended. Tough to talk rationally to that group.
The rest seem to be the ultimate optimists, the ones that always see the best in people and hope for the best. I get it, but I think that group is ignoring giant red flags.
You’ve had very reasonable takes. The good news is football starts soon. This nonsense will die down and you can get back to focusing on football.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 08:29:18 PM
Definitely not. Most of my close friends and family are diehard Buckeye fans. The ones that have closely followed the story are embarrassed by what’s going on. I feel bad for them and the Buckeye fans here as almost all are genuinely good guys.
Some of them, the more causal fans, are screaming that Meyer didn’t abuse her so it’s BS he’s suspended. Tough to talk rationally to that group.
The rest seem to be the ultimate optimists, the ones that always see the best in people and hope for the best. I get it, but I think that group is ignoring giant red flags.
You’ve had very reasonable takes. The good news is football starts soon. This nonsense will die down and you can get back to focusing on football.
Is my take reasonable? That he deserves to be fired for keeping a douce on his staff due some warped sense of loyalty and for deleting texts. But also- any narrative that he covered up or lied about DV- are at best, not even slightly proven and likely downright false.  And the outrage is mostly based on that false narrative.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 24, 2018, 08:42:44 PM
Yes.  The mob.  Climbing over each other to prove their leve of outrage is higher than the ass clown in the next station or website he competes with. Yeah, I am familiar with what society “thinks”
Kind of like what Jason Whitlock said.  Trying to kill masculinity, and football is the most highly visible thing- and this and Urban are just the latest vehicle.
And that’s why they are willing to take one alleged victim’s story as gospel, but ignore the other evidence-including EVERY other person or department close to the situation
No- I am not familiar with all these lies you speak of, and apparent neither was the commitee- who felt he lied about it covered up NOTHING.   Nothing.   He used bad judgement- no doubt.  But the same people who say he put winning first as the reason admit ZS was a shitty coach in their next sentence.  Was it loyalty or winning?
No-Clearly Meyer doesn’t really feel he owes her an apology- and clearly he has reasons.  Doesn’t make him right   He knows more than he can say I am sure.  
I was originally saying he should be fired for not telling compliance and deleting more than 1 yr old texts.  
Now that I know that both he and Smith openly discussed it, The title IX officer knew because that’s who the police called and HR was brought in- and knowing Compliance is for NCAA matters, I can forgive that.  But not for Smith.  
The fact that Smith is not the target of this vitriol is all the proof you need of the mob outrage.  
You’ve based most of your belief this entire time that Urban didn’t lie at media day and had a side conversation with other reporters and his answer that most of the world heard was just misunderstood.
Maybe it’s time you watch this:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IEccAVs2tF0&feature=youtu.be (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IEccAVs2tF0&feature=youtu.be)
Still believe he hasn’t lied?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 24, 2018, 08:45:07 PM
so, there was no press conference today

Urban issued a statement to the press and/or via twitter regarding his press conference a couple days ago?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 24, 2018, 08:53:12 PM
Is my take reasonable? That he deserves to be fired for keeping a douce on his staff due some warped sense of loyalty and for deleting texts. But also- any narrative that he covered up or lied about DV- are at best, not even slightly proven and likely downright false.  And the outrage is mostly based on that false narrative.  
No, I don’t think that’s a reasonable take at all. Not even slightly proven? Buckeye blinders are on my friend. You’re choosing to miss the truth completely. Or maybe you had a brain cyst and forgot it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 10:14:03 PM
You’ve based most of your belief this entire time that Urban didn’t lie at media day and had a side conversation with other reporters and his answer that most of the world heard was just misunderstood.
Maybe it’s time you watch this:
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IEccAVs2tF0&feature=youtu.be (https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=IEccAVs2tF0&feature=youtu.be)
Still believe he hasn’t lied?
Seen that long ago.  Where is the lie?  Did you not read the report and his texts   The night before asking Jean Smith and and others for advice On what to say because he could not remember that incident?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 10:19:46 PM
No, I don’t think that’s a reasonable take at all. Not even slightly proven? Buckeye blinders are on my friend. You’re choosing to miss the truth completely. Or maybe you had a brain cyst and forgot it.
Talk about binders my God super. I guess we should all be leave you over the committee that went over all that information and all those texts? Because that was their conclusion
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 24, 2018, 10:23:45 PM
He said it again on that clip you just posted. There was a lot of he said she said and the police gave him no reason to even consider doing anything different.

What you seem to be missing is the fact that I said 1000 times I would fire him for deleting his old phone text, that’s reason enough for me. 

Has their beenDV?   Do you know that for sure since you seem to know all 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Mdot21 on August 24, 2018, 10:29:42 PM
my bet is Urban will retire after this year.

people always talk about Harbaugh being a guy who is job hopper and flames out. I think Urban is more in that vein. Bowling Green two years, Utah two years. Goes to Florida for 6 years, quits, unquits for a year, then quits again.

His time at Ohio State might just be coming to an end. Talk about stress. The last month must've been the most stressful of his professional life. He did NOT look like a happy camper at that presser. He looked pissssssssed.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 24, 2018, 10:56:57 PM
As I said before the best $$ an Ohio State donor could burn right now would be to send Zach smith an all expenses paid vacation to some remote cabana in the Maldives with no cell or internet service. Give him $1,000 for every day he stays off the grid.

https://twitter.com/coachzachsmith/status/1032815834832547843?s=21 (https://twitter.com/coachzachsmith/status/1032815834832547843?s=21)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 24, 2018, 10:58:06 PM
that's why I was asking about the delivery of the statement today

just written?

wondering about his facial expression and body language

I agree, this pisses him off completely.

Looks like Urban wants to kick ass on the media, the AD, the committee, Zach, and anyone else he gets close too
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 24, 2018, 11:01:47 PM
As I said before the best $$ an Ohio State donor could burn right now would be to send Zach smith an all expenses paid vacation to some remote cabana in the Maldives with no cell or internet service. Give him $1,000 for every day he stays off the grid.
ya can't fix stupid
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 06:02:33 AM
One person says he hit her. 
Two people. Courtney and her mom - with both being documented in texts. 
And Courtney's texts include ostensible admission of guilt from Zach ("I know"). 
I admit her mom's texts are complicated. They come from before the estrangement when she clearly used language expressing she was convinced that Zach had abused her. I know after the estrangement that she gave a contrarian take to Snook (but only Snook?). Even then, it's worth acknowledging the timeline that not only did she agree with her daughter before Snook but, then, after the Snook interview she was also happy to provide these old texts despite the fact that it contradicted her own contrarian take.
That alone called Snook's reporting into question. And how the investigation finished only doubled us down on that.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 06:05:34 AM
10,000 documents 60,000 texts 40 witnesses and they could not catch him in one lie?  But he’s a pathological liar?
How many of those were the texts that he conspired with his Director of Football Operations to delete?
When one's first compulsion at the beginning of an investigation is to destroy evidence ... it's forever fair to speculate about their lying.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 07:19:04 AM
Seen that long ago.  Where is the lie?  Did you not read the report and his texts   The night before asking Jean Smith and and others for advice On what to say because he could not remember that incident?
He knows “nothing about 2015.” Let that sink in. I called the people back at the office and they knew nothing about it.
C’mon man. Put this in context. This was long before the suspension and investigation and before anyone was poking around. This dude is literally lying to make it go away. 
Yes, I’ve read that you’ve posted multiple times you’d fire him for deleting texts, but you’re acting like he did nothing else wrong. You don’t delete texts unless there’s something to find. He’s not an honest guy. Never has been. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 25, 2018, 08:00:17 AM
my bet is Urban will retire after this year.

people always talk about Harbaugh being a guy who is job hopper and flames out. I think Urban is more in that vein. Bowling Green two years, Utah two years. Goes to Florida for 6 years, quits, unquits for a year, then quits again.

His time at Ohio State might just be coming to an end. Talk about stress. The last month must've been the most stressful of his professional life. He did NOT look like a happy camper at that presser. He looked pissssssssed.
Agreed, only I wouldn’t be surprised if it came sooner.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 25, 2018, 08:16:43 AM
How many of those were the texts that he conspired with his Director of Football Operations to delete?
When one's first compulsion at the beginning of an investigation is to destroy evidence ... it's forever fair to speculate about their lying.
Not sure your context at this juncture?  If a debate is like a chess game, your working on the Knight you took at the beginning.
The texts are reason enough to terminate, but I add the general concept of inaction versus just warning, on terminating ZS.
The texts bother me the most. What or why are you hiding?  Not reporting to compliance, bothers me only from the Gene Smith angle, now that the report shows that Title IV person knew, and HR WAS informed.   If there was not clarity around compliance needing in, which is understandable for a criminal case, I hold Gene sole responsible for that. For god sakes your the AD!
To me, the situation is intuitively easy to see here.  He probably deleted them because he knew his wife had sent him some texts some time ago, probably knew they were going to not help. But, the thing that nobody, besides the committee- who danced around it mostly- is not talking about is that Meyer, his wife, Gene Smith, and many others- simply had enough of their own evidence to question CS credibility.
They simply didn’t want to fire ZS based on the evidence they had ( police reports, etc)
Didn’t the incident in09 happen at Meyers  house, after a dinner party? And were there witnesses?   I think this only contributed.  
If you want to blast any man for not taking a DV claim as gospel, just because it is made, then yes, blast away.   My gut tells me many and possibly most of the people criticizing Urban would have struggled with that part of this....the claims of DV.  It’s just political suicide to admit it.  Again, you don’t hear the talking heads screaming for Gene’s scalp..   why is that?...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 10:13:46 AM
Gene did recommend that Urbs fire Zach a few years back.And he declined.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 10:17:27 AM
my bet is Urban will retire after this year.He did NOT look like a happy camper at that presser. He looked pissssssssed.  

I hope you're right but I think he's smug enough he might stick around just to prove a point.What ever that point might be.If he's pissed it's because his speil has blown up in his face and circles around and bit him in the ass
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 10:28:11 AM
Yes, I’ve read that you’ve posted multiple times you’d fire him for deleting texts, but you’re acting like he did nothing else wrong. You don’t delete texts unless there’s something to find. He’s not an honest guy. Never has been.
Super if you're going that route McMurphy deleted/edited his facebook acct I don't know how many times.Meyer is a bad look with his flip flopping and ignoring Zach's juvenile behavior.He evidently wasn't liked by the staff as he was really a very bad coach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 10:46:08 AM
 Ramzy from 11 Warriors chimes in here,for some reason I couldn't copy/paste to over here.Scroll down about 2/3rds and he lays out 9 points

https://www.elevenwarriors.com/forum/ohio-state-football/2018/08/95643/could-osu-beat-writers-have-done-more-to-prevent-zach-smith-fiasco#comment-3643942
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 11:23:13 AM
Super if you're going that route McMurphy deleted/edited his facebook acct I don't know how many times.Meyer is a bad look with his flip flopping and ignoring Zach's juvenile behavior.He evidently wasn't liked by the staff as he was really a very bad coach.
Do you think it’s the same? I’m asking honestly, not being argumentative. I see it as a reporter correcting errors after obtaining information that disputes a report vs someone trying to hide evidence. For me it’s not the same.
As for the article, I think if someone reports it, they’re cut off from access. 850 in Cleveland has never had UM on the station and they’re the home of the Buckeyes in Cleveland. Calling out an assistant coach would not have gone over well for any paper our outlet. Look what happen to mcMurphy. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 11:55:09 AM
McMurphy had run with and plastered some assumptions that he retracted.Meyer may have deep sixed everything for the sake of covering up.According to an IT guy if court ordered that's not hard to get back that info.As someone else said would you wan't someone else reading your private exchanges - even sweet nothings to the MRS.Lot of people say they wipe there's clean once a week.Regardless the information can be retrieved.McMurphy had no problem wiping the snot out of his vault though.Kind of a hypocrite.I don't like Meyer because he's a liar not because of anything that went on with the Smiths.He gave both of them enough time to come correct.He owed the University a fair shake he had already given the Smiths more time than they deserved
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 12:21:56 PM
Pretty fair take. Only thing I’ll add is Meyer was aski g to wipe his phone when the Smith report came out and I’m guessing he wasn’t thinking about hiding sweet nothings to shelley.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 12:25:37 PM
Not sure your context at this juncture?  If a debate is like a chess game, your working on the Knight you took at the beginning.
The texts are reason enough to terminate, but I add the general concept of inaction versus just warning, on terminating ZS.
The texts bother me the most. What or why are you hiding?  Not reporting to compliance, bothers me only from the Gene Smith angle, now that the report shows that Title IV person knew, and HR WAS informed.   If there was not clarity around compliance needing in, which is understandable for a criminal case, I hold Gene sole responsible for that. For god sakes your the AD!
To me, the situation is intuitively easy to see here.  He probably deleted them because he knew his wife had sent him some texts some time ago, probably knew they were going to not help. But, the thing that nobody, besides the committee- who danced around it mostly- is not talking about is that Meyer, his wife, Gene Smith, and many others- simply had enough of their own evidence to question CS credibility.
They simply didn’t want to fire ZS based on the evidence they had ( police reports, etc)
Didn’t the incident in09 happen at Meyers  house, after a dinner party? And were there witnesses?   I think this only contributed.  
If you want to blast any man for not taking a DV claim as gospel, just because it is made, then yes, blast away.   My gut tells me many and possibly most of the people criticizing Urban would have struggled with that part of this....the claims of DV.  It’s just political suicide to admit it.  Again, you don’t hear the talking heads screaming for Gene’s scalp..   why is that?...
I don't know chess and didn't know I was still part of a debate. I just leapt at what appeared to be Super saying Urban has lied and you calling that mistaken. If I misunderstood and you have been acknowledging Urban's dishonesty, then I jumped for no reason and should apologize.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 12:30:53 PM
Super if you're going that route McMurphy deleted/edited his facebook acct I don't know how many times.Meyer is a bad look with his flip flopping and ignoring Zach's juvenile behavior.He evidently wasn't liked by the staff as he was really a very bad coach.
About that, we learned a key thing:
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 12:39:56 PM
According to an IT guy if court ordered that's not hard to get back that info.
It's true. Whether on the cloud (iMessage) or by device forensics, it can be retrieved. But only with a court order, and we should doubt that will ever happen (and even if it does, that Urban will still have that device). An FOIA request wouldn't bring this up either. Not without a court order. Which is really unlikely. 
Having the technology to get them (we do) and still not seeing them (we won't) in no way absolves the conspiracy with Voltolini or deletion or tips the balances to say there's probably nothing there.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 12:52:36 PM
About that, we learned a key thing:
  • After McMurphy learned about the felonious arrest in 2015 but hours/days before he published, the Powell police department, 3 years after the fact, edited the file, claiming terminology had changed, and now filed the event with the arrest box being *unchecked* (very weird and poorly explained on Powell's part)
  • So that's not on McMurphy. And even when we thought it was, he left an edit trail (Facebook logs/publishes edit histories automatically).
  • So not only was McMurphy ultimately proven correct, even before that, it wasn't as shady as his detractors promised
It also looks like mcMurphy released the original copy showing it was checked as an arrest. There was some confusion initially because there didn’t appear to be a copy of it saying there was an arrest but he has posted that and put it to rest
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 01:00:38 PM
Wow. I didn't know that.
If after all that copy exists, the PPD may yet face heat. Whether Powell has to answer for being sketchy will be up to lawyers.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 02:06:51 PM
  • So not only was McMurphy ultimately proven correct, even before that, it wasn't as shady as his detractors promised


I forget/don't know all the particulars(really I don't)Fox Sports wasn't letting McMurphy off the hook.Saw separate interviews with Brady Quinn and another with Doug Gottlieb they were both questioning the methods/accuracy/motives on some of his reporting
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 02:17:15 PM
I don't know about the interview where Gottlieb was harsh towards McMurphy, but I do know of the one where Gottlieb nonstop praised McMurphy (https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/2018-08-01-brett-mcmurphy-talks-timeline-of-urban-meyer-zach-smith-report/):

In any event, the list of things against McMurphy across these last few weeks has been:

The OSU investigation, presser, and now this news about the Powell PD have fully vindicated McMurphy. He was the most aggressive, consistent and trustworthy journalist involved and in light of the Powell mini-scandal, everything he published remains accurate.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 25, 2018, 02:59:34 PM
I don't know about the interview where Gottlieb was harsh towards McMurphy, but I do know of the one where Gottlieb nonstop praised McMurphy (https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/2018-08-01-brett-mcmurphy-talks-timeline-of-urban-meyer-zach-smith-report/):

In any event, the list of things against McMurphy across these last few weeks has been:
  • He reported a felony arrest that the Powell PD says never happened (which we now know is only because they recently went back and edited the record)
  • and "ooooh, but like what are his motives, man"

The OSU investigation, presser, and now this news about the Powell PD have fully vindicated McMurphy. He was the most aggressive, consistent and trustworthy journalist involved and in light of the Powell mini-scandal, everything he published remains accurate.

