header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread

 (Read 21897 times)

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5498
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #182 on: September 10, 2018, 09:59:59 PM »
She shouldn't have fallen for the Sharkwater in Iowa City.  Stick to the Schlitzes.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37390
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #183 on: September 10, 2018, 10:47:56 PM »
Hawkeyes can't handle the Sharkwater!
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25046
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #184 on: September 11, 2018, 06:46:05 AM »
I used to have a "no drink" policy before games, so those late starts were a real challenge for me. I've relaxed a little bit, but I don't go to nearly as many games as I used to. The old back doesn't much care for bench seating.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25046
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #185 on: September 11, 2018, 11:20:27 AM »
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37390
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #186 on: September 11, 2018, 11:51:46 AM »
plenty of R-FR on the defensive 2-deep

young team, not as young as UNL
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Anonymous Coward

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 3187
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #187 on: September 11, 2018, 02:32:33 PM »
(1) What's with the OR between Dietzen and Van Lanen?

(2) Until the Badgers find a kid named Cheesecurd, I'm not gonna believe there's a more Wisconsin name than Loudermilk

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25046
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #188 on: September 11, 2018, 02:37:56 PM »
(1) What's with the OR between Dietzen and Van Lanen?

(2) Until the Badgers find a kid named Cheesecurd, I'm not gonna believe there's a more Wisconsin name than Loudermilk
1. Respect for Deitzen, who has played through every injury he possibly could during his time in Madison. Everyone knows Van Lanen is better. Deitzen will be a starting guard next season.
2. Loudermilk is from Kansas. ;)
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MarqHusker

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 5498
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #189 on: September 11, 2018, 02:45:55 PM »
Yeah,  Loudermilk doesn't scream Wisconsin to me.
Here's a fun breakdown, of select people in Wisconsin with the following surnames and of that total number the % of those surnames nationwide which are found in Wisconsin.   This is funny to me, as I know people with these names. I cut it off at 50%



































































Dantoin58 100.00%
Druwiski    2 100.00%
Samorske     7 100.00%
Schadrie    84 100.00%
Skaletski     82 94.25%
Debauch     70 90.91%
Hockers     161 89.94%
Davister7989.77%
Dequaine    10389.57%
Lasee     18887.85%
VanDreel     121 86.43%
VanLannen    9685.71%
Szprejda    2083.33%
VanPay     17481.31%
Alsteen    276 80.70%
Scray     10980.15%
Duquaine     212 80.00%
Mancheski     14880.00%
VanElzen     6779.76%
Rentmeester     38279.42%
Debraske    1178.57%
Denil     8377.57%
Laluzerne     19976.54%
Williquette     244 76.25%
VanEgeren     10276.12%
Skenandore     378 76.06%
Vandehei     310 75.79%
VanLanen     36275.10%
Delveaux     124 74.25%
VanVonderen    75 73.53%
Watermolen     154 73.33%
Metoxen     19673.13%
Ditzman     21 72.41%
Derpinghaus    36 70.59%
VanEnkenvoort     2470.59%
Debauche     314 70.40%
Lecaptain     8270.08%
Eisch     16870.00%
Witbro     14 70.00%
Dachelet     10069.93%
VanSistine    74 69.16%
Lemerond     170 68.00%
Baeten     311 67.90%
Zimonick     37 66.07%
Golueke     5165.38%
Xolot    1365.00%
Pamperin     258 63.70%
Delaruelle     5463.53%
VanLaanen    16863.40%
Kazik     118 63.10%
Seroogy     5061.73%
Tappa     116 61.70%
Luchterhand     10660.57%
Gigot    78 59.09%
Truttmann     6458.72%
Smet     33157.97%
Peot     17857.23%
Joppe     2756.25%
Detrie     74 55.64%
Puissant     1954.29%
Denamur8154.00%
Mooren     8052.29%
Keuler     14451.99%
Gossens     61 51.69%
Berken     199 51.69%
Torinus     18 51.43%
Trinkner     5750.89%

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25046
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #190 on: September 11, 2018, 03:50:42 PM »
The Cephus case is now going to trial. He'll never suit up as a Badger again now - no way they allow it. Kid f'd up big time. Cost himself a great education and possibly an NFL career. That's what thinking with the little head will get you. STUPID.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11228
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #191 on: September 15, 2018, 06:51:11 PM »
I'd like to think BYU is better than last year, but beating Arizona only means they beat Kevin Sumlin...
Maybe both? 
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7848
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #192 on: September 15, 2018, 07:20:49 PM »
At least we can put to bed this stuff about the offensive line.

Hornibrook wasn’t consistent enough. Taylor had a not special game when it turned out it was needed. But those are smaller things. 

Defense couldn’t hold up against the run. run game couldn’t be better than slightly functional. Don’t win against solid teams that way. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25046
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #193 on: September 16, 2018, 09:43:30 AM »
That was a complete failure from top-to-bottom. UW was outcoached and outplayed, period. BYU punched them in the mouth and they couldn't punch back. This has to get fixed, quickly.


Losing Van Gickle really hurt the defense and losing Neuville really hurt the offense. Hopefully they can come back quickly. Gink was in a walking boot after halftime. Not good.


I expected a much-improved BYU team to show up. I certainly didn't expect a loss. One of my friends who watched it with me said he was shocked. I was not - more disappointed in the effort than anything else. Probably the worst loss of PC's career at UW.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25046
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #194 on: September 16, 2018, 09:55:40 AM »
At least we can put to bed this stuff about the offensive line. 
Too early to think that way. UW was not prepared yesterday, and that's on the coaching staff.
I'm much more worried about that DL than I am about the OL.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7848
  • Liked:
Re: Wisconsin 2018 Season Thread
« Reply #195 on: September 16, 2018, 10:17:43 AM »
It’s interesting, UW often has this game. I’ve watched it through the years. One that’s just not great. One where they’re behind the 8 ball against a team with think is worse. And most of the time they win ugly, and maybe it means something, maybe not. And sometimes, that game comes on a day where the other team makes enough plays and UW doesn’t.

It does remind me that the whole “going vanilla” thing is usually a way to excuse angst about not looking great rather than actual reflection of game plan. Those late 2000s teams had a few slow starts I dismissed that way, and it was a good lesson.

(FWIW, offensive plays work like this most often. You have your base plays. That’s over 80 percent of your in-game scheme. The stuff that changes game to game is smaller and subtle. Your base is what wins most games. The extra stuff is trying to get small edges here and there. There’s a few exceptions, but you need a good coach for it to work. Chryst vs OSU in 2016 was about the most extensive expansion of things, and it left Urby impressed)

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.