header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness

 (Read 127363 times)

MichiFan87

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 796
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #686 on: April 06, 2019, 12:25:02 AM »
GreenTechMedia's Interchange podcast just had an episode about the future of autonomous / electric vehicles. Unfortunately, they probably won't be mainstream as soon as previously thought, even with Lyft's recent IPO and Uber's upcoming one. It's still a matter of when than if, but regulatory issues and bad press (eg. Uber and Waymo's accidents) don't help. They should proliferate within cities first, though....
“When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing”
― Bo Schembechler

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71156
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #687 on: April 06, 2019, 07:32:44 AM »
The track record for the B-17 hitting moving ships in WW I is apparently one for a whole lot.  Some Japanese destroyer was hit with a bomb from a B-17.  You can't hit a ship from altitude that is at sea except by chance.  Dive bombing was of course far more accurate and the Japanese had a tremendous torpedo that did most of their damage to ships, air or ship/boat delivered.  My Dad was a radar operator on a B-24 in the SW Pacific and he told me they would line up and drop on night shipping at low altitude and the radar would "time" the bomb release.  The Japanese couldn't see them.  They went down in the ocean - reports vary about where - and 3 were later rescued, so I have his Purple Heart now.

They carried guns and gunners who never did anything and once they talked the pilot into attacking a Japanese air strip to strafe.  They did that once.

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #688 on: April 06, 2019, 10:14:57 AM »
The B-24 was the world's most produced bomber, heavy bomber, multi-engine aircraft, and American military aircraft in history.

It was a clumsy airplane, difficult to fly in comparison with its contemporaries.  The "Davis" wing was very efficient, giving it more lift than a B-17 had with less wing area.  But was not effective at high altitude, so the B-24 had a lower ceiling than the B-17.  It also was very adversely affected by icing.

The twin tails contributed to its poor handling, and eventually the thoroughly reworked PB4Y-2 Privateer naval variant had a tall single tail that was a decided improvement.

It's most famous mission was probably Operation Tidal Wave, the Ploesti raid of August 1943.  53 aircraft (out of 177 that took off) and 660 air crewmen were lost. It was the second-worst loss ever suffered by the USAAF on a single mission.

Aircrews preferred the B-17, but the Army, looking at range and bomb-load stats ordered B-24s in huge numbers--18,500 of them were built, including 4,600 made by Ford at its gigantic Willow Run factory.

I imagine it would be pretty hairy strafing an enemy airbase in a B-24.  Or dropping down to bomb ships at night.



A B-24 Liberator called "Sandman" during a bomb run over the Ploiești Astra Romana refinery during Operation Tidal Wave.
« Last Edit: April 06, 2019, 10:20:28 AM by CWSooner »
Play Like a Champion Today

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5498
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #689 on: April 06, 2019, 10:22:21 AM »
I used to spend idle time waiting for my Dad's flight home in the Billy Mitchell gallery of flight at Mitchell Intl Airport in MKE.  He, and his father, have a lot of things with the Mitchell name.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71156
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #690 on: April 06, 2019, 10:32:08 AM »
With radar, my Dad's plane could see enemy ships and they couldn't see the bomber, they still fired into the air.  He told me their standard bomb run was at 500 feet.  They would try to line up with the long portion of the ship using radar and Dad would connect his radar to the bomb release and when a line met another line they would drop 500 lb bombs automatically.

The planes had turbocharger problems also, the night they went down they had to go back because a turbo "ran away" on run up, I'm not sure what that means.  Perhaps the waste gate locked closed, don't know.  He said the planes would take off over loaded every time and reach the end of the run way and the copilot would retract the gear and the plan would sink almost into the ocean.  They went down in the second aircraft.  My Dad had a real struggle getting his Purple Heart because of the records fire and the general war mayhem at the time.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71156
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #691 on: April 06, 2019, 10:32:49 AM »
Incidentally, the Air Force Museum in Dayton, Ohio is the most expansive and complete I've ever seen anywhere.

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #692 on: April 06, 2019, 10:51:23 AM »
Flying at 500 feet at night over water with no visual references in a B-24 strikes me as reasonably hairy even without the bombs and enemy defensive fire figured in.  500 feet is only about 4 1/2 B-24 wingspans (110 feet).  It wouldn't take much of an abrupt maneuver to drop 200-300 feet in altitude.  I wonder what they used to indicate their altitude.  The standard altimeter, with the barometric pressure having been set before takeoff at home base, could have been off by quite a bit hundreds of miles away.  But I don't think they would have had anything else.

Army helicopters--which routinely fly night missions at low levels--have radar altimeters.  I'm pretty sure those did not exist back in WWII.

Those turbo-superchargers were pushing the edge of technology, I think.  I know that P-38s and P-47s had trouble with them.  Probably B-17s did too.

I had an uncle who served in WWII (Navy torpedo-bomber gunner), Korea (Air Force Reserve RB-29 flight engineer) and Vietnam (Air America flight engineer).  All his records were lost in the St. Louis fire.

I'd love to see the Air Force Museum someday.
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71156
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #693 on: April 06, 2019, 11:01:42 AM »
The radar could "see" clouds, according to my Dad.  He said they could tune in a frequency to show where clouds were heaviest.  I imagine they had a radar altimeter at the time.  It would be an easy technology relatively speaking.  They had a mission to Truk he told me about with the "daylight boys".  They took along a "Snooper" to fly them around the worst of the clouds as the distance was at extreme range (I think they were based on New Georgia at the time, but they changed bases over the months.)  The radar plane he said never came home after those raids, he was waiting their turn fatalistically.  Now, some of what my Dad told me is probably somewhat distorted of course.

