header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: OT - Weird History

 (Read 163925 times)

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1974 on: June 06, 2023, 11:04:44 AM »
A very appropriate image as today is the 79th Anniversary of the Landings at Normandy by the allied troops.
Agreed and those boys (most were very young) went through hell on that spot.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1975 on: June 06, 2023, 11:07:55 AM »
The Utah beachhead was established without many casualties, the Omaha beach was bad.  The Germans had a seasoned division there we didn't know about.  It was understrength, but had a lot of experience in Russia.

Monty was supposed to take Caen on Day One but that was never going to happen.

medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1976 on: June 06, 2023, 11:59:46 AM »
The Utah beachhead was established without many casualties, the Omaha beach was bad.  The Germans had a seasoned division there we didn't know about.  It was understrength, but had a lot of experience in Russia.

Monty was supposed to take Caen on Day One but that was never going to happen.
I think it was Omaha that they very-nearly abandoned.  It was so rough that they seriously considered just giving up on that one and putting the troops on the others.  There were two main reasons that they didn't:
  • Evacuation would have been a bloodbath, and
  • They needed the beaches (all of them) logistically in order to be able to deliver all the stuff that needed to be delivered.  Giving one of them up would have crunched that until a wider toe-hold could be established which would have taken longer because it would have taken longer to get the necessary men and material into France.  


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1977 on: June 07, 2023, 06:22:30 AM »


The Dornier Do X: The world’s largest “flying boat”. It had a wingspan of 157 feet (48 meters) and length of 130 feet (40 meters), was powered by 12 engines and carried 169 passengers. 1929

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37483
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1978 on: June 07, 2023, 08:46:13 AM »
THIS DAY IN HISTORY: 

Zoot Suit Riots Come to an End (1943)
Named for the style of clothing favored by the mainly Mexican-American victims of these clashes, the Zoot Suit Riots erupted between American servicemen stationed in Los Angeles, California, during World War II and the city's minority residents. While the local press lauded the attacks by the servicemen and described them as having a "cleansing effect," First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt denounced them as "race riots" rooted in discrimination.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1979 on: June 07, 2023, 01:08:15 PM »

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1980 on: June 09, 2023, 07:45:04 AM »
Newton vs Leibniz, the great Calculus Controversy:
v/ PhysicsInHistory  & Cantor's Paradise
The development of calculus is one of the most important advancements in the history of mathematics and has played a critical role in the physical sciences. The dispute over its invention, often referred to as the "calculus priority dispute," was between two of the greatest mathematicians of the 17th century, Sir Isaac Newton and Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz.
Isaac Newton began developing his methods of "fluxions," (later to become known as calculus) in the mid-1660s. However, he was initially reluctant to publish his work due to his aversion to potential criticism and controversy. The ideas were used in his monumental work, "Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica," but the mathematical methods he used in the "Principia" were mostly geometric, following the mathematical style of the time.
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, a German mathematician and philosopher, started working on his version of calculus around 1674, and he first published in 1684, almost 20 years after Newton made his original discoveries. Leibniz developed much of the notation used in calculus today, including the integral sign ∫ and the d used in derivatives and integrals.
The controversy began in the early 1690s when Newton claimed that Leibniz had plagiarized his work. This was after the Royal Society received a letter from Fatio de Duillier, a Swiss mathematician and Newton's friend, claiming that Leibniz had learned of Newton's unpublished work on calculus during his visit to London in 1673.
Leibniz denied the allegations and insisted on his independent discovery. The Royal Society, which Newton presided over, set up an "impartial" committee to decide on the matter, but it was far from unbiased. In 1713, the committee published a report, written by Newton himself, which unsurprisingly concluded that Newton was the true inventor of calculus and that Leibniz was a fraud. The dispute was bitter and divisive, straining relations between English mathematicians and their continental European counterparts. In the years following, the English largely stuck to Newton's notation of fluxions while the Europeans used Leibniz's notation.
Today, historians generally agree that both Newton and Leibniz independently developed the fundamental principles of calculus, albeit with different notations and approaches. Both made substantial contributions, and the notation of calculus used today is primarily that of Leibniz. But the controversy itself is a historical testament to the high stakes and intense rivalries that can exist in the world of science and mathematics.


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1981 on: June 09, 2023, 08:25:10 AM »

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37483
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1982 on: June 09, 2023, 08:53:14 AM »
THIS DAY IN HISTORY: 

Sir Charles Kingsford Smith Completes First Transpacific Flight (1928)
The first successful transpacific flight was carried out by Australian aviator Charles Kingsford-Smith and his crew, who piloted the trimotor monoplane Southern Cross from Oakland, California, to Brisbane, Australia. During the 7,250-mi (11,668-km) journey, the Southern Cross stopped to refuel in Hawaii, then flew on to Fiji—where it was the first aircraft ever to land on the island—and then embarked on the final leg of its trip.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1983 on: June 09, 2023, 10:11:15 AM »

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1984 on: June 11, 2023, 08:07:56 AM »


When we moved to ATL in 1964, this was the only Sears in town (so far as I knew).    You ordered from their catalogue and drove down to pick it up.  It became derelict over the years and suddenly was revived into a hugely successful popular shopping center kind of thing, even in this era.  Being next to the Belt Line hasn't hurt.  We can walk to it, but it's so crowded we rarely do any more.  A baseball park was across the street for the minor league team, the Crackers.  Now it's a shopping mall with Whole Foods and a Home Depot etc.


Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1985 on: June 11, 2023, 08:13:28 AM »
Ibrahim ibn Yaqub (912-966), a traveler from medieval Muslim Spain, wrote: “walking through the bazaar’s of the city of Mainz (Germany), I was struck by two things: the first was that various spices brought from India were sold in this city, and the second was that silver dirhams minted in Samarkand were in circulation in this country.”

From the eighth to the twelfth century AD, the European region was under the influence of Islam. After the Abbasid Caliphate (750-1258) took control of the Great Silk Road, established close trade ties with China, Byzantium, the Viking tribes and the Slavs of Northern Europe. At that time, the largest medieval mints existed in the cities of Bukhara, Samarkand and Chach (Tashkent), and in the IX-X centuries silver coins were continuously issued here. These coins quickly found their way to Northern Europe without entering local circulation. Thus, it is safe to say that gold and silver dirhams minted by the caliphate were accepted as an international standard at that time and were in circulation on all trade routes.

Below is an example of a gold coin minted by the King of East England Offa (757-796). The inscriptions on the coin are copied from dirhams of Offa's contemporary Caliph Al-Mansur (754-775). Since the coin was copied fairly accurately, you can read the name of the ruler "Offa Rex" (King Offa) and the numbers 157 AH (773-74). However, it is clear that the stamper did not read Arabic. On the obverse of the coin (Obverse) there are errors in Arabic letters around the Offa inscription. On the reverse side (reverse) the word of the word "Shahada" is written.





Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1986 on: June 11, 2023, 09:27:37 AM »


In Pineville, OR, said to still have a dial tone ...

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71446
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: OT - Weird History
« Reply #1987 on: June 11, 2023, 09:40:29 AM »
Before is late 1970s and today, a spot near me:



 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.