I am laughing.  I can’t rven respond. This guy has been proven to be on a personal vendetta. 
Any one who would publish one side of a story and interview one person- the alleged victim- is not consistent or a journalist. Sorry. 
And his personal opinion tweets validate that. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 03:45:28 PM
I am laughing.  I can’t rven respond. This guy has been proven to be on a personal vendetta.
Any one who would publish one side of a story and interview one person- the alleged victim- is not consistent or a journalist. Sorry.
And his personal opinion tweets validate that.
How exactly has that been proven? It’s odd you think that’s proven but Meyer hasn’t been a proven liar. 
I would argue that McMurphy was simply reporting a story until Meyer obnoxiously showed him up in a press conference and tried to embarrass him in front of his peers.
You and I have seen eye to eye on so many topics for years, but we’re the sun and the moon on this one. Had to happen eventually.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 03:53:55 PM
McMurphy only published documents or interviews with people who provided their names. It's good to have the capacity to laugh, but don't pretend that one-sidedness is a crux that only you have avoided.
I mean ... of all reporters, you supported Snook instead. A voice box for Meyer who was not only one-sided in trying to absolve Zach Smith of blame but has also been the most contradicted and proven incorrect journalist in the telling of this story.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 04:01:56 PM
There's also room for another point, though I think most people misunderstand the difference between guilt and criminal guilt and find it unpopular:
So long as what is reported is true, objectivity as a standard is terribly overrated. Especially in stories where it is well documented that anyone has acted like Zach. Once it's established that a man has serially abused his wife, holding the publication until he that guy finally responds with "I didn't do it" or no comment is neither important nor is it an essential step of good journalism. 
Fact:
Conclusion:
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Reyd on August 25, 2018, 04:20:12 PM
Inaccurate statements are a subset of Lies. A more accurate accessment maybe. Lies can take many forms, but I will stand by the first sentence.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 25, 2018, 04:20:55 PM
Reporter became part of the story. 

After his  initial report, he had a counter punch released each time his targets ( Meyer, OSU) or anything or anyone supporting them, released a statement.

Yesterday he tweets that Meyers apology validates CS’ claims.

Lol.  Go ahead, defend that as a journalist.   I am not exaggerating when I say that makes me laugh.   Your anti Meyer bias glows brightly.  

You can’t say the same for me.  I would have fired the guy.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 04:38:23 PM
We are well past Meyer. The investigators learned more than enough to punish and he was punished. That's done now - with a bow on top and everything. In fact, aside from the subordinate we learned Zach had a sexual relationship with (who was then transfered), I'm pretty sure everything has a bow on it.
You sometimes act like you agree but other times switch and become strangely defensive as if Zach Smith got a raw deal. I'm jumping in to support McMurphy in a conversation that is McMurphy versus Zach and Snook. And of these, you appear to be preferring Zach and Snook.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 04:42:39 PM
Reporter became part of the story.  
That's it?

After his  initial report, he had a counter punch released each time his targets ( Meyer, OSU) or anything or anyone supporting them, released a statement.  
When at first we were fooled to think Snook got some landmark scoop with Courtney's mom, you can sure as hell bet that it's relevant for McMurphy to go and have a nice interview with Courtney's mom where she contradicts that and shows text message documentation to support it:
(https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/38965522_2059418167415570_3961040688316940288_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=d24ca23a7e68edb9f5786fc031d566fa&oe=5BEE6549)
Yesterday he tweets that Meyers apology validates CS’ claims.  
Why does that matter?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 04:49:40 PM
The OSU investigation, presser, and now this news about the Powell PD have fully vindicated McMurphy. He was the most aggressive, consistent and trustworthy journalist involved and in light of the Powell mini-scandal, everything he published remains accurate.
Bullshit proven accurate by who?You? he never,ever attempted to publish an opposing rebuttall nada,zero,zilch.Jesus now your taking liberties as much as McMurphy,Zach,Urban or Courtney.I'm not defending Zach or anything but there is a reason this yapping jackel wasn't employed until the last month..Earle Bruce never met with Courtney - his daughter,Zachs mom did in 2009.
https://myfox28columbus.com/news/local/powell-police-chief-refuses-to-release-courtney-and-zach-smith-2015-domestic-abuse-report from the Police Chief himself - he'll open the records if the court orders him to because of a recent enactment of Marcy's Law.Why haven't they pursued this if it's such a smashing slam dunk.I'm sure with McMurphy's backgound in yellow journalism he's got a few Attorney's on speed dial.Fire Urban,jail Zach I don't care but you trying to turn this trampled cabbage leaf into Eward R Murrow is laughable
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 05:04:52 PM
https://thespun.com/college-football/courtney-smith-releases-new-statement-on-comments-made-by-her-mother


https://thespun.com/college-football/courtney-smiths-mother-continues-to-speak-out-in-defense-of-zach-smith

https://247sports.com/Article/Courtney-Smith-responds-to-mothers-vindictive-falsehoods-regarding-Ohio-State-domestic-violence-scandal-120741828/

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 05:32:10 PM
proven accurate by who?
The McMurphy narrative has been corroborated by the OSU investigators and what we've learned about the Powell PD going back to edit Zach's 2015 arrest report in July of 2018.
None of this would have happened without McMurphy. Zach would still have his job. We'd never have learned about Meyer's mishandling.
Meanwhile the only fly that ever fell in McMurphy's reporting's ointment was that for a while Snook's report from Courtney's mom was believed as damning ... but that only lasted until McMurphy responded by interviewing Ms. Carano and got her to share texts that contradicted her own Snook interview by documenting a conversation in which Ms. Carano peppered Zach with statements about his abuse of Courtney. Which apparently Snook never asked about (or he did ask but excluded it because he felt they were counter to the pro-Zach narrative he wanted)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 05:35:43 PM
Courtney told McMurphy that "she has been estranged from her mother for about two months."


“I still love my mom, but I’m really hurt she has chosen not to support me during this difficult time,” Courtney told McMurphy.


Sorry you objectivity is swirling the drain.No it wasn't that quote was taken after McMurphy talked to Miss Carano
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 25, 2018, 05:36:51 PM
While I do think McMurphy enjoys trolling OSU fans, I dn't see anything particularly shady on his part.  He did get some pretty crucial information wrong, and I don't find his excuse particularly great - (the box was checked!)  He obviously didn't do any sort of follow up to make sure he was right.  It is what it is.

Also, the thing with the mom is weird.  That she supported her daughter years ago and doesn't now is not some sort of proof that she is lying or has an ax to grind.  

In any event, go Bucks.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 05:38:39 PM
Here's the document that McMurphy copied before the Powell police sketchily edited it. Your attention should be drawn to box "F: Arrest - Adult," which is checked:

(https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/39913669_2079164925440894_7061117472337821696_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=9c8b7077f0d59a30a6494a0d6c9dff2a&oe=5BF0E817)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 05:42:20 PM
While I do think McMurphy enjoys trolling OSU fans, I dn't see anything particularly shady on his part.  He did get some pretty crucial information wrong, and I don't find his excuse particularly great - (the box was checked!)  He obviously didn't do any sort of follow up to make sure he was right.  It is what it is.
I agree with all of this. He definitely has enjoyed the ride. Not sure why that should affect our interpretation of the information he presented. I'm only judging that information and am doing so as "accurate."
For your last sentence, though, I seriously doubt it's standard ops to check the public record, make copies, and then need to check again just in case. Historical files and years-old records should be static.
If I go check on some zoning ordinance for Bloomington from 1993 or go to the library and read the first line of Moby Dick, it would be reasonable for me to expect those things can't (or at least won't) change. Expecting me to "follow up to make sure" those documents are still the same is the thing that's unreasonable.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 05:49:22 PM
Again hire an attorney and Powell Police will open the records.Courtney would love to prove this as she would win if the landslide of evidence is the deal breaker that your angling to indicate.Did you read my link to Ramzy and the 11 Warriors,he opined that neither Zack or Courtney were particularly liked.McMurphy popped off that all the wives knew.Michelle Herman said she didn't or see any signs of abuse.Look I'm glad Zach's gone and only saddened by knowing Urban isn't following him.But this yodeling roach McMurphy is a walking/talking crime against Journalism
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 05:51:05 PM
Courtney told McMurphy that "she has been estranged from her mother for about two months."






“I still love my mom, but I’m really hurt she has chosen not to support me during this difficult time,” Courtney told McMurphy.






Sorry you objectivity is swirling the drain.No it wasn't that quote was taken after McMurphy talked to Miss Carano




I mean to be friendly but don't understand your point. Do you think these quotes are inconsistent with what I've said?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 05:55:39 PM
Did McMurphy edit any part of his report besides the arrest?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 05:55:57 PM
Again hire an attorney and Powell Police will open the records.Courtney would love to prove this as she would win if the landslide of evidence is the slam dunk that your angling to indicate.Did you read my link to Ramzy and the 11 Warriors,he opined that neither Zack or Courtney were particularly liked.McMurphy popped off that all the wives knew.Michelle Herman said she didn't or see any signs of abuse.Look I'm glad Zach's gone and only saddened by knowing Urban isn't following him.But this yodeling roach McMurphy is a walking/talking crime against Journalism
Again I mean to be friendly, but I don't know what conversation you think we are having. What would Courtney be suing the Powell Police for, and what evidence does she want from them that we don't already have? McMurphy copied a file with the arrest box checked. And then the Powell police changed that. And then McMurphy shared his copy to establish that the Powell PD did in fact change it recently so we weren't stuck taking him at his word.
I don't happen to think Courtney has any reason to sue the Powell PD. And if she did, I don't have any reason to expect we'd learn important new info.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 05:57:05 PM
Did McMurphy edit any part of his report besides the arrest?
I don't know, did he? I thought it was only this.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 25, 2018, 06:02:50 PM
Here's the document that McMurphy copied before the Powell police sketchily edited it. Your attention should be drawn to box "F: Arrest - Adult," which is checked:

