The suggestion is that the non-profit, that paid a relatively small bail in every one of the cases cited in that article, somehow created the risk to the community is false. The judge set a small bail, which--again--presumed the relative danger of the accused, determined that person was appropriate for release, and set a cash amount designed to deter flight from the process. So the "threat" was determined by the judge, not the non-profit.
I'm not entirely sure why you introduced race into this. Nonetheless, there is lots of evidence that the criminal justice system acts in disproportionate ways against racial minorities. Acting in ways designed to try to reduce that racial bias does not make someone (or an organization) a racist.
This concept that focusing on race makes someone racist is absurd in a society in which racism has been not only widespread, but had full-throated government endorsement for literally hundreds of years. One cannot flip a switch and make that kind of institutional memory disappear. The only way to combat it is to address it. How to best combat racism and its lasting impact on our society raises all kinds of interesting and worthy conversations, but wishing it away is naive.