Author
Topic: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)
(Read 17812 times)

OrangeAfroMan · « **Reply #196 on:** December 07, 2020, 12:27:29 PM »

Quote from: Brutus Buckeye on December 07, 2020, 10:01:30 AM

I didn't realize that they were so bereft of history and tradition.

That must suck.

We have tons of that. It just wore Crimson.

Brutus Buckeye · « **Reply #197 on:** December 07, 2020, 12:29:38 PM »

Still does.

medinabuckeye1 · « **Reply #198 on:** December 07, 2020, 12:33:05 PM »

Quote from: CWSooner on December 07, 2020, 08:09:00 AM

10 meetings from 1916 to 1953. You'd never know that they were in the same conference with each other.
For much of its history, the SEC was more a consortium of teams that occasionally played each other than a true conference.

Exactly.

When I read @OrangeAfroMan 's post I was surprised that UF was ahead of UTenn overall and flat out shocked that it was by such a large margin. I knew, as he stated above, that TN was generally the SEC's #2 for much of their history. I looked at it as somewhat similar to tOSU/M meaning:

I assumed that TN would have a big advantage over UF early on (like M over tOSU)

However, tOSU STILL hasn't caught Michigan in the H2H series so I mentally converted that to TN/UF and would have assumed that UF hadn't caught TN yet especially because I also assumed that TN's pre-Spurrier lead over UF would have been bigger than M's lead over tOSU from the same timeframe.

I was right about all of that, but I didn't realize how few games UT and UF had played prior to 1990. 1989 was the last time UF and TN didn't play. Prior to that:

Tennesse was .684 against Florida but it was just 13-6 on only 19 games
Michigan was .587 against tOSU but it was 48-33-5 on 86 games

From 1990 to 2019:

Florida was .767 against TN, 23-7 on 30 games
Ohio State was .650 against M, 19-10-1 on 30 games

The lack of early games does seem weird for two teams that have been in the same conference since 1921.

OrangeAfroMan · « **Reply #199 on:** December 07, 2020, 01:54:17 PM »

It's part of the reason 4 of the 12 SEC schools held the other hostage for the permanent cross-divisional games. Sure, UGA-Auburn and Bama-TEnnessee had longtime rivalries with each other, but the rest of us didn't with the others in the conference.

Take Florida, pre-division play. We were paired up with LSU. Why? Don't ask why, there's no real reason. Up to 1990 (when they were decided, not implemented for play until 1992):
Gms - Opp
69 - UGA
68 - Auburn
49 - Miami (OOC)
45 - Miss State
41 - Kentucky
39 - GA Tech (OOC)
37 - LSU.......................so we're paired with the 7th-most played program, 5th-most within the then-current SEC, and 3rd-most West team. What?!? Well, UGA was married to Auburn. And it wasn't Miss State because......reasons?

Okay, so maybe LSU's most common East program was Florida?
Nuuupe.

Gms-Opp
81 - Miss State
80 - Tulane (OOC)
74 - Ole Miss
54 - Rice (OOC)
52 - Alabama
43 - Texas A&M (OOC)
41 - Kentucky
37 - Florida..................So the 8th-most played, 5th within the SEC, and the 2nd-most East team.
.
2 actual rivals basically held the rest of us hostage to get their games, and the rest of us were thrown together like a sandwich.
Alabama-Tennessee were PB& J,
Auburn-Georgia were ham & cheese,
The rest of us are bologna & ketchup.

medinabuckeye1 · « **Reply #200 on:** December 07, 2020, 05:20:25 PM »

Quote from: OrangeAfroMan on December 07, 2020, 01:54:17 PM

2 actual rivals basically held the rest of us hostage to get their games, and the rest of us were thrown together like a sandwich.
Alabama-Tennessee were PB& J,
Auburn-Georgia were ham & cheese,
The rest of us are bologna & ketchup.

It seems to me it would have made more sense to just not have permanent cross-overs for the other four (now five) teams in each division. At this point I don't think there would be too much wailing and gnashing of teeth even if they eliminated Bama/TN so they could just be like the B1G with only one permanent cross-over (UGA/Auburn for the SEC, PU/IU for the B1G).

Bama/TN:
Here is Bama's winning percentage and # of games against each (then) member of the SEC through 1991 (ie, immediately prior to SEC Divisional play beginning in 1992 - I realize that they made the call in 1990 but I'm using the start date rather than the decision date):

MissSt, 74 games, .831, 60-11-3
TN, 73 games, .589, 40-27-6
Vandy, 69 games, .710, 47-18-4
UGA, 57 games, .605, 33-21-3
LSU, 54 games, .713, 36-13-5
Auburn, 50 games, .630, 31-18-1
Ole Miss, 35 games, .829, 26-5-2
Kentucky, 32 games, .953, 30-1-1
Florida, 25 games, .680, 17-8
USCe, 7 games, 1.000, 7-0
Arky, 2 games, 1.000, 2-0

SEC-E teams in Bold.
Back then TN/Bama appeared to make sense since TN had the best record against Bama of the SEC-E teams and on top of that second best was UGA who was paired up with Auburn so the next best would have been Florida and, pre-1992 that wasn't close at all with Bama owning better than a 2:1 advantage over the Gators.

Since then (not including this year, 1992-2019), Bama against SEC-E teams:

TN, 28 games, .625, 17-10-1
UF, 16 games, .625, 10-6
Vandy, 15 games, 1.000, 15-0
UGA, 10 games, .700, 7-3
USCe, 9 games, .667, 6-3
Kentucky, 8 games, .875, 7-1
Mizzou, 3 games, 1.000, 3-0

None of those stand out to me as must-see every year rivalries. Who cares?

OrangeAfroMan · « **Reply #201 on:** December 07, 2020, 06:07:50 PM »

Quote from: medinabuckeye1 on December 07, 2020, 05:20:25 PM

Back then TN/Bama appeared to make sense since TN had the best record against Bama of the SEC-E teams and on top of that second best was UGA who was paired up with Auburn so the next best would have been Florida and, pre-1992 that wasn't close at all with Bama owning better than a 2:1 advantage over the Gators.

Except that this had absolutely nothing to do with it.
Both for either:
a) how well each team did vs Bama (huh?)
b) best vs best, next best vs next best, etc..

Nope. It was 4 teams whining that they'd lose their rival. The other 8 just bent over.

Brutus Buckeye · « **Reply #202 on:** December 07, 2020, 06:52:35 PM »

I always liked the SEC set up, where they go to great lengths to preserve rivalries both in and out of Conference. Unless of course you are aTm...

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.

Topic: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)

OrangeAfroMan

Re: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)

Brutus Buckeye

Re: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)

medinabuckeye1

Re: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)

OrangeAfroMan

Re: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)

medinabuckeye1

Re: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)

OrangeAfroMan

Re: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)

Brutus Buckeye

Re: Wake Up and Smell the Chaos (SOC 12-5-20)