header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 153   Go Down
Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 84809 times)

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14386
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #896 on: August 19, 2023, 11:08:28 AM »
Quote from: Cincydawg on August 19, 2023, 10:55:48 AM
College football's top 100 players for 2023 - ESPN
College football's top 100 players for 2023 - ESPN

More click bait, don't bother.  It's an OK list, I guess, but some of these players of course will fail to shine and others will.
list has it's issues- as will every list like this...but it's 10x better than that garbage 247 tried to shit out lol. 
Logged

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #897 on: August 19, 2023, 09:06:08 PM »
May be an image of football and text
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72196
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #898 on: August 20, 2023, 07:07:42 AM »
That list seems pretty reasonable to me, at first blush.

Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72196
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #899 on: August 20, 2023, 08:02:50 AM »
45+ Worst Colleges and Universities in America Ranked – avocadoposts

I was surprised to see Texas and Wisconsin on this list.  But lists often are click bait.  Duh.

Logged

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #900 on: August 20, 2023, 11:32:58 AM »
Lulz

"Texas College"

I've never even heard of it.
Logged

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11253
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #901 on: August 21, 2023, 07:50:06 PM »
Logged
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72196
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #902 on: August 22, 2023, 08:04:39 AM »
They even have MLB "rankings" now.  OK then.  Standings, sure, but rankings?

"We" want everything ranked.
Logged

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25504
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #903 on: August 22, 2023, 08:18:53 AM »
Quote from: Brutus Buckeye on August 21, 2023, 07:50:06 PM

I'd put Tenn and UGA on there before Tenn and KY. And no ND? Hmmm.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72196
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #904 on: August 22, 2023, 08:22:38 AM »
Yeah, UGA-UF should be ahead of Auburn, and South Carolina shouldn't be there at all.  I guess you reeally run out after about 15.  Whatever.
Logged

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #905 on: August 22, 2023, 08:52:07 AM »
Quote from: 847badgerfan on August 22, 2023, 08:18:53 AM
I'd put Tenn and UGA on there before Tenn and KY. And no ND? Hmmm.
what border state school do they play regularly?
Michigan St?
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25504
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #906 on: August 22, 2023, 09:01:37 AM »
MSU was more often than M, but now that they have to play all of those ACC games, the ones against the B1G schools waned.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #907 on: August 22, 2023, 09:05:48 AM »
yup, this is what folks that want rotating schedules in 18-team conferences don't understand

killing of rivalries
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14386
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #908 on: August 22, 2023, 09:06:47 AM »
Pitt-WVU has no business being on any list....sorry. 

UGA-UF should be #3....why is that behind UGA-Auburn? Da fk?

BAMA-Tenn was a really good rivalry until Tennessee went into the freaking tank and sucked ass for eons. Maybe it's coming back? 
Logged

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #909 on: August 22, 2023, 09:08:16 AM »
Quote from: 847badgerfan on August 22, 2023, 09:01:37 AM
MSU was more often than M, but now that they have to play all of those ACC games, the ones against the B1G schools waned.

Yeah I've never really thought of MSU-ND as a rivalry although they're met 79 times.

UM-ND seems like more of one, but they've only played something like 43 times.  And it seems like most of the really good rivalries formed much of their lore during the "Golden Era" of college football in the 40s, 50s, 60s, and 70s, but Michigan and ND only played 4 times in those entire 4 decades
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 63 64 [65] 66 67 ... 153   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
WeatherPROOF Sign Two Sided

WeatherPROOF Sign Single Sided