header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: In other news ...

 (Read 1013713 times)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71633
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29876 on: March 27, 2024, 11:27:37 AM »
Then why did your man Trump order the bipartisan border deal shanked in the House?
I think it's pretty clear why, don't you think?

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14379
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29877 on: March 27, 2024, 11:29:14 AM »
Before 1967, Israel got relatively little from the US.  Their military gear was mostly French or British based stuff.  The Six Day War changed that.  Egypt et al. was in the Soviet sphere, and we wanted to counter that, Israel was a proxy.

Over time, Israel became a political focal point.  Evangelicals for various reasons decided it was worth supporting, as did most Jews, both groups usually voting for the other party in bloc, so no politician could afford to alienate his "side".  Camp David then secured aid to Israel AND Egypt.

I personally see some value in foreign aid, value for Americans.  This is a global economy, things that happen over there have an impact on us here.  And it really is a small part of overall spending (which I agree should be cut, but won't be, and taxes should go up, but that won't happen either to any real degree).  So, focus on foreign aid, to me, is focusing on your third string long snapper when your QB room is a problem.
yeah, I get the history. 

I definitely see value in foreign aid. Foreign military aid? Nah. Israel is a very wealthy country. They don't need $4 billion a year from us to buy our weapons. They can raise taxes on their civilians or raise debt and deficit spend like any other rich country. 

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14379
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29878 on: March 27, 2024, 11:34:20 AM »
Then why did your man Trump order the bipartisan border deal shanked in the House?

Getting the border control agencies the manpower and equipment they need to do said border enforcement had wholesale support from all quarters in the Senate.

This is not the argument you want to make.
Trump is not "my man".

He is just so clearly an INFINITELY better alternative to the fantastically corrupt, incompetent, diaper shitting, weak ineffective senile President we have now. In my opinion.

Biden has had 3 PLUS FCKING YEARS to try and get something done on illegal immigration at the border. He's only doing it right now because the election is in less than 8 months and he's way down in all the polls and illegal immigration is one of the top 2 priorities for virtually every American voter according to most polling. So spare me.

And it's quite obvious why the House shanked the deal. The Republicans don't want to give Biden any perceived "W's" before the election and they want him out. Both sides are assholes for this. Biden should've done something day one on the border instead of let it fester into the disaster it is. And the Republicans should've worked with him right now to get something done for America.

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14379
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29879 on: March 27, 2024, 11:38:00 AM »
Interesting.

China's Xi issues a positive message in meeting with U.S. business leaders as relations improve (msn.com)
China's Xi issues a positive message in meeting with U.S. business leaders as relations improve (msn.com)
I say this with all sincerity, fck China. Sooner US companies get out, the better for this country.

Temp430

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 2513
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29880 on: March 27, 2024, 11:40:07 AM »
Biden wanted the immigration bill because it gave him more to process illegal immigrants, not curtail illegal immigration.   The Biden administration doesn't need any further law or funding to stop the disaster at the border.  They created the disaster all by themselves and can undue it.
A decade of Victory over Penn State.

All in since 1969

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71633
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29881 on: March 27, 2024, 11:40:26 AM »
I figure foreign aid of whatever type is fungible.  If we send aid to buy food, it means the country could divert monies it spent on food to buying weapons.


NorthernOhioBuckeye

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1101
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29882 on: March 27, 2024, 11:43:07 AM »
Then why did your man Trump order the bipartisan border deal shanked in the House?

Getting the border control agencies the manpower and equipment they need to do said border enforcement had wholesale support from all quarters in the Senate.

This is not the argument you want to make.
The so called "Bipartisan Border deal" did nothing to stop illegal immigration. The money allocated was simply to process those that came across the border faster allowing for yet more aliens to be processed. I wrote to my congressman and senators begging them to vote no on this prior to hearing anything Trump had to say about it. 

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71633
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29883 on: March 27, 2024, 11:51:04 AM »
"Bipartisan Border Deal: Key Details and Impact on US Immigration Law" (newsbusters.org)
"Bipartisan Border Deal: Key Details and Impact on US Immigration Law" (newsbusters.org)

I don't know if this is accurate, but it does feature some funding to stop illegal immigration and changes some laws.  Maybe it wouldn't do enough, but it appears to have been able to do something.

“This is a massive package, $118 billion. That includes $20 billion for border security, sweeping immigration restrictions, including shutting down the border when migrant encounters reach 5,000 a day and making it difficult to claim asylum in the U.S.,” she added.


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25281
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29884 on: March 27, 2024, 11:52:12 AM »
Trump is not "my man".

He is just so clearly an INFINITELY better alternative to the fantastically corrupt, incompetent, diaper shitting, weak ineffective senile President we have now. In my opinion.

Biden has had 3 PLUS FCKING YEARS to try and get something done on illegal immigration at the border. He's only doing it right now because the election is in less than 8 months and he's way down in all the polls and illegal immigration is one of the top 2 priorities for virtually every American voter according to most polling. So spare me.

