header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 3366 3367 [3368] 3369   Go Down
Author

Topic: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes

 (Read 3694192 times)

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9662
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47138 on: Today at 12:40:57 PM »
Quote from: brisco_0317 on Today at 12:19:41 PM
It’s weird to see political commentary in a thread labeled “Politics Thread”?  LOL
It’s weird to see posters on the sports and lifestyle board who post only in the political thread. Especially for this board, which historically banished this thread.
Logged

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9662
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47139 on: Today at 12:52:04 PM »
Quote from: utee94 on Today at 12:40:16 PM
First you have to define exactly what gerrymandering is.  Seems obvious on its face but what types of drawn boundaries are "acceptable" and what ones are considered "gerrymandered?"

Is there some percentage or deviation from a geographic line determining the midpoint of a specified population that determines it? 

Is it vibes?

Is it something else?
I would describe it as an act of intentional drawing of borders to either consolidate power or create outcomes that stretch well past the projected representations of the electorate. 

It’s a bit odd because it can be done with methods of both dilution and concentration. 
Logged

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47140 on: Today at 12:56:54 PM »
Quote from: bayareabadger on Today at 12:52:04 PM
I would describe it as an act of intentional drawing of borders to either consolidate power or create outcomes that stretch well past the projected representations of the electorate.

It’s a bit odd because it can be done with methods of both dilution and concentration.

That's not objective, it's not scientific, it's wildly open for interpretation and debate, and is therefore a completely useless definition.

Like I said, it seems easy on its face.  It practice it's almost impossible to define and calculate in a manner which won't seem unfair in one way or another.
Logged

brisco_0317

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 123
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47141 on: Today at 12:57:41 PM »
Quote from: bayareabadger on Today at 12:40:57 PM
It’s weird to see posters on the sports and lifestyle board who post only in the political thread. Especially for this board, which historically banished this thread.

Just because you haven’t seen posts I’ve made in other threads doesn’t mean they aren’t happening.  

Where should I be posting political stuff if not here?

If you don’t want to see political stuff, you can ignore this thread - no one is forcing you to participate here.  

FTR, I’m a Badger too.  
Logged

brisco_0317

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 123
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47142 on: Today at 12:58:28 PM »
Quote from: bayareabadger on Today at 12:52:04 PM
I would describe it as an act of intentional drawing of borders to either consolidate power or create outcomes that stretch well past the projected representations of the electorate.

It’s a bit odd because it can be done with methods of both dilution and concentration.

Should only one party be able to do it?
Logged

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 23503
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47143 on: Today at 12:59:19 PM »
Pretty sure brisco is here at the invitation of our esteemed fellow, 847.

I'm always happy to see new posters around here, we don't get much new blood.
Logged

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 20532
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47144 on: Today at 01:24:41 PM »

Who is this esteemed 847 you speak of ? This new feller just might ratchet up UW's street cred around here 🙃
Logged
"An ignorant person is one who doesn't know what you have just found out" - Will Rogers

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9662
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47145 on: Today at 01:50:03 PM »
Quote from: utee94 on Today at 12:56:54 PM
That's not objective, it's not scientific, it's wildly open for interpretation and debate, and is therefore a completely useless definition.

Like I said, it seems easy on its face.  It practice it's almost impossible to define and calculate in a manner which won't seem unfair in one way or another.
I mean, if everything had to have a locked in, uninterpretable definition or else it was useless and not worth discussing, this thread would be a lot shorter. 

If I use models and data and design a map with the intent of making the final product of elections does not represent the larger picture of the electorate in a drastic way that favors some outcome, I as the map drawer want, we can call that whatever we like. 

But I take it from this answer, you feel what I described, even without a precise definition I can call up on hand, is good or at least fine, and that's AOK. 
Logged

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9662
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47146 on: Today at 01:52:07 PM »
Quote from: brisco_0317 on Today at 12:57:41 PM
Just because you haven’t seen posts I’ve made in other threads doesn’t mean they aren’t happening. 

Where should I be posting political stuff if not here?

If you don’t want to see political stuff, you can ignore this thread - no one is forcing you to participate here. 

FTR, I’m a Badger too. 
I thought about that first part, and so I looked before I posted (the site has a feature for that). 

I mean, there's a whole internet where people talk politics. 

But it's a free board and country. I don't not want you on here. I find it a bit odd, that's all. 
Logged

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9662
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47147 on: Today at 01:54:23 PM »
Quote from: brisco_0317 on Today at 12:58:28 PM
Should only one party be able to do it?
Nope. Both should be able to do it, or it should be discouraged across the board. 

Do you fall on one side or the other on that? If doesn't seem so. 
Logged

brisco_0317

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 123
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47148 on: Today at 02:13:11 PM »
Quote from: bayareabadger on Today at 01:54:23 PM
Nope. Both should be able to do it, or it should be discouraged across the board.

Do you fall on one side or the other on that? If doesn't seem so.

No, I agree with you that both should be able to do it or no one.  The rhetoric is ridiculous. 
Logged

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9662
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47149 on: Today at 02:14:18 PM »
Quote from: brisco_0317 on Today at 02:13:11 PM
No, I agree with you that both should be able to do it or no one.  The rhetoric is ridiculous.
So you’re unopinionated in if both or no one is preferable? OK. 
Logged

brisco_0317

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 123
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47150 on: Today at 02:35:42 PM »
Quote from: bayareabadger on Today at 02:14:18 PM
So you’re unopinionated in if both or no one is preferable? OK.

I must’ve missed your opinion…
Logged

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9662
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #47151 on: Today at 02:42:41 PM »
Quote from: brisco_0317 on Today at 02:35:42 PM
I must’ve missed your opinion…
I think as a practice, I feel it’s undemocratic. I’d prefer no one do it. 

I also readily admit, actually solving it is quite tricky, as there’s no perfect map and setting an exact standard is pretty tough. Though I’d guess using the tools using to create gerrymandered maps, one could endeavor from something more reflectively representative. 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 3366 3367 [3368] 3369   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
Dock Signs-WeatherPROOF

Custom Bronco Badges