header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down
Author

Topic: FCS Teams no longer prohibited

 (Read 8938 times)

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #14 on: July 26, 2017, 01:45:22 PM »
What I see happening is that if/when B1G schools started adding FCS games, the MAC schools will tone down the demand for a return game and just take the guarantee. They will probably come begging for it, to be honest. They've priced themselves out.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 12140
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #15 on: July 26, 2017, 02:39:41 PM »
Quote from: 847badgerfan on July 26, 2017, 01:45:22 PM
What I see happening is that if/when B1G schools started adding FCS games, the MAC schools will tone down the demand for a return game and just take the guarantee. They will probably come begging for it, to be honest. They've priced themselves out.

I hope that's the case. While I know the paycheck games are good for the FCS, and I understand why the B1G made the change the way they did (teams want 7 home games every year), I don't like playing FCS teams. Even if they're the only teams Purdue can reliably beat any more, I still think they devalue our schedules in general.
Logged

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20280
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #16 on: July 26, 2017, 02:41:25 PM »
Quote from: bwarbiany on July 26, 2017, 02:39:41 PM
I hope that's the case. While I know the paycheck games are good for the FCS, and I understand why the B1G made the change the way they did (teams want 7 home games every year), I don't like playing FCS teams. Even if they're the only teams Purdue can reliably beat any more, I still think they devalue our schedules in general.
It's amazing how quickly it devolved.  I remember UM being mocked for playing EMU, and that was just like 2000ish.  The floor went from something above MAC to MAC to FCS in like 5 years.
Logged

Hawkinole

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2218
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #17 on: July 26, 2017, 03:23:01 PM »
The reason given by Delaney for this change in policy is that it became difficult to find a team to schedule.

He didn't say it was because MAC schools were holding the Big Ten for ransom, but the FCS schools have always done so.

I think it is good for the State of Iowa that UNI play Iowa once every 4-years. It keeps the money in-state. And it is quite often a competitive game. UNI is no slouch. Ask Wisconsin.
Logged

MichiFan87

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 796
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #18 on: July 26, 2017, 03:45:42 PM »
Fortunately, this is irrelevant for Michigan (save your App State jokes), which has had recent and/or up-coming guarantee games against Colorado, BYU, Oregon State, UCF, Cincinnati, Hawaii, Air Force, Army, SMU, San Diego State, and UNLV, in addition to a few MAC/CUSA teams, and I expect that to continue.

Obviously, most schools don't have what I call scheduling leverage, but Ohio State and a few other power programs, have scheduled similarly, to their credit.
Logged
“When your team is winning, be ready to be tough, because winning can make you soft. On the other hand, when your team is losing, stick by them. Keep believing”
― Bo Schembechler

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 11230
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #19 on: July 26, 2017, 10:17:26 PM »

 :88:



 :57:
Logged
1919, 20, 21, 28, 29, 31, 34, 35, 36, 37, 42, 44
WWH: 1952, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65, 67, 68, 70, 72, 74, 75
1979, 81, 82, 84, 87, 94, 98
2001, 02, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19

GopherRock

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 2421
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #20 on: July 26, 2017, 11:22:12 PM »
Boo this move. 1-AA tomato cans need to stay where they belong, down in 1-AA.
Logged

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20280
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #21 on: July 26, 2017, 11:28:05 PM »
If you made me Big Ten czar, I'd go to a 10 game conference schedule, and allow every team to play one Group of 5 game and one P5 game, no FCS.

Also no Friday games, but that's a different issue.
Logged

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25061
  • Liked:
Re: FCS Teams no longer prohibited
« Reply #22 on: July 27, 2017, 07:37:01 AM »
If I were the NCAA Czar, I'd have 6 conferences with 11 schools, and every conference would play 10 games. There would be 3 OOC games - 2 of which would be against P6 schools and one at the pleasure of each school.
Logged
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
WeatherPROOF Sign Single Sided

Custom Mahogany Shadow Box