Yeah, sorry typo.
There's a reason Chip Kelly is trash now. He was never a particularly brilliant offensive mind, he just knew how to exploit efficiencies. Good for him. Once everyone did it, it turned out he wasn't particularly clever.
It's been IMO, the biggest downside to analytics in all sports (at least football, basketball and baseball). It's led to monolithic thinking, and a product that is not visually appealing. You know what is the most efficient football? Running to the line, standing there, and running one of like 4 plays. The most efficient basketball? Just jacking up threes, not within any sort of offensive flow? Baseball? The strikeout aversion made no sense. Just swing for the fences, and who cares if you strike out. Every AB is a HR, strike out or walk.
I'm not questioning that the methods are the most efficient. But the diversity in the sports has unquestionably declined, and from a viewer standpoint, to me, it seems like the most "efficient" strategies, are the least watchable.
For football, I don't want 3 yards and a cloud of dust. But I don't know how watching 22 guys staring at the sidelines for 30 seconds, just to throw a slant route to the slot receiver lined up on a LB is any better. I would much prefer to watch the booth analyze the previous play while the coordinators match wits behind the scenes. I'm sure young people love it, causal fans love it. It's high scoring, defenses are neutered, but football has fallen clearly to #3 for me in my favorite sport rankings.