header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 291238 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3598 on: February 26, 2025, 06:51:55 PM »

This is the map they should have on election nights, just so people have some kind of forced context.  It will open a lot of ignorant eyes.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12076
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3599 on: February 26, 2025, 07:39:22 PM »
I'm not denigrating ANY of the inventions you brought up from the prior era. They're all massive.

You were the one who seemed to be minimized the stuff post-1950 as just "computer stuff" like it's all trivial in comparison. I was just defending them.
I mean you said cell phones were the biggest thing, but that's just an upgrade of the telephone, which was already invented. 

You could drop just about anyone into the 50s, and they'd get by okay. Anything before that, they'd be pretty screwed.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14495
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3600 on: February 26, 2025, 08:03:52 PM »
I mean you said cell phones were the biggest thing, but that's just an upgrade of the telephone, which was already invented.

You could drop just about anyone into the 50s, and they'd get by okay. Anything before that, they'd be pretty screwed.
I didn't say cell phones were the "biggest" thing. IMHO possibly the biggest of that entire list was the transistor. But I'd also argue cell phones are a little bit more than just an upgrade of the telephone. 

But I disagree with the second point. I think to a large extent, you could take anyone between 1950 and 1995 and *mostly* they'd be able to slot in to each other's world. But I think the difference between 1995 and 2025 is an absolutely insane gap compared to the difference between 1950 and 1995. 

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21765
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3601 on: February 26, 2025, 08:08:51 PM »
Mandatory seat belts.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45432
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3602 on: February 26, 2025, 11:44:52 PM »
helmet laws
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3603 on: February 27, 2025, 07:51:04 AM »
I was interested in seeing MRI on the list.  I'm not disputing it, I just would not have thought of it.  It's a much older technique used in chemistry since the 60s pretty widely, but only for samples in small tubes, not whole body parts.  That technique was called "NMR", for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, they changed the name to get rid of the nuclear term, so folks wouldn't confuse it with Xrays I guess or get upset that it was nuclear radiation.


FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45432
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3604 on: February 27, 2025, 09:47:03 AM »
get upset that it was nuclear radiation.

people don't know what an Xray is
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3605 on: February 27, 2025, 09:50:32 AM »
The word "nuclear" just sounds bad, to folks, for whatever reason, like "nuclear family" must be one that is radioactive I guess.

We're all exposed to electromagnetic radiation daily .... sometimes at dangerous levels.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45432
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3606 on: February 27, 2025, 10:03:52 AM »
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31042
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3607 on: February 27, 2025, 10:35:08 AM »
Probably 2004 USC or 2001 Miami.

No OSU in the list? 2002, 2014 and 2024 not good enough?

Seems like an oversight to me.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3608 on: February 27, 2025, 11:18:19 AM »


I bet few would guess accurately who is Number Two.

I have been through the top nine interestingly, or not.  And 11, 13, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20.

I thought Haneda was quite nice but there was a lot of walking after a long flight.  CDG is my least favorite.
« Last Edit: February 27, 2025, 11:26:24 AM by Cincydawg »

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22169
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3609 on: February 27, 2025, 11:24:22 AM »
I've been through all of the American ones plus Heathrow, CDG, and Amsterdam.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31042
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3610 on: February 27, 2025, 11:30:22 AM »
I've been through all of the American ones plus Heathrow, CDG, and Amsterdam.
Sub Frankfort for CDG and this is me.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14495
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #3611 on: February 27, 2025, 11:47:57 AM »

I bet few would guess accurately who is Number Two.
I wouldn't have guessed, but it's not surprising. If you look at a map, it's basically right in the middle of a lot of routes between Europe, Africa, China, India, and Southeast Asia. Dubai is a major financial center of the ME. And Dubai has got so much $%&#!@ money that they can build the biggest, ritziest airport they want to in order to attract flyers/airlines to come through. 

So it makes sense, even if I might not have guessed. 

I've been through all of the American ones plus Heathrow, CDG, and Amsterdam.

Same, minus Amsterdam. 

The other question I'd ask everyone here... What is the most notable OMISSION to you on this list... The airport that you'd think would be there, but isn't. 

For me, it's probably Hong Kong... I've flown through there several times and it's always seemed like a major hub, as well as being a big financial center for Asia and just over the [former?] border with Shenzhen, a major industrial city. I wonder if maybe it used to be on this list, but flyers have been routing around it after some of the things China has done to HK over the last few years? 

Runner up for me might be Shanghai... Also a major city (both industrial and financial), probably very much a gateway for westerners to the rest of China and a gateway for Chinese out of China... Looking at pictures of Shanghai from say the 1990s to today I thought it might be on this list. 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.