SCROLL DOWN TO HELP WITH ALL-TIME TEAMS BY POSITION - FIRST IS WISCONSIN QB
Say you're playing a football board game and you get the All-Time Michigan team set.
What sounds better:
a - all of your RBs and WRs are all-time greats, all with great stats, so that their game outcomes will all be pretty equal, OR
.
b - it's more tiered, so that you have an all-time great 1st-teamer, then an all-time great backup who had fewer carries or catches? So for WRs, you'd have 1 from the group of all-time greats that had 100+ catches, then you'd have 1 from the next group that had 80-100 catches, and so forth.
.
Basically I'm torn between just full-on all-time great players vs creating a team of all-time greats, but with realistic ratios of performance that would mimic a normal team.
.
I'm leaning towards A, but I wanted some opinions.