Just like all the rioters taking selfies while looting. They even stand over the white peoples they have maimed and take them.
but I doubt you have seen that or give a shit.
there was a great story today near top of CNNs website today about a cop who pushed a peaceful protester. Pictures and all. Of course nothing about the NYC cop that was ambushed and stabbed in the neck by a mostly peaceful protester. Then again- as Fredo on CNN says- no need for the protesters to be peaceful.
then we have “ you ain’t black” candidate, author of what many liberals view as one of the most racist pieces of legislation ever written, the 94 crime bill, in a back church trump to convince people that he cares more. Lol
lots of photo ops going on. I guess if the Prez wants to show he is standing up for law and order- to his credit, he is going against the PC grain and in fact is going solo. Takes guts to against the mob.
You know, making the case against one candidate does not necessarily make the case for the opponent. And that works both ways with Biden and Trump, just as it did with Hillary and Trump. Sometimes you can't make a case for either except that he/she might not be as bad as the other candidate. I think that's how a lot of people felt in 2016, and Hillary repelled more people in the critical swing states than Trump did.
If a president--any president--is going to stand up for law and order and mean it, it means he can't urge cops to go rough on people they arrest, tell his supporters at rallies to rough up any protesters who show up, etc. If it's just law and order when it's politically convenient, because it's
their guys who are out of order, then it doesn't mean all that much.
This whole protest movement has made me realize that I've had somewhat of a double standard in my head. When it's some armed 2nd-Amendment purists standing up for their right to carry their rifles into private businesses, even at the expense of scaring customers away, I've given them the benefit of the doubt. When its leftists shutting down parts of Seattle to protest a meeting of the WTO, I've been all for hitting them with all the force that the law allows, and maybe some more than that. I realize that I've got to get it straight in my head what the standards should be, because they have to apply to both sides, not just "law" for the guys on my side and "order or we'll smash the hell out of you" for the guys on the other side. I do think that in general the protests on the other side push more readily into violence, but some, maybe a lot, of the violence occurring about the edges of this protest movement is coming from "conservatives" who are acting in order to discredit the protesters.