header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Down
Author

Topic: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame

 (Read 1282 times)

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 3336
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #42 on: October 18, 2026, 10:34:16 AM »
No running game and a high-priced QB who went 6-16 for 66 yards. That is a trash offense.
Logged

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38157
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #43 on: October 18, 2026, 11:27:14 AM »
CoJo ain't it.

It's Hopkins or Adams time.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 3336
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #44 on: October 18, 2026, 11:36:57 AM »
The USC game will be interesting. SC seems to struggle with travel to the Midwest, but they are coming off their bye week. The Badgers just did that and looked like ass heading to LA. I think that game will be close. How close is an interesting question.
Logged

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 3336
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #45 on: October 18, 2026, 11:40:20 AM »
On the plus side, no turnovers? 
~???
Logged

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38157
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #46 on: October 19, 2026, 07:59:33 AM »
Competent officials would be nice.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 57342
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #47 on: October 19, 2026, 08:05:23 AM »
too much to ask
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38157
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #48 on: October 19, 2026, 09:00:28 AM »
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 3336
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #49 on: October 19, 2026, 11:12:04 AM »
referees did Wisconsin no favors, but Wisconsin's offense simply wasn't good enough.

Similarly, neither was the 3rd down defense. Which surprised me.
Logged

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38157
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #50 on: October 19, 2026, 11:24:45 AM »
Mike Tressel got caught with his pants down. He should have brought the heat and he didn't. Of course, neither he nor anyone else expected that Cal-Poly bum transfer QB to perform the way he did. 

UCLA might actually be better with him over Nico.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38157
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #51 on: October 19, 2026, 02:48:35 PM »
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38157
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #52 on: Today at 07:04:22 AM »
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 3336
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #53 on: Today at 01:12:22 PM »
I'm all for sending plays in, and I agree that WI got some bad breaks here, but...

SIX FOR SIXTEEN FOR SIXTY-SIX YARDS.

UCLA: 13 for 20 on 3rd down.

Suck it up, buttercup. The Badgers lost because their quarterback can't make the throws, and their defense couldn't get off the field. This isn't a one-time thing: Wisconsin's offense has been bad for (checks notes) three and half seasons.* I wonder what else has been going on for 3-1/2 seasons?


*Wisconsin's offense sucked in '21 and '22, also. '20, too, but I generally ignore the Covid season.
Logged

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38157
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #54 on: Today at 01:18:18 PM »
The offense can't stay on the field. That does not help out any defense.

This guy is a UCLA writer, by the way.


https://twitter.com/daviddavidwoods/status/2112290595398136086
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 38157
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin (4-2, 2-1) at #12 UCLA (6-0, 4-0) Postgame
« Reply #55 on: Today at 01:19:20 PM »
The running backs got a total of 13 touches. Can't have that shit.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
CFB51 Subscription
Subscribe

Dock Signs-WeatherPROOF