This OSU team is fascinating to get a handle on.
They lost three top players from last year's team, plus one of the top young guys quit midseason. The replacements were fine, but nothing super notable. They were preseason No. 23, No. 10 in KenPom. So you expect good, not great.
They scuffle out of the gate, start conference play 5-4. Defense isn't good. Not much size. Offensive ability is there. They beat Illinois on the road, lose to Purdue at home. They were as low as No. 24 in KenPom at one point, but were 18 after that loss.
Then they beat Wisconsin to kick off winning seven in a row, including a shootout with Iowa, and rise to 6 in KenPom, No. 4 in the AP poll (polls are dumb). And then one bad loss, two toss-up type games against top-10 teams and Iowa where they rally after halftime but then lose the rope.
And in the end, you have a sort of flawed team (that defense) that is for the most part better than expected, and maybe better than the players it has, but after zenith landed with a thud. Like in the preseason, if I told OSU fans they'd be borderline top-10, great offense, top 2-3 seed, fifth in the conference, they'd take it. And if I told them that on Jan 20 they'd take it (maybe as late as right before the Iowa game?). But because of the timing, it feels just much worse.
But, of course, this sport has the tournament that will leave a taste in your mouth about the team for the next few years. So that's where a lot of the final impression is made.
(I'm reminded of Wisconsin teams that would start 5-0 and then catch OSU. Like the challenge of OSU wasn't different, but it felt different at 5-0 when they lost)