header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes

 (Read 4378855 times)

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11366
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46228 on: July 02, 2025, 11:49:06 AM »
I suspect the real reason, was to attempt to discredit CBS publicly and sow mistrust for mainstream media that is not Trump-friendly and/or conservative-friendly.  Which is pretty silly because anyone that is Trump-friendly already distrusts CBS, and anyone that is anti-Trump likely approves of CBS as much or more now, as a result.
THIS!

I had a long discussion about this concept on here but I want to raise the point again in regard to this particular issue.  Note that NOBODY is actually going after "normies" here.  For the Trump supporters this is just more evidence of media bias but, as you pointed out, it isn't like they needed more evidence, anyone who isn't FAR left has known for decades that the non-FOX media leans left and uses their position to distort and influence in that direction.  

For the anti-Trump group this is just another crime by Trump (see @bayareabadger 's extortion allegation) but again, they didn't need this in the least since they already have their 34 felonies.  

As I see it, this whole dust up probably convinced literally zero people to switch sides.  It is just more fuel for the fire for both sides without actually influencing any reachable voters.  

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11366
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46229 on: July 02, 2025, 11:51:32 AM »
Basically feels like similar bullshit. The kind your supporters rally behind, your enemies decry . . .
This is a disaster because note that we aren't even trying to reach/convince the other side or the theoretical "middle voters".  We are just creating red meat for our own camp.  

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9831
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46230 on: July 02, 2025, 12:00:13 PM »
This is a disaster because note that we aren't even trying to reach/convince the other side or the theoretical "middle voters".  We are just creating red meat for our own camp. 
It’s also a perverse and gross use of the legal system. 

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11366
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46231 on: July 02, 2025, 12:03:11 PM »
It’s also a perverse and gross use of the legal system.
I'd be more open to being bothered by that if that same legal system hadn't been used to gin up ridiculous "crimes" to get felony convictions against Trump by having a prosecutor who was elected to get him bring charges in a VERY anti-Trump jurisdiction then charge him with crimes that wouldn't be crimes if committed by anyone else and try the case in front of an anti-Trump judge to anti-Trump jurors then pretend they were legitimate convictions.  

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11366
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46232 on: July 02, 2025, 12:29:55 PM »
Yeah, all the due process people had no problem with due process violations to “get Trump”. 
And thus the "respect the process" ship sailed.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25016
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46233 on: July 02, 2025, 12:34:34 PM »
Eh, the "they did it first" finger-pointing can go back decades and probably generations.  It doesn't change the facts now.

Bullshit identity politics have absolutely destroyed any chance at civil discourse and unless/until people cut that out and reengage their brains, nothing is going to change or get better.


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87556
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46234 on: July 02, 2025, 12:59:07 PM »
The Newsom $787 figure has some history to it.

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9831
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46235 on: July 02, 2025, 01:11:51 PM »
Yeah, all the due process people had no problem with due process violations to “get Trump”. 
Stipulating I think those charges were mostly stupid, I don’t know that was a failure of “due process.”

He received a process. It didn’t seem like there were any notable violations there, at least on the legal side. 

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9831
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46236 on: July 02, 2025, 01:12:20 PM »
The Newsom $787 figure has some history to it.
Dumb trolling. 

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9831
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46237 on: July 02, 2025, 01:20:55 PM »
Eh, the "they did it first" finger-pointing can go back decades and probably generations.  It doesn't change the facts now.

Bullshit identity politics have absolutely destroyed any chance at civil discourse and unless/until people cut that out and reengage their brains, nothing is going to change or get better.

The thing that often gets me is the “for thee not for me” energy that often pervades this.

I don’t know that I’m 100 percent on this, but I usually try to say, if this was flipped in terms of parties, how would I feel? And then I try to use that to drill down on the actual act and my feelings on it. (That also requires a good bit of skepticism and distrust of folks I might be aligned with, something that often seems cast aside quickly in such discussions).

I suppose part of politics if getting joy from being mad and consuming nonsense. And a lot of that just leads to it boiling down to “go team” sort of fluff.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 87556
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46238 on: July 02, 2025, 01:22:39 PM »

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25016
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46239 on: July 02, 2025, 01:25:37 PM »
The thing that often gets me is the “for thee not for me” energy that often pervades this.

I don’t know that I’m 100 percent on this, but I usually try to say, if this was flipped in terms of parties, how would I feel?
And then I try to use that to drill down on the actual act and my feelings on it. (That also requires a good bit of skepticism and distrust of folks I might be aligned with, something that often seems cast aside quickly in such discussions).

I suppose part of politics if getting joy from being mad and consuming nonsense. And a lot of that just leads to it boiling down to “go team” sort of fluff.

I understand the intentions of such an exercise, but I think it's pretty much futile and it's impossible to be honest with yourself, as long as you're still existing in the world where you think in terms of "their party" and "my party" which, from your wording, it would appear you do.  I just don't believe there exists the capacity to be unbiased in such a mindspace.



medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11366
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46240 on: July 02, 2025, 01:38:31 PM »
There were like Hope Hicks testimony which SCOTUS said was protected but the main thing IMO has to do with a state judge denying the defense the ability to have the FEC commissioner testify about the federal campaign finance violation the prosecution alleged was one of the predicate crimes (that whole predicate crime debacle is another example).  Per the FEC commissioner, it wasn’t a crime which is I’m sure why the judge didn’t wanted him testifying as such. 
I explained the FEC non-crime in a previous post.  

For those unaware, the NY Prosecution was based on falsifying a business record which is ONLY a felony if it is done to cover up another felony.  The "other felony" that they alleged that it was done to cover up was the Federal Felony of failing to report paying off a bimbo as a campaign expense.  The problem with that is that John Edwards did literally exactly that.  Some of his friends paid off the chick that he had a baby with and the feds unsuccessfully attempted to prosecute him for an FEC violation.  At that point the feds determined that it wasn't a crime so when Trump did it later they didn't bother to attempt to prosecute.  

The NY Prosecutor couldn't prosecute Trump on the Federal crime because that could have been removed to federal court where it belonged and where it would have been dropped based on the Edwards precedent so they dug around and came up with the convoluted theory that recording the payments as a business expense was a falsification in furtherance of the underlying FEC Felony and thus that recording it as a business expense was a felony.  

This whole house of cards falls down if there isn't an FEC violation and there isn't.  Then they made it into 34 felonies with (as I understand it) the bulk of them being separate instances of the exact same thing.  

So here is the thing:
To the anti-Trump camp this is just another reason (that they didn't need) to hate Trump.  To Trump supporters this is just another instance of the swamp trying to get their guy with legal nonsense.  Probably literally nobody switched sides over this.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 50202
  • Liked:
Re: OT-Politics Thread: please TRY to keep it civil, you damned dirty apes
« Reply #46241 on: July 02, 2025, 01:43:39 PM »
The thing that often gets me is the “for thee not for me” energy that often pervades this.

I don’t know that I’m 100 percent on this, but I usually try to say, if this was flipped in terms of parties, how would I feel? And then I try to use that to drill down on the actual act and my feelings on it. (That also requires a good bit of skepticism and distrust of folks I might be aligned with, something that often seems cast aside quickly in such discussions).

I suppose part of politics if getting joy from being mad and consuming nonsense. And a lot of that just leads to it boiling down to “go team” sort of fluff.
ya see why I don't care too much about politics?
luckily, most of this nonsense has very little affect on this poor dirtfarmer

I doubt the Big Beaut Bill will benefit or hurt me much a Tall
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.