header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups

 (Read 4279 times)

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22875
  • Liked:
Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« on: December 11, 2019, 01:14:47 PM »
Once again, time for that thread that nobody but me cares about!  The thread of potential bowl lineups under different configuration.

First, my ideal setup, which checks all the boxes for me, while acknowledging we aren't going backwards.  Granted it also involves a bowl reduction, which isn't happening.  It's 20 bowls, divided into 5 tiers of 4 bowls, with the top tier doubling as an unseeded playoff.  Unseeded inasmuch as the traditional bowl slots are maintained, independent of seeding.  Winners advance the a seeded semifinal on campus, with a neutral site championship.

Each tier consists of the the top available team from each P5 conference, 2 at larges, and 1 Go5 champion.  Teams are actually selected in merit owner, not eyeball order, and the bowls move from bottom tier up as you progress.

This (i) preserves traditional bowls; (ii) restores the greatness of NYD; (iii) makes bowl eligibility something worthwhile; (iv) adds at least some value to tacking on wins 7, 8, and 10, etc, as opposed to now; (v) makes the Group of 5 CCGs more interesting as play ins to a bowl, like the mid-major conference tourneys in basketball.

So, without further ado...

DECEMBER 24
MUSIC CITYIndiana (8-4) vs. Mississippi State (6-6)
COPPERTexas (7-5) vs. Texas A&M (7-5)
.
DECEMBER 25
POTATOMiami(Ohio) (8-5) vs. Washington (7-5)
HAWAIIWake Forest (8-4) vs. California (7-5)
.
DECEMBER 26
INDEPENDENCE#23 Navy (9-2) vs. Florida Atlantic (10-3)
LAS VEGASArizona State (7-5) vs. Tennessee (7-5)
.
DECEMBER 27
TANGERINE#18 MINNESOTA (10-2) vs. Louisville (7-5)
ALAMO#21 Cincinnati (10-3) vs. Iowa State (7-5)
.
DECEMBER 28
LIBERTY#15 Notre Dame (10-2) vs. #20 Appalachian State (12-1)
HOLIDAY#22 USC (11-2) vs. Kansas State (8-4)
.
DECEMBER 30
GATOR#16 IOWA (9-3) vs. Virginia Tech (8-4)
HALL OF FAME#13 Alabama (10-2) vs. #14 MICHIGAN (9-3)
.
DECEMBER 31
SUN#11 Utah (11-2) vs. #19 Boise State (12-1)
PEACH#12 Auburn (9-3) vs. #24 Virginia (9-4)
.
JANUARY 1
COTTON#10 PENN STATE (10-2) vs. #25 Oklahoma State (8-4)
CITRUS#8 WISCONSIN (10-3) vs. #9 Florida (10-2)
ORANGE#3 Clemson (13-0) vs. #7 Baylor (11-2)
ROSE#2 OHIO STATE (13-0) vs. #6 Oregon (11-2)
SUGAR#1 LSU (13-0) vs. #17 Memphis (12-1)
FIESTA#4 Oklahoma (12-1) vs. #5 Georgia (11-2)


847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31224
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2019, 01:21:06 PM »
Can you move the Citrus to Lambeau, so as to not give Florida a home advantage?


(See, I care.)
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9368
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2019, 01:23:20 PM »
I like the flexibility and honestly think bowls need to mix up tie-ins a lot more. Need to get big ten teams to the Texas and Ca bowls more, less Florida. 

I also am pro more bowls as I enjoy a good nine-or 10-win win mid-major. Those always interest me more that 7-5 offs, but I get why that happens. Wouldn’t mind more major/mid-major mixing, but that’s life. 

Anyway, interesting look. 

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9368
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2019, 01:23:45 PM »
Can you move the Citrus to Lambeau, so as to not give Florida a home advantage?


(See, I care.)
The Lambowl?

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31224
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2019, 01:24:50 PM »
Works for me.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21823
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #5 on: December 11, 2019, 06:29:31 PM »
As if FL bowl games were just randomly placed there......




“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21823
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #6 on: December 11, 2019, 06:35:40 PM »
I think it's amazing that as recently as 1991, the ACC champion went to the Citrus Bowl.  
In the old system, we'd have a mess on our hands, as I think Clemson could have moved over to the Sugar to face LSU, you'd still have OSU out in Pasadena.  Another split NC, which is okay.  



I just hate the total unwillingness to have a floating "if necessary" game when there are still 2 unbeaten P5 teams.  OSU loses, fine, LSU-Clemson winner is the champ!  OSU wins?  They then play the winner of LSU-Clemson!  It would be the old system that would occasionally morph into a 3-team playoff of sorts.


