header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 292157 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82503
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3738 on: April 21, 2025, 12:17:57 PM »



utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3739 on: April 21, 2025, 12:24:13 PM »
golderned vandy

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82503
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3740 on: April 21, 2025, 01:20:32 PM »

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82503
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3741 on: April 22, 2025, 10:14:12 AM »



MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3742 on: April 22, 2025, 11:52:28 AM »


West Virginia is so obese they don't even get a number.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3743 on: April 22, 2025, 11:53:14 AM »
West Virginia is so obese they don't even get a number. 
Those mountain mamas birth 'em BIG.

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3744 on: April 22, 2025, 11:55:18 AM »
Those mountain mamas birth 'em BIG.

And here I thought everything was bigger in TEXAS.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31046
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3745 on: April 22, 2025, 12:03:24 PM »
West Virginia is so obese they don't even get a number. 
40.6%
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3746 on: April 22, 2025, 12:06:40 PM »
And unsurprisingly, the map for the popularity of diabetes juice aka sweet tea has a strong correlation to the map for obesity...

But man, good for California and Florida.  Everyone should move there!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31046
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3747 on: April 22, 2025, 12:09:56 PM »
And unsurprisingly, the map for the popularity of diabetes juice aka sweet tea has a strong correlation to the map for obesity...

But man, good for California and Florida.  Everyone should move there!
California ranks higher in taxes than we do.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14495
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3748 on: April 22, 2025, 12:16:02 PM »
I still don't understand how Colorado is such an outlier. 

I mean, everyone in Colorado seems to love the mountains and outdoors... But why would that be different than Utah, or Wyoming, or Idaho?

Doesn't make a ton of sense to me. I'm sure there's a good explanation; I just don't know what it is.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3749 on: April 22, 2025, 12:17:59 PM »
I still don't understand how Colorado is such an outlier.

I mean, everyone in Colorado seems to love the mountains and outdoors... But why would that be different than Utah, or Wyoming, or Idaho?

Doesn't make a ton of sense to me. I'm sure there's a good explanation; I just don't know what it is.
Plus they all smoke so much weed, you'd figure the munchies rate would be pretty high...

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82503
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3750 on: April 22, 2025, 12:44:19 PM »
States with large urban populations trend to being less obese.

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3751 on: April 22, 2025, 12:47:21 PM »
I still don't understand how Colorado is such an outlier.

I mean, everyone in Colorado seems to love the mountains and outdoors... But why would that be different than Utah, or Wyoming, or Idaho?

Doesn't make a ton of sense to me. I'm sure there's a good explanation; I just don't know what it is.

My best guess is some kind of correlation between left-leaners and better diets.  Utah, Wyoming, and Idaho have more right-leaning populations, and in my anecdotal experience, the hippie-libs tend to have more focus on diet and superior restraint in that department.  My father-in-law and his wife live in Colorado, and they definitely fit that bill. 

This is based on zero evidence or research whatsoever, and correlation is not necessarily causation.  As CD pointed out, there's the cities vs. rural thing, and that also corresponds to left and right-leaners.  Multi-collinearity, we call that in nerd stats.  

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.