header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)

 (Read 33831 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18803
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #560 on: April 17, 2020, 12:10:04 PM »
100% of the lakes contained entirely within Ohio are man made.

The quality of life would certainly take a pretty big hit if they got rid of all the dams.
This is exactly my point. 
People wouldn't live where there wasn't water.  So we want to spread out and we make the water sit where we want it.  It's precisely what I've been saying.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12140
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #561 on: April 17, 2020, 12:27:58 PM »
Wait, all rivers don't look like this?


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25066
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #562 on: April 17, 2020, 12:52:44 PM »
This is exactly my point.
People wouldn't live where there wasn't water.  So we want to spread out and we make the water sit where we want it.  It's precisely what I've been saying.
?? 

Precisely where?
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37407
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #563 on: April 17, 2020, 01:02:50 PM »
Wait, all rivers don't look like this?


Greased Lightning!


Go Greased Lightning: Grease Cars Driven by John Travolta, The ...
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #564 on: April 17, 2020, 01:21:09 PM »
I don't recall saying people were better and smarter back then.  But they paid attention to nature, because they had to.  Nowadays, we think we can dictate everything, so we build anywhere we want and include infrastructure that works 99% of the time, but we bail out that 1%. 
Back when people were at the mercy of nature far more than 1% of the time, they acted as such.
That's all.  No cartoons necessary.
You related to George Tirebiter?
Play Like a Champion Today

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #565 on: April 17, 2020, 01:24:06 PM »
100% of the lakes contained entirely within Ohio are man made.

The quality of life would certainly take a pretty big hit if they got rid of all the dams.
Oklahoma's the same way.  We claim more miles of shoreline than any other state or something of the sort.  Whatever we claim, it's all shoreline on man-made lakes.
Play Like a Champion Today

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71187
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #566 on: April 17, 2020, 01:25:27 PM »
It certainly is not true in the US that anyone can build anywhere they might want to, and hasn't been for a long time.

Where I live, no new building can be over 4 stories.  Our building is because it got in before that zoning ordinance existed.

That's nice for us as we're on the top floors.

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11231
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #567 on: April 17, 2020, 02:58:44 PM »
Yeah, you can't build on BLM land, Indian reservations, National Parks/Monuments, etc. Which is like 90% of the Mountain Time Zone. 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18803
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #568 on: April 17, 2020, 03:21:10 PM »
Now you're just trolling.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25066
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #569 on: April 17, 2020, 03:25:39 PM »
Oklahoma's the same way.  We claim more miles of shoreline than any other state or something of the sort.  Whatever we claim, it's all shoreline on man-made lakes.
Michigan and Wisconsin have a lot of shoreline. I don't know about the number Michigan's inland lakes, but they have 3000 miles of Great Lakes shoreline. Wisconsin has 800 miles (2nd of all states) and over 14,000 inland lakes. I'd like to know how much shoreline OK claims.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17106
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #570 on: April 17, 2020, 03:38:23 PM »
 I'd like to know how much shoreline OK claims.
Enough to have noodling contests and cook offs
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

rolltidefan

  • Global Moderator
  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2219
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #571 on: April 17, 2020, 03:40:56 PM »
i'd guess alaska has the most, by a long shot. not only do they dwarf others in coastal shoreline, but they have more lakes than the rest of the us combined. estimated 3 million lakes of 20 arces and larger.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25066
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #572 on: April 17, 2020, 03:44:06 PM »
We're talking about fresh water shoreline (lakes).

I did not know Alaska had that many inland lakes.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

CWSooner

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6045
  • Liked:
Re: Government Policy and Budget Discussion Thread (no politics)
« Reply #573 on: April 17, 2020, 03:47:59 PM »
Michigan and Wisconsin have a lot of shoreline. I don't know about the number Michigan's inland lakes, but they have 3000 miles of Great Lakes shoreline. Wisconsin has 800 miles (2nd of all states) and over 14,000 inland lakes. I'd like to know how much shoreline OK claims.
Here's what a quick Google search revealed.
From the Daily Oklahoman's archives: Oklahoma has 11,611 miles of shoreline, more than the combined non-tidal coasts of the Atlantic and the Gulf of Mexico.
And this:

From 405 Magazine:

The Claim: Oklahoma has more shoreline than any other state.

Source: USA Fact File: usacitiesonline.com/usafactfile.htm
Fact Check: This may be the most frequently repeated myth about Oklahoma. Although the state is one of 20 that have no shoreline on either an ocean or one of the Great Lakes, the claim keeps circulating because of the lack of a single national database that totals all types of shoreline, and differences of opinion on what counts as shoreline and how it is measured.
According to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the state with the most shoreline is Alaska, with 33,904 miles. Second place is Florida, with 8,436 miles of coastline. Third is Louisiana’s 7,721 miles.
The Oklahoma argument for claiming more shoreline than any other state is along these lines: Sure, we have no ocean or Great Lakes frontage, but we have a lot of lakeshore!
The Oklahoma Water Resources Board notes that Oklahoma has approximately 3,000 lakes and ponds 10 acres or more in size, including more than 200 man-made lakes. The OWRB lists 55,646 miles of shoreline along lakes and ponds. (Even within the state, there is disagreement on the numbers; the Oklahoma Department of Wildlife Conservation claims the state has 11,600 miles of shoreline.)
A major flaw in this argument is that it does not take into account that every other state also has interior lakes. Minnesota, for example, counts 11,842 lakes sized 10 acres or larger, compared to Oklahoma’s 3,000. And according to the Alaska Department of Fish and Game, Alaska has 3 million lakes of 5 acres or more, many of them seasonal snowmelt.

And so forth . . . .


Play Like a Champion Today

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.