header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?

 (Read 11104 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17665
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #154 on: October 10, 2019, 01:33:02 PM »
is that not what we've always done?
Well it's certainly what Alabama has always done, so I can see why you might be confused. :)

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2990
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #155 on: October 10, 2019, 02:02:30 PM »
Actually, I claim 2011 too.  So we're up to 5 now.

Woohoo!  5-time NCs, bay-beeee!!!!!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37498
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #156 on: October 10, 2019, 02:03:59 PM »
you just caught Nebraska
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12176
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #157 on: October 10, 2019, 03:00:45 PM »
I claim 1969 for Purdue's M*NC. 

Moon national championship :)

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2990
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #158 on: October 10, 2019, 03:21:38 PM »

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #159 on: October 10, 2019, 03:49:44 PM »
I always razz my wife about this (Lake Forest alum).  What could have been.      I don't think she knows they were a part of all of this.  All those tennis matches she played in, she could've been a B1G champion.
The most impactful decision made in the early days of this league was the replacement of Lake Forest with Michigan in between the first discussion meeting and the charter meeting.  

The charter members were:
  • Chicago
  • Northwestern
  • Illinois
  • Purdue
  • Wisconsin
  • Michigan
  • Minnesota

I break that down as:
  • Two private Chicago-area schools (Chicago, Northwestern)
  • Three large public schools geographically close to Chicago (Illinois is same state and 135 mi from downtown Chicago, Purdue is 124 mi from downtown Chicago, Wisconsin is 147 mi from downtown Chicago)
  • Two large public schools a bit further from Chicago (Michigan, Minnesota, 240 and 406 mi from downtown Chicago)


If the conference had been chartered with Lake Forest instead of Michigan it would have had a very different balance.  Nearly half of the members would have been private Chicago-area schools and all but one would have been within 150 miles of downtown Chicago.  In that case I think it is likely that the conference would have developed as mostly a local, Chicago-area conference instead of the regional conference that it became.  Instead of adding Indiana and Iowa in 1899 and Ohio State in 1912 it seems more likely to me that a more Chicago-centric conference with Lake Forest instead of Michigan would have been more likely to add other Chicago-area private schools.  

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #160 on: October 10, 2019, 06:58:26 PM »
I'll go ahead and claim 1915 as a championship year for Oklahoma.  Richard Billingsley says so, and who am I to argue with him?

OU was also co-champs of the Southwest Conference that year, with an old-school-SEC-like 2-0 conference record.
Play Like a Champion Today

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17126
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #161 on: October 10, 2019, 08:07:07 PM »
Most of youse Bastages claiming unrecognized MNC'c prolly have a few Fulmer Cups to go with them :cool2:
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18839
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #162 on: October 10, 2019, 08:26:36 PM »
I love LOVE that Ole Miss class of multiple 5* kids coming from out of nowhere was shown to be what it had to be all along.  No "what ifs" about it.



It was like a chubby midget winning the 100m dash gold medal at the Olympics......uhh, sorry, yeah, you're on something.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17665
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #163 on: October 11, 2019, 07:47:17 AM »
Most of youse Bastages claiming unrecognized MNC'c prolly have a few Fulmer Cups to go with them :cool2:

My opinion on claimed NCs has always been, if the NC was awarded to the team immediately after the season (or after the bowls once the wire services began doing that in the late 60s/early 70s), then you claim it.  If it's from some retroactive system that just began mathematical analysis and decided to recognize various different national champion teams from years long past, then you don't.  In an effort to "fit in" with the SEC, the Aggies just recently decided to recognize such retroactive titles from 1927 and 1919.  Not a single player from either of those two teams was alive when these national championships were "awarded" to them.  In my opinion, they are not legitimate.

However, arguing about stupid stuff like that is part of the unique, wacky craziness that is College Football.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25184
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #164 on: October 11, 2019, 09:12:27 AM »
If the conference had been chartered with Lake Forest instead of Michigan it would have had a very different balance.  Nearly half of the members would have been private Chicago-area schools and all but one would have been within 150 miles of downtown Chicago.  In that case I think it is likely that the conference would have developed as mostly a local, Chicago-area conference instead of the regional conference that it became.  Instead of adding Indiana and Iowa in 1899 and Ohio State in 1912 it seems more likely to me that a more Chicago-centric conference with Lake Forest instead of Michigan would have been more likely to add other Chicago-area private schools. 
Marquette probably would have been considered, and Notre Dame too.

I'm sure the other six in the room were wondering what LF could have brought to the table. You had 6 schools, all with AAU in their future (UW and UC were founding members* of that, in 1900). PhD powerhouses, versus a small liberal arts school with no research goals. There was zero fit.


This invitation is extended to the University of California, The University of Chicago, Clark University, Columbia University, Cornell University, Harvard University, Johns Hopkins University, University of Michigan, University of Pennsylvania, Princeton University, Leland Stanford Junior University, University of Wisconsin, and Yale University.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17665
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #165 on: October 11, 2019, 09:14:10 AM »
Marquette probably would have been considered, and Notre Dame too.

I'm sure the other six in the room were wondering what LF could have brought to the table. You had 6 schools, all with AAU in their future (UW and UC were founding members* of that, in 1900). PhD powerhouses, versus a small liberal arts school with no research goals. There was zero fit.


* This invitation is extended to the University of California, The University of Chicago, Clark University, Columbia University, Cornell University, Harvard University, Johns Hopkins University, University of Michigan, University of Pennsylvania, Princeton University, Leland Stanford Junior University, University of Wisconsin, and Yale University.

Don't forget Texas' standing invite to the B1G/CIC. ;)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25184
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #166 on: October 11, 2019, 09:36:24 AM »
That ship has probably sailed, unless UT and OU would leave their other 8 partners in the dust. I suppose there might be room for Kansas, if another certain member were kicked out (or voluntarily left - please!!). 

But, Kansas has a lot of dirt under its fingernails right now, in their only athletic program of value.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17665
  • Liked:
Re: Is the Big Ten top to bottom the 2nd best conference in America?
« Reply #167 on: October 11, 2019, 09:46:17 AM »
That ship has probably sailed, unless UT and OU would leave their other 8 partners in the dust. I suppose there might be room for Kansas, if another certain member were kicked out (or voluntarily left - please!!).

But, Kansas has a lot of dirt under its fingernails right now, in their only athletic program of value.

The market forces that drove realignment in 2010 and 2011 are changing dramatically.  I don't really see any other major schools making moves at this point, there's not really any impetus to do so. It was a fun dream, though!

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.