Perhaps the BEST B1G Forum anywhere, here at College Football Fan Site, CFB51!!!

“I’ve been outspoken that we need to have parity in the scheduling,” Moos said. “I know that at one point the traditional powerhouses were playing each other more to get that strength of schedule component really kind of directed and focused on the football playoff. But you look at the SEC, where they literally have terrible strength of schedule in most cases – only an eight-game conference schedule, etc. And still they’re putting somebody, sometimes two schools, in (the playoff) each year.”

The latter is something Frost has also been vocal about in the past, and continued to hit on this week.

He spent his final question of an hour-long session with print and TV media on Monday making the case why it’s important the SEC and ACC add another conference game each year.

“I think you have to absolutely have blinders on not to recognize the SEC and ACC are going to be over represented every year because they play eight while the Pac-12 and Big Ten beat themselves up and play extra games,” Frost said. “It’s inevitable if you play an extra conference game that half of your conference schools are going to have one more loss at the end of the year.

“It hurts your rankings. It hurts your preseason rankings for the next year because you had another loss the year before. It makes your games not count as much because you’re not playing ranked teams. Those things need to get balanced out.”

When it comes to controlling what you can control, Moos feels the athletic directors had “a very good dialogue” that had the support of the league commissioner Jim Delany in regards to future Big Ten scheduling.

I think an equal rotation is coming

the other part is the possibility of going back to 8 conference games if the SEC and ACC refuse to go to 9.

I think an equal rotation is coming

the other part is the possibility of going back to 8 conference games if the SEC and ACC refuse to go to 9.

We are closer to 10 conference games, than 8. My opinion is worth fairly close to about 5¢.

I have read it and despise it as much as the term "pod"

That's ok with me and probably Frost and Moos, as long as the SEC and ACC play 10.
the rub is playing fewer conference games and thus having a better chance of putting two teams into the 4 or 8-team playoff

Lots of tricks the SEC has used to strengthen its perception.  Fewer conference games with that extra one being played against an FCS team by much of the league, results in the teams within the conference having fewer guaranteed losses.  That, combined with the timing of where the SEC typically schedules its "Cupcake Week" which is late in the season, giving the SEC teams a slam-dunk win while teams in other conferences are playing much tougher in-conference games, allows all the SEC teams to artificially move up the stack when the rankings come out.
In short, I think it's highly unlikely any conference is going to 10 conference games, while the SEC is playing only 8.  It would only exacerbate the problems.

It's kind of odd that the SEC gets so much flak for playing 8 games. It's not like they used to play nine, and then dialed it back in order to bolster their records. 

Everyone played 8 across the board. The SEC shouldn't have to start playing 9 Conference games just because a few other conferences randomly thought that it would be a good idea. 

I'd speculate that if the Pac 12 went to ten Conference games, it would most likely be because of geography, as there is only one other FBS conference out there for them to schedule games against.