header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18]   Go Down
Author

Topic: CRISPR and AI

 (Read 21088 times)

MikeDeTiger

  • Team Captain
  • *******
  • Posts: 6220
  • Liked:
Re: CRISPR and AI
« Reply #238 on: Today at 12:01:21 PM »
Quote from: SFBadger96 on Today at 11:36:45 AM
At this point, I might be a little disappointed if a candidate didn't have a working knowledge of how to use AI to improve their practice. That might include taking a crack at a letter, even if it is just proof reading it.

Also, quick reminder to all you out there, your AI prompts aren't legally privileged, even if you're asking AI for legal advice. Having the opposition produce their client's AI logs is a promising area for discovery in litigation...

That would be a mistake for any legal team to look into my AI prompts.  30 seconds into looking over prompts and outputs about coding and technical problems and we'd likely have the first case of mass death by boredom.  
Logged

iahawk15

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 757
  • Liked:
Re: CRISPR and AI
« Reply #239 on: Today at 12:09:16 PM »
Quote from: SFBadger96 on Today at 11:36:45 AM
Also, quick reminder to all you out there, your AI prompts aren't legally privileged, even if you're asking AI for legal advice. Having the opposition produce their client's AI logs is a promising area for discovery in litigation...
Would this process rely on subpoenas to OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, etc? Or would opposition counsel be compelled to manually compile them? Is there a different process?
Logged

SFBadger96

  • All Star
  • ******
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 2754
  • Liked:
Re: CRISPR and AI
« Reply #240 on: Today at 12:21:45 PM »
They keep logs for users that the users have access to. Typically this would be a collection by the litigant (often using a third-party vendor, not "self collection"), but I can imagine a world in which a subpoena is sent.
Logged

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 89404
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: CRISPR and AI
« Reply #241 on: Today at 12:28:04 PM »
I asked AI if this is true and got this:

Courts view AI platforms as third parties, meaning communications are generally not protected by attorney-client privilege or work-product doctrine and may be discoverable. AI-generated content can be used as evidence of intent.
Logged

bayareabadger

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 10279
  • Liked:
Re: CRISPR and AI
« Reply #242 on: Today at 01:12:14 PM »
Quote from: SFBadger96 on Today at 11:36:45 AM
At this point, I might be a little disappointed if a candidate didn't have a working knowledge of how to use AI to improve their practice. That might include taking a crack at a letter, even if it is just proof reading it.

Also, quick reminder to all you out there, your AI prompts aren't legally privileged, even if you're asking AI for legal advice. Having the opposition produce their client's AI logs is a promising area for discovery in litigation...
What are some ways lawyers have been getting use out of them? 
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.
CFB51 Subscription
Subscribe

Custom Candied Sign