header pic

Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

The 'Old' CFN/Scout Crowd- Enjoy Civil discussion, game analytics, in depth player and coaching 'takes' and discussing topics surrounding the game. You can even have your own free board, all you have to do is ask!!!

Anyone is welcomed and encouraged to join our FREE site and to take part in our community- a community with you- the user, the fan, -and the person- will be protected from intrusive actions and with a clean place to interact.


Author

Topic: Bowl Games SOC

 (Read 43612 times)

OrangeAfroMan

  • Stats Porn
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 18847
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #644 on: January 02, 2019, 12:32:52 AM »
Because their hopes and dreams were not dashed in their previous game.  Why is this so hard to understand?
2018 teams eligible to not play motivated:
Michigan
Georgia





These teams were going to be in the NCCG or CFP, but lost their last game of the season, rendering their big goals moot.  Only two of them won in such a case.  This isn't some convoluted BS, based on Bama losing to Utah in 2008, it's a real, live thing.  It doesn't guarantee a loss in their bowl game, but it does guarantee these 21 year old kids have less to play for than they did the game before, and often times, this affects their play.  Period.

2 for 2 on it this year.  Small sample, ongoing, but piling up the evidence (outcomes).
“The Swamp is where Gators live.  We feel comfortable there, but we hope our opponents feel tentative. A swamp is hot and sticky and can be dangerous." - Steve Spurrier

TyphonInc

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Easily Amused
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #645 on: January 02, 2019, 02:04:16 AM »
Damn. SVP peeling the onions tonight. Gave a Tyler Trent a farewell; after Purdue beat OSU he promised Tyler a seat on his show, and ended tonight with an empty seat next to a Boiler helmet.

Drew4UTk

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 10165
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #646 on: January 02, 2019, 08:55:53 AM »
Damn. SVP peeling the onions tonight. Gave a Tyler Trent a farewell; after Purdue beat OSU he promised Tyler a seat on his show, and ended tonight with an empty seat next to a Boiler helmet.
dang man.... that kid was a testament to 'living' when you know the end is near, and begs the question why we don't 'live' ALL the time.  He inspired many with his pure spirit.  

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #647 on: January 02, 2019, 09:07:56 AM »
Minnie, UW, NU and Iowa were all underdogs, and all got wins. Purdue and MSU were dogs too. PSU, OSU and UM were favored. Overall a terrible performance by the East this year.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

TyphonInc

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Easily Amused
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #648 on: January 02, 2019, 10:05:15 AM »
Minnie, UW, NU and Iowa were all underdogs, and all got wins. Purdue and MSU were dogs too. PSU, OSU and UM were favored. Overall a terrible performance by the East this year.
PSU losing, still just boogles my brain. I didn't see the game and am assuming props need to be given to Kentucky.
A lot of feel good going to OSU right now, but I wonder if historians will bring up OSU didn't cover the spread.

Entropy

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Posts: 1432
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #649 on: January 02, 2019, 10:32:34 AM »
Power 5 Bowl results:

Big 12: 4-3; .571
B1G: 5-4; .556
SEC 6-5; .546
ACC: 5-5; .500
Pac-12: 3-4; .429


saw that on twitter.. if you believe bowl games are indications of conference strength, this would suggest CF had a lot more balance than you'd see or hear on ESPN.

utee94

  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 17672
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #650 on: January 02, 2019, 10:38:29 AM »
Settle down bevo
Probably not a good idea to put a yappy little dog right in front of him, dressed up in a red sweater no less...
I really enjoyed that game.  Georgia mounted a heck of a comeback when they could have packed it in.  Their running back is extremely talented.
Sam Ehlinger had a heck of a game, but I sure don't want to see him doing that with any regularity during the regular season next year.  


medinabuckeye1

  • Legend
  • ****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 8906
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #651 on: January 02, 2019, 10:52:31 AM »
not from AfroMan
Me either. I agree with @Orange Afro Man . UCF played one decent opponent this year and lost. 

Mdot21

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 14340
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #652 on: January 02, 2019, 11:08:05 AM »
2 for 2 on it this year.  Small sample, ongoing, but piling up the evidence (outcomes).
Good predictions. 
OSU demoralized Michigan with that beatdown in Columbus and then like 5 starters for Michigan just said man f this bowl I’m sitting out. 
Georgia had Bama beat, an SEC title in its hands and a trip to the playoff and then they crapped the bed and let the backup QB come in and lead the comeback win. Gotta be tough to turn around and get motivated to play a young hungry Texas team looking to prove itself by knocking off an SEC power. 
Give Georgia credit though, they didn’t quit like Michigan. They were asleep for 95% of the game but they didn’t just quit like Michigan did.

847badgerfan

  • Administrator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 25215
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #653 on: January 02, 2019, 11:24:49 AM »
You'd think after getting demoralized that the kids and coaches would have something to prove.
U RAH RAH! WIS CON SIN!

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1243
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #654 on: January 02, 2019, 11:30:01 AM »
Sometimes the matchup just isn't favorable. And sometimes the breaks don't go your way. And sometimes the ball starts rolling down the wrong hill and there's no stopping it. Blowouts happen. Ohio State is way better than Purdue--no one disputes that, right? Michigan is way better than the way it played against Florida.

(Says the Notre Dame fan trying to console himself...)

Cincydawg

  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Global Moderator
  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 71547
  • Oracle of Piedmont Park
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #655 on: January 02, 2019, 11:30:46 AM »
I don't think the demoralized thing is a good excuse at all.

Having some players not playing is an excuse I can accept, to the extent excuses matter at all.

A lot of the bowl games were close and could have gone either way.  PSU nearly beat UK, I'd call that one a tie, same with Iowa and MSU, and many others, in terms of team comparisons.

FearlessF

  • Hall of Fame
  • *****
  • Posts: 37524
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #656 on: January 02, 2019, 11:32:56 AM »
Me either. I agree with @Orange Afro Man . UCF played one decent opponent this year and lost.
I agree with this statement, but......
with the back up QB, they were not outclassed and run out of the stadium.  They had some game.
and they showed up to play.  Not all bowl teams did.
"Courage; Generosity; Fairness; Honor; In these are the true awards of manly sport."

SFBadger96

  • Starter
  • *****
  • Default Avatar
  • Posts: 1243
  • Liked:
Re: Bowl Games SOC
« Reply #657 on: January 02, 2019, 11:37:04 AM »
I don't think the demoralized thing is a good excuse at all.

Having some players not playing is an excuse I can accept, to the extent excuses matter at all.

A lot of the bowl games were close and could have gone either way.  PSU nearly beat UK, I'd call that one a tie, same with Iowa and MSU, and many others, in terms of team comparisons.

VERSUS

Give Georgia credit though, they didn’t quit like Michigan. They were asleep for 95% of the game but they didn’t just quit like Michigan did.

OR...

Sometimes the matchup just isn't favorable. And sometimes the breaks don't go your way. And sometimes the ball starts rolling down the wrong hill and there's no stopping it. Blowouts happen. Ohio State is way better than Purdue--no one disputes that, right? Michigan is way better than the way it played against Florida.
Difference between the fan of a team that had some dawg in the fight versus fans of teams that got smocked.

 

Support the Site!
Purchase of every item listed here DIRECTLY supports the site.