header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Stadiums and Summaries

 (Read 2494 times)

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 15363
  • Liked:
Re: Stadiums and Summaries
« Reply #84 on: Today at 10:17:32 AM »
I think LV will replace the Fiesta in the coming 10 years, or less.
That's fair. If you think the endgame is to become one of the CFP bowls, there's obviously value in that.

I was arguing against the idea that being a "top second-tier bowl" was all that desirable--or achievable, since they're currently below said Citrus and ReliaQuest bowls in the pecking order and I don't know how they move up...

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 33245
  • Liked:
Re: Stadiums and Summaries
« Reply #85 on: Today at 10:20:15 AM »
That's fair. If you think the endgame is to become one of the CFP bowls, there's obviously value in that.

I was arguing against the idea that being a "top second-tier bowl" was all that desirable--or achievable, since they're currently below said Citrus and ReliaQuest bowls in the pecking order and I don't know how they move up...

They move up by paying more.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11165
  • Liked:
Re: Stadiums and Summaries
« Reply #86 on: Today at 11:54:11 AM »
They move up by paying more.
Yeah, I was going to say the same thing.  If LV offers more cash, the B1G will take it.  Our #2 has been going to the Citrus for decades but that is also flexible now and it wasn't always that way.  Long ago it was the Gator Bowl.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 33245
  • Liked:
Re: Stadiums and Summaries
« Reply #87 on: Today at 11:56:27 AM »
It would be good to not so have much tied into Florida. For a while we had the Citrus, Outback, Champs, Gator and the random Orange. That's a lot of Florida.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11165
  • Liked:
Re: Stadiums and Summaries
« Reply #88 on: Today at 12:12:30 PM »
It would be good to not so have much tied into Florida. For a while we had the Citrus, Outback, Champs, Gator and the random Orange. That's a lot of Florida.
I agree and think that this would help attendance for two reasons:
  • People who travel to the games would, I think, be more likely to do so if you gave them variation in destinations.  They might look at a Florida Bowl and think "been there, done that" but look at a bowl in Vegas, or SoCal or San Antonio and think "I haven't been there, lets go".  
  • Fans/Alums living in the area, I think, would be more likely to go if it is once in a while and less likely if they have the opportunity every year.  


SuperMario

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1915
  • Liked:
Re: Stadiums and Summaries
« Reply #89 on: Today at 12:41:50 PM »
It would be good to not so have much tied into Florida. For a while we had the Citrus, Outback, Champs, Gator and the random Orange. That's a lot of Florida.
For the midwest, it's always been a good thing and still easy. Florida is a very easy flight destination. Personally, i have no desire to hit Vegas or SoCal for a bowl game, but I'm sure there's plenty that feel the opposite. I believe most common age demographic is 35-44. No idea if those are single, married, parents, etc as I think that would play a factor.

If all important bowls were in Texas, Arizona or Florida, I'd be good with that.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 15363
  • Liked:
Re: Stadiums and Summaries
« Reply #90 on: Today at 01:07:07 PM »
They move up by paying more.
Yeah, I was going to say the same thing.  If LV offers more cash, the B1G will take it.  Our #2 has been going to the Citrus for decades but that is also flexible now and it wasn't always that way.  Long ago it was the Gator Bowl. 
True. I guess then you ask what is the true return on investment for SRS Distribution, and how willing are ReliaQuest or Cheez-It willing to match to keep their prominence? 

I would think Cheez-It, being a consumer brand, is probably deeper pockets for consumer/retail type brand advertising than either of the other two who are more B2B brands*. Not sure SRS would outspend Cheez-It. SRS could maybe outspend ReliaQuest if they really wanted. 

I think the answer is that these brands are going to have an upper limit on spending based on what they think the ROI is. Does SRS get enough added exposure getting the 5th-6th place B1G/SEC team vs the 7th place B1G/SEC team to outspend Cheez-It? 

 * This goes to the golf thing... Some of the biggest golf advertisers are B2B companies, because they know the golf viewership skews older, more professional, and probably in a more likely place to be making decisions that affect a company. So Workday, or SalesForce, etc makes sense. Retail brands are things like Rolex, and of course boner pills for that demographic lol... College football demographics probably trend differently, which is why the companies ponying up for CFP bowl branding are almost all targeted at individual consumers rather than B2B...

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12590
  • Liked:
Re: Stadiums and Summaries
« Reply #91 on: Today at 01:57:58 PM »


If Squeez-it can be taken down, cheez-it can too. 




 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.