header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 652241 times)

Wildcat4E

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 219
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5488 on: March 12, 2026, 04:36:01 PM »
Even in 1970, the "good" QBs had a 1:1 TD:INT ratio, and led their teams to a good record.  They'd have a 55-60% comp rate and/or would be a rushing threat with a few hundred yards on the ground.  "Field General" stuff.

This guy didn't do any of that.  At all.  But he was 10th in Heisman voting?  There's no argument for that.  None.
Dude had to be the 2nd coming to take K-State of 1970 to a winning record.  I don't know much, except I was in utero at the time, I'm told.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.