(https://scontent-ort2-1.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/39913669_2079164925440894_7061117472337821696_n.jpg?_nc_cat=0&oh=9c8b7077f0d59a30a6494a0d6c9dff2a&oe=5BF0E817)
Right, I've seen it. Solely relying on whether that box is checked is IMO pretty shoddy reporting, given how easy it could have been to fact check. I've seen thousands of police reports and would not rely solely on those boxes over the other information in the report.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 06:05:25 PM
I don't know, did he? I thought it was only this.
I thought that was the change as well, which is why I’m a little confused. Some of the comments are painting him like a snake that provided a bunch of false information. In hindsight, it looks like his reporting was spot on since he has shown the original report, which is why I’m thinking maybe I missed something else he changed.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 06:06:12 PM
Again I mean to be friendly, but I don't know what conversation you think we are having. 
That's fine we've evidently crossed wires and are talking past each other.I'd love for it to go to court as I said I dunno 20 pages back.I just don't think either of the Smith's would be comfortable with the archives.And if Courtney could clean him out for everything - more power to her if she hasn't brought any of this out as her mom had said
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 06:11:09 PM
I thought that was the change as well, which is why I’m a little confused. Some of the comments are painting him like a snake that provided a bunch of false information. In hindsight, it looks like his reporting was spot on since he has shown the original report, which is why I’m thinking maybe I missed something else he changed.
I think Sam hit it on the head - OSU fans think that McMurphy trolled them, enjoyed trolling them, and they tolerate that least of all. Which is related to what HB wrote when he said that Brett inserted himself into the story. Maybe it's true. But I think it's also like twelfth in things that matter about his reports.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 06:13:25 PM
Right, I've seen it. Solely relying on whether that box is checked is IMO pretty shoddy reporting, given how easy it could have been to fact check. I've seen thousands of police reports and would not rely solely on those boxes over the other information in the report.
Is it common for police reports to change 3 years after incidents? I’m asking out of ignorance. If I obtained a police report, I would never think it was inaccurate, but that’s so out of the realm of my daily life that I’m not sure what’s common and uncommon.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 06:14:05 PM
It's been a weird thread. There was a pile of pages Wednesday night and Thursday where I felt like Nubbz and I or HB and I were just nodding along agreeing with nearly the totality of what each other was writing. 
And then there've been the other pages...
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 25, 2018, 06:16:34 PM
Is it common for police reports to change 3 years after incidents? I’m asking out of ignorance. If I obtained a police report, I would never think it was inaccurate, but that’s so out of the realm of my daily life that I’m not sure what’s common and uncommon.
That has been my expectation too. If a police officer, defense lawyer or prosecutor says otherwise though (basically that these files are often not trustworthy), then I'll agree that McMurphy could have done more to vet it. But even then, if normal folks outside the justice system don't know it, is it reasonable to expect journalists to?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on August 25, 2018, 06:24:57 PM
None of this would have happened without McMurphy. Zach would still have his job. We'd never have learned about Meyer's mishandling.
I don't think this statement is correct.
McMurphy claims it's because of him. His report and firing came within hours of each other, and both just days after they both received notification of Civil protection Order. I still think it was the release of the civil order (because of the criminal trespassing conviction) 11 Warriors and Columbus Dispatch were also reporting on the criminal trespass. This wasn't going to get covered up, even if Urban/OSU wanted to.
I am now in the camp the McMurphy is looking for scalps. After OSU released their finding, he is still calling for Urbans head to the point of misquoting the findings the university released.
https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/brett-mcmurphy-talks-ohio-state-press-conference-result-urban-meyer/
The quote starts off with "In the course of our review..." we found all this shitty stuff.
McMurphy in the interview alters the quote to be "Urban knew about..." all this shitty stuff. 
I think Urban had blinders on concerning Zach, I think he and Gene Smith blurred the line on what they should have done and what was done. I'm ok with suspension. (Pet peeve is that Urban's 3 weeks suspension ends up being 7 weeks, while Gene's is an actual 3, but that could just be petteyness on my part.)
Courtney Smith doesn't seem stable. I'm glad she is out of the abusive relationship.
Zach Smith is a POS. I think he lied, repeatedly to Urban, (and Gene.) An Urban didn't see through the lies, or had blinders on. 
I'm ready to be done with this and for Football to start. 7 days till OSU beats OSU!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 25, 2018, 06:26:44 PM
Is it common for police reports to change 3 years after incidents? I’m asking out of ignorance. If I obtained a police report, I would never think it was inaccurate, but that’s so out of the realm of my daily life that I’m not sure what’s common and uncommon.
Probably not, though that's not the full report nor the part that people would normally pay great attention to. There is typically multiple pages, including a summary of events. My understanding is that the Powell police are refusing to release that (though trying to follow that part of it has been difficult). Those boxes are part of a computer program, the cop has to go through a lot of them, and its not unheard of for mistakes to be made on them.
To be clear, I'm not accusing McMurphy of anything underhanded. I understand why he reported what he did. However, it would be pretty unusual for someone to be arrested on felony charges and no follow up in a court database to exist, which should have prompted McMurphy to check it a little harder.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 06:46:22 PM
None of this would have happened without McMurphy. Zach would still have his job. We'd never have learned about Meyer's mishandling.
Just wish Urban had vacated also.I believe he might have had he not bolted Gainesville already.The polluted rube played no small part in the mischief - bad look for the Boys in Scarlett & Gray
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 06:57:46 PM
Probably not, though that's not the full report nor the part that people would normally pay great attention to. There is typically multiple pages, including a summary of events. My understanding is that the Powell police are refusing to release that (though trying to follow that part of it has been difficult). Those boxes are part of a computer program, the cop has to go through a lot of them, and its not unheard of for mistakes to be made on them.
To be clear, I'm not accusing McMurphy of anything underhanded. I understand why he reported what he did. However, it would be pretty unusual for someone to be arrested on felony charges and no follow up in a court database to exist, which should have prompted McMurphy to check it a little harder.
I don’t think I’m understanding correctly. So he should have followed up harder, but people who subsequently followed up were refused the summary of events? Again, ignorance on my part and I’m asking more to learn.
Would a Sports reporter normally know what to ask for?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 07:01:09 PM
I think Urban had blinders on concerning Zach, I think he and Gene Smith blurred the line on what they should have done and what was done. I'm ok with suspension.
According to 11 Warriors GENE asked Urban to fire Z.Smith 3 yrs back evidently felt he could make things work.That and the fact Meyer couldn't be bothered to prepare a statement for Media days is grounds for dismissal IMO.The character of the Program & University has been terribly tarnished.It's not a coincidence he's done it before - he's a case study in narcissism.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 25, 2018, 07:56:45 PM
I don't think this statement is correct.
McMurphy claims it's because of him. His report and firing came within hours of each other, and both just days after they both received notification of Civil protection Order. I still think it was the release of the civil order (because of the criminal trespassing conviction) 11 Warriors and Columbus Dispatch were also reporting on the criminal trespass. This wasn't going to get covered up, even if Urban/OSU wanted to.
I am now in the camp the McMurphy is looking for scalps. After OSU released their finding, he is still calling for Urbans head to the point of misquoting the findings the university released.
https://foxsportsradio.iheart.com/content/brett-mcmurphy-talks-ohio-state-press-conference-result-urban-meyer/
The quote starts off with "In the course of our review..." we found all this shitty stuff.
McMurphy in the interview alters the quote to be "Urban knew about..." all this shitty stuff.
I think Urban had blinders on concerning Zach, I think he and Gene Smith blurred the line on what they should have done and what was done. I'm ok with suspension. (Pet peeve is that Urban's 3 weeks suspension ends up being 7 weeks, while Gene's is an actual 3, but that could just be petteyness on my part.)
Courtney Smith doesn't seem stable. I'm glad she is out of the abusive relationship.
Zach Smith is a POS. I think he lied, repeatedly to Urban, (and Gene.) An Urban didn't see through the lies, or had blinders on.
I'm ready to be done with this and for Football to start. 7 days till OSU beats OSU!
You are correct, that statement is so far from accurate.  And that’s my point here.
For Dudekd, look long and hard for evidence that I think ZS got a raw deal.  Ok, now that you see that never happened, I will summarize my position for you, which your false statement in Ty’s post proves:
- Zack is a total Douche.
- Meyer gave him too many second and third chances for the things he KNEW such as the strip club, being late for practice, and texting BS with the Nebraska coach. Should have canned him long ago
-Meyer was not putting winning first, he was being too loyal.  Nothing about losing Zack would be a concern about winning going forward. He egotistically thought he could fix Zack.
- it is clear the the OSU camp did not believe the DV claims, and had reasons such as whatever they could get from the police, and personal witnesses accounts. That is also why Meyer didn’t feel like apologizing to CS, why should he apologize to a person that is trying to destroy him, and who had been heard to say that according to three witnesses?
-Meyer was not addressing the question at Big Ten Media days, he was addressing the false report about the 15 incident being an arrest.  He even texted Smith and Emig the night before and had to be refreshed on what they found when they IMMEDIATELY went to the police afterwards to learn more.
-Meyer deleted potential evidence.  Grounds for termination in my book.
-after the 15 incident, which was told to Smith and Meyer from their Title IX officer, they discussed it, reported it to HR and monitored the situation.
-they did not report it to compliance, because it was a law matter not an NCAA matter. IMHO- that is a reasonable conclusion for a coach, but not an AD.
The reporting on this by McMurphy was mostly factual, but very misleading. His desire to hold back information, and his reaction to the aftermath and apology, prove that.he, or nobody can claim with credibility, at least to me, that his intentions were to find the truth. His intentions have always been to find parts of the truth, and report it in a way, and synchronized, to ensure it put Meyer in the worst possible light.
The national media, fed by our outrageous and current PC/ mob mentality took the bate hook, line and sinker. They stumbled over themselves to illustrate outrage over DV that may not have even happened.
This is fueled by our societies’ penchant for bringing down the successful, and by CFB’s vitriolic mentality which means jump on the enemy every chance you get. Fans of every major school, including OSU have biases. The OSU side are greatly outnumbered by the non fans playing lynch mob, and the fans of other schools and conferences.
Nobody believes in due diligence and process anymore.  Someone claims they were a victim, and if it has certain hot button issues such as DV, the media become judge and jury through social media.
All of us hope we would benefit from due process, but when we want to see the other guy burn, the hell with fairness.
ZS is a POS and deserves to be burned at the stake.
Meyer deleted potential evidence, and kept ZS around due to loyalty.
The false narrative that prevails is that Meyer covered up and lied about a person he knew to be a DVer, and, that somehow due to this, someone suffered more than they otherwise would have.
That false narrative is what I most object to.  


Edited to add this.  I wish I was an artful writer, as she says it better in her last paragraph.

https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football-recruiting/2018/08/95635/ohio-state-center-commit-harry-millers-mother-a-domestic-abuse-survivor-voices-support-for-urban-meyer (https://www.elevenwarriors.com/ohio-state-football-recruiting/2018/08/95635/ohio-state-center-commit-harry-millers-mother-a-domestic-abuse-survivor-voices-support-for-urban-meyer)
-
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 25, 2018, 08:02:15 PM
I don’t think I’m understanding correctly. So he should have followed up harder, but people who subsequently followed up were refused the summary of events? Again, ignorance on my part and I’m asking more to learn.
Would a Sports reporter normally know what to ask for?
I think he could have followed up with the police to ensure that was accurate. I may be wrong about what is being withheld. I looked back at his original story and he quotes from the report, though not from the page provided. So I'm guessing the full report is out there, but I haven't been able to find it.
In any event, whether McMurphy should know that is a good question, though he's been around a while and wouldn't be totally ignorant of that kind of stuff. Also possible, the police reports he's used to might be in a different form - every jurisdiction does things differently.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 25, 2018, 08:39:33 PM
HB - there’s parts of your take that I’m really trying to understand but I can’t make click in my head.

The false narrative that Meyer covered up and lied for ZS, but then proceed to call ZS a POS. I simply don’t understand how you can claim he’s a POS but think Meyer didn’t cover for him. Take DV out for a second. I think that’s you’re sticking point. Are you assuming everyone thinks Meyer knew about the DV and was protecting it? If so, I think you’re misunderstanding some of the general outrage here.

Speaking for myself, I think Meyer covered ZS’s scummy activities, besides DV.

Lastly, how is it clear that the OSU Camp doesn’t believe the abuse claims? What factual evidence helped you get there. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m just looking how you connected the dots to that vs they were turning a blind eye ha they didn’t believe it happened.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: OrangeAfroMan on August 25, 2018, 09:06:11 PM
I may have missed it, but has anybody asked why Smith stayed with his wife for so long?  If she was so batspit crazy and all, move on, right?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 25, 2018, 09:43:09 PM
That 300,000 + evidently came in handy I'm guessin' for her & the kids.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 25, 2018, 09:47:15 PM
HB - there’s parts of your take that I’m really trying to understand but I can’t make click in my head.

The false narrative that Meyer covered up and lied for ZS, but then proceed to call ZS a POS. I simply don’t understand how you can claim he’s a POS but think Meyer didn’t cover for him. Take DV out for a second. I think that’s you’re sticking point. Are you assuming everyone thinks Meyer knew about the DV and was protecting it? If so, I think you’re misunderstanding some of the general outrage here.

Speaking for myself, I think Meyer covered ZS’s scummy activities, besides DV.

Lastly, how is it clear that the OSU Camp doesn’t believe the abuse claims? What factual evidence helped you get there. I’m not saying you’re wrong, I’m just looking how you connected the dots to that vs they were turning a blind eye ha they didn’t believe it happened.
Then we agree, it isn’t about the alleged DV.
You can say Meyer covered for ZS.  But is it really “covering” or is just being too blindly loyal to see the danger.  Was there really any risk to Meyer from the loss of ZS?  No.
And if you just compile what Smiths attorney said, specifically about false reports, what Meyer said about he said she said in that very clip you posted, and entertain the possibility that ther is some truth in what the two moms are saying, it is really obvious that the police, and the OSU camp was skeptical at best.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 26, 2018, 09:24:20 AM
Then we agree, it isn’t about the alleged DV.
You can say Meyer covered for ZS.  But is it really “covering” or is just being too blindly loyal to see the danger.  Was there really any risk to Meyer from the loss of ZS?  No.
And if you just compile what Smiths attorney said, specifically about false reports, what Meyer said about he said she said in that very clip you posted, and entertain the possibility that ther is some truth in what the two moms are saying, it is really obvious that the police, and the OSU camp was skeptical at best.  
But back to my point, we’re absent factual evidence. Almost everyone has universally agree that ZS is a POS and Courtney is a little crazy, but we’re going to put the two mothers that raised them on a pedestal and believe they are reliable witnesses? I’m yet to be convinced both families aren’t nuts.
Meyer had a vested interest in taking the approach he didn’t believe it actually happened and so did the program and police department at that point. I don’t think there is any evidence showing the abuse didn’t happen and judging by the character is ZS, it’s very possibly it did. It’s also possible it didn’t and he’s just a dirtbag and she’s batsh*t crazy, but I think it’s unreasonable to see we have clear evidence.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 26, 2018, 10:40:59 AM
It's true. Whether on the cloud (iMessage) or by device forensics, it can be retrieved. But only with a court order, and we should doubt that will ever happen (and even if it does, that Urban will still have that device). An FOIA request wouldn't bring this up either. Not without a court order. Which is really unlikely.
Having the technology to get them (we do) and still not seeing them (we won't) in no way absolves the conspiracy with Voltolini or deletion or tips the balances to say there's probably nothing there.
Couldn't the OSU investigation have gotten a hold of them? I don't know if Meyer's phone is paid for by the school, but I would have thought they'd have tried to get the past texts through court if necessary.
Unless of course they knew they'd find something to justify firing Meyer and didn't want to find info they couldn't explain away. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 26, 2018, 11:03:35 AM

Unless of course they knew they'd find something to justify firing Meyer and didn't want to find info they couldn't explain away.
bingo
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 26, 2018, 11:44:41 AM
There were elements of the BoT that would have liked to see precisely that.Meyer nourished this whole debacle for 6 years - even by just standing by and doing nothing.Some of the most influential members evidently wanted Urbs head on a platter
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 26, 2018, 04:27:10 PM
But back to my point, we’re absent factual evidence. Almost everyone has universally agree that ZS is a POS and Courtney is a little crazy, but we’re going to put the two mothers that raised them on a pedestal and believe they are reliable witnesses? I’m yet to be convinced both families aren’t nuts.
Meyer had a vested interest in taking the approach he didn’t believe it actually happened and so did the program and police department at that point. I don’t think there is any evidence showing the abuse didn’t happen and judging by the character is ZS, it’s very possibly it did. It’s also possible it didn’t and he’s just a dirtbag and she’s batsh*t crazy, but I think it’s unreasonable to see we have clear evidence.
But what specifically was Urbans-vested interest?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 26, 2018, 05:46:45 PM
Couldn't the OSU investigation have gotten a hold of them? I don't know if Meyer's phone is paid for by the school, but I would have thought they'd have tried to get the past texts through court if necessary.
Unless of course they knew they'd find something to justify firing Meyer and didn't want to find info they couldn't explain away.
I think they eliminated that option when they gave the investigation a 2-week timeline. Approval/Forensics could easily take longer, right?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 26, 2018, 05:56:59 PM
I don't think this statement is correct.
I guess I have to agree. The timing of OSU's Monday announcements for "monitoring" and then firing Zach Smith (within an hour) after each McMurphy's two Monday reports could be correlative and not causative. I'm skeptical that it's absolutely the case but I can't deny the possibility.
(Pet peeve is that Urban's 3 weeks suspension ends up being 7 weeks, while Gene's is an actual 3, but that could just be petteyness on my part.)
Many of us agree that Gene's errors were at least as serious as Meyer's perhaps more. So I'm 100% with you. Though I would clarify that Urban's suspension isn't actually 7 weeks. By technical definition it ends (partly) on September 2nd. And I'd say that if we split up a coach's duties, being with the team for the Sun-Fri of weeks 2/3 is far more valuable than being with the team on Saturdays 2/3.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on August 27, 2018, 09:05:14 AM
The onus is on Urby.Gene had brought up firing the Ebola Chimp earlier.The more oversights I see Meyer look past his inaction when something needed to be done.Meyer has flip-flopped and ignoring a prepared statement for the press then arrogantly proclaiming "who makes up stories like that" when there was plenty out there to give the University a black eye.He himself was covering up a series ZS's blunders for 6 seasons.Shit his wifes phone alone was enough to send Zach down the river.I don't think it was a coincidence Zach was fired after the two stories broke.Just like it wasn't a coincidence  Urbz phone got cleaned before an inquiry.Meyer should have been dismissed w/o pay
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on August 27, 2018, 12:50:43 PM
I don’t think I’m understanding correctly. So he should have followed up harder, but people who subsequently followed up were refused the summary of events? Again, ignorance on my part and I’m asking more to learn.
Would a Sports reporter normally know what to ask for?
I know that if I had an arrest report on someone, the next thing I would do is look for an adjudication of the arrest. A bail hearing, a preliminary hearing, something and if I found nothing I would dig deeper to find out why not.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 28, 2018, 12:18:30 AM
I know that if I had an arrest report on someone, the next thing I would do is look for an adjudication of the arrest. A bail hearing, a preliminary hearing, something and if I found nothing I would dig deeper to find out why not.

By the same logic, no member of the public should look at Zach Smith and support him on the basis that, despite the arrests, "he was never charged." 
In which case, I completely agree.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 29, 2018, 07:40:26 PM
Zach Smith and his mom are in full meltdown mode on social media today. He is going full attack on the media and his ex-wife. He is posting pictures of his kids and stating his ex-wife and the media are ruining them. Momma Bruce is attacking Ohio State and Urban.

Every time the story starts to die someone from that family dredges it up. Without some serious intervention this looks like it might be spiraling towards a really bad ending.

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 30, 2018, 08:25:24 AM
Well, this would limit the idea that she’s out for just money right now.

http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180829/report-details-allegations-of-longtime-abuse-by-zach-smith?template=ampart&__twitter_impression=true (http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180829/report-details-allegations-of-longtime-abuse-by-zach-smith?template=ampart&__twitter_impression=true)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 08:49:47 AM
Well, this would limit the idea that she’s out for just money right now.

http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180829/report-details-allegations-of-longtime-abuse-by-zach-smith?template=ampart&__twitter_impression=true (http://www.dispatch.com/news/20180829/report-details-allegations-of-longtime-abuse-by-zach-smith?template=ampart&__twitter_impression=true)
Funny, what we take from what we read.   That’s what you took from that?
I had read that last night and immediately thought, well now they can prove she lied. She had said nobody from OSU had ever. Ontacted her, and her attorney publicly said the same thing.
But, to her credit, she clarified that by this a.m. that no attorney from OSU had contacted her, and that she never would have said that.
The most telling thing was the chief’s saying they have information that either “ explains or dispels” her claims, as opposed to “ promotes or dispels”. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: rolltidefan on August 30, 2018, 09:58:09 AM
Is it common for police reports to change 3 years after incidents? I’m asking out of ignorance. If I obtained a police report, I would never think it was inaccurate, but that’s so out of the realm of my daily life that I’m not sure what’s common and uncommon.
on the police report, i've now seen 3 different copies.
the original, with hand written notes on it (posted here on last page), with the arrest box check, with domestic violence/felonious assault listed as offenses.
one supposedly updated about a week after original, with the arrest box unchecked, invest pending box checked, but also some differences in the offenses listed (disorderly conduct/aggravated menacing)
and a third, updated in 2018, arrest box unchecked, no invest pending box checked, and offenses changed back to dv/fa.
speculating a bit here, but is it not possible that originally they marked for arrest, then changed it to investigate (maybe when she decided not to press charges? or on flip side maybe some flaws in her story appeared?) they also think they might can change charges to get more likely chance of charges/conviction? after investigating a little more, decide they can't (or she just won't charge and/or is big flaws in her story?) and drop it. only to update it finally when it all hits news?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 30, 2018, 10:37:39 AM
She said his morning the officer misunderstood. She never said OSU sent someone to the house, she said someone was sent to the house when she described the 2009 incident to the attorney. That’s a reasonable explanation. 