I know the B-24 had an advanced autopilot which made it preferred in the Pacific, perhaps it was slaved to the radar altimeter?  Maybe I misrecall 500 feet, also possible.


CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #694 on: April 06, 2019, 11:46:27 AM »
Heh!  Checking the Font of All Wisdom and Knowledge, I see that radar altimeters WERE used in WWII, although a quick Google search doesn't turn up anything about their use on B-24s.  Could the flight controls have been slaved to one?--maybe so.

I wasn't doubting the 500' figure.  Just saying that that would have been a bit tense at night.  Flying an AH-64 Apache at 100 feet and 100 knots at night--even with pretty good night vision systems--is tense.  Flying a lumbering B-24 at 200 knots, low level, at night . . . that's not a walk in the park, even without having enemies out there who want to kill you.
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71156
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #695 on: April 06, 2019, 11:50:30 AM »



Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71156
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #696 on: April 06, 2019, 11:51:54 AM »
https://rec.aviation.military.narkive.com/9UiIcrUv/sb-24-snooper-aircraft

The Internet is wonderful.

Both of these squadrons were equipped with the “SB-24″ in October
1943. The initial allotment was ten “SB-24s” for the Solomons and 13
for New Guinea. The “SB-24s” were modified B-24s but I have been
unable to find any information about the number that existed.

What makes these two squadron unique is that they operated
“SB-24s” (an unofficial designation) that were equipped with blind-
flying equipment consisting of the SCR-717 10-centimeter Sea Search
Radar, the SCR-729 Aircraft Radar Beacon (aka “Rebecca IIA”) and a
number of other devices including an absolute altimeter, a radar scope
and a bomb-release mechanism. The mission of both squadrons was for
low level, anti-shipping strikes under the cover of darkness. They had
this capability because the radar-sighting devices permitted operation
of the bomb-release mechanism irrespective of visual sighting of the
target.

Some four-engine SB-24 bombers were equipped with SCR-717 air-to-
surface radars for finding targets at night and AN/APQ-5 low altitude
radars for bomb aiming. Called “Snoopers,” two squadrons of about
forty SB-24s serving with Fifth, and Thirteenth Air Forces claimed to
have sunk 344 enemy ships, barges, and sampans at night, with 62 more
probably destroyed and 446 damaged.

By March 1944, the Japanese ceased sending shipping convoys to the
Solomons area and the 868th Bombardment Squadron was out of a job and
were subsequently used as pathfinders for high-altitude bombers. I
believe the 63d Bombardment Squadron also converted to high level
bombing in 1944.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71156
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #697 on: April 06, 2019, 12:00:57 PM »
absolute altimeter

an aircraft altimeter that determines distance to the earth by radio measuring the time needed for an emitted wave to reach the earth and reflect back to the aircraft



CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #698 on: April 06, 2019, 04:12:04 PM »
And there you have it.

Learn something new every day.

The B-24 article in the Font of All Wisdom and Knowledge mentions the SB-24 once to say that it operated against enemy shipping.  No information about its equipment, or whether this was a field modification or what.

One of the five plants that build B-24s was one at the Tulsa airport, a factory that the federal government been built using Reconstruction Finance Corporation funds and then leased to Douglas Aircraft.  Douglas built just under 1,000 of them there.

The final Douglas-Tulsa B-24 built was a B-24J-10-DT, S/N 42-51430.  It was paid for by the Douglas workers there, by subscription, I believe.  It was named the "Tulsamerican," and received its nose art there at the factory.  It rolled off the assembly line on 31 July 1944, and crash-landed in the Adriatic Sea returning from a bombing mission on 17 December of that year.  Seven of the 10 crewmen were rescued.  Here's an article about a NOVA episode featuring the effort to research the crash site and recover any remains or artifacts of the missing crew members.



The nose art would not cut it today, of course.
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71156
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: 2019 Offseason Stream of Unconsciousness
« Reply #699 on: April 07, 2019, 08:35:48 AM »
It wasn't a field mod.  My Dad's compartment was down near the front of the bombay, he said it was a tough crawl to get there.  He had to roll down the radar dome which replaced the belly turret by hand crank, and it took some time, and was done after they were at altitude because of the drag.  He said the dome was very heavy, and his guess is when the plane hit the water the dome tore the fuselage in half and he floated out.  He was largely unconscious through the night and the flight lieutenant kept him and the copilot afloat until they were rescued by a US destroyer.  He really admired the Flight Lieutenant who he mentioned often, an Isadore Lamica from NY state.  He was later killed in the war.

The radar was a separate compartment and slaved to the bomb "sight".  It sounds to me like a pretty significant mod, probably done at Langley.  My Dad's first missions were against German U Boats using B-18s equipped with radar.  He flew B-25s a few times there in Virginia, and he commented about how they were like fighters compared with heavy bombers.

I met the copilot once when I was a kid, his forehead sloped back very oddly because he went through the wind shield and apparently Lamica who was not badly hurt followed him on impact.  Those three were the only survivors in the crew.  They were in the ocean all night in effect, my Dad drifting in and out of consciousness.  The official records claim the plane went down shortly after takeoff, but my Dad contends they were aloft because he had rolled the dome down into position and that would have been at least 30 minutes out.

My Dad had been a radioman and had been selected for OCS when he was diverted to something they wouldn't tell him about, radar school.  The crew was supposed to shoot him if they were about to be captured by the Japanese, though my Dad said he really didn't know much of anything that would benefit the Japanese.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.