Why is that such a big, fat NO?  You schedule the venue, you pay, say, half to whoever is standing in the way of it happening if it indeed doesn't happen, and play it if you need to.  It's so simple, it'll never happen.
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 21823
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #7 on: December 11, 2019, 07:04:19 PM »
I'd like few bowls.  A "bowl team" should mean inside the top 25-all year type of team.  
Orange (XII champ* vs At-large)
Sugar (SEC champ vs At-large)
Cotton (XII champ* vs At-large)
Rose (PAC champ vs B1G champ)
(*The XII champ gets to pick which one it wants, it doesn't get 2 "big" spots every year.  An OU champ would want to go to the Orange, while a Texas champ the Cotton...)

Fiesta (at-large vs at-large)
Citrus (SEC or ACC vs XII)
Gator (SEC or ACC vs B1G)
Holiday (PAC vs at-large)

If there's also a Liberty and/or Sun Bowl(s), that's okay.  But no need really.
I do wish there were more this conference or that conference to the tie-ins.  Avoid too much repetition naturally.  
------------------
So this year, the above would be...
Orange - OU vs Georgia
Sugar - LSU vs Wisconsin
Cotton - Baylor vs Auburn
Rose - Oregon vs Ohio St
.
Fiesta - Florida vs Penn St
Citrus - Alabama vs Okie St
Gator - Virginia vs Michigan
Holiday - Utah vs Notre Dame
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 83108
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #8 on: December 11, 2019, 07:47:25 PM »
UGA has never played in the Fiesta Bowl.

I think they have played in every other bowl except some obscure ones like the Pinstripe or the Pouhlan Weedeater  or the Oil Bowl.

There was such a thing once.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31224
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #9 on: December 11, 2019, 08:15:15 PM »
I'd like to see UW in the Fiesta.

I'd also like to see the Music City step up and be a NYD6 over the Cotton.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 22875
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #10 on: December 11, 2019, 09:14:20 PM »
I think it's amazing that as recently as 1991, the ACC champion went to the Citrus Bowl. 
Didn't Georgia Tech win their co-NC by beating a fairly meh (like 8-4?) Nebraska team?

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9368
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #11 on: December 11, 2019, 09:14:42 PM »
I'd like few bowls.  A "bowl team" should mean inside the top 25-all year type of team. 
Orange (XII champ* vs At-large)
Sugar (SEC champ vs At-large)
Cotton (XII champ* vs At-large)
Rose (PAC champ vs B1G champ)
(*The XII champ gets to pick which one it wants, it doesn't get 2 "big" spots every year.  An OU champ would want to go to the Orange, while a Texas champ the Cotton...)

Fiesta (at-large vs at-large)
Citrus (SEC or ACC vs XII)
Gator (SEC or ACC vs B1G)
Holiday (PAC vs at-large)

If there's also a Liberty and/or Sun Bowl(s), that's okay.  But no need really.
I do wish there were more this conference or that conference to the tie-ins.  Avoid too much repetition naturally. 
------------------
So this year, the above would be...
Orange - OU vs Georgia
Sugar - LSU vs Wisconsin
Cotton - Baylor vs Auburn
Rose - Oregon vs Ohio St
.
Fiesta - Florida vs Penn St
Citrus - Alabama vs Okie St
Gator - Virginia vs Michigan
Holiday - Utah vs Notre Dame

Shrug, I like more football. If I get to watch some 9-10 win teams play more football. I'll take that please and thank you. 

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9368
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #12 on: December 11, 2019, 09:16:08 PM »
Didn't Georgia Tech win their co-NC by beating a fairly meh (like 8-4?) Nebraska team?
9-2 coming in. They started 8-0 and got to No. 3 and then lost to Colorado and Oklahoma across the last three games.

Top of the ACC wasn't bad that year, also beat bad UGA and mediocre South Carolina. 

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12101
  • Liked:
Re: Hypothetical Bowl Lineups
« Reply #13 on: December 11, 2019, 09:37:44 PM »
I think it's amazing that as recently as 1991, the ACC champion went to the Citrus Bowl. 
In the old system, we'd have a mess on our hands, as I think Clemson could have moved over to the Sugar to face LSU, you'd still have OSU out in Pasadena.  Another split NC, which is okay. 



I just hate the total unwillingness to have a floating "if necessary" game when there are still 2 unbeaten P5 teams.  OSU loses, fine, LSU-Clemson winner is the champ!  OSU wins?  They then play the winner of LSU-Clemson!  It would be the old system that would occasionally morph into a 3-team playoff of sorts.


Why is that such a big, fat NO?  You schedule the venue, you pay, say, half to whoever is standing in the way of it happening if it indeed doesn't happen, and play it if you need to.  It's so simple, it'll never happen.
So it should be based entirely on their win-loss record?

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.