My point was that she did not bring up the abuse claims right now out of the blue. There’s been growing momentum that she was never abused. From outside the situation, it looks like an abuse victim crying out for help multiple times over the years. It doesn’t mean she’s not crazy, but increasing likelihood that there was unhealthy physical contact many times in their relationship.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 10:51:26 AM
She said his morning the officer misunderstood. She never said OSU sent someone to the house, she said someone was sent to the house when she described the 2009 incident to the attorney. That’s a reasonable explanation.

My point was that she did not bring up the abuse claims right now out of the blue. There’s been growing momentum that she was never abused. From outside the situation, it looks like an abuse victim crying out for help multiple times over the years. It doesn’t mean she’s not crazy, but increasing likelihood that there was unhealthy physical contact many times in their relationship.
Yes I agree.  
My point is- yesterday The Dispatch received an anonymous tip that she had told the police OSU had sent an attorney after the 2015 incident.  
That got published and our rush to judgement society took it as gospel.  
Thankfully she did the right thing and clarified it this morning.  That just makes her more credible in my eyes. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 30, 2018, 10:55:53 AM
Yes I agree.  
My point is- yesterday The Dispatch received an anonymous tip that she had told the police OSU had sent an attorney after the 2015 incident.  
That got published and our rush to judgement society took it as gospel.  
Thankfully she did the right thing and clarified it this morning.  That just makes her more credible in my eyes.
It wasn't an anonymous tip, it was the police incident report, which the chief of police didn't dispute. How is that rushing to judgment?
The police report had the story wrong, which she clarified. It's not that the media reported it wrong. You're attacking the wrong people
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on August 30, 2018, 10:57:29 AM
relying on the police for accurate thorough unbiased credible information is foolish
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on August 30, 2018, 11:04:02 AM
Yes I agree.  
My point is- yesterday The Dispatch received an anonymous tip that she had told the police OSU had sent an attorney after the 2015 incident.  
That got published and our rush to judgement society took it as gospel.  
Thankfully she did the right thing and clarified it this morning.  That just makes her more credible in my eyes.
So this gets into something interesting: media outlets tend to believe what the police say. There’s a far more political discussion to be had about it, but for our small corner of the world, it means public police documents are made very public. That’s long been the media way of operating, as public documents are considered safely reportable. 
This was not a document made publicly available, but it was a police document. The paper contacted be department in question, and the department didn’t dispute it was legitimate. So it was not an “anonymous tip,” but rather an anonomously supplied official document that was verified. 
Now the question is, what should see the light of day. If we err on the side of keeping things quiet, we’ll end up with some not great outcomes. Either folks doing something heinous and a history of behavior that doesn’t quite get to the higher standard of being out there, or people involved using those high standards to hide things (they already can to a degree, and that’s sometimes a problem). If we stick with what we have, lots of innuendo, which we feel is very bad. I don’t know if there’s a better way to do it or not. We’re a curious and reactive species by nature. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 30, 2018, 11:04:18 AM
Yeah that part went from "terminate the football program" bad to "nevermind" pretty fast.  I don't see where Courtney lied about anything and she was pretty fast to clarify in favor of OSU.  I guess if the officer comes out and says she is lying it's one thing, but it seems pretty reasonable to think the officer conflated the stories.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 11:51:59 AM
It wasn't an anonymous tip, it was the police incident report, which the chief of police didn't dispute. How is that rushing to judgment?
The police report had the story wrong, which she clarified. It's not that the media reported it wrong. You're attacking the wrong people
Lol.   I am not attacking anything or anyone.
So now what the police have to say or not say has bearing of this all of the sudden? It didn’t before when they refused to press charges based on the evidence in front of them. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t continue to believe everything that points to your narrative And disavow  out everything that doesn’t. And that’s what this whole thing has been for you and really the whole national media
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 30, 2018, 12:01:22 PM
Slow drip.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 30, 2018, 12:51:49 PM
Lol.   I am not attacking anything or anyone.
So now what the police have to say or not say has bearing of this all of the sudden? It didn’t before when they refused to press charges based on the evidence in front of them. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. You can’t continue to believe everything that points to your narrative And disavow  out everything that doesn’t. And that’s what this whole thing has been for you and really the whole national media
Pot meet kettle. 
Show me where I said what the police say has no bearing? 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 30, 2018, 01:00:15 PM
I thought the bigger conversation this week wasn't this story but all the outlets and "open records request" lawyers acknowledging that deleting those text messages is definitely illegal and begs for police investigation but that won't realistically happen to Meyer in Ohio.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 01:06:30 PM
I thought the bigger conversation this week wasn't this story but all the outlets and "open records request" lawyers acknowledging that deleting those text messages is definitely illegal and begs for police investigation but that won't realistically happen to Meyer in Ohio.
So you know he did delete texts?  How did you get that info since nobody else can confirm that?

Did you validate that through the same process you used to repeatedly refer to ZS as a serial abuser?    

I suspect so.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 01:11:28 PM
Pot meet kettle.
Show me where I said what the police say has no bearing?
You didn’t.  You said that in this aspect it does have bearing.  But to this point you have ignored the fact that the police never had enough reason to make an arrest for DV. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 30, 2018, 01:19:45 PM
I thought the bigger conversation this week wasn't this story but all the outlets and "open records request" lawyers acknowledging that deleting those text messages is definitely illegal and begs for police investigation but that won't realistically happen to Meyer in Ohio.
Haven't seen that.  It could arguably violate Ohio's open records law but not sure it could arise to a criminal matter.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 30, 2018, 01:28:38 PM
You didn’t.  You said that in this aspect it does have bearing.  But to this point you have ignored the fact that the police never had enough reason to make an arrest for DV.
Again, show me where I said that? For someone that claims everyone else is selectively paying attention to things that fit the narrative, you certainly like to put words in someone's mouth to meet your narrative. 
Secondly, the police never stated they didn't have enough reason to make the arrest. They did say they had enough evidence to turn it over to the county prosecutor. 

You honestly think there's no abuse here? Police issue in 2009? Again in 2015. Incident report from 2015 outlines abuse in 2014. Dude is having sex in the office, take d*ck pics in the white house. Ordering sex toys to his place of employment. This is a person you think is above abuse of his wife while there's so many things that point to major character flaws? I'll happily agree there's not concrete evidence saying he did, but there's a lot of smoke around him.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 01:52:08 PM
Again, show me where I said that? For someone that claims everyone else is selectively paying attention to things that fit the narrative, you certainly like to put words in someone's mouth to meet your narrative.
Secondly, the police never stated they didn't have enough reason to make the arrest. They did say they had enough evidence to turn it over to the county prosecutor.

You honestly think there's no abuse here? Police issue in 2009? Again in 2015. Incident report from 2015 outlines abuse in 2014. Dude is having sex in the office, take d*ck pics in the white house. Ordering sex toys to his place of employment. This is a person you think is above abuse of his wife while there's so many things that point to major character flaws? I'll happily agree there's not concrete evidence saying he did, but there's a lot of smoke around him.
The smoke around him being a flaming idiot is overwhelming, factually not debatable and continues to billow, since he continues to act like an idiot.  
There is plenty of evidence-TO ME- that the DV claims are very much in question. 
Virtually everyone who has chimed in that might have inside info ( and there is NO Person that does not have some bias) does not point to clearcut DV.  Rather- a lot of he said- she said, lack of clarity and general realization that this couple was toxic.  
Gene Smiths attorney, the two moms, the notes the compliance officer scribbled, Meyers comments on that clip you posted- it all points to the fact that OSU did not feel strongly enough about the DV allegations to take further action in 15 or anytime after.   
The narrative that started , and lives, is just the opposite. And the facts do not support that narrative as much as they disprove it. 
The facts do support that OSU and Meyer gave ZS way too much lenioand too many second chances around his overall behavior, and he had a conversation with his head of operations about eliminating texts on his phone that were over a year old.  
Worthy of termination or suspension?  Eye of the beholder.   But DV was not tolerated or covered up and in fact not even certain to have happened.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 30, 2018, 02:23:49 PM
Haven't seen that.  It could arguably violate Ohio's open records law but not sure it could arise to a criminal matter.
I'm on the wrong devise to copy/paste. Just google "Meyer phone delete illegal." They all came out in a 24-hour period 3-4 days ago. USAtoday had one. Ohio outlets had the others.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 30, 2018, 02:25:20 PM
Sounds like one of the OSU Trustees is retiring specifically because he thought that the proceedings against Meyer were a sham:

NY times (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/30/sports/ohio-state-trustee-resigns-urban-meyer.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytsports): https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/30/sports/ohio-state-trustee-resigns-urban-meyer.html?smtyp=cur&smid=tw-nytsports

“I didn’t feel that I’d seen high-integrity behavior,” Mr. Wadsworth said of Mr. Meyer.
"You read the report,” Mr. Wadsworth said, “and there’s seven or eight things about emails, memory loss, hearing things five times, and to me, that raised an issue of standards, values — not how many games someone should be suspended for.”
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 04:24:52 PM
he sounds confused. Often the case on larger Boards- there is always a few. I see it in real life.
Good attempt on your part to further your spin.

Here is some anti spin by a person actually involved in the investigation:

“The biggest problem in this OSU matter is the rush to judgment and the erroneous reporting of details by some irresponsible media and the amateur reporting of false information on social media," he wrote. "So, as a lawyer deeply involved in the investigation on behalf of Gene Smith, I am compelled to simply state the facts. The investigation was commenced to determine two issues: Did OSU cover-up domestic violence, and did Urban (Meyer) lie to the media in furtherance of a cover-up.
“After an exhaustive investigation that involved 40 witness interviews and thousands of documents, the investigators who were searching for information to enable them to answer, ‘Yes,’ answered them both ‘NO.’ But to justify a $500K investigation you have to find something. The fact established that Gene Smith learned of the 2015 allegations (regarding Zach Smith) and immediately pulled Urban off the practice field to inform him, and ordered the assistant (Smith) back to Columbus, not to Ohio State, but to go directly to the Powell police to answer their questions. He then discussed the matter with the Title IX Compliance Official and Public Safety Liaison and Human Resources, and he ordered OSU police OSU officials to monitor the Powell investigation. No OSU official can interfere in a criminal investigation or take steps to make it appear they are influencing an investigation. Powell (police) concluded there was no evidence to support the allegations (made by Zach Smith’s ex-wife, Courtney), and we now know this person (Courtney) made false reports on other occasions.
“But the investigation had to find something, so they said Gene and Urban should have reported it to Compliance. Really? Compliance handles NCAA matters, not domestic violence. And try as the might, investigators could not find any evidence that Urban lied to anyone. They concede that Urban was confused by the question he thought he was being asked (at Big Ten media days) and thought he was being asked the same thing as the day before when someone suggested that Zach Smith had been ‘arrested’ for domestic violence, which to this day has never occurred. Despite digging deep, the investigators concluded Urban misspoke and did not lie to anyone.


So, why the sanction? Well, isn’t it obvious? The country was lathered into a frenzy based on erroneous information and a long delay, and OSU needed to appease the lynch mob that had formed as soon as the unproven allegations were made. As a result, two great men fell on the sword."




Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 30, 2018, 04:34:28 PM
Good call. The lawyer for Gene Smith would never spin this one way over another.

For the record, I don't think anyone on this board has stated OSU covered up for abuse. More accurately, some believe that there was domestic abuse happening in the Smith home. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 30, 2018, 04:38:56 PM
Spin?
It's widely agreed (nationwide as well as within your fan base) that Urban did sketchy things here. The question has always been which punishment is fitting. I'm ok with the suspension, but I think the argument should have been "suspension or fired?" not "suspension or walk?"

And yeah the forgetfulness looks bad but I'll agree that's just empty drama that can't be proven either way. Still: The top two alone are enough to be disappointed if the board primarily wished to reinstate with a punishment of time served.
Meanwhile, didn't you also agree the next day that time served would have been a mistake?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 04:39:54 PM
Good call. The lawyer for Gene Smith would never spin this one way over another.

For the record, I don't think anyone on this board has stated OSU covered up for abuse. More accurately, some believe that there was domestic abuse happening in the Smith home.
Courtney would never spin it would she?   Paul Finebaum wouldn't spin it would he?   you see where I am going here.....
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 30, 2018, 05:21:29 PM
Courtney would never spin it would she?   Paul Finebaum wouldn't spin it would he?   you see where I am going here.....
On multiple occasions in this conversation I've had an open mind to other possibilities. If it's in negative light towards OSU or any of their staff, the same cannot be said about your opinion.
Sure Courtney could spin and the same could be said for so many people.. BUT, you're basically saying, your opinions and statements are BS and not based on fact and here's how I know.. someone with complete knowledge is backing my opinion.... except that person has a singular vested interest in defending the party your opinion aligns with.  It's been hypocritical at best.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Hawkinole on August 30, 2018, 05:36:23 PM
I can't keep up with all the nuanced arguments that have been made.

These domestic cases are difficult to ferret out.  Even cases with injuries sometimes involve issues of who was the primary physical aggressor, was there the use of reasonable force in self-defense. How does a coach who is not a witness to the acts, and not an investigator for law enforcement, sort that out when law enforcement concluded there was no probable cause to believe a crime was committed?

Then the sex toys are ordered to the office. There are allegations of infidelity. The assistant coach does indeed have issues. He was let go, as he should have been. Then as later information surfaces, photos of genitalia in the White House of all places, the assistant loses much credibility. But going back historically, I would guess both marital partners were doing a  good job trying to keep this out of the media to protect a high paying job. I didn't read the reports.  I wasn't clear what happened between the assistant and his wife through that extremely weird, and not very revealing, press conference. 

I am not saying much, except I am in the dark about the whole thing, and these types of cases tend to have ample ambiguity. I have been in enough of these cases as an attorney to know that women abuse men, too, and can start fights, as well. And these can be very hard cases for prosecutors to win.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 05:38:37 PM
On multiple occasions in this conversation I've had an open mind to other possibilities. If it's in negative light towards OSU or any of their staff, the same cannot be said about your opinion.
Sure Courtney could spin and the same could be said for so many people.. BUT, you're basically saying, your opinions and statements are BS and not based on fact and here's how I know.. someone with complete knowledge is backing my opinion.... except that person has a singular vested interest in defending the party your opinion aligns with.  It's been hypocritical at best.
That’s simply not true.  I have repeatedly that Meyer scored up, and could have been fired.  
All I am adding to that is the DV allegations have little to do with it- because it is extremely difficult for us/ and it was extremely difficult for OSU to really know for sure what was real there. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: 847badgerfan on August 30, 2018, 05:49:50 PM
I can't keep up with all the nuanced arguments that have been made.
Yeah, me too.
This is a slow drip.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 30, 2018, 05:55:44 PM
Yeah, me too.
This is a slow drip.
We'll talk about football after tonight. Thank god for football. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on August 30, 2018, 06:39:32 PM
These domestic cases are difficult to ferret out.  Even cases with injuries sometimes involve issues of who was the primary physical aggressor, was there the use of reasonable force in self-defense. How does a coach who is not a witness to the acts, and not an investigator for law enforcement, sort that out when law enforcement concluded there was no probable cause to believe a crime was committed?
The coach doesn't. That's why he's supposed to report it to Compliance, HR, hell, anyone other than himself and the AD, who don't have the training or experience to handle this. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 30, 2018, 07:06:52 PM
he sounds confused. Often the case on larger Boards- there is always a few. I see it in real life.


