header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1

 (Read 3249 times)

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20280
  • Liked:
CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« on: January 08, 2018, 08:35:12 AM »
FIRST TEAM
QBJ.T. BarrettOhio State
RBSaquon BarkleyPenn State
RBJonathan TaylorWisconsin
WRD.J. MooreMaryland
WRSimmie CobbsIndiana
TEMike GeseckiPenn State
TJamarco JonesOhio State
GBeau BenzschawelWisconsin
CBilly PriceOhio State
GMichael JordanOhio State
TDavid EdwardsWisconsin
-
DLMaurice HurstMichigan
DLNick BosaOhio State
DLTyquan LewisOhio State
DLRashan GaryMichigan
LB
LB
LB
DB
DB
DB
DB
-
K
P
RET
-
SECOND TEAM
QBTrace McSorleyPenn State
RBJ.K. DobbinsOhio State
RBJustin JacksonNorthwestern
WRStanley MorganNebraska
WRJ.D. SpielmanNebraska
TETroy FumagalliWisconsin
TMichael DieterWisconsin
GBen BredesonMichigan
CBrian AllenMichigan State
GSean WelshIowa
TMason ColeMichigan
-
DLChase WinovichMichigan
DLSam HubbardOhio State
DLAlec JamesWisconsin
DL
LB
LB
LB
DB
DB
DB
DB

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25062
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #1 on: January 08, 2018, 10:20:42 AM »
I went with one of the All-Americans (the red one) but either one of those should be 1 and/or 2 here.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

grillrat

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 590
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #2 on: January 08, 2018, 10:44:23 AM »
Nope.

I have no idea how you qualify these entries ELA, but there is absolutely no reason that TJ Edwards should be on this list before any of Ja'Whaun Bentley, TJ McCollum, or Markus Bailey.  I could even make a pretty solid argument for Bailey over Tegray Scales.

(and yes, I know he's an All-Big Ten Pick by the media, that still doesn't make it right)

If you want to argue that Purdue's defensive line was not good enough to not even get a mention in the All-Big-Ten votes, I think you're wrong, but you at least have a decent argument.  There is no argument for excluding them from the linebacking group.

The Purdue linebackers in their last game held the Arizona rush offense, who was 4th in the nation and averaging over 300 yards a game, to 128 yards.  That was all because of Bentley, McCollum, and Bailey.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2018, 10:47:36 AM by grillrat »

ELA

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 20280
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #3 on: January 08, 2018, 11:05:05 AM »
I use the All-Big Ten teams, same as I always have.

grillrat

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 590
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2018, 12:19:33 PM »
In fairness, I owe you an apology.  I was mistaken, your 8th defensive line choices did actually include Gelen Robinson.

MrNubbz

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 17106
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2018, 01:16:57 PM »
Went with Jewel
Suburbia:Where they tear out the trees & then name streets after them.

iahawk15

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 648
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2018, 03:04:53 PM »
I'll take the Unanimous All-American, Jewell.

bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7848
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2018, 03:43:16 PM »
Nope.

I have no idea how you qualify these entries ELA, but there is absolutely no reason that TJ Edwards should be on this list before any of Ja'Whaun Bentley, TJ McCollum, or Markus Bailey.  I could even make a pretty solid argument for Bailey over Tegray Scales.

(and yes, I know he's an All-Big Ten Pick by the media, that still doesn't make it right)

If you want to argue that Purdue's defensive line was not good enough to not even get a mention in the All-Big-Ten votes, I think you're wrong, but you at least have a decent argument.  There is no argument for excluding them from the linebacking group.

The Purdue linebackers in their last game held the Arizona rush offense, who was 4th in the nation and averaging over 300 yards a game, to 128 yards.  That was all because of Bentley, McCollum, and Bailey.
“Absolutely no reason”
Break this down for me. No reason? Like at all? I mean, the coaches didn’t see fit to put any of them in the top 9 in the league, that seems like a reason. 
The case against Edwards would I guess be that he’s more of a coverage LB? Tackle numbers are pretty decent. TFL and sacks are low, but Bentley and McCollum are in that boat. 
The Purdue case really comes down to the fact Purdue’s Run defense was great at stopping the run on a down-to-down basis and OK at preventing big runs. The Boilers can’t claim a top defense in the big ten, or maybe in the top half of the conference. The sacks make Bailey the best award candidate, but it’s a pitch that’s beyond numbers. And I’m that case you need the defense to be very good, but Purdue’s is only very good in terms of one aspect (plus improvement I guess)

