Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

My eyeballs say Cam Newton.  A one man wrecking crew.

And as MDOT said above --- who else was on that team? 

Maybe Michael Dyer as RB? 

I mean, Dyer was a 5-star top-15 recruit who ran for 1,000 yards as a true freshman in the SEC and then was first-team All-SEC the next year. The other RB was a 4.34 40 guy who ran for 800 yards as part of that killer scheme. Couple of nice linemen. But year, it was all him. 

I think what's interesting with the group above is almost every one had a season that is superlative in a certain way. So it leaves it up to the picker to decide what a run/pass QB season means. Cam had the best/most impactful season for a modern guy who ran the hell out of the ball. Among this set, I think he almost assuredly had the best rushing season. But I think his passing season was a few steps below great. Just because of offensive construction/general volume/etc., I think his passing season was in the lower echelon of the group and I dinged him accordingly. 

But yeah, if we're talking best/most impactful season, yeah, Cam for sure. 

I'm shocked Ray Goff is not on this list.

I was shocked to learn he was an awesome option QB.  

But he's not on here because his ass only had 29 pass attempts for the season

 Wow, he was 7th in Heisman voting, I didn't know that.

That's what I'm saying!
Before creating those UGA teams for my game, all I knew of him was as the clown HC in the 90s.  

Here's how putrid passing was in the 70s:
UGA's "good passing QB" Matt Robinson's line:  44% comp, 7 TD, 6 INT, 121 rating

The whole conference was run-first, run-next into the 90s.  UGA never passed much until Zeier.  
Spurrier dragged the conference kicking and screaming into the modern age.

Yes, every school had their talented arm that got more attempts.  They all pretty much stunk.  

Florida had John Reaves, who famously threw 9 INTs in a game.  He was the nation's all-time leading passer, thanks to the Gator Flop.  But he had more INTs than TDs and a 53.5% comp.  115 rating.  Okay for back then, but not good in a vacuum.

Hell, Pat Sullivan won a Heisman at Auburn, but only had a 55% comp and 135 career rating.  Again, I'm fully aware that it was a different era and context, but these coaches rewarding arm talent back in the day hampered their teams with pretty bad results.

Archie Manning had more INTs than TDs and simply was not a good passer.  But boy, could he scramble!  

For the B1G, there's even less high-volume passers going back in time.  Purdue's Mike Phipps was the career leader in attempts for around a decade, and basically had a 1:1 TD:INT ratio and 120 pass rating.