The Trustee’s must be on those Urban Meyer medications then. 

Looking at Mr Wadsworth’s bio tells me he seems to be a pretty sharp guy, who spent 11 hours in a room with people trying to spin their way into preservation of their football coach.
What really jumps out at me is the OSU fans citing Courtney Smith that have repeatedly denigrated her reliability and character over a month now that she said something that refuted a police report. As Jay Bilas said there is “some serious rhythmic gymnastics” happening in Columbus to try make this all seem ok, in the name of preserving the football season.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on August 30, 2018, 07:23:14 PM
Jay Bilas is still in recovery after he defended Rick Pitino contrary to all norms of common sense
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 07:41:44 PM
The coach doesn't. That's why he's supposed to report it to Compliance, HR, hell, anyone other than himself and the AD, who don't have the training or experience to handle this.
Well, the Title 9 office received the news from campus police- so they told Smith who told Meyer.  Even the title 9 person did not share w compliance pending outcome of charges or no charges.  As a group they decided to also inform HR- which they did.  
If you want to say they should have told compliance- that’s more on Smith than Meyer
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on August 30, 2018, 07:43:42 PM
The Trustee’s must be on those Urban Meyer medications then.

Looking at Mr Wadsworth’s bio tells me he seems to be a pretty sharp guy, who spent 11 hours in a room with people trying to spin their way into preservation of their football coach.
What really jumps out at me is the OSU fans citing Courtney Smith that have repeatedly denigrated her reliability and character over a month now that she said something that refuted a police report. As Jay Bilas said there is “some serious rhythmic gymnastics” happening in Columbus to try make this all seem ok, in the name of preserving the football season.
So- the one guy who agrees with your narrative had it right- but the other 19 very accomplished people got it wrong?
Do you hear yourself saying that and how utterly ridiculous that sounds?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 30, 2018, 08:44:25 PM
You might have missed my response, HB (4:38pm).
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: NorthernOhioBuckeye on August 31, 2018, 08:20:50 AM
The more I hear and read about this, the more it supports my earlier contention that Meyer is not suspended for his lack of reporting the 2015 incident to anyone, but for his poor judgement in not firing Zach Smith for his multiple transgressions. And to top that off, Gene Smiths lawyer did hit the nail on the head when he stated that part of this was due to appease the media and everyone calling for a scalp based on incomplete facts.

As for the issue of DV with ZS, I believe that he is most likely guilty of DV in his marriage, but I also believe that Courtney could be guilty also. But as far as OSU was concerned, I honestly feel that they did what they could to investigate this, but didn't come up with anything actionable on their part. 

After all of this, I feel that the suspension handed down by OSU of Meyer is appropriate for allowing ZS to be employed as a coach after all of the things we have found out about his behavior. It is also apparent to me that he was not fired for failing to act on charges of DV that neither he, Gene Smith or the school investigators knew enough to do anything about. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on August 31, 2018, 12:47:32 PM
Urban, what are you doing? There isn't a statement you could release that is in your best interest. Just take the punishment silently and pray the story fizzles out in the next month or two.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: HailHailMSP on August 31, 2018, 12:49:28 PM
The more I hear and read about this, the more it supports my earlier contention that Meyer is not suspended for his lack of reporting the 2015 incident to anyone, but for his poor judgement in not firing Zach Smith for his multiple transgressions. And to top that off, Gene Smiths lawyer did hit the nail on the head when he stated that part of this was due to appease the media and everyone calling for a scalp based on incomplete facts.

As for the issue of DV with ZS, I believe that he is most likely guilty of DV in his marriage, but I also believe that Courtney could be guilty also. But as far as OSU was concerned, I honestly feel that they did what they could to investigate this, but didn't come up with anything actionable on their part.

After all of this, I feel that the suspension handed down by OSU of Meyer is appropriate for allowing ZS to be employed as a coach after all of the things we have found out about his behavior. It is also apparent to me that he was not fired for failing to act on charges of DV that neither he, Gene Smith or the school investigators knew enough to do anything about.
That's a pretty fair assessment and really close to where I sit. I might feel a lengthier suspension was in order, especially when factoring the ability to come back for practice weeks more quickly, but it is what it is at this point. I am pretty happy that B1G season kicked off. I also wouldn't mind never hearing from Zach Smith, Lynn Bruce, or any ZS apologists like former player Matt Finkes. The more they say, the more the media focuses in. 

And, as I write this I see Urban has released another statement. Unproductive at this point. Let's move on. I am ready for football.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on August 31, 2018, 01:49:08 PM
The more I hear and read about this, the more it supports my earlier contention that Meyer is not suspended for his lack of reporting the 2015 incident to anyone, but for his poor judgement in not firing Zach Smith for his multiple transgressions. And to top that off, Gene Smiths lawyer did hit the nail on the head when he stated that part of this was due to appease the media and everyone calling for a scalp based on incomplete facts.

As for the issue of DV with ZS, I believe that he is most likely guilty of DV in his marriage, but I also believe that Courtney could be guilty also. But as far as OSU was concerned, I honestly feel that they did what they could to investigate this, but didn't come up with anything actionable on their part.

After all of this, I feel that the suspension handed down by OSU of Meyer is appropriate for allowing ZS to be employed as a coach after all of the things we have found out about his behavior. It is also apparent to me that he was not fired for failing to act on charges of DV that neither he, Gene Smith or the school investigators knew enough to do anything about.
That's a very good take. The one and only additional factor for me would be his handling of the media day, specifically the "who makes up a story like that" comment. You nailed everything else. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 01, 2018, 11:20:26 AM
Didn't want to spoil the SOC with this. The risk of course is that it's taken too seriously over here:

https://mobile.twitter.com/DVNJr/status/1035888771101851648
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 01, 2018, 04:15:59 PM
Not at all I hope it's on coast to coast and the smug chump hears people laughing about it
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 01, 2018, 06:15:59 PM
smug chump nails it
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 01, 2018, 06:39:12 PM
By the smug chump I meant Meyer,how many Bud Fats have you drained
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 01, 2018, 07:13:24 PM
I've drained a whole bunch, started at 10:30am central, as usual Saturday

but, I was also referring to Urban

great minds?

I meant that you nailed the label, "smug chump"
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 02, 2018, 09:43:14 AM
good to nail something occasionally I guess.I'm having a Yuengling later consequences be damned
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 02, 2018, 06:43:07 PM
how'd it go?

I didn't have too many drinks after 7pm - never did have a kickoff - disappointing 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 05:41:17 PM
Sorry for the bump, but it made me laugh and was timely:

https://twitter.com/KVanValkenburg/status/1041695567255154689
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on September 18, 2018, 06:10:03 PM
That's honestly funny. My buddies, whom are Buckeye fans, are cringing every time he does this and all agree he needs to simply stop talking. His PR people are not good.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 18, 2018, 06:45:28 PM
Really Urbz just STFU,don't piss down our backs and tell us its raining.So reading between the lines he was not only ignorant of his responsibilities but foolishly called others out thinking they were as woefully inept in theirs - idgit.Shame he had to sully and stain the University,yup I'm sure of it - I hate him.That is the exact reason why - what a carnival barker,and as the song says I'm frightened by those that don't see it  

>:(
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 07:21:50 PM
Really just STFU,don't piss down our backs and tell us its raining.So reading between the lines he was not only ignorant of his responsibilities but foolishly called others out thinking they were as woefully inept in theirs - idgit.Shame he had to sully and stain the University,yup I'm sure of it - I hate him.That is the exact reason why - what a carnival barker,and as the song says I'm frightened by those that don't see it  

 >:(
Then you frightened by me.  I don’t see it. 
As I have said from the beginning, and it is more obvious now, nobody believed CS, including the cops.
As Urban said, what was firing ZS going to do to protect her and the kids? Nothing.
This is really more of a social outrage issue, and a guy who thought he could fix something and gave a guy too many chances.
And now that he looked straight into the camera and said repeatedly, that he never deleted a single message, and there was never any evidence that he di, I believe him.
I actually think he is not good in front of cameras, but I am thankful he is substantially better in front of the cameras than some other high profile coaches in the league, even on his bad days.
Hate on......
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 07:34:59 PM
Sorry for the bump, but it made me laugh and was timely:

https://twitter.com/KVanValkenburg/status/1041695567255154689
You sure enjoy stirring the pot don’t you.
With your coaches escapades, I would think you would be more restrained.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:08:13 PM
Ah, no worries. Urban doesn't need me. He can do all of the stirring for himself - and keeps proving it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 08:11:49 PM
Clever.   Nice try.   We should start a thread “ the sins of our coaches “

Want to play?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:16:04 PM
And now that he looked straight into the camera and said repeatedly, that he never deleted a single message, and there was never any evidence that he di, I believe him.

Good thing he only said what can't be proven. 
Had he, on the other hand, contradicted the findings of the independent report and said he didn't conspire to delete evidence with his Director of Football Operation, only in that case should we question his trustworthiness. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 08:19:07 PM
Good thing he only said what can't be proven.
Had he, on the other hand, contradicted the findings of the independent report and said he didn't conspire to delete evidence with his Director of Football Operation, only in that case should we question his trustworthiness.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:22:07 PM
Clever.   Nice try.   We should start a thread “ the sins of our coaches “

Want to play?
If you want, by all means, go to the other threads where it's relevant and say what you like about other people. But using this thread to bad mouth people who aren't Urban (or part of the investigation) is just deflecting. 
"Why focus on this when you can look over there? Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout..."

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on September 18, 2018, 08:33:25 PM
Big Ten press conference was today. I was encouraged that for the 10 minutes Urban had to speak it was all about football and zero about Zach Smith firing.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:33:54 PM
Now that the dust has settled, I am of the position that he didn’t do anything to warrant a suspension.  It was politically motivated. What did he actually do wrong?
Haters gonna hate.  
That's fully ok. It's an opinion. Just like it's also OK for others to disagree. 
For the record, another time just in case it's been missed, I've been 100% fine with the suspension, but I do think that the decision here was between suspension and termination, rather than between suspension and nothing.
After all: He didn't report up. His boss reported down, and they knowingly kept it between themselves "for months," strategically choosing to leave out Compliance, per the investigation, and not passing it on to Compliance was a dereliction of responsibility and a line-item violation of Urban's contract. 
The conspiracy to delete evidence on top of that was also worthy of a "suspension or termination?" conversation.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 08:34:39 PM
If you want, by all means, go to the other threads where it's relevant and say what you like about other people. But using this thread to bad mouth people who aren't Urban (or part of the investigation) is just deflecting.
"Why focus on this when you can look over there? Whatabout, whatabout, whatabout..."


Who is deflecting, me or you? Who is bumping a thread that was basically dead? Who seems to want to diminish Meyer, and keep people talking about it, you or me? 
Is it because the coach you worship has not done what you thought he would? Do you feel like he doesn’t have the “ it “ factor you so crave? 
You have made your feelings known way way back.  Why the need to shine light on it?  What are you afraid of people looking at somewhere else?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:38:13 PM
Big Ten press conference was today. I was encouraged that for the 10 minutes Urban had to speak it was all about football and zero about Zach Smith firing.
What happened after the first 10 minutes? Also, thinking back before this week, what would you have thought about the expectation that Urban would get a tougher media crowd for this topic when on the road than when in Columbus?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 08:39:15 PM
That's fully ok. It's an opinion. Just like it's also OK for others to disagree.
For the record, another time just in case it's been missed, I've been 100% fine with the suspension, but I do think that the decision here was between suspension and termination, rather than between suspension and nothing.
After all: He didn't report up. His boss reported down, and they knowingly kept it between themselves "for months," strategically choosing to leave out Compliance, per the investigation, and not passing it on to Compliance was a dereliction of responsibility and a line-item violation of Urban's contract.
The conspiracy to delete evidence on top of that was also worthy of a "suspension or termination?" conversation.
That you imterpret it that way, after now hearing both sides, is shocking to me.
How is it Meyers fault that the cops called someone else, and the Title 9 officer at OSU went to Smith, who then went to Meyer.  And they did NOT keep it to themselves, they told HR. The THREE of them decided that it wasn’t compliance related since it was legal, not NCAA.   And e en the title 9 officer, a female, advised them to follow the investigation to conclusion before taking any additional action.
Reading comprehension dude...it’s badass.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:43:42 PM
Who is deflecting, me or you? Who is bumping a thread that was basically dead? Who seems to want to diminish Meyer, and keep people talking about it, you or me?
Is it because the coach you worship has not done what you thought he would? Do you feel like he doesn’t have the “ it “ factor you so crave?
You have made your feelings known way way back.  Why the need to shine light on it?  What are you afraid of people looking at somewhere else?
(1) you were deflecting. Telling us that other coaches are also bad or worse is the very definition of deflecting from the topic being had. Anything in this topic that is about Urban, his future, his past, or the investigation is on topic. Anything outside those things may be off topic. Coaches at other schools who are not involved here are off topic. Bringing them up is a deflection tactic.
(2) Why did I post this? Because it was timely. Urban just came back from suspension. He also published another fresh apology/explanation -- another one of these silly, long-winded, social media things that are not in the best interest of his own PR.
So ... it was on topic. On time. And funnily worded
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 08:48:23 PM
(1) you were deflecting. Telling us that other coaches are also bad or worse is the very definition of deflecting from the topic being had. Anything in this topic that is about Urban, his future, his past, or the investigation is on topic. Anything outside those things may be off topic. Coaches at other schools who are not involved here are off topic. Bringing them up is a deflection tactic.
(2) Why did I post this? Because it was timely. Urban just came back from suspension. He also published another fresh apology/explanation -- another one of these silly, long-winded, social media things that are not in the best interest of his own PR.
So ... it was on topic. On time. And funnily worded
You fancy yourself don’t you.  
I’ll tell you what Dudekd. I have too much respect for you to continue this because I feel you have a bias that is fogging you, and I am sure you feel the same as I do.
Let’s just agree that we disagree.   
I will only add that I am not one of the PC mob in today’s culture, who automatically assumes an accuser is telling the truth.   It seems to be prevalent these days, and lives get ruined.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:49:00 PM
Reading comprehension? The final report said Urban was responsible and contractually specified to report all of this to Compliance ... and didn't.
I'm happy to go copy/past the relevant sections. Brb.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on September 18, 2018, 08:53:50 PM
Who is deflecting, me or you? Who is bumping a thread that was basically dead? Who seems to want to diminish Meyer, and keep people talking about it, you or me?
Is it because the coach you worship has not done what you thought he would? Do you feel like he doesn’t have the “ it “ factor you so crave?
You have made your feelings known way way back.  Why the need to shine light on it?  What are you afraid of people looking at somewhere else?
The “you just hate us becuase we’re good,” line of defense? Mmmm, always a favorite. 
(FWIW, this got bumped becuase Urby went out and delivered an enlightening, deeply cringe-worthy press conference. This would be the place to talk about it becuase it’s news about the topic. It’s the first time he’s answered questions about it since the report came out)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 08:54:01 PM
Reading comprehension? The final report said Urban was responsible and contractually specified to report all of this to Compliance ... and didn't.
I'm happy to go copy/past the relevant sections. Brb.
Funny how Smith has that same responsibility, but for some strange reason ther is no outrage or even a peep about that.  And he has greater accountability- he AGREED with Meyer that compliance was out of scope.
And that nobody talks about Gene Smith on this is all the proof needed to illustrate that the outrage against Meyer is because he wins.  You, nor anyone else will admit that though.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:54:32 PM
From pages 17 and 18 of the official document: (https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=2ahUKEwjx5qXf68XdAhVJ64MKHeANBpAQFjAAegQIABAC&url=https%3A%2F%2Fnews.osu.edu%2Fdownload%2F579626%2Fosusummaryoffindings-finaldesktop.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2eky1FbdvhfykbFjGTGded)

B. Reporting obligations regarding the events of 2015-2016:
1. Under his employment contract with OSU, Urban Meyer had at all relevant times an obligation to “immediately report to the [Athletic] Director and to the Department’s Office of Compliance Services in writing if any person or entity, including without limitation, representatives of Ohio State's athletic interests, has violated or is likely to violate or may potentiallyhave violated any [applicable] laws,” including all federal, state and local laws. (Meyer Employment Contract §4.1.d)

(...)

