I surmise everyone understands we have bits and pieces out there, we still have not addressed the KEY question, what do we get for the money?
Cost:benefit. That would be part of any real "plan". All those bits and pieces, as I've shown, amount to diddley if the goal is to slow climate change significantly, diddley, an unmeasurable amount. Even if Europe does the same, it's an unmeasurably small benefit. Even if China gets on board and stops building coal plants, it's a small impact on a large problem.
Now, maybe the effort it worth it, some small benefit, perhaps, but I'd like to see the calculations. All the one's I've seen show benefits that are simply too small to matter, at all, but curiously those are published by folks like Lonborg who have a dog in the fight, so I don't believe him.
But everything I can find clearly shows we can't do much, now, about the problem in any practical sense, rearrange some deck chairs into a more holistic pattern.
So, if we DO all the bits and pieces, what do the models suggest will be the benefit? Answer? Very very little.