I'm comfortable with my drive-by post, above, except for the syntax errors. I'm not trying to change your minds on this one, I'm just pointing out a couple of different perspectives, depending on your sources of information and your biases (including my different sources of information and my biases).
Medina, I will concede that "my side"--including me--needs to come up with a better way to address what we see as obvious racial components in the immigration debate without calling people racists. I take at face value that you are not a racist. It's a conundrum--and one that I am thinking about because your point is well taken. But I do think the the Trump administration's immigration policies contain an element of racism. That doesn't mean that anyone who agrees with those policies is racist.
And I'm busy. And making highly inflammatory drive-by posts. Which is nice.
And Badge, of course you are correct that the Dems won't necessarily retake the House, but, yes, I'm fairly confident that they will, based more on history than anything else. You may be correct that this immigration debate is actually winning the right more moderates. I think it did last summer, but that was before implementation. We'll see how it goes now. Nonetheless, I'm confident in my prediction here. If I'm wrong, it will be historically significant. Take notes. Feel free to point that out to me in November 2026 if it doesn't come to pass.