3. Because they believed Zach Smith’s denials and because there was no charge or arrest in connection with the 2015-2016 events, neither Coach Meyer nor AD Smith believed that there had been a violation or a potential violation of the law and therefore neither had reporting obligations regarding what they knew about the law enforcement investigation of Zach Smith. In addition, Coach Meyer, because he was first informed of the 2015-2016 investigation by AD Smith, believed that he had no further reporting obligations. In assessing their reporting obligations, both Coach Meyer and AD Smith placed heavy reliance on the absence of formal law enforcement or court action. Neither made any report of the matter to Athletic Compliance or University Compliance for consideration of whether an internal investigation should be conducted. Under the broad language of their contracts, reporting obligations can be triggered in the absence of formal, external action. Reporting requirements are intended to be both broad and redundant – in the case of Coach Meyer, they require reporting (in writing) to two places (to the AD and to Athletic Compliance) and the obligation to report is placed on each individual, an obligation not relieved by the knowledge or reporting by another individual. While we find that both Coach Meyer and AD Smith believed in good faith that they did not have sufficient information to trigger any reporting obligation, we believe that they viewed the issue too narrowly through the lens of law enforcement action. Both should have made some report of Zach Smith’s potential violation of the domestic violence laws, which was the subject of the law enforcement investigation they came to know about in late October 2015. Such reports would have been made to the Athletic Compliance Office and, for AD Smith, the Office of University Compliance and Integrity.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 08:55:39 PM
Funny how Smith has that same responsibility, but for some strange reason ther is no outrage or even a peep about that.  And he has greater accountability- he AGREED with Meyer that compliance was out of scope.
And that nobody talks about Gene Smith on this is all the proof needed to illustrate that the outrage against Meyer is because he wins.  You, nor anyone else will admit that though.
Oh, I think we are all surprised Smith still has a job. On both sides. He arguably made even more mistakes. So what is there to discuss?
Don't mistake a lack of conversation for a lack of blame. It just isn't of interest to anyone anymore.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 08:55:49 PM
The “you just hate us becuase we’re good,” line of defense? Mmmm, always a favorite.
(FWIW, this got bumped becuase Urby went out and delivered an enlightening, deeply cringe-worthy press conference. This would be the place to talk about it becuase it’s news about the topic. It’s the first time he’s answered questions about it since the report came out)
Ahh, another closet wolverine fan speaks.  Thank you.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on September 18, 2018, 08:59:21 PM
You fancy yourself don’t you.  
I’ll tell you what Dudekd. I have too much respect for you to continue this because I feel you have a bias that is fogging you, and I am sure you feel the same as I do.
Let’s just agree that we disagree.  
I will only add that I am not one of the PC mob in today’s culture, who automatically assumes an accuser is telling the truth.   It seems to be prevalent these days, and lives get ruined.
It’s intersting, in some senses, PC is a way to skirt what some consider the realities of things. Like to be un-PC is to speak out some uncomfortable truth. But here, the un-PC thing is to deny a potentially uncomfortable truth. 
Unless what PC and not PC are really about is standing for or against historically ... we’ll say less powerful groups. And if that’s the case, then it is what it is I guess.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 09:02:22 PM
I am not one of the PC mob in today’s culture
I'm definitely not pro-PC.
Did you catch my response on Page 7 of this thread to someone else saying PCness is a worthy goal?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on September 18, 2018, 09:03:31 PM
Ahh, another closet wolverine fan speaks.  Thank you.
AHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA. 
HB, if the answer is that anyone poking at the coach who said his only fault is he cares too much must like Michigan, well it’s just dang hard to take seriously. 
(F’real, Muck Fichigan forever and ever)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 09:09:05 PM
It’s intersting, in some senses, PC is a way to skirt what some consider the realities of things. Like to be un-PC is to speak out some uncomfortable truth. But here, the un-PC thing is to deny a potentially uncomfortable truth.
Unless what PC and not PC are really about is standing for or against historically ... we’ll say less powerful groups. And if that’s the case, then it is what it is I guess.
Let me give you an example( or just go read CNN with today’s headlines)
A person goes public with claims of DV.  Virtually every media outlet and talking head rushes to judgement based on that claim, falling over themselves in the twiitersphere to show greater levels of outrage, and take down some bad guy.  Nevermind due process, gathering the other side of the story, or even denying ( that’s now called 
victim shaming) 

That’s where we are today.  You can call it whatever you want, but if it ever happened to you or someone you care about, people just pile on.

Did it ever occur to you( as the evidence screams) that NOBODY who was involved, could find credibility in her claims? Nobody.  Not the cops who were called 55 times, the families, the other staff members and coaches?

But it’s completly against the rules to reach out to her, or your tampering. And it is completely against the rules to say she is lying, because that is victim shaming.

You see, once accused, a high profile person is sunk.  There are no good options. Damned if you apologize, damned if you don’t.  ( you posts here and Bayareawolverine’s illustrate that). 

That is what we are talking about.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 09:09:29 PM
AHAHHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA.
HB, if the answer is that anyone poking at the coach who said his only fault is he cares too much must like Michigan, well it’s just dang hard to take seriously.
(F’real, Muck Fichigan forever and ever)
You always do.    Always.  And for the record, that’s cool.  Good school, great program.  I just never understood your veiled attempts to hide it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 09:23:15 PM
You see, once accused, a high profile person is sunk.  There are no good options. Damned if you apologize, damned if you don’t.
This is a problem.
Hence, it's best to just report to Compliance.
And, if you make the mistake and don't, it's best for one's PR to at least not mess up the first apology.
And if you do mess up the first apology, don't keep publishing underwhelming apology/explanations to your social media account.
And if you do keep publishing recurrent apology/explanations, at least don't do it 3 or 4 extra times.
Just quit trying to look good. Trust that in a few months or year it'll almost entirely go away.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 09:27:04 PM
This is a problem.
Hence, it's best to just report to Compliance.
And, if you make the mistake and don't, it's best for one's PR to at least not mess up the first apology.
And if you do mess up the first apology, don't keep publishing underwhelming apology/explanations to your social media account.
And if you do keep publishing recurrent apology/explanations, at least don't do it 3 or 4 extra times.
Just quit trying to look good. Trust that in a few months or year it'll almost entirely go away.
Said another way, don’t try to tell the truth or tell your side of the story, because people like Dudekd, who is in the majority, have already decided and take the self righteous position of judge and jury.
The post you just posted is sickening to me.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 09:30:25 PM
Did you read the old post I dredged up about political correctness? Because you seem to be accusing my belief system of being the opposite of what it is.
Also: my last post was 100% about recognizing the current environment and being smart in it. It had nothing to do with justice, "the right way for the world to be" or personal beliefs. Just about minimizing damage when a guy finds his reputation under threat.
And once Urban came under the microscope, he made a lot of bad PR mistakes. All of them were predictable in advance and avoidable.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 09:33:33 PM
I will add, I guarantee you that you don’t believe for a second that reporting it to compliance would have changed a single thing. Your too smart to think otherwise.

Asking your staff to get and follow the police investigation, conferring with your boss and your Title 9 officer and Human Resources, and asking your troubled employee every day if things are ok at home....but the hey, compliance( who has no authority in this matter) would magically save the day.

And if he had,  not one person out there- including you, would have a different opinion.  Truth.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 09:35:06 PM
I hate what this environment has become.     
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 09:35:41 PM
If you want, we can talk about the way we wish the world could be ... and wonder what it would be like if Urban lived there instead. 
But I figured it was more worthy of our time to talk about the way the world actually is ... and how a person with a suffering reputation can smartly live in it.
In any event, the latter is not the same as supporting a HOW DARE YOU culture.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 09:40:59 PM
If you want, we can talk about the way we wish the world could be ... and wonder what it would be like if Urban lived there instead.
But I figured it was more worthy of our time to talk about the way the world actually is ... and how a person with a suffering reputation can smartly live in it.
In any event, the latter is not the same as supporting a HOW DARE YOU culture.
The environment we are in has nothing to do with Meyer.  Don’t be an asshat.
And a person with a potentially unjustifiable suffering reputation can’t do much.  Nuances of what they say or do might make minescules of difference, at best.
You are representative- at least to me, of the HOW DARE YOU culture. This thread has made me realize that.
For god sakes it is a football forum.   
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 09:42:23 PM
I will add, I guarantee you that you don’t believe for a second that reporting it to compliance would have changed a single thing. Your too smart to think otherwise.

Asking your staff to get and follow the police investigation, conferring with your boss and your Title 9 officer and Human Resources, and asking your troubled employee every day if things are ok at home....but the hey, compliance( who has no authority in this matter) would magically save the day.

And if he had,  not one person out there- including you, would have a different opinion.  Truth.  
I don't know if reporting it to Compliance would have changed anything. I only know that reporting to compliance was the responsibility of Urban and Gene. That it was in their contracts. That they didn't despite the responsibility and contracts. And that the investigation agreed.
Honestly, it probably would not have made any difference for Zach or Courtney.
However, at the very least it would have been a sign that everyone around them was caring and trying at least a little harder. And since it would inevitably have led to more sit downs between administrators and Zach, who knows, maybe it would have led to extra therapy or something would have clicked. But, no, I would not have bet on it mattering.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on September 18, 2018, 09:46:05 PM

You see, once accused, a high profile person is sunk.  There are no good options. Damned if you apologize, damned if you don’t.  ( you posts here and Bayareawolverine’s illustrate that).

That is what we are talking about.  
He's mad that everyone believes the victim. 
Now he claims the victimhood for himself. "These badger fans are actually MICHIGAN FANS" because they dare to say Urban is scummy. Lord, I at least expected the respect of being called a biased homer for my own team. But called a Michigan fan, it just speaks to lashing out. It speaks to a pitch of near tantrum. So defensive. 
(It's interesting that Urban is stuck between a rock and a hard place. If he comes out and says what he feels, Courtney Smith is a liar, it'll be hard to talk about respecting women, since you put one who was sort of family for a long time on blast. But he can't bring himself to express empathy because he doesn't believe her. So he ends up in this dance of not being on the same page as the PR releases that go out in his defense. I suppose he was right to walk back the medication/memory thing. It was a goofy one, though the doubling against that report just adds to the muddle)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 09:46:44 PM
You are representative- at least to me, of the HOW DARE YOU culture. This thread has made me realize that.   
Sigh. Please do me the courtesy (or special favor) of reading this and get back to me if your opinion is unchanged
Though it’s objectively good to be nice to people – or at the very least to not be actively offensive – political correctness will never be a practical way to fix this about the world because its spirit of scolding is egotistical and off-putting, making it right for the wrong reason, which naturally causes the objects of its scolding to double down. 
We deserve a more humble formula than “HOW DARE YOU, and now that I’ve stolen your attention, guess who also knows the best way for you to live?” Because even if the person saying HOW DARE YOU is correct about something that really matters, their style comprehensively fails. (...) Turns out that "It's not what you say but how you say it" wasn't just a lesson for toddlers.
Unfortunately, the schism between these two sides has become one of the most entrenched aspects of modern western identity and has fueled a sizable chunk of our current volatilty. And tragically, these fights that seem so meaty and essential are usually empty. I.E.: there are good people on the non-PC side who aren't being offensive for offensiveness's sake but rather to spite the PCers for thinking they had the right to be so sanctimonious about anything in the first place. 
As for me, I'll admit I lean progressive on most matters, but I see PCness as a sickness and believe that finding a more patient and non-judgy way to express that "being a dick is fine if you're into that but actually, man, just try not to" is one of the most important upcoming social revolutions.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on September 18, 2018, 09:59:19 PM

That’s where we are today.  You can call it whatever you want, but if it ever happened to you or someone you care about, people just pile on.
This is a tough nut to crack, and I mean that from a human element. 
On one hand, if someone was accused of something that I believed to be not true, I'd feel a great deal of sympathy. On the other, if someone I knew was assaulted and utterly not believed, I'd have a great deal of sympathy as well. It's a somewhat unanswerable question. 
I suppose I'd try to have sympathy for all. It gets a little muddier when we're talking about damage control, muddled messages and press conferences. I heard on a podcast about the idea of complimenting someone for handling it well, like we're fans of non-answers. Urban gave some real answers, some odd non-answers. He ended up looking not great. Maybe that's because of the PC mob. Maybe it's because he didn't put much to bed. Maybe it's because he showed himself to be the cynic's image of him, snarling and indignant, handed a life vest but a little to proud to show you he can swim. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 18, 2018, 10:04:06 PM
I'm worried if I say so that it'll be counterproductive and I may be accused of being one person with two usernames**, but that's the kind  of even-handed answer I'd like to borrow (the part about two-sided sympathy and an unanswerable question), Bayareabadger.

**  :- )
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 10:15:08 PM
Sigh. Please do me the courtesy (or special favor) of reading this and get back to me if your opinion is unchanged
I had read that before.  I liked it, and I fact I may have stated that.  I actually agree with it.
Unfortunately that’s not a message that is being heard or understood.
Here is how it goes:
Coaches wife claims DV over long period of time. Claims boss knew about it.
Reaction is swift, and closed to debate.  Boss is a douche who covered up DV. Look! There are texts that prove it!  He should be fired immediately since DV is currently in the social spotlight as a cardinal sin.  
Everything that follows, including a thorough investigation by very talented and qualified people, indicating that was not the case at all, is viewed as lies and excuse by those media and talking heads that came to their conclusion on day one. It’s guilty until proven innocent with the asterisk that your never innocent.
That’s a microcosm of many situations.   All Meyer has tried to do since is show contrition for mistakes in giving a guy too much leash because of his affinity for his grandad and his penchant for thinking ha can fix everyone. And most of all, disprove the narrative that he covered up DV. The facts support him.  But nobody cares what he has to say, because he was judged by the accusations themselves.  And not just judged, outcast as if he actually beat his own wife.  Nobody is talking about ZS, the real dufus or Gene Smith.  And why?its our societies desire to bring down people who are successful, or more successful than their guy.  “  Look- he isn’t a winner at all, he is bad guy because he covered up DV.”  It. Onveniently fits their narrative, but there is no regard for the real truth or the person who is being destroyed.
What did he actually do wrong?  He kept  a guy employed that deserved not to be. Was it to win?  Nobody believes he is a great coach so that doesn’t fly. It was stupid, but worthy of all of this?  He said he thought about firing him, but thought that would not help his wife or kids. He would have no income.
He didn’t  tell  compliance?  Wow, two other  people he respected thought the same, and we all know they could not do anything.
And yet I come on this football board and have to read this shit from people who clearly are motivated by more than just justice.  They have their own agenda.  Ever notice the hate comes mostly from Blue fans?  Go back through the thread.  It jumps out at you.
Look- everybody is entitled to their own opinion. I respect that. But like so many issues in our world today- they are swayed by self interest and don’t think about what is actually fair and balanced.  It just me me me me...
That’s why this pisses me off so much.  The guy is no saint, that’s for sure.  He can be smug and arrogant to mention a few things.   But to people who really know him, with one exception I am aware of (CS)( and although I have met him I can’t say I know him but I know a number of people that do) they would tell you his greatest fault is that he cares too much, tries to help everyone, and mostly, does not put up with any bullshit like hitting a female.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 18, 2018, 10:23:42 PM
This is a tough nut to crack, and I mean that from a human element.
On one hand, if someone was accused of something that I believed to be not true, I'd feel a great deal of sympathy. On the other, if someone I knew was assaulted and utterly not believed, I'd have a great deal of sympathy as well. It's a somewhat unanswerable question.
I suppose I'd try to have sympathy for all. It gets a little muddier when we're talking about damage control, muddled messages and press conferences. I heard on a podcast about the idea of complimenting someone for handling it well, like we're fans of non-answers. Urban gave some real answers, some odd non-answers. He ended up looking not great. Maybe that's because of the PC mob. Maybe it's because he didn't put much to bed. Maybe it's because he showed himself to be the cynic's image of him, snarling and indignant, handed a life vest but a little to proud to show you he can swim.
Pretty well said.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on September 19, 2018, 08:23:06 AM
I just read we have moved past the Postmodernism movement and we are now into a "post truth" generation. Post Truth is defined by saying there is an absolute Truth, but my opinions and bias are more important. We cherry-pick parts of the truth that reinforce our bias and minimize or ignore other parts. 

