header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 626718 times)

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 16460
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5446 on: Today at 10:47:48 AM »
Just pop the top and doors off, loading gear is easy peasey. :)
Yeah, that is a lot of it. But we're in the time of year that it's a little less possible to drive around with the top down. Supposed to rain much of the rest of the week. 

A lot of people with convertibles are probably thinking, "well, the top and windows can't be that hard... I just press a button and my top goes down and up..." Nope, it's a manual wrestling match with that damn thing--especially the windows... when it comes time to put the top up. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 88682
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5447 on: Today at 11:44:30 AM »
Is there a hybrid Santa Fe available?  Mild H.  Good mpgs around town.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 16460
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5448 on: Today at 11:52:12 AM »
Is there a hybrid Santa Fe available?  Mild H.  Good mpgs around town.
MPG isn't a big enough factor for me to swing a vehicle purchase. 

As mentioned in my discussion about electric, I felt comfortable with a slow charger because a "heavy" week of driving might end up being 200-250 miles, and that's only once my oldest leaves for college so about 7 days a month I'd have to handle both school dropoff and pickup. The rest of my driving is pretty miniscule. If all I'm doing is going to work 3 days a week, Costco, etc I probably will be closer to 100 mi/wk. 

With the Flex, I would generally be filling up every two weeks on my Costco run, but a lot of the time I was filling up while being between 1/4 and 3/8 tank or so... 


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 88682
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5449 on: Today at 11:59:24 AM »
We drive about 6,000 miles a year, so about the same.  In our case, my wife wanted better acceleration, and the hybrid has more hp.  I think it was about $2 K extra.

That was my main motivation.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 16460
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5450 on: Today at 12:09:31 PM »
We drive about 6,000 miles a year, so about the same.  In our case, my wife wanted better acceleration, and the hybrid has more hp.  I think it was about $2 K extra.

That was my main motivation.
When I test drove the Santa Fe, that would have probably pushed me to the hybrid as well. 

Oddly the Santa Fe has lower total horsepower in the hybrid configuration, but apparently the hybrid makes it better acceleration when you need it...

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 88682
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5451 on: Today at 12:24:13 PM »

The 2026 Hyundai Santa Fe features a standard 2.5-liter turbocharged engine producing 277 horsepower and 311 lb-ft of torque, paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission. A 1.6-liter turbocharged hybrid powertrain is also available, generating a combined 231 horsepower and 271 lb-ft of torque. 
The 2025-2026 Hyundai Santa Fe with the 2.5-liter turbocharged engine typically achieves a 0-60 mph time of around 6.3 to 7.0 seconds. The more fuel-efficient Hybrid models are slower, recording 0-60 mph times between 7.9 and 9.8 seconds depending on the specific model and testing conditions. 


Interesting, I didn't know that.  The Tucson Hybrid has the latter drive train, but the nonhybrid is quite a bit slower.  The SF is the reverse, though throttle response off idle could favor the hybrid, I don't know.  The Tucson 0-60 time is about 7.1 seconds vs 8.5 for the nonhybrid.  In your case, the regular seems a better option of course.








betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 16460
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5452 on: Today at 12:30:24 PM »
The RDX looks to be around 6.5s to 60. 

Honestly I'm not that worried about it. The Flex was about 8 seconds, and I lived with that. So getting to the mid 6's is an upgrade. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 88682
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #5453 on: Today at 12:41:11 PM »
I personally like being around 7 seconds (or less), but as you note, I have owned vehicles that were 14 seconds or longer.  It's not a major deal, in the later 1970s 7 seconds would be top of the heap, and many cars were well over 10.  My wife is more attuned to it than I am, she's had some pretty fast cars in the past.  I've obviously had rental cars that were 9-10 seconds and it's manageable.  For us, it was a factor.

It's nice to have a car that can GO when you need it.  I also think it puts less strain on the drivetrain if you are not needing to ask much of its capability often.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.