header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~

 (Read 123215 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1624 on: March 20, 2018, 12:17:45 PM »
Why is Marquette still dragging DePaul around with them? Travel partner? Chicago market?

Get Loyola on board instead...
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11238
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1625 on: March 20, 2018, 12:28:17 PM »
Marquette played Cincy pretty well on the later half of Higgins stint at UC, as Marquette and Luvl were the only two schools to win a outright CUSA title other than Cincy, during Huggins' reign.   They had some great tussles.  

Before that though, he had his way, looks like he was 19-11 during his tenure at UC.  I remember when UC was #1 at the Bradley Center, and Brian Wardle scored all 24 Marquette points in the 1st half.    
Yeah, Dwyane Wade was a pretty good player. 
CUSA did indeed get pretty beastly once a few of the teams caught up with the Bearcats.
Loiusville, Marquette, Memphis and, to a lesser degree, Charlotte all got it going in the early 20-ots. 

I remember going to a Cincy game around that time where one of their players (Steve Logan) outscored Southern Miss 41-39. UC won the game 85-39. 

1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5504
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1626 on: March 20, 2018, 12:45:20 PM »
Talking to the wrong guy Badge.   I'd support another Jesuit school (Loyola)  over DePaul everyday of the week.

I bet few realize, DePaul (the City built this sucker) moved to a new 10,000 seat arena (no longer out at O'Hare at Rosemont), attached to McCormick Conv Ctr., and their attendance went down even further.   I've heard very little positive about the arena.  Mainly a giant PIA for fans to get to, students still don't care, despite being closer to Lincoln Park.

Kris61

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 291
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1627 on: March 20, 2018, 01:00:59 PM »
I’ve picked plenty of bad tournaments but this one takes the cake.  Three FF teams eliminated before the Sweet 16 is a first.  Only having 6 of the Sweet 16 teams right is a first.

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13094
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1628 on: March 20, 2018, 01:32:53 PM »
Steve Logan had some game

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1629 on: March 20, 2018, 02:03:51 PM »

Is it better now?  A friend of mine who graduated HS in 1994 went to UC and only stayed for about three days.  He left because the dorm they put him in was in such an awful neighborhood that he just wanted out.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1630 on: March 20, 2018, 02:39:44 PM »
Talking to the wrong guy Badge.   I'd support another Jesuit school (Loyola)  over DePaul everyday of the week.

I bet few realize, DePaul (the City built this sucker) moved to a new 10,000 seat arena (no longer out at O'Hare at Rosemont), attached to McCormick Conv Ctr., and their attendance went down even further.   I've heard very little positive about the arena.  Mainly a giant PIA for fans to get to, students still don't care, despite being closer to Lincoln Park.
Yeah, so.. McCormick Place. 

I can't even get started on what a bad idea an arena there was. Now that it's open, people are already wishing it was closed.

It could turn out to be the Rahmfather's albatross, among many other opportunities he has for that purpose.

as of today, there are two "concerts" scheduled, and a bunch of WNBA games. Not gonna move any meters with those, not to mention DePaul games.

They should have just fixed up Alumni Hall and been done with it.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11238
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1631 on: March 20, 2018, 09:43:19 PM »
Is it better now?  A friend of mine who graduated HS in 1994 went to UC and only stayed for about three days.  He left because the dorm they put him in was in such an awful neighborhood that he just wanted out.  
Yeah, I had a similar experience in 98. I stuck it out for the quarter though, and then transferred to OSU over Christmas break. While OSU isn't exactly in the greatest neighborhood, it might as well have been Beverly Hills compared to Clifton. 
But yes, it is quite a bit better now. I had a family friend go there in 2005, and the area around the campus had been completely torn down and rebuilt from the ground up. It was all new and nice. At the time it was sorta lipstick on a pig, as all it did was push the hood back a couple of blocks, but then good ole gentrification has since transformed Over the Rhine and Cliffton into a halfway decent community. 
Back in the nineties though, it might as well have been a demilitarized zone. 
Where's Cincydawg when you need him? 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

PSUinNC

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 242
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1632 on: March 21, 2018, 09:10:41 AM »
Excited to see PSU getting some quality road wins in the NIT if nothing else.  Dominated ND at their place, and played Marquette very well last night and actually defended the 3 for once very well.  Were without two of their top 7 guys too (Watkins out for season, Bostick suspended for past two games).  Nice to see guys like Harrar getting some good experience and extra practice time.

If Carr is smart and comes back (he's not NBA ready and could be a first rounder with another year under his belt), PSU is priming for a nice run next year.  

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20320
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1633 on: March 21, 2018, 10:02:37 AM »
I'm seeing Carr as a borderline 1st rounder this year.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1634 on: March 21, 2018, 10:31:06 AM »
Excited to see PSU getting some quality road wins in the NIT if nothing else.  Dominated ND at their place, and played Marquette very well last night and actually defended the 3 for once very well.  Were without two of their top 7 guys too (Watkins out for season, Bostick suspended for past two games).  Nice to see guys like Harrar getting some good experience and extra practice time.

If Carr is smart and comes back (he's not NBA ready and could be a first rounder with another year under his belt), PSU is priming for a nice run next year.  
I'm rooting for PSU to win the NIT. I always root for major conference teams in the NIT because small conference fans seem to be convinced that they get screwed in the NCAA when, in fact, the opposite is true.  Typically the NIT is won by a major conference team:
  • 2017:  TCU
  • 2016:  George Washington
  • 2015:  Stanford
  • 2014:  Minnesota
  • 2013:  Baylor
  • 2012:  Stanford
  • 2011:  Wichita State
  • 2010:  Dayton
  • 2009:  Penn State
  • 2008:  Ohio State
  • 2007:  WVU
  • 2006:  USCe
  • 2005:  USCe
  • 2004:  Michigan
  • 2003:  St. Johns, subsequently vacated, Georgetown was runner-up
  • 2002:  Memphis
  • 2001:  Tulsa
  • 2000:  Wake
  • 1999:  Cal
  • 1998:  Minnesota, subsequently vacated, Penn State was runner-up
Note that over the past 20 years the NIT winner has usually come from a major conference.  

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20320
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1635 on: March 21, 2018, 10:54:54 AM »
I don't really find that as evidence of anything.  Just like VCU making the Final 4 in 2011 didn't prove they were deserving of a bid.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1636 on: March 21, 2018, 11:05:50 AM »
I don't really find that as evidence of anything.  Just like VCU making the Final 4 in 2011 didn't prove they were deserving of a bid.
I disagree based on volume.  
I agree with you that once doesn't prove much or anything but I believe that is because one is too small of a sample size.  Thus, I believe that the fact that Minnesota won the NIT in 2014 does NOT "prove" that Minnesota was the best team left out of the NCAA.  However, looking at 20 years I think there is reasonable evidence that the best team left out is typically a major conference school because major conference schools typically win the NIT.  

TyphonInc

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Easily Amused
  • Liked:
Re: ~2017-18 Big Ten Basketball Thread~
« Reply #1637 on: March 21, 2018, 11:10:14 AM »
I’ve picked plenty of bad tournaments but this one takes the cake.  Three FF teams eliminated before the Sweet 16 is a first.  Only having 6 of the Sweet 16 teams right is a first.
My wife and I only have 4 teams left in our brackets.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.