grillrat

  • Player
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 590
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #8 on: January 08, 2018, 05:06:18 PM »
“Absolutely no reason”
Break this down for me. No reason? Like at all? I mean, the coaches didn’t see fit to put any of them in the top 9 in the league, that seems like a reason.
The case against Edwards would I guess be that he’s more of a coverage LB? Tackle numbers are pretty decent. TFL and sacks are low, but Bentley and McCollum are in that boat.
The Purdue case really comes down to the fact Purdue’s Run defense was great at stopping the run on a down-to-down basis and OK at preventing big runs. The Boilers can’t claim a top defense in the big ten, or maybe in the top half of the conference. The sacks make Bailey the best award candidate, but it’s a pitch that’s beyond numbers. And I’m that case you need the defense to be very good, but Purdue’s is only very good in terms of one aspect (plus improvement I guess)
So, your whole argument is predicated on the overall team defense, and not individual performance?  That would make sense if this list were only OSU / PSU / WI / MI players, but the fact that Iowa and NW (which had relatively the same overall defensive ability) had representatives, but Purdue did not, kinda kills that.
If this list were about team defensive performance, Wisconsin wins.  No doubt in my mind.

But we are talking specifically about the linebackers.  The linebackers job is to defend to run, fill the gaps in the defensive line, throw occasional blitzes, and defend the pass in short yardage situations.  The fact that Purdue DB's and Safeties were crap and was the difference between Purdue being middle of the Big Ten defense and a top 3 defense, should not be considered as a reason that one LB is better than another.

Let's look at Edwards and Bentley.  You claim Edwards was more of a coverage LB....

Passes Broken Up:
Edwards - 7
Bentley - 3 (and Edwards played two more games)

That's not exactly glowing evidence that Edwards was spending significantly more time as a coverage option.  Maybe if you can find a "passes defended" statistic we can look a little more deeply into that one, but.....

Yes, he did have 4 interceptions, compared to Bentley's 1, but I can also throw in Bentley's two fumbles forced compared to Edwards 0 (and 2 less games) and that one's pretty much a wash.

All tackling statistical categories, Bentley wins.

Solo tackles 
Assisted tackles
Tackles for Loss

Sacks - Edwards 2, Bentley 1

(all with two less games)

Bailey was fairly comparable too if you want me to break down the numbers.  McCollum not so much, but he had injury issues and only played ten games, so you can't really argue about his stats (likely would have stolen stats from the others)

So, yeah.  Outside of including McCollum over Edwards, I'll stand by my statement.


bayareabadger

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 7848
  • Liked:
Re: CFB51 All-Big Ten Team - Linebacker #1
« Reply #9 on: January 09, 2018, 01:12:45 AM »
So, your whole argument is predicated on the overall team defense, and not individual performance?  That would make sense if this list were only OSU / PSU / WI / MI players, but the fact that Iowa and NW (which had relatively the same overall defensive ability) had representatives, but Purdue did not, kinda kills that.
If this list were about team defensive performance, Wisconsin wins.  No doubt in my mind.

But we are talking specifically about the linebackers.  The linebackers job is to defend to run, fill the gaps in the defensive line, throw occasional blitzes, and defend the pass in short yardage situations.  The fact that Purdue DB's and Safeties were crap and was the difference between Purdue being middle of the Big Ten defense and a top 3 defense, should not be considered as a reason that one LB is better than another.

Let's look at Edwards and Bentley.  You claim Edwards was more of a coverage LB....

Passes Broken Up:
Edwards - 7
Bentley - 3 (and Edwards played two more games)

That's not exactly glowing evidence that Edwards was spending significantly more time as a coverage option.  Maybe if you can find a "passes defended" statistic we can look a little more deeply into that one, but.....

Yes, he did have 4 interceptions, compared to Bentley's 1, but I can also throw in Bentley's two fumbles forced compared to Edwards 0 (and 2 less games) and that one's pretty much a wash.

All tackling statistical categories, Bentley wins.

Solo tackles
Assisted tackles
Tackles for Loss

Sacks - Edwards 2, Bentley 1

(all with two less games)

Bailey was fairly comparable too if you want me to break down the numbers.  McCollum not so much, but he had injury issues and only played ten games, so you can't really argue about his stats (likely would have stolen stats from the others)

So, yeah.  Outside of including McCollum over Edwards, I'll stand by my statement.


My whole argument is based on, what's the hook? When you're arguing the media and coaches missed the boat, I need some sort of thing to say, "wow, I didn't consider it." The three guys have solid enough statistics, but outside the one with seven sacks, no real huge play-making numbers. The tackles are fine, but blow no one away. 
So we might have to look at team stuff. As I can see it, I can find a couple really good advanced stats to use as hooks. Using one game seems like a tricky one, especially since I'd have to do a little film work to see how all three were used against that kind of offense. I dunno. I guess you're telling me it should be obvious these guys are among the league's best, and I'm asking, what is the reason I should believe that. 

(Edwards broke up or picked off more than twice as many passes a game as Bentley. Seems like it would mean something. Again, I wasn't saying there's no chance they're better than Edwards, but couldn't find ground to argue there was "absolutely no reason" those two should've jumped him. That absolutely thing makes me think there's something ironclad, and I'm asking, help me see what it is. My standard of proof isn't that high, it it's a wash isn't doing it for me)

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.