header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: CFP Thread

 (Read 2485 times)

Brutus Buckeye

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 13475
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #336 on: Today at 09:15:59 AM »


You think they'd lose to Wisconsin? :o

MaximumSam

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 381
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #337 on: Today at 09:21:10 AM »
They are not in the same class.

Why pretend they are?

JMU would finish dead last in the SEC or B1G.

Tulane lost to Ole Miss twice this year, to the tune of 86-20.

Enough with the charity already.
JMU would smoke a few teams in both conferences. But they won't their conference, and I hate we have to have charity for all the also rans who didn't.

End the charity!

medinabuckeye1

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 11630
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #338 on: Today at 09:31:08 AM »
JMU would smoke a few teams in both conferences. But they won't their conference, and I hate we have to have charity for all the also rans who didn't.

End the charity!
They won a crap conference. They are a tallest midget. Are you seriously unaware of this or are you being purposely obtuse?

Lots of D2, D3, and HS teams also "won their conference". They aren't included because those conferences aren't on the same level. Neither are whatever crap conferences Tulane and JMU won. Everyone knows this except apparently you since you keep falling back on this "they won their conference" argument while failing to acknowledge that their conference sucks.

MaximumSam

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 381
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #339 on: Today at 09:33:27 AM »
They won a crap conference. They are a tallest midget. Are you seriously unaware of this or are you being purposely obtuse?

Lots of D2, D3, and HS teams also "won their conference". They aren't included because those conferences aren't on the same level. Neither are whatever crap conferences Tulane and JMU won. Everyone knows this except apparently you since you keep falling back on this "they won their conference" argument while failing to acknowledge that their conference sucks.
It doesn't matter if their conference sucks. What matters is they won. All the losers can apply to JMU's conference next year. 

Stop Defending Losers

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 34598
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #340 on: Today at 09:34:04 AM »

You think they'd lose to Wisconsin? :o

Yes.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 22420
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #341 on: Today at 09:38:53 AM »
It doesn't matter if their conference sucks. What matters is they won. All the losers can apply to JMU's conference next year.

Stop Defending Losers
Division II teams sam why extend the already too long season with participation trophies? Just because Cignetti rose from there doesn't automatically mean they get a chair at the big boy table,Texas and ND should have been in not JMU & OD. And ND needs to sack up and join a conference
"It is better to have died a young boy than to fumble the football" - John Heisman

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25436
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #342 on: Today at 10:12:38 AM »
Oklahoma and Alabama would both slaughter JMU, gimme a break.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 34598
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #343 on: Today at 10:17:16 AM »
The whole thing just sucks.

I miss the 1990's.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

betarhoalphadelta

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 16049
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #344 on: Today at 10:26:11 AM »
You realize all this kvetching is exactly the evidence TPTB will use to justify why they need to expand to 16, right? 

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 34598
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #345 on: Today at 10:39:16 AM »
Expand it to 64, with 4 more play-in games. 

Or just F it and everyone gets a trophy.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

MaximumSam

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 381
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #346 on: Today at 10:42:27 AM »
You realize all this kvetching is exactly the evidence TPTB will use to justify why they need to expand to 16, right?
Why does college football let television run everyth...AHHH I AM NOT AS ENTERTAINED AS I COULD BE RIGHT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 22420
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #347 on: Today at 10:55:29 AM »
I'm sure JMU V. OD just might be entertaining,just stay in their lane
"It is better to have died a young boy than to fumble the football" - John Heisman

MaximumSam

  • Red Shirt
  • ***
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 381
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #348 on: Today at 11:26:42 AM »
I'm sure JMU V. OD just might be entertaining,just stay in their lane
JMU beat ODU 63-27

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 9927
  • Liked:
Re: CFP Thread
« Reply #349 on: Today at 11:29:01 AM »
Seemed mostly fine. 

And if I’ve learned something from 20+ years, watching the sport, ain’t a fix in the world for people‘s desire to complain about something in this game. 

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.