header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Rankings ... ugh

 (Read 84596 times)

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17802
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1470 on: November 30, 2023, 06:52:05 PM »
you realize sagarin has oregon ranked above texas, right? so even despite the schedule difference, sagarin thinks it's close enough to rank oregon higher. or his formula does anyway. that's all i'm saying. it's close enough that other things matter as well.
Yeah uh-huh okay.

Anyway, good luck to your team on Saturday. Should be an entertaining game.  

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1471 on: November 30, 2023, 07:20:57 PM »
nah, mulligan isn't counted on score card. this one will. sorry.
I know how this works
ask Nubbz
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37803
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1472 on: November 30, 2023, 07:22:54 PM »
Ha!

FearlessCD is stirring the pot.

Texas would certainly draw more eyeballs than Oregon.

Glad to see someone picked up the slack while I was working
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13130
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1473 on: November 30, 2023, 08:23:12 PM »
Oregon v. Texas is a good debate. My gut is the committee would just slot in the Oregon/Washington winner as if they were one and the same.

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17204
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1474 on: November 30, 2023, 09:09:12 PM »
nah, mulligan isn't counted on score card. this one will. sorry.


I know how this works
ask Nubbz
A thieving 2nd shot employed by duffers to prove the 1st one was no fluke !!!

If Bama beats Georgia then the Dawgs are out,Can't leave the 'Horns out with Bama in unless they lose to the Pokes.Wouldn't bother me but the Texicans are said to be thinned skinned and sensitive.
Don't go to bed with any woman crazier than you. - Frank Zappa

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17802
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1475 on: November 30, 2023, 11:53:46 PM »
Oregon Duffers.

Yup, has a nice ring to it.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18940
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1476 on: December 01, 2023, 12:04:58 AM »
If UGA loses, they should be out of the discussion IMHO.  If every other favorite wins, I'd have the 3 UNDs and Texas personally.
If UGA loses, they're still in.
Bama would be in, UGA would be in, UM, and UW/UO winner.

Yes, even at the expense of an undefeated FSU.
A - they suck w/o J.Travis
B - beating Louisville is a big WHO CARES now, since they lost to UK.

The 2-time defending NCs with a 12-1 record won't be omitted. 
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17802
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1477 on: December 01, 2023, 12:37:19 AM »
If UGA loses, they're still in.
Bama would be in, UGA would be in, UM, and UW/UO winner.

Yes, even at the expense of an undefeated FSU.
A - they suck w/o J.Travis
B - beating Louisville is a big WHO CARES now, since they lost to UK.

The 2-time defending NCs with a 12-1 record won't be omitted. 
Could certainly happen, but it would be the first time ever the committee has put in a non-champ over a champ, when they had the same record.  And it would look especially questionable given Texas H2H win over the same Alabama team that just knocked off the non-champ Georgia Bulldogs.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18940
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1478 on: December 01, 2023, 01:02:50 AM »
I'm just saying what would happen, not what should happen or that it would be 'right'.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17802
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1479 on: December 01, 2023, 01:21:52 AM »
It would break an entire decade of tendencies, but sure, it could still happen.

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18940
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1480 on: December 01, 2023, 03:13:13 AM »
It would break an entire decade of tendencies, but sure, it could still happen.
We haven't had a 2-time defending champ on the bubble in the playoff era yet.  So it's a novel situation.  
I have no faith in the playoff committee treating this season in isolation.  
.
Considering 2014-now, Texas is a 'Johnny-come-lately' and Georgia is royalty.  Shouldn't matter, but probably would.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

MaximumSam

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13130
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1481 on: December 01, 2023, 07:52:01 AM »
I see the argument for leaving FSU out, but man, leaving out an undefeated conference champ - I just don't see it happening.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 72190
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1482 on: December 01, 2023, 07:57:42 AM »
"We" here are trying to guess what the committee might do.  I'd be surprised if a 12-1 UGA is included over a13-0 FSU.  No need to speculate, for me anyway, I'll just wait and see what happens in a few days.  Hopefully it's not at issue.

I think any P5 undefeated should be in (barring eligibility issues).  It could be fun to speculate about Upsets happening around the globe and the mayhem that could ensue.


Kris60

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2514
  • Liked:
Re: Rankings ... ugh
« Reply #1483 on: December 01, 2023, 08:04:02 AM »
I think if things break right the committee could have its toughest job yet.

A lot of interesting things could be debated.

-H2H wins 
-An undefeated P5 champion that looks vulnerable 
-A 2 time defending champion being left out after being #1 all season.
-Two teams splitting meetings, with identical records, but one has a better resume but not the conference championship.

I’m here for all of it.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.