Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

how do you cook your steaks?

Grill? Oven? Cast iron on the stove ?

Take it to the cookbook thread!!



(Cast iron on the grill)

From the NYT, apparently derived from cellphone location data.

That is really telling right there. Of course, some have no choice. We can walk to our store (and liquor store). Some people have to travel to another county.

Looks pretty familiar doesn't it?  Like, if you overlaid one on the other, there'd be quite a bit of correlation?

Here we are back to your "statistics" discussion.

The twitter response to that graph is right here:

Without digging back into the colorblindness discussion... Does that look wrong to anyone else?

The <2.5 looks pretty yellow, and I don't see that color anywhere on the map. It certainly doesn't appear to match the lightest color on the map.

2.5-5 percent looks too dark for the second-lightest color on the map. 

And how is it REMOTELY possible that the areas of the western states which are SO much lower in population density than the South are not more heavily represented? 

I realize this is "no car" and no supermarket within a mile, and maybe those areas have higher car ownership. But the people without cars probably aren't the ones regularly traveling over 2 miles... I assume the original NYT graph had some sort of a cutoff in population... I.e. my wife is regularly traveling >2 miles because we live 13 miles from her work and she's going every day. And I'm going to Costco which is >2 miles away but it's once a week at most. 

You'd think the ones with no car and >1 mile to the supermarket are already trying to limit their travel because they have no car. 

There's something hinky there...

Without digging back into the colorblindness discussion... Does that look wrong to anyone else?

The <2.5 looks pretty yellow, and I don't see that color anywhere on the map. It certainly doesn't appear to match the lightest color on the map.

2.5-5 percent looks too dark for the second-lightest color on the map.

And how is it REMOTELY possible that the areas of the western states which are SO much lower in population density than the South are not more heavily represented?

I realize this is "no car" and no supermarket within a mile, and maybe those areas have higher car ownership. But the people without cars probably aren't the ones regularly traveling over 2 miles... I assume the original NYT graph had some sort of a cutoff in population... I.e. my wife is regularly traveling >2 miles because we live 13 miles from her work and she's going every day. And I'm going to Costco which is >2 miles away but it's once a week at most.

You'd think the ones with no car and >1 mile to the supermarket are already trying to limit their travel because they have no car.

There's something hinky there...

Eh.  Can't speak for all of the western states but in West Texas, most of the towns are less than a mile across and so nobody's traveling farther than a mile to go ANYWHERE.

The first shitheel who posted the NYT graph on twitter simply gave the comment:

"The South"

So fuck that guy and the assholes who think like him. 

Preach it.

The first shitheel who posted the NYT graph on twitter simply gave the comment:

"The South"

So fuck that guy and the assholes who think like him. 

Well my first thought was "the red are all the people thinking it was a hoax"....just matter-of-factly.