header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Electric Vehicle News Items

 (Read 239855 times)

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 45432
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2254 on: November 27, 2024, 09:19:02 PM »
The British government's plans to push zero emission vehicles (ZEV) are hurting the industry. This was admitted by Enterprise Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, who this week said he was "profoundly concerned" about the harmful effects of the plan to eliminate the production of new gasoline and diesel vehicles.

Rather than a hard stop to zero, Reynolds promised a shift of gears. He announced he would open consultations to design "a better way forward" to arrive at the same goal.

The Conservatives are not satisfied either. In a heated exchange in parliament on Wednesday, Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the opposition's Kemi Badenoch blamed each other for the failures of green policies: "Does the prime minister stand by his promise to ban the sale of petrol cars by 2030 even if more jobs will be lost?" asked Badenoch, to which Starmer responded by reminding him that the mandates "were actually introduced by the last government [which was Conservative]."

The mandate sets a percentage of zero-emission vehicles that manufacturers must sell. Those who do not comply must pay a penalty. The percentage scales year by year, this year being 22% of total sales and reaching 80% by 2030. The current government, however, had pledged to push up the total ban on gasoline cars from 2035 to 2030.


The debate was stoked after Stellantis announced that one of its subsidiaries, Vauxhall, would close a van factory, putting 1,100 jobs at risk. Although it announced plans to open another factory, it maintained that the closure had occurred "within the context of the U.K.’s ZEV Mandate," which it called "stringent."

The announcement came days after Ford reported that it will cut 800 jobs over the next three years to reduce production of electric cars in the United Kingdom alone, and it will eliminate 4,000 in Europe. In announcing the cuts, the automaker argued that it had suffered "significant losses in recent years," noting: "The industry shift to electrified vehicles and new competition has been highly disruptive."

Ford and other major industry players speak of a mismatch between state-mandated obligations and consumer demand. According to U.K. media outlet The Telegraph, so far this year, only 18% of new cars sold have been electric. Many manufacturers, moreover, have fallen below the production target.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2255 on: November 28, 2024, 07:33:03 AM »
These mandates are kind of amusing, to me.  Not amusing to car companies.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 31042
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2256 on: November 28, 2024, 07:43:09 AM »
Mandates of any sort are not amusing.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2257 on: November 28, 2024, 07:54:57 AM »
They are "kind of amusing" to me because reality is so far off said mandates, and unpopular mandates end up being changed.

I agree with some mandates.  I also agree that a lot of them are "kind of amusing" and silly, counter to human nature.

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2259 on: December 19, 2024, 03:20:59 PM »
I recently got my first taste of what I believe was a hybrid.  I think it was probably a hybrid, I don't know.  I rented it, they didn't tell me, and I didn't ask.  I noticed that the engine throttled down to basically nothing at stops and in park.  It audibly kicked back up when I let off the brake and accelerated.  I also noticed at the pump that the SUV (I believe it was a Mazda CX-90) only took about 13 gallons of fuel, about the same as my small sedan whose tank is usually far smaller than SUVs, yet it traveled as far as I would've expected for an SUV that takes 25 or 30 gallons.  I also noticed the engine sort of shutting down when I hit cruise control.  It was all new to me, and my guess it it was a hybrid.

The problem was that the engine kicking back in with full force was not an immediate thing.  Close, but not quite, and it was a bit jerky to boot.  So at a red light, I didn't get the smooth take-off I'm used to with gas engines.  Also, if I was cruising along and decided to pass someone, it took it a minute to use its full strength, so to speak, to perk up enough to get around them. 

I didn't really care for how it handled, and the jerkiness of the engine shutting "on" and "off" made me wonder how healthy it all was for said engine.  (On and off are probably not the right terms for that, but whatevs.)  Less gas cost was nice, but if I have a choice I doubt I'd buy something like that.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2260 on: December 19, 2024, 03:25:21 PM »
Some regular cars have start-stop which can be jerky.  They are not hybrids.

Our car is a hybrid and it’s hard to tell when the enigine cuts off.  

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2261 on: December 19, 2024, 03:29:26 PM »
Maybe that's what I had.  But I wonder how it "stopped" when I was zooming down the highway at 75 mph.  My vehicles have always continued roaring audibly at top speed.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2262 on: December 19, 2024, 03:36:47 PM »
The CX90 is a mild hybrid.  It may have shut down its engine briefly at 75mph.  Ours does not.

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14495
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2263 on: December 19, 2024, 03:42:05 PM »
I've had that start/stop on rental cars before. It never really bothered me. I wouldn't mind having it on my car as it would be a nice little gas saver, but alas it wasn't available.

My wife used to have it when she was driving the 3-series BMW, and she turned it off because she didn't like it. 

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2264 on: December 19, 2024, 04:22:35 PM »
I'd probably get used to the feel of it.  My bigger issue was feeling like surely it can't be good for the engine long term.  That kind of jerking I was feeling is usually something that would make me think I'm about to have to pay a mechanic a bunch of money.  I assume there's data on that kind of thing, and I'm not much of a mechanic, so I don't exactly have an informed opinion.  I do know that in general, vibrations are not good on machines long term.  My little car has been going since I bought it in 2008.  I wouldn't feel good about the engine in that Mazda making it anywhere near that long.  

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 82482
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2265 on: December 19, 2024, 04:28:11 PM »
Usually start stop can be turned off. 

MikeDeTiger

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Posts: 4317
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2266 on: December 19, 2024, 04:47:28 PM »
Then I guess you'd be stuck with the pretty limited range of an SUV with a 13-14 gallon gas tank.  

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 14495
  • Liked:
Re: Electric Vehicle News Items
« Reply #2267 on: December 19, 2024, 05:13:19 PM »
My bigger issue was feeling like surely it can't be good for the engine long term.  That kind of jerking I was feeling is usually something that would make me think I'm about to have to pay a mechanic a bunch of money.  I assume there's data on that kind of thing, and I'm not much of a mechanic, so I don't exactly have an informed opinion.  I do know that in general, vibrations are not good on machines long term.
Yeah, and I was raised to think that constant start/stop and cranking the engine would wear things out faster than not doing so... Have to feel like it would be hell on the starter, and the engine. 

But... I also know how the pace of engineering goes, and what was true when I was in my teens and early 20s are probably now "solved problems".  

I've noticed when I've driven rentals with the feature that it doesn't do it until the engine is fully warmed up, as it's probably "cold starts" that are more wear-and-tear on the engine than starting when hot. And if you're stop/start enough that it might be draining the battery it'll stop doing it for a while. 

I assume the engineering and reliability teams at these companies have data that says it's ok. And as someone who deals with high-precision electromechanical systems and has spent a good portion of my career supporting customers when things are failing, there's no "well it doesn't fail until 100K miles so it doesn't matter for warranty purposes"... Because everything that is more unreliable at >100K miles is also more unreliable at every mileage, and statistically they're going to have to deal with some of those failures within warranty. It's possible that they factor this in as a cost of doing business to hit CAFE standards and it's a reliability/cost trade-off, of course. But I'm more inclined to think that the designers think the failure rate is low enough to not be a concern. 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.