Now Steele and Fiutek both have Michigan winning the Big East.
So if OSU wins then Day should be a shoo in for coach of the year, having exceeded expectations, right?
Or would Kirk Ferentz edge him out by earning another contract extension?
Heh, the only shoo-in is Lovie winning 10 games. Anything else and you have to wait and see.
This is one of the rare years when OSU could have a coach of the year. First-year guy, new QB, losing a top rusher and a bunch of receivers. He wins all his games, he'll have a chance. Maybe could happen at 11-1, but would need everything to break his way.
The other contenders would be any West team that does surprisingly well (UW winning 10 games with an OSU/or Mich win, 10-plus wins from many of those other teams, Maryland/IU winning eight, Rutgers winning seven, MSU might have a puncher's chance at 10-2). You'd need a year like last year, or that year Kill won, where there just didn't feel like a great candidate. OSU probably should've gotten it in the Kill year, but the narrative momentum wasn't great for the Bucks.
It is what it is as a program where winning 71 percent of your games earns you a dunce cap. You never get to surprise, and a flawed award given to surprises is not within your grasp.
(There's a small irony in the way this shows the multifaceted nature of the "everybody gets a trophy" trope that can be made to mean anything at any given time. On one hand, an OSU fan will say a trophy is being given for not excellence. On the other, the reason for everybody getting a trophy is young kids being upset others get something, a thing that happens with many young ones, and parents giving in. And of course, wanting a trophy you shouldn't have is exactly what OSU fans pine for in this case. The larger thought is that trophies are dumb, more for parents than kids, and send the wrong lessons to those who get them as much as those who don't. /End Side Rant)