header pic

The SEC Forum at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Texas A&M Aggies and related news

 (Read 58 times)

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4636
  • Liked:
Texas A&M Aggies and related news
« on: December 16, 2025, 04:01:38 PM »
So, A&M playing Miami in it's first CFP game.  I think we're very evenly matched, and I like our odds with the game being at home.  

I'm excited about this game not just because of our potential playoff run, but how well we have done (overall) under Elko.  Last year it seemed like we were turning a corner, and then we laid an egg in November, but we still finished with 8 wins, and came tantalizingly close to 9/10 wins.  OT loss vs Auburn, and then a late collapse against USC in the bowl game.  One of the things I've harped on on this board and others is how A&M has not had two *successful seasons in a row since the early 90's.  

Successful means either conference champions, or 10+ wins.  You may be able to call 97/97 successful, because in 97 we reached the Big 12 CCG, but we got bodied by Nebraksa when they were peak NU, and then lost the bowl game to an also very good UCLA and Cade McNown.  1998 we obviously won the Big 12, but in 1999 we took a step back, and then it was pretty much the Mack and Stoops show for a decade plus.  

So all that being said, 8-5 last year, 11-1 this year with the chance to win 12 or more is a wonderful year in my book.  I'm not sure who all is returning in '26, and frankly with the NIL and portal and all the noise I don't think anybody knows, even the players yet.  But I like the direction we're trending, and if Elko can maintain momentum in '26 and beyond it will be the first time in 3 decades we've had real sustained success.

I have to temper myself because the schedule is very tough , and success may not be measured in W/L.  Also, we will have new OC/DC among other staff changes.  But Alabama and Georgia have the same issues year over year.  

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25413
  • Liked:
Re: Texas A&M Aggies and related news
« Reply #1 on: Today at 09:39:45 AM »
Yup, TAMU and Miami are pretty evenly matched.

Just comparing it to the Aggie-Texas game,  I think Miami is a little better along both lines, which is going to be a matchup problem for the Ags.  And Miami's rushing defense is better than Texas' and I expect that to be a challenge as well.

But TAMU plays very well at times, and the game's at home.  I think that gives A&M a slight edge.  I think the Ags should win a close one but wouldn't be surprised if it goes the other way.

As for next season, the Ags' schedule is going to be tougher.  I think 8-4/9-3 is a reasonable expectation.  With the 2025 Aggie schedule as it was, I don't think it's realistic to extrapolate into 2026 from there.

And although it's true that Alabama and Georgia have the same issues of reloading year after year and always seem to manage them, I don't think A&M is on that level yet.  I'm not being overly critical, because despite back-to-back trips to the playoffs' Final 4, Texas is clearly not on that level either.  This season was a clear step backward for the Longhorns, and given the increased difficulty of the schedule, I expect something similar for A&M next year.  I could certainly be surprised, though.
« Last Edit: Today at 09:58:47 AM by utee94 »

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4636
  • Liked:
Re: Texas A&M Aggies and related news
« Reply #2 on: Today at 10:34:58 AM »
Well, to be clear, NOBODY is on the same level as Georgia and Alabama over the last ~10-15 years.  So I don't expect us to be there either, but I think we (or any program really) can approach that level of consistency year over year.  

What I'm really saying is that we all deal with the same issues.  Talent leaving, coaches leaving, tough schedules, injuries, constant distractions. The good programs adapt and overcome, the others swing up and down with the tides.  Which is why I said I had to temper my expectations for '26 not in terms of W/L but more on how we stack up and match up.  Anytime you play LSU, Florida, Texas, Mizzouri, USCe, Arkansas and win all but 1 I'd call that a successful year.  Next year we get to play @LSU for the 2nd year in a row, and @ Bama.  and to finish the season we get @OU and Texas.  I made a back of the napkin guess a few days ago, I think we can be on par with some of these teams, and would take help to win a couple.  

Nobody knows yet how OU will shake out next year, or if Bama is really sustaining under KDB, or if UTenn will be able to bounce back from a disappointing '25.  8 wins is pretty much our default as it's often joked about, so if we can just squeak by 1-2 more games we're knocking on the CFP and 10 wins again, and that would be a true measure of success to me.  I'm not yet ready to declare Elko some kind of football god but I'm pleased with what he's done so far.  

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4636
  • Liked:
Re: Texas A&M Aggies and related news
« Reply #3 on: Today at 10:39:26 AM »
It's hard to get a handle on how good Miami actually is because as weak as A&M's schedule was (supposedly) I think Miami's is weaker.  We both played and Beat ND, they lost to Louisville and SMU.  They trounced Pitt, outside of that I'm not really sure who they played that I would consider a quality opponent.  USF doesn't count.  Same thing with Notre Dame.  

nwms

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
  • Liked:
Re: Texas A&M Aggies and related news
« Reply #4 on: Today at 10:44:13 AM »
it is going to be increasingly difficult to replicate elite results yr to yr due to the portal. who has depth? it's a relative question but the answer is no one has what they used to. optimistically it could make the playoff increasingly entertaining once they fix this james madison nonsense. 

how much better would ole miss/notre dame & oregon/texas be than what we're getting this week? those would be great games. instead we have two turds.

Gigem

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4636
  • Liked:
Re: Texas A&M Aggies and related news
« Reply #5 on: Today at 10:53:22 AM »
it is going to be increasingly difficult to replicate elite results yr to yr due to the portal. who has depth? it's a relative question but the answer is no one has what they used to. optimistically it could make the playoff increasingly entertaining once they fix this james madison nonsense.

how much better would ole miss/notre dame & oregon/texas be than what we're getting this week? those would be great games. instead we have two turds.
One thing I need to clarify is that I'm not looking for "elite results" year over year.  I mean, yeah, I'd like to go 16-0 or whatever the number is these days to win a CFP/NC, but what I'm saying is that we can be a consistent 9/10/11/12 game winner year over year.  You know what has kept A&M from being much more consistent in the W column?  Losing games to Miss State or Ole Miss before Kiffin got there  Not losing to Alabama or LSU when they were winning the MNC.  Losing to the 2nd tier teams that we're clearly above in terms of program level.  When you don't do that, you've got a consistent 7/8 win team, and that's the kind of consistency nobody wants.  

With the portal I think you're simply going to see a few teams not at the top replace some of the ones who are consistently at the top.  Not sure yet how that will shake out, but hello Indiana, and Texas Tech.  And Maybe A&M.  The big question is will you see Alabama/Georgia/Ohio State fall out of that top spot?  

nwms

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Posts: 179
  • Liked:
Re: Texas A&M Aggies and related news
« Reply #6 on: Today at 11:25:39 AM »
i u/s you - i'm just talking about the landscape moreover as opposed to pushing back necessarily on your expectations/hopes.

i think it will be interesting to see if any of these schools develop nil fatigue at some point.

as for this game texas clearly (to me) gelled the last half of the season offensively. they worked vandy & the georgia game was misleading if you didn't watch it. that turned on a wonderfully timed onside kick. uga deserves credit but in no way are they winning 35-10 in a rematch. i say all that to say by the time they got to atm they were playing at an elite level imo & had them at home. thinking about that result & miami losing to turds like louisville & smu i just have a hard time believing they're going to go on the road & win at atm. feels like a 30-27 type game to me.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.