I feel ( 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2018, 09:11:14 AM
Then you frightened by me.  I don’t see it.
As I have said from the beginning, and it is more obvious now, nobody believed CS, including the cops.
As Urban said, what was firing ZS going to do to protect her and the kids? Nothing.
This is really more of a social outrage issue, and a guy who thought he could fix something and gave a guy too many chances.
And now that he looked straight into the camera and said repeatedly, that he never deleted a single message, and there was never any evidence that he di, I believe him.
I actually think he is not good in front of cameras, but I am thankful he is substantially better in front of the cameras than some other high profile coaches in the league, even on his bad days.
Hate on......
Let me clarify something the whole Zack/Courtney chamber pot is a minute reason I can't stand UFM.Coaches wives have come out and said they weren't aware of abuse.Others said they were always fighting.Courtney's own mother repeatedly said she had an attitude/alcohol problem(as if he didn't) and had got in Zach's face also.Beat reporters and I believe it was Ramzy from 11 Warriors said everyone knew about Zach - either late or no show to both staff & team meetings.They also knew that Courtney was a problem child.Ramzey had said something along the lines like "nobody liked Courtney,which is odd because no one liked Zach either."
  McMurphy broke 2 stories the morning of july23rd,Later that morning Zach is fired.Now I doubt that is coincidental but for the sake of argument let's say it is.Urban Fookin' Meyer knew this festering boil had to be lanced along time ago.He is paid more than handsomely to make sure it is.I don't think for one minute Courtney is a victim but she played that card the minute her meal ticket had been pulled.
  The smug narcissist UFM couldn't even take a whole 2 minutes to write a statement addressing the dismissal.Oh Hey thanx,Coach - biggest fargin' media event of the year and you blew it off like you are beyond reproach.A properly worded statement would have went a long was assuaging the shitstorm that followed.Instead the face of the Football program and to some extent the University(like it or not) smells like a bag or burning rats in a Meth Lab.
  Meyer grotesquely dismisses & brushes aside inquires from the media who unlike him are prepared and fulfilling their obligations to their employers.He badly stumbles thru some deflections then presents the subject matter as a made up story.Now anyone who can't see that Urbz was either a smug and/or condescending incompetent dick is a blatantly blinded Homer.Most of the us older fans are pissed this poser dragged the good name thru the abyss.And a lot of Grads - even younger ones are not wearing the gear on game day the way they use to !!!.I don't want to hear the wankers attempt to to smooth things over.He talked a lot of shit when in Gainesville and that habit has reared it's ugly head again in C-Bus.Fix something?Ya of his own making,who's fault is that?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2018, 09:33:19 AM
And once Urban came under the microscope, he made a lot of bad PR mistakes. All of them were predictable in advance and avoidable.
I believe that to be spot on - well said,the guy is use to talking to 18-22 year olds who he holds much sway over.It's when he steps out of that realm it turns into whack-a-mole.Again Urbz,don't piss down our backs and tell us it's raining
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2018, 09:38:54 AM
And once Urban came under the microscope, he made a lot of bad PR mistakes. All of them were predictable in advance and avoidable.
Urban is who we thought he was
He's terrible at PR because he's above the public.  He has no need for a relationship with the public.
He's never been wrong about anything and therefore there's no reason to apologize.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 19, 2018, 09:57:38 AM
Let me clarify something the whole Zack/Courtney chamber pot is a minute reason I can't stand UFM.Coaches wives have come out and said they weren't aware of abuse.Others said they were always fighting.Courtney's own mother repeatedly said she had an attitude/alcohol problem(as if he didn't) and had got in Zach's face also.Beat reporters and I believe it was Ramzy from 11 Warriors said everyone knew about Zach - either late or no show to both staff & team meetings.They also knew that Courtney was a problem child.Ramzey had said something along the lines like "nobody liked Courtney,which is odd because no one liked Zach either."
  McMurphy broke 2 stories the morning of july23rd,Later that morning Zach is fired.Now I doubt that is coincidental but for the sake of argument let's say it is.Urban Fookin' Meyer knew this festering boil had to be lanced along time ago.He is paid more than handsomely to make sure it is.I don't think for one minute Courtney is a victim but she played that card the minute her meal ticket had been pulled.
  The smug narcissist UFM couldn't even take a whole 2 minutes to write a statement addressing the dismissal.Oh Hey thanx,Coach - biggest fargin' media event of the year and you blew it off like you are beyond reproach.A properly worded statement would have went a long was assuaging the shitstorm that followed.Instead the face of the Football program and to some extent the University(like it or not) smells like a bag or burning rats in a Meth Lab.
  Meyer grotesquely dismisses & brushes aside inquires from the media who unlike him are prepared and fulfilling their obligations to their employers.He badly stumbles thru some deflections then presents the subject matter as a made up story.Now anyone who can't see that Urbz was either a smug and/or condescending incompetent dick is a blatantly blinded Homer.Most of the us older fans are pissed this poser dragged the good name thru the abyss.And a lot of Grads - even younger ones are not wearing the gear on game day the way they use to !!!.I don't want to hear the wankers attempt to to smooth things over.He talked a lot of shit when in Gainesville and that habit has reared it's ugly head again in C-Bus.Fix something?Ya of his own making,who's fault is that?
wow- where have I heard this before.  If you don't see it the way I see it your an idiot.  perhaps deplorable too.   what a pile of rubbish this post is.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 19, 2018, 09:59:25 AM
Urban is who we thought he was
He's terrible at PR because he's above the public.  He has no need for a relationship with the public.
He's never been wrong about anything and therefore there's no reason to apologize.
further proof of my point. he has apologized lie 20 times, been ripped apart for his apologies, and you say this- does not think he owes an apology.  Nuts.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2018, 11:23:05 AM
Dude,

Urban's apologies are terrible

If he would actually sincerely apologize properly and be believable........... but he doesn't
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2018, 11:23:11 AM
wow- where have I heard this before.  If you don't see it the way I see it your an idiot.  perhaps deplorable too.   what a pile of rubbish this post is.
where have we heard this before....probably Gainesville.That's not a mistake it's a trend.He's always sorry when the obvious is pointed out.There is an old saying - don't be sorry,don't be doing it.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2018, 11:30:47 AM
example:

He will not admit to lying at the Big Ten Media days.  He just misspoke



http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=24707867 (http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=24707867)
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 19, 2018, 11:53:16 AM
example:

He will not admit to lying at the Big Ten Media days.  He just misspoke



http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=24707867 (http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=24707867)
So that morning of the Big Ten media days, he got off the elevator and was approached by several members of the media and was asked the same question you are claiming he lied on. He gave them the exact same answer and said that the 2015 incident did not involve an arrest and he did not understand why that’s being sent now.
 So that morning of the Big Ten media days, he got off the elevator and was approached by several members of the media and was asked the same question you are claiming he lied. He gave them the exact same answer and said that the 2015 incident did not involve an arrest and he did not understand why that’s being said now. 
 So he got that same question and gave that same answer – he didn’t understand why this was being called an arrest. So basically he wasn’t doing a very good job of listening to the question or being thorough. 
 His texts which have been made public, from the night before prove that. He asked several people from Ohio State, including the athletic director, to dig up the stuff from 2015 because “I don’t want to be wrong tomorrow“  
 So it is very obvious that he did not want to give out wrong information about the 2015 incident. Do you think he would lie to one set of reporters in a big room only after having said something different to small group of reporters a couple hours before? 
He did not lie that big 10 meetings or at least did not intend to. He was saying that this new report showing that there was an arrest in 2015 was bullshit, because it was
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 19, 2018, 11:54:39 AM
where have we heard this before....probably Gainesville.That's not a mistake it's a trend.He's always sorry when the obvious is pointed out.There is an old saying - don't be sorry,don't be doing it.
Doing what?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2018, 12:37:01 PM
SMDH - Oh nothing,absolutely nothing there weren't like 34 player arrests during his tenure there.No worries what so ever they were being addressed with the tried and true "Circle of Trust".The envy & blueprint for such obstacles for Programs across the land.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 19, 2018, 12:39:19 PM
SMDH - Oh nothing,absolutely nothing there weren't like 34 player arrests during his tenure there.No worries what so ever they were being addressed with the tried and true "Circle of Trust".The envy & blueprint for such obstacles for Programs across the land.
Oh- your talking about Florida.  Gotcha.  
Thanks for clarifying this.  
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2018, 01:02:50 PM
yup. Florida and everywhere else Urban has been

This is not about Ohio State, it's about Urban
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2018, 01:24:03 PM
Unfortunately guilt by association,how he faffed up the Media Day Presser then strings along the sad Smith saga and still makes in excess of 6.5 mil per is not only cause for reflection but much bitterness
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: betarhoalphadelta on September 19, 2018, 01:47:27 PM
I will add, I guarantee you that you don’t believe for a second that reporting it to compliance would have changed a single thing. Your too smart to think otherwise.

Asking your staff to get and follow the police investigation, conferring with your boss and your Title 9 officer and Human Resources, and asking your troubled employee every day if things are ok at home....but the hey, compliance( who has no authority in this matter) would magically save the day.

And if he had,  not one person out there- including you, would have a different opinion.  Truth.  

There are multiple issues here. I honestly don't believe that Urban condones DV, and had he found Courtney credible, and truly believe Zach hit her, I think he would have been gone.

The problem is the pattern:



The pattern is one of continually protecting someone who was a ticking time bomb. Of withholding key information from Gene Smith and HR during the 2015 investigation that could have affected their recommendations or decisions in the matter. Of allowing himself to be blinded by nepotism in his loyalty to Earl Bruce's progeny to the detriment of the team, and eventually of his own and the university's reputation.

The pattern is that while none of us know whether ZS actually committed DV, Urban showed a consistent pattern to shield ZS from scrutiny and accountability, and thus it's hard for anyone outside of Columbus to truly believe that he would have taken the right steps absent basically a smoking gun.

Again, I think Urban probably found CS to lack credibility, and believed that while the relationship between CS and ZS was toxic, that Zach wasn't abusing her. But one wonders--absent an eyewitness report of ZS slugging Courtney--how long Urban would have looked the other way?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2018, 01:51:31 PM
well, the noble Urban has admitted that bringing Zach to tOSU was a mistake

god bless him for that revelation.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2018, 02:01:39 PM
There are multiple issues here. I honestly don't believe that Urban condones DV, and had he found Courtney credible, and truly believe Zach hit her, I think he would have been gone.
This,neither do most of us it's just the on going circus,that he should have brought down the hammer a long time ago.Urbs obviously knew about his drinking and missing meetings.That bad relationship would have got Zach dismissed at a lot less lucrative positions - so that's something the two brats had to figure out for themselves.But UFM's handling of this abortion that he nurtured for 6 seasons is the crux of the froth
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2018, 02:02:19 PM
well, the noble Urban has admitted that bringing Zach to tOSU was a mistake

god bless him for that revelation.
Testify FF Testify
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 19, 2018, 02:15:51 PM
  • In 2014, ZS goes to a strip club with HS coaches. It's not clear whether this is an NCAA violation, but Urban was without a doubt aware of this and didn't report a potential violation to Compliance.
  • In the 2015 investigation, in addition to not reporting anything to Compliance, Urban apparently didn't report anything about the 2009 allegations to Gene Smith, to HR, to anyone. Seems like this would be highly pertinent information for anyone monitoring the investigation.
  • Through late 2015 and into 2016, ZS had numerous issues. Being late. Not going on recruiting trips and lying to say he was there. Gene even recommended that Urban fire ZS over this, and he did not do so. 
There is enough right there for termination.Those oversights are not those of responsible leader of BlueBlood program.I didn't know UFM knew about the stip clubs with HS Coaches no less,and he did nothing.Yup he should have lanced that boil along time ago.And The Ohio State University should lance the boil named Urban Meyer - accountability and conduct unbecoming
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MaximumSam on September 19, 2018, 04:37:57 PM
Honestly, I just don't care.  He had a big turd on the staff and didn't fire him quick enough.  Now they've flushed the turd, taken their penance, and on we go.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2018, 04:48:29 PM
agreed

I don't care

I assumed this would be the outcome all along
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 19, 2018, 05:18:38 PM
Ohio State's Ryan Day will be paid a bonus of $487,000 at the end of the month for his work leading the Buckeyes football team in Urban Meyer's absence. Meyer will lose more than $500,000 as a result of his recent suspension.

Day signed the contract addendum for the bonus pay this Monday, according to records released Wednesday by Ohio State. Meyer praised Day's work as "elite" during the past six weeks, during which No. 4 Ohio State won its first three games of the season.

