header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11   Go Down
Author

Topic: Sugar: #7 Notre Dame 23, #2 Georgia 10 Post Game

 (Read 4224 times)

jgvol

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5848
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #112 on: January 02, 2025, 07:17:25 PM »
Kirby getting a coaching clinic. 😂
Logged

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6918
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #113 on: January 02, 2025, 07:19:37 PM »
Quote from: jgvol on January 02, 2025, 07:17:25 PM
Kirby getting a coaching clinic. 😂
That was amazing!
Logged
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 19973
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #114 on: January 02, 2025, 07:32:37 PM »
Longhorns lost to this team twice??? Well we lost to Moore's poor rendition of the weasels
Logged
"Let us endeavor so to live - that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." - Mark Twain

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1841
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #115 on: January 02, 2025, 07:38:50 PM »
The Irish didn't play the toughest of schedules this year, but it does seem like they belonged in the playoff.
Logged

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 19973
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #116 on: January 02, 2025, 07:40:11 PM »
Teams that got playoff byes, 0-4.
Logged
"Let us endeavor so to live - that when we come to die even the undertaker will be sorry." - Mark Twain

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9344
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #117 on: January 02, 2025, 07:43:52 PM »
Quote from: MrNubbz on January 02, 2025, 07:32:37 PM
Longhorns lost to this team twice??? Well we lost to Moore's poor rendition of the weasels
The SEC is kinda mid this year. But so is everyone else. 
Logged

jgvol

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 5848
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #118 on: January 02, 2025, 07:44:19 PM »
Quote from: MrNubbz on January 02, 2025, 07:40:11 PM
Teams that got playoff byes, 0-4.

Sitting up getting rusty.  

Logged

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14514
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #119 on: January 02, 2025, 07:48:01 PM »
Quote from: SFBadger96 on January 02, 2025, 07:38:50 PM
The Irish didn't play the toughest of schedules this year, but it does seem like they belonged in the playoff.

Eh. They beat the Hoosiers who weren't really all that good, and we all knew it. You know flat out that from a talent perspective, ND just out-talents IU pretty much across the entire roster. That didn't prove they belonged.

They beat Georgia with their backup QB despite being outgained on offense. They benefited from a short field turnover leading to a TD and a special teams TD (kickoff return). Other than those, the best they could manage is 3 FGs, all >40 yards. Tough to argue a counterfactual, but do we really think it would have looked like this if Carson Beck was healthy? 

One might say that the draw of a paper tiger IU team followed by a Georgia team down their starting QB was...

...the Luck o' the Irish!


Logged

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6918
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #120 on: January 02, 2025, 07:55:16 PM »
Quote from: bayareabadger on January 02, 2025, 07:43:52 PM
The SEC is kinda mid this year. But so is everyone else.
Perhaps.  But the one SEC team left is as capable of winning it all as anyone.   
Logged
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22874
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #2 Georgia (11-2) vs. #7 Notre Dame (12-1)
« Reply #121 on: January 02, 2025, 08:12:06 PM »
Maybe they could show that walk on a few more times, bring up the fact that its definitely his fault, and then say they feel bad for him
Logged

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1841
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #7 Notre Dame 23, #2 Georgia 10 Post Game
« Reply #122 on: January 02, 2025, 08:20:34 PM »
Quote from: betarhoalphadelta on January 02, 2025, 07:48:01 PM
Eh. They beat the Hoosiers who weren't really all that good, and we all knew it. You know flat out that from a talent perspective, ND just out-talents IU pretty much across the entire roster. That didn't prove they belonged.

They beat Georgia with their backup QB despite being outgained on offense. They benefited from a short field turnover leading to a TD and a special teams TD (kickoff return). Other than those, the best they could manage is 3 FGs, all >40 yards. Tough to argue a counterfactual, but do we really think it would have looked like this if Carson Beck was healthy?

One might say that the draw of a paper tiger IU team followed by a Georgia team down their starting QB was...

...the Luck o' the Irish!



LOL.
I appreciate your dedication to the craft. :-)
Logged

Honestbuckeye

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6918
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #7 Notre Dame 23, #2 Georgia 10 Post Game
« Reply #123 on: January 02, 2025, 08:40:54 PM »
Quote from: betarhoalphadelta on January 02, 2025, 07:48:01 PM
Eh. They beat the Hoosiers who weren't really all that good, and we all knew it. You know flat out that from a talent perspective, ND just out-talents IU pretty much across the entire roster. That didn't prove they belonged.

They beat Georgia with their backup QB despite being outgained on offense. They benefited from a short field turnover leading to a TD and a special teams TD (kickoff return). Other than those, the best they could manage is 3 FGs, all >40 yards. Tough to argue a counterfactual, but do we really think it would have looked like this if Carson Beck was healthy?

One might say that the draw of a paper tiger IU team followed by a Georgia team down their starting QB was...

...the Luck o' the Irish!



The Hoosiers played ND closer than Georgia did, and scored more than Georgia did.  And Indiana did it in South Bend.  So, there is that…
Logged
Get your facts first, then you can distort them as you please.
-Mark Twain

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45511
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #7 Notre Dame 23, #2 Georgia 10 Post Game
« Reply #124 on: January 02, 2025, 09:40:47 PM »
the Hoosiers weren't great but they were better than the SEC
Logged
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22874
  • Liked:
Re: Sugar: #7 Notre Dame 23, #2 Georgia 10 Post Game
« Reply #125 on: January 02, 2025, 09:44:51 PM »
Feel pretty ok saying they were one of the top 12
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 [9] 10 11   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
Custom Candied Sign

Molon Labe Medallion