And it's quite obvious why the House shanked the deal. The Republicans don't want to give Biden any perceived "W's" before the election and they want him out. Both sides are assholes for this. Biden should've done something day one on the border instead of let it fester into the disaster it is. And the Republicans should've worked with him right now to get something done for America.
There was other garbage tied to the deal that many didn't like.

They don't do deals. There is always shit attached to any piece of legislation - and both sides do it.

Drives me nuts.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71633
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29885 on: March 27, 2024, 11:52:53 AM »
I'd note AOC was critical of the bill, somewhat vaguely.

AOC says bipartisan immigration bill would contribute to ‘worsening border crisis’ | The Independent (the-independent.com)

“It also sets a very dangerous precedent to give Republicans everything they want on the border in exchange for temporary funds for Ukraine and Israel,” Ms Ocasio-Cortez said.
Ms Ocasio-Cortez isn’t the only Democrat coming out against the bill, standing in opposition to the Biden administration’s approval of the legislation.

Senator Alex Padilla of California, one of three Mexican-American Senators, criticised the fact that no Latino Democrats were included in the process.
“I think it was a missed opportunity to have some more thoughtful perspectives at the table,” he told The Independent. “So, I’m not surprised at the result.”



betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12224
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29886 on: March 27, 2024, 11:57:22 AM »
I don't blame you because the money on BOTH sides of the aisle tell you this all the time. They even buy studies that purport to "prove" it, but this is wildly untrue.

The welfare state and benefits like Social Security and Medicare make nearly any additions to the pool of recipients a net negative for us all economically.

Social Security and Medicare are substantially underwater. Ignore immigrants for a moment and just consider the economics of those programs for people born here:
  • Social Security charges 6.2% of your wages.
  • Medicare charges 1.45% of your wages.
  • If you are self-employed you pay double that.
  • If you work for someone else they pay the other half.
Thus, the total collected by the systems is 12.4% of earnings for Social Security and 2.9% of earnings for Medicare.

The two programs are theoretically separate but in practice they function together so, in total the Federal Government collects 15.3% of earned income for Social Security and Medicare.

As already mentioned both programs are massively underwater so that 15.3% is nowhere close to sufficient. This is despite the fact that each American pays it from their very first day flipping burgers at McDonald's in their teens until their very last day passing out carts at Wal-Mart in their old age (McDonald's and Wal-Mart are merely examples, the point is that Americans pay $1.53 of every $10 they earn from cradle to grave into SS/Medicare).


Since both systems are drowning in red ink we know that the average American isn't paying enough into the systems to cover their own costs.

Now back to immigrants:
Since we already know that the average American is a net drain in SS/Medicare, we also know that adding additional average Americans can only make those problems worse. You can't lose money on each person and make it up on volume, math doesn't work that way.

In theory we could benefit from high earning immigrants so long as their earnings are sufficient but there are additional problems spawned by immigration. The first is age. Even if SS/Medicare had some combination of higher rates or lower benefits such that the average American did pay for themselves, the numbers would still only work for immigrants who came here right at the start of their working lives. Anybody older than that couldn't possibly catch up without earnings way above average.

A prospective immigrant in their early 20's who has a job lined up with a six figure salary *MIGHT* pay for themselves but all other immigrants both legal AND illegal are a net drain on the economy. Anybody who tells you otherwise is either ignorant, lying, or a shill working for the Koch brothers or some similar person or entity.
Wow, that sounds terrible. And we let Americans have CHILDREN adding more burden to this system? 

I heard about a country with a one-child policy... Perhaps we should try that. 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25281
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29887 on: March 27, 2024, 12:00:14 PM »
Wow, that sounds terrible. And we let Americans have CHILDREN adding more burden to this system?

I heard about a country with a one-child policy... Perhaps we should try that.
I think they did away with that policy. They have an aging population as a result.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71633
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29888 on: March 27, 2024, 12:03:34 PM »
Various items I've read suggest immigration, even illegal, is a net plus for our economy.  I realize they may well be false, I can't tell.  I think more legal immigrants would help our SS situation.  Bear in mind your SS benefits relate to how much you paid into the system over 35 years.  If you live longer, you do get back more than you put in of course.  

Japan has a MAJOR population crisis, they average 1.3 kids per couple, and the population is declining, and they basically don't allow immigration to any extent.  It is one factor that is limiting their economy.  My impression of Japan vicariously is that they are a declining country, not doing well at all.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12224
  • Liked:
Re: In other news ...
« Reply #29889 on: March 27, 2024, 12:12:11 PM »
I think they did away with that policy. They have an aging population as a result.
Yeah, they did away with that policy. 

And as you and CD point out, while medina thinks people are a net drain on an economy, failing to replace those people certainly seems to be a... Much worse drain on an economy. 

I was being flippant because I wanted to express the opposite position (more workers is a good thing for an economy) but didn't have the time to go into a longer economic argument. 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.