Day was the team's top leader from Aug. 1 through Sept. 2. He also served as the head coach during games in the following two weeks. That means he was paid more than $14,000 per day on top of his $1 million salary for his work as the acting head coach.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on September 19, 2018, 08:23:47 PM
Let me clarify something the whole Zack/Courtney chamber pot is a minute reason I can't stand UFM.Coaches wives have come out and said they weren't aware of abuse.Others said they were always fighting.Courtney's own mother repeatedly said she had an attitude/alcohol problem(as if he didn't) and had got in Zach's face also.Beat reporters and I believe it was Ramzy from 11 Warriors said everyone knew about Zach - either late or no show to both staff & team meetings.They also knew that Courtney was a problem child.Ramzey had said something along the lines like "nobody liked Courtney,which is odd because no one liked Zach either."
  McMurphy broke 2 stories the morning of july23rd,Later that morning Zach is fired.Now I doubt that is coincidental but for the sake of argument let's say it is.Urban Fookin' Meyer knew this festering boil had to be lanced along time ago.He is paid more than handsomely to make sure it is.I don't think for one minute Courtney is a victim but she played that card the minute her meal ticket had been pulled.
  The smug narcissist UFM couldn't even take a whole 2 minutes to write a statement addressing the dismissal.Oh Hey thanx,Coach - biggest fargin' media event of the year and you blew it off like you are beyond reproach.A properly worded statement would have went a long was assuaging the shitstorm that followed.Instead the face of the Football program and to some extent the University(like it or not) smells like a bag or burning rats in a Meth Lab.
  Meyer grotesquely dismisses & brushes aside inquires from the media who unlike him are prepared and fulfilling their obligations to their employers.He badly stumbles thru some deflections then presents the subject matter as a made up story.Now anyone who can't see that Urbz was either a smug and/or condescending incompetent dick is a blatantly blinded Homer.Most of the us older fans are pissed this poser dragged the good name thru the abyss.And a lot of Grads - even younger ones are not wearing the gear on game day the way they use to !!!.I don't want to hear the wankers attempt to to smooth things over.He talked a lot of shit when in Gainesville and that habit has reared it's ugly head again in C-Bus.Fix something?Ya of his own making,who's fault is that?
Wow. This thread really blew up since yesterday when I thought the tweet would be the final talking point, which would quietly end it. Nubbz, this post is hilriously epic because it’s the type of feedback I’m hearing from all of my buddies. Most of them started out defending him initially, but now they’re just pissed and wish he’d stfu. Smug and condescending are definitely common terms being used.
HB - as someone that deeply respects you, I encourage you to walk away from this one. Your responses aren’t you. Your anger isn’t you. I think it’s fair to say you see it different than quite a few people. This topic isn’t bringing out the best of this group. Maybe pack it in?
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 19, 2018, 09:32:59 PM
There is enough right there for termination.Those oversights are not those of responsible leader of BlueBlood program.I didn't know UFM knew about the stip clubs with HS Coaches no less,and he did nothing.Yup he should have lanced that boil along time ago.And The Ohio State University should lance the boil named Urban Meyer - accountability and conduct unbecoming
At least get your facts straight.  When he found out about the strip club he gave both coaches a termination warning and wrote a morality clause about THE NEXT DAY
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 19, 2018, 09:36:15 PM
Wow. This thread really blew up since yesterday when I thought the tweet would be the final talking point, which would quietly end it. Nubbz, this post is hilriously epic because it’s the type of feedback I’m hearing from all of my buddies. Most of them started out defending him initially, but now they’re just pissed and wish he’d stfu. Smug and condescending are definitely common terms being used.
HB - as someone that deeply respects you, I encourage you to walk away from this one. Your responses aren’t you. Your anger isn’t you. I think it’s fair to say you see it different than quite a few people. This topic isn’t bringing out the best of this group. Maybe pack it in?
Walk away lol.  These posts prove my point.  
People pile on, get their facts completely wrong and create a false narrative to suit them. 
Again, did he cover up or enable DV?  Obviously not. Yet that is the narrative 
It’s actually humorous.  It’s like watching sheep. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 19, 2018, 11:32:51 PM
At least get your facts straight.  When he found out about the strip club he gave both coaches a termination warning and wrote a morality clause about THE NEXT DAY
Nubbz will let me know if I'm wrong but when he typed "did nothing," I think he was just trying to say "didn't go to Compliance for the strip club situation" in fewer words.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 19, 2018, 11:43:26 PM
Btw, HB, I think it's fair to point out that almost all Michigan fans are all over this. And no doubt that is at least partly due to football psychology and therefore at least partly embarrassing for us. Because the highest integrity way to respond would be to shut off our football lizard brains, make sure the woman is ok, speak calmly about justice in simple terms and never get excited about the football consequences.
However, just because Michigan fans are all over it, getting warrior-like about DV, and "oh man are they going to lose extra games now?!!!" doesn't also mean that the average M fan opinion is wrong. It's tacky for sure. But whether they also have an incorrect view of Urban's errors is an entirely different thing.
To answer that - and this is the sort of thing that is very challenging to answer honestly so perhaps it's of no use - we'd have to imagine the scenario where Urban did all of these same things at Florida and then was hired at Michigan (not OSU) where he brought Zach and both did all the same things and made all the same July/August headlines. In that alternate universe, how would each side respond?
I'm pretty sure Michigan fans would defend him like family and OSU fans would be out for blood.
At some level, we're all defective idiots when it comes to scandals and our teams. That doesn't mean that "the other side" can't be right. Just that it's fair to be skeptical of their motives and, if they are right, to clarify that they are largely right for the wrong reasons. Correct out of coincidence, not out of smarts or morals.
In this situation, I'd say many (most?) Michigan fans have been super tacky but also correct for accidental reasons.
(Right about Urban making a whole lot of bad mistakes but their correctness is for the wrong reasons because many Michigan fans would have been locked and loaded with that opinion even if it hadn't actually been true)
In that sense I suppose I'm saying that when it comes to sports emotions and rivalries, we're all broken clocks, and - despite our mixed up grasp of reality - still correct twice daily.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 19, 2018, 11:57:21 PM
https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10212142369103324&id=1498798014&__tn__=K-R (https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10212142369103324&id=1498798014&__tn__=K-R)


This sums it up for me.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 20, 2018, 09:17:11 AM
At least get your facts straight.  When he found out about the strip club he gave both coaches a termination warning and wrote a morality clause about THE NEXT DAY
Oh that's just rich,Urban warned him about his drinking,Urban warned him about being late to meetings,Urban,warned him about domestic violence,Urban warned him about taking recruits coaches to strip clubs and drinking - that he previously warned him about.But,but,but Shelley and Urbz counseled Courtney and Zach back in 2009 in Gainesville(Urbans words) so if he is to be believed there wouldn't be a need for at least 3 more warnings(that I know about) after that about juvenile behavior.And you don't see a trend there?Yup like the song says "I'm frightened by those who don't see it".
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on September 20, 2018, 10:21:44 AM
Wow. This thread really blew up since yesterday when I thought the tweet would be the final talking point, which would quietly end it. Nubbz, this post is hilriously epic because it’s the type of feedback I’m hearing from all of my buddies. Most of them started out defending him initially, but now they’re just pissed and wish he’d stfu. Smug and condescending are definitely common terms being used.
HB - as someone that deeply respects you, I encourage you to walk away from this one. Your responses aren’t you. Your anger isn’t you. I think it’s fair to say you see it different than quite a few people. This topic isn’t bringing out the best of this group. Maybe pack it in?
As one of the older fan, that I guess is in the minority according to Mrnubbz, I hope HB continues to responds to what I consider to be over the top responses to Urban's handling of the whole thing. While many of us don't agree with how Urban handled this whole thing, we "reasonably" think there was nothing to warrant the suspension based on observing the events as they unfolded and reading the report that was produced. We find the hyperbole being spouted (and I use that word intentionally) to be so over the top to be ridiculous.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on September 20, 2018, 10:24:51 AM
I just read we have moved past the Postmodernism movement and we are now into a "post truth" generation. Post Truth is defined by saying there is an absolute Truth, but my opinions and bias are more important. We cherry-pick parts of the truth that reinforce our bias and minimize or ignore other parts.

I feel (
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Riffraft on September 20, 2018, 10:28:52 AM
https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10212142369103324&id=1498798014&__tn__=K-R (https://m.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10212142369103324&id=1498798014&__tn__=K-R)


This sums it up for me.
Looks about right to me
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: bayareabadger on September 20, 2018, 10:30:29 AM
Walk away lol.  These posts prove my point.  
People pile on, get their facts completely wrong and create a false narrative to suit them.
Again, did he cover up or enable DV?  Obviously not. Yet that is the narrative
It’s actually humorous.  It’s like watching sheep.
So, if I may, if I argue Urby did not do this very specific thing, but feel he did several other things wrong and came off as a gross and disingenuous human, you would not fight me on this?

I guess my question is, is the narrative you're railing against the specificity of his role in DV discussions or something larger about him in general? 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 20, 2018, 11:32:47 AM

Again, did he cover up or enable DV?  Obviously not. Yet that is the narrative
Although it's not obvious that Urban did or did not cover up or enable DV, It's definitely not my narrative and doesn't seem to be the narrative on this thread.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 20, 2018, 12:46:20 PM
It's definitely not my narrative and doesn't seem to be the narrative on this thread.

Yeah, I think the thread has been much more zoomed in than "was there enabling/covering up?" I'll admit that was the discussion when we lacked info before the investigation went public. But then we transitioned into facts.

Since then, this thread has been almost entirely about three things:

Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 20, 2018, 12:59:04 PM
So, if I may, if I argue Urby did not do this very specific thing, but feel he did several other things wrong and came off as a gross and disingenuous human, you would not fight me on this?

I guess my question is, is the narrative you're railing against the specificity of his role in DV discussions or something larger about him in general?
 No-you nailed it.  
I don’t much care what rabid OSU or UM fans say or think.   I mean let’s face it-they are totally self serving as a mob.  Hell- the UM fans were calling for Dantonios head with the Nassau episode. 
But I continue to fall into the false myth that folks on this board tend to be more balanced- more interested in the big picture.  And it kicks me in the gut each time. Many here with nothing different than mob mentality.  
Believe it or not- I have never been a huge Meyer fan. When he came to OSU I said “my jury is out”
One of my favorite games of all time was Lloyd kicking his ass in his last game.  And Meyer’s response to that loss was to crucify his players in public.  WhT a dick-that was my thought at the time. 
But I have paid a lot of attention to his treatment of players and families, the types of kids he is recruiting, the punishment he doles out when players step out of line, what players and their families say about their experience during recruiting, and before an after when they leave. 
It tells me he has made an intense concerted effort to do better than he did at UF. The families consistently praise the program for going way beyond football to help the kids, and consistently talk about OSU NOT negative recruiting, and more often the negative recruiting that people do against them.  
So yeah. He screwed the whole ZS thing up.  But that’s substantially different and more human then what most read IMO it, which is just disappointing for people on this board- IMO. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: SuperMario on September 20, 2018, 12:59:10 PM
Walk away lol.  These posts prove my point.  
People pile on, get their facts completely wrong and create a false narrative to suit them.
Again, did he cover up or enable DV?  Obviously not. Yet that is the narrative
It’s actually humorous.  It’s like watching sheep.
How does my post prove your point? From day 1 I've never stated he covered up DV, but I had the bigger issue with his dishonesty at media day and his smugness. My trail of disdain goes all the way back to BG & how he lied to his players about his departure and then replicated something similar at Utah. He's always been an opportunist that uses people to win. The guy is so arrogant, he can't let this entire thing go and continues to run his mouth. The second that's brought up, you circle back to covering up or enabling domestic violence.  I offered friendly advice because you're consistently calling people sheep and making it personal because someone has a difference of opinion.
Just odd to see you make enemies with folks here defending a guy with a trail of character issues. To repeat, I'm not claiming one of them is covering up domestic violence.
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Honestbuckeye on September 20, 2018, 01:03:40 PM
How does my post prove your point? From day 1 I've never stated he covered up DV, but I had the bigger issue with his dishonesty at media day and his smugness. My trail of disdain goes all the way back to BG & how he lied to his players about his departure and then replicated something similar at Utah. He's always been an opportunist that uses people to win. The guy is so arrogant, he can't let this entire thing go and continues to run his mouth. The second that's brought up, you circle back to covering up or enabling domestic violence.  I offered friendly advice because you're consistently calling people sheep and making it personal because someone has a difference of opinion.
Just odd to see you make enemies with folks here defending a guy with a trail of character issues. To repeat, I'm not claiming one of them is covering up domestic violence.
I wasn’t referring to you Super. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Entropy on September 20, 2018, 01:09:14 PM
I think we can agree on Urban, like Saban, views the media or these PR needs to be a nuisance to what they want to accomplish.    You can extend that to they think they are above questioning... but whatever.   At the core, they are annoyed by PR and Media.

Everything else is bias shaped by past events or relationship to OSU.    Nebraska fans view St. Thomas de la Osborne differently than the media portrayed him in 1995.   Knocking the king off is great media.   So I hesitate to trash anyone without warrant.  

That said...  I feel Urban knows his job is to win games.   You justify recruiting, staffing, etc based upon that goal... what he's paid to do.  Doesn't mean you're pro recruiting criminals or want wife beaters on your staff, but human nature is to explain or see what we want.  Perhaps it was a tough upbringing and getting him out of that environment will change him.  Perhaps the couple is in counseling and what matters they are working on it.  I don't think Urban is different than many other coaches in that regard.   But if you held him on the pedestal of someone like Saint Tom Osborne, you'll be disappointed.   I had not... he's what he was at Florida.  

If I do have an issue with Urban.... it seemed oblivious to the current climate on violence towards women.   I do believe he was tone death to it. 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 20, 2018, 01:16:29 PM
As one of the older fan, that I guess is in the minority according to Mrnubbz,
RR,I'm not on the DV bandwagon it's all the other crap,drinking,strip bars,late or absent to meetings excessively so and ad nauseam,across 2 programs and 10 yrs.And then not having a professional,prompt and rational response to media inquiries.After giving the Program/University a black eye he doesn't deserve to rake in 6-7 million and certainly not in C-Bus.Hey at least we'll get him started on his true calling - Politics,he naturally possesses the needed attributes/qualities
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 20, 2018, 01:53:53 PM
Yeah, I think the thread has been much more zoomed in than "was there enabling/covering up?" I'll admit that was the discussion when we lacked info before the investigation went public. But then we transitioned into facts.

Since then, this thread has been almost entirely about three things:
  • Urban and his DFO conspired to delete text messages
I don't think this is that condemning,people wipe clean their phones/PCs all the time - its even recommended.Although it appears seedy because of the corresponding timeline to an inquiry.Like Zachs dismissal right after an incredibly unflattering story(s) broke.There is a lot of coincidences involved if you're expecting to be taken credibly 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 20, 2018, 02:01:39 PM
my gut tells me that text messages were deleted from Urban's phone

probably by some college kid in the football office that knows more about phones than Urban

the report had a strong statement regarding this issue
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 20, 2018, 02:11:31 PM
Ain't nothin' but a thing - move along!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 20, 2018, 02:46:26 PM
I've moved

42 pages was plenty for me
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: Anonymous Coward on September 20, 2018, 02:55:17 PM
I don't think this is that condemning,people wipe clean their phones/PCs all the time - its even recommended.Although it appears seedy because of the corresponding timeline to an inquiry.Like Zachs dismissal right after an incredibly unflattering story(s) broke.There is a lot of coincidences involved if you're expecting to be taken credibly
I'm not saying it happened for sure and Urban absolutely may have already had his phone set up to automatically delete messages before any of this happened. The concerning part isn't that they were deleted, it's that the investigation revealed a conversation between Urban and his DFO that things were getting "bad" and his text messages should be deleted. 
As in the report: "Often, although not always, such reactions evidence consciousness of guilt."
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 20, 2018, 03:17:36 PM
Well just color me shocked
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 20, 2018, 03:18:39 PM
I've moved

42 pages was plenty for me
We'll be welcoming Nebraska to the BIG shortly
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: FearlessF on September 20, 2018, 03:34:20 PM
I will dig up that long lost thread!
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: MrNubbz on September 20, 2018, 04:32:07 PM
Please no,in the name of all that's holy and righteous 
Title: Re: Is Urby In Trouble Here?
Post by: TyphonInc on September 20, 2018, 09:27:30 PM
There are multiple issues here. I honestly don't believe that Urban condones DV, and had he found Courtney credible, and truly believe Zach hit her, I think he would have been gone.

The problem is the pattern:

  • Knew of and was involved in the 2009 allegations, in which no charges were filed. Obviously doesn't prove anything about ZS, but goes to show that clearly there were issues in that marriage.
  • When hiring ZS at OSU, didn't disclose the 2009 issues at all. As stated by the report, he was not required to disclose them, but given future points discussed below, is a potential judgement error.
  • In 2014, ZS goes to a strip club with HS coaches. It's not clear whether this is an NCAA violation, but Urban was without a doubt aware of this and didn't report a potential violation to Compliance.
  • In the 2015 investigation, in addition to not reporting anything to Compliance, Urban apparently didn't report anything about the 2009 allegations to Gene Smith, to HR, to anyone. Seems like this would be highly pertinent information for anyone monitoring the investigation.
  • Through late 2015 and into 2016, ZS had numerous issues. Being late. Not going on recruiting trips and lying to say he was there. Gene even recommended that Urban fire ZS over this, and he did not do so.
  • June 2016 Urban advised ZS to go into rehab for a substance abuse issue.
  • Upon the start of the investigation, Urban apparently looked into ways to clear old text messages--whether he deleted any is unknown. Perhaps his phone already had the setting turned on so he didn't have to, and thus could truthfully say he didn't delete anything because the setting already took care of it.  


The pattern is one of continually protecting someone who was a ticking time bomb. Of withholding key information from Gene Smith and HR during the 2015 investigation that could have affected their recommendations or decisions in the matter. Of allowing himself to be blinded by nepotism in his loyalty to Earl Bruce's progeny to the detriment of the team, and eventually of his own and the university's reputation.

The pattern is that while none of us know whether ZS actually committed DV, Urban showed a consistent pattern to shield ZS from scrutiny and accountability, and thus it's hard for anyone outside of Columbus to truly believe that he would have taken the right steps absent basically a smoking gun.

Again, I think Urban probably found CS to lack credibility, and believed that while the relationship between CS and ZS was toxic, that Zach wasn't abusing her. But one wonders--absent an eyewitness report of ZS slugging Courtney--how long Urban would have looked the other way?
I think this pretty much sums up what I concluded from the whole ordeal. Great post @bwarbiany (https://www.cfb51.com/index.php?topic=4913.msg67630#msg67630)